The aim of this study was to explore the bus operating state of the city bus passenger corridor, taking the minimum bus operating cost and passenger travel cost as the objective function, taking passenger flow demand and operating income as the constraint, and considering the average speed change of the bus line in the bus corridor at different times. This paper proposes a dynamic optimization model of bus route schedule based on bus Integrated Circuit Card (IC Card) data. The optimization variable is the departure frequency of the candidate lines. To solve the model, a dynamic departure interval optimization method based on improved Genetic Algorithm (GA) was designed under different decision preferences. The method includes the calibration of generalized cost functions for passengers and bus companies and grasps the characteristics of bus operating speed changes and the design of departure strategies under different decision preferences. The validity and applicability of the proposed method are verified by a numerical example. We mainly carried out the following work: (1) Dynamic analysis of the time dimension of the bus departure interval takes into account the changes in passenger time characteristics during peak periods. (2) Seven schemes of weight ratio of passenger waiting time cost and bus operation cost were designed, and the departure intervals with different benefit orientations of passengers and operators were discussed, respectively, so as to select the corresponding departure schemes for decision makers under different decision preferences. The results show that (1) the total cost of the 7 different weighting schemes is lower than the actual value by 6.90% to 18.20%; (2) when decision makers need to bias the weight to the bus company, the weight ratio α : β between passengers and bus company is 0.25 : 0.75 which works best. The frequency of departures has been reduced by 6, and at the same time, the total optimized cost is reduced by 18.2%; (3) when decision makers need to bias the weight to the passengers, the weight ratio α : β between the passengers and bus company is 0.75 : 0.25 which works best. The frequency of departures has been increased by 19, and at the same time, the total optimized cost is reduced by 17.7%; and (4) when decision makers consider passengers and bus companies equally, the weight ratio α : β between passengers and bus companies is 0.5 : 0.5, the optimization cost is the closest to the actual cost, the optimization cost is reduced by 6.9%, and the frequency of departures has been increased by 5. The results show that the model in this paper provides a new idea for the information mining of bus routes in the research based on the bus IC Card data and provides an effective tool for the management of different operation decision preferences.
1. Introduction
Improper setting of bus line schedules will cause social and economic losses and potential safety hazards. Short departure intervals will waste resources and increase the financial pressure of the bus company. Too long intervals between departures will result in longer waiting times for passengers, a waste of time for passengers, and even the accumulation of people in public places, which may cause safety accidents [1]. The bus line optimization problem includes bus line path, line length, line nonlinear coefficient, line operation timetable, vehicle capacity, and so on [2]. The research problem of this paper is the departure schedule optimization of a single bus line in the commuter corridor. Starting from the departure schedule, this problem optimizes the travel waiting time and bus operation cost of passengers on the whole line, so as to achieve the goal of improving passengers’ riding experience and the income of bus companies [3]. Many rersearchers have conducted in-depth research on the optimization of bus timetable. At present, the research directions of bus line optimization mainly include single-line timetable optimization, cooperative optimization of multiline timetable, and considering the connection between bus and rail transit.
For single-line timetable optimization problems, Ma et al. [4] and Hassold and Ceder [5] took the passenger waiting time as the generalized cost of passengers, considered the bus operation cost and bus operation emission as the bus operation cost, and used GA to optimize the timetable. Using multisource bus data, Wen-zhou et al. [6] proposed a new time division method based on minimizing fleet operation time cost, established an optimization model with the goal of minimizing the cumulative fleet operation time cost throughout the day, and used GA to optimize the operation time division scheme. Wihartiko et al. [7], Wu et al. [8], and Tang and Yang [9] improved the GA by combining the integer programming model with the GA, setting the GA with local search and setting the quantum GA with penalty strategy to optimize the timetable for passengers and the generalized cost of bus companies. Bao-yu et al. [10] and Wang [11], respectively, designed the timetable optimization using K shortest path idea and max-min ant colony algorithm from the perspective of adding different types of buses to the operation line. Jun et al. [12], Wu et al. [13], and Zhang et al. [14] started with the service reliability of public transport companies, analyzed the suitability of bus arrival punctuality rate and passenger arrival time with the current operation timetable, and optimized the operation timetable with maximizing service reliability as a constraint. Some reasearchers considered the impact of signalized intersections in public transport operation. Among them, Jing et al. [15] considered the impact of public transport advance policy on social vehicles at signalized intersections and used simulated annealing algorithm and an event-driven policy combination model to optimize the timetable under the constraints of total line operation time and the negative impact of line operation on social vehicles at intersections. Bai et al. [16] considered the impact of the green light phase of the signal intersection on the line operation and optimized the bus schedule with the constraints of the average travel time and the average punctuality rate of the bus through the simulation software. Zhang et al. [17] and Gu et al. [18] proposed, from the perspective of data, the former uses the polynomial difference method to fill in the data for the lack of bus operation data and the latter uses back propagation (BP) and Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural networks to predict the boarding data of IC Card passengers and optimize the operation timetable. Yang et al. [19] proposed, from the perspective of energy conservation and emission reduction, an evaluation system for energy conservation and emission reduction when buses are driving on the road, and the bus schedule is optimized with emission pollution as the objective function.
For cooperative optimization of multiline timetable, Xu et al. [20] proposed a method to identify the direction of passengers getting off, transferring, and running based on the relationship between station attraction right, card swiping interval, and threshold. Zhang and Cao [21] calibrated the weight of passengers with different travel purposes, considered the demand of passengers with different travel purposes for equivalent time, and used GA to optimize the timetable. Chu et al. [22] considered the travel path selection of passengers in the area and used a mixed integer linear programming model and heuristic algorithm to optimize the operation timetable and pedestrian path selection at the same time. Jiang et al. [23], Wu et al. [24], and Guo-Jiang and Jian-Bo [25] used an enumeration method, GA based on nondominated sequence, and GA to optimize the operation schedule with the minimum total waiting time of passengers as the constraint. Wang and Cao [26] converted the loss of passengers caused by early and late vehicles into equivalent operating mileage. Aiming at minimizing the total operating mileage of multiple buses, considering passengers’ station constraints, bus capacity constraints, and passengers’ travel time window, they established a customized bus scheduling optimization model. Yang et al. [27] selected three kinds of public transit modes to establish a multimode public transit network and apply dimensionality reduction algorithm and the branch boundary method to optimize the transportation network.
Considering the connection between bus and rail transit, Takamatsu and Taguchi [28] established an event activity network to give vehicle timetable and passenger behavior in the backward areas of public transport in Japan and explored the rationality of train and bus transfer with the constraint of passenger transfer waiting time. Dou and Meng [29], based on exploring the rationality of the transfer between the terminal bus and the railway station, taking the minimization of passenger transfer waiting time as the constraint, and considering the bus capacity and passenger queuing attitude, established an MINLP model to optimize the timetable. Zheng-Wu and Ming-Qun [30] built a two-stage coordinated optimization of the operation lines of the corresponding feeder bus system at multiple transfer points for the mixed demand including reservation demand and real-time demand.
In summary, researchers at this stage are mainly concerned with the impact of the setting of bus schedules on passengers and bus companies. There are few studies on the changes in operating speed caused by the influence of social vehicles during bus operation. This article focuses on the itinerary optimization of a single line in the public transportation service corridor, extracting passenger flow characteristics from IC Card data, and grasping the characteristics of the travel time between stations on the target line on the target line based on the IC Card data of the passenger on the target line. GA is used to optimize the timetable with the travel cost model of the bus company to discuss the departure interval under different decisions.
2. Methodology
2.1. Problem Description
In the optimization of a single bus line, the departure interval of the bus at different times affects the bus service level, which is expressed by the total time cost of passengers and the operating cost of the bus company. In the research on the travel of passengers on bus lines, the travel time and travel OD matrix of passengers can be calculated according to the bus IC Card data. The research objective of this paper is to determine the dynamic departure interval of bus lines in different periods of working days. According to the obtained passenger IC Card swiping data, this paper makes the following assumptions:(1)The running speed of the bus between bus stops is constant, which is calculated by the average running speed between two stations in different time periods(2)There is no passenger capacity limit during the operation of the bus, which means that passengers at all stations can be loaded by the next bus currently waiting(3)The dimensions and operating parameters of public transport vehicles are the same
Based on the abovementioned assumptions, it is determined that the main research content of this paper is the impact of passenger travel demand in different time periods and different bus speeds in different time periods on bus schedule planning.
Passenger travel demand and bus operating speed change at different times. Therefore, the research time range of this paper needs to include the peak period and peak period of passenger travel in a day, in which the passenger travel characteristics and bus operating speed are extracted through IC Card data.
The main work of this paper is shown in Table 1, problem-solving framework, which is mainly divided into three parts: Part I: basic data acquisition: it includes obtaining necessary data such as the number of passengers arriving in the time period and the running speed of buses in different periods between stations Part II: design and modeling of different decision preferences: the different weights between passenger waiting and bus company operating costs are designed, and the GA is used to solve the optimal cost and the corresponding departure schedule Part III: result analysis: the optimized timetable is compared with the existing departure timetable, and the feasibility of optimizing the timetable is discussed
Steps
Main work
Eliminating useless data of IC Card
Data preprocessing
Determining peak and off-peak periods
Determining the optimization period
Extracting card swiping time data and analyzing passenger flow characteristics of card swiping time data and bus running speed
Key factor analysis
Weighting design under different decision preferences of optimization of departure schedule by GA
Model solving
Comparison between the optimized and original departure timetable
Analysis