Content uploaded by Ornit Spektor-Levy
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Ornit Spektor-Levy on Oct 17, 2017
Content may be subject to copyright.
Available via license: CC BY-NC 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Volume 8, 2012
IJELLO special series of Chais Conference 2012 best papers
Editor: Janice Whatley
An earlier, shorter version of this paper was presented at the Chais conference 2012, in Raanana, Israel,
and included in Y. Eshet-Alkalai, A. Caspi, S. Eden, N. Geri, Y. Yair, & Y. Kalman (Eds.), Proceedings of the
Chais conference on instructional technologies research 2012: Learning in the technological era. Raanana:
The Open University of Israel. http://www.openu.ac.il/research_center/chais2011/papers.html
The Impact of Learning with Laptops in
1:1 Classes on the Development of Learning Skills
and Information Literacy among
Middle School Students
Ornit Spektor-Levy and Yael Granot-Gilat
School of Education, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
ornitsl@gmail.com yaelbambule@gmail.com
Abstract
The goal of this study was to examine the impact of a one-to-one program on the implementation
of learning skills, information literacy, and the usage of computerized tools among students.
These skills are part of the demands placed upon schools to develop 21st century competencies.
Seventh and ninth grade students participated in this study (N=181). One group had routinely
studied in 1:1 classes with personal laptops (Intervention group) and others studied in regular
classes with no ICT (Comparison group). The research tool consisted of a complex, computer-
based learning task. Completion of the task required implementation of skills such as information
retrieval, information evaluation, reading comprehension, information processing and representa-
tion, and knowledge presentation. Findings indicated that students from 1:1 classes performed
significantly better than students from the comparison group. Their higher competencies were
manifested in the final score as well as in skills such as organizing information in a table, evaluat-
ing information and its reliability, quality of argumentation, and representation and presentation
of knowledge while using computerized tools. These results indicate, on the practical level, the
positive effect of learning with personal laptops and routinely available ICT on students'
achievements and competencies.
Keywords: one-to-one classes, 21st century skills, information literacy, ICT.
Introduction
In recent decades new standards have formulated new reforms that reflect the overall goal of pre-
paring students for the requirements of the 21st century knowledge-based society. Nowadays,
educators are required to redefine educational goals and integrate technology into the school cur-
riculum (Swan, Van ’T Hooft,
Kratcoski, & Schenker, 2007).
The integration of technology in schools
has evolved from desk-top computers to
laptops (1:1); from computers used in a
specific lesson to computers used any-
time anywhere (24/7). Despite the many
ways in which computers can be ac-
cessed within schools (e.g., in labs, li-
braries, or on shared carts), teachers and
students still report using computers in
Material published as part of this publication, either on-line or
in print, is copyrighted by the Informing Science Institute.
Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these
works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee
provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit
or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice
in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is per-
missible to abstract these works so long as credit is given. To
copy in all other cases or to republish or to post on a server or
to redistribute to lists requires specific permission and payment
of a fee. Contact Publisher@InformingScience.org to request
redistribution permission.
Impact of Learning with Laptops
school for only a fraction of the time each day (Bebell & Kay, 2009; Bebell, Russell, & O’Dwyer,
2004; Russell, Bebell, O’Dwyer, & O’Connor, 2003). Many observers theorize that the disjunc-
ture between the dramatic increase in the presence of computers in schools and the relatively un-
changing degree of use is due, in part, to the fact that student-to-computer ratios have not yet
reached the stage where the technology is ubiquitous (Bebell & Kay, 2009; Bull, Bull, Garofolo,
& Harris, 2002; Rockman et al., 1998). Yet there is a dramatic increase around the world of ini-
tiatives that provide laptop computers to students and teachers (1:1) aimed at reaching the perva-
siveness of computers in schools.
Despite the growing interest in 1:1 computing, there is a lack of sufficient, sustained, large-scale
research and evaluation that focuses on teaching and learning in these intensive computing envi-
ronments (Bebell & Kay, 2010). Specifically, there is a lack of evidence that connects the use of
technology in these 1:1 settings with measuring student achievement. This is a particularly salient
issue in light of the high cost of implementing and maintaining 1:1 laptop initiatives and the cur-
rent climate of educational policy (Bebell & Kay, 2010). Thus, the aim of the study described
here was to evaluate the impact of learning with laptops in 1:1 classes on the development of
learning skills and information literacy among middle school students.
Integrating Technology in Education
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) produces changes that require the education
system to respond, to cope, and even to change (Fullan, 2001; Salomon, 2000). Adapting the edu-
cation system to the 21st century is a process whose objective leads to the presence of an innova-
tive pedagogy in the schools while employing Information and Communication Technology
(ICT). The transition to a knowledge society compels the education system to innovate and
change at the national and municipal policy-making levels, as well as at the local level, including
the schools and the parents (Mioduser, Nachmias, Forkush, & Tubin, 2003).
In a traditional learning system that does not use modern technology, the teacher has great diffi-
culty addressing all the students in a classroom effectively and in an equal manner (Katz & Offir,
1996). In an ICT environment the personal laptop computer offers unique and powerful abilities
to allow each student to work at his or her own pace, personal mentoring combined with feedback
responses, software that improves learning, and support through peer collaboration (Dunleavy,
Dexter & Heinecke, 2007). In this way a teacher can work in a heterogeneous classroom while
addressing its inherently different levels of students without the need for delaying or slowing
down the pace of the other students.
Education systems around the world have succeeded in understanding that they must prepare for
the 21st century in various ways to bring the learner through the process to becoming a graduate
who is fit for the work and tasks of the century in which we live. Thus, school leavers must adapt
to the constantly changing reality, complex systems that require skills of various kinds, and a
growing requirement for originality, ingenuity, self-discipline and management, as well as prob-
lem solving capabilities.
The Israeli Ministry of Education’s National ICT Program (Ministry of Education, 2012) is aimed
at investing in ICT infrastructure in schools, so as to provide students and teachers with an ad-
vanced and optimal teaching and learning environment. This environment – Smart Classes – is to
include Internet connectivity, laptop computers for the teachers, a ceiling-mounted projector in
the classroom, and a computer-student ratio of 1:5. These learning environments provide tools
that allow more accessibility to contemporary, media-rich, digital content that embraces flexible
teaching and learning processes. Hence, the Ministry of Education understands that it is also es-
sential to invest in the professional development of the educators, so as to promote technology
84
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
integration in routine teaching and learning, and in order to ensure the success of the program
(Ministry of Education, 2012).
Models of ICT in Schools around the World
Various models of learning with computers can be found around the world. ICT models using
small-scale student populations are referred to as Islands of Innovation (Forkosh-Baruch,
Nachmias, Mioduser, & Tubin, 2005). Diversely, some schools have adopted ICT widely, em-
bracing most of the students and teachers at the school, in a model that is referred to as School-
wide Implementation, for example, schools where the entire school population is in possession of
personal laptops, used by the students and teachers to work in the various subject areas (Forkosh-
Baruch et al., 2005). Even among the School-wide Implementation models it is possible to find a
myriad of variations: some use laptops that are stored on carts and transferred between class-
rooms as needed; others, such as 1:1 programs, integrate computers in intensive ways whereby
every student and teacher has a personal laptop, and the classrooms in the school are equipped
with a projector plus a screen, as well as the means for darkening the room. Computer integrated
learning takes place in all the subject areas, and the students and teachers take their personal
computers home with them at the end of the school day and return with them the next day.
Laptops allow the teacher to be a facilitator and to encourage the students to explore and solve
problems on their own by looking for information and collaborating among themselves, leading
to heightened student interpersonal skills and critical thinking as well (Warschauer, 2005-2006,
2008). However, most of the studies have found it difficult to demonstrate changes in student
achievements on knowledge tests and on international standards tests (For example: Shapley et
al., 2009; Silvernail & Buffington, 2009; Weston & Bain, 2010).
Learning Skills, Information Literacy and 21st Century Skills
One of the tasks awaiting the education system in this information-rich age is to educate the
learner to derive the anticipated benefits from the information and to shield against the dangers
inherent in it. Another goal is to educate the learner to acquire learning skills that enable him or
her to locate information, to process it, and present new knowledge (Spektor-Levy, Eylon, &
Scherz, 2009). The field that deals with searching and processing information is called Informa-
tion Science or Information Literacy. Information Literacy is the educated use of information in
order to obtain defined knowledge. It is not the outcome of ICT. However, as a consequence of
ICT, Information Literacy has gained new meaning. A person’s ability to use Information Liter-
acy in order to create and consolidate his or her own required knowledge is as important today, if
not more so, than accumulating edited and ready-made knowledge (Ministry of Education, 2012).
Twenty-first century skills include competencies such as creative thinking; information and
communication literacy (the students will use the technology and the environment in order to
communicate and work in cooperation with others, at a distance, with the aim of advancing their
studies and helping others); interpersonal relations and self-management (interpersonal skills and
cooperative work, independent learning and behavior, flexibility and adaptability, and personal as
well as social responsibility); critical thinking, problem solving, and decision-making (Informa-
tion Literacy or Information Science); technological comprehension; technological concepts and
operation (the use of software, using the Internet, online protection, using communication tech-
nology) (Ministry of Education, 2012; Mueller, 2009)
Development of Competencies in 1:1 Classes
Lei & Zhao (2008) contend that when it comes to the question of what really happens when every
student has a laptop and how the laptops are being used in classrooms, current studies provide
only general information on “what” and “how much” is used, as well as changes in “what” and
85
Impact of Learning with Laptops
“how much,” while there is a dearth of information on “how” the laptops are being used in teach-
ing and learning practices. Due to the expansion of such initiatives in many countries, it is neces-
sary to question the effectiveness of such learning environments (Kozma, 2003; Penuel, 2006), to
characterize the one-to-one learning environments, and to analyze the impact of such environ-
ments on students’ achievements and other variables (Beresford-Hill, 2000).
Early research and evaluation studies suggest several positive outcomes from 1:1 laptop initia-
tives, including increased student engagement (Cromwell, 1999; Maine Education Policy Re-
search Institute (MEPRI), 2003; Rockman et al, 1998), decreased disciplinary problems (Bald-
win, 1999; MEPRI, 2003), increased use of computers for writing, analysis and research (Bald-
win, 1999; Cromwell, 1999; Guignon, 1998; Russell, Bebell, & Higgins, 2004), and a movement
toward student-centered classrooms (Rockman et al, 1998). Baldwin (1999) also documented ef-
fects on student behavior at home, e.g., with more time spent on homework. Gulek and Demirtas
(2005) compared test scores among students participating and not participating in a voluntary 1:1
laptop program in middle school. A significant difference in test scores was found in favor of stu-
dents participating in the laptop programme.
This study has researched the effect of intensive, daily use of laptops in school, as part of the rou-
tine studies on learning and information literacy skills, by using an assessment tool that was spe-
cially developed for the research. The assessment tool is a complex learning task involving the
use of a computer while implementing diverse learning skills and Information Literacy compe-
tencies such as information retrieval, evaluating information, reading comprehension, information
processing, and preparation and presentation of a visual representation in an attractive and clear
manner.
Research Questions and Overview
The uniqueness of the study proposed here is that this research investigates the impact of learning
through personal laptops (1:1) at a practical, operational level, in the context of conducting a
complex learning task and analyzing it.
To achieve this goal the following research questions were addressed:
To what extent does routine learning with personal laptop computers affect the acquisi-
tion and implementation of learning skills and other components of Information Literacy
among middle school students?
To what extent do students who routinely study with personal laptop computers have
mastery of the learning skills and other components of Information Literacy compared
with students who study in classes without ICT?
This study explores these issues and describes an innovative educational project that started in
2006 in Israel and took place in four schools (three elementary schools (one of which includes
both elementary and middle school) and one middle school) in two small urban communities (i.e.,
covering grades 5-9). All students and all teachers were provided with personal laptop computers
for class and home use. The teaching and learning has been routinely taking place in an ICT-
saturated environment and Virtual Learning Campus (VLC). The study described here took place
within two of the four schools that participated in the project.
86
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
Methodology
Sample
The research sample included 181 students aged 13–15, studying in middle school: 86 boys and
95 girls, 88 seventh-graders (48.62%; aged 13 years), 93 ninth-graders (51.38%; aged 15 years)
(Table 1). All of the students (N=181) study at two middle schools, in two different local authori-
ties, in urban communities. All the students come from a high socio-economic background, ac-
cording to the local authority reports. The students attending one of the middle schools (N=81)
study the traditional way without laptops, being exposed to computers only several times a year
when they are taken for a lesson in the school’s computer lab. The school computer lab comprises
about 40 computers and serves the whole school, which numbers approximately 1,600 students.
The lab is accessible only after prior coordination with the person in charge of it. School com-
puter lessons are rare. This group will be referred to as the comparison group. At the second
middle school, students own personal laptops, which were purchased by parents with the aid of
subsidies, as part of an initiative by the local municipal authority. Ninth-graders have been study-
ing with laptops for four years. Each student studies with his or her own personal computer and
takes it home at the end of the school day. This group of students will be referred to as the inter-
vention group (N=100).
Table 1: Distribution of the research participants by study groups and age level
Research Groups
Gender
& grade
Total
N (%)
Comparison Intervention
Boys 86 (47.52%) 38 48
Girls 95 (52.48%) 43 52
Total 181 81 100
Grade Level
7th 88 (48.62%) 41 47
9th 93 (51.38%) 40 53
Total 181 81 100
Teaching and learning with personal laptops
Regarding the intervention group, studying routinely takes place most days of the week using the
laptop computers throughout the day, in the one-to-one model. Most of the instructional materials
can be found in digital format on a virtual learning campus, so that most of the assignments, out-
comes, and assessment tools are submitted via a learning management system (LMS). During the
lessons, and because of the availability of ICT tools and a variety of media, students are asked to
watch video clips and comment about them; use tools for organizing data and knowledge, such as
graphs, figures, tables; and search for information online to promote a common group outcome.
87
Impact of Learning with Laptops
However, in general, and based on testimonies by the teachers, there is no structured, explicit in-
struction of skills. In this context, a similar situation exists in the comparison group, where based
on testimony of the teachers, there is no explicit instruction of skills.
Research tools
The research included a quantitative assessment tool: a complex learning task which the students
worked on using the computer. The assignment was developed specifically for this study. The
assignment dealt with the subject of "Israel's water crisis". A time limit was set for the students to
complete the assignment (90 minutes) and submit it. The assignment required the students to lo-
cate information online about solutions to the water crisis in Israel, choose one of the solutions,
and create a poster or leaflet explaining why, in their opinion, this was the most suitable solution.
The assignment consisted of using a computer while implementing diverse skills such as informa-
tion retrieval, selecting information, evaluating information and reliability, reading comprehen-
sion, information processing, formulating an argumentative paragraph, preparing a visual repre-
sentation, and presenting it in a clear and attractive format (a poster or leaflet).
The students in the comparison group carried out the assignment during Science lessons in the
school computer lab. The Science teacher and the researcher remained in the classroom during
the assignment in case clarification was needed. Any student who did not finish the assignment
during the allotted time was required to finish the assignment at home after the lesson and send
the completed assignment via email (all students had access to email at home).
The students in the intervention group that had possession of personal laptops carried out the as-
signment during various lessons, according to requirements of the schedule. The students
downloaded the assignment from the school's website or their class’s virtual campus, and worke
on the assignment using their personal laptops in class. The teacher and the researcher remained
in the classroom during the assignment in case clarification was needed and to answer any que
tions. Students were required to submit the assignment to the school’s virtual campus site or to
send the completed assignment by email at the end of the lesson.
d
s-
The submitted assignments were assessed using a detailed rubric that was developed for this
study. The rubric refers to every section of students’ assignment and specifies various learning
skills, components of information literacy, and knowledge.
The assignment's requirements included:
Reading an information passage.
Locating sources of information dealing with ways of solving Israel’s water shortage.
Writing an exact and detailed description of the stages of searching for information
online.
Choosing five relevant and reliable sources.
Choosing one of the information sources – the most appropriate one.
Providing an explanation of what was taken into consideration in selecting the source of
information (professional, reliable, relevant, clear, readable ....)
Providing a description of content or knowledge – in the student's own words.
Explaining the advantages and disadvantages of the solution originally presented in the
source. Looking for more information on the subject if needed.
88
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
Preparing a formatted page (a leaflet/poster) to distribute to people in order for them to
support the selected solution:
Writing an argumentative paragraph explaining the student’s opinion on the matter.
Formatting the page with pictures and illustrations (related to the subject) so it will be in-
teresting and attract people to read and be supportive.
Choosing the appropriate computerized program/tool for designing and preparing the
leaflet/poster. Mastering this program.
The analytical rubric specified 14 detailed criteria and three levels of performance for each crite-
rion. The maximum score of the all assignment was 80. However, when the data was analyzed,
we calculated the relative value of the maximum score so that the maximum final score was 100.
For a comparison between the two research groups regarding the different competencies that were
evaluated by the complex learning task, each criterion was diagnosed separately with a maximum
score of 100.
Validation and Reliability of the Assignment and the Rubric
In the preliminary stage, a sample of about 15% of the assignments were checked by the re-
searcher and in parallel by another rater using the rubric. Compatibility and agreement among
researchers was checked regarding the assessment of student performance. In cases of disagree-
ment, there was a discussion between the raters for clarification and, if necessary, even by amend-
ing the rubric.
For the purpose of validation, the assignment and the rubric were submitted for examination to
three researchers in the field of integrating technology in education, to ensure their validity. Only
later, after reaching a high agreement (95%) among the experts, was the rubric completed and
became a tool for assessing the quality of task performance by the students. During the validation
and while checking the assignments, an effort was made to hide the group affiliation, i.e., whether
the task was carried out by students from the intervention or comparison group. But this conceal-
ment was not always possible.
Inter-judge reliability was calculated. The level of agreement between the raters for all the items
was very high and ranged from 92.9% – 100%. The average agreement rate was 98.46%. Kappa
values for each criterion ranged between 0.47–0.76 and indicated a good to high agreement be-
tween the raters.
Pearson's correlation for evaluation of consistency and reliability was calculated among the raters
and was approved as very high. Significant positive correlations of very high intensity were found
among the raters: r=0.95, p<.01
The range of the positive correlations between the raters' ratings of the various items was 0.74–
0.90.
Note taking: While the students carried out the complex learning task, the researchers wrote notes
regarding special events or phrases that were uttered by the students. These notes were tran-
scribed. The researchers later reread them in order to get a general impression of the students’
reactions while working on the assignment.
Findings
As mentioned above, in order to analyze student performance of the complex tasks, a detailed
analytical rubric was developed. To determine whether there was a difference between the com-
parison and intervention groups in the final score of the task, as well as the level of performance
89
Impact of Learning with Laptops
of the various criteria, a t-test of independent samples was conducted. The analysis found that
there is a significant difference between the comparison group and the intervention group in the
final score of the assignments t(40)=3.0362, p<.05. In other words, the average of the assign-
ment’s total scores in the intervention group (M=65.95, SD=7.64) was significantly higher than
that of the comparison group (M=58.65, SD=7.94). Since the maximum score of the assignment
was 80, we calculated the relative value of the averages that were obtained, had the maximum
score been calculated as 100. Thus, the average total score of the comparison group was 73.25,
whereas the average total score of the intervention group was significantly higher: 82.5 (Figure
1).
Figure 1: Comparison of students performances (N=181) in each sample regarding the total score
and competencies in which a significant statistical difference was found. Each criterion
was evaluated separately, with 100 as maximum score.
Furthermore, the findings reveal nine criteria with significant differences: following instructions;
identifying different types of information sources; organizing information in a table; clear and
detailed writing; identifying indications of reliable sources of information; information process-
ing–identifying advantages and disadvantages; writing an argumentative paragraph; choosing and
showing mastery of the most suitable software application for the product; processing and linking
digital content and media. All indicate a significant higher competency of students in the inter-
vention group who study with personal laptops compared with the students studying in the class-
room without ICT (Figure 1). In four criteria no significant difference was found between groups:
information retrieval, understanding scientific terms, text representation, providing further details.
Next, the intervention and comparison groups were compared according to age level. Figure 2
shows that this comparison, just amongst the seventh-graders, also indicated a significant differ-
ence in the average total score in favor of the intervention group. Moreover, seven items and ca-
pabilities were found in which the students of the intervention group demonstrated a significantly
higher level of performance, as shown in Figure 2.
90
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
Figure 2: Comparison of students' performances in seventh grade (N=88) regarding the total
score and competencies in which a significant statistical difference was found.
These findings reveal seven criteria with significant differences: following instructions; identify-
ing various types of information sources; organizing information in a table; clear and detailed
writing; identifying indications for reliability of sources of information; information processing–
identifying advantages and disadvantages. All indicate that students in the intervention group
studying with personal laptops demonstrated higher competency than students studying in the
classroom without ICT (Figure 2). The findings revealed one criterion in which students from the
comparison group performed significantly better than the intervention group, and that is quality of
the product–formatting an information leaflet/poster (Figure 2). We will elaborate about it further
in the discussion.
Additionally, we compared between the intervention group and the comparison group among the
ninth graders. Figure 3 shows that this comparison, just amongst the ninth-graders, also indicated
a significant difference in the average total score in favor of the intervention group. Moreover,
five items and competencies were found in which the students of the intervention group demon-
strated a higher level of performance, as shown in Figure 3.
These findings reveal five competencies with significant differences of performance: organizing
information in a table: clear and detailed writing; identifying indications for reliability of source
of information; writing an argumentative paragraph; choosing and showing mastery of the most
suitable software application for the product. All indicate higher competency among students in
the intervention group studying with personal laptops compared with students studying in a class-
room without ITC (Figure 3).
While the students carried out the complex learning task, the researchers wrote notes regarding
special events or phrases uttered by the. Based on these notes some marked differences were per-
ceived between the two groups in the study.
91
Impact of Learning with Laptops
Figure 3: Comparison of performance of ninth grade students (N=93) regarding the total score
and competencies in which a significant statistical difference was found.
The comparison group (no ICT)
Problems understanding the basic instructions of working with the computer such as:
"I don’t know how to work on Word, I only have Facebook at home, I just hang
around in chats";
"I don’t know how to fix up this table–it’s too long".
The total duration of the work was longer, and sometimes students did not finish the as-
signments (3 seventh-graders and 5 ninth-graders).
Poor computer tools usage skills–only worked on Word files and PowerPoint presenta-
tions.
The intervention group (studying with personal laptops)
Technical problems with the computers–students without a computer; transformers that
ran out of power and lack of charging areas in the classroom; technical problems with the
computers and Internet working slowly. For example:
"You try working with a computer like ours, and then let’s see what happens";
"It gets stuck all the time, I can’t work like this".
The total duration of work was shorter than in the comparison group, most of the students
finished before the allotted time, there were no students who did not complete the as-
signment.
High level of computer tools usage skills – students worked simultaneously on multiple
websites, with an average of more than three windows running; used the Paint applica-
tion; listened to music while working.
92
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
Discussion and Conclusions
A number of advantages emerge from the research literature for the model of teaching and learn-
ing using laptops in 1:1 classrooms. However, most of the studies find it difficult to demonstrate
changes in students' achievements or heightened quality of teaching and learning (Zucker &
Light, 2009). Most studies about these environments focus on the attitudes of students and teach-
ers and the frequency of use of computers. Very few empirical studies actually examine the stu-
dents’ information competencies and preparing them to acquire 21st century skills (Warschauer,
2008).
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a teaching and learning program with per-
sonal 1:1 laptops on students' acquisition and implementation of learning skills and information
literacy, and the students’ degree of mastery of computerized tools.
By means of the research tool that consisted of a complex, computerized learning task and an
analytical checking rubric, this study found significant differences between the actual competen-
cies of students who learn with personal laptops in 1:1 classes and students who learn with no
ICT in class. Students from 1:1 classes outperformed significantly better in nine out of 15 sub-
criteria, and in the total score. Thus, those students realized better learning and information liter-
acy skills. The heightened competencies were reflected in skills such as comprehending instruc-
tions; the ability to locate and select information; organizing information in a table; evaluating
reliability and credibility of information; distinguishing between sources of information; the qual-
ity of writing an argumentative paragraph; and better production of a leaflet/poster using comput-
erized tools.
In the seventh-grade, significant statistical differences were found in six of the 15 sub-criteria,
and in the total score in favor of the intervention group that studied with laptops. In one criterion
it was the comparison group who performed significantly better: in designing the outcome – a
leaflet or poster. The reason for that finding might be that the seventh-graders who study with no
ICT were so enthusiastic about the work with computers, that they were more creative and more
motivated to design an appealing outcome in comparison to seventh-graders who routinely
worked with laptops. Further examination of that point should include interviews with students.
In the ninth grade, significant statistical differences were found in five of the 15 sub-criteria, and
in the total score. The differences showed that students who study in 1:1 classes performed better
than students who study with no ICT in class.
Thus, ninth grade students who had studied for four years with personal laptop computers, dem-
onstrated statistically significant heightened competencies compared with ninth grade students
who studied in a regular classroom without ICT. The heightened competencies were organizing
information in a table; evaluating the reliability and credibility of information; quality of writing
of the argument; and better production of a poster using computerized tools.
Practical Implications
The findings of this study are very significant. The findings are indicative not on a declarative
level, as are many published studies in 1:1 classes (Penuel, 2006), but on a practical level. Studies
that examine development of learning competencies on a practical level in ICT saturated classes
are not very common in the literature. Another importance of the study we described here is the
fact that its findings reveal the cumulative benefit of teaching and learning in classrooms with
intensive ICT and with the use of personal laptop computers. Students who learn with personal
laptops for two or four years develop better learning skills and information literacy than students
who learn with no ICT. This accumulative effect supports the claims that the investments of re-
sources in 1:1 classes are beneficial in the long run.
93
Impact of Learning with Laptops
Furthermore, the complex computerized learning task that was presented in this paper and the
analytical rubric that was developed to evaluate students' competencies contribute to the growing
efforts and attempts to develop scales or measures with established reliability and validity for the
evaluation of the effects of laptops on student competencies and understanding.
References
Baldwin, F. (1999). Taking the classroom home. Appalachia, 32(1), 10-15. Retrieved October 15, 2008,
from http://www.arc.gov/index.do?nodeId=1297
Bebell, D., & Kay, R. E. (2009). Summary of findings from the Berkshire 1:1 laptop program. Paper pre-
sented at the Annual Meeting of the National Educational Research Computing Conference. Washing-
ton, D. C.
Bebell, D. & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berk-
shire Wireless Learning Initiative. Journal of Technology,
Learning, and Assessment, 9(2).
Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L.M. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: Why multiple
measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45-63.
Beresford-Hill, P. (2000). The laptop computer: Innovation and practice in a time of shifting paradigms.
Retrieved June 28, 2008, from http://www.patana.ac.th/Pubs/Papers/LTComputers.pdf
Bull, G., Bull, G., Garofalo, J., & Harris, J. (2002). Grand challenges: Preparing for the technological tip-
ping point. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(8), 6-12.
Cromwell, S. (1999). Laptops change curriculum – and students. Education World. Retrieved November 6,
2003, from http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr178.shtml
Dunleavy, M., Dexter, S., & Heinecke, W. (2007). What added value does a 1:1 student to laptop ratio
bring to technology-supported teaching and learning? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23,
440–452.
Forkush-Baruch, A., Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., & Tubin, D. (2005). “Islands of innovation” and
“School-wide implementations”: Two patterns of ICT-based pedagogical innovations in schools.
Human Technology, 1(2), 202-215.
Fullan, M. (2001).
The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New-York: Columbia University,
Teachers College.
Guignon, A. (1998). Laptop computers for every student. Education World. Retrieved from
http://www.education-world.com/a_curr/curr048.shtml
Gulek, J. C., & Demirtas, H. (2005). Learning with technology: The impact of laptop use on student
achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(2). Retrieved April 19, 2007,
from http://webdev.shorelineschools.org/instruction/tech/pdf/jtla(1-1impact).pdf
Katz, Y., & Offir, B. (1996). Hamoreh veshiluv hamaxshev behora’a [The teacher and integrating com-
puters in teaching]. In Z. Mevarech & N. Hativa (Eds.), Hamaxshev be’vet hasefer [Computers in
school] (pp. 222-214). Jerusalem and Tel Aviv: Schocken.
Kozma, R.B. (2003). Technology and classroom practices: An international study. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 36(1), 1-14. Retrieved July 11, 2010, from
http://robertkozma.com/images/kozma_jrte.pdf
Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: What does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational
Computing Research, 39(2), 97-122.
Maine Education Policy Research Institute (MEPRI). (2003). The Maine learning technology initiative:
Teacher, student, and school perspectives mid-year evaluation report. Retrieved November 6, 2003
from http://www.usm.maine.edu/cepare/pdf/ts/mlti.pdf
94
Spektor-Levy & Granot-Gilat
Ministry of Education. (2012). Adapting the education system to the 21st century. National plan. Retrieved
from
http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/MadaTech/hatamat_marechet_21/meyda_vepirsumi
m/
Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Forkush, A., & Tubin, D. (2003). Hadshanut hinuxit be’vatei sefer meshulavei
tikshuv [Educational innovation in schools integrating ICT]. Research report IEA-OECD. Office of the
Chief Scientist-Ministry of Education.
Mueller, J. (2009). Assessing critical skills. Columbus, OH: Linworth Publishing.
Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthe-
sis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 38(3), 329-348. Retrieved August 26, 2008, from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/2a/5b/5b.pdf
Rockman et al. (1998). Powerful tools for schooling: Second year study of the laptop program. Retrieved
from http://rockman.com/projects/126.micro.aal/yr2_report.pdf
Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in
upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Bos-
ton, MA: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative. Retrieved June 26, 2007, from
http://www.intasc.org/PDF/Andover1to1.pdf
Russell, M., Bebell, D., O‘Dwyer, L., & O‘Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implica-
tions for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal
of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297-310.
Salomon, G. (2000). Technologia ve’hinuch be’idan hameida [Technology and education in the age of in-
formation]. Tel-Aviv University: Zmora-Bitan.
Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Sturges, K., Caranikas-Walker, F., Huntsberger, B., & Maloney, C. (2009).
Evaluation of the Texas Technology Immersion Pilot: Final outcomes for a four-year study (2004–05
to 2007–08). Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
Silvernail, D., & Buffington, P. (2009). Improving mathematics performance using laptop technology: The
importance of professional development for success. Gorham, ME: Maine Education Policy Research
Institute.
Spektor-Levy, O., Eylon, B. S., & Scherz, Z. (2009). Teaching scientific communication skills in science
studies: Does it make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5),
875-903.
Swan, K., Van ’T Hooft, M., Kratcoski, A., & Schenker, J. (2007). Ubiquitous computing and changing
pedagogical possibilities: Representations, conceptualizations and uses of knowledge. Journal of Edu-
cational Computing Research, 36(4) 481-515.
Warschauer, M. (2005-2006). Going one-to-one. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 34-38. Retrieved from
http://www.gse.uci.edu/person/warschauer_m/docs/going-1-to-1.pdf
Warschauer, M. (2008). Laptop and literacy: A multi-site case study. Pedagogies. An International Jour-
nal, 3(1), 52–67.
Weston, M. E., & Bain, A. (2010). The end of techno-critique: The naked truth about 1:1 laptop initiatives
and educational change. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 9(6). Retrieved September
2011, from http://www.jtla.org
Zucker, A. A., & Light, D. (2009). Laptop Programs for Students. Science, 323, 82-85.
95
Impact of Learning with Laptops
96
Biographies
Ornit Spektor-Levy is a Lecturer in The School of Education at Bar-
Ilan University. Her field of interest is the impact of Information and
Communication Technologies on teaching and learning. Main part of
her studies examines the one-to-one class model. Another field of in-
terest is Science & Technology in inclusive classrooms, teachers' pro-
fessional development; Science & Technology education in pre-school
ages.
Yael Granot-Gilat is a Science & Technology professional teacher in
middle-school and high-school. This paper presents part of her study
for Master degree in the School of Education, Bar Ilan University.
