Purpose
The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to assess how concerned Norwegians are about fish welfare; (2) to investigate Norwegians’ willingness to pay for salmon filet made from welfare-assured farmed fish with high levels of welfare; and (3) to examine Norwegian opinions about the appropriate way to pay for better welfare standards in fish production.
Design/methodology/approach
On the basis of two focus group sessions, a survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to a representative sample of 2147 Norwegian households via e-mail.
Findings
Results showed that the Norwegian public is concerned about fish welfare and is willing to pay a price premium for products made from welfare-assured fish. Norwegian consumers do not, however, want to be the only ones paying for fish welfare, as the main responsibility for fish welfare lies with producers and the Government.
Research limitations/implications
In this study willingness to pay is measured using a hypothetical choice experiment. Values people express as citizens, however, may not accurately predict true consumer behaviour. This is generally referred to as ‘citizen-consumer duality’ and may have affected our results.
Practical implications
The study shows that there is a national market for welfare-assured fish products, but education initiatives focusing on fish farming and fish welfare issues would further influence the attitudes and purchasing habits of Norwegian consumers.
Originality/value
Although concern about animal welfare is growing in the western world, very little attention has been given to the welfare of fish. This article aims to make up for this by presenting a study of how Norwegians view the welfare of farmed salmon.
Figures - uploaded by
Kristian EllingsenAuthor contentAll figure content in this area was uploaded by Kristian Ellingsen
Content may be subject to copyright.