ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Mixed-gender friendships, romantic relationships, and sexual behaviors increase during adolescence as a normal part of development. However, some studies have revealed potential risks to these types of social relationships. Different authors have indicated that dating violence among adolescents is an issue for concern. To date, there has been little research on this topic cross-nationally. This study examined and compared the prevalence and characteristics of physical dating violence among young people aged between 15 and 18 years in England and Spain (N = 200 in Spain, N = 199 in England), and how being involved (or not) in this violence relates to romantic relationship quality. Results indicated that approximately 23% of young people reported victimization and 30% reported perpetrating physical dating violence. In both countries, most of those involved in physical dating violence reported involvement in reciprocal violence (displaying both aggression and victimization). Those young people involved in dating violence reported higher levels on scales assessing negative aspects of relationship quality compared with those not involved, but there were no significant differences in positive aspects of relationship quality. Furthermore, different patterns appeared relating to the severity of violence and country. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and practice. © The Author(s) 2015.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
1 –23
© The Author(s) 2015
Reprints and permissions:
DOI: 10.1177/0886260514567963
Physical Dating
Violence in Spain and
the United Kingdom
and the Importance of
Relationship Quality
C. Viejo,1 C. P. Monks,2 V. Sánchez,3
and R. Ortega-Ruiz1,2
Mixed-gender friendships, romantic relationships, and sexual behaviors
increase during adolescence as a normal part of development. However,
some studies have revealed potential risks to these types of social
relationships. Different authors have indicated that dating violence among
adolescents is an issue for concern. To date, there has been little research
on this topic cross-nationally. This study examined and compared the
prevalence and characteristics of physical dating violence among young
people aged between 15 and 18 years in England and Spain (N = 200 in
Spain, N = 199 in England), and how being involved (or not) in this violence
relates to romantic relationship quality. Results indicated that approximately
23% of young people reported victimization and 30% reported perpetrating
physical dating violence. In both countries, most of those involved in physical
dating violence reported involvement in reciprocal violence (displaying both
aggression and victimization). Those young people involved in dating violence
reported higher levels on scales assessing negative aspects of relationship
quality compared with those not involved, but there were no significant
1University of Cordoba, Spain
2University of Greenwich, London, UK
3University of Seville, Spain
Corresponding Author:
Carmen Viejo, University of Cordoba, Avda. San Alberto Magno s/n, 14004 Cordoba, Spain.
567963JIVXXX10.1177/0886260514567963Journal of Interpersonal ViolenceViejo et al.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
2 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
differences in positive aspects of relationship quality. Furthermore, different
patterns appeared relating to the severity of violence and country. The
findings are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and practice.
dating violence, physical violence, and cultural contexts
Throughout the last decade, there has been increasing interest in the study of
dating behavior. International developmental studies have shown that mixed-
gender friendships, romantic relationships, and sexual behaviors increase
during adolescence (e.g., Carver, Joyner, & Udry, 2003). This is underlined
by the fact that three out of every four boys and girls have had at least one
dating partner by the time they reach late adolescence (Connolly, Furman, &
Konarski, 2000; Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Sánchez, Ortega-Rivera,
Ortega, & Viejo, 2008; Viejo, Sánchez, & Ortega, 2013). These relationships
can provide personal and social benefits for those involved. Adolescent dat-
ing experiences are associated with higher indices of social acceptance, peer
competence among friends and classmates, affirmation of social status, the
development of intimacy (Furman, Low, & Ho, 2009) and sexual identity,
and first sexual encounters (Ortega-Rivera, Sánchez, & Ortega, 2010). They
also contribute to the enhancement of personal variables linked to well-being,
such as identity achievement and psychological adjustment (Bouchey, 2007;
Braithwaite, Delevi, & Fincham, 2010; Shaffer & Furman, 2009, among oth-
ers). On the contrary, other studies have revealed potentially negative aspects
to this type of social relationship, noting that romantic relationships are
sometimes related to limited autonomy, aggressive and/or delinquent behav-
iors, and so on (Joyner & Udry, 2000; Shaffer & Furman, 2009).
There has been a considerable amount of social and scientific attention
focused on the negative aspects of dating relationships, due in part to their
potentially adverse outcomes, as well as some studies that have viewed this
form of violence as a precursor for subsequent gender violence among adult
couples (Cáceres & Cáceres, 2006; O’Leary & Smith-Slep, 2003). Since
1957, when Kanin published the first article on this topic, a growing number
of studies on dating violence have been carried out, first in the United States
and Canada and later in Europe.
Even though most of the earlier studies on adolescent dating violence came
out of the tradition of research into domestic violence and gender violence, it
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 3
has been found that adolescent dating violence has its own characteristics that
differ from those identified among adult couples. Dating violence within
young couples is not an isolated behavior, but a common one, showing preva-
lence rates that range from 9% to 65% (e.g., Lewis & Fremouw, 2001;
Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Muñoz-Rivas, Graña, O’Leary, & González,
2007; Sánchez et al., 2008) depending on the behaviors measured, the instru-
ments used, and the terminology used (Archer, 2006; Cáceres & Cáceres,
2006). An international study conducted with university students from 16 dif-
ferent countries reported that there was a high level of involvement in each
country studied but that there were differences between the countries in the
patterns of aggressive behavior reported (Straus, 2004). A more recent interna-
tional review (Leen et al., 2013) underlined that adolescent dating violence is
a pressing international issue; even when individual studies report different
specific results, the overall findings indicate that this is reported by young
people in various countries and, at least for victimization, rates are comparable
across Europe and North America.
Research has considered a variety of behaviors under the Dating Violence
label: physical, verbal, relational, and sexual (Saltzman, Fanslow, McMahon,
& Shelley, 2002). Nonetheless, most studies have focused on physical dating
violence (Capaldi & Owen, 2001; Nocentini, Menesini, & Pastorelli, 2010;
Nocentini et al., 2011; Viejo, 2014), presumably because it is an easily
defined type of violence, can be measured by different questionnaires with
empirical validity, and has clearly demonstrable negative consequences for
emotional and physical health (Banyard & Cross, 2008; Fernández-Fuertes &
Fuertes, 2010; Orpinas, Hsieh, Song, Holland, & Nahapetyan, 2013).
Recent studies have indicated higher rates of involvement among those
who are “occasionally” involved in “moderate” violence: Victimization is
reported by about 23% of participants and aggression by about 30% (Katz,
Washington-Kuffel, & Coblentz, 2002; Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Viejo,
2014). Archer (2006) noted that it may be misleading to talk about high levels
of violence when the instruments used in the research refer to behaviors that
are lower in intensity, such as slaps around the face. Some aggressive behav-
iors have been related to the developmental process of courtship or dating
and the social skills involved in that process. Ortega and Sánchez (2011) have
proposed that involvement in aggression could be a normal pattern of behav-
ior during the initial stages of the romantic relationship, a kind of dirty dating
as these authors have named it. This is supported by Pellegrini (2001) who
found that boys and girls in early adolescence use different behaviors (which
may be aggressive) toward the opposite sex. Boys tend to use more physical
forms of aggression than girls, whereas girls are more likely to use verbal
forms, such as insults or ironic jokes. Ortega and Sánchez noted that these
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
4 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
aggressive behaviors may form part of the relational dynamic, which is being
established in these nascent couples. In this way, these aggressive behaviors
may be well-received by the opposite sex as an indication of interest on the
part of the perpetrator.
This idea is consistent with several studies that have underlined one of the
most common characteristics of dating violence: a reciprocal aggressive
dynamic established between partners in a relationship in which mutual vio-
lence, which may not be very severe and is relatively infrequent, occurs
(Capaldi, Shortt, & Kim, 2005; Echeburúa, Fernández-Montalvo, Corral, &
López-Goñi, 2009; Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Menesini, Nocentini,
Ortega-Rivera, Sanchez, & Ortega, 2011; Swahn, Alemdar, & Whitaker,
2010; Viejo, 2014). Even when different patterns of aggression are reported
within the couple, the main consistent feature is the reciprocity of the acts and
lack of an imbalance in power (Menesini et al., 2011; Olson, 2002). However,
Archer (2000) noted that when we refer to more severe aggressive behaviors,
such as those that can result in injury, boys are generally more likely to be
aggressors, and girls are more likely to be victims.
Archer (2006) reported that the level of dating aggression and the direc-
tion of the aggression are related to various cultural factors including the
role of women in that society, the prominence of patriarchal ideas, and level
of female empowerment, among others. Archer suggested that among devel-
oped Western countries, cultural elements would affect not only the estab-
lished relational dynamics within the family but also the development of
violent patterns of behavior. Goodwin (2013) also noted the importance of
considering differences between “contact” cultures and “non-contact” cul-
tures proposed by Hall (1976). For example, Southern European students
were found to touch more, stand closer, face one another directly, or keep
eye contact longer than students from “non-contact” cultures such as
Northern Europe. These social relational patterns may also influence the
standardized contact pattern that is accepted within the relationship.
However, there are very few studies that have compared the experiences of
dating violence among young people in different countries, even when the
previous literature indicates that there are cultural differences not only when
defining dating relationships but also in interpreting behaviors within these
relationships (Leen et al., 2013; Nocentini et al., 2011; Straus, 2004). In this
regard, variables related to the couple context (in terms of its relational
dynamic and perceived quality) have been identified as being important due
to their influence on dirty dating dynamics (Ortega & Sánchez, 2011).
Capaldi et al. (2003, 2005) noted that the characteristics of the couple and
the dynamics of their relationship were determining factors in dating vio-
lence. Conflicts may contribute to the establishment of a negative
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 5
relationship dynamic, which some authors have identified as a dynamic of
the escalation of conflict (Straus & Gelles, 1987). However, the findings in
this area are not conclusive. On one hand, some studies have found a strong
relationship between the negative quality of the relationship (such as high
rates of conflict, jealousy, or an imbalance of power) and an increased risk
of involvement in mild physical dating violence (Fernández-Fuertes &
Fuertes, 2010; Giordano, Soto, Manning, & Longmore, 2010; O’Leary &
Smith-Slep, 2003; Vezina & Hebert, 2007). On the other hand, other authors
such as Giordano et al. (2010) and Ortega, Sánchez, and Ortega-Rivera
(2008) reported that some positive aspects of the relationship, such as love
or feeling cared for by their partner, are also reported by young people who
have experienced violence within their relationships. Thus, if people
involved in dating violence interpret these aggressive behaviors in terms of
demonstrating attention directed toward them and as possible signals of
someone’s interest in them, then it is less likely that this aggression will have
a negative influence on their perception of the quality of their relationship
(Giordano et al., 2010), being an expression of dirty dating (Ortega, Sánchez,
& Ortega-Rivera, 2008).
The current study aimed to advance this line of research by analyzing dat-
ing violence in two developed European countries: Spain and the United
Kingdom. Previous studies have examined different forms of violence in both
countries (Genta et al., 2011; Lehdonvirta & Räsänen, 2011; Monks, Palermiti,
Ortega, & Costabile, 2011). These studies have indicated that there are cul-
tural differences which may affect aggressive behaviors. The predominant
culture within the United Kingdom is identified as relatively liberal, with a
commitment to full employment and the equal inclusion of men and women.
Furthermore, since the 1990s, the prevention of teen violence has been on the
political agenda in the United Kingdom. Spain, however, while sharing some
basic features with British culture, is identified as a Latin country, where the
interpersonal contact network, that is, who you know, is important. Within
Spain, a male “breadwinner” culture persists and policies for the prevention
and intervention in youth violence were only implemented a few years ago
when, for various social reasons, the problem increased exponentially
(Goodwin, 2013; Junger et al., 2007; Lehdonvirta & Räsänen, 2011). The
International Human Development Indicators (United Nations Development
Programme, 2014) identified the United Kingdom and Spain as being coun-
tries with very high human development, ranked 14 and 27 (out of 187),
respectively. However, focusing on the role of males and females in the two
societies (Gender Inequality Index), Spain was found to have a lower level of
gender inequality than the United Kingdom (ranked 16 and 35 out of 187,
respectively). Although both countries are among those that are higher in
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
6 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
terms of equality, it is possible that differences in gender equality may relate
to differences between the two countries in dating violence.
Dating violence is still a developing line of research in Spain (Medina-
Ariza & Barberet, 2003; Muñoz-Rivas et al., 2007; Ortega, Ortega-Rivera, &
Sánchez, 2008; Sanchez et al., 2008) and the United Kingdom (Archer &
Ray, 1989; Barter, McCarry, Berridge, & Evans, 2009; Burman & Cartmel,
2005; Hird, 2000; Schütt, 2006). Spanish data have shown very similar
results to international data: Around 30% of adolescents, both boys and girls,
are involved or have been involved in this type of violence, although moder-
ate forms of violence are more frequent than severe forms (Echeburúa et al.,
2009; Muñoz-Rivas et al., 2007, among others). None of these studies have
shown significant sex differences in involvement. Research has also indi-
cated that adolescents are also more likely to be involved in reciprocal rather
than unidirectional violence within their relationship (Menesini et al., 2011),
meaning that both partners behave aggressively toward each other. This
reciprocal dynamic is the main dynamic for moderate violence, whereas uni-
directional violence is more common for severe violence (Viejo, 2014).
Regarding the quality of these relationships, Sánchez et al. (2008) found that
adolescent Spanish couples reported medium to high levels of quality within
their relationships, with females being more satisfied than males.
Research in the United Kingdom has been scarce, leading some recent
studies to extrapolate U.S. data to the United Kingdom due to the dearth of
literature directly related to U.K. samples (Barter et al., 2009; Layard &
Dunn, 2011). Even when European studies on dating violence have been con-
sidered together, the U.K. data have been treated separately (Leen et al.,
2013). Focused on a U.K. sample, a preliminary study by Archer and Ray
(1989) reported a high incidence of some forms of violence within adolescent
couples (college students), with girls being more aggressive than boys. Since
then, only a few studies have focused on dating violence in the United
Kingdom. A study carried out by Hird (2000) indicated that similar levels of
males and females were involved in physical violence (about 15% of males
and 14% of females had experienced physical violence during the previous
year), which is accordance with Barter et al.’s (2009) results but higher than
those reported by Burman and Cartmel (2005). However, none of these stud-
ies provides information relating to the roles of involvement in the aggression
(aggressor, victim, or both). Furthermore, none of them have examined any
variables related to the couple or quality of their relationship. Although not
specifically focused on dating relationships, a UNICEF (2006) report found
that there were differences between young people in different countries in
their perceptions of peer relationships; in particular, young people in the
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 7
United Kingdom had more negative peer perceptions than young people in
some other countries, including Spain.
Thus, the current literature on dating violence indicates that it is an impor-
tant field for further studies that can focus on providing more details on its
forms and the similarities or differences among countries and different cul-
tures. The present study represents a cross-national study of Spain and the
United Kingdom, aimed on: (1) measuring the prevalence and forms (magni-
tude and direction of aggression) of physical dating violence in both coun-
tries; and (2) performing an exploratory analysis of the characteristics of the
couple (in terms of relationship quality) in relation to involvement in dating
violence and taking into consideration the severity and direction of the
aggressive behavior.
This study was developed within a larger project on dating and dating vio-
lence. In all, 399 adolescents from Spain (N = 200) and England (N = 199)
participated in the current study. They were aged between 15 and 18 years
(M = 16.77; SD = 1.15). The English sample was from two urban secondary
schools in South East England serving lower- to middle-class catchment
areas. One was mixed sex and the other was a boys’ school; the English sam-
ple contained a predominance of male adolescents (71.1% males vs. 28.9%
female). Both were state schools. The Spanish sample was representative of
schools in South Spain, from the eight cities within the Andalusian region, so
state and fee-paying schools were included, serving very different class
catchment areas. All selected schools in Spain were mixed and the sample
included equal numbers of boys and girls.
Table 1 shows the general sample characteristics as well as the character-
istics for each country.
We used a key question about their present or previous romantic experi-
ences to identify the dating status of adolescents: 19% of adolescents had not
had any romantic experience (15.9% of the Spanish sample and 22.4% of the
English sample), 50.3% had had a past romantic relationship in the last 6
months (Spanish: 48.7%; English: 51.9%), and 30.7% had a current romantic
relationship (Spanish: 35.4%; English: 25.7%).
Analyses were focused on those who had had any romantic experience
(past or present), leaving a final sample of 306 adolescents (164 Spanish and
142 English).
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
8 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
The present and past romantic status of the participants was assessed using a
question taken from the Dating Questionnaire (Connolly et al., 2000).
Participants were asked to select the sentence that best described their current
dating status from four options: I have never had boy/girlfriend; I have a boy/
girlfriend right now; I have more than one boy/girlfriend right now; and I do
not have a boy/girlfriend right now, but have had one within the last 6 months.
The couple context variables were assessed by the Network Relationships
Inventory (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985) and an adaptation of Peer
Orientation–Couple Questionnaire (Fuligni & Eccles, 1993). The Network
Relationships Inventory measured four scales, three related to positive qual-
ity (communication: three items, α = .87, for example, I tell my boyfriend/
girlfriend everything; commitment: three items, α = .76, for example, I spend
my free time with my boyfriend/girlfriend; and expectations for the future:
three items, α = .88, for example, Even when we disagree I’m sure this rela-
tionship will last) and one scale related to negative quality (conflicts: six
items, α = .91, for example, My boyfriend/girlfriend and I get annoyed with
each other’s behavior). The Peer Orientation–Couple Questionnaire assessed
transgressive behavior (four items, α = .69, for example, How much does the
amount of time you spend with your boyfriend/girlfriend keep you from doing
the things you should do, like homework or chores?). Two more items were
included in the Peer Orientation Scale to assess an imbalance of power: When
you are with your boyfriend/girlfriend, how often does someone tend to be the
boss in this relationship? When you are with your boyfriend/girlfriend, how
often does he or she try to control the clothes you wear or the friends you
have? (α = .82; r = .70).
To measure physical dating violence, an adaptation of the Conflict Tactics
Scale (CTS; Straus, 1979, Straus et al., 1996) was used. The original scale
was adapted to an adolescent population (Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Viejo,
Sánchez, & Ortega-Ruiz, 2014): Nine items assessed mild (α = .67, for
Table 1. Sample Characteristics.
Spain UK Total
N200 199 399
Girls (%) 46.0 28.9 38.1
Boys (%) 54.0 71.1 61.9
M age 16.72 (SD = 1.31) 16.80 (SD = 0.95) 16.77 (SD = 1.15)
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 9
example, pushing, grabbing, or shoving) and severe aggression (α = .82, for
example, choked partner), and nine items assessed mild (α = .70, for exam-
ple, slapped by the partner) and severe victimization (α = .79, for example,
slammed by the partner against a wall).
All the questionnaires were translated into Spanish and back-translated to
English by a native speaker. All measures were used previously in Spanish
studies and were validated with confirmatory factor analysis on Spanish ado-
lescents (Viejo, 2012).
Questionnaires were completed during school time. Consent for participation
in the study was obtained from the head-teacher and the parents/guardians of
the adolescents. Participation was completely voluntary: The participants
were told that they did not have to take part in the study if they did not wish
to and that confidentiality and anonymity would be assured. The research was
approved by the research ethics committees of the co-authors’ universities.
Participants took around 40 min to complete the questionnaire for the
whole larger project.
The results obtained in this study are presented in this section. In relation to
the aims of this study, initial analyses were performed to examine the preva-
lence and forms of physical dating violence (severity and direction of aggres-
sion) in both countries. Gender differences were also considered. Second,
variables relating to the context of the couple, in terms of the quality of the
romantic relationship, were analyzed in relation to involvement, or not, in
physical dating violence.
Physical Dating Violence in Spain and the United Kingdom
In keeping with previous studies (Menesini & Nocentini, 2008; Viejo, 2014),
the original Likert-type scale was recoded into a 3-point scale: not involved
in violence (0 = never in the original scale), occasional involvement (1 =
rarely), and frequent involvement (2 = sometimes, 3 = lots of times, and 4 =
always). Table 2 shows the results obtained for adolescent involvement in
moderate and severe physical dating violence, by country, sex, and frequency
of behavior.
For the Spanish sample (N = 164), the results indicated that involvement
in physical violence in Spain ranged from 12.2% for mild aggression, to
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
10 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
24.5% for severe aggression. Most involvement was occasional, and frequent
involvement was not higher than 2.5%, which was obtained for the most
severe forms of aggression and victimization. The only significant sex differ-
ence was for mild victimization, although the effect size was low, t(146.310) =
2.049, p = .042, r = .17, with boys reporting higher levels than girls (.313 vs.
For the United Kingdom (N = 142), the results indicated that involvement
in physical violence ranged from 21% for serious victimization to 30.1% for
mild aggression. It was also the case that most were involved “occasionally,”
with the highest level of frequent involvement being for severe victimization
(9.7%). There were no significant sex differences.
Despite the finding that the results were slightly higher in the United
Kingdom than in Spain, t tests indicated that the only significant difference
between countries was for mild aggression, t(218) = −2.475, p = .014, r = .16,
with more adolescents from the U.K. sample being involved than those in the
Spanish sample.
Table 2. Physical Dating Violence Involvement.
Spain UK
Mild aggression
Total 81.8 17.6 0.6 68.9 26.2 4.9
Boys 81.7 18.3 0 68.4 23.7 7.9
Girls 81.8 16.9 1.3 68.8 31.3 0
Mild victimization
Total 77.8 20.4 1.9 71 22.6 6.5
Boys 72.3 24.1 3.6 71.8 20.5 7.7
Girls 83.5 16.5 0 75 25 0
Severe aggression
Total 75.5 22 2.5 72.1 23 4.9
Boys 69.5 28 2.4 68.4 23.7 7.9
Girls 81.8 15.6 2.6 75 25 0
Severe victimization
Total 79 18.5 2.5 79 11.3 9.7
Boys 83.1 13.3 3.6 82.1 5.1 12.8
Girls 74.7 24.1 1.3 75 25 0
Note. Spain: N = 164 (boys, n = 85; girls, n = 79); United Kingdom: N = 142 (boys, n = 86;
girls, n = 38; missing, n = 18).
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 11
Finally, the form of involvement of adolescents in both countries was
examined. In accordance with previous studies (Moffitt & Caspi, 1998), we
considered aggression, victimization, and reciprocal violence separately.
Figure 1 shows the percentage of adolescents in each role for each country.
Exclusive aggression or victimization involvement was less frequent than
reciprocal involvement, and there were no significant sex differences by role.
Chi-square tests were used to examine the role of involvement (not
involved, aggression only, victimization only, and reciprocally involved) for
moderate and severe violence across the two countries. There were no signifi-
cant differences between the Spanish and U.K. samples for involvement in
moderate violence, χ2(3, N = 219) = 3.789, p = .285, Cramer’s V = .132, or
severe violence, χ2(3, N = 219) = 2.063, p = .559, Cramer’s V = .097.
Couple Context Variables: Quality of the Romantic Relationship
and Physical Dating Violence in Spain and the United Kingdom
The second aim of this study examined the couple context variables in terms
of the quality of the romantic relationships in relation to involvement in phys-
ical dating violence. According to previous results, we considered indepen-
dently those reciprocally involved in violence and those involved in only
aggression or victimization (but not both). The results were assessed sepa-
rately for the Spanish (N = 164) and U.K. (N = 142) samples (Tables 3 and 4).
Moderate PVDSevere PDVModerate PVDSevere PDV
15.10% 13.80%
6.70% 8.30%
7.50% 6.70% 3.30%
Not involved
Reciprocal involvement
Figure 1. Roles for PDV involvement.
Note. PDV = physical dating violence.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Table 3. Spain: PDV Involvement and Quality (N = 164).
Mild PDV Severe PDV
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
Transgressive behavior 1.49 (0.66) 1.96 (0.54) 1.53 (0.43) 1.48 (0.65) 1.68 (0.64) 1.68 (0.46) 1.54 (0.62)
Imbalance of power 1.47 (0.60) 2.07 (0.78) 1.98 (0.96) 1.49 (0.64) 1.77 (0.79) 1.95 (0.88) 1.59 (0.72)
Conflicts 2.12 (0.81) 2.73 (0.88) 2.63 (0.99) 2.06 (0.83) 2.57 (0.87) 2.94 (0.74) 2.25 (0.89)
Communication 3.73 (1.12) 3.34 (1.14) 3.55 (1.11) 3.60 (1.16) 3.93 (0.95) 3.48 (1.15) 3.63 (1.16)
Closeness 3.93 (0.96) 3.88 (0.80) 3.94 (0.94) 3.89 (0.97) 4.15 (0.74) 3.82 (1.01) 3.89 (0.99)
Expectation for the future 3.37 (1.32) 2.93 (1.12) 3.08 (1.16) 3.21 (1.30) 3.51 (1.27) 3.19 (1.10) 3.22 (1.30)
Note. Considering mild violence and severe violence separately, those groups showing significant differences have been shaded in the table. PDV =
physical dating violence.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Table 4. The United Kingdom: PDV Involvement and Quality (N = 142).
Mild PDV Severe PDV
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
M (SD)
Transgressive behavior 1.84 (0.64) 1.91 (0.93) 2.35 (0.99) 1.85 (0.75) 2.07 (0.64) 2.35 (0.92) 2.01 (0.85)
Imbalance of power 2.04 (1.07) 2.13 (1.03) 2.96 (1.14) 2.00 (0.99) 2.71 (1.62) 3.00 (0.97) 2.30 (1.15)
Conflicts 2.39 (0.82) 2.63 (1.12) 3.23 (0.57) 2.37 (0.78) 3.02 (1.14) 3.22 (0.69) 2.61 (0.89)
Communication 3.67 (0.95) 3.50 (1.27) 3.58 (0.82) 3.68 (0.90) 3.57 (1.44) 3.47 (0.85) 3.40 (1.08)
Closeness 4.07 (0.88) 4.00 (0.96) 3.63 (0.83) 4.08 (0.81) 3.90 (1.15) 3.59 (0.92) 3.75 (0.90)
Expectation for the future 3.41 (1.13) 3.29 (0.82) 2.60 (1.18) 3.35 (1.06) 3.14 (1.29) 2.77 (1.30) 2.79 (1.13)
Note. Considering mild violence and severe violence separately, it has been colored those groups showing significant differences. PDV = physical
dating violence.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
14 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
An overall comparison of the two countries showed that the participants in
the U.K. sample reported having poorer quality dating relationships than the
Spanish participants, shown by higher scores on the negative scales and
lower scores on the positive scales. Unrelated samples t tests indicated that
significant differences were mainly on the negative scales: with medium–
high effect size on transgressive behaviors: t(155.754) = −4.577, p = .000,
r = .35; imbalance of power: t(135.285) = −5.222, p = .000, r = .41; and lower
effect size on conflict: t(248) = −3.136, p = .002, r = .20; accompanied by
statistically lower scores in expectations for the future, t(244.546) = 2.823,
p = .005, r = .18.
To examine this further, the results obtained in each country for couple
quality were analyzed in relation to involvement in violence. According to
previous studies, no involvement, unilateral involvement, and reciprocal
involvement were considered.
In relation to moderate physical dating violence, in Spain, the ANOVAs
showed significant differences for the negative quality scales: transgressive
behaviors, F(2, 137) = 3.645, p = .029, η2 = .05; imbalance of power, F(2,
137) = 8.622, p = .000, η2 = .11; and conflicts, F(2, 130) = 5.770, p = .004,
η2 = .08. In all cases, the differences were between those unilaterally involved
in aggression or victimization and those not involved. In the United Kingdom,
the differences only appeared in imbalance of power, F(2, 56) = 3.570, p =
.035, η2 = .11, and conflicts, F(2, 55) = 5.076, p = .009, η2 = .16, and the dif-
ferences were between reciprocal involvement and those not involved, with
those reciprocally involved scoring higher on these variables.
Regarding severe physical dating violence, using a series of ANOVAs, the
same patterns were found for Spain and the United Kingdom. Only imbal-
ance of power—F(2, 137) = 4.225, p = .017, η2 = .06 in Spain; F(2, 56) =
4.241, p = .019, η2 = .13 in the United Kingdom—and conflicts—F(2, 130) =
10.386, p = .000, η2 = .14 in Spain; F(2, 55) = 5.870, p = .005, η2 = .18 in the
United Kingdom—showed statistical differences, having higher rates for
those reciprocally involved in physical dating violence than those not
This cross-national study aimed to examine in some depth the phenomenon
of physical dating violence in Spain and the United Kingdom considering not
only the main characteristics of this form of violence but also comparing it
across two European countries. A cross-national comparison of dating vio-
lence is valuable as research has indicated that there may be differences
between countries that might shape the characteristics of the romantic
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 15
relationships related to aggressive behaviors, even when the phenomenon of
dating violence has shown very similar rates around Europe (Leen et al.,
2013; Straus, 2004). The current study has added to the research in this field.
Regarding the measurement of the prevalence and forms of physical dat-
ing violence in both countries, our study reported similar data for Spain and
the United Kingdom. Looking broadly, the findings indicate an infrequent
and reciprocal involvement as the most common pattern for both boys and
girls, both in Spain and the United Kingdom. However, more detailed analy-
ses show that there are some interesting differences between the two
About 25% of the adolescents surveyed in Spain and the United Kingdom
reported involvement in physical dating violence (either moderate or severe
forms). These rates are very similar to those reported in previous interna-
tional studies (Katz et al., 2002; Menesini & Nocentini, 2008) but higher than
those found in earlier studies in the United Kingdom (Barter et al., 2009;
Hird, 2000). However, they are closer to levels reported in previous Spanish
studies (Muñoz-Rivas et al., 2007; Sánchez et al., 2008), even considering
that occasional violence is reported by more participants than frequent vio-
lence (Foshee & McNaughton Reyes, 2011; O’Leary & Woodin, 2009).
There appeared to be some differences by country in relation to the sever-
ity of the behavior. The results in the current study indicated slightly different
patterns for Spain and the United Kingdom. The pattern of results found in
the U.K. sample is similar to that reported in other studies, with more involve-
ment in milder forms of violence than in the most severe forms (aggression:
31.1% vs. 27.9%; victimization: 29% vs. 21%). However, in Spain, this pat-
tern is slightly different. For victimization, involvement is slightly higher for
milder forms compared with severe forms (22.2% vs. 21%). However, the
trend is reversed in relation to involvement in aggression, with involvement
in severe forms higher than involvement in milder forms (18.2% vs. 24.5%).
According to Archer (2006), this could relate to cultural influences on the
interpretation of dating violence. Severe forms are more common in Spain
than in the United Kingdom may be because, in Spain, those mild expres-
sions of violence are more accepted and the adolescents go ahead. Goodwin
(2013) noted that some studies based on cross-cultural differences related to
relationships have established a difference between “contact” cultures and
“non-contact” cultures (Hall, 1976). In contrast to Spain, which is considered
to be a “contact” culture, the predominant culture in the United Kingdom is
“non-contact”; thus, probably many of the mild aggressive contact behaviors
are more censured in the United Kingdom than in Spain.
Nevertheless, perhaps it could also relate to a methodological issue. As
indicated by Viejo et al. (2014), this may be because the original version of
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
16 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
the CTS (Straus et al., 1996) considered all of these behaviors within a single
factor of violence, including more mild and serious types of violence (beat-
ing, trying to choke, etc.). Thus, the questionnaire itself could difficulty this
double identification for the adolescents. However, Viejo et al. noted that
girls were more sensitive to the differentiation in terms of the severity of the
type of behavior than boys, which replicates data in the current study.
Finally, in relation to the directionality of the violence, as the previous
literature has shown (Menesini et al., 2011; Swahn et al., 2010), most of those
who were involved in physical dating violence did not take just one role
within the violence, most were reciprocally involved (in both aggression and
victimization). In this sense, and in contrast to what Archer (2006) found and
what might be suggested by considering the Gender Inequality Index (United
Nations Development Programme, 2014)), young people in Spain and the
United Kingdom report similar patterns of behavior and experiences in rela-
tion to dating violence.
Considering these characteristics of the phenomenon, it could be pre-
sumed that most of these young people were involved in dirty dating as
described by Ortega and Sánchez (2011). Such a dynamic could be a crude
way of establishing a dating relationship and would not be perceived by ado-
lescents as being “real violence.” If this is the case, then aggressive behavior
may be used occasionally and in its more moderate forms. However, cur-
rently it is not possible to conclude: this is a tentative hypothesis as in this
study it has not been assessed in relation to the significance of the violence
for those involved; this requires further, more in-depth, analysis.
The second aim of the study was regarding the relationship between cou-
ple context variables (relationship quality) and involvement (or not) in physi-
cal dating violence. According to previous studies (Fernández-Fuertes &
Fuertes, 2010; O’Leary & Smith-Slep, 2003; Vezina & Hebert, 2007), the
couple context variables are the key risk factors for dating violence, and rela-
tionship quality has been identified as one of the most influential. The find-
ings from the current study indicate that the quality of Spanish adolescents’
relationships is similar to that reported in previous studies (Sánchez et al.,
2008), and that the quality of dating relationships reported by young people
in the United Kingdom differs mainly in terms of the negative scales.
Relatedly, it has been also reported that British adolescents have relatively
negative perceptions of their peer relationships in comparison with young
people in other countries (including Spain; UNICEF, 2006). This negative
perception of peer relationships could be extended to dating relationships as
well, which may account for the higher endorsement of negative scales in the
current study, mainly relating to power imbalance and conflicts. Previous
studies have identified poor relationship quality as a risk factor for physical
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 17
dating violence involvement (Fernández-Fuertes & Fuertes, 2010; O’Leary
& Smith-Slep, 2003; Vezina & Hebert, 2007). In the current study, the only
differences between those involved and not involved in physical dating vio-
lence were found in relation to the negative relationship quality scales, not
the positive relationship quality scales. Previous studies have pointed out that
the maintenance of positive dynamics within violent relationships reveals a
complex undercurrent of conflict resolution, elements of intimacy, and satis-
faction that makes it more difficult to withdraw from the relationship
(Giordano et al., 2010).
Nevertheless, when examining the data in relation to the severity of the
behavior, the pattern is different for moderate and severe violence as well as
for Spain and the United Kingdom. Regarding the most severe forms of vio-
lence, those Spanish and English adolescents who were reciprocally involved
in physical dating violence reported higher rates of conflict and power imbal-
ance in their relationship. This is in agreement with previous studies focused
on other forms of violence, which include unilateral and reciprocal involve-
ment. For example, research on bullying has found that those who are identi-
fied as bully-victims (who bully others and are bullied by others) often have
more adjustment problems than those who are bullies or victims (Arseneault
et al., 2006). The sample size did not enable us to examine the role of the
adolescent and their perceptions in depth; future studies could examine
whether the differences are related only to involvement (unilateral, recipro-
cal, or not involved) or also to whether an individual is the aggressor or
Moderate forms of violence present a more complex pattern. Spanish ado-
lescents who were not involved or reciprocally involved were not found to
differ on relationship quality; however, those who were unilaterally involved
reported poorer quality relationships. According to previous studies that sug-
gest that reciprocal involvement in moderate violence may be related to dirty
dating (Menesini et al., 2011; Sánchez et al., 2008; Viejo, 2014), it is possible
that those adolescents involved in this kind of violence may not perceive their
relationships as problematic. As Pellegrini (2001) pointed out, they use these
moderately violent behaviors as signals indicating interest in others or from
others. However, as this has not been directly assessed in the current study,
this is still a hypothesis.
Among the U.K. adolescents, the findings for moderate violence followed
the same pattern for severe violence: Those reciprocally involved in violence
reported the worst rates of quality in their relationships. These data differ from
the Spanish data, and although it is not possible to draw firm conclusions, they
may reflect cultural differences. It is possible that for English adolescents,
dirty dating may not occur, or at least not for physical forms of violence.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
18 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
According to Goodwin (2013), and related to the “contact” cultures versus
the “non-contact” cultures, it could be possible that adolescents in the United
Kingdom use more verbal and relational aggression as a form of dirty dating
but not physical aggression, as physical forms are considered more intrusive
and thus with more negative consequences. In this line, studies of adoles-
cents’ attitudes toward violence have reported that young people who present
less tolerance to violence are less involved in dating aggression and victim-
ization than those with higher tolerance (Muñoz-Rivas, Gámez-Guadix,
Fernández-González, & González-Lozano, 2011). Furthermore, the context
where aggression occurs is very salient for adolescents (Sears, Byers, Whelan,
& Saint-Pierre, 2006). To date, we are not aware of studies developed in the
United Kingdom regarding attitudes toward dating violence or the role of the
specific context in the justification of dating violence by individuals. Future
studies considering attitudes and also other forms of violence, including other
forms of physical violence, are needed to examine this directly.
Although the sample size and the non-balanced gender distribution have
limited the analyses performed, this work represents a step forward in our
understanding of the phenomenon of dating violence in the United Kingdom
where this is still relatively under-researched. At the same time, this repre-
sents an innovation in terms of making a cross-cultural comparison of Spain
and the United Kingdom, highlighting that contextual factors are key to
understanding this complex phenomenon.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article.
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research,
authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the project
“Violencia Escolar y Juvenil: los riesgos del cortejo violento, la agresión sexual y el
ciberacoso (PSI-2010-17246)” into the National I+D+i.
Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A
meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651.
Archer, J. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in physical aggression between partners:
A social-role analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 133-153.
Archer, J., & Ray, N. (1989). Dating violence in the United Kingdom: A pre-
liminary study. Aggressive Behavior, 15, 337-343. doi:10.1002/1098-
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 19
Arseneault, L., Walsh, E., Trzesniewski, K., Newcombe, R., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T.
E. (2006). Bullying victimization uniquely contributes to adjustment problems in
young children: A nationally representative cohort study. Pediatrics, 118, 130-
138. doi:10.1542/peds.2005-2388
Banyard, V. L., & Cross, C. (2008). Consequences of teen dating violence under-
standing intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women,
14, 998-1013. doi:10.1177/1077801208322058
Barter, C., McCarry, M., Berridge, D., & Evans, K. (2009). Partner exploitation and
violence in teenage intimate relationships. London, England: National Society
for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.
Bouchey, H. A. (2007). Perceived romantic competence, importance of romantic
domains, and psychosocial adjustment. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent
Psychology, 36, 503-514. doi:10.1080/15374410701653120
Braithwaite, S. R., Delevi, R., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). Romantic relationships and
the physical and mental health of college students. Personal Relationships, 17(1),
1-12. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01248.x
Burman, M., & Cartmel, F. (2005). Young people’s attitudes towards gendered vio-
lence. Edinburgh: NHS Scotland.
Cáceres, A., & Cáceres, J. (2006). Violencia en relaciones íntimas en dos etapas evo-
lutivas [Dating Violence in two different developmental stages]. International
Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 6, 271-284.
Capaldi, D. M., & Owen, L. (2001). Physical aggression in a community sample of
at-risk young couples: Gender comparisons for high frequency, injury and fear.
Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 425-440. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.15.3.425
Capaldi, D. M., Shortt, J. W., & Crosby, L. (2003). Physical and psychological
aggression in at-risk young couples: Stability and change in young adulthood.
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 1-27.
Capaldi, D. M., Shortt, J. W., & Kim, H. K. (2005). A life span developmental system
perspective on aggression toward a partner. In W. M. Pinsof & J. Lebow (Eds.),
Family psychology: The art of the science (pp. 141-167). Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Carver, K., Joyner, K., & Udry, R. (2003). National estimates of adolescent roman-
tic relationships. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relationships and
sexual behaviors: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 23-56).
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Connolly, J., Furman, W., & Konarski, R. (2000). The role of peers in the emergence
of heterosexual romantic relationships in adolescence. Child Development, 71,
1395-1408. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00235
Echeburúa, E., Fernández-Montalvo, J., de Corral, P., & López-Goñi, J. J. (2009).
Assessing risk markers in intimate partner femicide and severe violence: A
new assessment instrument. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 925-939.
Fernández-Fuertes, A., & Fuertes, A. (2010). Physical and psychological aggression
in dating relationships of Spanish adolescents: Motives and consequences. Child
Abuse & Neglect, 34, 183-191. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.01.002
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
20 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Foshee, V. A., & Reyes, H. L. (2011). Adolescent dating abuse: Primary prevention
efforts. In J. R. Levesque (Ed), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 615-624). Springer
Fuligni, A. J., & Eccles, J. S. (1993). Perceived parent-child relationships and early
adolescents’ orientation toward peers. Developmental Psychology, 29, 622-632.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985).Children’s perceptions of the personal rela-
tionships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1024.
Furman, W., Low, S., & Ho, M. J. (2009). Romantic experience and psychosocial
adjustment in middle adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent
Psychology, 38(1), 75-90. doi:10.1080/15374410802575347
Genta, M. L., Smith, P. K., Ortega, R., Brighi, A., Guarini, A., Thompson, F., . . .
Calmaestra, J. (2011). Comparative aspects of cyberbullying in Italy, England,
and Spain. In Q. Li, D. Cross & P. Smith (Eds.), Cyberbullying in the Global
Playground: Research From International Perspectives, (pp. 15-31). U.K.:
Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781119954484.ch2
Giordano, P. C., Soto, D. A., Manning, W. D., & Longmore, M. A. (2010). The char-
acteristics of romantic relationships associated with teen dating violence. Social
Science Research, 39, 863-874. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.03.009
Goodwin, R. (2013). Personal relationships across cultures. London: Routledge.
Hall, M. (1976). The theory of groups (Vol. 288). New York: American Mathematical
Hird, M. (2000). An empirical study of adolescent dating aggression in the U.K.
Journal of Adolescence, 23, 69-78. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0292
Joyner, K., & Udry, J. R. (2000). You don’t bring me anything but down: Adolescent
romance and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 41, 369-391.
Junger, M., Feder, L., Clay, J., Côté, S. M., Farrington, D. P., Freiberg, K., &
Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Preventing violence in seven countries: Global con-
vergence in policies. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 13
(3-4), 327-356.
Kanin, E. (1957). Male aggression in dating–courtship relations. American Journal of
Sociology, 63, 197-204. doi:10.1086/222177
Katz, J., Washington-Kuffel, S., & Coblentz, A. (2002). Are there gender differences
in sustaining dating violence? An examination of frequency, severity, and rela-
tionship satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 17, 247-271.
Layard, R., & Dunn, J. (2011). A good childhood: Searching for values in a competi-
tive age. Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
Leen, E., Sorbring, E., Mawer, M., Holdsworth, E., Helsing, B., & Bowen, E. (2013).
Prevalence, dynamic risk factors and the efficacy of primary interventions for
adolescent dating violence: An international review. Aggression and Violent
Behavior, 18, 159-174. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.11.015
Lehdonvirta, V., & Räsänen, P. (2011). How do young people identify with online
and offline peer groups? A comparison between UK, Spain and Japan. Journal of
Youth Studies, 14(1), 91-108.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 21
Lewis, S. F., & Fremouw, W. (2001). Dating violence: A critical review of the litera-
ture. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 105-127.
Medina-Ariza, J., & Barberet, R. (2003). Intimate partner violence in Spain:
Findings from a national survey. Violence Against Women, 9, 302-322.
Menesini, E., & Nocentini, A. (2008). Dating aggression in adolescence. Giornale
Italiano di Psicologia, 2, 405-430.
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Ortega-Rivera, J., Sanchez, V., & Ortega, R. (2011).
Reciprocal involvement in adolescent dating aggression: An Italian–Spanish
study. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 437-451. doi:10.108
Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (1998). Implications of violence between intimate part-
ners for child psychologists and psychiatrists. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 39, 137-144. doi:10.1017/S0021963097001819
Monks, C. P., Palermiti, A., Ortega, R., & Costabile, A. (2011). Peer-victimisation
in preschools: A cross-national comparison of England, Spain and Italy. Spanish
Journal of Psychology, 14, 129-140.
Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Gámez-Guadix, M., Fernández-González, L., & González-
Lozano, M. P. (2011). Validation of the Attitudes About Aggression in Dating
Situations (AADS) and the Justification of Verbal/Coercive Tactics Scale (JVCT)
in Spanish adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 575-584.
Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., Graña, J. L., O’Leary, K. D., & González, M. P. (2007).
Aggression in adolescent dating relationships: Prevalence, justification, and
health consequences. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 298-304.
Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., & Pastorelli, C. (2010). Physical dating aggression
growth during adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 353-365.
Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Pastorelli, C., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W.
(2011). Physical dating aggression in adolescence: Cultural and gender invari-
ance. Journal of European Psychologist, 16, 278-287. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/
O’Leary, K. D., & Smith-Slep, A. M. (2003). A dyadic longitudinal model of adoles-
cent dating aggression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32,
314-327. doi:10.1207/S15374424JCCP3203_01
O’Leary, K. D., & Woodin, E. M. (2009). Psychological and physical aggression in
couples: Causes and interventions. Washington, DC: American Psychological
Olson, M. E. M. (2002). Power and prosperity. Quarterly Journal of Austrian
Economics, 5(2), 85-87.
Orpinas, P., Hsieh, H. L., Song, X., Holland, K., & Nahapetyan, L. (2013). Trajectories
of physical dating violence from middle to high school: Association with relation-
ship quality and acceptability of aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,
42, 551-565. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9881-5
Ortega, R., Ortega-Rivera, J., & Sánchez, V. (2008). Violencia sexual entre compa-
ñeros y violencia en parejas adolescentes [Sexual harassment among peers and
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
22 Journal of Interpersonal Violence
adolescent dating violence]. International Journal of Psychology and
Psychological Therapy, 8, 63-72.
Ortega, R., & Sánchez, V. (2011). Juvenile dating and violence. In C. P. Monks &
I. Coyne (Eds.), Bullying in different contexts (pp. 113-136). London, England:
Cambridge University Press.
Ortega, R., Sánchez, V., & Ortega-Rivera, J. (2008, June 23-25). Quality of dating
relationships in Spanish adolescents: A study of dating violence. Paper presented
at 4th Conference of Violence in School and Public Policies, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ortega-Rivera, J., Sánchez, V., & Ortega, R. (2010). Violencia sexual y cortejo juve-
nil [Sexual harassment and youth courtship]. In R. Ortega (Ed.), Agresividad
injustificada, bullying y violencia escolar [Unjustified aggression, bullying and
school violence] (pp. 211-232). Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
Pellegrini, A. (2001). A longitudinal study of heterosexual relationships, aggression,
and sexual harassment during the transition from primary school thorough middle
school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22, 119-133. doi:10.1016/
Saltzman, L. E., Fanslow, J. L., McMahon, P. M., & Shelley, G. A. (2002). Intimate
partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data ele-
ments: Version 1.0. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.
Sánchez, V., Ortega-Rivera, J., Ortega, R., & Viejo, C. (2008). Las relaciones senti-
mentales en la adolescencia: satisfacción, conflictos y violencia [Romantic rela-
tionships in adolescence: Satisfaction, conflicts and dating violence]. Escritos de
Psicología, 2, 97-109.
Schütt, N. (2006). Domestic violence in adolescent relationships: Young people in
Southwark and their experiences with unhealthy relationships. Southwark, UK:
Safer Southwark Partnership.
Sears, H. A., Byers, E. S., Whelan, J. J., & Saint-Pierre, M. (2006). If it hurts you,
then it is not a joke: Adolescents’ ideas about girls’ and boys’ use and experience
of abusive behavior in dating relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
21, 1191-1207.
Shaffer, L., & Furman, W. (2009). Rewards and costs in adolescent other-sex friend-
ships: Comparisons to same-sex friendships and romantic relationships. Social
Development, 18, 270-287.
Straus, M. A. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and aggression: The Conflict
Tactics Scale (CTS). Journal of Marriage and the Family, 41, 75-88.
Straus, M. A. (2004). Prevalence of violence against dating partners by male and
female university students worldwide. Violence Against Women, 10, 790-811.
Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1987). The costs of family violence. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 2, 212-222.
Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., Boney-McCoy, S., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The
revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2) development and preliminary psychometric
data. Journal of family issues, 17(3), 283-316.
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
Viejo et al. 23
Swahn, M., Alemdar, M., & Whitaker, D. (2010). Nonreciprocal and reciprocal dat-
ing violence and injury occurrence among urban youth. Brief Research Report,
XI, 264-268.
UNICEF. (2006). The state of the world’s children 2007: Women and children—The dou-
ble dividend of gender equality (Vol. 7). New York, US: UNICEF NY. Retrieved
United Nations Development Programme. (2014). Sustaining human progress:
Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience (Human development reports)
New York, US: UNDP. Retrieved from
Vezina, J., & Hebert, M. (2007). Risk factors for victimization in romantic relation-
ships of young women: A review of empirical studies and implications for pre-
vention. Trauma, Violence and Abuse, 8, 33-66. doi:10.1177/1524838006297029
Viejo,C. (2012). Dating violence y cortejo adolescente. Un estudio sobre la violen-
cia en las parejas sentimentales de los jóvenes andaluces. (Unpublished thesis
manuscript). University of Cordoba, Spain.
Viejo, C. (2014). Violencia física en las relaciones sentimentales adolescentes: hacia
la comprensión del fenómeno [Physical dating violence: Towards a comprehen-
sible view of the phenomenon]. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 37, 785-815.
Viejo, C., Sánchez, V., & Ortega, R. (2013). The importance of adolescent dating
relationships. Psicothema, 25(1), 43-48.
Viejo, C., Sánchez, V., & Ortega-Ruiz, R. (2014). Violencia física en la pareja ado-
lescente: la potencialidad interpretativa de un modelo bifactorial [Physical dating
violence: The potential understanding value of bi-factorial model] . Anales de
Psicología, 30(1), 171-179.
Author Biographies
C. Viejo is a Lecturer in Psychology in the Department of Psychology at the University
of Cordoba (Spain). Her primary areas of research are Dating Violence and
Adolescent’s Development.
C. P. Monks is a Senior Lecturer in Psychology in the Department of Psychology and
Counselling at the University of Greenwich, U.K.. Her primary areas of teaching are
research methods and developmental psychology. Her researching field is Bullying
and Interpersonal Violence during childhood and adolescence.
V. Sanchez is a Senior Lecturer in Psychology in the Department of Educational and
Developmental Psychology at the University of Seville, Spain. Her researching field
is Emotional and Relational Development and Adolescence.
R. Ortega-Ruiz is Professor in Psychology in the Department of Psychology at the
University of Cordoba, and visiting Professor in the Department of Psychology and
Counselling at the University of Greenwich. Her primary areas of teaching and research
are Bullying, School Violence and Adolescent Dating Relationships. Dr. Ortega is the
lider of the LAECOVI laboratory (
at UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA on February 2, 2015jiv.sagepub.comDownloaded from
... Archer (2000) states that physical partner violence is usually driven by similar triggering stimuli in both partners, which evoke reciprocal negative emotions and bidirectional violent behavior. In fact, the literature indicates the predominance of two-way TDV, in which both boys and girls assume the role of both victim and aggressor (Alegría & Rodríguez, 2015;Ocampo-Álvarez et al., 2018;Viejo et al., 2016). ...
... For the no/ low TDV perpetration class, no significant differences were found in terms of gender distribution (54% boys, 47% girls; p = .11). Class 2 (39% of the sample), labeled as jealousy/ manipulation TDV perpetration, grouped people with a low probability on most of the TDV behaviors, but a relatively high probability of exhibiting behaviors related to jealousy ("I made him/her jealous", "I accused him/her of being with Cava et al., 2015;Cuenca & Graña, 2016;Foshee et al., 2013;Muñoz-Rivas et al., 2022;Ocampo-Álvarez et al., 2018;Reidy et al., 2016;Rojas-Solís et al., 2019;Viejo et al., 2016). Only 10.6% (9.6% boys; 11.5% girls) played an exclusively aggressor role in unidirectional TDV, whereas 6.3% (7.7% boys; 4.8% girls) were only victims of TDV. ...
... Some authors state that certain aggressions appear at such early ages that the victims have no information or experience (González & Santana, 2001;Montilla et al., 2017). Authors such as Viejo et al. (2016) relate the increase in violence in young couples to clumsy forms of courtship or lack of experience due to their young age. In short, relational TDV perpetration and more severe physical TDV behaviors could be considered adequate indicators of TDV severity, as well as warning signs for early detection. ...
Full-text available
Purpose Teen dating violence (TDV) refers to harmful behavior perpetrated in the context of the relationship between adolescents. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of perpetration TDV according to gender and to identify latent classes of young people with different patterns of behavior. Methods The sample consists of 862 secondary school students (50.2% girls and 49.8% boys) of different Spanish regions, with an average age of 14.1 years. TDV was measured in a cross-sectional study applying a latent class analysis. Results It was found that TDV is mainly bidirectional and is present in 57.2% of participants of both genders. Only 10.6% were exclusively aggressors, and 6.3% were victims only. A high probability of perpetration behaviors appears especially for verbal-emotional TDV (65.4%), compared to physical TDV (20.1%) and relational TDV (15.7%). The categorical nature of TDV perpetration was shown by a three-class model (none/low TDV perpetration; jealousy/manipulation TDV perpetration; high TDV perpetration). Only gender differences were observed for jealousy/manipulation TDV. Conclusions Results suggest that TDV is mostly bidirectional, with verbal/emotional violence being more common than physical and relational violence. TDV coheres into three latent classes (low, jealousy/manipulation, and high), of which the middle profile is more common among girls than boys.
... Dating violence (DV) is a worldwide serious social and public health problem (Dosil et al., 2022;Soller et al., 2020;Taylor & Mumford, 2016), with a prevalence rate ranging from 23% to 30% (Viejo et al., 2016), despite of victimization rates vary depending on the characteristics of the samples (i.e., gender, age, race/ethnicity, country, measurement instruments) (Exner-Cortens et al., 2021;Shamu et al., 2016). In this regard, in a meta-analytic review, Wincentak et al. (2017) found that one in ten adolescents reported victimization in their dating relationship. ...
... First, the results revealed the existence of victimization in adolescent dating relationships (32.8% of the sample), in line with previous studies that have examined the prevalence of this phenomenon (Viejo et al., 2016;Marcos et al., 2022). This finding is consistent with the need to emphasize that this type of victimization is a serious social and public health problem (Dosil et al., 2022;Soller et al., 2020); which should be addressed in the educational, social and health fields among the younger population, to: a) minimise the mismatch between the perception of objective victimization and subjective victimization; b) reduce violent behaviours in dating relationships; c) raise awareness of the severity of violent behaviours that occur in interpersonal relationships. ...
... Se trata de una problemática social y de salud pública que ha llamado la atención de distintas disciplinas, sobre todo por su alta prevalencia y los efectos que conlleva en la salud física y psicológica de esta población . Al respecto, diversos estudios demuestran que la comunidad científica ha centrado su atención en el impacto y los aspectos negativos de este problema (Viejo et al., 2016); por lo tanto, se han desarrollado muchas investigaciones con la intención de dilucidar los factores de riesgo y consecuencias más importantes, desde un ámbito individual hasta uno sociocultural (véase Capítulo 7). ...
Full-text available
RESUMEN El presente libro ha sido generado en el seno del Grupo de Investigación: “Análisis de Relaciones Interpersonales: Pareja, Familia y Organización” (Facultad de Psicología, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla) y el Centro de Psicología Integral (Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla) el cual aborda un fenómeno con gran prevalencia y numerosos estragos, la problemática social de la violencia que se ejerce hacia mujeres y hombres en las parejas de jóvenes. Es así como a lo largo de sus trece capítulos se presenta: 1) la contextualización de la adolescencia y adultez emergente, 2) la caracterización de la pareja, 3) las principales características de la violencia en las relaciones de pareja, 4) las principales teorías explicativas del fenómeno, 5) las diferentes tipologías de la violencia, 6) la ciber violencia de la pareja, 7) los principales factores de riesgo, 8) así como los principales factores de protección en la violencia de pareja, 9) el fenómeno de la violencia de pareja en la comunidad LGBT+, 10) la prevalencia de la violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo, 11) algunas dificultades conceptuales y metodológicas asociadas a su estudio, 12) la prevención de la violencia de pareja en estas edades y, finalmente, 13) algunas consideraciones científicas y prácticas en el abordaje de esta problemática. Alejado de apasionamientos ideológicos o intereses personales o de grupo, cada capítulo ha sido revisado (sistema peer review) por al menos cuatro especialistas contribuyendo así a elevar su rigurosidad académica,teórica, técnica y científica brindando así al lector interesado en la materia una obra confiable para su consulta; ojalá que cumpla con su cometido. Palabras Clave: Violencia en el noviazgo, revisión sistemática, prevención, intervención, adolescente, joven, mexicano. ABSTRACT This book has been generated within the Research Group: «Analysis of Interpersonal Relationships: Couple, Family and Organization» (Department of Psychology, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla) and the Integral Psychology Center (Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla) and addresses a phenomenon with great prevalence and numerous ravages, the social problem of violence against women and men in young couples. Thus, throughout its thirteen chapters it presents: 1) the contextualization of adolescence and emerging adulthood, 2) the characterization of the couple, 3) the main characteristics of violence in couple relationships, 4) the main explanatory theories of the phenomenon, 5) the different typologies of violence, 6) the cyber violence of the couple, 7) the main risk factors, 8) as well as the main protective factors in couple violence, 9) the phenomenon of intimate partner violence in the LGBT+ community, 10) the prevalence of violence in dating relationships, 11) some conceptual and methodological difficulties associated with its study, 12) the prevention of intimate partner violence in these ages and, finally, 13) some scientific and practical considerations in addressing this issue. Far from ideological passions or personal or group interests, each chapter has been reviewed (peer review system) by at least four specialists, thus contributing to increase its academic, theoretical, technical and scientific rigor, thus providing the reader interested in the subject with a reliable work for consultation; hopefully it will fulfill its purpose. Key Words: Dating Violence, Systematic Review, Prevention, Intervention, Adolescent, Youth, Mexican
... Se trata de una problemática social y de salud pública que ha llamado la atención de distintas disciplinas, sobre todo por su alta prevalencia y los efectos que conlleva en la salud física y psicológica de esta población . Al respecto, diversos estudios demuestran que la comunidad científica ha centrado su atención en el impacto y los aspectos negativos de este problema (Viejo et al., 2016); por lo tanto, se han desarrollado muchas investigaciones con la intención de dilucidar los factores de riesgo y consecuencias más importantes, desde un ámbito individual hasta uno sociocultural (véase Capítulo 7). ...
... Adolescents are in a life stage where they are going through physical and psychological changes, developing intimacy and sexual identity, and starting romantic dating relationships, but they are also among the age groups who are most at risk of either committing or experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) (Viejo et al. 2016;Tomaszewska and Schuster 2021). Health education on this phenomenon is therefore significant and important. ...
... This is the second most frequent case of violence after violence against wives. According to Viejo et al. (2016), dating violence negatively correlates with relationship quality. It means that poor dating relationship quality increases the likelihood of violence occurring. ...
Full-text available
Dating relationship is time for individual get to know his partner before decide to get married or not. Therefore, dating relationship quality become important because poor dating relationship quality can negatively affect marital relationship quality. Prior researcher found that individual’s attachment can affect dating relationship quality and self-compassion can mediated attachment and relationship quality. The mechanism of attachment effect was also found to be mediated by self-compassion but this still needs further investigation. The objective of this research is to examine the role of self-compassion in mediating attachment and relationship quality. This research uses quantitative research method by distributing online questionnaire. Total participant of this research is 176 people. Mediation analysis in this research using PROCESS within SPSS. The result of this research shows that self-compassion cannot mediating attachment and dating relationship quality. In other words, individual’s behavior toward himself did not affect individual’s perception toward his relationship or his partner. The next researchers are suggested to do dyadic research, analyses using type of attachment, and examine deeper about self-compassion as the mediator variable.
... Dating violence is a major social problem relating to numerous health issues, including depressive symptoms, psychological distress, anxiety, mental health problems, posttraumatic stress, antisocial behavior, and relationship problems (Volpe et al., 2012). Research indicates that dating violence negatively affects relationship quality (Viejo et al., 2016), causes conflict (Narayan et al., 2014), and diminishes well-being (Van Ouytsel et al., 2017) as well as life satisfaction (Cava et al., 2021). ...
The existing literature on dating violence identifies a number of antecedents to dating violence but few studies situate attitudes toward dating violence within attachment theory and the gender role perspective while also accounting for gender differentiations in attitudes toward dating violence. This is a correlational study examining the relationships between attachment styles, egalitarian gender roles, and attitudes toward dating violence. In a sample of 574 college students, results demonstrated a significant low level correlation between avoidant attachment style, egalitarian gender roles, and attitudes toward dating violence. Mediation analysis results showed that egalitarian gender roles significantly mediate the relationship between avoidant attachment dimension and attitudes toward dating violence, while moderation analysis showed that gender is a significant moderator for avoidantly attached individuals. The conditional indirect effect and index of moderated mediation were also significant for the avoidant attachment dimension. The results are discussed in light of the literature on attachment and gender roles. Supplemental data for this article is available at [INSERT LINK FOR REFERENCES].
Full-text available
El número de estudios sobre la violencia escolar y juvenil ha aumentado en los últimos años y sus resultados resaltan el importante papel de las competencias socioemocionales a la hora de prevenir o intervenir en estas conductas. No obstante, los hallazgos científicos a menudo están desconectados entre sí y además no siempre son accesibles a los profesionales que trabajan en la prevención e intervención contra la violencia. Por ello, en el presente artículo se realiza una exhaustiva revisión de estudios científicos sobre diferentes conductas problema, la importancia de la prevención de la violencia escolar y juvenil y su relación con las competencias socioemocionales. Igualmente, se resumen los componentes principales de los programas que han mostrado ser efectivos contra diferentes tipos de violencia y que incluyen componentes para la promoción de las competencias socioemocionales. Se proporcionan algunas claves para la práctica con base en los resultados científicos y propuestas de futuro.
Full-text available
Ethnic background and cultural roots affect how individuals think, feel, and behave. These factors have only recently begun to be considered in family therapy training and practice. Differences among groups need to be valued and integrated into family therapy practice. The authors provide an overview of ethnic and cultural issues in clinical work with African American, Hispanic, Irish, Asian Indian, and Jewish clients.
Full-text available
Within the complex social world that young people inhabit, in addition to traditional forms of bullying, we find other negative forms of relations which share some characteristics with bullying in terms of dominance and submission. This is true for ‘dating violence’, which we discuss in this chapter. We explore individual factors in relation to involvement in dating violence (both aggressors and victims) and the way that the peer network can ‘cover up’ the problem. We address the roles of affective-emotional links and the appearance of interpersonal violence within the network, as well as the inclusion of negative models of couples. We propose that the appearance of dominance-submission-control-violence within the first romantic relationships during adolescence may originate in the behaviours and attitudes of the peer-group. Early data on this topic (Ortega, 2008b) suggest that forms of indirect relational violence may appear within dating relationships and are aimed at controlling the behaviour, attitudes and feelings of the partner, and are difficult to detect and difficult to stop. Sexual violence, on the other hand, is worryingly more present during these first dating relationships than we thoughtp. The importance of the first romantic relationships in adolescence The biological changes that accompany adolescence play an important role in the changes which occur in the interpersonal relationships of adolescents. With sexual maturity, changes in the levels of hormones and the development of secondary sexual characteristics, adolescents begin to feel sexual attraction for others.
Full-text available
This paper presents a study about peer and dating sexual harassment among adolescents. Specifically, differences by sex, age and the developmental stage of the romantic relationships were analyzed in both, peer and dating sexual harassment in a sample of 490 adolescents (55,7% boys and 44,3% girls, mean age 16.08). Descriptive data showed that the presence of peer and dating sexual harassment was similar. Boys were more perpetrators in both, peer and dating contexts but no differences by sex were found for victimization indexes. An important effect of the developmental-stage of the relationships was found: peer sexual harassment were more frequent in "casual" and "mixed gender" stage whereas dating sexual harassment was more frequent in "serious relationship". For age, just differences in dating sexual harassment were found: older adolescents were more involved than younger ones.
Full-text available
El presente estudio supone una primera aproximación descriptiva al estudio de la calidad de las relaciones sentimentales adolescentes y a la presencia de comportamientos violentos en estas primeras relaciones. Se entrevistó a 446 adolescentes de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria y Bachillerato (47.50% chicos, 52.50% chicas, edad media 16.08 años) con relación a la satisfacción con sus relaciones de pareja, sus expectativas, grado de comunicación, presencia de conflictos, poder, comportamiento transgresivo y violencia. Los resultados descriptivos han mostrado que las relaciones de pareja durante la adolescencia son muy importantes para los chicos y chicas dado que el 90% de éstos afirmaron haber tenido alguna experiencia sentimental. Los adolescentes afirmaron estar muy satisfechos con sus relaciones sentimentales, siendo las chicas y los participantes de mayor edad los que más satisfacción y expectativas mostraron. Con relación a los problemas de violencia, los resultados han mostrado una implicación alta, aunque ocasional, de chicos y chicas con independencia de la edad y del comportamiento analizado: agresión y victimización.
This article presents rates of violence against dating partners by students at 31 universities in 16 countries (5 in Asia and the Middle East, 2 in Australia-New Zealand, 6 in Europe, 2 in Latin America, 16 in North America). Assault and injury rates are presented for males and females at each of the 31 universities. At the median university, 29% of the students physically assaulted a dating partner in the previous 12 months (range = 17% to 45%) and 7% had physically injured a partner (range = 2% to 20%). The results reveal both important differences and similarities between universities. Perhaps the most important similarity is the high rate of assault perpetrated by both male and female students in all the countries.
The associations of frequent physical aggression, injury, and fear were examined for a community-based sample of at-risk young couples who were dating, cohabiting, or married. It was hypothesized that frequent physical aggression toward a partner, in the range of shelter samples, is largely caused by antisocial behavior and mutual couple conflict and, thus, that there would be greater similarity across genders in such behavior than has previously been supposed. It was also predicted that levels of injury and fear would be higher in women but that some men would experience these impacts. Findings indicated similarity across genders both in the prevalence of frequent aggression and in its association with antisocial behavior. Furthermore, such aggression was likely to be bidirectional in couples. Contrary to the hypothesis of the study, rates of injury and fear for the women were not significantly higher than for the men.
This study examined the links between children's perceptions of the manner in which they and their parents adjust their relationships during early adolescence and early adolescents' orientation toward parents and peers. A sample of 1,771 children completed self-report questionnaires during the spring of their 6th and 7th grades. As predicted, early adolescents who believed their parents asserted and did not relax their power and restrictiveness were higher in an extreme form of peer orientation. Also as predicted, those who perceived few opportunities to be involved in decision making, as well as no increase in these opportunities, were higher in both extreme peer orientation and peer advice seeking. Discussion focuses on the importance for parent-child relationships to adjust to early adolescents' changing developmental needs, as well as the implications of early adolescent peer orientation for later development.