Available via license: CC BY 4.0
Content may be subject to copyright.
How to cite this article:
Lone IM, Baba MA, Shah MM, Iqbal A and Sakina A (2013) Seroprevalence of brucellosis in sheep of organized and
unorganized sector of Kashmir valley, Vet World 6(8): 530-533, doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.530-533
Introduction seasonal, reaching a peak usually after kidding and
lambing [9].
Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonotic infection and is Brucella melitensis is considered to be the most
amongst the most important diseases, in terms of loss to important cause of abortion, reduced fertility,
economy that affects sheep and goat population in the increased neonatal losses and leads to emergency
developing countries [1,2]. It is a contagious disease slaughtering of the infected animals [10]. Ovine and
caused by bacteria of genus Brucella.. Nine Brucella caprine brucellosis due to B.melitensis is widespread in
species are currently recognized, seven of these that the country [11, 12] and is considered to be the most
affect terrestrial animals : B. abortus, B. melitensis, B. important disease due to its economic impact where it
suis, B. ovis, B. canis, B. neotomae, and B. microti has an adverse effect on total animal protein supplies,
[3,4,5]. Five out of the nine known Brucella species can and severe hazard it represents to human health [13]. It
infect humans and the most pathogenic and invasive has been reported in different countries in Asia
species for human is B. melitensis, followed in including Pakistan [14], Sri Lanka [15], India [16],
descending order by B. suis, B. abortus and B. canis China [17], Mongolia [18] and other parts of Asia [19].
[6]. In places where brucellosis is endemic, humans There are about 500,000 new human cases of
can get infected via contact with infected animals or brucellosis reported annually worldwide making it the
consumption of their products, mostly milk and milk commonest zoonosis [5].
products especially cheese made from unpasteurized Sheep brucellosis can be divided into classical
milk of sheep and goats and rennet from infected lambs brucellosis and ram epididymitis. Ram epididymitis is
and kids. Some specific occupational groups including caused by non-zoonotic agent B. ovis, while classical
farm workers, veterinarians, ranchers, and meat- brucellosis is caused by B. melitensis and constitutes a
packing employees are considered at higher risk [7]. B. major public health threat equal to goat brucellosis [6].
abortus and B. suis infections usually affect Besides the abortion, swine may also develop orchitis,
occupational groups, while B. melitensis infections lameness, hind limb paralysis, or spondylitis;
occur more frequently than the other Brucella species occasionally, metritis or abscesses [20].
in the general population [6, 8]. Consumption of sheep Brucellosis has been emerging as a serious
or goat milk containing B. melitensis is an important concern in last few years in Jammu and Kashmir and
source of human brucellosis worldwide and has caused therefore this study was undertaken. The main
several outbreaks. For example; in some countries objective of this study was to screen out livestock in
including Italy, 99% of human brucellosis is caused by farms, Units established under different scheme and
B. melitensis [8]. The prevalence of human brucellosis many private farms including all flocks from where
acquired from dairy products in some countries is abortions that proves positive on Rose Bengal Plate test
(RBPT).
Keeping in view, the above facts, this serological
survey of brucellosis through RBPT and Standard Tube
www.veterinaryworld.org 530
doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.530-533
Seroprevalence of brucellosis in sheep of organized and unorganized
sector of Kashmir valley
Iram Mushtaq Lone, M. Ashraf Baba, M. Maroof Shah, Asif Iqbal and Aabeen Sakina
Disease Investigation Laboratory,
Nowshera, Srinagar, Department of Sheep Husbandry, Kashmir, J & K, India
Corresponding author: email:irammushtaq13@gmail.com
Received: 28-03-2013, Revised: 12-04-2013, Accepted: 14-04-2013, Published online: 24-05-2013
Iram Mushtaq Lone
Abstract
Aim: A seroprevalence study of brucellosis in sheep was conducted from April 2010 to April 2012 from both organized and
unorganized sectors of the Kashmir valley.
Materials and Methods: A total of 6615 sera samples were tested by Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT) and Standard Tube
Agglutination Test (STAT).
Results: The overall seropositivity revealed 6.50 % of prevalence of brucellosis. Higher prevalence (14.14%) of brucellosis
was recorded in unorganized sector as compared organized sector (3.23%).
Keywords: brucellosis, Kashmir, seroprevalence, sheep
This article is an open access article licensed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.
org/licenses/by/2.0) which permits unrestricted use, distribution
and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
www.veterinaryworld.org 531
doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.530-533
Agglutination Test (STAT) in sheep kept at various antigen obtained from IVRI, Izatnagar was used for the
government and private farms in Kashmir valley has test. As per the guidelines, the sera from animals
been described, to assess the current status of the positive by RBPT and SAT, and showing 40 IU/ml or
disease in the region. above titre were considered as positive, whereas 20
IU/ml was considered as doubtful.
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
The study was carried out through the period from
April, 2010 to April, 2012 on different Government Sera of 6615 sheep were analyzed and the
sheep breeding farms and field organizations prevalence of brucellosis was recorded by RBPT and
representing Kashmir valley. Though the samples from STAT. The overall prevalence of brucellosis recorded
Brucella hot spots were initially received in greater in sheep was 6.50%. Similar prevalence was earlier
quantity, randomization of sample was done by reported [22, 23, 24, 25]. However higher prevalence
collecting samples from widely spaced villages and of brucellosis was recorded elsewhere [26, 27]. This
from different breeders and flocks of different districts. may be due to variation in the environment, sex, age,
Samples from north, south, eastern and western parts of breed and other factors.
Kashmir valley were taken mostly from units In this study, the prevalence of brucellosis was
established by the Department (Figure-1). As the units recorded higher (14.14%) in unorganized sector as to
are widely separated and in different districts they are compared (3.23%) organized sector (Table 1 and 2).
largely represent general picture though it can't be The findings are in the agreement with earlier
claimed that the present study is quite exhaustive. It observation [25]. The lesser incidence of the organized
needs to be supplemented by further studies especially sector may be due to good and controlled managemental
screening of herds, instead of only a group of animals, practices and screening of male animals for brucellosis
as brucellosis is a herd problem and may be confined to before letting them for breeding. The findings of the
particular pockets. The fact that the study is based on present study suggest that Brucella infection may also
two year time further randomizes our sample as be present in the native sheep of the valley. To prevent
unnoticed cases often result in quick horizontal spread this, regular screening of the newly introduced rams for
and within two year, the flock is expected to show crossbreeding should be carried out.
evidence of infections. A total of 6615 sheep serum The prevalence of brucellosis at Govt. sheep
samples were randomly collected from both organized farms varied from 0.83% at Dachigham to 7.23% at
and unorganized farms through out Kashmir valley. Kewa, while as in the unorganized (field organizations)
Serum samples were collected from a total of five sector the prevalence rate varied from 4.87% in district
established Government breeding farms (4635) from Budgam to 19.81% in district Shopian (district
organized sector having mainly crossbred population Pulwama and Kupwara were not considered as the
as well as from all the eight district extension samples were less than 100). Increased prevalence in
organizations (1980) of the valley. Serum samples unorganized sector is attributable to certain hot spots
were tested by Rose Bengal Plate test (RBPT) and where brucellosis had affected huge percentage of
Standard Tube Agglutination Test (STAT)" employing animals in the flocks screened. Amongst the
standard procedures [21] (Figure-2). B. abortus plain government sponsored units in the districts only two
Figure-1. Map showing brucellosis affected areas of kashmir valley
Figure-2. RBPT negative (left) and
positive (right)
www.veterinaryworld.org 532
doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.530-533
showed significant presence of brucellosis. It was appropriate diagnostic laboratories on the basis of
assumed that herds from which no reports of abortions adopted standards of the OIE, bringing appropriate
came in last three years were free from it but for studies veterinary legislation and animal health policies, is also
a few small herds (consisting of more than 20 animals) important. Farmers need to be compensated for
too were screened fully. Thus our consideration of data brucella positive animals so that cull and slaughter
from fully affected herds doesn't affect our sampling policy could be implemented and significant control
fairness as we took highly affected, completely achieved. There is a need for systematic control
unaffected and little affected herds that had reportedly programme that should involve large scale testing,
suffered a case or two of abortion in last three years. As culling, implementation of controlled breeding
the source of infection is often a ram which may pick up strategies and lastly vaccination. The need for work on
infection anywhere in the field and not necessarily indigenous vaccine is also strongly felt as part of long
from the farms from which it is supplied, tested against term control policy.
brucellosis before releasing for breeding in the field, Authors’ contribution
we can attribute the relatively higher percentage in All authors contributed equally in planning and
certain selected districts to infected rams that have designing the study, collection of samples from field
escaped detection. Absence of strict cull and slaughter and farms, analysis of samples in laboratory and
policy has compelled breeders to retain infected compilation of data. All authors were involved in
animals or sell to others as there is no compensation to drafting, revision and approval of the final manuscript.
farmers presently available if they decide to cull
infected animals. The question of pattern of prevalence Acknowledgments
of brucellosis needs further study. The authors are grateful to the Deputy Director,
Conclusion Research and Director, Sheep Husbandry Kashmir, for
providing fund and necessary facilities for this study.
Our results could make a useful contribution
towards preventing brucellosis in small ruminants and Competing interests
decreasing losses in the livestock industry. More The authors declare that they have no competing interest.
attention should be paid towards implementing a
proper control program for brucellosis and more efforts References
should be directed towards improving the animal 1. Bernues, A. E. Manrique and Maza, 1997) Economic
health biosecurity program in those governorates that evaluation of bovine brucellosis and tuberculosis eradication
are large in size. Progress in control should be monitored programme in a mountain area of Spain. Pre. Vet. Med. 30:
serologically and evaluated epidemiologically. Veterinary 137-149.
2. Dijkhuizen, A. A., Hurine R. B. M. and Jalvingh, A. W.
extension should play a major role to guarantee the (1995) Economic analysis of animal disease and their
application of the sanitary procedures and measures in control. Prev. Vet. Med. 25: 135-149.
rearing, raising and breeding places, education of 3. Scholz, H. C., Hubalek, Z., Sedlacek, I., Vergnaud, G.,
personnel and dissemination of awareness as well as Tomaso, H., Al Dahouk, S., Melzer, F., Kampfer, P.,
Neubauer, H., Cloeckaert, A., Maquart, M., Zygmunt, M.S.,
veterinary public health through various media. Whatmore, A.M., Falsen, E., Bahn, P., Gollner, C., Pfeffer,
Recommendations M., Huber, B., Busse, H. J. and Nockler, K. (2008) Brucella
microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole Microtus
Apart from capacity building and training for arvalis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58, 375–382.
improving the quality of the veterinary services and 4. Scholz, H. C., Nockler, K., Gollner, C., Bahn, P., Vergnaud,
M.T. (
Table-1. Brucellosis picture from received and randomly collected samples (April 2010-April 2012)
Sr. No District Total no. of samples Samples positive % prevalence
1 Srinagar 438 80 18.26
2 Budgam 246 12 4.87
3 Ganderbal 458 72 15.72
4 Baramulla 184 35 19.02
5 Kulgam 130 7 5.38
6 Shopian 106 21 19.81
7 Anatnag 136 12 8.80
8 Bandipora 282 41 14.53
Total 1980 280 14.14
Table-2. Brucellosis results of organized farms (April 2010-April 2012)
Sr. No Name of farm Total no. of samples Samples positive % prevalence
1 Goabal 780 29 3.71
2 Dachigam 477 4 0.83
3 Kralpathri 1060 43 4.05
4 Daksum 1945 47 2.41
5 Kewa 373 27 7.23
Total 4635 150 3.23
www.veterinaryworld.org 533
doi:10.5455/vetworld.2013.530-533
G., Tomaso, H., Al Dahouk, S., Kampfer P., Cloeckaert, A., Brucella abortus in aborted cattle and buffaloes herd in Sri
Maquart, M., Zygmunt, M.S., Whatmore, A.M., Pfeffer, M., Lanka. Vet. World, 4: 542-545. Doi: 10.5455/vetworld. 2011.
Huber, B., Busse, H. J. and De, B. K. (2010) Brucella 542-545.
inopinata sp. nov., isolated from a breast implant infection. 16. Ghodasara, S. N., Roy, A. and Bhanderi, B. B. (2010)
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 60: 801-808. doi: ijs.0.011148-0. Comparison of Rose Bengal Plate Agglutination, Standard
5. Seleem, M. N., Boyle, S. M. and Sriranganathan, N (2010) tube agglutination and Indirect ELISA tests for detection of
Brucellosis:Are-emerging zoonosis. Veterinary Microbiology, Brucella antibodies in Cows and Buffaloes. Vet. World, 3:
140: 392-398. Doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic. 2009.06.021. 61-64.
6. Acha, N. P. and Szyfres, B. (2003) Zoonoses and 17. Deqiu, S., Donglou, X. and Jiming, Y. (2002) Epidemiology
Communicable Diseases Common to Man and Animals, and control of brucellosis in China Veterinary Microbiology,
3rd ed., vol. 1. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), 90: 165-182.
Washington, DC. 18. Zinsstag, J., Roth, F., Orkhon, D., Chimed-Ochir, G.,
7. Tabak, F., Hakko, E., Mete, B., Ozaras, R., Mert, A. and Nansalmaa, M., Kolar, J. and Vounatsou, P. (2005) A model
Ozturk, R. (2008) Is family screening necessary in of animal-human brucellosis transmission in Mongolia.
brucellosis? Infection 36, 575–577. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 69: 77-95. Doi: 10.1016/j.
8. De Massis, F., Di Girolamo, A., Petrini, A., Pizzigallo, E. and prevetmed.2005.01.017.
Giovannini, A. (2005) Correlation between animal and 19. Pappas, G., Papadimitriou, P., Akritidis, N., Christou, L., and
human brucellosis in Italy during the period 1997–2002. Tsianos, E. V. (2006) The new global map of human
Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 11, 632–636. brucellosis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 6(2): 91-99.
9. Dahouk, S. A., Neubauer, H., Hensel, A., Schoneberg, I., 20. Glynn, M.K. and Lynn, T. V. (2008) Brucellosis. J. Am. Vet.
Nockler, K., Alpers, K., Merzenich, H., Stark, K. and Jansen, Med. Assoc. 233, 900–908.
A., (2007) Changing epidemiology of human brucellosis, 21. Alton, G. G., Jones, L. M. and Pietz, D. E. (1975) Laboratory
Germany, 1962–2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 13, 1895–1900. Techniques in Brucellosis, World Health Organisation
10. Abdul-Aziz, N and Shenkel, F. (1990) Brucellosis in small monograph series No. 454, Geneva.
ruminants in Jordan. In: Schenkel. Weiland (Eds). 22. Sharma, V. D., Sethi, M. S., Yadav, M. P. and Dubey, D. C.
Proceedings of the Conference on Economically Significant (1979) Sero-epidemiologic investigations on brucellosis in
Reproductive Disorders in Small Ruminants, Amman. the states of Uttar Pradesh (U.P.) and Delhi (India). Int. J.
Jordan. 6-10 May 1990. Zoonoses, 6: 75-81.
11. Das, T. P. and Dutta, S. N. (1961) Incidence of Brucella 23. Memish, Z. (2001) Brucellosis control in Saudi Arabia:
reactors among goats and sheep in Orissa. Indian Vet. J., 38: prospects and challenges. J. Chemother., 13: 11–17.
547-550. 24. Sonawane, G. G., Ttripathi, S. and Dubey S. C. (2011) Sero-
12. Ghosh, S. S and Verma, P. C. (1985) Incidences of incidence of brucellosis in small ruminants of semiarid
Brucellosis in sheep and goats in Nagaland. Indian Vet. J., 62: Rajasthan. The Indian J of Anim Sci. 81(4): 327-329.
339-340. 25. Bandey, S. D., Parvez, S. and Bandey, S. (1989) Sero-
13. Abeer, H. A., Shawkat, Q. L., and Al-Tarazi, Yasser (2003) epidemiological studies on brucellosis in exotic sheep in
Epidemiology of ovine brucellosis in Awassi sheep in Kashmir valley. Indian J Anim Sci; 59: 213-15.
northern Jordan. Prev. Vet. Med., 60: 297-306. 26. Al-Ani, F. K., Al-Sharrifi, M. and F. Khalil (1998) Serological
14. Akhtar, R., Chaudhry, P. Z. I., Shakoori, P. A. R., Ahmad, M. survey on camel brucellosis in Iraq. Camel Newslett, 14:
U. D. and Aslam, A. (2010) Comparative efficacy of 32–33.
conventional diagnostic methods and evaluation of 27. Hawari, A. D. (2012) Epidemiological Studies, Sero-
polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of bovine prevalence and some risk factors of brucellosis in Sheep and
brucellosis. Vet. World, 3: 53-56. Goats in the South Province of West Bank. Asian Journal of
15. Priyantha, M. A. R. (2011) Identification of biovars of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7:535-539.
********