ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Threat of punishment has been emphasized as one of the effective tools to deter taxpayers’ non-compliance attitudes. Thus this study aims to explore the impact of threat of punishment on both individual taxpayers’ attitudes, compliance and non-compliance. The findings from a mixed-modes survey indicate that threat of punishment is insignificant on taxpayers who are willing to comply with tax laws. They tend to avoid taxes when they are threatened with tax audits and penalties. Overall, threat of punishment appears to have not only an insignificant impact on compliant taxpayers but also trigger their intentions to be less compliant.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
Available online at
1877-0428 © 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
Peer-review under responsibility of the School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.079
International Conference on Accounting Studies 2014, ICAS 2014, 18-19 August 2014, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia
The impact of threat of punishment on tax compliance and non-
compliance attitudes in Malaysia
Raihana Mohdalia*, Khadijah Isab, Salwa Hana Yusoffb
aUTM Razak School, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Semarak, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
bInternational Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Threat of punishment has been emphasized as one of the effective tools to deter taxpayers’ non-compliance attitudes. Thus this
study aims to explore the impact of threat of punishment on both individual taxpayers’ attitudes, compliance and non-
compliance. The findings from a mixed-modes survey indicate that threat of punishment is insignificant on taxpayers who are
willing to comply with tax laws. They tend to avoid taxes when they are threatened with tax audits and penalties. Overall, threat
of punishment appears to have not only an insignificant impact on compliant taxpayers but also trigger their intentions to be
less compliant.
© 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Peer-review under responsibility of the School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
Keywords: Voluntary tax compliance; tax avoidance attitude; threat of punishment
1. Introduction
Taxpayers are expected to be deterred by threat of punishment from the tax structure, namely through tax
audits, penalties and tax rates. Prior research mainly focuses on the impact of threat of punishment on tax evasion
because the changes in the tax structure are anticipated to change the way people behave in fulfilling their tax
obligations. However, the direction of tax research has shifted since 1990s in order to try to understand the positive
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +6-03-2615-4584.
E-mail address:
© 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
Peer-review under responsibility of the School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia.
292 Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
attitudes of taxpayers rather than the negative attitudes of taxpayers. This is because despite the slim chances of
being audited or reasonable penalties being imposed on tax evasion, most people are willingly abide by tax laws.
In general, there is a large body of theoretical and empirical evidence to support the view that threat of punishment
such as higher audit probabilities and penalties encouraged compliance and higher tax rates discouraged
compliance. However, there are other studies that pointed to different direction.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the impact of threat of punishment on both compliance attitudes
of individual taxpayers namely voluntary tax compliance and tax avoidance attitude in a study. However, the only
tax structure element employed in the present study was the tax audit and penalty to measure the threat of
punishment variable. The tax rate element was excluded because the Malaysian residents follow a progressive tax
rate schedule and tax audit and penalty elements appear to be more influential in compelling taxpayers to make
positive compliance decisions. The remainder of the paper is organized as follows. The next section briefly
reviews the literature regarding the influence of threat of punishment in tax compliance studies. This discussion is
then followed by the presentation of the methods used in this study. Next, the findings of the study are presented.
The subsequent section provides a discussion of the overall findings together with the theoretical and policy
implications. Several limitations of the current study are acknowledged and the final section concludes the paper.
2. Threat of punishment and tax compliance
Fear has been used by tax authorities as a means to force taxpayers to conform to tax laws given that a taxpayer
is viewed as a “perfectly amoral, risk-neutral or risk-averse, utility maximizing individual who chooses to evade
tax whenever the expected gain exceeded the cost” (Milliron & Toy, 1988, p. 85). The economic deterrence
approach was developed based on the economics-of-crime model, introduced by Becker (1968) to optimize the
public and private policies in fighting illegal behavior since threats of punishment are expected to encourage
lawful behavior. Basically, it is assumed that the tax compliance decision is made by a taxpayer under uncertain
circumstances, strictly due to the fear of the possibility of being caught and penalized (Alm & McKee, 1998).
The threat of punishment, consisting of tax audits, tax penalties and tax rates, is used in most countries to deter
taxpayers’ non-compliance behavior. In general, most of prior studies showed a positive correlation between audit
probability and compliance (Fischer, Wartick, & Mark, 1992). However, the impacts of audit probabilities on tax
compliance are varied depending on the group of taxpayers. For example, audit probabilities were found to have
strong influences on tax compliance for sole proprietors but only little effect on salaried taxpayers (Witte &
Woodbury, 1985). Hence, tax audits that specifically target a certain group of taxpayers seem to be more effective
in increasing tax compliance rather than random audits (Hasseldine, 1993). Further, audit probabilities may only
affect taxpayers who have the intention to evade (Hanno & Violette, 1996; Trivedi, Shehata, & Lynn, 2003).
Spicer and Thomas (1982) suggested that taxpayers may only abide by tax laws when they have definite
information about the possibilities of being audited.
There are mixed findings on the influence of penalties. A number of studies (for example: Beck, Jon, & Jung,
1991; Park & Hyun, 2003) indicated a positive influence of higher penalty on tax compliance but other studies (for
example: Alm, Bahl, & Murray, 1990; Alm, Jackson, & McKee, 1992) lead to the opposite findings. The severity
of the penalty may only discourage taxpayers from reporting their true incomes because the possibility of gaining
is greater than the possibility of losing (Slemrod, 2004). In addition, the impact of penalty also varies according to
group of taxpayers. For example, the severity of criminal fraud penalties was found to be positively related to the
behavior of high income self-employed individuals (Alm, Bahl, & Murray, 1990). On the other hand, civil
penalties appeared to have negative relationships with the behaviors of small proprietors and middle income
individuals (Witte & Woodbury, 1985).
Studies that examined tax rates as a compliance variable have produced mixed results. For instance, it is
apparent that taxpayers are prone to understate their incomes when the marginal tax rate is increased (Clotfelter,
1983; Skinner & Slemrod, 1985). In other words, higher tax rates will pressure taxpayers to be less compliant.
Feinstein (1991), however, discovered conflicting findings which were in line with the findings by Etzioni (1986),
that is, despite the fact that the tax rate was stable, the tax compliance rate was still low. Sandmo (2005) in his
Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
review of the theory of tax evasion believed that the tax rate was not among the main factors that influenced
taxpayers’ decision-making as compared to the penalty and audit rate.
In Malaysia, the tax structure, consisting of tax rate, audit rate and penalty rate, is apparently influential on
taxpayers’ compliance behaviors as evident in an experimental study involving two groups of undergraduate
students (Loo, 2006b). A mixed-methods study (a survey and an experiment) also demonstrated the same findings
except for tax audit which was found to be less effective for salaried taxpayers (Loo, McKerchar, & Hansford,
2009). This may be because the scheduler tax deduction is imposed on the majority of salaried taxpayers in
Malaysia. However, the penalty rate appeared to be the most influential tax compliance determinant of tax
compliance attitudes in a comparison study of taxpayers’ compliance attitudes before and after the implementation
of the SAS (Loo, 2006a). Despite the tax structure being evident to deter the non-compliance behavior of
taxpayers, the enforcement of the rules was viewed to be rather loose which may reduce the integrity of the IRBM
in the eyes of taxpayers. Overall, the threat of punishment remains significant in deterring the negative intentions
or attitudes of taxpayers.
3. Research method
The main principle of a survey is to gather original data directly from a population through a survey of a
fraction of the population to reflect the larger population (Salant & Dillman, 1994). It is regarded as an excellent
method in rationalizing an individual’s attitude towards certain issues (Babbie, 2008), hence a self-administered
survey was utilized in this study for that purpose. One of the most successful techniques to avoid low response
rates in a survey is to employ a drop-off method (Dillman, 2007). However, a drop-off survey is also considered to
be costly since it requires travelling from one location to another for hand deliveries and retrievals of
questionnaires (Zikmund, 2003). Thus an online survey was then selected as a second method since it is known for
its economic advantage as an inexpensive method (Van Selm & Jankowski, 2006). There is a possibility of
responses received from one mode may differ from responses received in the other mode but only little impact is
expected (de Leeuw, 2008). Thus both a drop-off and online survey were used in this study.
The current study only involved individual taxpayers in Malaysia comprising salaried and self-employed
taxpayers. The potential respondents for drop-off survey were selected based on proportionate stratified sampling
according to the proportion of ethnic groups in Malaysia namely Malays and other indigenous groups (66 percent),
Chinese (25 percent) and Indians (8 percent) (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2001). A total of 450
questionnaires were sent to seven companies and distributed by the intermediaries to salaried taxpayers and the
balance, 50 questionnaires were sent personally to self-employed taxpayers.A survey link was also forwarded to
both salaried and self-employed taxpayers.
Three constructs were developed to measure individuals’ attitudes towards tax compliance and their
perceptions towards threat of punishment. The items for these constructs were adapted from the literature review
and self-developed. Tax compliance attitudes were represented by two dependent variables namely voluntary tax
compliance (VTC) adapted from Kirchler and Wahl (2010) and Braithwaite, Murphy, and Reinhart (2007); and tax
avoidance attitude (TAA) adapted from Gilligan and Richardson (2005) and Niemirowski and Wearing (2006).
The independent variable namely threat of punishment (ToP) was adapted from Verboon and van Dijke (2007) and
one item was self-developed. All three constructs were measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 5
= strongly agree).
4. Findings
The total usable responses from both methods was 302 with 197 responses were received from the drop-off survey
and 105 responses from the online survey. The responses from these two methods were combined because the
same questionnaire was used in both methods and the t-test results show there were no significant differences
between data from both methods such as (t(300)VTC= 0.91, p = n.s.). The percentage of Malay (78 percent)
294 Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
involved in this study appeared to be over representative compared to Chinese (17 percent) and Indians (5 percent),
but the overall sample was considered acceptable because it reflected the actual ranking of Malaysian proportion in
the population. Almost 90 percent of the respondents were salaried taxpayers and 10 percent were self-employed
taxpayers. The overall mean score for voluntary tax compliance and tax avoidance attitude is 3.67 and 2.53,
respectively. This result demonstrates high voluntary tax compliance among the respondents and negative
inclination towards the component of tax avoidance attitude.
There were mixed attitudes that shaped the respondents’ compliance attitudes in terms of the impact of the
threat of punishment as shown in Table 1. A large number of respondents appeared to disagree with the third
(ToP3) and second (ToP2) items with a percentage of 62 and 40, respectively. They believed in a high possibility
of being audited and a high chance of being discovered and punished by the IRBM. On the contrary, more than 45
percent of the respondents appeared to agree that the potential of being tracked by the IRBM was unlikely if it
involved the understatement of income or overstatement of expenses (ToP4). The respondents’ awareness of the
type and extent of penalties and risks indicated similar percentages, around 30 to 35 percent in all three categories
of attitudes for the first item (ToP1). The overall mean score of 2.85 illustrated the respondents’ disagreement but
the inclination was towards a neutral attitude.
Table 1. Attitudes towards the threat of punishment
Item Statement Mean Med. SD
ToP1 I am NOT aware of the type and extent
of penalties and risks that exist for
income tax evasion in Mala
2.98 3.00 1.00 108
ToP2 It is unlikely for taxpayers to be
discovered and punished by the IRBM
if the
were to evade income taxes.
2.83 3.00 0.99 122
ToP3 I do NOT pay taxes as required by the
regulations because I know the
probability of being audited is very
2.44 2.00 1.01 188
ToP4 The IRBM rarely finds out if someone
has overly understated their income or
overstated their deductions.
3.13 3.00 1.01 104
ToP - 2.85 2.75 0.70 - - -
* The percentage of responses is given in parentheses and some of them do not total up to one hundred percent due to rounding.
** n = 302.
The threat of punishment was found to have a negative relationship with voluntary tax compliance and not
statistically significant (r = -0.003). In contrast, it was found to a have positive significant correlation with tax
avoidance attitude (r = +0.38). A simple regression analysis indicated that threat of punishment was insignificant
(β = 0.08, p = n.s.in explaining voluntary tax compliance but a significant (β = 0.06, p = 0.00predictor of tax
avoidance attitude.
5. Discussion of findings
The highest mean score perceived by individual taxpayers in Malaysia between two tax compliance components
was voluntary tax compliance. This may indicate a high tendency of individual taxpayers in Malaysia to comply
voluntarily with tax laws which lends support to the prior research (Loo, McKerchar, & Hansford, 2010). One of
the potential explanations for this strong positive attitude may be because the majority of the respondents were
salaried taxpayers. Being salaried taxpayers, a portion of taxpayers’ salaries was deducted automatically by their
employers for payment of income taxes based on the scheduler tax deduction set up by the IRBM. Further, the
employment of the e-filing system in Malaysia probably offers an easy and economical transaction for taxpayers
who have straight-forward tax affairs such as salaried taxpayers who were the majority of the respondents in this
study. The provision of convenient and inexpensive ways to deal with the tax authority is stressed by McKerchar
Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
and Evans (2009) as an important strategy in fostering voluntary tax compliance. Thus high levels of voluntary tax
compliance were evident among the individuals in this study.
The influence of threat of punishment on tax compliance components in this study was found to be positively
statistically significant only on tax avoidance attitude. The threat of punishment has encouraged taxpayers to be
more inclined towards the tax avoidance attitude. Since they were already willing to comply, the use of threat of
punishment may only encourage them to be less compliant which might indicate their rebellious attitude against
the government. This is probably because compliers are less likely to be affected by the threat of punishment as
compared to non-compliers (Hanno & Violette, 1996) but the threat of punishment might trigger rather than
discourage negative intentions or attitudes. This lends strong support to prior Malaysian studies, even though the
term used is different (Loo, 2006a; Loo et. al., 2009). Tax structure (tax audits and penalties) appeared to have an
indirect influence on tax compliance which led some taxpayers to over-comply. However, their main reason for
complying was to get a tax refund.
The insignificant impact of the threat of punishment on taxpayers’ positive attitudes probably reflects the
salaried taxpayers being the majority in the current study. This was probably because they had less opportunity to
avoid or even to evade paying taxes because their tax affairs were direct and simple. Self-employed taxpayers were
considered to have more complicated tax affairs that enable them to make use of the various loopholes in the
income tax rules. This strongly supports the prior international (Witte & Woodbury, 1985) and Malaysian (Loo et.
al., 2009) studies that showed the prospect of a tax audit was ineffective for salaried taxpayers. However, the threat
of punishment still appeared to be effective if they had the intention to avoid taxes, regardless of their employment
One important policy implication for the IRBM from this study is probably to communicate the positive and
negative information to taxpayers as practiced by the Australian Tax Office (2012). For example, the Australian
Tax Office plan for compliance activities for 2012 to 2013 were released to the public in July 2012 as a means of
communicating relevant information to taxpayers and the compliance information is also conveyed through the
media and tax practitioner community. It is probable that such a targeted policy could be practiced in Malaysia.
For example, positive information is probably effective for salaried taxpayers in Malaysia because they have
strong intentions to voluntarily comply so that they can easily respond to positive appeals from the tax authority
and negative information most probably is more appropriate to threaten taxpayers who have the intention to evade
taxes. Interestingly, both types of information are found to be effective on “high opportunity” taxpayers such as the
self-employed (Hasseldine, Hite, & Toumi, 2007, p. 189).
The most apparent limitation of this research is that it relied on a self-reported method to collect data and that
may have led to inaccuracies in the data. This is because respondents may interpret the questions differently
according to their understanding and may misunderstand the questions because of certain terminologies even
though reasonable efforts were made to ensure the wording was simple and precise. The second obvious limitation
was the selection of taxpayers involved in this study. Even though several attempts were made to include more
self-employed taxpayers in the surveys, the salaried taxpayers remain as the majority of the total respondents.
Furthermore, the opportunities to avoid or evade paying taxes between these two types of taxpayers are different
because salaried taxpayers have fewer opportunities to evade compared to self-employed taxpayers (Braithwaite,
2003). Thus they might have different perspectives and attitudes towards tax compliance issues.
6. Conclusions
The empirical evidence in this study has shown that the threat of punishment is less likely to be effective in
deterring people who already have strong intentions to comply with tax laws but more likely to increase their
negative intentions to comply when threat of punishment is employed as one of the tools to reduce tax non-
compliance attitudes. Their willingness to comply probably deteriorates because they are being threatened for
things that they do not have any intentions to do. Therefore, the IRBM is suggested to carefully plan their strategy
by using target policy in disseminating information to the right group of taxpayers such as salaried and self-
296 Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
employed taxpayers in encouraging voluntary tax compliance in Malaysia. Since this study was dominated by
salaried taxpayers, the key direction for future research is to explore self-employed taxpayers’ perspectives on
threat of punishment. It may provide interesting information to fully understand the possibility of taxpayers’
changing attitudes depending on the avoidance opportunities available to them. Even with its limitations, this study
has provided evidence that threat of punishment might activate the non-compliance attitudes in people who have
strong intentions to comply.
Alm, J., Bahl, R., & Murray, M. (1990). Tax structure and tax compliance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(4), 603-613.
Alm, J., Jackson, B., & McKee, M. (1992). Estimating the determinants of taxpayer compliance with experimental data. National Tax Journal,
45(1), 107-114.
Alm, J., & McKee, M. (1998). Extending the lessons of laboratory experiments on tax compliance to managerial and decision economics.
Managerial and Decision Economics, 19(4/5), 259-275.
Australian Tax Office. (2012). Compliance program 2012-13. Canberra: Australian Tax Office.
Babbie, E. (2008). The basics of social research (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Higher Education.
Beck, P., Jon, D., & Jung, W. O. (1991). Experimental evidence on taxpayer reporting under uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 66(3), 535-
Becker, G. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217.
Braithwaite, V. (2003). Perceptions of who’s not paying their fair share? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 38(3), 335-362.
Braithwaite, V., Murphy, K., & Reinhart, M. (2007). Taxation threat, motivational postures, and responsive regulation. Law and Policy, 29(1),
Clotfelter, C. T. (1983). Tax evasion and tax rates: An analysis of individual returns. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 65(3), 363-373.
de Leeuw, E. D. (2008). Choosing the method of data collection. In E. D. de Leeuw, J. J. Hox & D. A. Dillman (Eds.), International handbook
of survey methodology (pp. 113-135). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2001). Population and housing census of Malaysia 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics
Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Etzioni, A. (1986). Tax evasion and perceptions of tax fairness: A research note. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22(2), 177-185.
Feinstein, J. S. (1991). An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. The RAND Journal of Economics, 22(1), 14-35.
Fischer, C. M., Wartick, M., & Mark, M. M. (1992). Detection probability and taxpayer compliance: A review of the literature. Journal of
Accounting Literature, 11(1), 1-46.
Gilligan, G., & Richardson, G. (2005). Perceptions of tax fairness and tax compliance in Australia and Hong Kong - a preliminary study.
Journal of Financial Crime, 12(4), 331-343.
Hanno, D. M., & Violette, G. R. (1996). An analysis of moral and social influences on taxpayer behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting,
8, 57-75.
Hasseldine, J. (1993). How do revenue audits affect taxpayers compliance? Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation, July/August, 424-
Hasseldine, J., Hite, P., & Toumi, M. (2007). Persuasive communications: Tax compliance enforcement strategies for sole proprietors.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(1), 171-194.
Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory: Tax-i voluntary tax compliance, enforced tax compliance, tax avoidance, and tax
evasion. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(3), 331-346.
Loo, E. C. (2006a). Determinants of individual taxpayers' compliance behaviour: Experience of the transition from pre to post self assessment
in Malaysia. In M. Walpole & M. McKerchar (Eds.), Further global challenges in tax administration (pp. 201-225). Bath: Fiscal
Loo, E. C. (2006b). Tax knowledge, tax structure and compliance: A report on a quasi-experiment. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and
Policy, 12(2), 117-140.
Loo, E. C., McKerchar, M., & Hansford, A. (2009). Understanding the compliance behaviour of Malaysian individual taxpayers using a mixed
method approach. Journal of Australasian Tax Teachers Association, 4(1), 181-202.
Loo, E. C., McKerchar, M., & Hansford, A. (2010). Findings on the impact of self assessment on the compliance behaviour of individual
taxpayers in Malaysia: A case study approach. Journal of Australian Taxation, 13(1/2), 1-22.
McKerchar, M., & Evans, C. (2009). Sustaining growth in developing economies through improved taxpayer compliance: Challenges for policy
maker and revenue authorities. eJournal of Tax Research, 7(2), 171-201.
Milliron, V. C., & Toy, D. R. (1988). Tax compliance: An investigation of key features. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 9(2),
Niemirowski, P., & Wearing, A. (2006). "Do Australian taxation office staff and compliant taxpayers identify with tax from the same
perspective, or are there significant degrees of separation?". Journal of Australian Taxation 9(2), 191-171.
Raihana Mohdali et al. / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 291 – 297
Park, C., & Hyun, J. K. (2003). Examining the determinants of tax compliance by experimental data: A case of korea. Journal of Policy
Modeling, 25(8), 673-684.
Salant, P. A., & Dillman, D. A. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Sandmo, A. (2005). The theory of tax evasion: A retrospective view. National Tax Journal, 58(4), 643-663.
Skinner, J., & Slemrod, J. (1985). An economic perspective on tax evasion. National Tax Journal, 38(3), 345-353.
Slemrod, J. (2004). The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal, 57(4), 877-899.
Spicer, M. W., & Thomas, J. E. (1982). Audit probabilities and the tax evasion decision: An experimental approach. Journal of Economic
Psychology, 2(3), 241-245.
Trivedi, V. U., Shehata, M., & Lynn, B. (2003). Impact of personal and situational factors on taxpayer compliance: An experimental analysis.
Journal of Business Ethics, 47(3), 175-197.
Van Selm, M., & Jankowski, N. (2006). Conducting online surveys. Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 435-456.
Verboon, P., & van Dijke, M. (2007). A self-interest analysis of justice and tax compliance: How distributive justice moderates the effect of
outcome favorability. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(6), 704-727.
Witte, A. D., & Woodbury, D. F. (1985). The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the U.S. individual
income tax. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 1-13.
Zikmund, W. G. (2003). Business research method (7th ed.). Ohio: Thompson.
... According to Raihana et al. (2014), the issue of tax compliance becomes one of the main interests and requires special attention by policymakers, tax administrations and societies since non-compliance behaviour may lead to a reduction in tax revenue which indirectly might affect citizens, including those who complies voluntarily. TABLE 1. Number of cases (tax audit settlement) and amount of tax penalties collected Source: IRBM Annual Report, 2011-2015 The amount of tax penalties collected per year indirectly indicates the trend of tax non-compliance in Malaysia (Kasipillai 1999;Natrah 2009;Nor Azrina et al. 2014;Muhammad Aqbal et al. 2016;Nuridayu et al. 2017). ...
... In addition, this study will also examine another two factors, namely treatment provided by tax authority and SVDP, which is also considered an accommodative approach to better understand tax compliance strategies by the IRBM. Many previous studies in Malaysia focus on the tax audit and penalty (deterrence approach) (Razilina et al. 2012;Mohamad et al. 2013;Mohd Rizal et al. 2013;Raihana et al. 2014;Noor Sharoja et al. 2014). Therefore, this study intends to provide a more comprehensive perspective of compliance strategies by extending the study to include the 'other side' or 'positive side' of compliance strategy that is accommodative approach to improve tax compliance. ...
... The threat of punishment has been emphasized as one of the effective tools to curb evasion and has become one of the main strategies used by most tax authorities to overcome non-compliance issue (Verboon & van Dijke 2007;Murphy 2008;Devos 2013;Raihana et al. 2014). It consists of tax audit, tax penalty and tax rate. ...
Full-text available
Due to the significance of tax revenue as the primary source of a country's income, any leakage due to non-compliance behaviour may impact the country, which will eventually affect citizens. One way to reduce tax non-compliance is through compliance strategies which can be categorised into two; deterrence and accommodative approach. It is advisable that tax authority should not only focus on the deterrent approach (tax audit and penalty), mainly on tax offenders. Instead, tax authority also needs to find ways to preserve good taxpayers' continuous fulfilment of their tax responsibilities, encourage future taxpayers to commit to tax laws, and transform tax offenders to become good taxpayers using the accommodative approach. This study uses the survey method to determine individual taxpayers' perception of tax authority's compliance strategies (threat of punishment, tax education programme, treatment provided by tax authority, special voluntary disclosure programme (SVDP)). This study then investigates the influence of those compliance strategies towards tax compliance behaviour. Our findings indicate that individual taxpayers have a positive perception towards compliance strategies provided by the tax authority in Malaysia (refer to Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia (IRBM)). In addition, the threat of punishment, treatment provided by IRBM and SVDP are significantly proven to have a positive relationship with tax compliance. However, it is suggested that IRBM should improve their tax education programmes as it is found to be insignificant. This study contributes to current tax compliance literature in a relatively important field of compliance strategies by providing comprehensive insights into the influence of both deterrence and accommodative apporaches in influencing tax compliance behaviour, as well as focusing more on an accommodative approach that is receiving attention lately. With both approaches in one study, the results of this study provide a clear, complete and comprehensive understanding since most of previous studies conducted separately. Finally, the findings of this study also provide valuable and significant input to the tax authorities and policymakers, especially IRBM in assessing and making a necessary improvement on their compliance strategies with the mission to enhance tax compliance behaviour, especially among individual taxpayers.
... The reviewed articles in this sub section are related to economic or structural variables within the developing countries. For instance, Mohdali, Isa, Yusoff and Salwa (2014) discover that punishment is a good determining factor of tax compliance in their empirical study. A conceptual study by Sinnasamy, Bidin and Ismail (2015) conclude that tax rate and tax penalty are determining factors of tax compliance in Malaysia. ...
Full-text available
It is pertinent that sustainable tax compliance is achieved only if the tax policy takes the main determinants of tax compliance into consideration. Meanwhile, tax compliance has been seen as one of the critical tax administration issue particularly amongst the developing countries of the world. In that regards, scholars have contributed immensely in studying the causes or determinants of the phenomenon based on some prevailing factors associated to economic, social and psychological conditions of our society. And the factors are basically linked to some suggested theories. Nevertheless, the study premised on reviewing some related studies conducted amongst the developing countries of the world based on thematic and chronological approach, in order to know the most commonly identified determining factors of tax compliance between the periods of 1998 to 2022. it is imperative to note that the major determining factors extracted from the reviewed literatures are basically ranked from the most commonly identified to the least identified as: taxpayers attitudes and tax fairness perceptions were frequently identified six times each, secondly, tax payers knowledge, perceived behavior and subjective norms were identified four times each, thirdly, sources of income, complexity of tax laws, ethical sensitivity and religiosity knowledge were frequently identified three times, and lastly, perceive tax system and perceived usefulness were frequently identified from the literatures two times each respectively. Therefore, the study concludes that the commonly identified determining factors of tax compliance in the developing countries based on reviewed literature are taxpayer’s attitude and fairness perception. Hence, other empirical studies may need to be conducted to justify the position of this study.
... In fact, it is argued that the excessive use of coercive and punitive measures can rather undermine the legitimacy of public authorities and generate a counterproductive impact on people's commitment to compliance (e.g. Murphy, 2008;Mohdali, 2014). ...
Full-text available
Purpose The policy approach in Pakistan with regard to combating the informal economy has remained quite myopic and skewed in its reliance on measures informed by the rational economic-actor theory as opposed to the social-actor approach. Thus, this study attempts to evaluate and synthesise the two alternative policy approaches and formulate a more theoretically integrative understanding of the subject. Design/methodology/approach The authors gather data from 600 micro-entrepreneurs operating in the retail and wholesale sector of Lahore, Pakistan, which is then analysed using an ordered logit regression technique. Findings In contrast to more developed countries, the finding here is that higher perceived penalties have a highly significant and positive impact on the level of formality of Pakistani micro-entrepreneurs. The perceived risk of detection, meanwhile, has only a moderately significant impact on the micro-entrepreneurs level of formality. Likewise, the level of vertical and horizontal trust has a positive but moderately significant impact on the level of formality. Nonetheless, both the vertical and horizontal trust exhibit a very significant moderating effect on the relationship between the use of penalties and the level of formality, that is, the higher the level of trust that the micro-entrepreneurs have in the state and other businesses, the lower is the effectiveness of punitive measures. Practical implications Deterrence is an effective way to enhance the level of formality in the case of the Pakistani context. Nonetheless, the authors imply that without building trust, this overreliance on punitive and detective measures can actually be counter-productive. A combined and congruent (not sequential) use of voluntary compliance measures is thus warranted. Originality/value It is a unique attempt to evaluate and synthesise the global policy theorisations in a non-mainstream and antagonistic climate, such as Pakistan.
... In contrast with Mohdali et al. (2014), this assertion claimed that sanctions and penalties encourage tax avoidance among taxpayers because of what they believe is a "threat of punishment" from the government. In contrast, the result disagrees with Gemmell et al. (2018), who claimed that tax penalties would not affect taxpayers. ...
Full-text available
Research Aims: The purpose of this study is to determine the underlying reasons behind the man-agement's tax compliance and non-compliance decisions. Design/methodology/approach: This study employed a mixed-method research approach in which the scale observations of taxpayers' tax compliance practices and the taxpayers' lived experiences and perspectives about tax where integrated. The quantitative approach utilized binary logistic regression , and the qualitative approach used thematic and joint-result analyses. Research Findings: The integration of the two research methods revealed three distinct types of taxpayers: impulsive, reflective, and active. The result indicates that the taxpayer's compliance behavior may have an effect on the sustainability of the country's firms, implying that the taxpayer's compliance behavior may manifest in management practices and governance. Theoretical Contribution/Originality: The study's development adds to the body of knowledge of the three types of taxpayers who rationalize their tax compliance and non-compliance. These taxpayers' characteristics are a meta-inference of the effect of tax filing experience and tax morale, and the taxpayers' emerged attitudes substantiated by their perspective on tax. Managerial Implications in the Southeast Asian context: Tax evasion may be a symptom of a larger issue with public finance, law enforcement, organizational architecture, or an organization's ethical standards. A complying owner or management exhibits ethical ideals in their business practices. Taxpayers' ability and willingness to comply with tax regulations will afford management with more opportunities to attract more investors and partners because of ethical and good governance practices. Research limitations and implications:The mixed-method approach elucidates why taxpayers have diverse motivations for tax compliance. This study adds to the literature a new perspective on tax compliance.
Full-text available
The importance of green innovations and their contribution to the business organizations is quite effective in the allocation of limited resources in business environment. In general, the green business strategic implementations focus on finding solutions to environmental problems. This study argues that developing innovation and gaining an innovative perspective are indispensable for the success of green management. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the effects of green innovations that are directly related to the environmental factors on firm performance. The study has concluded that innovations are in demand in the green product and green service market. Green innovations increase efficiency in green management processes and positively affect company performance. Suppliers are the external factors of businesses that have the most impact on new innovations in green management. In other words, suppliers have an important role in developing green innovation in green management. The other important environmental factor affecting green management innovation is financial factor. When the financial constraints of the green enterprises are eliminated, their financial resources are increased and the green management innovations of these enterprises also increase. On the other hand, when the financial performance of the green enterprises increases and the productivity rates within these green organizations are also positively affected. In summary, developing an innovative perspective in the green management process have positive influences on business performance. By determining the effective environmental factors that having positive impact on green management innovations; businesses could achieve a sustainable growth and their contribution to the environment could be more sustainable
We raised a question of differences in declared tax evasion attitudes between students and entrepreneurs under the slippery slope framework of tax compliance. Scenarios were used to manipulate the two dimensions of the framework, trust in authorities and power of authorities (high versus low trust; high versus low power), in an imagined country named Varosia. After reading one of the four scenarios, economics and finance students and entrepreneurs from Poland reported their tax compliance intentions. Tax evasion attitudes were different for entrepreneurs and students. Results indicated that students were more prone to tax evasion but this effect could be mitigated by particularly increasing the power of authorities. Conversely, for entrepreneurs, trust in authorities had a stronger impact on tax compliance than enforcement. Low tax morale was a significant predictor of high tax evasion in both groups.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This study examines whether Cost of Capital (COC) impact on non-financial firms’ financial performance in Nigeria for the period 2015-2019. Not considering COC could lead to future failure of a company. Companies can face devastating losses by underestimating their COC. Management used COC to recognise and choose projects, strategies, deals and portfolios that will effectively add value to the company and its shareholders. Players and institutions in stock markets, like investment funds, banks and other financial institutions, have the incentives to suitably incorporate the objective of optimising COC. Evaluating Nigeria’s capital market which is an avenue for sourcing long-term resources to finance long-term scheme is underdeveloped compared to its foreign equivalent. Therefore, the main responsibility of efficient gathering of capital or mobilisation of fund from the surplus units of the economy and successfully channeling it to the deficit sector so as to meet up with its long-term capital needs has not been carried out prudently. For example, Nigeria’s capital market is very illiquid, few quoted firms with low volume of transactions and with low market capitalisation which consequently result to increase in the COC. In spite of the increasing literature, the COC-financial performance nexus remained a knowledge gap as most existing studies focused on foreign countries with few conducted in Nigeria hence the need for this study.
The tax credit rating mechanism was formally implemented in 2014. As an important tax collection and management innovation, it has attracted the attention of regulatory authorities and scholars. Different from the literature that directly examines corporate tax compliance, we focus on the impact of tax credit rating implementation on corporate research and development (R&D) investment decisions. Using listed companies’ data from 2014 to 2019, we find that companies with higher tax credit ratings invest more in innovation, because the system helps managers identify R&D opportunities, alleviates corporate financing constraints and reduces agency costs. We confirm that tax credit ratings have manifold impacts on corporate information environments and business decisions, with better ratings positively affecting firms’ business decisions. This discovery can inform tax policy reform, encourage corporate innovation and construct social credit systems.
Full-text available
ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis Pengaruh Pemahaman PP No. 23 Tahun 2018 terhadap Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak usaha mikro kecil menengah (UMKM) dengan Pemahaman Insentif PPh Final UMKM Ditanggung Pemerintah sebagai Variabel Moderasi pada Wajib Pajak UMKM di Kota Bogor dan Kabupaten Bogor. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah purposive sampling. Metode analisis data menggunakan structural equation model (SEM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman terhadap PP No. 23 Tahun 2018 mempengaruhi tingkat kepatuhan wajib pajak UMKM. Sementara insentif yang diberikan pemerintah tidak mempengaruhi kepatuhan wajib pajak karena para wajib UMKM masih memiliki kendala dalam menerapkan insentif yang diberikan. Dengan demikian, diharapkan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (DJP) dapat memberikan pembinaan berupa sosialisasi yang mudah diakses dan dimengerti oleh para wajib pajak UMKM mengenai pentingnya melaksanakan kewajiban perpajakan. Berdasarkan hasil analisis statistik deskriptif dan uji hipotesis dalam penelitian ini masih ditemukan cukup banyak wajib pajak UMKM yang belum memiliki NPWP dan masih kurangnya pemahaman terhadap insentif PPh UMKM ditanggung pemerintah. ABSTRACTThis study aims to examine and analyze the effect of understanding PP no. 23 of 2018 on Micro and Small Business Taxpayer Compliance with Understanding of MSME Final Income Tax Incentives Borne by the Government as Moderating Variables for MSME Taxpayers in Bogor City and Bogor Regency. The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling. The data analysis method uses a structural equation model (SEM). The results showed that the understanding of PP no. 23 of 2018 affects the level of compliance of MSME taxpayers. Meanwhile, incentives provided by the government do not affect taxpayer compliance because MSMEs are required to apply the incentives provided. Thus, it is hoped that the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) can provide guidance in the form of socialization that is easily accessible and easily accessible by MSME taxpayers regarding the importance of implementing taxes. Based on descriptive statistical analysis and hypothesis testing in this study, it was found that quite a lot of MSME taxpayers did not have a TIN and there was still a lack of understanding of the MSME PPh incentives borne by the government.
Full-text available
Data from the Community Hopes, Fears and Actions Survey are used to examine how pervasive the view is that the more privileged in society are failing to pay their fair share of tax, to understand the beliefs that underpin such perceptions, and the reforms that are needed to open dialogue with the Australian public about the issue. Support is found for five hypotheses. Economic self-interest provides a partial explanation for perceptions of vertical inequity, but more important are disillusionment with the Australian democracy and perceptions of insufficient procedural justice from the tax office. Values about how Australian society should develop also play a part. Those looking for a more equal, caring and compassionate Australia perceive there to be a high level of vertical inequity. Such perceptions are not shared by those aspiring to an Australia that pursues competitive advantage either economically or politically.
This research note addresses the debate as to whether tax evasion resultsfrom increased tax rates and economic incentives-as many economists claim -orfrom other factors as well, specifically taxpayers 'perceptions that taxes are unfair. Using survey data collectedfrom 1960-1980 and information on tax rates and estimates of tax evasion for that period, the authorfinds that tax evasion increased during this time, as did the percentage of Americans considering taxes unfair, even as tax rates remained stable. Moreover, those Americans presumably having the lowest incentives to cheat were most likely to consider taxes unfair. This information leads the author to conclude that a growing sense that taxes are unfair is more likely than increasing tax rates and one's level of income to lead to tax evasion.