ArticlePDF Available

Abstract

Tea is a popular beverage made from the leaves of evergreen shrub or tree Camellia sinensis , under the family Theaceae. Tea plant is subjected to the attack of insects, mites, nematodes and some plant pathogenic diseases. Tea production is greatly hindered due to these maladies. About 10-15% crop loss occurred by these pests per annum. In severe cases, it would be 100%. To combat these problems different groups of pesticides have been used in the tea fields since 1960. As tea is a consumable commodity, the effect of residue of pesticides in made tea is harmful to human health. In this context, biopesticides are being considered as environmentally safe, selective, biodegradable, economical and renewable alternatives for use in IPM programmes. Biopesticides are natural plant products and may be grown by the planters with minimum cost and extracted by indigenous methods. Biopesticides are secondary metabolites, which include alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolics, and minor secondary chemicals. It is estimated that as many as 2121 plant species have been reported to posses’ pest control properties. Botanicals like neem, ghora-neem, mahogoni, karanja, adathoda, sweet flag, tobacco, derris, annona, smart weed, bar weed, datura, calotropis, bidens, lantana, chrysanthemum, artemisia, marigold, clerodendrum, wild sunflower and many others may be grown by planters with minimum expense and extracted by indigenous methods. These botanical materials can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides. These botanical extracts will help in controlling major pests of tea such as Helopeltis, red spider mite, aphids, thrips, jassid, flushworm, termites, nematodes etc. The present note reviews the information of most widely available indigenous plants that may be used for the control of insect pests of tea as a component of IPM. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/ijarit.v1i1-2.13924 Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. & Tech. 1 (1&2): 16-23, December, 2011
ISSN: 2224-0616
Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. & Tech. 1(1&2): 16-23, December, 2011 Available at http://www.ijarit.webs.com
PROSPECT OF INDIGENOUS PLANT EXTRACTS
IN TEA PEST MANAGEMENT
M.S.A. Mamun1* and M. Ahmed2
Received 13 September 2011, Revised 1 November 2011, Accepted 25 December 2011, Published online 31 December 2011
Abstract
Tea is a popular beverage made from the leaves of evergreen shrub or tree Camellia sinensis,
under the family Theaceae. Tea plant is subjected to the attack of insects, mites, nematodes
and some plant pathogenic diseases. Tea production is greatly hindered due to these
maladies. About 10-15% crop loss occurred by these pests per annum. In severe cases, it
would be 100%. To combat these problems different groups of pesticides have been used in
the tea fields since 1960. As tea is a consumable commodity, the effect of residue of
pesticides in made tea is harmful to human health. In this context, biopesticides are being
considered as environmentally safe, selective, biodegradable, economical and renewable
alternatives for use in IPM programmes. Biopesticides are natural plant products and may
be grown by the planters with minimum cost and extracted by indigenous methods.
Biopesticides are secondary metabolites, which include alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolics, and
minor secondary chemicals. It is estimated that as many as 2121 plant species have been
reported to posses’ pest control properties. Botanicals like neem, ghora-neem, mahogoni,
karanja, adathoda, sweet flag, tobacco, derris, annona, smart weed, bar weed, datura,
calotropis, bidens, lantana, chrysanthemum, artemisia, marigold, clerodendrum, wild
sunflower and many others may be grown by planters with minimum expense and extracted
by indigenous methods. These botanical materials can be used as an alternative to chemical
pesticides. These botanical extracts will help in controlling major pests of tea such as
Helopeltis, red spider mite, aphids, thrips, jassid, flushworm, termites, nematodes etc. The
present note reviews the information of most widely available indigenous plants that may be
used for the control of insect pests of tea as a component of IPM.
Keywords: Prospect, Biopesticide, Plant Extracts, Tea Pest Management
1Entomology Division, Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, Srimangal, Moulvibazar, Bangladesh;
2Director in-charge, Bangladesh Tea Research Institute, Srimangal, Moulvibazar, Bangladesh
*Corresponding author’s email: shameembtri@yahoo.com
Reviewed by Duraikannu Vasanthakumar, UPASI Tea Research Institute, Valparai, Tamil Nadu, India
Introduction
Tea is predominantly an agro-based, export-
oriented, evergreen, perennial crop grown as a
monoculture on large contiguous areas. Tea plant
is subjected to the attack of pests, diseases and
weeds. In world tea, 1034 species of arthropods,
82 species of nematodes, 1 algal disease and 350
fungal diseases are associated with tea plants
(Chen and Chen, 1989). So far 4 mites, 25 insects,
10 nematodes, 18 fungal and 1 algal diseases and
37 preponderant weed species have been recorded
in tea plantation in Bangladesh (Sana, 1989).
Crop loss caused by pest attack is reported to be
about 10-15% annually (Ahmed, 2005).
As a long-lived woody perennial and monoculture,
tea provides a stable microclimate and a
continuous supply of food for rapid build up of
phytophagous species that includes insects,
mites and eelworms. Each tea growing country
has its own distinctive pests, diseases and weeds.
Tea mosquito bugs, Red spider mite, Termites,
Flushworm, Aphid, Jassid, Thrips and
Nematodes are the major pests of tea in
Bangladesh (Mamun, 2011a). To combat these
problem different groups of pesticides like
organochlorine, organophosphate, pyrethroids,
carbamates and some unclassified group have
been used in the tea fields since 1960. Chemical
pesticides have been used for a long time, but
have serious drawbacks (Sharaby, 1988), such as
direct toxicity to beneficial insects, fishes and
human (Goodland et al., 1985), pesticide
induced resistance (Georghiou and Taylor, 1977),
health hazard (Bhaduri et al., 1989) and
increased environmental and social costs
(Pimental et al., 1980). Overzealous and
16
indiscriminate use of many synthetic pesticides
during recent decades in the control of plant pests
has resulted in a number of environmental and
toxicological problems. Reducing the release of
synthetic chemicals into the environment requires
that alternative sources of chemicals are
developed that can be used safely in the
management of plant pests. Looking back into the
early records of tea pest control history, natural
product e.g. tobacco extract, liquid cowdung,
muddy water and lime sulphur were the principal
materials for pest control. With no other
exception in other tea growing countries, in
Bangladesh also chemical control has been a
dominating feature in pest control in tea and
passed through three generation of pesticides.
Besides these three generation of pesticides, a
fourth generation is in the process which consists
of bio-pesticides like neem or other indigenous
plant extracts, Bacillus thuringiensis etc.
As tea is a consumable commodity, the effect of
residue of pesticides in made tea is harmful to
human health. Heavy reliance on pesticides has
not worked well in terms of integrated pest
management (IPM) of insect pests. It is essential
to find out some eco-friendly alternative methods
for tea pest management. In many countries,
efforts are being made to minimize the use of
harmful insecticides through the use of
indigenous plant products, implementation of
IPM approaches, use of bio-degradable products
(Khattach and Hameed, 1986) and applying insect
growth regulators (Metcalf, 1975). In this context,
biopesticides are being considered as
environmentally safe, selective, biodegradable,
economical and renewable alternatives for use in
IPM programme (Mamun, 2011c). Plant scientists
and agriculturists now devote significant attention
to discovery and further development and
formulation of novel plant products with
antimicrobial activity. Instead, tea entomologists
have focused their attention to develop
environmentally safe, long-lasting and effective
biocontrol methods for the management of insect
pests of tea. Interestingly, extracts of certain
plants contain alkaloids, tannins, quinones,
coumarins, phenolic compounds and
phytoalexins, which are known for pesticidal
activity. Recently, various plant extracts and plant
parts have been reported to have insecticidal
properties (Mahmood et al., 1984). Some plant
extracts posseses significant oviposition
difference or antifeedant or toxic effects on
selected tea pests (Hazarika et al., 2008). This
article is the first to bring together relevant
aspects of the basic and applied sciences of
natural pesticides and discussed modern trends in
the use of natural products in tea pest
management.
Indigenous plant extracts in tea
pest management
Botanical antimicrobials derived from plants are
currently recognised as biodegradable, systemic,
eco-friendly and non-toxic to mammals and are
thus considered safe. Their modes of action
against pests are diverse. Natural compounds are
well suited to organic food production in
industrialised countries and can play greater
roles in the protection of food crops in
developing countries. Some plant based
antimicrobials (e.g. neem products, pyrethroids
and essential oils) are already used to manage
pest populations on a large scale.
Botanical products are environmentally safe, less
hazardous, economic and easily available.
Biopesticides are natural plant products that
belong to the so called secondary metabolites,
which include alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolics,
and minor secondary chemicals. Plants are rich
source of bioactive organic chemicals. It is
estimated that the plants may contain as many as
4000,000 secondary metabolites (Mamun,
2011b). Certain products derived from plant are
uses for tea pest control. As many as 2121 plant
species have been reported to posses’ pest
control properties (Jacobson, 1989); 25 of these
plants species posses the characteristics required
for an ideal botanical insecticide and are
therefore more promising for use in organic pest
control programmes (Radhakrishnan, 2005).
The anti-pest plants documented included,
Capsicum frutescens, Tagetes spp, Nicotiana
tabacum, Cypressus spp., Tephrosia vogelii,
Azadirachta indica, Musa spp, Moringa
oleifera, Tithonia diversifolia, Lantana camara,
Phytollacca dodecandra, Vernonia amygdalina,
Aloe spp., Eucalyptus spp., Cannabis sativa,
Cofea species and Carica papaya (Mugisha-
Kamatenesi et al., 2008). Botanical pesticides
are extracted from various plant parts (leaves,
stems, seeds, roots, bulbs, rhizomes, unripe
fruits and flower heads etc.) of different plant
species. Botanical pesticides are hailed for
having a broad spectrum of activity, being easy to
process and use, having a short residual activity
and for not accumulating in the environment or
in fatty tissues of warm blooded animals, (Philip
and Robert, 1998). Some plants have been
scientifically tested and have been found to have
good pesticidal properties. Botanicals like
Bonkalmi, Bazna, Bishkatali, Datura, Durba,
Eucalyptus, Ghora-neem, Hijal, Karanja,
Mahogoni, Marigold, Neem, Nishinda, Pithraj,
and many others may be grown by farmers with
minimum expense and extracted by indigenous
methods (Mamun et al., 2009). These botanical
materials can be used as an alternative to
chemical pesticides. It will help in controlling
major pests of tea such as Helopeltis, Red spider
17
mite, Thrips, Flushworm, Termites, Nematodes
etc. The following potential indigenous plants
may be used as biopesticides for the control of
insect pests of tea.
Neem (Azadirachta indica): Neem has emerged
as the single most important source of botanical
insecticides having a wide control of numerous
insects, mites, fungi, nematodes and viral
diseases. Neem is a natural source of eco-friendly
insecticides, pesticides and agrochemicals
(Brahmachari, 2004). Neem products have no ill
effects, on humans and animals and have no
residual effect on agricultural produced.
Azadirachtin, an oxygenated triterpenoid,
obtained from the seed kernels of the neem tree,
Azadirachta indica is very effective against pink
and purple mites and certain leaf folding
caterpillars. About 100 proto-limonoids,
limonoids, tetranor-triterpenoids, pentanoor-
tripenoids, hexanor-tripenoids and some
nonterpenoids have been isolated from various
parts of neem tree and still more are being
isolated. These compounds and neem extracts
exhibits almost every type of biological activity
conceivable against a wide range of insects. More
than 400 species of insects have been reported to
be affected by neem compounds (Schmutterer
and Singh, 1995). Neem exhibits antifungal
activity also. Neem leaves and seeds contain
azadirachtin, miliantriol etc. having insecticidal
properties. These constituents are more in seeds
than in other parts of the plant. Now neem is
being used in different formulations such as neem
seed kernels extracts (NSKE), neem decoction,
neem oil, neem cake etc. for the control of pests.
Aqueous plant extract of A. indica exhibited
significant effect on feeding to tea mosquito bug
(Sarmah and Bhola, 2008). So, neem can be used
for the control of Helopeltis, Red spider mites,
Thrips, Flushworm, Scales, Termites, Looper
caterpillar and Nematodes etc. About 25 kg neem
seeds are required to spray in one hectare area of
tea plantation. The spray solution now at 5%
concentration can be used as a spray to repel the
insect pests if any (Mamun, 2008). To spread the
spray solution uniformly over the leaves, an
emulsifier has to be used. The locally available
and cheapest emulsifier is the soap powder. About
50 to 60 gm of the soap powder which will be
about 15 to 20 teaspoons has to be thoroughly
mixed in the knapsack sprayer. This solution can
also be used for a prophylactic application before
the onset of pest attack. The extract should be
used within a day after making in to a formulation
to prevent degradation of the active ingredients.
For enhancing the effectiveness, the spray should
wet the whole plant. Even the lower side of the
leaves has to be smeared with the spray as many
insects and mites lay egg on the ventral side of the
leaves. The extract should be used at least 2-3
times at an interval of 10 to 15 days. Neem cake
can be used @ 50g per pit before planting
seedlings of tea for controlling nematodes.
Application of neemcake @ 2kg/bush was found
to be effective for the plants suffering from the
attack of root knot nematodes, Meloidogyne
brevicauda (Mamun and Iyengar, 2010).
Ghora-neem (Melia azedarach): The plant is
also useful for tea pest management. Melia
azedarach is reported to be the potential source
of azadirachtin and salanin that have high
insecticidal property. Several workers have
reported the relative efficacy of oil cakes from
Melia azedarach in reducing root knot nematode
infestation in cowpeas (Radhakrishnan, 2005).
The seed contains terpenes (mono and
sesqueterpenes) and lactones act as nematicides.
So, it could be incorporated in biopesticides for
the control of nematodes in tea. The seed extract
shows some antifeedant activity against
Helopeltis.
Mahogoni (Swietenia mahagoni): The seeds of
the Mahogoni plant are very toxic to the insect
pests and diseases. So, the seed kernels should
be crushed and mixed with water to prepare the
extracts. The extracts are very effective for the
control of Helopeltis, Red spider mites in tea
(Mamun and Ahmed, 2011).
Karanja (Pongamia pinnata): The seeds of
karanja are also lethal to the insect pests. The
seed extracts of this plant will be very effective to
control Helopeltis, Red spider mites and other
minor insects of tea. The aqueous seed extract at
10% of karanja reduce the infestation of
Helopeltis (43.33%) in tea (Deka et al., 2000).
Oilcakes of P. pinnata reduce the infestation of
root knot nematodes.
Exodus (Sophora flavescens): A formulation
called Exodus containing extracts of a
leguminous plant Sophora flavescens has been
proved very effective against red spider mites in
tea (Muarleedharan, 2005).
Adathoda (Adathoda vasica): The plants have
some ovicidal and antifeedant properties against
Helopeltis (Gurusubramanian et al., 2008). One
kg of fresh leaves are finely pounded, mixed with
six litres of water and allowed to soak for one
day. Then the liquid is filtered and a suitable
sticker such as soap is added. Applications are
best done in the evening time after sunset. This
will effectively control mites in tea. This should
be applied daily for three consecutive days. The
mode of action is antifeedant, insecticidal and
acaricidal.
Sweet flag (Acorus calamus): Rhizomes of this
plant contain calamus, which has insecticidal
properties. Saponins and tannins are the main
active principles. Pest control formulations are
18
obtained by drying and powdering the rhizomes
and making an aqueous extracts. It reduces the
infestation of red spider mites (60-88%) and kills
eggs (33-70%) of the red spider mite in tea
(Gurusubramanian et al., 2008).
Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum): Nicotine was
known since long as the poisonous material of
tobacco. It is a quick acting insecticide. Nicotine is
an alkaloid and it disappears quickly after
application, hence it is used as nicotine sulphate
for insect control. Nicotine sulphate is available in
40% liquid form. It can be diluted with water and
mixed with soap and spray on plants. For
preparing the tobacco solutions, 400g small
pieces tobacco are to be cut and soaked in four
litre of water for one day. Collect the clean liquid
and add soft soap @ 1ml per liter. This
concentrated decoction may be diluted with water
and used for spraying against thrips, scales,
aphids, looper caterpillars etc.
Rotenone (Derris elliptica): The roots of Derris
elliptica a leguminous plant containing 4-11%
rotenone can be used by drying and powdering or
by mixing with water. The spray liquid should
contain 0.002% to 0.004% active ingredient. It is
useful against sucking pests, caterpillars and
some beetles. It acts as a contact and stomach
poison. One hectare of Derris yields about 1.5
litres of roots with 5% rotenone content, enough
active ingredients to treat 500 to 700 ha of tea
plantation.
Annona (Annona squamosa): The leaves and
seeds of this plant contain lanolin and anonaine
having insecticidal properties. The seeds are to be
dried, powdered and made into a solution by
mixing with water or alcohol for application. It is
useful against stem borer, sucking pests, scale
insects etc. The aqueous leaf extract of annona
has antifeedant activity (66-82%) against
Helopeltis (Gurusubramanian et al., 2008).
Smart weed (Polygonum hydropiper): Leaves
and succulent stems of the plant collected, dried,
powdered and soaked for 24 hours for extract
preparation. 10% concentrations of aqueous
extract of Polygonum hydropiper reduce 60-80%
red spider mite with antifeedant and ovicidal
properties (Gurusubramanian et al., 2008). It
also reduces Helopeltis to a desirable level.
Drumstick (Moringa oleifera): Drumstick is
also a valuable bio-pesticidal plant. Drumstick
seeds can be powdered and mixed with stored
pulses to repel the beetles and weevils attacking
the grains. Also an aqueous extract of the tree's
bark is a very powerful repellent.
Albizzia (Albizzia procera): The crude extracts
of the seeds of A. procera are very effective
against coleopteran insects like beetles and
weevils.
Bidens (Bidens pilosa): One tea cup of mature
seeds is poured into a container with water and
boiled for 10 minutes. After cooling down, one
litre of water and small piece of soap is added.
The whole plants also be pounded and soaked
into two litres of water overnight. The solution
may be added with small pieces of soap and
sprayed. The solution acts as insecticide for the
control of aphids, cutworms and termites in tea.
Bur weed (Xanthium strumarium): Xanthium
is a weed having insecticidal and miticidal
properties. It has good repellent (84-100%),
ovicidal (47-60%), antifeedant (27-63%) against
Helopeltis (Sarmah and Bhola, 2008). 5-10%
concentrations of aqueous extract of this plant
also reduce the red spider mites (60-80%) in tea
(Sarmah et al., 2009). It also has good ovicidal
activity (44-87%) of red spider mite
(Gurusubramanian et al., 2008).
Datura (Datura metel): Datura is one of the
toxic plants and can be used as insecticide for the
control of Tea mosquito bug, thrips, jassids,
aphids etc (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011). 500g of
leaves and 500g of pods of Datura plants are
powdered and soaked in 15 litres of water for 24
hours.
Calotropis (Calotropis gigantea): The plant
extracts is very effective against soil pest like
termites (Radhakrishnan, 2005). Ten kg plant
materials is soaked in water for at least 24 hours,
and then filtered. This liquid is poured on
termite infested soil. This spray effectively
controls the pests within three days.
Castor bean (Ricinus communis): Oilcakes of
Ricinus communis is known to have nematicidal
properties (Radhakrishnan, 2005). 500g of
shelled seeds or 750g of unshelled seeds of castor
can be crushed. The crushed seeds should be
heated in two litres of water for 10 minutes. A bit
of soap and two table spoon of kerosene is
added. Then the solution is filtered and then 10
more litre of water is added.
Coriander (Coriandrum sativum): 200g of
crushed seeds are boiled for 10 minutes in one
litre of water, filtered, and diluted @ 1:2 with hot
water. This will act as a repellent against spider
mites in tea (Radhakrishnan, 2005).
Lantana (Lantana camara): The lantana plants
containing the flavanoids, triterpenoids and
alkaloids such as lantanine are the substance
having insecticidal action. Cut 5 kg of lantana
leaves, flowers and fruits into small pieces and
partially crush to control root grubs and
termites. The leaves and flowers after drying can
be extracted with water and used to control
many in insects including Helopeltis, aphids
(Mamun and Ahmed, 2011). The leaf extract of
the plant has excellent acaricidal activity (23-
19
95%) against red spider mite in tea
(Gurusubramanian et al., 2008).
Chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum
cinerariafolium): It is extracted from the dried
flowers of Chrysanthemum. Pyrethrum or natural
pyrethroid is a mixture of six different substances.
The main active principle is the alkaloid
stachydrine. It has the ability to paralyse the pests
on contact. Pyrethrum can be effectively used to
control sucking pests like Tea mosquito bugs,
thrips, aphids, scale insects etc.
Artemisia (Artemisia vulgaris): The plant has
excellent antifeedant properties (60-78%)
(Gurusubramanian et al., 2008). Collect
Artemisia vulgaris plant before flowering and cut
the leaves and stems into small pieces. Take one
kg of cut leaves and stems in a bucket, pour 10
litres of water and keep for 16-24 hours. Then
filtered the liquid and sprayed against common
insect pests of tea. 10% concentration of aqueous
extract of Artemisia vulgaris reduces the red
spider mites in tea.
Aegle (Aegle marmelos): Take 20-25 fruits of
Aegle marmelos and boil in 10 litres of water to
take the extracts. Then add 1 kg of turmeric
powder and keep it for 12 hours. From the extract,
take 1 litre of solution dilute with 10 litres of water
and spray over the entire plants to control thrips.
Marigold (Tagetes erecta): Two kg of marigold
flowers may be crushed and made into a paste by
adding 5-10 litres of water. Then add 5 litres of
water and mix the paste. This solution may be
mixed with 200 litres of water and sprayed on the
plants.
Clerodendrum (Clerodendrum inerme):
Clerodendron inerme Linn. is the common name
of Ghetu, a common herb of verbenaceae family.
The plant also possesses repellent properties.
Clerodendrum the most important weed species
surrounding tea plantation having both
insecticidal and miticidal values. The aqueous
extracts at 10% of Clerodendrum reduce the
infestation of Helopeltis in percent of 49.45
(Deka, et al., 2000). Aqueous extract of
Clerodendrum inerme gave excellent result in
reducing red spider mite (23-100%) populations
as well as Helopeltis (32-60%) in tea
(Gurusubramanian et al., 2008).
Wild sunflower (Helianthus sp.): 2-10%
concentrations of the aqueous extract of
Helianthus sp. reduce the red spider mites (60-
100%) within three days. To prepare the solution,
boil 2 kg of leaves of Helianthus in 10 litres of
water. Dilute one litre of this solution in 10 litres
of water.
Besides, the herbal mixture of certain plant is
very effective against all kinds of insects, mites,
diseases in sustainable tea pest management.
The mixture can be made by the following simple
procedure. About 500g of dried tobacco leaves,
one kg of neem seed kernel, 500g lime powder,
500g Datura leaves and 500g pods and seeds of
olender (Nerium oleander) are powdered and
mixed together, then soaked in 15 litres of water
for 15 days. On alternate days, the mixture needs
to be stirred with stick. After 15 days 1 litre of the
filtrate is mixed in 15 litres of water and sprayed
on the crop. It is enough for 2.5 ha and is meant
to keep away all kinds of pests.
General procedure of indigenous
plant extracts
Collection and processing of plant
materials
Fresh leaves and seeds of indigenous plants are
collected from the surrounding of tea plantation
areas. After bringing them to the laboratory, they
are washed in running water. Firstly the plant
materials are kept in shade for air-drying and
then they are dried in the oven at 60°C to gain
constant weight.
Preparation of plant dust
Dusts are prepared by pulverizing the dried
leaves and seeds with the help of a grinder. Then
the dusts are passed through a 25-mesh diameter
sieve to obtain fine and uniform dust. The dust is
preserved in airtight condition in polythene bags
till their use in extract preparation.
Preparation of plant extracts
The prepared leaf and seed dusts are used for
preparation of plant extract. Ten gram of each
category dust are taken in a 500 ml beaker and
separately mixed with 100 ml of different
solvents (acetone, methanol and distilled water).
Then the mixture is stirred for 30 minutes by a
magnetic stirrer (at 6000 rpm) and left to stand
for next 24 hours. The mixture is then filtered
through a fine cloth and again through filter
paper (Whatman No.1). The filtered materials
are taken into a round bottom flask and then
condensed by evaporation of solvent in a water
bath at 80°C, 55°C and 45°C temperature for
water, methanol and acetone extracts,
respectively. Evaporation is done to make the
volume 10 ml. Stock solutions of plant extracts
are prepared separately by diluting the
condensed extracts with respective solvents
(acetone, methanol and distilled water).
Different concentrations as desired such as 5.0,
7.5, 10.0 and 12.5% etc. of each category of plant
extract are prepared by dissolving the stock
solutions in the respective solvent prior to use of
them.
20
Plate 1. Neem (Azadirachta indica) Plate 2. Mahogani (Swietenia mahagoni) Plate 3. Karanja (Pongamia pinnata)
Plate 4. Adathoda (Adathoda vasica) Plate 5. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Plate 6. Sweet flag (Acorus calamus)
Plate 7. Rotenone (Derris elliptica) Plate 8. Annona (Annona squamosa)
Plate 9.
Lantana (Lantana camara)
Plate 10. Bidens (Bidens pilosa) Plate 11. Artemisia (Artemisia vulgaris) Plate 12. Datura (Datura metel)
Plate 13. Clerodendrum (Clerodendrum inerme)
Plate 14. Bishkatali (Polygonum hydropiper) Plate 15. Bur weed (Xant hium strumarium)
Fig.1. Some potential plants useful in tea pest management
21
The simple SOP for the preparation of indigenous
plant extracts in general for tea pest management
developed by Mamun (2011d) is given below.
Preparation of aqueous plant extracts
Collection of Leaves/Seeds/Rhizomes
De-pulping and drying
Remove seed coat
Oven dry & make powder
Take 25 kg of powder
Add 250 ml adjuvant
Soak in 50 liter of water overnight
Extract and filter through fine cloth
Add 500 liter of water
Spray in 1 hectare area of tea plantation
Conclusion
Tea is an important cash crop as well as
exportable commodity. For sustainable tea
cultivation, integrated pest management system is
the vital component. Planters may use botanical
pesticides to perceive to be as effective as the
synthetic counterparts. It was also noted that the
subsistence planters preferred using botanical
pesticides rather than conventional ones mainly
because of cost and availability. Traditional pest
control methods, especially the use of indigenous
pesticide plants if improved, offer a safer, low cost
and more dependable method of field crops
protection. However, it should not be assumed
that because the botanical pesticides are naturally
derived that they are safe to use and can be
consumed by humans. It intends to carry out a
biosafety assessments of the pesticide plants used
in order to establish their mammalian and
environmental safety. The plants that will be
found to have proven effectiveness and safety will
be studied further to find out how best they can be
used to protect the environment from the
increasing degradation. Then, issues of
propagation and cultivation as on-farm crop for
pest control as well as conservation will be
looked at closely in order to enhance crop
productivity and food security. The use of plant
extracts should be incorporated in the IPM
programme in tea. The indigenous plants are
available surrounding the tea estates as well as
throughout the country. Tea planters may use
these plants for the management of pests of tea.
It will help for producing pesticide free tea. This
will be very helpful in minimizing the
undesirable side effects of synthetic pesticides
and ultimately environmental pollution will be
minimized.
References
Ahmed, M. 2005. Tea Pest Management.
Evergreen Printing and Packaging. Dhaka.
p. 118.
Bhaduri, N., Gupta, D.P. and Ram, S. 1989.
Effect of vegetable oils on the ovipositional
behaviour of Callosobruchus chinensis Fab.
pp. 81-84. In: Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. on
Bruchids and Legumes (ISBL-2). Okayama,
Japan.
Brahmachari, G. 2004. Neem-a omnipotent
plant. A retrospection. Chem. Biochem., 5:
408-421.
Chen, Z.M. and Chen, X.F. 1989. An analysis of
world tea pest fauna. J. Tea Sci., 9: 13-22.
Deka, M.K., Singh, K. and Handique, R. 2000.
Field efficacy of different plant extracts in
controlling tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis
theivora Waterh. J. Appl. Zool. Res., 11(1):
25-28.
Georghiou, G.P. and Taylor, C.E. 1977. Pesticide
resistance as an evolutionary phenomenon.
In: Proc. 14th Int. Cong. Entomol. 759 p.
Goodland, R., Watson, C. and Ledec, G. 1985.
Biocides bring poisoning and pollution to
3rd world. The Bangladesh Observer, 16th
and 17th January, 1995. p. 3.
Gurusubramanian, G., Rahaman, A., Samrah,
M., Roy, S. and Bora, S. 2008. Pesticide
usage pattern in tea ecosystem, their
retrospect and alternative measures. J.
Environ. Biol., 29(6): 813-826.
Hazarika, L.K., Barua, N.C., Kalita, S. and Gogoi,
N. 2008. In search of green pesticides for
tea pest management: Phlogocanthus
thyrsiflorus experience. In Recent Trends in
Insect Pest Management, ed. S.
Ignacimuthu, S. Jayraj. pp. 79-90. New
Delhi, Elite Publication, 277 p.
Jacobson, M. 1989. Botanical pesticides. Past,
present and future. Insecticide of Plant
Origin (Eds. J.T. Arnason, B.J.R. Phlogene
and P. Morand). ACS Symposium Series.
American Chemical Society, Washington
DC., USA. 387: 1-10.
Khattach, S.U. and Hameed, M. 1986. Control of
pulse beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis L. by
gamma radiation, irradiated as unmated
adults. Bangladesh J. Zool., 14(2): 167-169.
22
Mahmood, I., Saxena, S.K. and Zakiuddin, M.
1984. Effect of certain plant extracts on the
mortality of Rotylenchulus reniformis and
Meloidogyne incognita. Bangladesh J. Bot.,
4(2): 154-157.
Mamun, M.S.A. 2011a. Tea pests and their
integrated management in Bangladesh
(Bangla). Krishi Tottho. Agro Bangla. Dhaka.
pp. 1-4. (http://www.agrobangla.com)
Mamun, M.S.A. 2011b. Development of tea
science and tea industry in Bangladesh and
advances of plant extracts in tea pest
management. Int. J. Sustain. Agril. Tech.,
7(5): 40-46.
Mamun, M.S.A. 2011c. Development of integrated
pest management strategy for tea mosquito
bug (Helopeltis theivora W.) in Bangladesh.
J. Subtropical Agril. Res. & Dev., 9(1) : 867-
873.
Mamun, M.S.A. 2011d. Indigenous plant extracts
for the management of red flour beetle: An
ecofriendly sustainable management of
stored grain products”. (ISBN: 978-3-8454-
0160-7). LAP LAMBERT Academic
Publishing GmbH & Co. KG Dudweiler
Landstr. 99, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
112p.
Mamun, M.S.A. and Ahmed, M. 2011. Studies on
indigenous plant extract against major pests
of tea. Unpublished research work of BTRI.
Mamun, M.S.A. and Iyengar, A.V.K. 2010.
Integrated approaches to tea pest
management in south India. Int. J. Sustain.
Agril. Tech., 6(4): 27-33.
Mamun, M.S.A., Shahjahan, M. and Ahmad, M.
2008. Laboratory evaluation of some
indigenous plant extracts as repellent against
red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum
Herbst. Bangladesh j. entomol., 18(1): 91-99.
Mamun, M.S.A., Shahjahan, M. and Ahmad, M.
2009. Laboratory evaluation of some
indigenous plant extracts as toxicants against
red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum
Herbst. J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ., 7(1): 1-5.
Metcalf, R.L. 1975. Insecticides in pest
management. pp. 235-273. In: R.L. Metcalf
and W. Luckmann (eds.). Introduction to
insect pest management. Willey-Inter. Sci.
New York.
Mugisha-Kamatenesi, M., Deng, A.L., Ogendo,
J.O., Omolo, E.O., Mihale, M.J., Otim, J.P.,
Buyungo and Bett, P.K. 2008. Indigenous
knowledge of field insect pests and their
management around lake Victoria basin in
Uganda. African J. Environ. Sci. & Tech.,
2(8): 342-348.
Muraleedharan, N. 2005. Sustainable cultivation
of tea. Planters’ Chronicle, 101(5): 5-17.
Philip G.K. and Robert A.B. 1998. Florida Pest
Control Association.
Pimental, D., Andow, D., Dyson-Hudson, D.,
Gallahan, D., Jacobson, S., Irish, M., Croop,
S., Moss, A., Schreiner, I., Shepard, M.,
Thompson, T. and Vinzant, B. 1980.
Environmental and social cost of pesticides.
A preliminary assessment. Oikos, 34: 125-
140.
Radhakrishnan, B. 2005. Indigenous
preparations useful for pest and disease
management. Planters’ Chronicle, 101(4):
4-16.
Sana, D. L. 1989. Tea Science. Ashrafia Boi Ghar,
36, Bangla Bazar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. pp.
106-200.
Sarmah, M. and Bhola, R.K. 2008. Antifeedant
and repellent effects of aqueous plant
extracts of Azadirachta indica and
Xanthium strumarium on tea mosquito
bug, Helopeltis theivora Waterhouse. Two
and a bud, 55: 36-40.
Sarmah, M., Rahman, A., Phukan, A.K. and
Gurusubramanian, G. 2009. Effect of
aqueous plant extracts on tea red spider
mite, Oligonychus coffeae, Nietner
(Tetranychidae: Acarina) and Stethorus
gilvifrons Mulsant. African J. Biotech.,
8(3): 417-423.
Schmutterer, H. and Singh, R.P. 1995. Lists of
insects susceptible to neem products. In:
The Neem Trees Sources of Unique Natural
Products for Integrated Pest Management,
Medicine, Industry and Other Purposes,
Schmutterer, H. (Ed.), VCH Publishers,
New York.
Sharaby, A. 1988. Evaluation of some Mytraceae
plant leaves as protectants against the
infestation by Sitophilus oryzae L. and
Sitophilus granarius L. Insect Sci. Appl., 9:
465-468.
23
... Similar to many botanicals, basic substances are considered and proven not to be harmful to human or animal health as well as to the environment (EU, 2009;Orconneau et al., 2022). These properties qualify them to enrich plant protection in industrial developed regions (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011;Sergeeva, 2016;Romanazzi et al., 2022). In particular, in organic and other sustainable horticulture cropping systems, these approaches bring about substantial improvements to the existing structures (Marchand, 2017;Đurić et al., 2019;Costantini and La Torre, 2022). ...
... Although Urtica sp. has been used as plant protectant and strengthener for a long time, mostly in organic farming and private gardens (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011;Garmendia et al., 2018), less is known about the effect and the efficacy of the treatment regarding insects and in particular aphids. Bozsik (1996) showed small and insignificant effects of an aqueous extract and a fermented product of U. dioica on the aphids Hyalopterus pruni, Cryptomyzus ribis and Aphis spiraephaga on Prunus domestica, Ribes rubrum and Spiraea vanhuottei. ...
Article
Full-text available
Natural and environmental-friendly approaches to control pests and diseases in horticultural production systems are showing an increasing trend. Biological alternatives, such as botanical extracts and basic substances, show promise in the reduction of the necessity for conventional plant protectants. In ornamentals, less is known about the usage, behaviour and potential of botanicals and basic substances for plant protection. In two trials, we investigated the effect of a weekly foliar spray of an aqueous extract of nettle ( Urtica sp.; dried material 15 g · L –1 ) on two aphids, Macrosiphum euphorbiae and Aulacorthum solani . Experiments were conducted in the greenhouse with Ranunculus asiaticus as hostplant. The Urtica tea and azadirachtin (NeemAzal-T/S) as a standard used in common horticultural production were compared with the water control. Both previously infested and noninfested plants were built up to examine the effect on aphid population growth and migration. As a result, we showed that both treatments, Urtica tea and azadirachtin, reduce the aphid density significantly in comparison with the water control, although the effect of the Urtica tea was not as substantial as that of azadirachtin. Contrarily, treatments could not prevent aphid migration on previously noninfested plants. The study demonstrates that the basic substance Urtica tea can be suitable for the reduction of aphid pests in ornamental plant production, and thus, reduce the amount of synthetic plant protectants in horticulture.
... In contrast, their thorough use has led to severe problems similar to insecticide resistance in several stored product insects like Sitophilus species (Fields and White, 2002;Ducom, 2012;Maletsema Alina, 2016;Pavlidi et al., 2018;Chelef et al., 2020). The other safe, effective, and eco-friendly methods are using alternative insecticides such as EOs and plant extracts to control insects' stored products (Koul and Walia, 2009;Mamun and Ahmed, 2011;Mackled et al., 2019;Mahomed et al., 2019;Mosa et al., 2021;Ghareeb et al., 2022). The activity of insecticides on different citrus species has been demonstrated in numerous studies (El-Akhal et al., 2014;Abdelgaleil et al., 2015). ...
... The achieved results clarified that the efficiency of the lemon EOs was directly related to concentration and response. Using effective and eco-friendly materials such as EOs and plant extracts is an alternative method to control the stored product insects in many crops after harvest (Koul and Walia, 2009;Mamun and Ahmed, 2011;Mackled et al., 2019;Mahomed et al., 2019;Mosa et al., 2021). The current results showed insecticidal activity for the lemon leaves and peel EOs against the rice weevils, and its recommended use and these results are in harmony with previous studies (El-Akhal et al., 2014;Abdelgaleil et al., 2015). ...
Article
Full-text available
Ten-year-old lemon ( Citrus limon L. cv. Eureka) was used during the 2019 and 2020 seasons to investigate the effect of AgNPs at control, 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/L as a foliar application on vegetative growth, yield, and fruit quality. The selected trees were subjected to agricultural practices applied in the field during the study. The results indicated that the foliar application of AgNPs positively improved the shoot length, total chlorophyll, flower, and fruit set percentage, fruit yield, physical and chemical characteristics of fruits, and leaf mineral composition from macro and micronutrients compared to control in both seasons. The foliar application of AgNPs at 10 mg/L showed the highest mean values followed by 7.5 and 5 mg/L, respectively, for the previous characteristics. The treated leaves and fruit peels were hydrodistillated to extract the essential oils (EOs), and GC–MS analysis of leaf EOs. The analysis of leaves EOs showed the presence of neral, geranial, neryl acetate, and limonene as the main abundant bioactive compounds. While in peel the main compounds were neral, geranial, neryl acetate, D -limonene, geraniol acetate, linalool, and citronellal. Toxin effect of both EOs from leaves and peels were evaluated on the rice weevils ( Sitophilus oryzae ) and the results indicated a higher effect of lemon peel EOs than leaves based on mortality percentage and the values of LC 50 and LC 95 mg/L. Melia azedarach wood samples loaded with the produced lemon EOs were evaluated for their antifungal activity against the molecularly identified fungus, Fusarium solani (acc # OL410542). The reduction in mycelial growth was increased gradually with the applied treatments. The most potent activity was found in lemon leaf EOs, while peel EOs showed the lowest reduction values. The mycelial growth reduction percentages reached 72.96 and 52.59%, by 0.1% leaf and peel EOs, respectively, compared with control.
... It was collected and shade dried after measured at 10, 30 and 50 g of botanicals were crushed and then soaked overnight in double the quantity of water. Later, the mixture was squeezed through the muslin cloth and the volume was made up to one litre to obtain 1, 3 and 5% solution and 2 g/lit of soap powder was mixed and stirred well which act as a surfactant (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011;Archunan, 2018). Culturing of S. dorsalis was maintained in pot culture covered with the muslin cloth. ...
... Similarly, Nareshchandra (2016) studied the efficacy of 13 botanicals and results indicated that of Datura metel (L.) leaves extract 10 per cent was the best in reducing thrips population. Datura is one of the toxic plants and can be used as an insecticide for the control of Tea mosquito bug, thrips, jassids, aphids etc (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011 ...
... Among these alternatives, botanicals can prove to be a promising solution. More than 2000 plant species are estimated to have some sort of pest control potential (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011). Many plants or their products are known to have antiparasitic and anti-tick activities (Shnawa et al., 2017;Selles et al., 2021;Eltaly et al., 2022). ...
... As many as 2121 plant species have been reported to posses' pest control properties; 25 of these plants species posses the characteristics required for an ideal botanical insecticide and are therefore more promising for use in organic pest control programmes (Radhakrishnan, 2005). Botanicals like neem, ghora-neem, mahogani, karanja, adathoda, sweet flag, tobacco, derris, annona, smart weed, bur weed, datura, calotropis, bidens, lantana, chrysanthemum, artemisia, marigold, clerodendrum, wild sunflower etc. are available surroundings of the tea garden or may be grown by the planters with minimum expense and extracted by indigenous methods (Mamun and Ahmed, 2011). These botanical materials can be used as an alternative to chemical pesticides. ...
Article
Full-text available
A trial was conducted at BTRI farm during January 2012 to December 2013to evaluate the performance of poultry manure on the yield of mature tea and on soil properties. Poultry manure wasapplied in different rates (0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 ton/ha) with 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% of the BTRI recommended fertilizer doses. Poultry manure was applied once while BTRI recommended fertilizer was applied in two splits in a year. Yield of tea was recorded at seven days interval during the harvesting season. Soil samples were collected before starting the experiment as well as after completion of the experiment and analyzed accordingly. Highest yield (1442 kg made tea/ha) was recorded in T4where 0.75 ton/ha poultry manure was applied along with 25% of BTRI recommended chemical fertilizer. The yield increase was 21.69% over the control. A slight increase of the macro and micro nutrients were found. But the changes of the nutrient status due to the application of poultry manure were insignificant.
... ▪ The necessary statistical analysis like mean ± SE was calculated. [15,9,7] . ▪ The application of green pesticides was done using a glass automizer through which a definite quantity of pesticidal fluid was sprayed topically on the test mite. ...
Article
Full-text available
Tea Camellia sinensis L. is an aromatic crop that has become the most popular non-alcoholic beverage drink for two-thirds of the world's population. Bangladesh contributes almost 3.0% of global tea production with high export potential through increasing the production using proper management of insect and mite pests. Tea mosquito bug, termite, thrips and looper caterpillar are the major insect pests of tea and red spider mite (RSM) is the number one mite pest. RSM draws special attention to the tea planters because of its year-round presence causing 17 to 46% crop loss. The tea gardeners use a large number of broad-spectrum synthetic pesticides to control major soil-dwelling pests (termite and other soil pests), sucking pests (thrips, jassid and scale insects), chewing pests (leaf roller, looper caterpillar and flush worm) and other minor pests. The overuse of highly toxic pesticides has incurred high pest management costs, killing beneficial arthropods, causing secondary pest outbreaks, pesticide residue and other complications in tea production. Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) programs could be possible solutions for these problems. The use of resistant varieties, timely adoption of cultural and mechanical practices (plucking, pruning, cleaning, sanitation, irrigation, drainage, weeding, etc.), physical practices (destruction of pests, yellow trap, light trap, etc.), biological control (conservation of predators, parasitoids), use of bio-pesticides, sex pheromones, entomopathogenic microbes (bacteria, virus, fungi), extracts of plant parts (neem seed kernel,mahogany, nishinda, ghato, michania, etc.) have been reported as eco-friendly pest management techniques for RSM management. In this review paper, IPM strategies for major pests especially for RSM have been suggested.
Article
Full-text available
The scale insects reduce plant photosynthetic ability by sucking sap from leaves and causing significant damage to the tea crop in most tea-producing countries. They suck the sap from stems and tea leaves, which not only prevents further growth but also reduces the nutritional quality of the leaves by promoting the growth of sooty molds. However, due to the widespread use of organosynthetic pesticides in recent decades, most insect pests have developed high levels of pesticide resistance, reducing the effectiveness of insecticide application. Bio-control agents are environmentally safe and produce long-term results while reducing the use of chemicals and other pesticides without disrupting the natural equilibrium. The review includes a list of coccidicides discovered on tea in major tea-growing countries as potential tea pests. The scope of future studies and the plans for better management of this serious sucking pest of the tea plant are also discussed in this review.
Article
Full-text available
Bacterial leaf spot disease incited by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vescatoria affects solanum plants worldwide and caused up to 40-70% yield loss of Solanum scabrum. Efficacy of Bidens pilosa and Euphorbia hirta leaf and root extracts and one synthetic chemical Ridomil ® was evaluated for control of bacterial leaf spot in Solanum scabrum. The experiment was laid out in randomized complete block design with three replicates. Seedlings were inoculated with Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria isolated from diseased S. scabrum and then treated separately with test concentrations of 25%, 50%, 100% and 50 mg/ml 100 mg/ml and 200 mg/ml for water and ethanol extract respectively. The extracts reduced disease severity with the highest concentrations (100% and 200 mg/ml significantly lowering disease severity compared to other extracts and Ridomil ®. Plants treated with high concentrations of extracts had high growth vigor when stem diameter, plant height and leaf weight were evaluated. Reduction in disease severity and promotion of plant growth could be due to presence of secondary metabolites with antimicrobial activity and growth promoting hormones in the extracts. From this study B. pilosa and E. hirta extracts can be used as an alternative to synthetic chemical to control bacterial leaf spot disease of solanum. Future studied should focus on isolating active compounds to be used in formulating pesticides.
Article
Full-text available
A study was made of the indirect costs that result from pesticide usage in the United States. These costs included: 45,000 annual non-fatal and fatal human pesticide poisonings; $ 12 million in livestock losses; $ 287 million in reduced natural enemies and pesticide resistance; $ 135 million in honey bee poisonings and reduced pollination; $ 70 million in losses of crops and trees; $ 11 million in fish and wildlife losses; and $ 140 million in miscellaneous losses. The estimated total of $ 839 million annual losses attributed to environmental and social costs of pesticide use represents only a small portion of the actual costs. A more complete accounting of the indirect costs would probably be several times the total reported. The results of this preliminary assessment underscore the serious nature of the environmental and social costs of pesticide use. /// Исследовали непрямые убытки, являющиеся результатом использования пестицидов в США. Эти убытки включают 45000 ежегодных отравлений людей пестицидами со смертельньм и несмертельньм исходом, 12 млн долларов, - потрери домашнего скота, 287 млн долларов - сокращение численности естественных врагов и снижение разистентности и пестицидам, 135 млн долларовотравление пчел и сокращение опыления, 20 млн долларов - потери урожая сельскохозяйственных культур и деревъев, 11 млн долларов - потери рыбы и дичи, и на 140 млн долларов различные другие потери. Общие ежегодные потери исчисляются в 839 млн долларов. Это - зкологические и социальные последствия применения пестицидов, которые представляют лишь небольшую часть фактических убытков. Более полный подсчет косвенных убытков будет очевидно представлен в ряде публикаций. Результаты этого предварительного подсчета подчеркивают большое значение зкологических и социальных последствий применения пестицидов.
Article
Full-text available
Food security and poverty alleviation has remained the primary agenda in the Eastern Africa regional food policies, and Uganda is no exception. Field pests that attack crops are among the greatest threat to increased food production. The subsistence farmers in the Lake Victoria Basin (LVB) rarely use synthetic pesticides in the field due to the high cost and availability issues. Therefore, some rely on the use of botanical pesticides and other natural methods of pest control. However, this indigenous knowledge (IK) on botanicals has remained largely unexploited with limited regional research and resources committed and these are the premises upon which this ethnobotanical fieldpests management survey was launched and conducted. Most of the respondents were women (59%). The study findings revealed that the major field pests reported by farmers in declining order of importance, included banana weevil, bean fly, cereal stem borers, pod feeders, grain moth, rodents, moths, termites, birds, aphids and cutworms. The anti-pest plants documented included, Capsicum frutescens, Tagetes spp, Nicotiana tabacum, Cypressus spp., Tephrosia vogelii, Azadirachta indica, Musa spp, Moringa oleifera, Tithonia diversifolia, Lantana camara, Phytollacca dodecandra, Vernonia amygdalina, Aloe spp., Eucalyptus spp., Cannabis sativa, Cofea species and Carica papaya. The study has demonstrated that usage of botanical pesticides in field pest management is normal around Lake Victoria basin for the subsistence farmers since all the 117 respondents had ever tried or used botanical pesticides. We recommend more specialized studies in the usage of the plant-based pesticides to ensure safety and effectiveness that will enhance food security and environment protection. In addition, appropriate recommendations generated on the issues investigated will be advanced as leads for further research, extension and regional industrial endeavors in the LVB.
Article
Full-text available
Four aqueous plant extracts (APEs) of Acorus calamus (L), Xanthium strumarium (L), Polygonum hydropiper (L) and Clerodendron infortunatum (Gaertn) were evaluated under both laboratory and field conditions at 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0% (w/v) concentrations against tea red spider mite, Oligonychus coffeae (Nietner). Also, the impact of APEs on survival and feeding of Stethorus gilvifrons, a potent coccinellid predator of red spider mite was studied. Parameters assessed were ovicidal activity and acaricidal activity in case of red spider mite, and feeding activity and adult mortality for the coccinellid. Strong ovicidal action was observed with X. strumarium (87.09%) and A. calamus (70.62%) whereas least action in P. hydropiper (30.86%) and C. infortunatum (20.58%). All the APEs showed > 50% mortality of red spider mite at higher concentrations (5 and 10%) under laboratory conditions. Field evaluation of APEs recorded 46.9 - 81.8% mite reduction at 5.0% and 64.7 - 100.0% at 10.0% concentration. More acaricidal activity was noticed in C. infortunatum and X. strumarium under field condition. The APEs, even at higher concentration (10%), caused no mortality to the adults of S. gilvifrons for 14 days, and no significant change in feeding after 24 h in comparison with untreated control. Crude plant extracts of A. calamus, X. strumarium, P. hydropiper and C. infortunatum can effectively be utilized as safer phytopesticidal products in both organic and inorganic tea estates as one of the potent tools in integrated mite management.
Article
Sun-dried guava (Psidium guajava L.) and eucalyptus (Eucalyptus globulus L.) leaves were evaluated as repellent and toxic materials against the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae L., and the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius L. under laboratory conditions. LC50 values of sun-dried guava and eucalyptus leaves admixed with rice grains against S. oryzae were 2.251 and 4.140g leaves/100g rice grains, respectively, while they were 2.278 and 4.857 g leaves/100 g rice grains in the case of S. granarius, respectively. Guava leaves were more toxic for both species than eucalyptus leaves. Eucalyptus leaves were more repellent than guava leaves. Both test materials at 15 g/100 g depressed the progeny development of the test insects.