ArticlePublisher preview available

An empirical test of the assumptions of case linkage and offender profiling with serial business robberies

DOI:10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.59
Authors:
Jessica Woodhams at University of Birmingham
Jessica Woodhams
Kirsty Toye
Kirsty Toye
Kirsty Toye
  • This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.
Read publisher preview
Download citation
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Case linkage, the identification of crimes suspected of being committed by the same perpetrator on the basis of behavioral similarity, and offender profiling, the inference of offender characteristics from offense behaviors, are used to advise police investigations and, in relation to case linkage, have been admitted in legal proceedings. Criteria for expert evidence, such as the Daubert criteria (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 1993), place stringent conditions on the admissibility of expert evidence. The future contribution of these practices to legal proceedings depends, in part, on whether they are underpinned by hypotheses that are testable and supported. The 3 hypotheses of offender behavioral consistency, of offender behavioral distinctiveness, and of a homology (direct relationship) between offender characteristics and behavior were empirically examined using a sample of serial commercial robberies. Support was found for the former 2 hypotheses but not for the last. The findings of the 2 studies have implications for the future development of these practices, for legal practitioners evaluating expert evidence, and for the implementation of public policy.
  • A preview of this full-text is provided by American Psychological Association.
  • Learn more
Preview content only
Content available from Psychology Public Policy and Law
This content is subject to copyright. Terms and conditions apply.
AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE ASSUMPTIONS OF
CASE LINKAGE AND OFFENDER PROFILING WITH
SERIAL COMMERCIAL ROBBERIES
Jessica Woodhams
University of Leicester
Kirsty Toye
Surrey Police
Case linkage, the identification of crimes suspected of being committed by the same
perpetrator on the basis of behavioral similarity, and offender profiling, the infer-
ence of offender characteristics from offense behaviors, are used to advise police
investigations and, in relation to case linkage, have been admitted in legal proceed-
ings. Criteria for expert evidence, such as the Daubert criteria (Daubert v. Merrell
Dow Pharmaceuticals, 1993), place stringent conditions on the admissibility of
expert evidence. The future contribution of these practices to legal proceedings
depends, in part, on whether they are underpinned by hypotheses that are testable
and supported. The 3 hypotheses of offender behavioral consistency, of offender
behavioral distinctiveness, and of a homology (direct relationship) between offender
characteristics and behavior were empirically examined using a sample of serial
commercial robberies. Support was found for the former 2 hypotheses but not for the
last. The findings of the 2 studies have implications for the future development of
these practices, for legal practitioners evaluating expert evidence, and for the
implementation of public policy.
Keywords: crime, link, case, offense, typology
In many countries, government policy has required police forces to focus their
investigative efforts on the minority of offenders who commit the majority of the
crimes (Innes, Fielding, & Cope, 2005). This has motivated the police and
professionals working with them to develop effective means of identifying crimes
committed by the same offender (called serial crime or crime series). Behavioral
and forensic scientists have developed methods for identifying serial crime. In the
absence of suitable physical evidence, such as DNA evidence, to link different
crime scenes, case linkage (also referred to as comparative case analysis and
linkage analysis) can be used to examine the likelihood of a series of offenses
being committed by the same unidentified offender (Grubin, Kelly, & Brunsdon,
2001; Hazelwood & Warren, 2003). Case linkage is typically conducted by crime
analysts and involves the analyst engaging in a detailed behavioral analysis of
criminals’ crime scene actions (modus operandi [MO]) to determine whether there
is a sufficient degree of similarity in behavior for the crimes to be attributed to a
common offender.
Similarly, science has played an important role in developing means of
identifying offenders from the physical evidence left at the crime scene (Innes et
Jessica Woodhams, School of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, England; Kirsty
Toye, West Surrey Divisional Intelligence Unit, Surrey Police, Surrey, England.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jessica Woodhams, School of
Psychology, University of Leicester, 106 New Walk, Leicester LE1 7EA, England. E-mail:
jaw38@le.ac.uk
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
2007, Vol. 13, No. 1, 59 – 85
Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association
1076-8971/07/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.59
59
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... Studies of behavioral consistency in crime series vary substantially in methodologies (for a review, see Salfati, 2019;Sorochinski and Salfati, 2018). Many studies in the linking literature focus on examining crime pairs-either consecutive (Davies et al., 2012;Tonkin et al., 2008;Woodhams and Toye, 2007) or a random pair of two crimes (e.g., Bennell and Canter, 2002;Bennell and Jones, 2005). These studies investigate linking outside of the context of time, to explore how similar any random pair within or between series may be. ...
The fourth dimension: Time between crimes and impact on behavioral change in violent serial crime
Article
While the time dimension is part of the definition of serial crime, little attention has been given to understanding offending timelines and the impact of patterns of shorter or longer delays between crimes on the evolution of series on the ability to link crimes. Given the scarcity of research focusing on the timelines of serial offenders, the current study aimed to (1) determine whether series can be classified based on their timeline trajectories (e.g., progressively shorter intervals or progressively longer), and (2) determine whether these timeline trajectories correlate with trajectories of behavioral consistency and change across series. Data included 43 homicide series encompassing 216 crime scenes. Tra-jectories were determined based on whether intervals increased, decreased, or remained consistent across series, and whether timeline trajectories and behavioral trajectories align. Results revealed that distinct timeline trajectories can reliably distinguish between series. Results also suggested a complex interaction between time between crimes and how this relates to behavioral consistency and change trajectories, thus, suggesting that time is a useful, but potentially separate dimension in the linkage process.
View
... According to Woodhams and Toye (2007), the three hypotheses that define the foundation of profiling are "offender behavioral consistency, offender behavioral distinctiveness, and the homology (direct relationship) between offender characteristic and behavior" (p. 59). ...
Forensic Psychology: A Short eManual Forensic Psychology: Manual Unit 5: Forensic Psychology in Criminal Investigations -Offender Profiling
Chapter
Full-text available
  • Mar 2023
Forensic Psychology in Criminal Investigations – Offender Profiling
View
... Crime linkage studies are generally based on the similarity of criminal behaviour, which relies on three assumptions [25,26]: (1) The consistency of criminal behaviour and the fact that the same offender will not change much from crime to crime; (2) In criminal behaviour, different criminals display distinctive behaviours that are distinct from one another; (3) The criminal ...
View
... Así, el modelo de perfilación básico sugiere que del mismo modo que la consistencia comportamental ayudaría a catalogar la personalidad (tipo) del delincuente, la diferenciación comportamental debería servir para individualizarlo del resto. Un estándar que tiene sentido lógico, lo cual indujo durante mucho tiempo a aceptarlo sin disensiones, pero los estudios que han tratado de validarlo empíricamente se han encontrado con dificultades que lo ponen en cuarentena (Mokros & Alison, 2002;Häkkänen, Puolakka & Santila, 2004;Woodhams & Toye, 2007). En resumen, no se ha conseguido establecer evidencia empírica suficiente que permita afirmar que los criterios de la consistencia y la diferenciación comportamentales puedan trasladarse en pie de igualdad desde el ámbito de la psicología de la personalidad al de la perfilación criminal. ...
Problemática del análisis de conducta entre la ciencia y la tecnología: Aportaciones metodológicas del Método VERA
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2022
Las técnicas de perfilación criminal se encuentran inmersas en un estado de revisión en cuanto a sus metodologías y presupuestos teóricos. Se debate su contrastación empírica, su valor pericial y su validez como herramienta de investigación policial. Los pilares sobre los que descansan en gran medida sus presupuestos, como son la tesis de la homología, las ideas de la consistencia y de la diferenciación comportamental se enfrentan a evidencias en contra. Por ello, han surgido dos grandes preocupaciones en torno a la técnica de la perfilación criminal: su utilidad y su rigor metodológico. Para resolver esta coyuntura, es necesaria una revisión en profundidad de sus propuestas y el empleo de aquellas que primen el rigor metodológico con un objetivo de utilidad comprobable sin necesidad de adscribirse a teorías psicocriminológicas que no hayan sido suficientemente contrastadas. Una de estas propuestas es la del Método VERA de elaboración de perfiles psicológicos de agresores desconocidos, desarrollada con vocación de utilidad sin renunciar al método científico.
View
... Así, el modelo de perfilación básico sugiere que del mismo modo que la consistencia comportamental ayudaría a catalogar la personalidad (tipo) del delincuente, la diferenciación comportamental debería servir para individualizarlo del resto. Un estándar que tiene sentido lógico, lo cual indujo durante mucho tiempo a aceptarlo sin disensiones, pero los estudios que han tratado de validarlo empíricamente se han encontrado con dificultades que lo ponen en cuarentena (Mokros & Alison, 2002;Häkkänen, Puolakka & Santila, 2004;Woodhams & Toye, 2007). En resumen, no se ha conseguido establecer evidencia empírica suficiente que permita afirmar que los criterios de la consistencia y la diferenciación comportamentales puedan trasladarse en pie de igualdad desde el ámbito de la psicología de la personalidad al de la perfilación criminal. ...
Problemática del análisis de conducta entre la ciencia y la tecnología: Aportaciones metodológicas del Método VERA
Article
Full-text available
  • Dec 2022
Las técnicas de perfilación criminal se encuentran inmersas en un estado de revisión en cuanto a sus metodologías y presupuestos teóricos. Se debate su contrastación empírica, su valor pericial y su validez como herramienta de investigación policial. Los pilares sobre los que descansan en gran medida sus presupuestos, como son la tesis de la homología, las ideas de la consistencia y de la diferenciación comportamental se enfrentan a evidencias en contra. Por ello, han surgido dos grandes preocupaciones en torno a la técnica de la perfilación criminal: su utilidad y su rigor metodológico. Para resolver esta coyuntura, es necesaria una revisión en profundidad de sus propuestas y el empleo de aquellas que primen el rigor metodológico con un objetivo de utilidad comprobable sin necesidad de adscribirse a teorías psicocriminológicas que no hayan sido suficientemente contrastadas. Una de estas propuestas es la del Método VERA de elaboración de perfiles psicológicos de agresores desconocidos, desarrollada con vocación de utilidad sin renunciar al método científico.
View
... Central to these investigations has been the personalitybehavior association (i.e., homology assumption). To date, findings have shown either partial or little evidence supporting the association between crime-scene actions and the offender's background characteristics across different crime types (Beauregard, Lussier, and Proulx 2007b;Mokros and Alison 2002;Woodhams and Toye 2007). This has led researchers to look for other types of information to help in the prioritization and apprehension of suspects. ...
Oxford Handbook Topics in Criminology and Criminal Justice
Article
  • May 2012
This handbook is currently in development, with individual articles publishing online in advance of print publication. At this time, we cannot add information about unpublished articles in this handbook, however the table of contents will continue to grow as additional articles pass through the review process and are added to the site. Please note that the online publication date for this handbook is the date that the first article in the title was published online. For more information, please read the site FAQs.
View
View
Offender Signature
Chapter
  • Nov 2022
Offender signature refers to the pattern or cluster of modus operandi (MO) behaviors, signature behaviors, and motivation-oriented behaviors that occur within an offense or across a series of related offenses. MO behaviors are actions and decisions that are intended to assist in the completion of a crime. By contrast, signature behaviors are those acts committed by an offender that are not necessary to commit the crime, but rather suggest psychological or emotional needs. An offender׳s signature behaviors are not functional in nature. They reflect psychodynamic relationships and predispositions that are generally more stable and enduring over time than those evident in their MO. When the physical evidence in a given case is insufficient, or when the law allows it, behavioral evidence may be employed as a means of addressing the question of case linkage. Related laws allow cases to be tried jointly in order to preserve the resources that would be expended in multiple trials — so long as the behavioral linkage is more probative than prejudicial. However, there is no scientific literature or research to suggest that behavioral evidence alone may be used like fingerprints or DNA with respect to determining with any certainty that the same person is likely to be responsible for two or more crimes.
View
Case Linkage: Offender Modus Operandi and Signature
Chapter
  • Jan 2023
Case linkage or linkage analysis refers to the process of determining whether or not there are discrete connections between two or more previously unrelated cases through crime scene analysis. It involves establishing and comparing the physical evidence, victimology, crime scene characteristics, motivation, modus operandi (MO), and signature behaviors of each of the cases under review. It is seen in two different contexts: investigative and forensic. In investigative contexts, it is used to assist law enforcement by helping to establish where to apply investigative efforts and resources. In forensic contexts, it is employed to assist the court with determining whether or not there is sufficiently distinctive behavioral evidence to connect crimes together in their commission. When the physical evidence in a given case is insufficient, or when the law allows it, behavioral evidence may be employed as a secondary means of addressing the question of case linkage. However, there is no evidence or research to suggest that behavioral alone may be used like fingerprints or DNA with respect to determining with any certainty that the same person must be responsible for two or more crimes. Furthermore, while there may be general or thematic similarities between some cases, it is the nature of the dissimilarities that are of greater weight and importance to rendering final linkage conclusions. Linkage analysis efforts that fail to account for dissimilarity, focusing only on similarities, should be considered inadequate at best, if not biased.
View
Offender Characteristics: Rendering a Criminal Profile
Chapter
  • Jan 2023
Behavioral evidence analysis (BEA) is a method of criminal profiling that seeks to examine the behaviors and patterns in a particular offense and then make specific inferences about offender characteristics that are evident directly from crime-related behavior. The purpose of BEA is to provide insight into criminal behavior and to define or refine the suspect pool in a criminal investigation. It is not, however, a tool suited for the task of individuating offenders in its own right. Deducing offender characteristics is about asking the right question of offense-related behavior. The first part of the question is defining the characteristic. The second part is agreeing upon what type of behavioral constellation evidences that characteristic. If the behavior is evident in the scene, in the proper context, that characteristic is present. Offender characteristics that tend to be investigatively and even forensically relevant include criminal skill, knowledge of the victim, knowledge of the crime scene, and knowledge of methods and materials. Problem characteristics, where profilers are often wrong, include age, sex, and intelligence. To best determine and document which characteristics are evident, the profile must be a written document and not a conceptual abstract.
View
Predicting Burglar Characteristics from Crime Scene Behaviour
Article
Full-text available
The aim of the present study was to predict offender characteristics on the basis of crime scene behaviour in urban burglaries. The police files of 633 burglaries in the Finnish Metropolitan Area between 1990 and 2001 were content analysed using a predetermined list of variables. The crime scene behaviour variables were subjected to a principal component analysis. Fourteen factors indicative of different types of burglaries were identified and used to predict the characteristics of the 244 offenders using regression models. Statistically significant predictors of almost all offender characteristics were identified. From a practical point of view, the predictive models could be used in police investigations to narrow down the number of suspects.
View
View
The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
Article
  • Dec 2002
Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts' consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased over time. However, these changes were not consistent for all types of testimony. Overall, there is greater reliance on Daubert when determining the admissibility of a scientific expert. However, only criteria related to the Federal Rules of Evidence are reliably related to admissibility decisions. Details of appellate court application of the 4 Daubert criteria, the Federal Rules of Evidence, and other related factors are discussed.
View
Criminal profiling: Trial by judge and jury, not criminal psychologist
Article
  • Jan 2012
This chapter examines the numerous difficulties facing any party seeking to adduce an offender profile in a criminal trial in England. An offender profile is likely to conflict with some of the most fundamental rules of the law of evidence such as the rules of legal relevance, opinion, hearsay, and the rules guarding against prejudicial evidence. This chapter explains these rules and how they would affect the admissibility of the profile, whether adduced by the prosecution or the defence. It identifies the dangers in criminal psychologists being treated as expert witnesses and the legal hurdle profiles would face if they sought to rely on earlier research to support a particular profile. By providing an explanation of the relevant rules of the law of evidence and how they impinge on the admissibility of the profile, the aim is for psychologists to be better equipped to address requests from the investigating authorities for profiles.
View
View
View
View
Criminal Expertise and Offender Decision Making: An Experimental Study of the Target Selection Process in Residential Burglary
Article
This article reports the results of an experiment designed to explore (a) the environmental cues used by active residential burglars in choosing targets, and (b) the extent to which such offenders possess specialized cognitive abilities (commonly referred to as expertise) that might facilitate this decision-making process. Forty-seven active residential burglars and a matched group of 34 nonoffenders were shown photographs of houses and asked whether the dwellings would be attractive or otherwise to burglars. Subsequently, subjects were given a surprise recognition test where, in some photographs, physical features of the setting had been changed. Results revealed that active residential burglars were significantly better than nonoffenders at recognizing certain “burglary relevant” environmental changes. Moreover, offenders differed from controls in the mix of environmental cues they employed when selecting targets. These results argue for the importance of acquired expertise in explanations of offender decision making.
View
View
View