ArticlePDF Available

Humanities and social scientific research methods in porn studies

Authors:

Abstract

Porn studies researchers in the humanities have tended to use different research methods from those in social sciences. There has been surprisingly little conversation between the groups about methodology. This article presents a basic introduction to textual analysis and statistical analysis, aiming to provide for all porn studies researchers a familiarity with these two quite distinct traditions of data analysis. Comparing these two approaches, the article suggests that social science approaches are often strongly reliable – but can sacrifice validity to this end. Textual analysis is much less reliable, but has the capacity to be strongly valid. Statistical methods tend to produce a picture of human beings as groups, in terms of what they have in common, whereas humanities approaches often seek out uniqueness. Social science approaches have asked a more limited range of questions than have the humanities. The article ends with a call to mix up the kinds of research methods that are applied to various objects of study.
Humanities and social scientific research methods in porn studies
Alan McKee
Abstract
Porn studies researchers in the humanities have tended to use different research methods from
those in social sciences. There has been surprisingly little conversation between the groups
about methodology. This article presents a basic introduction to textual analysis and statistical
analysis, aiming to provide for all porn studies researchers a familiarity with these two quite
distinct traditions of data analysis. Comparing these two approaches, the article suggests that
social science approaches are often strongly reliable – but can sacrifice validity to this end.
Textual analysis is much less reliable, but has the capacity to be strongly valid. Statistical
methods tend to produce a picture of human beings as groups, in terms of what they have in
common, whereas humanities approaches often seek out uniqueness. Social science
approaches have asked a more limited range of questions than have the humanities. The
article ends with a call to mix up the kinds of research methods that are applied to various
objects of study.
Keywords
pornography, methodology, quantitative, qualitative, textual analysis, statistical analysis,
reliability, validity
Introduction
In 2011, Associate Professor John D Foubert of Oklahoma State University wrote in the
journal Sex Addiction and Compulsivity that ‘It is difficult to find a methodologically sound
study that shows a lack of some kind of harm when men view pornography’ (Foubert, Brosi
and Bannon 2011, 213-214). In the area of porn studies, methodology – the study of research
methods – is particularly important. Foubert’s claim refers to quantitative research in the
discipline of Psychology. But there exist other research methods in other Disciplines which
produce quite different forms of knowledge. Foubert’s comment suggests that he is not
familiar with the variety of research methods available to researchers in Porn Studies, and
this is not uncommon. There has been surprisingly little discussion between researchers who
1
use statistical research methods and humanities researchers who use approaches like textual
analysis about the ways in which their research methods function, the different ways in which
they produce knowledge, and the implications of these epistemological differences for our
understandings of pornography as a phenomenon. This article aims to contribute to just such
a discussion.
How to read this article
This article takes a slightly unusual approach. It starts by presenting a basic introduction to
one of the key methods of data analysis from the humanities – textual analysis – and one of
the key methods of the social sciences – statistical analysis - so that readers by the end of the
article will, hopefully, have an understanding of each of them. The risk with such an approach
is that many readers will already be consummate practitioners of textual analysis – for them
that section will feel like something targeted at undergraduate students rather than something
suitable for an academic research journal. But hopefully, for those readers, the discussion of
statistical methods might be original and useful. Conversely, for other readers who have been
practising statistical methods of data analysis for thirty years, the section of the article
introducing those methods will feel embarrassingly familiar. But hopefully, for them, the
section on textual analysis will be illuminating. It is my hope that by the end of the article
there will be few readers who feel that they have not learned anything about research
methods: and an increased number of readers who feel that they now have a basic
understanding of both textual and statistical modes of analysis. I then go on to identify a
number of differences between humanities and social scientific approaches to porn studies;
and make a call to mix-up our research methods and objects of study.
Why write about research methods?
I’ve been researching and publishing on pornography since 1997. In those sixteen years I’ve
done many different things with pornography. My first degree was in Film studies, and I
began by subjecting pornographic films to the same kinds of textual analysis that I had been
trained to apply to film noir, musicals and German expressionism (McKee 1997). Then I
applied for, and won, my first research grant, to study pornography in Australia from the
perspectives of production, content and consumption. This lead me to explore a series of
other approaches to pornography – including quantitative analyses of the texts of
2
pornography alongside surveys and interviews to gather data about the ways in which it was
made and the ways in which it was consumed (McKee, Albury and Lumby 2008). I moved to
QUT, a University which led the way in Australia in analyses of cultural policy, and so found
myself exploring what would happen if you tried to take a governmental policy-studies
analysis to pornography (McKee 2001). I had always been interested in entertainment more
generally, and my interest in the aesthetic systems employed in the evaluation of
entertainment by its consumers led me to edit a collection which included a chapter exploring
the aesthetic system of pornography (McKee 2007). As I explored the ways in which it is
possible to study pornography, and the ways in which different methods of data gathering and
data analysis produced different kinds of information – indeed, in some ways, produced
different objects of study, and different meanings of the word ‘pornography – I published
some of my insights into these issues (McKee 2009).
And so it was with delight that I received an invitation from Clarissa Smith and Feona
Attwood to contribute to this journal an article about research methods for studying
pornography. I have written before about some of the philosophical differences underlying
social scientific and humanities approaches to studying pornography (McKee 2009) and so in
this article I take a slightly different approach. As I suggest above, there has been surprisingly
little conversation between porn studies researchers from different disciplines about their
practices of data gathering and analysis. In this article I wanted to provide at least some sense
for practitioners of textual analysis and of statistical analysis of what it is that the other does.
In the genre of the academic journal article it isn’t possible to provide an overview of every
possible research method and its relationship to porn studies (I did try that in the first draft of
this article, resulting in a piece that discussed twenty seven different methods and was over
10,000 words long, dismissed by referees as unreadable and the editors of this journal as
unpublishable). It is for this reason that I chose to provide a brief introduction to textual
analysis and statistical analysis, to illustrate the use of these methods in porn studies, and to
take them as a starting point for a discussion of the implications of these different approaches.
Textual analysis
Textual analysis is one of the key research methods of the humanities. Despite this fact it’s
difficult to find a straightforward description of what textual analysis, or a step-by-step guide
as to how to do it. The humanities have not traditionally been rigorous in reflecting on or
3
accounting for their own research methods. I was once asked to write a guide to doing textual
analysis (see McKee 2003) and in the course of writing it I realized that there are a series of
different forms of textual analysis in the humanities which – at least in my experience – are
not generally made explicit as research methods. So in this article I draw out what seem to me
to be four common types of textual analysis – even if they are not usually recognized as such.
I should emphasise that these are not familiar or settled research methods. This is exploratory
writing.
i) Textual analysis (ideological): The first of my forms of textual analysis is ideological.
Such an approach looks for hidden ideologies in a text – such as patriarchy, racism,
heteronormativity, and so on. This form of textual analysis is characterized by a lack of
interest in the surface level of what texts appear to be saying, and also a lack of interest
in what interpretations audiences say they make of texts. This approach also tends to
look for negative interpretations of a text – no matter how positive a text might appear
on the surface, ideological textual analysis aims to find a negative reading (Albury
2009, 648). This approach to the study of pornography has been extremely popular. In
one example, Jensen and Dines conducted an ‘interpretive analysis’ of fourteen
pornographic videos, at each point looking for a negative interpretation of material. For
example, they found that there were no videos in their sample that included rape scenes
– and they describe this finding in the following way:
While some pornographic videos portray women as reluctant or prudish, in need
of being coaxed or coerced into having sex, the women in the videos in our
sample never said no and were always immediately ready for sexual activity … In
short, virtually all women in the videos were portrayed as ‘nymphomaniacs
(Jensen and Dines 1998, 73)
At each point where a number of interpretations are possible – for example, the fact
that there is no coercion of women in the sample of videos analysed could be
interpreted as a sign of women’s consent or agency – ideological textual analysis seeks
a negative interpretation.
ii) Textual analysis (poststructural). The second form of textual analysis I propose is
poststructural – by which I mean an analysis of a text that makes an informed guess
about the meanings of that text made by the audiences who consume it (I explain why I
use the term 'poststructural' for this form of textual analysis in McKee 2003, 9-13).
4
This form of textual analysis is interested in surface meanings, believing that these
provide us with useful information about how populations make sense of their world
(as to the question, if we’re interested in the meanings that audiences actually make of
texts, we don’t just interview them to find out rather than doing textual analysis? see
Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide, pages 83-89). In an instance of this kind of
textual analysis Margaret Henderson analyses two lesbian-produced Australian
pornographic magazines, Wicked Women and Slit. She considers the texts themselves,
the genre in which they operate, the industrial context of their production, their likely
audiences and the wider cultural context, and uses this information to produce situated
interpretations of the texts to support her argument that these magazines ‘put
pornography in the service of lesbians to de/mystify lesbian flesh: to show lesbians the
real and unreal relations of the lesbian and her kind’ (Henderson 2013, 178).
iii) Textual analysis (appreciation): this form of textual analysis is most common in the
disciplines of literary studies, film studies and visual arts. Writers taking this approach
celebrate the text (often understood as a work of art), talking about its beauty or other
aesthetic achievements. In academic studies of pornography it’s rare to find this form
of textual analysis applied to pornographic texts themselves. Mark McLelland’s chapter
‘The best website for men how have sex with men’, which takes the form of an
appreciation of a sexually explicit website, might be a taken as an example of this
category:
I enjoy CFS primarily as a discursive space – it offers me visual, but importantly,
narrative pleasure. It is a subversive space – as insulting to mainstream
heterosexual norms as it is to a new homonormative gay orthodoxy that sees gay
‘liberation’ in assimilating those very norms. In other words, CFS is fully sick
(McLelland 2007, 83)
iv) Textual analysis (exegesis): my final category of textual analysis (and I emphasise
again that these are not settled and broadly accepted categories – I developed them
when I returned to textual analysis as a method of analyzing data and tried to
understand exactly what academics do under that rubric) is exegesis. When using this
approach the writer explains the ideas that are put forward by a text. This approach is
most commonly used by academics in the analysis of books by other academics.
However, it is increasingly being applied to non-academic texts (as in Thomas
McLaughlin’s exegesis of the intellectual work of blues songs - McLaughlin 1996).
5
Kobena Mercer has taken this approach to pornography, for example, explaining the
intellectual work of Robert Mapplethorpe’s gay nudes:
… the shocking modernism that informs the ironic juxtaposition of elements
drawn from the repository of high culture – where the nude is indeed one of the
most valued genres in Western art history – can be read as a subversive
recording of the normative aesthetic ideal. In this view it becomes possible to
reverse the reading of racial festishism in Mapplethorpe’s work, not as a
repetition of racist fantasies but as a deconstructive strategy that lays bare
psychic and social relations of ambivalence in the representation of race and
sexuality (Mercer 1991, 186-187)
This approach may seem similar to textual analysis for appreciation. I would argue that
appreciation can take a number of forms, while exegesis is a subset of appreciation that
is particularly interested in the ideas that are offered by a text.
This approach can also include writing about pornography which refers only to
previous academic or activist writing about pornography but does not gather any new
data from outside those genres. For example, Ullen publishes an article where he
engages with the writing of philosopher Rae Langton, who claims that speech act
theory helps us to understand how pornography works. Ullen clarifies her ideas, and the
ideas of John Austin about speech act theory, in order to argue that Langton’s claim is
unconvincing (Ullen 2013).
Statistical analysis
Quantitative research is a key aspect of social scientific porn studies, and the use of statistical
analysis is a key element of quantitative research. Generally speaking the social sciences are
more rigorous than the humanities in their approach to research methods. Methods are
explicitly spelled out and taught to undergraduate students. It is expected in most pieces of
social science research that you will make explicit what methods of data gathering and
analysis were used to produce your results. The four forms of statistical analysis presented
below are likely to be familiar to most social scientists:
i) Statistical analysis: regression analysis. Regression analyses are used to quantify the
relationships between variables – particularly how a change in an independent
variable will affect a dependent variable. This has been the most common statistical
6
approach to studies in pornography, typically used to investigate whether exposure to
pornography is related to attitudes towards women or attitudes towards sex. Braun-
Courville and Rojas surveyed 433 adolescents, and then subjected the data to
regression analysis. They write that:
Binary logistic regression analyses revealed that adolescents exposed to [Sexually
Explicit Websites] were significantly more likely to have multiple lifetime sexual
partners, more than one sexual partner in the last three months, used alcohol or
other substances at last sexual encounter, and ever engaged in anal sex (Braun-
Courville and Rojas 2009, 159)
The biggest issue for pornographic research using regression analysis is the difference
between correlation – two things happen at the same time – and causality – one thing
causes the other to happen. Psychological research into pornography using statistical
methods has consistently confused correlation with causality. For example, Braun-
Colville and Rojas find that consuming pornography is related to various other sexually
permissive acts. And like all researchers who do cross-sectional surveys they state
explicitly that they can’t say anything about causality:
We are unable to establish whether exposure to sexually explicit materials leads
to engagement in sexual behavior or whether those individuals who partake in
more high-risk sexual behaviors also have a tendency to seek out sexually explicit
Web sites (Braun-Courville and Rojas 2009, 161)
But despite this explicit acknowledgement, they write their article – as do many
psychologists using statistical approaches to the effects of pornography – from the
assumption that it is pornography that is causing the other sexual behaviors, throughout
the paper making statements about ‘the Internet’s impact on adolescent sexual attitudes
and behaviors’ (Braun-Courville and Rojas 2009, 156) and claiming that ‘prolonged
exposure [to pornography] can lead to … sexually permissive attitudes’ (Braun-
Courville and Rojas 2009, 158). They do this even though, as they themselves note,
‘Whether visiting sexual explicit Web sites leads to engagement in high-risk sexual
behaviors or vice versa cannot be established from this study’ (Braun-Courville and
Rojas 2009, 160).]
ii) Statistical analysis: factor analysis and structural equation modeling. These forms of
statistical analysis are employed in exploratory work and allow researchers to
7
understand the structure of the data or reduce numbers of variables. For example Hald
surveyed 699 young heterosexual Danish adults to find out if there were gender
differences in situational, interpersonal and behavioral characteristics of pornography
consumption. He found that four variables of pornography consumption were highly
correlated – ‘average time of use per week, frequency of use, pornography
consumption when having sexual activity on one’s own and exposure patterns of
pornography within the last twelve months’ (Hald 2006, 580). He conducted factor
analysis on the four variables to see if they could be combined into a single measure –
‘Pornography consumption’ – and found that it was meaningful to use the single
measure.
iii) Statistical analysis: cluster analysis. Cluster analysis is used to organize respondents
into groups. Lottes surveyed 395 people to see if they formed coherent groups in
regard to their attitudes towards abortion, biological differences between the sexes,
pornography and what constitutes sexual normality (Lottes 1985). Applying a cluster
analysis she found that the sample fell into four groups. The first group had the most
permissive sexual attitudes - including towards pornography – were less likely to
believe that differences between the sexes were biological and reported the lowest
frequency of religious service attendance. The second group gave least support to
egalitarian gender role attitudes but ‘weak to high’ support to sexually permissive
views, favourable views on pornography, and weak support to abortion and
homosexuality. The third group reported a ‘moderate’ rate of religious service
attendance, had the highest support for egalitarian gender roles, low rates of
acceptance for pornography, and moderate support for abortion and homosexuality.
The fourth group had the highest rate of religious service attendance, the highest mean
age, low support to egalitarian gender role attitudes, and consistently sexually
restrictive attitudes. It was the only group that consistently disapproved of both
pornography and homosexuality and ‘attributed gender behaviorial differences more
to heredity than social conditioning’ (Lottes 1985, 417).
iv) Statistical analysis: analyses of variance. T-tests and ANOVA (analysis of variance)
are used to detect differences between groups of respondents. Lo and Wei surveyed
2628 college and high school students to see if the third person effect in relation to
Internet pornography (the belief that other people are more vulnerable to negative
effects than oneself) is mediated by gender. They asked respondents to ‘estimate the
8
likely negative effects of “surfing pornographic websites” on moral values, attitudes
towards the opposite sex, sexual knowledge, sexual attitudes and sexual behavior’ (Lo
and Wei 2002, 21). Applying a t-test to the results they found ‘female respondents
were more likely than male respondents to perceive other male students to be more
negatively influenced by Internet pornography’ (Lo and Wei 2002, 23-24).
Reliability and validity
As I noted above, the humanities have tended to be less rigorous in their methodology than
have the social sciences. Some concepts drawn from the vocabulary of social sciences
methodology can usefully be applied to humanities methods – and to the differences between
humanities and social sciences approaches to porn studies. The terms ‘reliability’ and
‘validity’ will be familiar to any readers trained in the social sciences – although their
application to a humanities method like textual analysis might not be. As for readers trained
in the humanities – it is perfectly possible to get through an entire program of research
training in the humanities (as I did) without ever being introduced to these terms (although
this might be less true for younger researchers – certainly the research training our PhD
students in my Creative Industries Faculty get these days is more rigorous than anything I
was ever exposed to).
And so, for those readers like me who may not have a familiarity with these terms, a brief
summary - reliability describes the extent to which a method will produce the same data each
time it is applied, regardless of who is doing the analysis. Validity describes the extent to
which data actually describes what’s happening in the situation that is being studied. Some
research methods are more ‘reliable’ than others, while some are more ‘valid’. Sometimes
these two characteristics can work together, but at others they can come into conflict. Take
the example of a statistical content analysis of pornography (where you count the number of
times a certain thing happens in pornography) compared with a textual analysis (where you
describe in words what happens in pornography). Content analysis has a high reliability –
once you have created a definition of what you’re counting, then, using the same collection of
pornographic movies, any researcher can come up with the same results. By contrast, textual
analysis relies more on individual expertise: if you were exploring the question ‘What are the
power relations in 1984 gay porn video Powertool?’ using textual analysis, two different
9
researchers could come up with two quite different answers, based on their knowledge of the
genre, audiences, visual language, and so on.
But, at the same, while content analysis can have high reliability it can also risk low validity.
The process of counting allows for little flexibility or nuance, and so once you have your
definition in place you have to keep on counting – even if the interpretations that you end up
making do not match the ways in which a text is interpreted in the real world. So if you are
counting aggression in pornography, for example, once you have your definition – say ‘any
purposeful action causing physical or psychological harm to oneself or another person
(Bridges et al. 2010, 1072) – then you have to count everything that might fall under that
definition. This would include consensual spanking for example – where one person asks that
another spanks them, and then says ‘I love that. It’s so sexy’. In a content analysis using the
above definition, this would have to be counted as an instance of aggression, even if it
doesn’t match up with what many people are concerned about when they say they want to
reduce violence in pornography. Content analysis doesn’t allow for such caveats - you just
find out that ‘On the whole, the pornographic scenes analyzed in this study were aggressive;
only 10.2% (n = 31) of scenes did not contain an aggressive act’ – even if most of them were
consensual (Bridges et al. 2010, 1075).
Common factors vs uniqueness
A second point about the different kinds of knowledge produced by a humanities approach
like textual analysis compared with a social scientific approach such as statistical analysis
concerns their different orientations towards similarity and difference. Large scale surveys
can provide a good sense of what large populations have in common but they’re not much
good at letting you understand the individual idiosyncrasies of how particular groups or
people make sense of the world – they favour commonality rather than uniqueness. On the
other hand, textual analysis is often applied to texts that are idiosyncratic rather than
representative – texts that show how things could be done differently, that are surprisingly
transgressive or creative or insightful. In those texts it is their very lack of representativeness
that is prized.
The kinds of questions asked
10
Finally it’s worth making explicit that research methods can only answer the questions that
the researcher asks. This is so obvious that it hardly bears mentioning – except for the
concomitant argument that therefore no research method can be objective. I’ve written before
about the different understandings of the concept of objectivity in the humanities and social
sciences (McKee 2009, 631-635). In the humanities it is now generally accepted that no piece
of research can be objective, in the sense of considering every possible point of view about an
area of study. By contrast, much social science work remains committed to the belief that
researchers can be properly impartial and let the facts speak for themselves. In reconciling
these approaches it’s useful to think about the questions that have been asked about
pornography. There exist hundreds of articles that use statistical methods to attempt to
discover whether consuming pornography causes men to have negative attitudes towards
women. But I haven’t come across any articles that use statistical attempt to discover whether
consuming pornography leads to more open levels of communication about sexuality, or to a
better level of acceptance of one’s sexual identity, or higher levels of sexual agency. The
studies that explore the question of whether consuming pornography causes men to have
negative attitudes towards women is good social science that gathers and analyses its data is
appropriate ways. But the research tradition in pornography can never be ‘objective’ in a
more everyday sense of that word because it can never ask every possible question about its
area of study. There will always be possible approaches, issues, voices and concerns that are
excluded from the research. Much of the statistical work on pornography has focussed on the
homogenous and the unitary – what is the (single) effect that pornography has on everyone
who consumes it?
By contrast, textual analyses of pornography have tended to address a wider range of
questions –exploring not only the ways in which pornography might represent women in
ways that are sexist or violent, but also representations of domesticity in amateur
pornography (Albury 1997), the porn star as brand (Nikunen and Paasonen 2007),
pornography and breastfeeding (Giles 2002) among many other topics. This is not to say that
there is any essence of textual analysis that makes it more suited to answering a wide range of
questions: it is rather that, historically, statistical forms of analysis in porn studies have
tended to focus on a more rigidly confined series of questions.
Conclusion
11
Associate Professor John D Foubert, following his contention that ‘It is difficult to find a
methodologically sound study that shows a lack of some kind of harm when men view
pornography’ (Foubert, Brosi and Bannon 2011, 213-214) goes on to use a t-test on survey
results to find that ‘men who saw mainstream pornography scored significantly higher on
self-reporting likelihood of raping and likelihood of committing sexual assault than men who
did not see mainstream pornography during the last 12 months’ (Foubert, Brosi and Bannon
2011, 221-222). But this is only one aspect of thinking about the relationships between
pornography, individual consumers, and the cultures and society within which it is consumed.
Clarissa Smith, for example, has suggested in her qualitative research a whole range of
responses that pornography might provoke – such as boredom, disappointment or
embarrassment (Smith 2002). At this moment in the history of porn studies I’m not aware of
any statistical work that attempts to measure the extent and importance of those responses to
the genre. But wouldn’t it be interesting to find out? What becomes clear from studying the
different research methods that are applied to pornography is that porn studies can benefit
from conversations about methodology across disciplines, and from more creative mixes of
research methods with objects of study. We are starting to see statistical methods applied to
original topics – such as the experiences of women who appear in pornography (Griffith et al.
2013). But there still remain many issues that have never been subject to statistical analysis,
and many aspects of textual analysis that could benefit from the rigour about methodology
typically applied in the social sciences. We have barely scratched the surface of the work to
be done – which is wonderful news to report in the first issue of a brand new journal devoted
to the area of Porn Studies.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery grant, ‘Young
people, sex and the media’, 2012-2014
My grateful thanks for Andrew Ward for his insights into the range of statistical methods
available. All responsibility for errors in understanding the material remains my own.
References
Albury, Kath. 2009. "Reading porn reparatively." Sexualities 12 (5): 647-653. doi:
10.1177/1363460709340373.
12
Albury, Katherine. 1997. "Homie-Erotica: Heterosexual Female Desire in the Picture." Media
International Australia (84): 19-27. Accessed September 6, 2013.
http://qut.summon.serialssolutions.com/link/0/eLvHCXMwY2BQSEpKAXZvEk0skyw
MkoEpAtSETTQCLc4xN0o1NUpCGWxDKs3dhBiYUvNEGZTdXEOcPXRBG9rjCyBn
LsQbWJiYAFsaZqDmBWi_pBgDbyJoCXheCXirWIo4A0tJUWmqOKgIFQcaJ87AEW
FpFOQXYRkA4QrBuHrF4O1MeoUl4sASGxzbuoZ6pgAzSyvq. doi:
<http://search.informit.com.au.ezp01.library.qut.edu.au/documentSummary;dn=0844
32660575059;res=IELLCC>.
Braun-Courville, Debra and Mary Rojas. 2009. "Exposure to sexually explicit websites and
adolescent sexual attitudes and behaviors." Journal of Adolescent Health 45 (2): 156-
162. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.12.004.
Bridges, Ana J, Robert Wosnitzer, Erica Scharrer, Chyng Sun and Racheal Liberman. 2010.
"Aggression and sexual behavior in best-selling pornography videos: a content
analysis update." Violence Against Women 16 (10): 1065-1085.
Foubert, John D., Matthew W. Brosi and R. Sean Bannon. 2011. "Pornography viewing
among fraternity men: Effects on bystander intervention, rape myth acceptance and
behavioral intent to commit sexual assault." Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 18 (4):
212-231. Accessed 14/02/2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2011.625552.
doi: 10.1080/10720162.2011.625552.
Giles, Fiona. 2002. "Fountains of love and loveliness: in praise of the dripping wet breast."
Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement 4 (1).
Accessed September 9, 2013.
Griffith, James D, Sharon Mitchell, Christian L Hart, Lea T Adams and Lucy L Gu. 2013.
"Pornography actresses: an assessment of the damaged goods hypothesis." Journal
of Sex Research. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.719168.
Hald, Gert Martin. 2006. "Gender differences in pornography consumption among young
heterosexual Danish adults." Archives of Sexual Behavior 35 (5): 577-585. doi:
10.1007/s10508-006-9064-0.
Henderson, Margaret. 2013. "Pornography in the service of lesbians: the case of 'Wicked
Women' and 'Slit' magazines." Australasian Journal of Popular Culture 2 (2): 159-
182. doi: 10.1386/ajpc.2.2.159_1.
Jensen, Robert and Gail Dines. 1998. "The content of mass-marketed pornography." In
Pornography: the production and consumption of inequality, edited by Gail Dines,
Robert Jensen and Anne Russo, 65-100. New York and London: Routledge.
Lo, Ven-hwei and Ran Wei. 2002. "Third-person effect, gender and pornography on the
Internet." Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 46 (1): 13-33. doi:
10.1207/s15506878jobem4601_2.
13
Lottes, Ilsa L. 1985. "The use of cluster analysis to determine belief patterns of sexual
attitudes." Journal of Sex research 21 (4): 405-421. doi:
10.1080/00224498509551278.
McKee, Alan. 1997. "Penetration and power." Media International Australia (84): 7-18.
McKee, Alan. 2001. "A cultural policy argument for government subsidies of gay porn
production in Australia." In Queer in the Twenty-First Century: The body - queer and
politic, edited by Keith J Atkinson and Justin J Finnerty, 118-137. Fortitude Valley,
Qld: Gay and Lesbian Welfare Association.
McKee, Alan. 2003. Textual Analysis: a beginner's guide. London: Sage.
McKee, Alan. 2007. Beautiful Things in Popular Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
McKee, Alan. 2009. "Social scientists don't say titwank." Sexualities 12 (5): 629-646.
McKee, Alan, Kath Albury and Catharine Lumby. 2008. The Porn Report. Melbourne:
Melbourne University Press.
McLaughlin, Thomas. 1996. Streets Smarts and Critical Theory: Listening to the vernacular.
Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
McLelland, Mark. 2007. "The best website for men who have sex with men:
cruisingforsex.com." In Beautiful Things in Popular Culture, edited by Alan McKee,
79-86. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Mercer, Kobena. 1991. "Skin Head Sex Thing: racial difference and the homoerotic
imaginary." In How Do I Look? Queer film and video, edited by Bad Object-Choices,
169-210. Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.
Nikunen, Kaarina and Susanna Paasonen. 2007. "Porn star as brand: pornification and the
intermedia career of Rakel Liekki." Velvet Light Trap (59): 30-40.
Smith, Clarissa. 2002. "'They're ordinary people, not aliens from the planet Sex!': the
mundane excitements of pornography for women". In Journal of Mundane Behavior.
Ullen, Magnus. 2013. "The solipsism of pornography: speech act theory and the anti-porn
position." Sexuality & Culture 17: 3210347. doi: 10.1007/s12119-012-9154-1.
14
... It provides multiple perspectives and a wider abundance of theoretical approaches to researchers that they would otherwise be less likely to encounter and grasp (Bindler et al. 2012). According to McKee (2014) humanities-based researchers of pornography have tended to use different methods to researchers in social sciences, and there has been little conversation between these groups. Humanities researchers more commonly deploy textual forms of analysis (McKee 2014), whereas social scientists have traditionally used quantitative methods that they consider to be more rigorous (McKee 2014). ...
... According to McKee (2014) humanities-based researchers of pornography have tended to use different methods to researchers in social sciences, and there has been little conversation between these groups. Humanities researchers more commonly deploy textual forms of analysis (McKee 2014), whereas social scientists have traditionally used quantitative methods that they consider to be more rigorous (McKee 2014). It could be said that large-scale surveys of pornography can provide a good overview of what populations have in common, while textual analysis and smaller-scale qualitative studies can provide a better detail of porn use idiosyncrasies (McKee 2014;McKee and Ingham 2018). ...
... Humanities researchers more commonly deploy textual forms of analysis (McKee 2014), whereas social scientists have traditionally used quantitative methods that they consider to be more rigorous (McKee 2014). It could be said that large-scale surveys of pornography can provide a good overview of what populations have in common, while textual analysis and smaller-scale qualitative studies can provide a better detail of porn use idiosyncrasies (McKee 2014;McKee and Ingham 2018). It is clear that research in pornography can benefit from interdisciplinary research that draws on a range of perspectives and methodologies, and that doing so will improve current understandings of pornography use. ...
Article
This paper explores some the difficulties in undertaking a large-scale systematic review of pornography research literature. Its authors come from different disciplines across the humanities and social sciences, and work within an interdisciplinary team. The research project aims to understand pornography's relationship with its audiences, particularly considering the relationship between pornography consumption and healthy sexual development. Offering a conversational account of research experiences on the project so far, the paper illustrates some key tensions and ongoing points of discussion in research committed to interdisciplinary scholarship, featuring disciplinary perspectives that do not easily correlate. We disagree on definitions, data-gathering methods and modes of data analysis. This paper does not aim to deliver solutions to these problems but presents two different voices describing our experiences of interdisciplinary porn research so far. In order to challenge and extend our disciplinary thinking, we offer an example of dialogue, and highlight the potential of listening across disciplinary frameworks. We encourage scholars from different disciplines to work together as this generates broader research perspectives and offers challenging conditions that can usefully interrogate and extend upon traditional research practice and methods. We hope this paper will generate further reflection among research peers about how best to strengthen interdisciplinary research practice, including, but not limited to, porn research.
... This echoes other researchers who have called for a broader exploration of the meaning behind current pornography use and remaining open to new perspectives offered by adolescents (e.g. Attwood and Smith 2011;McKee 2014;Alexandraki et al. 2018;Wright and Štulhofer 2019). ...
Article
This critical conceptual article focuses on how adolescent pornography use is commonly researched, examining the key assumptions made in researching pornography and its potential harm. The article first considers the contextual foundations involved in researching adolescents and pornography, which has a long history steeped in notions of indecency and protection. We examine empirical research in the field and how findings translated into media and policy outlets. This leads to the identification and critical discussion of three dominant assumptions in the field: that exposure leads to continued viewing; that increased viewing leads to harm; and that pornography provides the template for sexual practice. This analysis suggests that research has functioned under highly homogenized presumptions about adolescent pornography use and its effects. We argue that there is a fundamental need to broaden pornography research by directly engaging adolescents to include their perspectives in research and in the translation of research into policy and education.
Article
In this paper, we present data about how young adult writers respond to the criteria for, and examples of, healthy pornography. Data derive from a textual analysis prepared by four young adult writers aged 18-25 years, who were the majority of authors of this paper. They were recruited by the first author who circulated a call for expressions of interest on what was then called Twitter. The co-authors were paid A$500 to prepare 500 words of textual analysis on criteria for healthy pornography and four websites that were suggested by an expert panel as possibly supporting healthy sexual development for young adults. We then subjected these data to a meta-textual analysis to draw out key insights. Our perspectives on healthy pornography included poetry, activist writing and academic writing. The findings make clear the diversity of ideas and thoughts about this topic among 18-25-year-olds. This demonstrates the creativity of human interpretation, and how this informs the ways in which we engage with, make sense of and make use of pornography.
Chapter
This paper discusses the advantages and challenges of analyzing sexual images visually. It lays out the design of and experiences from collecting data at two national hotlines, who receive anonymous reports by “digital bystanders”: people who in their everyday life come across problematic sexual images online. To achieve nuanced data on how people respond to sexual images online, this study took a mixed-methods visual approach. Through quantitative content analysis and qualitative reading of the images, the grey zones of age, consent, and authenticity could be analyzed visually. Despite the ethical issues inherent in working with such sensitive images, I argue that they are vital in understanding how Internet users interact with illegal, legal, and grey zone images online.
Chapter
Working with criminology means working with sensitive topics, and being a criminologist means getting used to that. Interviews and figures about crime become regular parts of everyday working life, and some criminologists will experience a sense of desensitization. Still, we have never failed to be affected by the visual dimension of criminological research.
Chapter
Cultivation scholars engaged with critical theory and new forms of political criticism in the ‘post-Annenberg’ era. Nancy Signorielli nurtured a network of feminist scholars and maintained the cultural indicators project, paying particular attention to gender equality. Michael Morgan, widely credited with sharpening the mainstreaming concept, collaborated with critical qualitative scholars to make arguments about the dangers of US global media hegemony that Annenberg had discouraged. Signorielli and Morgan inspired Erica Scharrer, to carry cultural indicators and cultivation theory into the digital age. Scharrer has demonstrated how both models can be used to organise committed yet transparent analysis of how contemporary genres such as pornography and reality TV affect gender equality. Thus, cultivation theory and cultural indicators approaches exemplify how politically inspired research questions can be explored responsibly.
Thesis
Full-text available
Electronic advertisements have an important role in promoting different goods and services and presenting them to the consumer in an attractive way, using a set of creative methods to make the advertisement appear well to the consumer and motivate the consumer to buy preventive medical goods to prevent the Corona virus, The research problem revolves around a main question: Did electronic advertising help the consumer to purchase preventive medical goods during the period of the Corona pandemic? The goal of the research was to find out the extent of the success or failure of electronic advertisements in motivating the consumer to buy preventive medical goods related to the Corona pandemic, and to achieve the goal of the research, the researcher relied on the survey method, as for the research tool, it was a questionnaire tool to collect data and information that achieve the objectives of the study, and the researcher chose the study sample represented by the audience of the city of Baghdad, the center, the size of the research sample was 520 respondents, who were 18 years and over, both males and females. The research came out with several results, including the respondents' attitude that they purchased preventive medical goods related to the Corona pandemic by following up electronic advertisements at a very high rate for the alternative, I agree, 442 respondents has agreed with that, with a percentage of 85%, , which made it obtain the first place. The conclusion is that in times of crises, the demand for advertisements that succeed in employing crises increases by intensifying the broadcasting of messages, either educational or commercial, according to the crisis, and we suggest that advertisers should be directed to follow the correct scientific methods in forming the advertising message in times of crisis so that they can achieve their marketing goals.
Article
Full-text available
Despite the magnitude of its consumption by the general public, online pornography has to date received comparatively very little attention within linguistics. The paper explores the language in video titles on the pornographic site Pornhub using a corpus-driven approach. A corpus of 17,000 titles compiled specifically for the purposes of the study yielded a word list, which, together with an interdisciplinary literature review, was used to formulate two research questions. With gender as a key variable, the first research question focuses on the linguistic representation of agency by looking at verb objects, while the second examines expressions (nouns and adjectives) used to ascribe roles to the participants. A quantitative evaluation of the data indicates an interplay between gender and the observed features in both questions. The lexicalisation of agency was found to be more complex than previously thought; nine categories were found, and the role of passive voice differed depending on gender. As for gender characterisation, descriptions of women’s roles are not only more frequent but also more heterogenous and evaluative compared to those of men.
Article
This article discusses a nationally representative survey on the size and scope of porn use amongst young New Zealanders (aged 14–17 years) in the context of the body of quantitative research internationally. A total of 2071 respondents participated in a survey conducted by the Office of Film and Literature Classification in 2018, giving insight into usage, perceptions, and feelings regarding porn. In this article, we present an overview of the survey’s design and findings, comparing and contextualizing them with other surveys internationally, and reflect on the affordances and limitations of quantitative studies on young people’s experiences and perceptions of pornography. While this quantitative study has offered a clear and current picture of youth porn use and perceptions in New Zealand, it has also raised further questions to be explored through qualitative research methods for a more complete picture – one that can inform future policy and initiatives (including resources, education, and potential regulatory change).
Article
This thesis is a quantitative and qualitative study of University of Maine students attitudes and consumption habits of pornography. It contains a literature review of anti-pornography feminism from the Second Wave, as well as an overview of sex-positive and sex-critical theories of pornography from more recent years. The goal of the thesis is to understand how sex-negative and/or sex-positive ideas have or have not permeated college student’s understanding of pornography. Over 800 students were surveyed about pornography consumption through the Psychology Department’s Fall prescreen. 4 students from the survey, who all happened to be women, were interviewed about their relationships with sex and pornography. The findings of this study suggest that young adults (18+) have nuanced and multifaceted relationships with pornography. Men reported watching pornography at a higher frequency than women, but men and women both reported that they do not believe pornography is similar to real life sex. The interviews suggest a significant level of porn literacy and gender consciousness among consumers. It was found that participants were more likely to have sex-positive ideas about their own consumption habits than others’. Additionally, this research is significant because it serves as a pilot study for future sex-positive models in pornography research. The study also provides a lens through which feminism can be more inclusive of sex workers’ rights.
Article
Full-text available
Like art of the avant-garde, particular instances of pornography are claimed to do more than simply arouse: by offending bourgeois sensibilities they explode normative conceptions of sexuality. The focus on transgression tends to dismiss the thrills of 'ordinary' porn as inferior and in particular, for this paper, fails to address the experience of reading porn in the UK where legally available materials are characterized by their supposed uniformity and repetition. The attempt to distinguish between forms of pornography in terms of their ability to transgress social and sexual norms continues the obfuscation of actual use of sexually explicit materials. This paper deals with one woman's relationship with the UK soft-core magazine For Women, illustrating the necessity to recognize the ways in which access to and use of this particular instance of 'pornography for women' is governed by the magazine's construction of a form of 'ordinary' girlie-dom within its pages and by its appeal to women's sexual experience as excitingly routine. © 2002, Clarissa Smith and Journal of Mundane Behavior. All rights reserved.
Article
Full-text available
Article
Full-text available
In recent publications, Reiss has proposed three sexual ideologies that he believes represent major belief patterns of U.S. sexual attitudes: Traditional Romantic, Modern Naturalistic, and Abstinence. Reiss claims that adherents of each ideology would have predictable beliefs in the following four areas of public controversy: (a) abortion, (b) genetic differences between the sexes, (c) pornography, and (d) sexual normality. A 92‐item Likert format questionnaire, containing 16 scales constructed to measure both ideology and substantive beliefs, was administered to a sample of 259 students and 136 nonstudents. Using measures of ideology tenet belief as the clustering variables, four patterns of tenet and substantive area belief were identified. Two of these patterns corresponded to Reiss' Modern Naturalistic and Abstinence ideologies. The remaining two patterns, one popular with women and one with men, appear to be either separate ideologies or transitional patterns leading to acceptance of the Modern Naturalistic Ideology.
Article
Full-text available
Rakel Liekki ("Rachel Flame") is probably the best-known Finnish female porn performer. Her career has ranged from painting to hard-core videos, Web presence, mobile phone services, newspaper and magazine articles, and television shows. She is a performer, host, producer, and writer who has both appeared in various adult productions and realized her own visions of pornography. As a vocal public discussant on pornography and commercial sex, Liekki has exceptionally flexible media agency. Liekki's career is representative of the blurred boundaries between pornography and mainstream culture. No longer confined to the realm of shabby sex shops, pornography slides from one representational space to another and shifts increasingly toward mainstream popular culture. Porn's general visibility has increased in a process termed pornographication (Driver) or, for simpler spelling, pornification: the expansion and success of the porn industry and play with hard-core representations in fashion, advertising, and other fields of popular culture. In what follows we explore pornification as a reorganization of pornography's cultural position through analysis of Rakel Liekki's career. With pornification we do not refer to "pornication" or envision a contemporary culture of fornication in the throes of moralistic nostalgia toward some bygone days of chastity. Rather, we aim to figure transformations in the cultural position and status of porn that require a rethinking of its very concept (Nikunen, Paasonen, and Saarenmaa, Pornification). Doing research on contemporary pornography necessitates stepping away from film as the dominant medium and considering the "cross-platform" nature of pornography. Intermediality—"intertextuality transgressing media boundaries" (Lehtonen 71)—and multimodality characterize contemporary media at large, and pornography is no exception. Liekki's star image (Dyer 60) is intermedial by definition, yet some of her media appearances (television shows, interviews, and one adult film in particular) have been more pivotal in its construction than others. Focusing on Liekki's key media appearances (the television shows Porn Star and Night with Rakel, the DVD film Mun leffa, newspaper and magazine articles, as well as Liekki's Web presence), we argue that pornification is not merely a question of proliferating pornographic representations. Rather, Liekki's star image demonstrates the ways in which the intermedial ties of pornography both blur the boundaries of the genre and add to the general availability and visibility of pornography. In our reading of Liekki's star image the operations and implications of pornification are twofold. First, pornification provides spaces for media performances subverting the generic conventions of porn and facilitates novel representational spaces, ideas, and agencies. Second, and perhaps paradoxically, pornification also implies reiteration and recycling of representation conventions that are telling of the generic rigidity of porn. In this sense pornification has implications for pornography different from those for mainstream media. Liekki (born in 1979) started her career in pornography at the age of eighteen on a phone sex line. According to Liekki's Web site, her route to porn films was nevertheless paved by her education and practice in the visual arts: she began performing in porn videos in order to understand the world she was painting. Since graduating from a polytechnic art school in 2001 Liekki has held a few exhibitions, mostly addressing erotic themes. Although films were initially a side product of painting, Liekki eventually made eleven of them. Currently working as a television host and freelance writer, Liekki retired from porn films at the age of twenty-five. An ironically self-titled "porn-pensioner," she remains in the business as a producer, presenter, and host of events and exhibitions. She has an online video and image gallery and various mobile phone services. Liekki's versatile productions aside, her celebrity status is primarily the product of mainstream media appearances. Interviews with Liekki were published shortly after the premiere of the late-night television show Pornostara (Porn Star) on the cable channel MoonTV in 2002. The interviews depicted an intelligent, ambitious, and cheerful porn star, something of an exception in the Finnish publicity...
Chapter
You're The One That I WantCulture ClubSwooshification of the WorldI Knew You Were WaitingFreaks Like Me
Article
This article analyses the Australian lesbian sex magazines, Wicked Women (1988–1996) and Slit (2002–) to examine the nature and shape of Australian lesbian pornography magazines, and hence to explore the ways in which these publications put pornography in the service of lesbians. I outline the conditions of these magazines’ emergence, and then discuss the representational strategies of each, including imagery, layout, tropes and narratives. These magazines, and their changing modes of making lesbian porn, show the development of a lesbian porn aesthetic. Further, they offer a unique sight of the discursive construction of lesbian identities and communities across more than three decades, and reveal another facet of the troubled relationship between feminism and lesbians.
Article
Feminist thinking on pornography since the early 1980s has tended to polarize into ‘pro’ and ‘anti’ camps. Within both camps, there is a tendency to rely on moral frameworks that rely on either/or understandings of what pornography is, and what it does. This article draws on Michel Foucault’s theory of ethics to offer, in Eve Sedgwick’s terms, a reparative yet still critical model for feminist porn studies.
Article
The present essay takes as its point of departure the resurgence of the anti-porn argument claiming that pornography is harmful. It focuses especially on philosopher Rae Langton’s attempt to use speech act theory to defend the anti-porn position of Catherine MacKinnon. Langton’s argument is critiqued for assuming that we can ascertain the function of pornography without considering the situations of its use. It hence runs counter to the particularizing intent of speech act theory as such, which emphasizes the need to study speech in context. Rather than dismiss the anti-porn position Langton defends as faulty, the essay suggests that it remains an incontrovertible facet of the pornographic situation, and as such should be dialectically engaged. In the second half of the essay, therefore, the reasoning that informs the antiporn position is shown to be incompatible with the recurrent claim that porn is the expression of a male desire to dominate women. Rather, a closer look at Langton’s defense of the anti-porn argument helps us see that pornography is the expression of cognitive possibilities unique to the historical conditions that have brought it forth, and as such is every bit as self-conflicting as is capitalism itself.
Article
This study examined the role of gender in the third-person effect in the context of Internet pornography. The results indicate that most respondents believe Internet pornography has a greater negative influence on others than on themselves. Female respondents tend to perceive greater negative effects of Internet pornography on other males than on other females, and they are readier to support restrictions of Internet pornography. Finally, the magnitude of perceptual bias appears an unreliable predictor of support for media restriction, which may help explain the mixed results in previous studies. This novel gender-differential approach strengthens the growing literature on the third-person effect.