The perception of indoor air quality (IAQ) in school buildings has garnered
much attention. The self-reported experiences of teachers regarding the
phenomenon of suffering from toxic IAQ was missing from scholarly work before
the onset of the coronavirus. Toxic IAQ can be defined as the presence of toxic
chemicals or compounds (including biological) in the air at levels that pose health
risks and can affect a person's health, comfort, and performance (Environmental
Protection Agency [EPA], 2018a).
Since the onset of the pandemic, teachers are leaving the workforce in
unprecedented numbers due to poor working conditions, unreasonable demands,
and unrealistic expectations (Steiner & Woo, 2021). Addressing teacher retention
is critical to stymie continuing teacher shortages and the adverse impact on
students.
This sequential mixed-methods study confronts the gap between place
theory, specifically the negative emotional person-place bond, and perceived IAQ
in public school buildings. Little research has been presented on the role the
physical workplace has on teacher well-being and whether psychosociological
environmental relationships can predict place attachment outcomes. The
question of how teacher perceptions of IAQ relate to negative place attachment
xvi
was explored using survey research of 242 educators in four public school
districts in the Midwest. Survey data was collected April-May of 2021, with 13
follow-up purposive interviews, with the criteria of teachers’ presenting negative
place attachment feelings, during August 2021. The research revealed the more
teachers realize their health concerns about toxic IAQ in their workplace, the
more negative place attachment they feel. This involves the process of grieving,
and feeling frustrated, angry, exhausted, and confused, like separation and
divorce. When a teacher has crossed a threshold of divorced feelings toward the
school building, they make choices: to stay employed, assigned to their building,
feeling negative place attachment, ask to be reassigned, or leave.
The two significant predictors of negative place attachment revealed
through stepwise linear regression, were physical “healthy building” attributes
and health concerns about the IEQ/IAQ in the school environment. Teachers'
perceptions of aged buildings as being unhealthy, including the inoperability of
classroom windows, aged carpet, and lack of ventilation were better understood
by understanding what it means to occupy a workplace teachers perceive to
have toxic IAQ. Employees with health conditions experienced feelings of being
misunderstood, not taken seriously, and additionally faced a host of complicated
social interactions with their administrators, co-workers, and family because of
health ailments they attributed to their workplace. The study resulted in the
creation of two new theoretic models: a revisiting of Tripartite Model of Place
Attachment to include place detachment, the threshold crossed in absentia of
any place attachment feelings, and an epidemiological model for addressing
xvii
indoor air quality in schools and suggested interventions for practice. While these
models help to develop methods, redress, and identification for negative place
attachment due to indoor air quality, it was not possible to identify a consistent
predictor of negative place attachment. This suggests that the themes identified
in the interview process alongside a predictor model can help identify schools
where intervention is essential.