ArticlePDF Available

Geometric algebra, qubits, geometric evolution, and all that

Authors:
  • SOiGUINE Supercomputing

Abstract

The approach initialized in [1], [2] is used for description and analysis of qubits, geometric phase parameters – things critical in the area of topological quantum computing [3], [4]. The used tool, Geometric (Clifford) Algebra [5], [6], is the most convenient formalism for that case. Generalizations of formal " complex plane " to an arbitrary variable plane in 3D, and of usual Hopf fibration to the map generated by an arbitrary unit value element 0 g   3 G are resulting in more profound description of qubits compared to quantum mechanical Hilbert space formalism.
1
Geometric algebra, qubits, geometric evolution, and all that
Alexander M. SOIGUINE
Copyright © 2015
Abstract: The approach initialized in [1], [2] is used for description and analysis of qubits, geometric phase parameters things
critical in the area of topological quantum computing [3], [4]. The used tool, Geometric (Clifford) Algebra [5], [6], is the most
convenient formalism for that case. Generalizations of formal “complex plane” to an arbitrary variable plane in 3D, and of usual
Hopf fibration to the map generated by an arbitrary unit value element
0
g
3
G
are resulting in more profound description
of qubits compared to quantum mechanical Hilbert space formalism.
1. Introduction
The working environment will be even subalgebra
3
G
of elements
S
I
1
,
and
are (real
2
)
scalars,
is a unit size oriented area, bivector, in an arbitrary given plane
3
ES
. It was explained in
[7], [8] that elements
S
I
only differ from what is traditionally called “complex numbers” by the
fact that
3
ES
is an arbitrary plane. Traditional “imaginary unit”
i
is geometrically some
S
I
when it is
not necessary to specify the containing plane everything is going on in one fixed plane, not in 3D
world.
2. Rotations with elements of
3
G
and generalized Hopf fibration
Let’s take a unit value element of
3
G
:
 
Sso ,,
 
ii beeeeeeeebeebeeb
,
213132321213132321
,
1
22
and
1
2
3
2
2
2
1bbb
. If
C
is a bivector,
213132321 eeCeeCeeCC
, then the map
 
rot
CSCsoSso ,,,, ~
,
 
S
ISso
~
,,
, is rotation of
C
. This rotation generates a
map
 
rot
CCSsoSS ,,:
23
. If, for example,
32eeC
then:
)()( 32
SS IeeI
 
32213132321 eeeebeebeeb
 
213132321 eebeebeeb
)()( 21313232132213132321 eeeeeeeeeeeeee
32
2
3
2
2
2
1
2)( ee
13213 )(2 ee

21231 )(2 ee

, (2.1)
which is classical Hopf fibration
23 SS
.
1
This sum bears the sense “something and something”. It is not a sum of similar elements giving another element
of the same kind, see [1], [9].
2
Scalars should always be real. “Complex” scalars are not scalars.
2
Also (2.1) shows that “imaginary” number
i
in this Hopf fibration written in traditional terms should
geometrically be unit value oriented area
32ee
orthogonal to the basis vector
1
e
.
Suppose bivector is expanded not in
 
211332 ,, eeeeee
but in any basis of bivectors
 
321 ,, BBB
, where
is arbitrary unit bivector in 3D, and
2
B
,
3
B
are two unit bivectors orthogonal to
1
B
and to each
other. Their mutual orientation should satisfy the same multiplication rules as
 
211332 ,, eeeeee
do:
132231321 ,, BBBBBBBBB
. The Hopf fibration then can be extended to an arbitrary
generating element from
3
G
:
 
3322110
,, BCBCBCC
Sso
0
C
 
 
 
 
131233212
2
3
2
2
2
1
2
122 BCCC

 
 
 
 
 
21323
2
3
2
1
2
2
2
22131 22 BCCC

 
 
 
 
3
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
332122311 22 BCCC

(2.2)
3. Quantum mechanical qubits and elements of
3
G
A pure qubit state in terms of conventional quantum mechanics is two dimensional unit value vector
with “complex” value components:
2,1,,1
~~
,
1
0
0
121
2211
2
2
2
121
2
1
kizzzzzzzzzzz
z
zkkk
Let’s find explicit relations between elements
as two-component “complex” vectors and elements
 
Sso ,,
belonging to
3
G
. Take an arbitrary
),,( Sso
. If bivector
32ee
is chosen as the one
defining “complex plane”
S
, we have:
21322332121321322321 )()()(),,( eeeeeeeeeeeeeeSso
21
3,2
2
3,2
1eezz
So we get correspondence:
 
32
23
1
3,2
2
3,2
1,,, eei
i
i
z
z
Sso
Actually, the number of such maps is infinite because “complex” plane can be an arbitrary plane in 3D.
Take arbitrary mutually orthogonal unit bivectors
 
321 ,, BBB
satisfying multiplication rules as above. If
 
S
ISsoS,,
3
is expanded in basis
 
321 ,, BBB
:
3
 
iiS bBBBBbBbBbI
,
332211332211
,
then, for example, taking
1
B
as “complex” plane we get:
 
3123113331211332211 BBBBBBBBBB
,
and the correspondence is:
 
1
23
1
2
1,,, 1
1Bi
i
i
z
z
Sso B
B
- arbitrary bivector in 3D (3.1)
So, for any
 
Sso ,,
we have the following mappings:
231233
123122
312311
332211332211
)(
)(
)(
)(),,(
BBB
BBB
BBB
BBBBbBbBbSso
forgottenBBi
i
i
forgottenBBi
i
i
forgottenBBi
i
i
23
12
3
12
31
2
31
23
1
;,
;,
;,
(3.2)
All that means that to recover, or establish, which
 
Sso ,,
in 3D is associated with
2
1
z
z
it is
necessary, firstly, to define which plane in 3D should be taken as “complex” plane and then to choose
another plane, orthogonal to the first one. The third orthogonal plane is then defined by the first two up
to orientation that formally means
1
321 BBB
.
4. New definitions
I shall give new definitions of states, observables, measurements and observable values in the case of
3D objects identifiable as
3
G
elements:
Definition 4.1.
States of a qubit and observables of a qubit are unit value elements of
3
G
. The notations will
be used in the following mainly as:
4
State -
 
S
ISso ,,
 
ii bBBBBbBbBb
,
332211332211
,
1
22
,
1
2
3
2
2
2
1bbb
Observable -
1, 2
3
2
2
2
1
2
03322110 CCCCBCBCBCCC
Definition 4.2.
Measurement of observable
C
, measured in state
S
I
, is a generalized Hopf fibration
generated by
C
:
 
SS
C
S
GICIIGG :
33 3
,
which is a new element from
3
G
explicitly given in basis components by (2.2).
Definition 4.3.
Value of observable
C
, measured in state
S
I
, is a map of the measurement of the
observable to a set of measurement values.
5. Qubit states in
3
G
corresponding to quantum mechanical basis states
Quantum mechanical pure qubit state is
10 21 zz
, linear combination of two basis states
0
and
1
. In
3
G
terms these two states are, as follows from (3.1), the classes of equivalence:
- State
0
corresponds to any one of the following sets of
 
0
,, Sso
elements:
1
i
,
1
2
1
2
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
1
Bi
, or:
2
i
,
1
2
2
2
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
2
Bi
, or: (5.1)
3
i
,
1
2
3
2
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
3
Bi
.
- State
corresponds to any one the following sets of
 
1
,, Sso
elements:
323 )( Bi
,
1
2
2
2
3
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
1
Bi
, or:
131 )( Bi
,
1
2
3
2
1
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
2
Bi
, or: (5.2)
212 )( Bi
,
1
2
1
2
2
, if the “complex plane” is selected as
3
Bi
.
For any of the states
3,2,1, iBii
, corresponding to
0
, the value of observable
i
B
is:
iiiiiiii BBBBB )()()( 22
(5.3)
5
For any of the states
3,2,1,
3mod)1(3mod)1(3mod)2(3mod)2( iBB iiii
, corresponding to
1
(with the
agreement 3mod3=3, since index 0 does not here exist), the value of observable
i
B
is:
iiii
iiiiiiiii
BB
BBBBB
)(
)()(
23mod)1(
23mod)2(
3mod)1(3mod)1(3mod)2(3mod)2(3mod)1(3mod)1(3mod)2(3mod)2(
(5.4)
This is the actual meaning of quantum mechanical basis states:
Value of observable
i
B
is, for any pure qubit state from the set of all
 
0
,, Sso
, the bivector
i
B
itself:
 
i
BBSso i
0
,,
Value of observable
i
B
is, for any pure qubit state from the set of all
 
1
,, Sso
, flipped bivector
i
B
:
 
i
BBSso i
1
,,
Lets’ take arbitrary bivector observable
332211 BCBCBCC
. Without losing of generality we can
think that “complex” plane is defined by bivector
. Then generalized Hopf fibrations, measurements
of the observable
C
, for the states
 
0
,, Sso
and
 
1
,, Sso
, are correspondingly:
 
 
 
 
 
312
2
1
2
3213
2
1
2
2111111 22 BCCBCCBCBCB

 
33223211 2cos2sin2sin2cos BCCBCCBC
(through parameterization
cos
,
sin
1
)
and:
 
 
 
 
 
3
2
3
2
233222323
2
3
2
221133223322 22 BCCBCCBCBBCBB
33223211 )2cos2sin()2sin2cos( BCCBCCBC
(through parameterization
cos
2
,
sin
3
).
We get the following:
Measurement of observable
332211 BCBCBCC
in pure qubit state
 
0
,, Sso
, is bivector
with the
component equal to unchanged value
. The
2
B
and
3
B
measurement components are
equal to
2
B
and
3
B
components of
C
rotated by angle
2
defined by
cos
and
sin
1
,
where plane of rotation is
.
6
Measurement of observable
332211 BCBCBCC
in pure qubit state
 
1
,, Sso
, is bivector
with the
component equal to flipped value
1
C
(qubit flips in
plane). The
2
B
and
3
B
measurement components are equal to
2
B
and
3
B
components of
C
rotated by angle
2
defined
by
cos
2
,
sin
3
, where plane of rotation is
1
B
. The absolute value of angle of rotation is
the same as for
 
0
,, Sso
but the rotation direction is opposite to the case of
 
0
,, Sso
.
The above results are geometrically pretty clear. The two states,
 
0
,, Sso
and
 
1
,, Sso
represented in
3
G
correspondingly by
11
B
and
3213 )( BB
, only differ by additional factor
3
B
in
 
1
,, Sso
. That means that measurements of bivector observable
C
in states
 
0
,, Sso
and
 
1
,, Sso
are equivalent up to additional “wrapper”
3
B
:
       
3
0
~
0
3
1
~
1,,,,
~
,,,, BSCsoSsoBSCsoSso
(5.5)
That simply means that the measurement on the left side is received from the
 
0
~
0,,,, SCsoSso
measurement just by flipping of the latter relative to the plane
3
B
.
6. Berry parameters for the
3
G
qubit states
Quantum mechanical transformations
i
e
, considered as transformations on
3
S
, are often
called Clifford translations. Clifford translation of state
),,( Sso
with explicitly defined “complex”
plane
Cl
should be written as
),,(),,( SsoeSso Cl
I
.
Let’s take transformation:
 
),,,(),,(),,(),,( tSsoSsoeSsoeSso tH
H
H
Ht
(6.1)
where
is constant value generic Hamiltonian of the system, bivector of
3
G
with the plane not
coinciding with
S
. Clearly,
),,,( tSso
satisfies Schrödinger equation:
 
),,,(),,,( tSsoH
H
H
tSso
dt
d
with unit bivector
H
H
in 3D replacing “imaginary unit”
i
of the conventional quantum mechanics case.
This is important thing: in terms of
3
G
the Schrödinger equation is equation for the result of
7
transformation of a
3
G
qubit state
),,(),,( SsoeSso Ht
generated by
3
G
bivector
Hamiltonian which is generic Hamiltonian of the system.
Let’s consider the Hamiltonian corresponding to constant value
H
magnetic field slowly rotating
around axis orthogonal, for example, to plane
(axis along vector
3
e
). Initial plane of the field
is
inclined by some angle
relative to vector
3
e
. It may be initialized as rotation of
in plane
:
2
3
2
3
11
BB eBHeBH
The inclined field rotates around
3
e
depending on angle
)(t
:
2)(
2
3
22 )( 3113
)( t
BBB
t
BeeBeeHtH
(6.2)
Calculate (6.2) in two steps. First, incline
3
B
:
2
3
2
3
11
BB eBHeBH
that gives
 
cossin 32 BBH
. Then rotate the inclined bivector:
2)(
2
3
22 )( 3113
)( t
BBB
t
BeeBeeHtH
 
2)(
32
2)( 33 cossin t
B
t
BeBBeH
 
cos)(cossin)(sinsin 321 BtBtBH
(6.3)
Let’s now calculate Berry curvature and connection in full
3
G
terms. Forgetting about
H
and using
notation
U
for
 
cos)(cossin)(sinsin 321 BtBtBH
we have:
cossincoscossinsinsin
~32321 3BBeBBBU B
,
3
 
sincos 32
3BBe
UB
, then
3
23
~B
GeB
U
BUA
From another derivative:
sin
3
1B
eB
U
,
cossinsin
~3
1
2
3B
GeB
U
BUA
3
I am also using easily verified
33 22 BB eBBe
8
We see that full
3
G
values
G
A
and
G
A
differ from usual quantum mechanical case by additional
bivector terms. The Berry curvature also has additional bivector term:
 

2cos12sin 3
1B
GGG eBAAF
The additional bivector terms may be an indicator of a kind of torsion caused by (6.2)
g
-qubit
transformation, though it needs further elaboration.
7. Geometric evolution.
With explicitly defined variable “imaginary unit” many things become not just more informative but also
much simpler. As an example take the
3
G
variant of geometric evolution derived in usual quantum
mechanical approach through holonomy (see, for example, [4]).
Transformation (6.1) can be straightforwardly generalized to:
 
),,,(),,(),,( )(
)( )(
tSsoSsoeSso tH
tH tH
The “complex” plane defined by unit bivector
)( )(tH tH
then becomes variable and
)(tH
plays the role of
angle in this plane. The evolution equation for the result of transformation is:
   
tSsotHtH
tH tH
tSso
dt
d,,,)()(
)( )(
,,,
,
which is a generalization of Schrödinger equation with variable “imaginary unit”
)( )(
)( tH tH
ti
.
Let‘s make assumption that
)(tU
in
)()(
~
)( 0tUHtUtH
just generates rotation, so
0
)( HtH
. If
the initial value of Hamiltonian also lies on
3
S
we have:
   
tSsotHtHtSso
dt
d,,,)()(,,,
 
 
tSsotH
dt
d,,,)(
2
12
with the solution:
 
0,,,,,, )(
2
1
2
122
0SsoeetSso tHH
9
8. Conclusions.
The idea of using variable plane in 3D for playing the role of “complex plane”, in combination with
3
G
algebra, resulted in more detailed description of quantum states and observables usually formalized in
terms of two-dimensional “complex” vectors and Hermitian matrices. New additional components in
Berry parameters may be used to analyze possible anyonic states in the topological computing related
structures.
Works Cited
[1]
A. Soiguine, "A tossed coin as quantum mechanical object," September 2013. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1309.5002.
[2]
A. Soiguine, "What quantum "state" really is?," June 2014. [Online]. Available:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3751.
[3]
C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman and S. Das Sarma, "Non-Abelian Anyons and
Topological Quantum Computation," Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 80, p. 1083, 2008.
[4]
J. K. Pachos, Introduction to Topological Quantum Computation, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press, 2012.
[5]
D. Hestenes, New Foundations of Classical Mechanics, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic
Publishers, 1999.
[6]
C. Doran and A. Lasenby, Geometric Algebra for Physicists, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
2010.
[7]
A. Soiguine, "Complex Conjugation - Realtive to What?," in Clifford Algebras with Numeric and
Symbolic Computations, Boston, Birkhauser, 1996, pp. 285-294.
[8]
A. Soiguine, Vector Algebra in Applied Problems, Leningrad: Naval Academy, 1990 (in Russian).
[9]
J. W. Arthur, Understanding Geometric Algebra for Electromagnetic Theory, John Wiley & Sons,
2011.
... Mathematical formalism was also taken from available mathematics at hand: mostly the Hilbert spaces [2]. Unambiguous definition of states and observables, does not matter are we in "classical" or "quantum" frame, should follow the general paradigm, [3], [4], [5], [6]: ...
... A theory that is an alternative to conventional quantum mechanics has been under development for a while, see, [3], [4], [7], [6], [8]. ...
... In the current formalism scalars can only be real numbers. "Complex" scalars make no sense anymore, see, for example,[4],[8]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory replacing conventional quantum theory (Mathematics Subject Classification, item 81). Generalizations, stemming from changing of complex numbers by geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions, followed by unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements, bring into reality clear explanations of weird quantum mechanical features, for example, primitively considering atoms as a kind of planetary system, very familiar from macroscopic experience but recklessly used in a physically very different situation. In the current work the three-sphere becomes the playground of the torsion kind states eliminating abstract Hilbert space vectors. The states as 3  points evolve, governed by updated Schrodinger equation, and act as operators on observables in measurements. ALEXANDER SOIGUINE 30
... Unambiguous definition of states and observables, does not matter are we in "classical" or "quantum" frame, should follow the general paradigm, [3], [4], [5], [6]: ...
... A theory that is an alternative to conventional quantum mechanics has been under development for a while, see, [3], [4], [7], [6], [8]. ...
... In the current formalism scalars can only be real numbers. "Complex" scalars make no sense anymore, see, for example,[4],[8]. ...
... Unambiguous definition of states and observables, does not matter are we in "classical" or "quantum" frame, should follow general paradigm, [1], [2], [3]: ...
... A theory that is an alternative to conventional quantum mechanics has been under development for a while, see, [1], [2], [4], [5]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory replacing conventional quantum mechanics. Generalizations, stemming from implementation of complex numbers as geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions, followed by unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements, bring into reality clear explanations of some weird quantum mechanical features, particularly, the results of double-slit experiments where particles create diffraction patterns inherent to a wave, or modeling atoms as a kind of solar system. Abstract-The Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory replacing conventional quantum mechanics. Generalizations, stemming from implementation of complex numbers as geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions, followed by unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements, bring into reality clear explanations of some weird quantum mechanical features, particularly, the results of double-slit experiments where particles create diffraction patterns inherent to a wave, or modeling atoms as a kind of solar system.
... The 3 elements of the form 3 = + , where is some unit bivector arbitrary placed in three-dimensional space, comprise so called even subalgebra of algebra 3 . This subalgebra is denoted by 3 + (Soiguine, 2015(Soiguine, , 2020. Elements of 3 + can be depict as in Figure 1. ...
Article
Full-text available
The Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory upgrading conventional quantum mechanics. Generalizations, stemming from implementation of complex numbers as geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions; unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements bring into reality clear explanations of conventional weird quantum mechanical features, particularly the results of double split experiments where particles create diffraction patterns inherent to wave diffraction. This weirdness of the double split experiment is milestone of all further difficulties in interpretation of quantum mechanics.
... Unambiguous definition of states and observables, does not matter are we in "classical" or "quantum" frame, should follow the general paradigm [1], [2], [3]: ...
Article
Full-text available
The article contains an application of a theory aiming to change the underlying mathematical structure of conventional quantum mechanics which is a no-work-around obstacle to create quantum computers. The theory modifications, along with geometrically feasible generalization of formal imaginary unit to unit value areas of explicitly defined planes in three dimensions, include implementation of idea that commonly used notions "state", "observable", "measurement" require a clear unambiguous redefinition. New definition helps to establish effective formalism which in combination with geometric algebra generalizations brings into reality a kind of physical fields, which are states in terms of the suggested theory, spreading through the whole three-dimensional space and full range of scalar values of the time parameter. The fields can be modified instantly in all points of space and past and future time values, thus eliminating the concepts of cause and effect, and one-directional time.
... Unambiguous definition of states and observables, does not matter are we in "classical" or "quantum" frame, should follow the general paradigm [3], [4], [5]: ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The article contains outline of a theory aiming to change the underlying mathematical structure of conventional quantum mechanics which is a no-work-around obstacle to create quantum computers. Part of that is that commonly used notions "state", "observable", "measurement" require a clear unambiguous redefinition. New definition helps to establish effective formalism which in combination with geometric algebra generalizations brings into reality a kind of physical fields, which are states in terms of the suggested theory, spreading through the whole three-dimensional space and full range of scalar values of the time parameter. The fields can be modified instantly in all points of space and past and future time values, thus eliminating the concepts of cause, effect and one-directional time.
... Linear space í µí°º 3 can be supplied with norm: ‖í µí±€ 3 ‖ 2 = (í µí±€ 3 í µí±€ 3 ) í µí±† = í µí»¼ 2 + |í µí±Ž| 2 + |í µí±| 2 + í µí»½ 2 The elements of í µí°º 3 satisfying í µí±€ 3 = í µí±€ ̃ 3 , that's of the form í µí±€ 3 = í µí»¼ + í µí°¼ í µí±† í µí»½, where S I is some unit bivector arbitrary placed in three dimensional space, bear the name of even elements of algebra í µí°º 3 . The even elements make their own subalgebra because operations of algebraic addition and multiplication of even elements return even elements. ...
Preprint
Full-text available
The Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory deeper than conventional quantum mechanics. Generalizations, stemming from implementation of complex numbers as geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions, unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements, Maxwell equations solution in that terms, bring into reality a kind of physical fields, states in the suggested theory, spreading through the whole three-dimensional space and values of the time parameter. The fields can be modified instantly in all points of space and time values, thus eliminating the concept of cause and effect and perceiving of one-directional time.
Article
Full-text available
The Geometric Algebra formalism opens the door to developing a theory replacing conventional quantum mechanics. Generalizations, stemming from changing of complex numbers by geometrically feasible objects in three dimensions , followed by unambiguous definition of states, observables, measurements , bring into reality clear explanations of weird quantum mechanical features, for example primitively considering atoms as a kind of solar system. The three-sphere 3  becomes the playground of the torsion kind states eliminating abstract Hilbert space vectors. The 3  points evolve, governed by updated Schrodinger equation, and act in measurements on observable as operators .
Article
Full-text available
To get out of logical deadlock in interpreting gedanken experiments like "Schrodinger cat", actual meaning of a "wave function", or a "state", in the case of complex two-dimensional Hilbert space, is shown to be an element of even subalgebra of geometric algebra [1], [2] over three-dimensional Euclidian space. Exodus 23:2 1
Article
Full-text available
To get out of logical deadlock in interpreting gedanken experiments like Schrodinger cat, actual meaning of a wave function, or a state, in the case of complex two-dimensional Hilbert space, is shown to represent transformations executing by elements of even subalgebra of geometric algebra over three-dimensional Euclidian space.
Article
Full-text available
Combining physics, mathematics and computer science, topological quantum computation is a rapidly expanding research area focused on the exploration of quantum evolutions that are immune to errors. In this book, the author presents a variety of different topics developed together for the first time, forming an excellent introduction to topological quantum computation. The makings of anyonic systems, their properties and their computational power are presented in a pedagogical way. Relevant calculations are fully explained, and numerous worked examples and exercises support and aid understanding. Special emphasis is given to the motivation and physical intuition behind every mathematical concept. Demystifying difficult topics by using accessible language, this book has broad appeal and is ideal for graduate students and researchers from various disciplines who want to get into this new and exciting research field.
Article
Full-text available
Comprehensive and physically consistent model of a tossed coin is presented in terms of geometric algebra. The model clearly shows that there is nothing elementary particle specific in the half-spin quantum mechanical formalism. It also demonstrates what really is behind this formalism, feasibly reveals the probabilistic meaning of wave function and shows that arithmetic of packed objects, namely wave functions and Pauli matrices, reduces the amount of available information.
Chapter
Full-text available
Some initial, technically simple but fundamentally important statements concerning the very notion of a complex number are formulated in terms of Clifford (Geometric) algebra generated by vectors in some geometrically and physically sensitive dimensions. It is shown that it makes no sense to speak about complex numbers without identifying a corresponding two-dimensional plane.
Article
Full-text available
Topological quantum computation has recently emerged as one of the most exciting approaches to constructing a fault-tolerant quantum computer. The proposal relies on the existence of topological states of matter whose quasiparticle excitations are neither bosons nor fermions, but are particles known as {\it Non-Abelian anyons}, meaning that they obey {\it non-Abelian braiding statistics}. Quantum information is stored in states with multiple quasiparticles, which have a topological degeneracy. The unitary gate operations which are necessary for quantum computation are carried out by braiding quasiparticles, and then measuring the multi-quasiparticle states. The fault-tolerance of a topological quantum computer arises from the non-local encoding of the states of the quasiparticles, which makes them immune to errors caused by local perturbations. To date, the only such topological states thought to have been found in nature are fractional quantum Hall states, most prominently the \nu=5/2 state, although several other prospective candidates have been proposed in systems as disparate as ultra-cold atoms in optical lattices and thin film superconductors. In this review article, we describe current research in this field, focusing on the general theoretical concepts of non-Abelian statistics as it relates to topological quantum computation, on understanding non-Abelian quantum Hall states, on proposed experiments to detect non-Abelian anyons, and on proposed architectures for a topological quantum computer. We address both the mathematical underpinnings of topological quantum computation and the physics of the subject using the \nu=5/2 fractional quantum Hall state as the archetype of a non-Abelian topological state enabling fault-tolerant quantum computation. Comment: Final Accepted form for RMP
Article
This book aims to disseminate geometric algebra as a straightforward mathematical tool set for working with and understanding classical electromagnetic theory. It's target readership is anyone who has some knowledge of electromagnetic theory, predominantly ordinary scientists and engineers who use it in the course of their work, or postgraduate students and senior undergraduates who are seeking to broaden their knowledge and increase their understanding of the subject. It is assumed that the reader is not a mathematical specialist and is neither familiar with geometric algebra or its application to electromagnetic theory. The modern approach, geometric algebra, is the mathematical tool set we should all have started out with and once the reader has a grasp of the subject, he or she cannot fail to realize that traditional vector analysis is really awkward and even misleading by comparison. Professors can request a solutions manual by email: [email protected] /* */ © 2011 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
Article
Geometric algebra is a powerful mathematical language with applications across a range of subjects in physics and engineering. This book is a complete guide to the current state of the subject with early chapters providing a self-contained introduction to geometric algebra. Topics covered include new techniques for handling rotations in arbitrary dimensions, and the links between rotations, bivectors and the structure of the Lie groups. Following chapters extend the concept of a complex analytic function theory to arbitrary dimensions, with applications in quantum theory and electromagnetism. Later chapters cover advanced topics such as non-Euclidean geometry, quantum entanglement, and gauge theories. Applications such as black holes and cosmic strings are also explored. It can be used as a graduate text for courses on the physical applications of geometric algebra and is also suitable for researchers working in the fields of relativity and quantum theory.