Content uploaded by Adeyemi Ojutalayo Adeeyo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Adeyemi Ojutalayo Adeeyo on Mar 26, 2021
Content may be subject to copyright.
Content uploaded by Eliajh Adebayo
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Eliajh Adebayo on Jan 22, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
*Corresponding author: . E-Mail: firstrebby@gmail.com
JASEM ISSN 1119-8362
All rights reserved
J A S E M .
OURNAL OF PPLIED CIENCE AND NVIRONMENTAL ANAGEMENT
J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. December, 2014
Vol. 18 (4) 669 - 674
Full-text Available Online at
www.ajol.info and
www.bioline.org.br/ja
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on
Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1 I.O, OMOMOWO1
1 Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, P.M.B. 4000, Ogbomoso, Nigeria
eaadebayo@lautech.edu.ng; firstrebby@gmail.com, lizdeley@yahoo.com and olaiyabo@yahoo.com
*Corresponding author: A.O ADEEYO. E-Mail: firstrebby@gmail.com
ABSTRACT: We aimed to investigate the effects of radiofrequency radiation from
telecommunication on bacteria diversity and antibiotic sensitivity of surrounding bacteria
micro-flora. In all cases of bacteria isolated, results indicated that radiation majorly influences
and selected bacteria of specific morphology (rod-like, gram positive and spore formers)
belonging to the genera Bacillus, Clostridium, Corynebacterium and Sporosarcina. Spore
formation have been associated with prevention of DNA damage, this suggest that radiation
may imposes stress detrimental to various non-spore forming, gram negative bacteria of non-
rod morphology. The antibiotic resistance pattern indicated resistance above 50% in three of
the ten common antibiotics tested with the highest of 96% recorded against zinnacef, followed
by amoxicillin (70%) and ampiclox (56%). The highest resistance recorded was attributed to
Bacillus spp while lowest resistance was recorded in Corynebacterium. The two largest
groups of isolates; Bacillus and Clostridium have been reported as human pathogens and
found to be multidrug resistant. © JASEM
http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v18i4.16
Introduction:
Before the 1990’s radiofrequencies were mainly from
a few radio and television transmitters, located in
remote areas and/or very high places. Since the
introduction of wireless telecommunication in the
1990’s the rollout of phone networks has caused a
massive increase in electromagnetic pollution in
cities and the countryside (Firstenberg, 1997; Galeev,
2000). Multiple sources of mobile communication
result in chronic exposure of a significant part of life
(and man) to microwaves at non-thermal levels
(Belyaev, 2005). In recent years, life has been
chronically exposed to microwaves and RFR
(Radiofrequency radiation) signals from various
sources, including Global system for mobile
communication (GSM) and UMTS/3G wireless
phones and base stations, Wireless Local Area
Networks (WLAN), Wireless Personal Area
Networks such as Bluetooth (WPAN), and DECT
(Digital Enhanced (former European) Cordless
Telecommunications) that are erected
indiscriminately without studies of environmental
impact assessments.
The effects of RFR on the biological functions of
living organisms represent an emerging area of
interest with respect to environmental influences on
human health. In latest years, several studies have
been performed to verify direct effects exerted by
such radiations on cell functions. Although results
have been somewhat controversial, a variety of cell
responses have been observed involving proliferation
and differentiation (Huang et al., 2006; Lisi et al.,
2006; Lisi et al., 2008; Vianale et al., 2008; Schwartz
et al., 2008; Foleti et al., 2009), gene expression
(Piacentini et al., 2008; Goodman et al., 2009),
modulation of the membrane receptors functionality
(Jia et al., 2007; Ke at al., 2008; De-Mattei et al.,
2009), apoptosis, alteration in ion homeostasis
(Grassi et al., 2004; Lisi et al., 2006; Iorio et al.,
2011 ), and free radicals generation (Simk, 2007; Di-
Loreto et al., 2009). Bacteria have also been used in
the studies with radiofrequency radiation (Straˇs´ak,
et al., 2005; Fojt et al., 2004; Babushkina et al.,
2005; Justo et al., 2006; Gaafar et al., 2006; Cellini et
al., 2008; Gaafar et al., 2008; Fojt., 2009; Belyaev,
2011; Inhan-Garip et al., 2011, Giorgi et al., 2011).
In particular, it has been demonstrated that radiation
can negatively (Straˇs´ak, et al., 2005; Fojt et al.,
2004; Justo et al., 2006) or positively (Gaafar et al.,
2006; Cellini et al., 2008; Belyaev, 2011) affect
functional parameters (cell growth and viability) and
bacteria antibiotic sensitivity depending on physical
parameters of the electromagnetic field (frequency
and magnetic flux density) applied, the time of the
exposure, and/or the type of bacteria cells used. The
possibility of an effect evoked by RFR on bacterial
distribution and antibiotic resistance deserves special
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance 670
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1; I.O, OMOMOWO1
attention in light of the risk that antimicrobial
resistance poses to public health. Bacteria are
becoming increasingly resistant to almost all
presently available antibiotics and this aspect is
becoming a worldwide problem of highest
significance (Levi, 2001; Bush et al., 2011).
According to these considerations, the study of
effects of RFR on bacteria is essential not only for
investigation of environmental stress influences on
biological systems, but also to explore the antibiotic
resistance pattern associated for possibility of
controlling bacteria in the environment or in clinical
laboratories. We have therefore attempted to
investigate the possible influence of RFR on bacteria
distribution and antibiotic resistance on surrounding
bacteria micro-flora of telecommunication base
stations located around Ladoke Akintola University
of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection: Soil samples were collected from
telecommunication base station located around
Ladoke Akintola University of Technology,
Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria. These were collected
between 0 and 100ft (0, 10, 40, 70 and 100ft) from
the foot of 3 base stations. Soil samples were
aseptically transferred to the laboratory for microbial
analysis.
Isolation of organisms: 1 g of each soil samples was
weighed into 10 ml of sterile distilled water.
Subsequent transfer of 1 ml into 9 ml of sterile
distilled water was engaged for serial dilution of the
prepared samples followed by plating out on nutrient
agar using pour plate techniques. The cultures were
incubated at 37oC for 24 h from where pure cultures
were prepared based on bacteria morphology using
the streaking out method.
Biochemical characterization and identification of
pure cultures: Pure bacterial cultures were identified
on the basis of grams reaction, morphology and
biochemical reactions including sugar hydrolysis,
catalase, oxidase, urease, indole, citrate utilization,
methyl red, nitrate reduction and voges proskaeur
tests. The organisms isolated were then characterized
according to the taxonomic scheme of Buchanan and
Gibbons (1974).
Antibiotic susceptibility tests: Susceptibility of
purified bacterial cultures to a set of ten antimicrobial
substances was assessed by disk diffusion on
Mueller-Hinton agar plates according to the Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI,
2007). After incubation, for 24 h at 37oC, the sizes of
zones of inhibitions were measured and interpreted
by comparing with the standard antibiotic sensitivity
chart to determine their resistant patterns. Resistance
was calculated according to the method of Adebayo
et al. (2012).
Antimicrobial agents: Antibiotics used include
Pefloxacin (PEF), Gentamycin (CN), Ampiclox
(APX), Zinnacef (Z), Amoxicillin (AM), Rocephin
(R), Ciprofloxacin (CPX), Streptomycin (S), Septrin
(SXT), and Erythromycin (E) and were purchased
through Labtrade Chemicals, Nigeria.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:
The result of microbial diversity and prevalence
around telecommunication base stations studied is
indicated in Table 1. A total of 27 bacteria isolates
belonging to four genera were identified. Result show
a high occurrence of Bacillus spp (78 %), followed
by Clostridium spp (11 %), Corynebacterium
striatum (7 %) and Sporosarcina ureae (4 %) with
the lowest distribution. Result indicated that RFR
majorly influences and selected bacteria of specific
morphology (rod-like, gram positive and spore
formers) around the three telecommunication base
stations sampled. Radiation effect seems to favour
majorly the growth of Bacillus spp between the
distance of 0 and 100ft with occasional presence of
Corynebacterium striatum, Sporosarcina ureae and
Clostridium tertium at 10, and 70ft from the base
station. Spore formation has been associated with
prevention of DNA damage and this suggests that
radiation may impose stress detrimental to various
non-spore forming, gram negative bacteria of non-rod
shape. The presence of limited genera which are
mostly spore formers showed that these groups
survived because of their ability to form spores which
protected them from the negative effect of radiation
while others are probably eliminated. Rifat et al.
(2010) reported Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium,
Azorhizobium, Allorhizobium, Sinorhizobium,
Mesorhizobium, Azospirillum, Enterobacter,
Klebsiella, and Pseudomonas spp as symbiotic and
free living beneficial groups of bacteria commonly
encountered in the soil and have potential to
contribute to sustainable plant growth. However none
of these were isolated. The depletion of such nitrogen
fixing bacteria will likely lead to soil infertility as
such organism cannot protect themselves from the
effect of radiation. This may invariably lead to
reduction in yield and productivity of food crops in
such environment. Previous report have implicated
the ability of radiation to induce changes of cell
growth and antibiotic sensitivity in bacteria strains
(Grossman et al., 1992; Stansell et al., 2001;
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance 671
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1; I.O, OMOMOWO1
Table 1: Diversity and prevalence of bacteria isolates from Telecommunication
base stations in LAUTECH.
Isolates
Prevalence
Gram reaction
Shape
Spore formation
Bacillus spp
21 (78 %)
Positive
Rods
Spore formers
Clostridium spp
3 (11 %)
Positive
Rods
Spore formers
Corynebacterium striatum
2 (7 %)
Positive
Rods
Non-Spore
formers
Sporosarcina ureae
1 (3 %)
Positive
cocci
Spore formers
Fojt et al., 2004; Justo et al., 2006; Fojt et al., 2007;
Fojt et al., 2009). It has been found that viability of
different types of bacteria (Escherichia coli,
Leclercia adecarboxylata, and Staphylococcus
aureus) was affected after exposure to an RFR (Fojt
et al., 2004). RFR have been reported to be lethal in
Paracoccus denitrificans, but without changes in
denitrification activity (Fojt et al., 2009). While RFR
as reported in this work is attributed to influencing
the presence of majorly rod-shaped bacteria, Fojt et
al. (2008) do not observe any change in bacterial
morphology after short period of exposure to RFR
suggesting that the radiation selected and caused
survival of bacteria with specific shape and adaptive
feature in the environment rather than causing a
shape change in such organism. On the contrary, it
has been demonstrated that short-term exposure RFR
with a sinusoidal waveform of amplitude ranging
from 0.1 to 1mT and frequency of 50 Hz affected
morphology of cultured E. coli ATCC 700926
(Cellini et al., 2008).
The antibiotic resistant patterns of various bacteria
isolated are indicated In Table 2 and Figure 1.
Antibiotic resistance among the radiofrequency
radiation resistant bacteria indicated that resistance
was above 50% in three of the ten common
antibiotics tested. Among the twenty seven isolates,
26 (96%) were resistant to zinnacef, 19 (70%) to
amoxicillin, 15 (56%) to ampiclox, 5 (19%) to
pefloxacin and gentamycin respectively, 3 (11%) to
erythromycin, 2 (7%) to rocephin and septrin and 1
(4%) to streptomycin and ciprofloxacin. With respect
to the ten antibiotics used, Bacillus spp has resistance
to all (100%) antibiotics used, Clostridium spp was
resistant to four (40 %) while Corynebacterium
striatum and Sporosarcina ureae were resistant to
two (20% resistant) each, among the ten antibiotic
used. Highest resistance was recorded in Bacillus spp
while lowest resistance was recorded in
Corynebacterium. The two largest groups of isolates
of Bacillus and Clostridium have been reported as
human pathogens and found to be multidrug resistant
(Conner-kerr et al., 1998). Bacillus circulans and
Clostridium septicum have been
Table 2: Antibiotic resistant pattern in radiofrequency radiation resistant bacteria Isolated from LAUTECH.
Isolates
Antibiotics with proportion and percentage bacteria resistance
Number
PEF
CN
APX
Z
AM
R
CPX
S
SXT
E
Bacillus spp
21
5
4
11
20
16
2
1
1
2
3
Clostridium spp
3
0
1
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
Corynebacterium
striatum
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Sporosarcina ureae
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Total
27
5(19%)
5(19%)
15(56%)
26(96%)
19(70%)
2(7%)
1(4%)
1(4%)
2(7%)
3(11%)
Pefloxacin (PEF), Gentamycin (CN), Ampiclox (APX), Zinnacef (Z), Amoxicillin (AM), Rocephin (R),
Ciprofloxacin (CPX), Streptomycin (S), Septrin (SXT), and Erythromycin (E)
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance 672
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1; I.O, OMOMOWO1
Fig 1: Percentage resistance to antibiotics among bacteria strains isolated
Pefloxacin (PEF), Gentamycin (CN), Ampiclox (APX), Zinnacef (Z), Amoxicillin (AM), Rocephin (R),
Ciprofloxacin (CPX), Streptomycin (S), Septrin (SXT), and Erythromycin (E)
associated with gas gangrene which is highly fatal
and may result into death in less than 24 h (Katlic,
1980). Clostridium septicum is highly pathogenic in
immune-compromised individuals, Corynebacterium
striatum have been implicated in endocarditis,
bacteremia and catheter infections (Coyle et al.,
1990). Bacillus cereus causes food poisoning,
diarrhea, severe nausea and vomiting (McKillip,
2000). Bacillus circulans is a pathogen incriminated
in human infection such as septicemia, mixed
abscesses and wound infection. Antibiotic resistance
increases in the environment as they replicate their
genetic materials; this means that resistance can
spread from one species of bacteria to the other
enabling it to develop multiple resistances to different
classes of antibiotics. Electromagnetic fields have
been reported in acquisition of resistance to
Cephalosporins (Cefuroxime and Ceftazidime) (Fojt
et al., 2007; Cellini et al., 2008). Justo et al. (2006)
reported that cell growth could be altered (stimulated
or inhibited) under magnetic field effects. Exposure
of bacteria to radiation have been reported to cause
changes in the growth characteristic, morphology,
structural properties of proteins, and the sensitivity
and resistance to certain antibiotics such as
amoxicillin, nalidixic acid, and erythromycin (Gaafar
et al., 2006; Gaafar et al., 2008). These results were
in agreement with the work of Stansell et al. (2001)
who found that moderate intensity static fields were
able affect antibiotic sensitivity and resistance of
bacteria. Furthermore, Belyaev (2011) showed that
RFR, under specific conditions of exposure
(frequency ranging from 8.5Hz to 9 Hz; 0.021mT),
acted as a nontoxic but cell-growth stimulating agent
on E. coli GE499. Again, the exposure of E. coli HB-
101 to radiation produced a stimulation of cell
growth (Babushkina et al., 2005). By contrast,
Grosman et al. (1992) found that static magnetic
fields ranging from 0.5 to 4.0 T had no significant
influence on the growth rate and antibiotic sensitivity
of E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. A direct
comparison of these studies with results obtained in
this work may be difficult because of the dissimilar
experimental procedures employed. It is well known
that the effects of radiation generally depend on both
physical and biological parameters, including field
signal characteristics (frequency, amplitude, wave
shape, etc.), duration of exposure, cell metabolic
state, genotype, and how long cells are allowed to
grow before, during, and after exposure.
This work which aimed to investigate the effects of
Radiofrequency radiation from telecommunication
base stations on bacteria diversity and antibiotic
resistance of surrounding bacteria micro-flora have
shown that radiation influences and selected bacteria
of specific morphology (rod-like and gram positive),
imposes stress detrimental to various non-spore
forming, gram negative bacteria of non-rod
morphology and possibly may contribute to antibiotic
resistance. Further research in this area is advised
with the possibility of development of necessary
hazard control measures for the protection of the
environment from outbreak of antibiotic resistant
organisms.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
PEF
CN
APX
Z
AM
R
CPX
S
SXT
E
PERCENTAGE RESISTANCE
ANTIBIOTICS TESTED
Bacillus spp
Clostridium spp
Corynebacterium
striatum
Sporosarcina ureae
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance 673
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1; I.O, OMOMOWO1
REFERENCES
Adebayo E A; Majolagbe O N; Ola I O and
Ogundiran M A (2012). Antibiotic resistance
pattern of isolated bacteria from salads. Journal
of Research in Biology. 2: 136-142.
Babushkina I V; Borodulin V B; Shmetkova N A
(2005).The influence of alternating magnetic
field on Escherichia coli bacterial cells.
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal. 39: 398–
400.
Belyaev I (2005). Non-thermal biological effects of
microwaves. Microw. Rev. 11: 13–29
Belyaev I (2011). Toxicity and SOS-response to ELF
magnetic fields and nalidixic acid in E. coli cells.
Mutation Research. 722: 56–61.
Buchanan R E and Gibbons N E (1974). Bergeys
Manual of Determinative Microbiology, 8th
edition. The Williams and Wilkins Co,
Baltimore, Md.
Bush K; Courvalin P; Dantas G (2011).Tackling
antibiotic resistance. Nature Reviews
Microbiology. 9:894–896.
Cellini L; Grande R; Di-Campli E (2008). Bacterial
response to the exposure of 50Hz
electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 29:
302–311.
CLSI (2007). Performance Standard for
Antimicrobial Susceptibilty Testing: 17th
informational supplement , M100-S17; 27(1),
Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute,
Wayne, Pa, USA.
Conner-Kerr T A, Sullivan P K, Gaillard J and Jones
R M (1998) The effects of ultraviolet radiation
on antibiotic resistant bacteria In Vitro.
Ostomy/Wound Management. 44:50-56
Coyle M B and Lipsky B A (1990). Coryneform
bacteria in infectious diseases: clinical and
laboratory aspects. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 3: 227-
246
De-mattei M; Varani K; Masieri F F (2009).
Adenosine analogs and electromagnetic fields
inhibit prostaglandin E2 release in bovine
synovial fibroblasts. Osteoarthritis and
Cartilage. 17: 252–262.
Di-Loreto S; Falone S; Caracciolo V (2009). Fifty
hertz extremely low-frequency magnetic field
exposure elicits redox and trophic response in
rat-cortical neurons. Journal of Cellular
Physiology. 219:334–343.
Firstenberg A (1997). Microwaving Our Planet: The
Environmental Impact of the Wireless
Revolution, Cellular Phone Taskforce, Brooklyn,
NY.
Fojt L; Klapetek P; Straˇs´ak L and Vetterl V (2009).
50Hz magnetic field effect on the morphology of
bacteria. Micron. 40: 918–922.
Fojt L; Straˇs´ak L; Vetterl V and ˇSmarda J (2004).
Comparison of the low-frequency magnetic field
effects on bacteria Escherichia coli, Leclercia
adecarboxylata and Staphylococcus aureus.
Bioelectrochemistry. 63: 337–341.
Foletti A; Lisi A; Ledda M; De-Carlo F and Grimaldi
S (2009). Cellular ELF signals as a possible tool
in informative medicine. Electromagnetic
Biology and Medicine. 28;71–79.
Gaafar E S A; Hanafy M S; Tohamy E T and
Ibrahim M H (2006). Stimulation and control of
E. coli by using an extremely low frequency
magnetic field, Romanian Journal of Biophysics.
16: 283–296.
Gaafar E S A; Hanafy M S; Tohamy E T and
Ibrahim M H (2008). The effect of
electromagnetic field on protein molecular
structure of E. coli and its pathogenesis.
Romanian Journal of Biophysics. 18:145–169,
Galeev A L (2000). The effects of microwave
radiation from mobile telephones on humans and
animals, Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 30: 187–194
Giorgi G; Marcantonio P; Bersani F; Gavoci E; and
Del-Re B (2011). Effect of extremely low
frequency magnetic field exposure on DNA
transposition in relation to frequency, wave
shape and exposure time. International Journal
of Radiation Biology. 87: 601–608.
Goodman R; Lin-Ye A; Geddis M S (2009).
Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields
activate the ERK cascade, increase hsp70 protein
levels and promote regeneration in Planaria.
International Journal of Radiation Biology. 85:
851–859.
Effect of Radiofrequency Radiation from Telecommunication Base Stations on Microbial Diversity and Antibiotic Resistance 674
E.A, ADEBAYO1; A.O, ADEEYO*1; A.A, AYANDELE1; I.O, OMOMOWO1
Grassi C; D’Ascenzo M; Torsello A (2004). Effects
of 50 Hz electromagnetic fields on voltage-gated
Ca2+ channels and their role in modulation of
neuroendocrine cell proliferation and death. Cell
Calcium. 35: 307–315.
Huang L; Dong L; Chen Y; Qi H and Xiao D (2006).
Effects of sinusoidal magnetic field observed on
cell proliferation, ion concentration, and
osmolarity in two human cancer cell lines.
Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 25: 113–
126.
Rifat H; Safdar A; Ummay A and Rabia K; Iftikhar
A (2010). Soil beneficial bacteria and their role
in plant growth promotion: a review. Ann
Microbiol. DOI 10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1
Inhan-Garip A; Aksu B; Akan Z; Akakin D; Ozaydin
A N and San T (2011). Effect of extremely low
frequency electromagnetic fields on growth rate
and morphology of bacteria. International
Journal of Radiation Biology. 87:1155–1161.
Iorio R; Delle-Monache S; Bennato F (2011).
Involvement of mitochondrial activity in
mediating ELF-EMF stimulatory effect on
human sperm motility. Bioelectromagnetics. 32:
15–27.
Jia F; Ushiyama A; Masuda H; Lawlor G F and
Ohkubo C (2007). Role of blood flow on RF
exposure induced skin temperature elevations in
rabbit ears. Bioelectromagnetics. 28:163–172.
Justo O R; Perez V H; Alvarez D C and Alegre R M
(2006). Growth of Escherichia coli under
extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields.
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 134:
55–163.
Katlic M R; Derkac W M and Coleman W S (1980).
Clostridium septicum infection and Malignancy.
Ann. Surg. 193: 362-364
Ke X Q; Sun W J; Lu D Q; Fu Y T and Chiang H
(2008). 50Hz magnetic field induces EGF-
receptor clustering and activates RAS.
International Journal of Radiation Biology. 84:
413–420.Levy S B (2001). Antibiotic resistance:
nsequences of inaction. Clinical Infectious
Diseases.33:124–129
Lisi A; Ledda M; De-Carlo F (2008). Calcium ion
cyclotron resonance (ICR) transfers information
to living systems: effects on human epithelial
cell differentiation. Electromagnetic Biology and
Medicine. 27: 230–240.
Lisi A; Ledda M; Rosola E (2006). Extremely low
frequency electromagnetic field exposure
promotes differentiation of pituitary
corticotrope-derived AtT20 D16V cells.
Bioelectromagnetics. 27: 641–651.
McKillip J L (2000). Prevalence and expression of
enterotoxins in Bacillus cereus and other
Bacillus species: a literature review. Antonie Van
Leeuwenhoek. 77: 393-399
Piacentini R; Ripoli C; Mezzogori D; Azzena G B
and Grassi C (2008). Extremely low-frequency
electromagnetic fields promote in vitro
neurogenesis via upregulation of Cav1- channel
activity. Journal of Cellular Physiology.
215:129–139.
Schwartz Z; Simon B J; Duran M A; Barabino G;
Chaudhri R and Boyan B D (2008). Pulsed
electromagnetic fields enhance BMP-2
dependent osteoblastic differentiation of human
mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of
Orthopaedic Research. 26: 1250–1255.
Simk´M (2007). Cell type specific redox status is
responsible for diverse electromagnetic field
effects. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 14:1141–
1152.
Straˇs´ak L; Vetterl V and Smarda J (2002). Effects
of low-frequency magnetic fields on bacteria
Escherichia coli. Bioelectrochemistry. 55: 161–
164.
Vianale G; Reale M; Amerio P; Stefanachi M; Di-
Luzio S and Muraro R (2008). Extremely low
frequency electromagnetic field enhances human
keratinocyte cell growth and decreases
proinflammatory chemokine production. British
Journal of Dermatology. 158:1189–1196.