Content uploaded by Nima Nezafati
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Nima Nezafati on Feb 12, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Open Journal of Geology, 2014, 4, 582-597
Published Online November 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojg
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2014.411043
How to cite this paper: Hajibapir, G., et al. (2014) Application of Different Image Processing Techniques on Aster and ETM+
Images for Exploration of Hydrothermal Alteration Associated with Copper Mineralizations Mapping Kehdolan Area (East-
ern Azarbaijan Province-Iran). Open Journal of Geology, 4, 582-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2014.411043
Application of Different Image Processing
Techniques on Aster and ETM+ Images for
Exploration of Hydrothermal Alteration
Associated with Copper Mineralizations
Mapping Kehdolan Area (Eastern
Azarbaijan Province-Iran)
Golchin Hajibapir1, Mohammad Lotfi2, Afshar Zia Zarifi3, Nima Nezafati1
1Department of Geology, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Geology, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3Mining Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan Branch, Lahijan, Iran
Email: g.hajibapiir@gmail.com
Received 23 September 2014; revised 20 October 2014; accepted 13 November 2014
Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
The Kehdolan area is located at 20 kilometers to the south-east of Dozdozan Town (Eastern Azar-
baijan Province). According to structural geology, volconic rocks are situated in Alborz-Azarbyjan
zone, and faults are observed in the same direction to this system with SE-NW trend. The results
show that kaolinite alteration trend with Argilic and propylitic veins is the same direction with
SW-NE faults in this area. Therefore, these faults with these trends can be considered as the mine-
ralization control for determination of the alterations. Different image processing techniques,
such as false color composite (FCC), band ratios, color ratio composite (CRC), principal compo-
nent analysis (PCA), Crosta technique, supervised spectral angle mapping (SAM), are used for
identification of the alteration zones associated with copper mineralization. In this project
ASTER data are process and spectral analysis to fit for recognizing intensity and kind of argillic,
propylitic, philic, and ETM+ data which are process and to fit for iron oxide and relation to metal
mineralization of the area. For recognizing different alterations of the study area, some chemical
and mineralogical analysis data from the samples showed that ASTER data and ETM+ data were
capable of hydrothermal alteration mapping with copper mineralization. Copper mineralization in
the region is in agreement with argillic alteration. SW-NE trending faults controlled the minerali-
G. Hajibapir et al.
583
zation process.
Keywords
Kehdolan Area, False Color Composite, Band Ratios, Color Ratio Composite, Principal Component
Analysis, Crosta Technique, Supervised Spectral Angle Mapping, ASTER Data, ETM+ Data,
Alteration
1. Introduction
ASTER satellite data processing for mineralization mapping was used to detect alteration and detect mineral ex-
ploration targets [1] [2]. ASTER is the Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer, a
multi-spectral sensor onboard one of NASA’s Earth Observing System satellites, Terra, which was launched in
1999. ASTER sensors measure reflected and emitted electromagnetic radiation from earth’s surface and atmos-
phere in 14 channels (or bands). There are three groups of channels: three recording visible and near infrared
radiation (VNIR) at a spatial resolution of 15 m; six recording portions of shortwave infrared radiation (SWIR)
at a spatial resolution of 30 m; and five recording thermal infrared radiation (TIR) at a resolution of 90 m. The
higher spectral resolution of ASTER (compared to Landsat, for example—Figure 1) especially in the shortwave
infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum makes it possible to identify minerals and mineral groups such
as clays, carbonates, silica, iron-oxides and other silicates. An additional backward-looking band in the VNIR
makes it possible to construct digital elevation models from bands 3 and 3b. ASTER swath width is 60 km (each
scene is 60 × 60 km) which makes it useful for regional mapping [3].
There are a few things to note when using ASTER imagery for regional mineralogical mapping. Firstly, cloud
cover, vegetation and atmospheric effects can severely mask or alter surface signals in this project ASTER,
ETM+ data to correct with log residuals calibration method at ENVI 5/1 software [4] [5]. Secondly, bands and
band ratios do not indicate the occurrence of a mineral with absolute certainty or with any idea of quantity, so
this step is essential on ground truth and set appropriate thresholds. Thirdly, every terrain is different, so ratios
which work in some areas for a particular mineral or assemblage may not show the same thing elsewhere. As a
result of these factors, it is important not to look at ASTER images in isolation from other data. If possible, da-
tasets such as geology and structural maps, geochemistry, PIMA analyses (ground truthing), radiometrics, and
Figure 1. Distribution of ASTER and Landsat channels with respect to the elec-
tromagnetic spectrum.
G. Hajibapir et al.
584
any other available data should be used in conjunction with ASTER for best results [6] [7]. Several methods
have been conducted for recognizing different alterations with ASTER data. Different image processing tech-
niques such as false color composite, band ratios, color ratio composite, principal component analysis, Crosta
technique, supervised spectral angle mapping, and neural network classification are used for identification of the
alteration zones associated with copper mineralization. The principal component analysis (PCA), Crosta tech-
nique, and supervised spectral angle mapping (SAM) method seem to be equally applicable to all cases for de-
tecting alteration zone and minerals. In this study, concentration-area, Crosta technique, and supervised spectral
angle mapping method were used [6] [8].
2. Concentration-Area
In recent years, application of remote sensing in mineral exploration had been developed and becoming an im-
portant tool. Most important capability of satellites in mining exploration is recognizing altered area. Because of
close spatial relationship between mineral deposits and alteration, mineral mapping based of satellite data acce-
lerate the exploration and reduce the cost [8].
The principal component analysis (PCA), Crosta technique to know by person in 1901, in 1933 Helting sug-
gested to calculate method [9] [10]. The target enter variable p of X1 ... Xp, and know compound of p for com-
ponent Z1 ... Zp, do not correlation [9] [11]-[15]. Classification supervised spectral angle mapping (SAM) need
to ROI educationa file. SAM method by reason angel pixel to fabricate in N dimention with coordinates axise
[16] [17].
3. Geological Setting of the Case Studies
The Studies area is located at 20 kilometers south-east of Dozdozan Town (Eastern Azarbaijan Province). Ac-
cording to structural geology, volconic rocks are situated in Alborz-Azarbyjan zone, and faults observe in same
direction to this system with SE-NW trend that these are cut off with new faults with SW-NE trend. The results
show that kaolinite alteration trend with Argilic and propylitic veins are same direction with SW-NE faults in
this area.
Therefore, these faults with these trends can be considered as the mineralization control for determination of
the alterations. Oldest rock types in the area are Eocene Andesit-Basalt.
There are Eocene-Oligocene sedimentary units including: marl, Nummolitic sandy limestone, Tuff breccia.
There are Oligocene Syenit dyke as in central parts of the study. Geology map digiting for Arc Gis 10 soft
waer (Figure 2). The result ETM+ image processing techniques by False color composite (FCC (band 7, 4, 2))
show: pink color (volcanic rock), red brown color (iron oxide-manganese oxide), gray blue, white color (clay
minerals) was capable with Geological unit and Fult at geological map [18] [19]. FCC (band 7, 4, 2) image
processing for ENVI 5/1 software (Figure 3).
4. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
ASTER, ETM+ image processing techniques by PCA for band (1 ... 9 ASTE), band (1 ... 7 ETM+) for exist al-
teration for ENVI 5/1 software was calculated. Light point exist ASTER PC2 Image to show Altration area with
band math 4/9 (Figure 4). Light point exist ASTER PC7 reverse image to show vegetation cover with band
math 3/2 (Figure 5). Light point exist ETM+ PC5 image show Argilic Altration area with band math 5/7
(Figure 6). Light point exist ETM+ PC7 reverse image show iron oxide with band math 3/1 (Figure 7). Special
vector matrise PCA ASTER, ETM+ (Table 1, Table 2) [20]-[23].
5. Crosta Technique for Special Mineral Evidend
Crosta technique for muscovite mineral at band (1, 6, 7, 9 ASTER image) was calculated (Table 3). Moscovite
mineral have high reflection at band 7 and high absorption at band 6 [24]-[28].
High light exist at PC3 reverse image capable muscovite mineal, target of philic altration (Figure 8).
Crosta technique for kaolinite mineral at band (5, 6, 7 ASTER image) was calculated (Table 4). Kaolinite
mineral have high reflection at band 7, 5 and high absorption at band 6 [26] [29] [30].
High light exist at PC1 image capable kaolinite mineal, target of Argilic altration (Figure 9).
G. Hajibapir et al.
585
Figure 2. Kehdolan geological map.
Figure 3. FCC (band 7, 4, 2) image (evident geological unit).
G. Hajibapir et al.
586
Figure 4. Altration image.
Figure 5. Vegetation cover image.
G. Hajibapir et al.
587
Figure 6. Argilic altration image.
Figure 7. Iron oxide image.
G. Hajibapir et al.
588
Table 1. Special vector matrise PCA ETM+.
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7
Band 1 0.399579 0.200875 0.493121 0.154518 0.488643 0.383517 0.383517
Band 2 0.371749 0.438192 −0.225847 0.587692 −0.518341 0.048603 0.048603
Band 3 0.237005 0.144606 0.495941 0.119490 0.104559 −0.570855 −0.570855
Band 4 0.386382 0.500228 −0.176357 −0.750152 −0.077181 −0.018619 −0.018619
Band 5 0.000011 0.224469 −0.612875 0.230287 0.689673 −0.150528 −0.150528
Band 6 −0.704753 0.667916 0.230542 0.026524 −0.003510 0.040896 0.040896
Band 7 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 −0.000000 −0.707107 0.707107
Table 2. Special vector matrise PCA ASTER.
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4 PC5 PC6 PC7 PC8 PC9
Band 1 −0.984200 −0.062615 −0.063883 −0.062453 −0.062168 −0.062412 −0.062469 −0.062665 −0.062121
Band 2 −0.176090 0.427395 0.372248 0.367633 0.328495 0.329038 0.318682 0.305686 0.318474
Band 3 0.008835 0.163848 0.858800 −0.213433 −0.168468 −0.195883 −0.202049 −0.225476 −0.177678
Band 4 0.015454 0.859775 −0.337544 0.066219 −0.128494 −0.143264 −0.159675 −0.223912 −0.171930
Band 5 −0.004572 0.202582 −0.073348 −0.863289 0.127182 0.092710 0.006612 0.208492 0.374177
Band 6 −0.002133 0.077985 0.013448 −0.128062 −0.249657 −0.084614 0.342275 0.655681 −0.600646
Band 7 0.000521 −0.014035 −0.015863 −0.185674 0.693815 0.259831 0.117439 −0.306588 −0.555335
Band 8 0.000742 −0.000442 0.007915 0.015152 −0.230679 0.752930 −0.571919 0.168557 −0.155203
Band 9 0.000018 0.005981 −0.001192 −0.120972 −0.479831 0.422817 0.608391 −0.453716 0.017819
Table 3. Special vector matrise band (1, 6, 7, 9 ASTER image).
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
Band 1 0.994043 0.063001 0.063059 0.062708
Band 2 −0.108979 0.583396 0.568724 0.569496
Band 3 −0.000019 −0.216552 −0.570891 0.791952
Band 4 −0.001215 −0.780247 0.588778 0.211078
Crosta technique for carbonates (Cholorit, Epidotes, Calcite) mineral at band (1, 7, 8, 9 ASTER image) was
calculated (Table 5). This mineral have high reflection at band 7, 9 and high absorption at band 8 [26] [29] [31].
High light exist at PC4 reverse image capable Carbonates mineal, target of prophilitic altration (Figure 10).
6. Supervised Spectral Angle Mapping (SAM)
The result ASTER, image processing techniques by supervised spectral angle mapping (SAM) method with 0/1
angle do spectral on CRC ((B5 + B7)/B6, (B4 + B6)/B5, (B7 + B9)/B8) ASTER image (Figure 11) [32]-[35].
The result target to (Philic, Argilic, Prophilic) Altration exist at study area. The result target four important altra-
tion area. Therefore NW area is case study [36]-[43]. SAM image to show excess Philic at NW, E trend and ca-
pable Foid rich Syeinogabro unit geology (Figure 12). SAM image to show excess Argilic at central by SW-NE
trend and capable major fault area, Altered Syeinit unit geology (Figure 13). SAM image to show excess Char-
bonates at NW, SW, E, E trend and capable Andesit-basalt, tuff with limeston study area unit geology (Figure
14). The CRC (B7/B5, B2/B1, B3/B1) image (ETM+) to show red color excess iron oxid (Magnetit) (Figure
15).
G. Hajibapir et al.
589
Figure 8. Moscovite mineral image.
Table 4. Special vector matrise band (5, 6, 7 ASTER image).
PC1 PC2 PC3
Band 1 −0.568074 −0.578693 −0.585154
Band 2 −0.437825 −0.389543 0.810287
Band 3 −0.696851 0.716498 −0.032077
7. Control with Geological Particulars, XRD, ICP, Doubly-Polished Thin Section,
Heavy Mineral
Altration the study area controlled by ICP sample and result obtained exist high copper and Fe element (Table 6)
three distribution for copper exist the probable anomaly and possible anomaly and field, distribution by geosta-
tisic method used. XRD sample result show (Table 7) that result showed clay mineral and Iron oxide. The coor-
dinates of sampling points in Kehdolan area show at Figure 16. Heavy mineral sample result showed (Table 8)
that native copper and iron oxide minerals.
Doubly-polished thin section result show at Figure 17, and result copper-iron mineralization. At all doubly-
polished thin section exist minerals: covellite and chalcosite (B, A-image), altered magnetite (C-image), pyrite
with Ti exsolution (E-image), bornite (D-image), altered magnetite with ilmenite exsolution (F-image), hematite
and chalcosite (G-image), covellite and pyrite (H-image).
G. Hajibapir et al.
590
Figure 9. Kaolinit mineral image.
Table 5. Special vector matrise band (1, 7, 8, 9 ASTER
image).
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
Band 1 0.994027 0.063058 0.063258 0.062707
Band 2 −0.109131 0.575296 0.571368 0.575033
Band 3 −0.000545 0.362833 0.453723 −0.813933
Band 4 −0.000410 −0.730350 0.680935 0.054011
Figure 10. Charbonates mineral image.
G. Hajibapir et al.
591
Figure 11. Final map (SAM).
Figure 12. Philic map (SAM).
G. Hajibapir et al.
592
Figure 13. Argilic map (SAM).
Figure 14. Cholorit map (SAM).
G. Hajibapir et al.
593
Figure 15. ETM+ iron oxide (Magnetite) image.
Table 6. ICP sample of Kehdolan area for Cu-Fe mineral.
Element X + s = field X + 2s = threshold X + 3s = probably anomaly
Cu 2367.29 4640.08 6912.87
Fe
41438.5
51844.5
62250.5
Sample name CU (PPM) Fe (PPM)
Kh-101
7699.63
Probable anomaly
38807
Field
Kh-102 133 Low field 23615 Low field
Kh-103
59
Low field
5516
Low field
Kh-106
5501
Threshold
4641
Low field
Kh-201 118 Low field 31320 Field
Kh-202
72
Low field
33415
Field
Kh-2-76 104 Low field 26200 Low field
Kh-2-78
7699.63
Probable anomaly
19500
Low field
Kh-2-96
5342
Threshold
32200
Low field
Kh-2-98 2247 Field 25800 Low field
Kh-2-99
352
Low field
31600
Field
Table 7. XRD sample of Kehdolan area.
Sample Major phase Minor phase Trace phase
KH-XRD-01 Sanidine Kaolinite
Ankerite Gypsum
Quartz Hematite
Montmorillonite
KH-XRD-02 Quartz Ankerite
Kaolinite
Sanidine
Hematite
Calcite
KH-XRD-03 Sanidine
Quartz
Kaolinite
G. Hajibapir et al.
594
Figure 16. The coordinates of sampling points.
Table 8. Heavy mineral sample of Kehdolan area.
Field No. (ppm) K-H-M-1 K-H-M-2 K-H-M-3 K-H-M-4 K-H-M-5
Magnetite 1657/60 1132/20 1547/09 1491/84 3374/40
Hematite 589/12 360/69 1104/60 820/56 1570/49
Epidotes 588/00 960/00 735/00 136/50 870/83
Biotite 3/36 0/00 0/00 0/00 0/00
Pyrite oxide 28/00 34/29 350/00 19/50 248/81
Limonite 196/00 24/00 245/00 13/65 174/17
Martite 291/20 35/66 728/00 608/40 1035/05
Pyrite 20/00 20/00 0/21 0/47 0/03
Chalcopyrite 0.01 (4) 0.01 (4) 0/00 0/00 0.01 (2)
Native copper 0.01 (1) 0.01 (1) 0/00 0/00 0.01 (1)
Carbonates 10/84 0/12 12/65 0/08 24/52
Altered minerals 912/00 1144/29 854/00 567/00 232/07
Light minerals 0/00 0/09 9/33 0/06 18/10
(Namber mineral)
G. Hajibapir et al.
595
Figure 17. Doubly-polished thin section of Kehdolan area.
8. Conclusion
Investigation shows that ETM+ data due to its blue region spectral band can enhance the iron oxide rich areas
much better than ASTER data. ASTER data due to its various spectral bands in the short wave infrared are more
capable of enhancing clay bearing areas. The results showed that Crosta technique, supervised spectral angle
mapping better method for enhancing alteration at ASTER data. Results obtained by study on Kehdolan area in-
dicate the potential use of the ASTER data to fit for kind alteration of argillic, propylitic, philic, and ETM+ data
are to fit for the iron oxide and relation to metal mineralization of the area. The study area Argilic alteration ex-
pands that relationship with mineralization copper which is the same direction with SW-NE faults in this area
and relationship with Oligocene Syenit dyke unit as in central parts of the study. Result study for control with
geological particulars, showed more probable anomaly distribution copper mineralization.
Acknowledgements
The paper was supported by Islamic Azad University, Science and research branch. The authors wish to ac-
knowledge the research deputy of Azad University, Science and Research Branch for supporting of this study.
The authors would like to thank the editors and reviewers of this paper for their comments and valuable remarks.
References
[1] Legge, C.A. (1997) Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System. Published in Association with PRAXIS
G. Hajibapir et al.
596
Publishing, 137.
[2] Abrams, M. (2002) ASTER User Handbook. Jet Propulsion Lab, California, 135.
[3] Abrams, M.J., Brown, L., Lepley, R. and Sadowski, P. (1983) Remote Sensing for Porphyry Copper Deposits in
Southern Arizona. Economic Geology, 78, 591-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.78.4.591
[4] Volesky, C.J., Stern, J.R. and Abdelsalam, G.M. (2002) Mineral Exploration Using ASTER and Landsat Data.
[5] Lillesand, T.M., Kiefer, R.W. and Chipman, J.M. (2004) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 5th Edition, John
Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 763 p.
[6] Ninomiya, Y. and Fu, B. (2005) Detecting Lithology with Advanced Space-Borne Thermal Emission and Reflectance
Radiometer (ASTER) Multispectral Thermal Infrared “Radiance-at-Sensor” Data. Journal of Remote Sensing of Envi-
ronment, 99, 127-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.06.009
[7] Richards, J.A. (1999) Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03978-6
[8] Crosta, A.P., Souza Filho, C.R., Azevedo, F. and Brodie, C. (2003) Targeting Key Alteration Minerals in Epithermal
Deposits in Patagonia, Argentina, Using ASTER Imagery and Principal Component Analysis. International Journal of
Remote Sensing, 24, 4233-4240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0143116031000152291
[9] Sabins, F.F. (1999) Remote Sensing for Mineral Exploration. Ore Geology Reviews, 14, 157-183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-1368(99)00007-4
[10] Vincent, R.K. (1997) Fundamentals of Geological and Environmental Remote Sensing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle
River, 370 p.
[11] Pearson, K. (1901) On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space. Philosophical Magazine, 2, 559-
572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14786440109462720
[12] Ranjbar, H., Honarmand, M. and Moezifar, Z. (2004) Application of the Crosta Technique for Porphyry Copper Alte-
ration Mapping, Using ETM Data in the Southern Part of the Iranian Volcanic Sedimentary Belt. Journal of Asian
Earth Sciences, 24, 237-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2003.11.001
[13] Honarmand, M., Ranjbar, H. and Shahabpour, J. (2012) Application of Principal Component Analysis and Spectral
Angle Mapper in the Mapping of Hydrothermal Alteration in the Jebal-Barez Area, Southeastern Iran. Resource Geol-
ogy, 62, 119-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-3928.2012.00184.x
[14] Jolliffe, I.T. (2002) Principal Component Analysis, Series: Springer Series in Statistics. 2nd Edition, Springer, New
York.
[15] Sabins, F.F. (1997) Remote Sensing for Mineral Exploration. 3rd Edition, Freeman and Company, New York, 494 p.
[16] Thompson, A.J.B., Phoebe, L.H. and Audrey, J.R. (1999) Alteration Mapping in Exploration: Application of Short-
Wave Infrared (SWIR) Spectroscopy. Society of Economic Geologists’ Newsletter, 39, 1-27.
[17] Mather, P.M. (2001) Computer Processing of Remotely-Sensed Images. An Introduction. 2nd Edition, John Wiley &
Sons, Hoboken, 32.
[18] Rowan, L.C. and Mars, J. (2003) Lithologic Mapping in the Mountain Pass, California Area Using Advanced Space-
borne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, 350-366.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00127-X
[19] Patra, S.K., Shekher, M., Solanki, S.S., Ramachandran, R. and Krishnsn, R. (2006) A Technique for Generating Natu-
ral Colour Images from False Colour Composite Images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, 2977-2989.
[20] Davis, J.C. (1986) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, 646 p.
[21] Gupta, R.P. (2003) Remote Sensing Geology. 3rd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 655.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-05283-9
[22] Crosta, A.P. and Moore, J.M. (1989) Enhancement of Landsat Themetic Mapper Imagery for Residual Soil Mapping in
SW Minas Gerais State, Brazil: A Prospecting Case History in Greenstone Belt Terrain. Proceedings of the 7th The-
matic Conference on Remote Sensing for Exploration Geology, Calgary, 2-6 October 1989, 1173-1187.
[23] Jensen, J. (2000) Remote Sensing of the Environment, an Earth Resource Perspective. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff,
544 p.
[24] Palomera, R.P.A. (2002) Application of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System for Mineral Predictive
Mapping, Deseado, Southern Argentin. M.Sc. Thesis, ITC, Holland.
[25] Dr. Konter and Dr. Hurtado (2008) Spectral Mapping Methods: Indices and Supervised Classification. Geophysics
5336: Digital Image Processing Lab 7.
[26] Ranjbar, H., Shahriari, H. and honarmand, M. (2003) Comparison of Aster and ETM+ Data for Exploration of Por-
phyry Copper Mineralization: A Case Study of Sar Cheshmeh Areas, Kerman, Iran. Map Asia, 28.
G. Hajibapir et al.
597
[27] Rojas, A.S. (2003) Predictive Mapping of Massive Sulphide Potential in the Western Part of the Escomb Terrian, Cuba.
M.Sc. Thesis, ITC, Holland.
[28] Azizi, H., Rsaouli, A.A. and Babaei, K. (2007) Using SWIR Bands from Aster for Discrimination of Hydrothermal
Altered Minerals in the Northwest of Iran (SE-Sanandaj City), a Key for Exploration of Copper and Gold Mineraliza-
tion. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 6, 763-768.
[29] Tangestani, M.H. and Moore, F. (2002) Porphyry Copper Alteration Mapping at the Meiduk Area, Iran. International
Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 4815-4825.
[30] Yetkin, E. (2003) Altration Mapping by Remote Sensing: Application to Hasandag-Mineraliz Volcanic Complex. M.Sc.
Thesis, The Middle East Technical University, Turkey.
[31] Carranza, E.J.M. (2002) Geologically-Constrained Mineral Potential Mapping (Examples from the Philippines). Ph.D.
Thesis, Technical University Delft, Holland.
[32] Di Tommaso, I. and Rubinstein, N. (2007) Hydrothermal Alteration Mapping Using ASTER Data in the Infiernillo
Porphyry Deposit, Argentina. Ore Geology Reviews, 32, 275-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2006.05.004
[33] Lillesand, T. and Keifer, R. (2000) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New
York, 12-14.
[34] Patricia, S., Crosta, A. and De Souza, C.A. (2003) Remote Sensing Signature of the Morro Do Ouro Gold Deposit,
Minas Gerais, Brazil, Using Reflectance Spectrometry: Application to Mineral Exploration Using Spaceborne Multis-
pectral Sensors. Revista Brasileira de Geociencias, 33, 221-227.
[35] Kruse, F.A., Lefkoff, A.B., Boardman, J.B., Heidebrecht, K.B., Shapiro, A.T., Barloon, P.J. and Goetz, A.F.H. (1993)
The Spectral Image Processing System (SIPS)—Interactive Visualization and Analysis of Imaging Spectrometer Data.
Remote Sensing of Environment, 44, 145-163.
[36] Van der Meer, F. and De Jong, S. (2003) Imaging Spectrometery. Basic Principles and Prospective Applications.
Kluwer Achademic Publishers, Dordrecht, 35.
[37] Lillesand, T.M. and Keifer, R.W. (2000) Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons,
New York, 724 p.
[38] Kalinowski, A. and Oliver, S. (2004) Aster Minerslindex Processing, Manual. Remote Sensing Application Geosciense,
36.
[39] Ranjbar, H., Roonwel, G.S. and Ravidran, K.V. (2001) Digital Image Processing for Lithological and Alteration Map-
ping, Using Spot Multispectral Data, a case Study of Pariz Area, Kerman Province, Iran. Scientific Quaternary Journal,
31.
[40] Clark, R.N., Swayze, G.A., Gallagher, A., King, T.V.V. and Calvin, W.N. (1993) The U.S. Geological Survey, Digital
Spectral Library: Version 1:02 to 3 μm. United States Geological Survey, Open File Report 93-592, 1326 p.
[41] Vincent, P.K. (1997) Fundamental of Geological and Environmental Remote Sensing. Prentice Hall, 370 p.
[42] Fujisada, H., Iwasaki, A. and Hara, S. (2001) ASTER Stereo System Performance. Proceedings of SPIE, The Interna-
tional Society for Optical Engineering 4540, Toulous, 39-49.
[43] Rowan, L.C., Schmidt, R.G. and Mars, J.C. (2006) Distribution of Hydrothermally Altered Rocks in the Reko Diq, Pa-
kistan Mineralized Area Based on Spectral Analysis of ASTER Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104, 74-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.05.014