ArticlePDF Available

Who cares about fish welfare? - A Norwegian study

Authors:
  • Statistics Norway (Statistisk sentralbyrå)
  • Aarhus University Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics

Abstract and Figures

Purpose The purpose of this study was threefold: (1) to assess how concerned Norwegians are about fish welfare; (2) to investigate Norwegians’ willingness to pay for salmon filet made from welfare-assured farmed fish with high levels of welfare; and (3) to examine Norwegian opinions about the appropriate way to pay for better welfare standards in fish production. Design/methodology/approach On the basis of two focus group sessions, a survey questionnaire was developed and distributed to a representative sample of 2147 Norwegian households via e-mail. Findings Results showed that the Norwegian public is concerned about fish welfare and is willing to pay a price premium for products made from welfare-assured fish. Norwegian consumers do not, however, want to be the only ones paying for fish welfare, as the main responsibility for fish welfare lies with producers and the Government. Research limitations/implications In this study willingness to pay is measured using a hypothetical choice experiment. Values people express as citizens, however, may not accurately predict true consumer behaviour. This is generally referred to as ‘citizen-consumer duality’ and may have affected our results. Practical implications The study shows that there is a national market for welfare-assured fish products, but education initiatives focusing on fish farming and fish welfare issues would further influence the attitudes and purchasing habits of Norwegian consumers. Originality/value Although concern about animal welfare is growing in the western world, very little attention has been given to the welfare of fish. This article aims to make up for this by presenting a study of how Norwegians view the welfare of farmed salmon.
Content may be subject to copyright.
A preview of the PDF is not available
... Consumers are increasingly aware of issues such as resource depletion and environmental intervention [3][4][5]. Moreover, there are ethical concerns about animal welfare and food security in seafood production, which have led to a strong reduction in the use of antibiotics and other therapeutic drugs in many countries [5][6][7]. Society expects organisms to be farmed responsibly, prioritizing animal well-being and minimizing the industry's environmental impacts [6,[8][9][10]. Accordingly, optimizing fish nutrition presents one of the potential approaches to improve aquaculture environmental performance and ethical treatment of animals, also enhancing consumer trust and confidence in the industry. ...
... Moreover, there are ethical concerns about animal welfare and food security in seafood production, which have led to a strong reduction in the use of antibiotics and other therapeutic drugs in many countries [5][6][7]. Society expects organisms to be farmed responsibly, prioritizing animal well-being and minimizing the industry's environmental impacts [6,[8][9][10]. Accordingly, optimizing fish nutrition presents one of the potential approaches to improve aquaculture environmental performance and ethical treatment of animals, also enhancing consumer trust and confidence in the industry. ...
Article
Full-text available
Society is becoming more demanding with aquaculture’s environmental footprint and animal wellbeing. In order to potentially mitigate these concerns, feed formulations could be based on eco-efficient (circular economy-driven) or organic ingredients. This study aimed to investigate the growth performance, feed utilization, and health status of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) when fed with such feeds. The growth trial lasted for 8 weeks, and fish had an initial weight of 31.0 ± 0.5 g (mean ± SD). Fish were fed until visual satiation, in quadruplicate, with one of three isonitrogenous and isoenergetic experimental feeds: a commercial-like feed without fishmeal (PD), a diet based on ingredients compatible with organic certification (ORG), or a feed formulated using circular economy-driven subproducts and emergent ingredients (ECO). Fish fed ECO showed a tendency for decreased feed intake, while ORG fish significantly reduced their intake compared to those fed PD. Consequently, fish fed ECO (62.7 ± 5.4 g) exhibited almost half the growth than those fed PD (107.8 ± 6.1 g), while ORG fish almost did not increase their weight (32.7 ± 1.3 g). ECO and ORG diets had a lower digestibility for protein, lipid, and energy when compared to PD. Feed utilization of fish fed ECO or ORG was also lower than those fed PD. From the health-related genes analyzed, only glutathione reductase (gsr) showed statistically significant differences, being more expressed in fish-fed ECO than those fed PD. Thus, even when such novel formulations induced extreme effects on voluntary feed intake, their impact was noted only in fish growth, but not in robustness.
... The highest marginal effects for the red snapper appeared among the youngest age group, confirming patterns in studies that show that older segments are less willing to accept aquaculture products [34,[54][55][56][57][58]. Conversely, the results in relation to the snook demonstrate an opposite trend, consistent with findings on aquaculture fish [11,15,45,[59][60][61]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Aquaculture in developing countries, including Mexico, primarily consists of artisanal activities characterized by low-scale production. No studies in these regions has analyzed consumer preferences regarding aquaculture products, specifically for snook and red snapper. Consequently, to explore consumer preferences, the primary objective of this study is to estimate a measure of welfare in the form of willingness to pay (WTP) for fish cultivated under small-scale production conditions in floating cages. To examine the variables impacting WTP, we employed the random utility model (RUM) theoretical framework and a grouping of econometric models belonging to the discrete choice framework. The results strongly suggest that product attributes, such as presentation, purchasing location, consumption-related characteristics, and certain socioeconomic variables, significantly influence the decision to select farmed products. Developing productive aquaculture projects in Mexico and other developing countries can enhance community development by providing producers with accurate information for decision-making and by expanding the fish supply in response to the growing consumer demand. Key Contribution: This study is a pioneering work that explores consumer preferences for snook and red snapper in an artisanal aquaculture environment through a measure of well-being known as the willingness to pay (WTP) for both farmed species from low-scale production in floating cages. This work is relevant because producers working in fisheries and aquaculture in Mexico and developing countries mainly operate low-scale artisanal production systems characterized by low incomes, limited access to market information, restrictions on credit, and difficulties accessing relevant technology. This work can provide precise information that may help identify areas of opportunity and market trends as well as supporting studies on the profitability of farmed fish.
... Norway prioritizes fish health and welfare, implementing comprehensive standards throughout the fish farming continuum to address diseases, parasitic infections, handling, injuries, and mortality during farming and transportation [20][21][22][23]. Conversely, Korean aquaculture has experienced substantial growth over the past three decades [24]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Korean aquaculture has expanded considerably in recent decades; however, this growth has often prioritized quantity over fish welfare. Therefore, we analyzed the aquaculture practices of olive flounder, the predominant species in Korean consumption and production, within the framework of fish welfare. We conducted extensive interviews and surveys across olive flounder farms in Jeju-do and Wando to examine prevalent issues impacting fish welfare in aquaculture. These issues include stressors, mass mortality events, and disease outbreaks, all of which strain the welfare of farmed fish. Moreover, our survey revealed farmers’ varying perceptions of fish welfare, highlighting the necessity for a cohesive approach. Accordingly, we propose recommendations to enhance fish welfare and establish a more sustainable aquaculture model in Korea. Ensuring fish welfare in aquaculture operations requires a comprehensive approach that considers the physiological and behavioral needs of fish throughout the farming lifecycle. By prioritizing fish welfare, Korean aquaculture can strengthen its growth while maintaining ethical standards and ensuring the well-being of farmed fish. This welfare-centric approach is crucial for the long-term sustainability and resilience of the Korean aquaculture industry. By addressing welfare concerns and promoting responsible practices, Korean aquaculture can foster an ethically sound and sustainable future.
Article
Purpose A limited number of studies have aimed at understanding behavior towards animal welfare. However, there are indications that consumers make an important distinction between land animals and fish. As no studies have attempted to explain the factors that influence consumer behavior towards the welfare of fish, this study aims to explain the behavior using the value–belief–norm (VBN) model. In addition, we extend the model by using empathy as a factor influencing the formation of personal norms. This study argues that by adding empathy to the model, we will improve the ability of the VBN to explain moral behavior. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on survey data from 416 Norwegian consumers. A structural equation modeling analysis with latent constructs is used to test the hypotheses. Findings The findings validate the ability of the VBN model to explain consumer intention to buy products containing fish with better welfare. We also showed that empathy and beliefs strongly influence personal norms. The extended VBN model increased the explained variance of personal norm by 11,54%. Consumers with biospheric values are strongly likely to have empathetic feelings towards fish suffering and believe that fish can feel pain. However, consumers with hedonistic values are significantly negatively related to beliefs and empathy. Practical implications By understanding the role of empathy, companies can develop marketing strategies that appeal to consumers' values, empathy and beliefs and ultimately encourage them to make purchases that support fish welfare. Originality/value Practically, this study explores consumers' beliefs towards fish welfare and identifies consumers who are more likely to purchase products containing fish with better welfare based on their values.
Article
As fish welfare becomes a growing concern, it is important to ensure humane treatment during slaughter. This study aimed to assess the onset of unconsciousness in Atlantic halibut immersed in CO2-saturated seawater through electroencephalography (EEG). Of the 29 fish studied, 10 exhibited escape attempts, indicating aversion to CO2-saturated water despite its oxygenation. EEG signals showed four distinct phases: transitional, excitation (high amplitude–high frequency), suppressed, and iso-electric phases. The onset of the suppressed phase, indicative of unconsciousness, occurred on average 258.8 ± 46.2 s after immersion. The spectral analysis of the EEG signals showed a progressive decrease in median frequency, spectral edge frequency, and high frequency contribution, which corresponded to the gradual loss of consciousness. The study concludes that CO2-saturated water is not recommended for pre-slaughter handling of halibut due to the extended time required for the onset of unconsciousness and the observed aversive behaviour. Ensuring humane treatment during slaughter is important for addressing public concern and safeguarding fish welfare in all stages of production.
Article
Full-text available
Simple Summary: The World Organization for Animal Health recommends the use of stunning methods before the slaughter of farmed fish destined for human consumption. The use of carbon dioxide (CO 2) is not recommended by the World Organisation for Animal Health for the stunning of farmed fish at pre-slaughter. However, its use continues to be common in the world. CO 2 stimulates chemoreceptors, causing aversion and escape attempts when fish are immersed in CO 2-saturated water. The use of CO 2 in seawater with oxygenated water is allowed for pre-slaughter of halibut in Norway. Hence, there are no studies assessing loss of consciousness in halibut exposed to this stunning method. The best approach to determine unconsciousness is by measuring brain electrical activity through EEG. Abstract: As fish welfare becomes a growing concern, it is important to ensure humane treatment during slaughter. This study aimed to assess the onset of unconsciousness in Atlantic halibut immersed in CO 2-saturated seawater through electroencephalography (EEG). Of the 29 fish studied, 10 exhibited escape attempts, indicating aversion to CO 2-saturated water despite its oxygenation. EEG signals showed four distinct phases: transitional, excitation (high amplitude-high frequency), suppressed, and iso-electric phases. The onset of the suppressed phase, indicative of unconsciousness, occurred on average 258.8 ± 46.2 s after immersion. The spectral analysis of the EEG signals showed a progressive decrease in median frequency, spectral edge frequency, and high frequency contribution, which corresponded to the gradual loss of consciousness. The study concludes that CO 2-saturated water is not recommended for pre-slaughter handling of halibut due to the extended time required for the onset of unconsciousness and the observed aversive behaviour. Ensuring humane treatment during slaughter is important for addressing public concern and safeguarding fish welfare in all stages of production.
Article
Full-text available
This paper considers the topic of animal welfare - usually associated with ethics and moral values, or with veterinary science and ethology - from the standpoint of economics and social choice. The economic value of farm animals to society is dominated by their productivity in food production, but their welfare can be perceived as having an independent element of value in itself. The paper sets out a simple model of the inherent conflict between animal welfare and livestock productivity - essentially a conflict between the animals' benefit and human benefit. The financial costs of improved animal welfare standards, most appropriately reflected in their effect on final food prices, are relatively insignificant; but placing a financial value on such improvements is problematical. Because animal welfare is evidently a 'public good' there is an obvious role for government policy in establishing and enforcing standards. The issue of how to define appropriate policy objectives in relation to welfare standards, and the various measures for pursuing those objectives, are discussed. Finally, the potential economic inconsistencies of domestic animal welfare policies in a food importing context are pointed out.
Chapter
Full-text available
This chapter addresses two questions; how big is the "gap" between intentions and behavior, and what psychological variables might be able to "bridge" the intention-behavior gap? A meta-analysis of meta-analyses is used to quantify the gap and a conceptual analysis of intention-behavior discrepancies is presented. Research is described on the extent to which four groups of variables-behavior type, intention type, properties of intention, and cognitive and personality variables-moderate intention-behavior relations. Finally, the scope of the intention construct is discussed in the light of recent evidence concerning the role of habits and automaticity in human behavior.
Article
Full-text available
Purpose – Aquaculture is, an important animal farming activity, and fish welfare has recently become an important issue in the EU. Driving forces behind the promotion of fish welfare are demands from retailers and consumers. Given this background, it is the main objective of this paper in a Danish setting to investigate the willingness of consumers to pay for farmed rainbow trout with a quality label certifying good fish welfare. It also aims to describe consumers’ perception and consumption of farmed fish and their beliefs about fish welfare. Design/methodology/approach – A contingent valuation approach was used to evaluate consumers’ willingness to pay for fish welfare, using an open‐ended elicitation technique. To determine the factors that may influence consumers’ willingness to pay for fish welfare the binomial logit model was used. Data were collected from an online survey of Danish consumers in the spring of 2009, sample size 1,000. Findings – Of the sample, 48 percent were on average willing to pay 25 percent extra for welfare rainbow trout. Primarily women with a longer education, belonging to higher income households are willing to pay extra, also older consumers are more willing to pay more than younger consumers. Consumers who emphasize eco‐friendly production of welfare fish, freshness, and animal welfare also tend to be willing to pay extra. Originality/value – While much literature has addressed animal welfare and willingness to pay for it, only a few studies have specifically considered consumers’ perception of fish welfare and their willingness to pay for welfare fish.
Article
Full-text available
Offshore fish farming is predicted to increase in the near future driven by the lack of coastal space. In this review I discuss the environmental issues of offshore farming from experience in coastal farms. Even more so than in coastal farms, a rapid and wide dispersal of dissolved waste prod- ucts is predicted for offshore farms. Despite wider dispersal of particulate waste products, fast sinking rates of feed pellets and faeces suggest organic enrichment of the bottom sediments in farm vicinities (hundreds of meters), although at lower loading rates than coastal farms. The benthic response to organic enrichment is unpredictable due to lack of knowledge from shelf areas. Most shelf sediments are considered carbon limited and fish farm waste products may stimulate the benthic communities, but due to the sparse abundance and absence of pollutant-tolerant benthic fauna, the capacity of ben- thic communities to assimilate organic matter may be limited. Instead, microbial decomposition of waste products could become important, leading to increased oxygen demand and accumulation of sulfides in the sediments. This may negatively affect benthic biodiversity. Interactions with wild fish (aggregation, genetic impacts, spreading of disease and parasites) are expected, but difficult to pre- dict, as the composition of species attracted to offshore farms will be different from that of species attracted to coastal farms. Escapees are potentially a high risk due to farm failure under rough weather conditions in the open sea. The carbon footprint of farming offshore will increase (transportation) and the ecological footprint (fishing feed) will remain a severe constraint, as in coastal farming. Offshore farming is subject to high costs of operation, including those for monitoring environmental conditions. Research should focus on interactions with wild fish populations, mapping of sensitive benthic habitats and experimental studies of the response of benthic habitats to organic enrichments.
Article
Vaccine-induced side effects (adhesions and melanin deposits) were subjectively evaluated in this study for 150 full-sib families of Atlantic salmon from Salmo Breed AS (year-class 2007). There were four experimental fish groups of which three received a commercial six-component vaccine with an injection volume of 0.1 ml per fish. The groups are described as follows: 1) Pre-smolts kept in freshwater at high temperature (17 °C) and evaluated three months after vaccination (FW); 2) Post-smolts evaluated six months after sea transfer (SW6); 3) Post-smolts evaluated 12 months after sea transfer (SW12); 4) Post-smolts that received an experimental vaccine with a reduced injection volume of 0.05 ml per fish and evaluated six months after sea transfer (SW6-RV). Adhesions between intraperitoneal organs and melanin deposits on internal organs were scored. The FW group had the largest adhesion scores (2.06, SD = 0.49) (P < 0.05) but the smallest melanin scores (0.95, SD = 0.44) (P < 0.05). The SW6 group had greater adhesion scores (1.68, SD = 0.65) than the SW12 group (1.46, SD = 0.56) (P < 0.05), but similar melanin scores (1.49 vs. 1.45; P = 0.12). The SW6-RV group had smaller adhesion scores (0.93 vs. 1.68) and melanin scores (1.04 vs. 1.49) (P < 0.05) than the parallel SW6-group. For the fish groups given the commercial vaccine, the heritability estimates for adhesion scores were 0.31 ± 0.05 (FW), 0.19 ± 0.04 (SW6) and 0.16 ± 0.05 (SW12), and for melanin scores 0.27 ± 0.05 (FW), 0.28 ± 0.05 (SW6) and 0.30 ± 0.05 (SW12). For the SW6-RV group the heritabilities were smaller; 0.08 ± 0.03 (SW6-RV) for adhesion score and 0.11 ± 0.03 (SW6-RV) for melanin score. The genetic correlation between adhesion scores and melanin scores within groups was intermediate for the FW group (0.52 ± 0.11) but greater for the SW6 (0.89 ± 0.06) and SW12 groups (0.87 ± 0.06). The genetic correlation between the SW6 and SW12 groups was large for both adhesion (0.89 ± 0.07) and melanin (0.92 ± 0.11) scores. However, the genetic correlations between FW group and the SW6 and SW12 groups were smaller for adhesions (0.62 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.14, respectively) and for melanin (0.84 ± 0.08 and 0.61 ± 0.11, respectively). These results show that vaccine-induced side effects can be reduced through selective breeding, but that a reduction can also be achieved by other factors such as improvement of the vaccine.