... B. LIVERS ET AL. Time consuming to determine WV; not possible for some field situations Manners et al., 2007;Sanhueza et al., 2019;Thevenet et al., 1998 Livers and Wohl, 2016;Manners et al., 2007;Ravazzolo et al., 2015;Sanhueza et al., 2019;Thevenet et al., 1998 Complete box JV completely encloses all wood, organic matter, and void space; 0.9 porosity used to convert air-wood space (JV) to WV with Equation 1 or Equation 2; Figure 1(B) A 0.9 porosity specific to Thevenet et al., 1998; calibration curves needed to account for variability in LW density and jam types across regions or depositional processes Boivin et al., 2015;Thevenet et al., 1998 Best-fit box JV defined by a box, prism, or other simple geometric shape that best fits the jam but may not totally enclose all jam materials; convert to WV; a Figure 1(C) JV is subjective; pieces extending outside best-fit box must be accounted for appropriately to obtain total WV Dixon, 2016;Livers and Wohl, 2016;Scott and Wohl, 2018 Aerial extent aerial extent of jam measured in situ or using aerial imagery, multiplied by average estimate of jam thickness (JV); convert to WV; a Figure 1(E) Field estimation of jam thickness and porosity needed, cannot be completed remotely Boivin et al., 2015, Kramer andWohl, 2015;Ventres-Pake et al., 2019 3D modeling 3D outer geometry of jam (JV) generated from field surveys (e.g. prism and rod surveys with total stations or laser rangefinders, LiDAR, hand held cameras, structure from motion, unmanned aerial vehicles); convert to WV; a Figure 1(D) Equipment required can be more expensive than traditional field methods; field estimation o porosity needed; post-processing can be time consuming Sanhueza et al., 2019;Spreitzer et al., 2019 Note: WV, wood volume; JV, jam volume; LW, large wood (>10cm diameter and 1m length). ...