BookPDF Available

Sustainable Business Development: Frameworks for Idea Evaluation and Cases of Realized Ideas Realized Ideas

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

This book is about developing sustainable businesses. The focus is on early stages – when a business is little more than an idea – and on innovation in an open environment, relatively unconstrained by organizational or other demands. Our setting is primarily the university, and especially the side of the university that nurtures new ideas to grow – sometimes into ventures, and sometimes into projects, but always with the intention of making an impact upon sustainable development – economic, ecological, and social development. All sustainable development starts with an idea of wanting to make a difference. If this difference can be packaged into an offering that some customer pays for, then suddenly the idea is utilizing a whole market economy to make this difference. However, ideas not targeting paying customers normally also have to be packaged in ways that satisfy user or customer needs. Sustainable business development thus can be seen as a way of making the world a better place, not primarily by top-down intervention – through government agencies or programs – but through a more bottom-up process of trying to satisfy human and other needs, by promoting and offering new utilities: customer utilities, societal utilities and business utility (i.e. creating reasons for others to invest money in your idea). Whether you are a practitioner, a student or a university employee, or engaging in your free time (i.e. being an engaged citizen) does not really matter. This book is written for anyone who believes in the power of the individual developing good ideas in networks, and who wishes to learn more about how to realize these ideas. The focus is on you – the idea developer, or if you like, the knowledge worker in the knowledge-economy – not on established firms, organizations, or financiers. After all, ideas especially in early stages depend upon the active engagement of individuals, regardless of where they are situated. If you are an employee, you might have larger initial resources to access but you would also have the duties and constraints of your organization to relate to. If you are acting in your free time, then you might not have the resources but you certainly have freedom to operate and to mobilize relevant networks. Most ideas depend upon a combination of individuals – some being more free but resource-constrained, and others representing structures and then also other levels of resources. This book is written to allow such an individual network-based open innovation perspective to flourish, pointing at opportunities, at useful tools and examples, and at the teamwork often necessary to release creative and accomplishing powers of the main resources of the new knowledge economy – ourselves and our nowadays global networks! We expect the reader of this book to be a reflective doer, someone who learns while doing, and who likes to be inspired by others. The majority of the examples in the book are written by the doers themselves. As editors we have asked the authors to add reflections, and then we have also added some reflections of our own in the final chapter. We believe that good real-life examples have a never-ending ability to allow improved reflections and learning. We encourage you as a reader to discuss and debate issues and examples in this book. We will aspire to develop this version of the book into new versions and perhaps complement it with even more interactive means of communication – such as a website. We hope you share the ambitions we have about increasing knowledge and skills for sustainable business development. Please therefore give your constructive comments for us to improve any content. The first part of the book focuses on frameworks and the second part on cases. We have tried to refer to the cases when appropriate as we introduce frameworks. The frameworks address sustainability, the challenges of so-called lock-ins, how to conduct early idea evaluation and development, utilizing group dynamics, and methods such as backcasting, scenario planning, LCA and patent analysis. The cases cover sustainable business development ventures, social entrepreneurship projects, and sustainable development and idea developments in established firm settings. The 2014 edition of the book is nearly identical to the 2013 edition with the exception of Chapter 2: Sustainability, which has been updated to include the 2013 and 2014 Fifth Assessment reports from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and a note on the 2013 UN Climate Change Conference in Warsaw 11-23 November 2013.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... In particular, the Protocol builds on knowledge co-development (Hegger et al., 2012;Bremer & Meisch, 2017;Bremer et al., 2019), design thinking (Brown, 2008), and participatory visioning and backcasting (e.g. Quist et al., 2007;Alänge & Holmberg, 2014;Wiek & Iwaniec, 2014;Brunner et al., 2016;Van Bers et al., 2016; Van den Ende et al., 2020). ...
... The 'Things we can't control' can be used as boundary conditions, where relevant. The scenario work can be a form of 'backcasting'(Quist, 2007;Alänge & Holmberg, 2014;Brunner et al., 2016;Van Bers et al., 2016) or method inspired on that approach. In the visioning stage, participants may have made (very likely did make) the visions concrete by describing them as concrete options. ...
Technical Report
Full-text available
We developed, tested and refined a novel incremental participatory scenario approach. This method allows for the development of normative scenarios, pathways that lead to desirable futures, with local communities, through a non-linear approach. Developments in the real world rarely follow straightforward linear paths. The approach inventories ‘hinge points’: critical moments in time where things might lead to a better or worse future. The hinge points facilitate the inventory of critical challenges and ambitions relevant to the local situation: climate-related as well as key socio-economic, legal, policy/political, and technological ones. They also allow for exploration of key needs for information or climate services that might be useful to local actors at a given point in time. The method was ground-tested and refined in five case studies in the Netherlands, Norway, France, and Germany. The cases showed that the new approach could be applied and tailored successfully in a variety of situations. Goal/Purpose of the document - Document the novel participatory incremental scenario approach developed by the CoCliServ project. - Detail how locally embedded visions, scenarios, hinge points, and climate information needs can be derived, together with local communities. - Provide guidance and examples to others who might want to use this incremental scenario approach.
... 4. Mandatory presentations and oppositions of final idea evaluation reports, including submitting a written seven-page report plus greater or less extensive appendices for grading. 5. Grading based upon individual exam (60%) and grading of the idea evaluations done in teams (40%) 6. From 2010, the course has had the anthology Sustainable Business Development (see the more recent version, Alänge and Lundqvist, 2014), written by faculty and alumni around the entrepreneurship program as the main literature. ...
... In essence, all students attending the course gain entrepreneurial experiences in terms of having to effectuate under uncertainty and develop skills in how to package early-stage technical ideas in ways more attractive to existing (the idea provider) as well as new and potential stakeholders. They also gain skills in taking entrepreneurial action as well as express and perhaps develop attitudes towards how they want to contribute to sustainable development through early-stage idea evaluation, while relating to project experiences as well as to an anthology with frameworks and perspective offered faculty and alumni entrepreneurs (Alänge and Lundqvist, 2014). ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Questions we care about: This paper asks the following question "How entrepreneurial is it to connect students to technology transfer?". The answer is non-obvious in at least two ways. Firstly, university technology transfer is mostly assumed to be about research, patents, licensing and occasional academic entrepreneurs starting ventures, but not being a space for students to make entrepreneurial impact. Secondly, if students were connected to early technology transfer inventions, what, if any, entrepreneurial learning could that then offer? Approach: The paper investigates a 7,5 HEC, eight-week course running annually since 2008 which connects student teams with early-stage invention disclosures. Under a secrecy agreement, the teams are asked to explore the viability of an idea. The outcomes of this course are investigated in two ways: how ideas have progressed (or not) after the course (indicating entrepreneurial impact), and how students experience learning outcomes (indicating entrepreneurial learning). A case study of one of the ideas transforming into a venture is also offered to help identify ways student-involvement can be entrepreneurial. Results: Over ten years, altogether 211 ideas have been evaluated by the student teams within the course. 27 ideas have progressed into an incubator where idea owners have been matched with student teams. Of these 27 incubated ideas, twelve have become incorporated firms which are all (with one exception) operational to date. These descriptive findings along with the case Swedish Algae Factory indicate in what ways student involvement in technology transfer can be seen as 'being entrepreneurial'. The idea evaluations do not contain typical entrepreneurial learning outcomes, such as business plan writing or testing value propositions on customers (Lean Startup method). Instead, skills are obtained through analyzing technical ideas into multiple directions, exploring future value visions, determining next steps, and organizational dynamics including teamwork and stakeholders (e.g. idea provider). Implications: The findings strongly suggest that we need to revise our view of university technology transfer and what is entrepreneurial or not. Connecting students to technology transfer, makes entrepreneurial sense not only from an impact and progress perspective, but also from an entrepreneurial learning point of view. Value/Originality: This study can help universities revise what is meant by technology transfer and entrepreneurship education and how the two can connect.
... It also philanthropically supported the non-governmental organization that was developing processes for securing organic-cotton certification. IKEA purchased substantial quantities of organic cotton to create a market demand that would facilitate its producers' transformation (Clancy, 2014b). ...
... From 1990 to 2007, competence was developed within specialist areas. In comparison, IKEA shows some activities with an extremely long-term focus, such as developing a functioning organic-cotton market (Clancy, 2014b). It also built in-house sustainability training that was so integrated into the IKEA way that it was no longer known internally among the product developers as sustainability training 24 at the time of our interviews in 2004e2006 (Al€ ange et al., 2007). ...
Article
The aim is to analyse ways that sustainability can be successfully integrated into product development in large firms. This is done by a comparative study of two large firms, IKEA and SCA, during the time period 1990–2006. These were both among the pioneers to introduce sustainability into operations. The study is based on 24 interviews and one author's experience as an insider researcher. The analytical framework visualizes the relationships between what is explicitly expressed, in writing or speech, and what tacitly guides behaviour, and what is actually practised in product development. Although both firms have substantial experience working with sustainability and are role models, they chose very different strategies to integrate sustainability into product development. Their approaches reflect the logic of their company cultures and management systems. This indicates that sustainability practices must be adapted to fit the logic of a firm's existing management system.
... In project management, project managers' competencies are found to be central to their success [24]. Additionally, Gilbert Silvius and Ron Schipper identified that "Project management competence retention (PMCR) is positively connected with the project success rate of an organization" [25]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The current study suggests a different and innovative view by testing a unique combination of variables, which are unproven in a single model for the purpose of increasing the ratio of sustainable projects. The project manager can use the model to look their projects and can compose necessary changes for better outcomes. The study objects to postulate the competence breach of project managers with regard to sustainability, and to deliver direction that how to fulfill the research gap. The given work is centered on the result of project supervisor soft capabilities on project sustainability mediated by innovation. To achieve this aim, deductive approach was adopted. The sample size of the study was 242 respondents, and data were collected from software houses. The collected data were then analyzed by doing the structural equation modeling in PLS-SEM in order to examine the relationships. The outcomes demonstrate positive impact of project manager soft competences on project sustainability and mediating impact of innovation among the relationship of project manager soft competences and project sustainability. Innovation is directly linked to project sustainable development, and was accepted, which aligns with the previous studies. This research reflects the role of project manager soft competences on innovation and project sustainability. The study is unique in its scope and implications as the focus is upon empirical investigation of the project manager soft competences and project sustainability in the context of Pakistan.
... According to Alänge and Lundqvist (2014), exploring Scenarios can also be one of the stages of the proposal to develop sustainable business in innovative and early stages, relatively unrestricted by organizational or other requirements, genuinely predisposed to new configurations. ...
... 4. Mandatory presentations and oppositions of final idea evaluation reports, including submitting a written seven-page report plus greater or less extensive appendices for grading. 5. Grading based upon individual exam (60%) and grading of the idea evaluations done in teams (40%) 6. From 2010, the course has had the anthology Sustainable Business Development (see the more recent version, Alänge and Lundqvist, 2014), written by faculty and alumni around the entrepreneurship program as the main literature. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
This paper investigates students being appointed as surrogate entrepreneurs for early-stage sustainable innovations under the format of an educational course. Entrepreneurship at universities used to be about professors producing inventions that were " taken care of " by technology transfer organizations. However, this approach is not realizing the full potential of a university. Today, therefore, entrepreneurship at universities is more focusing on students and alumni being the main vehicle for impact. While this shift of perspective is promising, this paper wishes to focus attention on students not just developing ideas of their own but actually being appointed to more research-based ideas, as a means of transcending the so-called 'Valley of Death'. Much sustainable innovation arguably gets stuck in this valley. Thus, arranging a course where students engage in early-stage idea development and evaluation makes sense as an approach to cross the valley. The paper examines an early-stage idea development and evaluation course started in 2008, and exemplifies some of the innovative outcomes. The main conclusion of the paper is that such an approach has multiple benefits (learning-and innovation-wise) with relatively limited extra expenses, risks or even opportunity costs. However, from a student perspective, there are concerns of such a course having both traditional and progressive teaching formats. Over the year, many students have expressed concern about one or the other format (either the course being too progressive, uncertain and real-life; or the course being too traditional, requiring readings and lectures). This divergence has made it difficult to obtain high course evaluation scores, even though, as illustrated through student deliverables and examination, new and important knowledge, skills and attitudes have been acquired. The policy implication of the paper is that universities concerned with sustainability should establish similar course models, where students more or less act and learn through being surrogate entrepreneurs for early-stage potentially sustainable innovations.
Book
Full-text available
Possibilities and challenges for the Sustainable University
Chapter
The present study addresses the amount of economic output possible at a given level of energy supply, carbon (greenhouse gas emissions), water use and waste generated recorded in 2014 by the 100 most sustainable corporations in the world. We use an integrated approach that assess how green businesses operate and we analysed the relationship between energy, carbon and water based on the data from the top 100 sustainable companies in the world. We propose two models for the dependence of carbon on energy efficiency and carbon on energy and water efficiency. The results prove the existence of high correlations between the carbon efficiency, water efficiency and energy efficiency. Comparing the models, it results that the water has a smaller influence than the energy on the carbon efficiency.
Chapter
Singapore enjoys a world-class urban transportation system today, benefitting from a combination of long-term planning, continued investment in infrastructure, and readiness in adopting new technologies. However, planners will always need to prepare for uncertain futures, and understand driving forces and global trends that affect future urban mobility. In this paper, we present an ongoing foresight study on Singapore’s urban transport and mobility up to 2030. Our objectives are to develop a shared understanding of the current state of the transportation system, highlight long-term challenges and opportunities, and establish networks between stakeholders. Through environmental scanning and expert interviews, our preliminary findings indicate that mobility-on-demand services, multi-modal transport, and e-commerce are the dominant future drivers of change in the urban mobility landscape. In addition, ageing population, growing population and travel demand, inefficiencies in urban freight, shortage in skilled manpower, and a general resistance to big policy changes are the key challenges facing Singapore urban mobility in future. Finally, in terms of technology, autonomous vehicles, real-time traveller information, and shared mobility are seen as potential game-changers for the future.
Book
Full-text available
This publication series is produced by the Stockholm Environment Institute's PoleStar Project. Named after the star that guided voyagers through uncharted waters, the multi-year PoleStar Project addresses critical aspects of the transition to sustainability. Scenario analysis illuminates long-range problems and possibilities at global, regional, national and local levels. Capacity building strengthens professional capabilities for a new era of development. Policy studies fashion strategies and actions. The PoleStar System © provides a user-friendly tool for organizing pertinent data, formulating scenarios, and evaluating strategies for sustainable development. For more information, visit http://www.seib.org/polestar.html on the Internet. The Global Scenario Group was established to carry forward the global aspects of this work. The PoleStar publication series includes: 1. The Global Scenario Group engages a diverse group of development professionals in a long-term commitment to examining the requirements for sustainability. The GSG is an independent, international and inter-disciplinary body, representing a variety of geographic and professional experiences. Its work program includes global and regional scenario development, policy analysis and public education. The diversity and continuity of the GSG offer a unique resource for the research and policy communities. The GSG pursues its objectives through research, publication and collaboration with regional sustainable development projects. This report relies on the scenario framework developed in Branch Points: Global Scenarios and Human Choice (PoleStar #7) to examine alternative global futures. A companion document (PoleStar #9) provides technical details. For reports and more information, visit http://www.gsg.org on the Internet.
Chapter
This chapter discusses some of the factors by which groups achieve a great process. A great group process is one that is responsive, that includes conflict, and where group members get along. The antecedent conditions that are discussed include sets of tactics around building collective intuition, stimulating quick conflict, and setting the pace of the group. It also indicates that the leader has a particularly powerful influence on the process of the group. Using research on groups, this chapter highlights some of the key ways to understand and improve group process. Although the membership of groups enables and constrains many of their activities, a central element that causes some groups to succeed and others to fail is group process. With a positive group process, a team of average individuals can perform better than a group of superstars with a bad group process.
Chapter
The basic principle outlined in this chapter is that intra-team conflict can be managed using collaboration. Intra-team conflict occurs when team members hold discrepant views or have interpersonal incompatibilities. There has been a debate in organizational research regarding whether agreement or disagreement within teams is advantageous for overall performance. Managing task conflict via collaboration can improve the quality of team decision making and performance. Collaboration is fostered when there is a strong team orientation, team members are both cooperatively and epistemically motivated, and team members engage in problem-solving behaviors. Collaboration provides a way to focus more objectively on the task at hand and integrate conflicting perspectives. It is a joint endeavor, involving two or more people working together to complete a task. Collaboration includes teamwork – the coordination of efforts of a group of people around a stated purpose.