Content uploaded by Stano Pekar
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Stano Pekar on Dec 25, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Chapter 31
Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders
Stano Peka
´r
31.1 Introduction
Spiders are natural enemies occurring in many agroecosystems. Indeed, they are
often the most abundant and diversified natural enemies, which contribute to the
reduction of several pests. However, certain pest management practices, such as the
application of pesticides, can disrupt their role in pest control. There are a number
of different synthetic insecticide and acaricide classes with varying effects on the
nontarget arthropods. Most synthetic insecticides such as organophosphates,
cyclodienes, pyrethroids, carbamates, and organochlorines are neurotoxic and
have a highly negative effect. A few are insect growth regulators, antifeedants, or
microbial pesticides, which are usually less detrimental, at least in terms of acute
toxicity. Unexpectedly, even herbicides and fungicides or their additives can have
serious detrimental effects.
Research on the ecotoxicology of spiders has received rather limited attention in
comparison with other natural enemies, for example, parasitoids (Theiling and
Croft 1988). Early papers investigated the side effects of pesticides in the field by
focusing on the abundance of the spider population and species richness of the
community. Later toxicological studies mainly evaluated the direct toxicity, specif-
ically mortality at different pesticide concentrations and/or doses, with a main
emphasis on the concentration/dose recommended for pest control. Formulations
that caused low mortality were considered harmless and recommended for use.
However, such acute toxicity tests did not consider side effects on other life-history
traits, such as foraging, defence, mating, or migration, which may severely impair
spider pest control abilities. Recent research, therefore, focuses more on the
mechanisms behind the intoxication of surviving individuals and, in particular, on
so-called sublethal effects.
S. Peka
´r(*)
Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
e-mail: pekar@sci.muni.cz
W. Nentwig (ed.), Spider Ecophysiology,
DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-33989-9_31, #Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013
415
The type of effect is a function of the concentration and/or dose (Fig. 31.1). At
relatively high concentrations/doses, contact with a formulation causes high mor-
tality. This is known as a direct effect. At concentrations/doses lower than LC
50
(i.e., lethal concentration) or LD
50
(i.e., lethal dose)—that is, concentration/dose at
which more than 50 % of individuals survive—sublethal effects are observed.
These are evaluated as behavioural or physiological changes in an individual that
survived exposure to a pesticide. Yet even lower concentrations/doses may have a
stimulating effect on behavioural and physiological functions. Such effects are
called hormesis. Very low concentrations or doses have negligible or no effect.
For example, contact with herbicide did not affect the walking activity of two
lycosid species, Pardosa milvina and Hogna helluo (Evans et al. 2010), or court-
ship, mating, prey capture, or escape from predators in another lycosid Pardosa
palustris (Michalkova
´and Peka
´r2009). The application of carbamate did not alter
web structure in an araneid Larinioides sclopetarius (Lengwiler and Benz 1994).
Oviposition and fecundity did not decrease in the lycosid Pirata piratoides after
insect growth regulator application (Deng et al. 2008). Rate of development was not
extended in the lycosid Pardosa amentata after contact with pyrethroid and organ-
ophosphate (Toft and Jensen 1998). Diacylhydrazine did not affect the functional
response in the philodromid Philodromus cespitum (R
ˇeza
´c
ˇet al. 2010).
31.2 Direct Effect
Mortality resulting from contact with a pesticide, administered topically, orally, or
via residues, differs among pesticides, formulations, spider species, developmental
stage, and sex and is also influenced by current abiotic and biotic conditions. In
general, highest mortality was caused by standard doses of insecticides and
Concentration / Dose
No effect
Hormesis
Sublethal effect Direct effect
1.0
0.5
0
Probability of mortality
LC/LD 50
Fig. 31.1 Logit response
curve of mortality showing
the variety of effects in
relation to the concentration
or dose (LC or LD
50
)
416 S. Peka
´r
acaricides and lowest mortality by fungicides and herbicides (Theiling and Croft
1988). The causes of mortality differ among pesticide classes. Little is known of
their effect in spiders. Neurotoxic formulations, such as type I pyrethroids, have a
quick knockdown effect. The symptoms of type II pyrethroids include ataxia,
convulsions, contractions, and paralysis. Mortality is caused secondarily through
disturbing the water balance. Besides the effect on neurotransmitters,
organophosphates tend to accumulate in cell membranes and modify their perme-
ability. It has been shown in the sparassid Polybetes pythagoricus that contact with
organophosphate altered the lipid dynamics and caused diminished capacity for
oxygen binding (Cunningham et al. 2002). Pyrethroids can further cause dysfunc-
tion in myocardial cells and alter heart rate (Desneux et al. 2007).
31.3 Sublethal Effects
Sublethal effects have been studied in 21 species of spiders using 26 formulations
(Table 31.1). The frequency of encountering sublethal concentrations/doses for
spiders in the field is assumed to be higher than that of lethal doses. Due to the
enhanced stability of synthetic pyrethroids in the environment, spiders may contact
sublethal doses for several days after spraying (Baatrup and Bayley 1993). Sublethal
doses also occur when the pesticide is diluted in water (such as dew) or because of the
filter effect of plants or spray drift, which give rise to surfaces with sparse contami-
nation. Such situations are frequent in many types of crops. A further situation arises
because of webs. Three-dimensional webs of theridiid and dictynid spiders can
reduce contact of the resident spider with pesticide droplets (Peka
´r1999).
Different classes of pesticides can cause different sublethal effects. These effects of
intoxication interact with numerous life-history traits and can be measured by
investigating changes in physiology and behaviour. Behavioural responses often reflect
changes at the physiological level. Activities such as movement, prey capture, repro-
duction, development, and defence are highly sophisticated, governed by complex
neural interactions, and particularly disrupted by neurotoxic formulations. However, in
contrast to direct effects, recovery from sublethal effects is possible over several days.
For example, P. amentata recovered in 3–4 days (Baatrup and Bayley 1993).
31.3.1 Enzymatic Activity
Pesticides can have a dramatic effect on many physiological processes. Organopho-
sphorous and carbamate compounds inhibit cholinesterases, enzymes in the central
nervous system, as has been shown for the lycosid Anoteropsis hilaris following
organophosphates application (Van Erp et al. 2002) and the linyphiid Hylyphantes
graminicola following both organophosphate and pyrethroid applications (Peng
et al. 2010). In the latter species, reduced activity of cholinesterases pertained even
to offspring.
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 417
Table 31.1 List of spider species and synthetic formulations that have been used to evaluate sublethal effects
Family/species Insecticide (acaricide) Fungicide Herbicide Reference
Araneidae – – – –
Alpaida veniliae – – Glyphosate Benamu
´et al. (2010)
Araneus
diadematus
Cypermethrin, paraffin oil Prochloraz,
triadimenol
– Samu and Vollrath (1992)
Larinioides
sclopetarius
Deltamethrin, diazinon, dicofol, pirimicarb – – Lengwiler and Benz (1994)
Neoscona
pratensis
Endosulfan, spinosad – – Benamu
´et al. (2007)
Linyphiidae – – – –
Erigone atra Fenvalerate – – Dinter et al. (1998)
Frontinella
communis
Malathion – – Tietjen and Cady (2007)
Hylyphantes
graminicola
Dimethoate, fenvalerate, methamidophos – – Deng et al. (2006,2007) and Peng et al. (2010)
Oedothorax
apicatus
Deltamethrin, fenvalerate – – Everts et al. (1991), Jagers op Akkerhuis et al.
(1995;1997) and Dinter et al. (1998)
Tenuiphantes
tenuis
Cypermethrin – – Shaw et al. (2005)
Lycosidae – – – –
Anoteropsis
hilaris
Chlorpyrifos, diazinon – – Van Erp et al. (2002)
Pardosa
amentata
Cypermethrin, dimethoate, l-cyhalothrin – – Baatrup and Bayley (1993), Toft and Jensen
(1998), Nielsen et al. (1999) and Shaw et al.
(2006)
Pardosa milvina – – Glyphosate Evans et al. (2010) and Wrinn et al. (2012)
Pardosa palustris Chlorpyrifos + cypermethrin, deltamethrin – Clomazone,
glyphosate
Peka
´r and Benes
ˇ(2008) and Michalkova
´and
Peka
´r(2009)
Pardosa
pseudoannulata
Imidacloprid, methamidophos – – Widiarta et al. (2001) and Wang et al. (2006a,
b)
Pardosa
prativaga
Dimethoate – – Pedersen et al. (2002)
418 S. Peka
´r
Pirata piratoides Buprofezin – – Deng et al. (2008)
Rabidosa rabida Malathion – – Tietjen (2006) and Tietjen and Cady (2007)
Schizocosa
ocreata
Malathion – – Tietjen and Cady (2007)
Philodromidae – – – –
Philodromus
cespitum
Acetamiprid, azadirachtin,
chlorpyrifos + cypermethrin, deltamethrin,
diflubenzuron, methoxyfenozide, spinosad
– Clomazone Peka
´r and Benes
ˇ(2008) and R
ˇeza
´c
ˇet al. (2010)
Salticidae – – – –
Salticus scenicus Malathion – Tietjen and Cady (2007)
Sparassidae – – – –
Polybetes
pythagoricus
Fenitrothion – – Cunningham et al. (2002)
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 419
Acetylcholinesterase is an enzyme decomposing the neurotransmitter acetylcho-
line. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase would lead to hyperactivity and general
perturbation in all systems. This can result in death. Spiders can resist neurotoxic
effects by producing detoxification enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferase and
glutathione peroxidase. The absence or low activities of detoxification enzymes
increase their susceptibility. In Pardosa amentata Nielsen et al. (1999) found that
detoxification enzymes are present in the bodies of spiders throughout the year. The
activity of glutathione S-transferase was affected only slightly by pyrethroid appli-
cation, while the activity of glutathione peroxidase was strongly induced. Similarly,
in another study, glutathione S-transferase was not induced by an organopho-
sphorous formulation applied on Anoteropsis hilaris (Van Erp et al. 2002). Gluta-
thione peroxidase, unlike glutathione S-transferase, is thus considered an important
system used to combat unpredictable exposure to toxins. Alternatively, resistance to
intoxication can be achieved by the overproduction of acetylcholinesterase, which
was found to be affected by the nutritional state of spiders. Pedersen et al. (2002)
found a strong synergistic effect of nutrition on the regenerative ability of acetyl-
cholinesterase after organophosphate application in the lycosid Pardosa prativaga.
Not only enzymes in the nervous system were found to be affected by pesticides.
Wang et al. (2006a) reported the inhibition of protease activity in the gut of spiders
following application of a high dose of an organophosphate on the lycosid Pardosa
pseudoannulata.
31.3.2 Water Loss
It is known that contact with neurotoxic formulations (organophosphorous, carba-
mate, cyclodiene, and pyrethroid) causes accelerated water loss (Everts et al. 1991),
which can lead to mortality, as has been observed in the linyphiid Oedothorax
apicatus (Jagers op Akkerhuis et al. 1997). Using this species as a model, the
following scenario has been predicted. Contact with pyrethroid will cause abnormal
signalling intensity of the humidity in the cuticle. Such false signalling will cause
the spiders to stop searching for a more favourable humid environment, which is
also achieved via locomotion disruption. After penetration of pyrethroid into the
haemolymph, diuretic hormone is produced, which will cause active water excre-
tion (Jagers op Akkerhuis et al. 1997). Indeed, pyrethroids have been shown to
increase diuresis by anal excretion (Everts et al. 1991). If passive water loss and
water excretion increases with time, it can lead to mortality, particularly in a dry
environment (Jagers op Akkerhius et al. 1995). In O. apicatus, high susceptibility
was found at high temperatures and low humidity. High humidity, on the other
hand, reduced intoxication.
420 S. Peka
´r
31.3.3 Movement
Locomotion is a fundamental behavioural property of spiders. It reflects interaction
with the environment; therefore, walking activity is the easiest behaviour in which
to detect sublethal effects, particularly in cursorial species. At relatively higher
doses or concentrations, movement is usually reduced, while at relatively lower
doses or concentrations, it is induced. The application of pyrethroids on P. amentata
caused ataxia and paralysis of the fourth legs for 3 days, probably due to relaxation
of the flexor muscles (Shaw et al. 2006). It increased quiescence for 12 h, and
recovery was observed after 24 h (Baatrup and Bayley 1993). In two linyphiids,
Tenuiphantes tenuis and Oedothorax apicatus, pyrethroids reduced levels of move-
ment, which lasted for several days (Shaw et al. 2005; Everts et al. 1991). This is
because high velocities require greater neural control and energy, which the spider
is likely deprived of. Contact with surfaces treated with organophosphate shifted the
circadian rhythm in the lycosid Rabidosa rabida and the salticid Salticus scenicus
(Tietjen and Cady 2007). The spiders were active earlier than normal. The authors
suggest that organophosphate affected the interaction between the light receptors
and the circadian clock. The lycosid Pardosa palustris not only moved less on
organophosphate- and pyrethroid-treated surfaces than on control (Fig. 31.2) but
exhibited an uncoordinated walking pattern (Peka
´r and Benes
ˇ2008).
If movement is induced, it is probably an indication of avoidance and subsequent
dispersal. Avoidance is induced by repulsion. In pyrethroids, the active ingredient is
often highly repellent, whereas in other pesticides repulsion is caused by the
additives (Desneux et al. 2007). Whether pesticides induce dispersal has not yet
been studied. However, results from two studies suggest that it might. The lycosid
Pardosa milvina increased its speed of movement on a herbicide-treated surface and
thus minimised exposure and risk (Evans et al. 2010). Contact with a surface treated
with an organophosphate elevated activity in the lycosids Schizocosa ocreata and
R. rabida, in the linyphiid Frontinella communis, and in the S. scenicus presumably
because the spiders tried to avoid it (Tietjen and Cady 2007). Alternatively,
ab
Fig. 31.2 Path tracks by Pardosa spiders when exposed to control surface (a) and pyrethroid
residues (b) for a period of 2 h
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 421
in lycosid and salticid species, increased activity could be caused by impaired visual
processing due to the abnormal function of neurotransmitters in the protocerebral
ganglion.
31.3.4 Predation
Reduced locomotor activity must have a negative effect on prey search and
frequency of capture, particularly in cursorial species. In web-building species,
such inhibition leads also to alteration of the web size and/or web design. Further-
more, some pesticides may reduce olfactory capacity and disrupt the detection of
kairomones from prey and, if a pesticide has an antifeedant property, even decrease
consumption (Desneux et al. 2007).
Reduced prey capture frequency lasting for several days was reported for several
species: Pardosa pseudoannulata after neonicotinoid application (Widiarta et al.
2001); the araneid Neoscona pratensis following spinosyn application (Benamu
´
et al. 2007); and Pardosa amentata and two linyphiids, Erigone atra and Oedothorax
apicatus, following the application of pyrethroids (Dinter et al. 1998; Shaw et al.
2006). The araneid Alpaida veniliae rejected prey intoxicated with herbicide for
4 days probably because of aversion (Benamu
´et al. 2010). Surprisingly, even insect
growth regulators caused reduced prey consumption in P. piratoides, but the mech-
anism is not known (Deng et al. 2008).
A more sophisticated approach to investigating sublethal effects on predation is to
study the functional response, that is, the relationship between prey capture and prey
density, as it allows two components of predation to be estimated: searching efficiency and
handling time. Only in a few studies, the functional response has been investigated.
Typically, spiders show type 2 response. In Philodromus cespitum exposure to
benzoylurea, spinosyn, and neonicotinoid reduced type 2 functional response (Fig. 31.3)
due to an increase in handling time (R
ˇeza
´c
ˇet al. 2010). In females of Hylyphantes
graminicola,preycapturewasreducedfor24hfollowing topical application of an
organophosphate, after which it changed from type 2 to type 1 response (Deng et al. 2007).
The effect on web design has been studied mainly in orb-weaving species
probably because changes to the web architecture are easier to detect and quantify
than in species constructing three-dimensional webs. Topical application of
pyrethroids dramatically reduced web frequency and size in the araneid Araneus
diadematus (Samu and Vollrath 1992). In another araneid, Larinioides sclopetarius,
application of organophosphate and organochlorine only slightly altered web archi-
tecture, but the application of pyrethroid delayed web construction and reduced its
size by more than 70 % (Lengwiler and Benz 1994). Oral application of herbicide
altered web production in terms of number of radii and spiral threads (Fig. 31.4)in
Alpaida veniliae (Benamu
´et al. 2010). Sublethal doses of spinosyn and a pyrethroid
reduced the frequency of web building in Neoscona pratensis (Benamu
´et al. 2007).
Reductions in the size of webs were also observed in the sheet-web-building
linyphiid Tenuiphantes tenuis following pyrethroid application (Shaw et al. 2005).
422 S. Peka
´r
31.3.5 Reproduction
Reproduction involves a series of processes coordinated by the nervous and hor-
monal systems, namely, mate finding, chemical or sound communication, court-
ship, mating, egg sac production, spermatogenesis/oogenesis, and brood care. All
these processes are prone to being affected particularly by neurotoxic substances,
yet evidence is scarce. Contact with surfaces treated with an organophosphate
lowered the rate of mating in Rabidocosa rabida (Tietjen 2006). In a few other
cases the inhibitory effect seems to result from reduced prey consumption prior to
Fig. 31.4 Comparison of webs produced by Alpaida veniliae in the laboratory (a) constructed
under control conditions and (b) constructed under glyphosate treatment applied orally via prey
(photos: Benamu
´)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 5 10 15 20
Prey density
No. of prey killed
control
acetamiprid
spinos ad
Fig. 31.3 Functional response curves of type 2 in Philodromus spiders and Drosophila flies
offered as prey following application of two insecticides (neonicotinoid and spinosyn) and the
control. Points are means; whiskers are standard errors of the mean
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 423
oviposition. A pyrethroid and/or organophosphates caused a reduction in egg sac
production in three linyphiids, Erigone atra,Oedothorax apicatus (Dinter et al.
1998), and Hylyphantes graminicola (Deng et al. 2006; Peng et al. 2010). Females
of Pirata piratoides produced fewer eggs and had lower fertility following insect
growth regulator application (Deng et al. 2008). Application of herbicide decreased
fecundity and fertility in Alpaida veniliae (Benamu
´et al. 2010). This was probably
the result of starvation, as the spiders refused to consume contaminated prey.
31.3.6 Development
Abnormal egg sacs and dehydrated eggs were observed in Neoscona pratensis after
spinosyn and pyrethroid applications (Benamu
´et al. 2007). Herbicide applied
through prey in Alpaida veniliae increased the number of abnormal eggs and
prolonged instar duration (Benamu
´et al. 2010). In Hylyphantes graminicola,
offspring from mothers exposed to pyrethroid took longer to develop and had
lower mass (Peng et al. 2010). Organophosphate application resulted in smaller
body size in H. graminicola (Deng et al. 2006). Whether this was a direct effect of
the formulation or an indirect effect of reduced feeding remains to be investigated.
31.3.7 Defence
Secondary defence strategies, such as escape, are based on movement abilities. In
cursorial species, reduced speed of movement would increase susceptibility to
predation. In web-building species, for example, linyphiids, spraying causes them
to leave their webs. As a result, they become more exposed to predators. Everts
et al. (1991) proved that reduced speed of movement in Oedothorax apicatus
females following contact with pyrethroid caused higher predation by carabids.
Pesticides can also interrupt signalling from kairomones produced by predators.
Spiders thus would not be able to avoid areas signalling the presence of predators.
Wrinn et al. (2012) tested whether Pardosa milvina can recognise cues from its
intraguild predators when the surface is treated with glyphosate and found that the
response to kairomones from one predator was not dramatically altered by the
herbicide but elevated to cues from another predator.
31.4 Hormesis
As outlined above, low doses or concentrations of pesticides can cause improved
performance. This could help spiders to suppress pests if the magnitude of improve-
ment was marked. Evidence for hormesis in spiders is still scarce and insufficient
chiefly because most toxicological studies have centred on higher concentrations/
424 S. Peka
´r
doses. A low dose of organophosphates stimulated predation in Hylyphantes
graminicola (Deng et al. 2007), which killed more prey (but did not consume
them), and in two lycosids, Pardosa pseudoannulata and Pardosa amentata
(Toft and Jensen 1998; Wang et al. 2006b). Detailed analysis of the functional
response revealed that it was due to an improvement in the searching efficiency
of the predator. Physiological processes are stimulated by low doses too.
Organophosphates induced, though only slightly, the hatching rate in
H. graminicola (Deng et al. 2006). When P. pseudoannulata was treated with a
low dose of an organophosphate, the protease activity increased (Wang et al.
2006a). Strangely enough, growth rate was higher and body size was larger in
Pirata piratoides after application of an insect growth regulator at LD50 than after
application at LD10 (Deng et al. 2008). The occurrence and magnitude of hormesis
in spiders thus requires additional investigation.
31.5 Conclusions
Sublethal concentrations/doses affect a variety of traits. Although evidence of
sublethal effects has been gathered for several spider species and formulations, it
is still insufficient with respect to all possible effects, species, formulations, and
concentrations/doses. Many effects—for example, on dispersal, defence, or
fecundity—are only presumed and remain to be investigated.
Due to the current development of plant protection measures towards the use of
selective chemical substances with limited direct effect on natural enemies, the
toxicology of spiders should be centred on sublethal effects. New protocols and
guidelines for risk assessment are needed to achieve fast and reliable quantification
of the effects. This should be paralleled by the detailed study of a selected agrobiont
species and estimation of the relative importance of particular life-history traits
prone to sublethal doses. For example, predation and reproduction represent two
different life-history components. Predation is a daily activity, while reproduction
usually takes place only once in a spider’s life. Thus, failure to capture prey has an
immediate effect on biological control, whereas failure to reproduce would affect
the control potential of the next generation.
What is the influence of sublethal effects at the population level? It is difficult to
estimate because the consequences of effects at physiological levels are often
unknown (Desneux et al. 2007). However, it is expected that even minor disruptions
caused by sublethal doses can render spiders ineffective for biological control and,
on a longer-term basis, can have an impact on the intrinsic rate of population
increase.
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 425
References
Baatrup E, Bayley M (1993) Effects of the pyrethroid insecticide cypermethrin on the locomotor
activity of the wolf spider Pardosa amentata: quantitative analysis employing computer-
automated video tracking. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 26:138–152
Benamu
´MA, Schneider MI, Pineda S, Sanchez NE, Gonzalez A (2007) Sublethal effects of two
neurotoxican insecticides on Araneus pratensis (Araneae: Araneidae). Commun Agric Appl
Biol Sci 72:557–559
Benamu
´MA, Schneider MI, Sa
´nchez NE (2010) Effects of the herbicide glyphosate on biological
attributes of Alpaida veniliae (Araneae, Araneidae), in laboratory. Chemosphere 78:871–876
Cunningham M, Garcia CF, Gonza
´lez-Baro
´MR, Garda H, Pollero R (2002) Organophosphorous
insecticide fenitrothion alters the lipid dynamics in the spider Polybetes pythagoricus high
density lipoproteins. Pestic Biochem Physiol 73:37–47
Deng L, Dai J, Cao H, Xu M (2006) Effects of an organophosphorous insecticide on survival,
fecundity, and development of Hylyphantes graminicola (Sundevall) (Araneae: Linyphiidae).
Environ Toxicol Chem 25:3073–3077
Deng L, Dai J, Cao H, Xu M (2007) Effects of methamidophos on the predating behavior of
Hylyphantes graminicola (Sundevall) (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Environ Toxicol Chem
26:478–482
Deng L, Xu M, Cao H, Jiayin D (2008) Ecotoxicological effects of buprofezin on fecundity,
growth, development, and predation of the wolf spider Pirata piratoides (Schenkel). Arch
Environ Contam Toxicol 55:652–658
Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech J-M (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial
arthropods. Annu Rev Entomol 525:81–106
Dinter A, Mausch H, Brauckhoff U (1998) Risk assessment for the linyphiid spiders Erigone atra
and Oedothorax apicatus and the pyrethroid Sumicide 10 resulting from laboratory
dose–response studies. IOBC Bull 21:77–87
Evans SC, Shaw EM, Rypstra AL (2010) Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicide affects
agrobiont predatory arthropod behaviour and long-term survival. Ecotoxicology 19:1249–1257
Everts JW, Willemsen I, Stulp M, Simons L, Aukema B, Kammenga J (1991) The toxic effect of
deltamethrin on linyphiid and erigonid spiders in connection with ambient temperature,
humidity, and predation. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 20:20–24
Jagers op Akkerhuis GAJM, Rossing WAH, Piet GJ, Everts JW (1997) Water depletion, an
important cause of mortality in females of the spider Oedothorax apicatus after treatment
with deltamethrin: a simulation study. Pestic Biochem Physiol 58:63–76
Jagers op Akkerhius GAJM, Westerhof R, van Straalen NM, Koeman JH (1995) Water balance,
respiration and immobilisation in relation to deltamethrin poisoning and physical conditions in
the epigeal spider Oedothorax apicatus. Pestic Sci 44:123–130
Lengwiler U, Benz G (1994) Effects of selected pesticides on web building behaviour of
Larinioides sclopetarius (Clerck) (Araneae, Araneidae). J Appl Entomol 117:99–108
Michalkova
´V, Peka
´r S (2009) How glyphosate altered the behaviour of agrobiont spiders
(Araneae: Lycosidae) and beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Biol Control 51:444–449
Nielsen SA, Toft S, Clausen J (1999) Cypermethrin effects on detoxication enzymes in active and
hibernating wolf spider (Pardosa amentata). Ecol Appl 9:463–468
Pedersen L-F, Dall LG, Soerensen BC, Mayntz D, Toft S (2002) Effects of hunger level and
nutrient balance on survival and acetylcholinesterase activity of dimethoate exposed wolf
spiders. Entomol Exp Appl 103:197–204
Peka
´r S (1999) Foraging mode: a factor affecting the susceptibility of spiders (Araneae) to
insecticide applications. Pestic Sci 55:1077–1082
Peka
´r S, Benes
ˇJ (2008) Aged pesticide residues are detrimental to agrobiont spiders (Araneae). J
Appl Entomol 132:614–622
426 S. Peka
´r
Peng Y, Shao X-L, Hose GC, Chen J (2010) Dimethoate, fenvalerate and their mixture affects
Hylyphantes graminicola (Araneae: Linyphiidae) adults and their unexposed offspring. Agric
For Entomol 12:343–351
R
ˇeza
´c
ˇM, Peka
´r S, Stara
´J (2010) The negative effect of some selective insecticides on the
functional response of a potential biological control agent, the spider Philodromus cespitum.
BioControl 55:503–510
Samu F, Vollrath F (1992) Spider orb web as bioassay for pesticide side effects. Entomol Exp Appl
62:117–124
Shaw EM, Wheater CP, Langan AM (2005) The effects of cypermethrin on Tenuiphantes tenuis
(Blackwall, 1852): development of a technique for assessing the impact of pesticides on web
building in spiders (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Acta Zool Bulg suppl 1:173–179
Shaw EM, Waddicor M, Langan AM (2006) Impact of cypermethrin on feeding behaviour and
mortality of the spider Pardosa amentata in arenas with artificial ‘vegetation’. Pest Manag Sci
62:64–68
Theiling KM, Croft BA (1988) Pesticide side-effect on arthropod natural enemies: a database
summary. Agr Ecosyst Environ 21:191–218
Tietjen WJ (2006) Pesticides affect the mating behavior of Rabidosa rabida (Araneae, Lycosidae).
J Arachnol 34:285–288
Tietjen WJ, Cady AB (2007) Sublethal exposure to a neurotoxic pesticide affects activity rhythms
and patterns of four spider species. J Arachnol 35:396–406
Toft S, Jensen AP (1998) No negative sublethal effects of two insecticides on prey capture and
development of a spider. Pestic Sci 52:223–228
Van Erp S, Booth L, Gooneratne R, O’Halloran K (2002) Sublethal responses of wolf spiders
(Lycosidae) to organophosphorous insecticides. Environ Toxicol 17:449–456
Wang Z, Song D-X, Fu X-Q, Li Y-L (2006a) Effect of methamidophos on midgut proteinase
activity in the wolf spider, Pardosa pseudoannulata (Araneae: Lycosidae) assayed with
piezoelectric bulk acoustic wave impedance analysis method. Acta Entomol Sin 49:700–704
Wang Z, Song D-X, Zhu M-S (2006b) Functional response and searching behavior to the brown
planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens by the wolf spider, Pardosa pseudoannulata under low dose
chemical pesticides. Acta Entomol Sin 49:295–301
Widiarta IN, Matsumura M, Suzuki Y, Nakasuji F (2001) Effects of sublethal doses of
imidacloprid on the fecundity of green leafhoppers, Nephotettix spp. (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)
and their natural enemies. Appl Entomol Zool 36:501–507
Wrinn KM, Evans SC, Rypstra AL (2012) Predator cues and an herbicide affect activity and
emigration in an agrobiont wolf spider. Chemosphere 87(4):390–396. doi:10.1016/j.
chemosphere.2011.12.030
31 Side Effect of Synthetic Pesticides on Spiders 427