Policy change is a fundamental object of interest in social sciences, and in higher education too. This essay presents several reflections for a comparative research strategy on policy change in higher education from a political science point of view. Three basic assumptions are developed: politics is not only power but also research for solutions to collective problems; the explanation of policy change calls for configurative models able to enlight the relationship between structural and individual factors; the concept of network is a fruitful analytical lens to measure and map such relationships. According to these assumptions, the author tries to emphasise how even if absolutely significant the explanative models based on macro-factors have important shortcomings in view of the diversity and the complexity of policy changes in the different national experiences. Then, the proposal is to complement the macro-approaches by analysing of the policy-making processes and the logic of action of all the actors involved. The macro-factors shape the context of micro-behaviour, restricting the alternative of choice, but the choice itself is a matter of actors.
Comparing public policies: Issues and choices in six industrialized countries
Jan 2001
J R Adolino
C H Blake
Adolino, J.R., & Blake, C.H. (2001). Comparing public policies: Issues and choices in six industrialized countries. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Javna dobra i političko odlučivanje. Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti
Jan 2001
Z Petak
Petak, Z. (2001). Javna dobra i političko odlučivanje.
Zagreb: Fakultet političkih znanosti.
Higher education, the emerging market, and the public good
Jan 2002
105-126
B Pusser
Pusser, B. (2002). Higher education, the emerging
market, and the public good. In P. Albjerg Graham
& N.G. Stacey (Eds.), The Knowledge economy
and postsecondary education. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press, str. 105-126.