ArticlePDF Available

The Importance and Benefits of Teacher Collegiality in Schools – A Literature Review

Authors:

Abstract

Strong and healthy collegial relationship among school teachers is regarded as an essential component of school effectiveness and teacher enhancement. Based on literature review, the present article highlights the importance of collegiality among educators and determines the major outcomes and benefits of highly collaborative and collegial cultures in educational organizations. The study suggests that teacher collegiality plays a vital role in augmenting teacher professional growth and development, job satisfaction, organizational and professional commitment as well as school quality and student performance. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Huseyin Uzunboylu
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 1242 – 1246
1877-0428 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu
doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.282
WCES 2012
The importance and benefits of teacher collegiality in schools a
literature review
Madiha Shah
*
University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Abstract
Strong and healthy collegial relationship among school teachers is regarded as an essential component of school effectiveness
and teacher enhancement. Based on literature review, the present article highlights the importance of collegiality among
educators and determines the major outcomes and benefits of highly collaborative and collegial cultures in educational
organizations. The study suggests that teacher collegiality plays a vital role in augmenting teacher professional growth and
development, job satisfaction, organizational and professional commitment as well as school quality and student performance.
2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords: School improvement; Organizational effectiveness; Professional development; Instructional improvement; Student achievement.
1. Introduction
Research has consistently underlined the contribution of strong collegial relationships to school improvement and
success [1] [2] [3] [4] and argued that high levels of collegiality among staff members is one of the characteristics
found most often among successful schools. Teachers are increasingly being admonished to move away from the
traditional norms of isolation and autonomy and to move towards greater collegiality and collaboration [5].
Traditionally, schools have been isolating places where collegial cooperation among educators is not a common
practice [
for them to make the time to talk or work together. Teachers need opportunities to collegiate with each other to best
serve their students, to make their work more meaningful, and to transform schooling in a way that keeps it vibrant
and relevant [8].
The conception is that educators perform better when working together professionally is supported by
organizational theory models which emerged earlier in the corporate sector [9] [10]. Such conceptions view
authentic teamwork as an essential characteristic of the successful organization as its members interact regularly to
share their ideas and expertise and develop common understanding of organizational goals and the means to their
attainment [11].
Numerous benefits from teacher collegiality have been reported as evidence of the need for building a more
effective collegial culture in schools. The most significant benefits of collegiality among teaching staff is an
improvement in teacher professional growth and development [3] [4], teacher professionalism [12] [13], school
quality and organizational effectiveness [1] [14], and student behaviour, attitude, and achievement [2] [15] [16].
*
Madiha Shah. Tel.: +60-17-6684-735
E-mail address: madihashah.phd@gmail.com
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
© 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Uzunboylu
Open access under
CC BY-NC-ND license.
Open access under
CC BY-NC-ND license.
1243
Madiha Shah / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 1242 – 1246
2. Benefits for Teachers
Collegiality is seen as a key aspect of teacher professional development and a vehicle to increase teacher
knowledge. The qualities and characteristics that fall under the labels of teacher individualism, isolation, and
privatism are widely perceived as threats or barriers to teacher professional growth and development. Schools in
recent years are believed to be the best places for teachers to learn and grow professionally and schools are
beginning to restructure in ways that provide more opportunities for teachers to learn together [17]. Collegial
communities create such a cooperative climate that heightens the level of innovation and enthusiasm among teachers
and provides a continuous support for staff professional enhancement [18]. Many educators and researchers have
advocated the methods of teacher growth and enhancement that are based on continuous collegial interaction and
support [19] [20]. It is suggested that teacher collegiality could modify instruction [21]; therefore, teachers need to
recognize the value of working together and to focus on what they have in common. Under the norms of privatism
much good teaching goes on unacknowledged while teachers who work in collegial settings become more open to
new ideas, teaching methods, and resources.
It is suggested that collegiality among staff leads to increased teacher satisfaction and adaptability [22]. It breaks
the isolation of the classroom and brings career rewards and daily satisfactions for teachers. Collegiality stimulates
enthusiasm among teachers and reduces emotional stress and burnout [23] [24]. It also creates a sense of belonging
among organizational members and makes the bonds more cohesive. Collegial cultures make teachers more
committed to their organization [25] [26] and to their profession [12] [13]. It is reported that collaborating teachers
perceived themselves as more committed to their goals and to their students [27]. It is also found that collegiality
influences the motivation and career commitment of teachers and the extent to which they are willing to modify
classroom practice [28].
Collegiality provides more systemic assistance to beginning teachers [29]. It avoids the sink-or-swim, trial-and-
error mode that novice teachers usually face during the initial stages of their career. Collegiality brings experienced
and beginning teachers closer together to reinforce the competence and confidence of the beginners [29] [30].
Schools having a good collaborative culture and strong atmosphere of collegiality have lower attrition rates as
compared to other schools [23] [31].
Collegiality helps teachers to cope with uncertainty and complexity, respond effectively to rapid change and
create a climate that values risk taking and continuous improvement [32]. It is stated that teachers who work
together become more flexible in times of change and cope better with new demands that would normally exhaust
the energy and resources of teachers working on their own [33]. The key to promoting change in schools is through
establishing collaborative cultures based on the principles of collegiality, openness, and trust [34].
-efficacy by many researchers
[20] [35]. Norms of individualism and non-interference have b
efficacy of their own practice which eventually limits the possibility of improving student learning [36]. Collegiality
is considered as the most important energy giver and it is claimed that when teachers have strong emotional
connections with colleagues their teaching energy is high [37].
Hargreaves listed eleven benefits of collaboration among school staff: moral support; increased efficiency;
improved effectiveness; reduced overload; synchronized time perspectives between teachers and administrators (i.e.,
shared and realistic expectations about timeframes for change and implementation); situated certainty of collective
professional wisdom; political assertiveness; increased capacity for reflection; organizational responsiveness;
opportunities to learn; and continuous learning [38].
facilitated consensus building and decisions to adopt or abandon innovations [39]. Teachers benefit greatly from the
collective generation of ideas and suggestions, enhanced communication, willingness to seek and give help,
improved practice, and enhanced repertoires of techniques [39]. Other miscellaneous studies that have reported
positive outcomes of collegiality for teachers include more positive attitudes toward teaching [40], open
communication among colleagues [41], high morale [42], and increments in the levels of trust [43].
1244 Madiha Shah / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 1242 – 1246
3. Benefits for Students
Re
achievement suggests that schools with higher levels of teacher collegiality had higher achievement scores [2] [44]
[45]. This perhaps is the most fundamental reason for pursuing collegiality among school staff members.
It is believed that higher collegial relations among teaching staff lead to higher quality instruction and, in turn,
increased student academic achievement [46]. It is assumed that nurturing a collegial culture in a school would
benefit student learning more than using structural change to improve student learning [47]. The schools where
teachers take collective responsibility for student achievement, students show greater gains in core subjects [16]. In
a comparative study of two high-performing and two low-performing schools in Michigan, it was found that
teachers in the high-performing schools reported more occurrences of collaboration than teachers in low-performing
schools [48]. It was therefore, concluded that school culture needs to change to be less isolating and more
collaborative.
A study that specifically focused on teacher collaboration as one of the best practices in elementary schools in
Tennessee found that all the high-performing schools had some kind of mandated time for horizontal collaboration
in place, although the frequency of these collaborative activities varied from daily common planning time to
required meetings once every two weeks [49]. Another study indicated that fourth-grade students have higher
achievement in mathematics and reading when they attended schools characterized by higher levels of teacher
collaboration [2].
4. Benefits for Educational Organizations
Collegiality is one of the most important factors in determining the quality of a school. It is assumed that the task
of developing collegiality may be integral to the task of improving schools [50]. Collaboration appears to be the
unifying theme that characterized many of the new developments in the successful schools of the 1990s. Even the
recent literature on school improvement has also shown that the most promising strategy for sustained, substantive
school improvement is developing the ability among school personnel to function as professional collegial
communities [1] [14].
A workplace study of 78 schools in 8 districts in Tennessee affirmed the importance of the social context as the
researcher concluded that professional communities in schools support adoption because educators in these social
environments naturally look for improvement strategies [51]. Another study conducted in less advantaged public
schools in Chicago found that schools with strong professional learning communities improved four times faster
than schools without these communities [52].
5. Conclusion
Teacher collegiality is necessary in an era of continuous change and improvement. It is seen as an opportunity to
involve many individuals in solving the complex educational problems of modern times. A wider range of demands
can be addressed by using a collaborative approach than by individual, isolated efforts [53]. Schools that do not
support collegiality among their staff and allow their teachers to work alone in their classrooms waste human
resources and contribute to disenchantment with teaching as a career [54]. It is warned that collegiality in any
organization does not happen by chance; it needs to be structured, taught, and learned [16]. It is pointed out that
laying the groundwork for a collaborative and collegial culture
collection of superstar teachers working in isolation cannot produce the same results as interdependent colleagues
The process of collegiality is likely to work only when a significant number of teaching personnel at a specific
school becomes convinced that it will actually lead to improved teaching and learning. The overall analysis of the
research studies on teacher collegiality determines that effective collegiality in schools is a vital source of
enhancement in staff professional growth, student learning, and organizational effectiveness.
1245
Madiha Shah / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 1242 – 1246
References
[1] Barth, R. S. (2006). Improving relationships within the schoolhouse. Educational Leadership, 63 (6), 8 13.
[2] Goddard, Y. L., Goddard, R. D., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). A theoretical and empirical investigation of teacher collaboration for school
improvement and student achievement in public elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 109 (4), 877
896.
[3] Jarzabkowski, L. M. (2003). Teacher collegiality in a remote Australian school. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18 (3), 139
144.
[4] Retallick, J., & Butt, R. (2004). Professional well-being and learning: A study of teacher-peer workplace relationships. Journal of Educational
Enquiry, 5 (1), 85
99.
[5] Marks, H. M., & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for
instructional practice and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19 (3), 245
275.
[6] Bruffee, K. A. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge (2nd ed.). Baltimore,
MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
[7] Heider, K. L. (2005). Teacher isolation: How mentoring programs can help. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 8 (14). Available at
http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume8/number14/
[8] Dillon, P. W. (2003). Policies to enable teacher collaboration. Available at http://www.teachersnetwork.org/tnpi/research/growth/dillon.html
[9] Covey, S. R. (1991). Principle-centered Leadership. New York, NY: Summit Books.
[10] Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline. New York, NY: Doubleday.
[11] Leonard, L., & Leonard, P. (2003). The continuing trouble with collaboration: Teachers talk. Current Issues in Education [On-line], 6 (15).
Available at http://cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number15/
[12] Futernick, K. (2007). A possible dream: Retaining California teachers so all students can learn {Electronic Resource} Report. California
State University. Available at www.calstate.edu/teacherquality/documents/possible_dream_exec.pdf
[13] Hausman, C. S., & Goldring, E. B. (2001). Sustaining teacher commitment: The role of professional communities. Peabody Journal of
Education, 76 (2), 30
51.
[14] DuFour,
Educational Leadership, 61 (8), 6 11.
pproach to school improvement. Journal of Research in Rural
Education, 24 (5), 1
12.
[16] Garmston, R. J., & Wellman, B. M. (2003). The importance of professional community. ENC Focus, 11 (7), 7
9.
[17] Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan,
76 (8), 597
604.
Work: Individuals, Colleagues and Contexts (pp. 79 103). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
[19] Owen, S. (2005). The power of collegiality in school-based professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (1), 1
14.
[20] Shachar, H., & Shmuelevitz, H. (
heterogeneous junior high schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22 (1), 53 72.
[21] Martin, P. C. (2008). Collaborative practices among teachers to serve low-achieving high school ESL students. Doctoral dissertation.
Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (AAT 3297009).
[22] Inger, M. (1993). Teacher collaboration in urban secondary schools (ERIC/CUE Digest No. 93). New York, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on
Urban Education. Available at http://vocserve.berkeley.edu/CenterFocus/CF2.html
[23] Abdallah, J. (2009). Lowering teacher attrition rates through collegiality. Academic Leadership the online Journal, 7 (1). Available at
http://www.academicleadership.org/emprical_research/531.shtml
bility, and strength. In R. Vandenberghe, & A. M. Huberman (eds.),
Understanding and Preventing Teacher Burnout: A Sourcebook of International Research and Practice (pp. 223
237). Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
[25] Mutchler, S. E. (2005). Teacher commitment in an academically improving, high-poverty public school. Doctoral dissertation, The
University of Texas, Austin.
[26] Troncoso-Skidmore, S. (2007). Professionally committed teachers. PRISE White Paper No. 2007
9.
[27] Walsh, K., & Shay, M. (1993). In support of interdisciplinary learning: The climate factor. Middle School Journal, 24 (4), 56
60.
[28] McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2001). Professional Communities and the Work of High School Teaching. Chicago, IL: University of
Chicago Press.
Teachers College Record, 91
(4), 509
536.
[30] Nias, J. (1998). Why teachers need their colleagues: A developmental perspective. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D.
Hopkins (eds.), International Handbook of Educational Change (pp. 1257
1271). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
[31] Guarino, C., Santibanez, L., Daley, G., & Brewer, D. (2004). A review of the research literature on teacher recruitment and retention (Tech.
No. TR-164-EDU). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Available at http://rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/2005/RAND_TR164.sum.pdf
[32] Hargreaves, A. (1997). The four ages of professionalism and professional learning. UNICORN, 23 (2), 86
108.
1246 Madiha Shah / Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 ( 2012 ) 1242 – 1246
[33] Jarzabkowski, L. M. (1999). Commitment and compliance: Curious bedfellows in teacher collaboration. Paper presented at the Australian
Association for Research in Education and New Zealand Association for Research in Education joint Conference (Nov 29-Dec 2),
Melbourne, Australia.
[34] Lieberman, A., & Miller, L. (1990). Teacher development in professional practice and school. Teachers College Record, 92 (1), 105
122.
[35] Goddard, R. D., & Skrla, L. (2006). The influen
Educational
Administration Quarterly, 42 (2), 216
235.
[36] Evans-Stout, K. (1998). Implications for collaborative instructional practice. In D. G. Pounder (ed.) Restructuring Schools for
Collaboration: Promises and Pitfalls (pp. 121
135). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
[37] Graves, D. H. (2001). Build energy with colleagues. Language Arts, 79 (1), 12
19.
[38] Hargreaves, A. (1995). Beyond collaboration: Critical teacher development in the postmodern age. In J. Smyth (ed.) Critical Discourses on
Teacher Development (pp. 149
179). London, UK: Cassell.
[39] Cousins, J. B., Ross, J. A., & Maynes, F. J. (1992). Teacher-teacher Interaction and Knowledge Use. Peterborough: Ontario Institute for
Studies in Education, Trent Valley Centre.
[40] Brownell, M. T., Yeager, E., Rennells, M. S., & Riley, T. (1997). Teachers working together: What teacher educators and researchers
should know. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20 (4), 340
359.
[41] Howe, R. J. (2007). A study of teacher collaboration in a dependent school-within-school: How do teachers perceive their collaborative
process and its effect on instruction? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Lowell.
[42] Wasley, P. A., Fine, M., Gladden, M., Holland, N. E., King, S. P., Mosak, E., & Powell, L. C. (2000). Small Schools: Great Strides- A Study
of New Small Schools in Chicago. New York, NY: Bank Street College of Education.
[43] Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001). Collaboration and the need for trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 39 (4), 308
331.
Creating and sustaining effective
professional learning communities, DfES Research Report RR637, University of Bristol. Available at
www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/RR637.pdf
[45] Leana, C. R., & Pil, F. K. (2006). Social capital and organizational performance: Evidence from urban public schools. Organization Science,
17 (3), 353
366.
[46] Schmoker, M. (1999). Results: The key to continuous school improvement (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
[47] Wald, P. J., & Castleberry, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). Educators as learners: Creating a professional learning community in your school.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[48] McDowell, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of work place differences among teachers in high and low performing urban high schools. Dissertation
Abstracts International, 65 (04), 1201. (UMI No. 3130352).
[49] Barrett, A. (2006). Collaboration as a best practice in Tennessee elementary schools. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from ProQuest
Dissertations and Theses Database (AAT 3234216).
[50] Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving Schools from Within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
[51] Rosenholtz, S. J. (1989). Workplace conditions that affect teacher quality and commitment: Implications for teacher induction programs. The
Elementary School Journal, 89 (4), 421
439.
[52] Lewis, A. C. (2002). School reform and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (7), 488
489.
[53] Gable, R., Mostert, M., & Tonelson S. (2004). Assessing professional collaboration in schools: Knowing what works. Preventing School
Failure, 48 (3), 4
9.
The Elementary School Journal, 87 (4), 385 396.
... For instance, recent research has shown that ECAs place significant value on their collegial relationships when making retention decisions (Miller & Youngs, 2021). Collegiality has been linked to collaboration among academics for the development of the professional knowledge and skills of ECAs (Miller & Youngs, 2021;Shah, 2012). Therefore, through joint research projects and the sharing of ideas and tasks in relation to teaching and learning between ECAs and other academics, a collegial relationship is developed. ...
... Second, collegiality strengthens the positive relationship between career advising on teaching and learning and the intentions of ECAs to stay in the academic profession. Previous studies have argued that collegiality is associated with collaboration among ECAs for the development of their professional knowledge and skills (Miller & Youngs, 2021;Shah, 2012) which include research, and teaching and learning. Third, on the contrary, the results showed that collegiality constrains the negative relationship between career advising on the achievement of professional goals and the intentions of ECAs to stay in the academic profession. ...
... The results show that socialisation between ECAs and other academics strengthens their collegial relationship in academia. A prior study has shown that collegiality among teachers in educational institutions is associated with enhanced enthusiasm and reduced emotional stress and burnout among academics (Karousiou et al., 2021;Shah, 2012). The results of the current study have policy implication for universities. ...
Article
This article examines the relationship between the career success of early career academics (ECAs), collegiality, and their intentions to stay in the academic profession. Two different surveys were developed and administered to ECAs (n=68) and other academics (n=219) from a public university in South Africa. The data were analysed using bivariate correlation and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The results revealed that career success factors that include career advising (research and teaching and learning), learning and development, rewards and recognition, and sociali-sation strengthen the intentions of ECAs to stay in the academic profession. Additionally, collegiality demonstrated a strong moderation effect on the relationship between career advising on research, teaching and learning and the intentions of ECAs to stay in the academic profession. The article further discusses the implications of the results in relation to how career success and collegiality reinforce the intentions of ECAs to stay in the academic profession. Free copy (eprint link): https://www.tandfonline.com/eprint/EXHS6PYU6X8NXDCIMH6C/full?target=10.1080/13611267.2024.2360377
... Collaboration and collegiality constitute and reflect one another in an ongoing process, meaning that both their appearance and their meaning can evolve and change over time (Kelchtermans, 2006). Collegiality among school professionals allows for a shift from an individualistic culture to the notion of a collaborative culture (e.g., Fullan & Edwards, 2021;Shah, 2012). Strong and healthy collegial relationships among school teachers are regarded as an essential component of school effectiveness and teacher enhancement (Shah, 2012). ...
... Collegiality among school professionals allows for a shift from an individualistic culture to the notion of a collaborative culture (e.g., Fullan & Edwards, 2021;Shah, 2012). Strong and healthy collegial relationships among school teachers are regarded as an essential component of school effectiveness and teacher enhancement (Shah, 2012). Collegiality also plays an important role in promoting growth and development, job satisfaction, organisational and professional commitment, and school quality and student achievement (Shah, 2012;Warren Little, as cited in Lieberman, 2012, p.470). ...
... Strong and healthy collegial relationships among school teachers are regarded as an essential component of school effectiveness and teacher enhancement (Shah, 2012). Collegiality also plays an important role in promoting growth and development, job satisfaction, organisational and professional commitment, and school quality and student achievement (Shah, 2012;Warren Little, as cited in Lieberman, 2012, p.470). However, we need to be well-aware of the fact that collaboration and collegiality do not occur in a vacuum but always emerge within a specific context at a specific time and can be seen as important working conditions for school professionals. ...
Article
Full-text available
p style="text-align: justify;">This paper presents the meaning and characteristics of collaboration between school counsellors, school principals, and teachers in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic in Slovenia and the extraordinary situation in which work in educational institutions changed dramatically overnight and the community of students and professionals moved into a virtual space. In the first part of the paper, we highlight that a strong network of professionals in an educational institution is key to achieving the vision, goals and quality of educational work. In the second part of the paper, we present the results of a survey conducted through an online questionnaire among 328 Slovenian counsellors during the first wave of COVID-19 in April 2020. The results of this survey show a positive attitude of counsellors towards collaboration with principals and teachers. The emergency situation has raised awareness among all school professionals about the importance of mutual support, while providing an opportunity to reflect on ways to improve mutual collaboration and build mutual relationships that enable quality pedagogical work. One of the biggest challenges for any school community now is to maintain the sense of alliance and mutual support that was created in many schools during the pandemic.</p
... Colleagues working together and creating a supportive educational environment may decrease the levels of tension and pressures that come naturally with the teaching profession (Jarzabkowski, 2002). Collegiality calls for the involvement of many individuals in solving educational dilemmas together; thus, creating a sense of belonging in the workplace (Shah, 2012). Collegiality is important as it yields various outcomes for novices per se as well. ...
... Knowing the challenges they face, novice teachers reported that among their coping strategies for teaching difficulties and tensions was relying on their significant colleagues' assistance (Pillen et al., 2013). Not only that but Shah (2012Shah ( , p. 1243) mentions that positive relationships make teachers "avoid the sink-or-swim, trial-and-error mode that novice teachers usually face during the initial stages of their career". In this vein, collegiality becomes a crucial part of the professional development of novice teachers even more adequate and relatable than other CPD activities (Smith, 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction: This research aims to discover the role of collegiality, as one of the internationally recognized tools for continuous professional development, in the professional growth journey of both novices and experts to give an insight into how effective, forming and maintaining healthy positive relationships, is to novice teachers per se. Methods: The research used a mixed-method approach to investigate the research questions. It included 18 teachers from the Department of English, Blida2 University; 8 novices, and 10 experts. The research used two questionnaires; one dedicated to novices to discover the role of collegiality in their professional development and the second one to experts to investigate the contribution of collegiality in their journey of professional growth and skill development. Results: In line with the data gathered, the results indicate that teachers’ collegiality is reasonably favorable by novices and highly recommended by expert teachers. Discussion: Novices tend to maintain positive relationships in the workplace as they believe they would expand their knowledge and skills repertoire and help them cope with the exhaustive emotional turmoil of stress and discomfort the new profession’s burden unfolds on them. Expert teachers, despite expressing not having benefitted particularly from collegiality in their professional development journey, tend to support and advocate for it for novice teachers today. They also tend to see themselves as responsible for the various pedagogical and psychological help they provide for novices to facilitate the challenging journey they face. Limitations: Despite its general concern among all teachers from different fields, the research was limited to a convenient sample from the Department of English, Blida2 Lounici Ali University. Conclusions: The research on collegiality adds to the literature on continuous professional development tools and is informative to teachers of all levels to invest in their collegial relationships for the pedagogical and psychological accompaniment of novice teachers per se.
... Lastly, to reinforce collegiality, leaders need to explicitly articulate common goals that bind the institution to ensure that the entire staff consent to a foundation for the vision, direction and goal accomplishment. Shah (2012) summarized the benefits of teacher collegiality in schools. Teacher collegiality significantly contributes to school improvement whereby successful schools are characterized by high levels of collegiality among teachers who are encouraged transition from the traditional norms of isolation and autonomy toward greater collegiality and collaboration. ...
... Lastly, schools that emphasize a positive collaborative culture and collegiality tend to have lower attrition rates since it helps teachers cope with uncertainty and complexity, respond resiliently to changes and take calculated risks. As an important energizer, collegiality allows teachers to form strong emotional connections with colleagues that in turn increases their instructional energy (Shah, 2012). ...
... Collaboration demands that teachers assist each other through cooperation, mentoring and knowledge sharing. It is a key to teachers' commitment to work and can bring about their job satisfaction (Madiha, 2012). ...
... This finding is in tandem with Madiha (2012) who noted that collaboration is a factor that can help teachers feel more committed to the school and teaching; Hulpia and Devo (2009) also concurred that collaboration is a key to teachers' job satisfaction in school. This implies that when teachers' share ideas, cooperate with other staff and receive support from colleagues, their love for the teaching job increases. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study used the descriptive survey design to investigate the influence of distributed leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction in Awka Educational Zone of Anambra State. Three research questions and three hypotheses guided the study. The population of the study comprises 487 teachers in rural and urban public secondary schools in Awka Educational Zone. Convenient sample technique was used to select 80 teachers for the study. The instrument of data collection was a structured questionnaire titled “Influence of Distributed Leadership on Teachers’ Job Satisfaction Questionnaire” (IDLTJSQ). A reliability coefficient of 0.83 of the instrument was obtained using Cronbach Alpha. Findings from the study revealed that teachers’ participation in decision making, teachers’ belonging to the leadership teams and teachers’ collaboration influence their job satisfaction. It was recommended that school principals should involve teachers in making decisions that concern their areas of specialization. They should create leadership teams and assign teachers important roles. . Keywords: Distributed Leadership, Collaboration, Job Satisfaction, Decision Making, Self�
... Teachers who collaborate with their colleagues are more likely to share their experiences, knowledge, and skills, providing opportunities for feedback and reflection that can lead to improved teaching practices (Opfer and Pedder, 2011;Chiong et al., 2017). Research has shown that teachers who engage in collaboration have higher levels of selfefficacy and job satisfaction (Skaalvik and Skaalvik, 2021), are more motivated (Shah, 2012) and are less likely to leave the profession (Heider, 2015). Moreover, teachers collaboration can lead to increased innovation and creativity: collaborating teachers can brainstorm new ideas and different approaches to teaching (Nielsen and Jensen, 2021), which can enhance the quality of education and provide students with more engaging and effective learning experiences (Carbone et al., 2019). ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The study presents the development and validation of the Teaching Approach Scale (TAS), a tool aimed at assessing teaching approaches in educational settings. Literature emphasizes the significance of collaboration and a student-centered approach in enhancing learning environments. However, the translation of these approaches into daily practices faces challenges due to entrenched traditions and individual perspectives. The TAS addresses this gap by assessing educators’ perspectives on teaching approaches. Method Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses carried on a sample of 642 teachers revealed four dimensions defining learning approaches: (a) Development of students’ autonomy, (b) Comparison and synergy in the teacher’s group, (c) Development of the student as a person, and (d) Standardization of teaching. Results and discussion The TAS serves as a valuable instrument for capturing teachers’ perspectives on teaching, thereby offering valuable insights for enhancing teaching practices and fostering professional development. Further studies need to face TAS validity and reliability, nevertheless, this study underscores the importance of considering teacher learning cultures in improving educational procedures, highlighting the role of individual perspectives in shaping teaching practices and learning environments.
Article
Donald H. Graves, in “Building Energy with Colleagues,” tells us that teachers are running out of energy because of the many demands put upon them in addition to their teaching. There are ways, though, to keep our energy and this article, based on an 18-month study, provides quite a few.
Chapter
'Burnout' was first investigated in the 1970s as a crisis of overextended and disillusioned human service workers. But the nature of the syndrome has changed with the evolutions in the nature of these professions. The current experience of burnout is lived out in a more difficult social context, with human service workers struggling harder for social credibility and job security. For instance, through the greater demands on their time and energy, teachers are being pressed to do more work with fewer resources, while receiving fewer rewards and less recognition of their efforts. The objective of this 1999 volume is to provide different perspectives and a deeper understanding of the nature, conditions and consequences of burnout, notably in the teaching profession. To do this, the contributions review much research in the field, describing research agenda and action agendas designed to combat the incidence of burnout in the workplace.
Article
The institutionalization of collaborative working environments is widely considered to be critical to the creation and maintenance of schools as professional learning communities. Prevailing thought suggests that improved student performance may be fully realized only when teachers routinely function as teams and abandon their traditional norms of isolationism and individualism. This interpretive study involving teachers in 45 North Louisiana schools suggests that while some schools and school districts are indeed characterized by elements of the 'learning community' others remain largely mired in customary practices that are counterproductive to realizing the newer collaborative standards. Participating teachers report that, despite the rhetoric, major impediments to joint professional work remain and they make suggestions for better meeting the continuing collaborative challenge.
Article
Teacher attrition has become a very serious problem in the United States in recent years. Studies have shown that many talented, new teachers are leaving the profession early in their careers due to feelings of isolation. In response to the alarming turnover rate, school districts have adopted mentoring programs which have been successful at making beginning teachers feel less isolated. This article examines four such mentoring programs and their potential to reduce teacher isolation.