ArticlePDF Available

Poverty Reduction Policies in Malaysia: Trends, Strategies and Challenges

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Malaysia is a multi-ethnic religious country with a population of 28.5 million, it is characterised by mainly three ethnic groups-Malay and indigenous people, Chinese, and Indians. Ever since independence in 1957, Malaysia has successfully transformed itself from a poor country into a middle-income nation. The Malaysian economy has seen a periodic growth despite challenging external factors. It can also definitely claim its success of combat against poverty. Despite its poverty reduction success, there still remains a vulnerable group of people in the country experiencing poverty for some geographical and societal reasons. This concept paper has several objectives: A brief description of the country's nature of poverty, poverty reduction policies and programs, and an analysis facing the challenges and recommendations for a sustainable poverty reduction in Malaysia.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Asian Culture and History; Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
ISSN 1916-9655 E-ISSN 1916-9663
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
48
Poverty Reduction Policies in Malaysia: Trends, Strategies and
Challenges
Zulkarnain A. Hatta1 & Isahaque Ali1
1 School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
Correspondence: Zulkarnain A. Hatta, School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia. E-mail:
ialisw@yahoo.com
Received: December 5, 2012 Accepted: February 6, 2013 Online Published: March 8, 2013
doi:10.5539/ach.v5n2p48 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ach.v5n2p48
Abstract
Malaysia is a multi-ethnic religious country with a population of 28.5 million, it is characterised by mainly three
ethnic groups-Malay and indigenous people, Chinese, and Indians. Ever since independence in 1957, Malaysia
has successfully transformed itself from a poor country into a middle-income nation. The Malaysian economy
has seen a periodic growth despite challenging external factors. It can also definitely claim its success of combat
against poverty. Despite its poverty reduction success, there still remains a vulnerable group of people in the
country experiencing poverty for some geographical and societal reasons. This concept paper has several
objectives: A brief description of the country’s nature of poverty, poverty reduction policies and programs, and
an analysis facing the challenges and recommendations for a sustainable poverty reduction in Malaysia.
Keywords: Malaysia, poverty, policy, challenges
1. Introduction
Defining poverty conceptually is easier as opposed to operational definition. Poverty is perceived as an
amalgamation of various aspects which exceeds the argument on lack of income and not confined to a
single-faceted phenomenon. The term poverty refers to different adverse social and psychological repercussions
namely domestic violence, crime, perceived inadequacy of social investments and problems in expansion of
human capital, unfair service delivery and feeble political participation. Hence, the definition of poverty is
ultimately country specific.
Universally, poverty is normally referred to failed income “dollar-a-day” by World Bank. However, for country
specific purposes it is standard recommended practice to use national poverty lines where there exist. Most
countries adopted this practice in the 2005 Millennium Development Goal report (United Nations, 2011).
Malaysia developed its own poverty line in the 1970s when the government’s national policy gave a high priority
for poverty eradication. The government utilized this poverty line on assessments of the minimum consumption
requirements of an average sized household for food, shelter, clothing and other non-food needs.
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Malaysia contracted to US$156.53 billion in 2007 and US$278.7 billion
in 201, and the GDP growth was 5.7% and 4.7% respectively. The GDP per capita in Malaysia was last reported
at US$7.760 in 2007 and US$5,364.5 in 2011. The Gross Domestic Product (PPP) in Malaysia was reported at
US$13,740.93 in 2007 and US$14,730.93 in 2011.The unemployment rate in Malaysia was 3.2% in 2007 and 3%
in 2011 (Department of Statistics in Malaysia, 2011).
2. Definition of Poverty in Malaysia
Adjustments were made to the poverty line in its earliest form, for differences in mean household size and cost
of living among the three main regions of Malaysia-Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak. No adjustments
were made for rural or urban location. This resulted in three regional poverty lines (besides the national one).
These poverty lines, with adjustments for inflation and changing mean household sizes, were in use from their
adoption in 1976 to 2004.
Although the poverty line was defined by consumption, poverty status was determined with reference to gross
household income rather than expenditure. Thus, households with income below the poverty line were defined as
living in poverty, and those with incomes below half the poverty line as living in “hard-core” or extreme poverty.
In 2004, a revision was done to the poverty line. The revised poverty line now defined for each household and
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
49
averaged to each state and rural or urban location, taking into account relative costs of living, household
composition and size. This new poverty line also defines extreme deprivation or hard-core poverty as household
with incomes below their food poverty line or households unable to meet their minimum food needs. In 2009,
the mean national poverty line translated to an unadjusted RM6.50 per capita a day (equivalent to US$3.00 a day,
PPP).
Currently there are revised and separate Poverty Line Income (PLI) for each state in the country. The revised
version takes into account different household size, a separate classification based on the urban and rural areas.
Basic characteristics of each household considered for measuring the PLI, which includes number of occupants
and its locality and demographic aspects. To characterize the poverty line income of Malaysia, presently, the level
of minimum expenditure that is essential to lead a reasonable life is taken into consideration and Consumer Price
Index (CPI) is utilized to update PLI every year. To reveal the disparity of cost of living and size of household
between the Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak, two different PLIs were adopted. Tables 1 and 2 showed
that PLI was decided for Peninsular Malaysia to be 4.1 at RM763 (US$254) and Sabah and Sarawak to be 4.9 at
RM912 (US$304) per month, respectively, as per 9th Malaysia Plan.
The half of the PLI was set as the absolute hardcore poverty line (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2010).
Table 1. Poverty line in Malaysia
2010
Poverty Line Peninsular
Malaysia
Sabah and
Labuan
Sarawak Malaysia
Incidence of Poverty1 (%) 2.0 19.2 5.3 3.8
No of Poor Households
(`000)
102.2 99.1 27.1 228.4
Mean PLI (RM monthly) 763 (US$254) 1,048 (US$349) 912 (US$304) 800 (US$266)
Mean Per Capita PLI 2
(RM monthly)
194 (US$64)
225 (US$75) 208 (US$70) 198 (US$64)
Source: Economic Planning Unit and Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2010.
Note: 1 Refers to households with mean monthly gross income below its mean PLI.
Note: 2 Due to varying household sizes, the per capita PLI will be used by implementing agencies to identify the
target groups.
Table 2. Poverty line in Malaysia by mean household size 2010
Poverty Line Peninsular Malaysia Sabah and Labuan Sarawak Malaysia
National 4.1 4.9 4.5 4.2
Urban 4.0 4.8 4.6 4.1
Rural 4.4 5.0 4.5 4.5
Poor 6.4 6.5 6.2 6.4
Source: Economic Planning Unit and Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2010.
Malaysia tremendously succeeded in combat against poverty. As of 1970, the poverty level was 49.3% and it was
lessened to 8.1 in 1999. In the year of 2000, it was optimally reduced as 5.5%. The strategy which was employed
for reducing poverty led to accommodate an effective poverty reduction enclosure and fast economic growth with
a constant improvement of its micro economy (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2011). Hardcore poverty was
reduced from 1.2% in 2004 to 0.7% in 2009 and the incidence of overall poverty fell from 5.7% in 2004 to 3.8%
in 2009. The overall poverty rate is 3.7% in Malaysia (Department of Statistics Malaysia, 2011).
Table 3 showed that between these two regions a disparity was observed in the incident of poverty. Compared to
Sabah and Sarawak, in Peninsular Malaysia, IOP was lower to some extent. In 1976, it was reportedly at 58.3%
and 56.5%, respectively. This condition could be a positive outcome of rapid development initiatives implemented
in Peninsular Malaysia. Yet, programs had robustly been executed in Sabah and Sarawak to combat poverty. The
IOP that was reported as 51.2% and 51.7% in 1976 was minimized to 16.0% and 5.8% respectively in 2002.
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
50
The New Economic Policy and the National Development Plan have emphasized only the Bumiputera (Sons of
the Soil) communities in Sabah. Part of the problem lies with the tendency of policy makers to classify
Bumiputera as homogenous resulting in government policies that are not neutral rather than targeted. However,
the programs did not have the same impact on all Bumiputera groups irrespective of their ethnic background for
poverty reduction. This effect is most evident in official statistics where the economically disadvantaged
Bumiputera communities are classified as Bumiputera together with the more economically advanced Malays.
Past government’s policies aimed at eradicating poverty, restructuring employment and equity have produced
limited impact on the Bumiputera communities. The development of human capital in Sabah is still in lacking, as
seen from the large untrained population especially those from the rural districts, and much needed good
governance.
Due to a country wide steady decline of IOP, a proactive development was unrealistic and poverty remained
relatively moderate in Kedah, Kelantan and Perlis. The IOP was found to be intensive in Kelantan and in 1976; this
was acknowledged as the highest rate of IOP (67.1%) in Malaysia. This disparity remained to be constant as 10.6%
in 2004 and 4.8% in 2009. The occurrence of poverty in Selangor and Wilayah Persekutuan states was
comparatively low and had been reportedly lower than 10.0% since 1984 (Mat Zin, 2011).
Table 3. Poverty incident in Malaysia by state from 1970-2009 (in percentage)
State 1970 1976 1985 1990 1997 1999 2002 2004 2007 2009
Johor 45.7 29.0 12.2 9.8 1.6 2.5 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.3
Kedah 63.2 61.6 36.6 29.9 11.5 13.5 10.7 7.0 3.1 5.3
Kelantan 76.1 67.1 39.2 29.6 19.2 18.5 12.4 10.6 7.2 4.8
Melaka 44.9 32.4 15.8 12.4 3.5 5.7 2.7 1.8 1.8 0.5
N. Sembilan 44.8 33.0 13.0 9.1 4.7 2.5 2.2 1.4 1.3 0.7
Pahang 43.2 38.9 15.7 10.0 4.4 5.5 3.8 4.0 1.7 2.1
Perak 48.6 43.0 20.3 19.2 4.5 9.5 7.9 4.9 3.4 3.5
Perlis 73.9 59.8 33.7 17.4 10.7 13.3 10.1 6.3 7.0 6.0
Palau Pinang 43.7 32.4 13.4 8.7 1.7 2.7 1.4 0.3 1.4 1.2
Selangor 29.2 22.9 8.6 7.6 1.3 2.0 1.1 1.0 0.7 0.7
Terengganu 68.9 60.3 28.9 31.3 17.3 14.9 10.7 15.4 6.5 4.0
Sabah - 58.3 33.1 34.3 16.5 20.1 16.0 24.2 16.4 19.7
Sarawak - 56.5 31.9 21.0 7.3 6.7 5.8 7.5 4.2 5.3
W.P.KL - 9.0 4.9 3.7 0.1 2.3 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.7
W.P Labuan - - - - - - - 2.7 4.2 3.8
Malaysia 49.3 - 20.7 16.5 6.1 7.5 5.1 5.7 3.6 3.8
Source: Mat Zain, 2011
3. Poverty Reduction Programs in Malaysia
Despite the successes in reducing poverty (less than 4%), there are vulnerable sections of the population remain
unchanged due to several disadvantaged circumstances. In the effort to develop a more inclusive approach, the
economic development model is being pursued. Capacity building in Malaysia in the context of alleviation of
socio-economic inequalities is being implemented by expanding the economy, and at the same time giving
subsidies to the needy. In pursuing inclusiveness, the approach is anchored on two objectives: i) Enabling
equitable opportunities for all, and ii) Providing a social safety net for the disadvantaged groups. For the second
objective, equitable access to health, education and basic infrastructure are being emphasized. Mechanisms for
targeted income support will be enhanced as general subsidies are being phased out. Two features of social
policy that distinguish Malaysia from other countries are:
a. Social policies have had an orderly and incremental development owing to a supportive environment
within a lengthy and continuous period of stability, which is unlike the experience of many developing
countries, and
b. A succession of strong governments and a public sector committed to improve the welfare and
well-being of all Malaysians.
The evolution of the social policy and welfare regime and its significance for poverty eradication in the 50-year
span from 1957 to the present may be analyzed according to four different phases, namely, 1957-1980, the
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
51
Mahathir regime of 1981-1997, financial crisis period of 1998-2002, and the post-2003 regime under Prime
Minister Abdullah Badawi. A summary of the evolution is shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Evolution of Welfare Regime Since 1957
Source: Mohd, 2012
The strategies devised in Malaysia to mitigate poverty took on several important fronts. A combination of
continued welfarism and a new drive towards independent living were incorporated in the strategy. Hence,
improved capacity building was enhanced and new programs were introduced in order to take care of the
vulnerable or the so called bottom million of society. The following sectors were given high priority:
Advancing agricultural sector
Strengthening small medium enterprises
Improving welfare of student
Strengthening pre-school education
Improving literacy and numeracy
Creating quality school
Increasing home ownership
Expanding public health facilities
Enhancing social safety nets
Improving retirement scheme
Microfinance
4. Challenges for Poverty Reduction in Malaysia
Although the country has done a commendable job in eradicating poverty, nevertheless, there are significant
challenges in the era of globalization. The following are important issues which need attention as the country
faces a new category of new poor.
4.1 Migrants Workers’ Issues
The current development policies of Malaysia are highly influenced by globalisation and liberalization, and this
leads to direct and indirect implications on activities in relation to poverty. Contraction in employment
opportunities drastically affects the urban poor, the near poor, migrant workers. A high prevalence of
unemployment and retrenchment are also acknowledged by relevant authorities. There is a huge demand for
knowledgeable and skilled human resources in capital intensive and high value added activities, since Malaysia
restructuring its economy.
Rigorous social policies
1981-1997
1957-1980 1998-2002 2003-present
Narrow ‘welfare-state’ style policies
NEP (1970)
Broader ‘welfare-state’ style policies
Public health programmes
Free education
Unemployment benefit
State pension / EPF
Income support
Land reforms
FELDA, FELCRA, IADP
Poverty eradication (rural)
Combat poverty
Target Hardcore poor
NGOs Involvement
Microcredit - AIM
Private Involvement
Privatisation
Moderate government expenditure
Financial Crisis: Effects ‘National Social Welfare
Ministry of Women, Family and
Community Development
Impact on the poor
Inadequate social protection
plans
Agriculture Productivity
Zero-poverty target
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
52
An increased influx of overseas employees also aggravated the IOP in the post world repercussion of 2008. This
phenomenon induced a deliberate discussion in relation to the foreign labor policy for various reasons. The
contribution of overseas employees for local economy, remittance for their country origin, perceived competition
in the local labor market between local and migrant workers and the potential arrival of appalling amount of
overseas labors attributed to severe unrest all turned pressing concerns. Nair (2010) is also concerned about this
issue and stated “the increased invasion of (20%) of foreign labour force makes an impact on poverty issues and
human resource development”.
4.2 Ethnic Issues
The educational achievements of Bumiputera and rural students in disciplines which are very much fundamental to
the economy was considerably lower than the urban and non Bumiputera students. This led to an academic lacuna
between these two sectors. If the policy makers are turned a blind eye to the injustices and refuse to create
promising arrangements, fragmentations, factions would be unavoidable and turmoil between ethnic groups would
become worse. Hence, the perceived gap between poor and non poor will be widened.
The Malays are dominant in the rural poverty and this initiated policy makers to figure out the national level
conceptualisation of poverty. The National Economic Plan 2010 (NEP) poverty eradication mainly focussed on
Malay rural population, and the policies and initiatives turned ethnically motivated.
4.3 Rural and Urban Poor
Since, more than half of the family units in the rural area being categorized as poor, rural and urban poor poverty
have constantly been identified as a problem confined to rural. However, the consequences of poverty are
devastating among urban communities as a vast proportion of new poor family units are settled in urban settings
(Nair, 2010). Innovative policies and strategies should be implemented with strong commitment in programs
planning and inner city development expenditure allocation are required (Nair, 2010). Rural and urban migration
combined with the influx of foreign regulated and unregulated migrants dramatically increased the urban poverty
(Economic & Planning Unit, Malaysia, 2010).
4.4 Poverty Line Income Issues
Poverty Line Income Issues are constantly discussed by absolute and relative terms with an idea that poverty
alleviation initiatives to be more goals directed and challenges that intensified poverty had to be optimally tackled.
It’s also observed that views on relative poverty have been changing over time. While in the past the bottom 40%
of the population was defined to be in relative poverty, it is the bottom 30% of the population under the current
plan. However, there is an ambiguity behind the redefinition of relative poverty from the bottom 40% of the
population to 30%. This kind of temporary adjustment of definition on relative poverty makes comparisons
difficult.
The selection criterion for financial assistance has been set as of RM1200 that is 2.3 times more than the PLI of
Peninsular Malaysia (Nair, 2010). Even though a financial support is being provided with the selected
households, it seems more support is needed to be given in order to promote their living standard. Therefore, the
efficacy of the current PLIs which is used to differentiate the poor households from the non-poor should be
revisited.
Conversely, it is not clear as to which income level is to be used to define the inclusion criteria of the households
to be selected for the provision of financial and other forms of support.
According the government of Malaysia, if a household earn of (four persons) RM900 (US$300), RM1,
000 (US$333.34) or even RM1500 (US$500) a month, they cannot be considered as poor. Therefore,
the families and more media reports complaining that they cannot meet their basic needs even they earn
RM2, 000(US$666.67). Here, the government how will calculate the poverty line.
The World Bank standard recommends that medium-income countries should calculate PLI based on
US$2 (RM6.20) per individual per day. Meaning one person would need US$2 per day in order to meet
both food and non-food necessities if that figure is used for Malaysia a theoretical household of 4.4
people will need RM858 a month to not be declared poor. Here PLI is not correct.
In Australia and Britain, median income of households is applied to define PLIs. The median income of
a country is calculated by dividing its income into half. The PLI is two-thirds of the median income.
Using the Malaysian median income which is RM2,830 (US$944), the PLI would be set as
RM1,886(US$629)
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
53
The government considers a household as comprising an average of 4.4 members (Total number of
households divided by total population = 4.4). The PLI of monthly RM763 (US$254), therefore, is
translated into a daily income of RM25.45 (US$8.50) that a household needs to meet the eight
components such as food, rent, clothing and fuel and so on. Therefore, it is impossible to meet basic needs
by this small amount of money.
4.5 Climate Change Issues
Climate change is a global issue with significant implications for Malaysia. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from fuel
combustion and deforestation activities contributes to global warming and has caused a shift in the climate
system. Malaysia will have to adopt a dual strategy in addressing climate change impacts: Firstly, adaptation
strategies to protect economic growth and development factors from the impact of climate change; and secondly,
mitigation strategies to reduce emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) (Economic & Planning Unit, Malaysia,
2010).
5. Analysis
Since independence in 1957, Malaysia has successfully transformed itself from a poor country to a
middle-income country. The incidence of poverty has been drastically reduced from 49.3% in 1970 to only 3.8%
in 2010, with hardcore poverty nearly eradicated, declining to 0.7% in 2009 (Abidin & Rasiah, 2009).
Malaysia’s real GDP has grown by an average of 5.8% per annum from 1991 to 2010. This growth rate has
helped improve the quality of life for Malaysians and supported widespread advances in education, health,
infrastructure, housing and public amenities. Though the growth momentum has recently slowed down due to the
global economic and financial crisis, public spending through the two economic stimulus packages and
accommodative monetary policy have helped the nation recover.
Malaysia can effectively declare victory in its fight against poverty. Nevertheless, pockets of poverty remain
both in terms of specific geographies and particular communities. The government remains committed to
transmitting assistance and welfare to the poor and vulnerable. Special programs are being undertaken to address
poverty on a sustainable basis, especially in terms of providing income generating opportunities, such as through
agro projects. Since the face of poverty is no longer purely a rural phenomenon, specific interventions will also
be targeted towards the urban poor, such as through micro credit schemes.
The authorities have to expand programs involving practical on-the-job training (vocational and internship) that
are relevant to the market. Internships, soft-skill training and job placement initiatives will be targeted towards
unemployed graduates. The premise behind lifelong learning programs must be the expansion of distance
learning, e-learning, retraining and skills-upgrading offered by various institutions. At the local level, community
colleges assumed a greater role in implementing retraining and skills-upgrading programmes (Abidin & Rasiah,
2009).
With the labor force increasing by 1.7% per annum during the period of 2006 to 2009, the unemployment rate
increased slightly from 3.5% in 2005 to 3.7% in 2009. Despite this slight increase in unemployment, Malaysia
remains in full employment position. The unemployment rate improved marginally to 3.6% in 2010. The quality
of life for Malaysians improved through better access to healthcare, public transport, electricity and water.
Measures were also taken to create a caring society and promote community well-being. Economic development
was based on sustainability principles to ensure that the environment and natural resources are preserved so that
growth will not come at a cost to future generations.
Even though poverty is effectively managed, the current income of the country is considerably low and 40% of
households still struggle with a monthly income which is less than RM2, 300 (US$766.66). The perceived
disparity in income levels and economic status between Sabah and Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia should be
addressed effectively. Additionally, an effective strategy should be adopted to minimize the disparity of
economic status between rural and urban areas. In order to cater the issues emerging between different
geographical areas and Communities, the New Economic Model and the Tenth Malaysia Plan were devised to
focus on inclusive growth and aspire to provide equal opportunities to all Malaysians.
Malaysia’s success in reducing poverty was due to the policy of poverty eradication being made an integral part
of the National Economic Plan (NEP). Poverty eradication programs were implemented alongside development
plans and financial allocations for them were made in all the Malaysia Plans.When evaluating the impact that
anti-poverty policies may, this study concludes that much caution is in order. Despite the ostensible official
concern about poverty over the last thirty years, and the remarkable lifespan of new economic policy-inspired
policymaking, a number of problematic issues remain. For instance, there is still relatively little detailed
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
54
information about the characteristics of the poor that could help ascertain the reasons for their poverty and thus
identify what the appropriate and effective measures and to overcome poverty might be.
Detailed, analytically grounded, poverty profiles are particularly necessary in view of the increasingly
recognized phenomenon of ‘hard-core' poverty which is often remarked as being relatively unaffected by
existing poverty eradication measures. Furthermore, a great deal of expenditure on what is officially categorized
as poverty eradication, actually refers to expenditure on rural and agricultural development, much of which does
not directly help to raise the poor out of poverty. Given the concerns raised, it is crucial that detailed information
on the use of anti-poverty funds be provided in order to ascertain to what extent such expenditure actually
benefited the poor. Such information is also crucial in order to minimize the budgetary abuses that seem to have
been made in the name of poverty eradication.
6. Recommendation
The study has suggested some recommendations that will enhance economic development and poverty reduction
in Malaysia. The young people from the rural areas should be given the technical and vocational training as they
form the back bone of work force. Promoting the development of concentrated industrial clusters and supporting
ecosystem towards enabling specialisation and economies of scale; increasingly targeting investment promotion
towards investment quality (as opposed to just quantity), which support higher value add activities and diffusion
of technology; and increasing public investment into the enablers of innovation, and venture capital funding.
Skills training should be given special emphasis to develop the necessary human capital to meet industry’s
requirements and drive productivity improvements to move up the value chain.
Technical education and vocational training should be mainstreamed, with a focus towards raising the quality of
qualifications. This is a key towards providing a viable alternative to enable individuals to realise their full
potential, according to their own inclination and talent. This principle necessitates a renewed focus on
championing the interests of each and every community, ensuring no group is left behind or marginalised in the
course of the nation’s development. Social justice should be required taking into consideration the respective
levels of achievement of each community. The distributional policies of the government will therefore be
focused towards ensuring equality of opportunities for all.
The well-being of the urban bottom 40% households will have to be addressed through capacity building
programs to improve their income and overall quality of life. Programs to increase the incomes of rural
households will focus on upgrading their skills, linking them to employers in nearby clusters and cities as well as
providing support for self employment, micro-businesses and small scale industries. Efforts will also have to be
focussed to increase the productivity and sustainability of agro-based activities through the adoption of modern
agricultural technology and expansion of contract farming. Improved human capital productivity within rural
agriculture and agro-based industries has to be reinvigorated. Additionally, skills training are needed in areas
such as carpentry, tailoring, baking, hospitality, handicrafts, motor mechanism and food processing to support
self-employment. The delivery of these training programmes will be tailored to the specific opportunities of
target localities.
The country needs to improve its balance of workforce and tertiary education. Malaysia’s current workforce with
tertiary education stands at 23%, whereas the average for Organisation of Economic Co-operation and
Development (OECD) countries is nearly 28%. Furthermore, of the graduating students who were employed, 29%
in 2006 and 33% in 2009 earned less than RM1, 500 (US$500) per month. Employers and industry associations
state that lack of soft skills - such as positive work ethics, communications, teamwork, decision making and
leadership skills.
For students graduating from local higher education institutions in 2009, 27% remained unemployed six months
after completion of their hampering employability of many Malaysian graduates. As there is still a sizeable gap
between the competency levels of graduates and comparable international standards, the issue of graduate
competency needs to be addressed to ensure that Malaysia has a skilled, well-rounded and employable graduate
pool to enter the workforce.
Even though Malaysia is highly successful in reducing poverty and expects to materialize seven crucial
recommendations in relation to the MGDs by 2015, the country is experiencing disparities in many ways among
the local communities. These disparities should be attended by local friendly and area specific intervention
strategies bridge the persisting gaps between communities living in different geographical areas with much
dissimilarity. Therefore, an increased attention should be directed on the most vulnerable population groups in
order to bring an apparel improvement in their lives.
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
55
Malaysia is a multi-racial or non-homogenous nation with wide and entrenched disparities of economic
opportunities and incomes, the government has or may have to intervene in the market place and maintain
affirmative action type programs to ensure a fairer distribution of opportunities and incomes among all racial and
social groups. The avoidance or reluctance to undertake such initiatives and to succeed in achieving them, may
lead to social unrest and violence. The affirmative action program only on the Bumiputeras is no longer
sustainable.
An effective environmental policy came into existence to make certain the Malaysian environmental
sustainability. On the other hand, promises should be delivered to the global community and to itself–as
specified by environmental strategies, by legislation and policies on various aspects such as environmental and
resource management, green energy, physical planning and climate change. Malaysia should also develop
suitable incentives for states and the private sector to implement initiatives and to comply with national policies
and objectives. A suitable and comprehensive strategy should be created to motivate state governments and
private entities to execute the policies and achieve the goals.
Rising temperature is associated with volatile weather changes, shifts in rainfall patterns and climate zones and a
rise in sea levels. Due to its climate and location, Malaysia is among the many economies that are likely to feel
the force of climate events sooner, rather than later–in the form of coastal and inland flooding, rise in vector
borne diseases, or drops in agricultural yields due to continuous occurrence of droughts. These events not only
have the potential to destroy lives and communities, but also pose a significant economic risk. The government
has to review the value at risk for communities to develop a clear understanding of the cost-benefit trade-offs
involved in averting or reducing the impact of such climate-related hazards.
7. Conclusion
Protective measures should be in place to combat any potential repercussions inflicted upon poor communities
those are fragile to globalization and liberalization. All ethnic groups, regardless of their diversity, should be
provided with an opportunity to access to broad proficiencies required for the economy. Actions should be
triggered at policy levels to address the potential roots of poverty and perceived inattention on the issues of
sidelined communities as to assure the inclusion of marginalized. Self sustained programs that promote the poor‘s
involvement in activities to increase their level of income and plans for empowerment of poor also should be in
place. Actions should be taken to deal with negative attitudes regarding to poor’s status. A priority should be given
to empower the community and encourage mutual support and attentiveness among its members. The complex
dynamics of poverty to be triumphed with a multi-disciplinary approach and poverty alleviation tasks should be
focused on the enhancement of human skills, innovativeness and knowledge of the poor.
References
Abidin, M. Z., & Rasiah, R. (2009). The global financial crisis and the Malaysian economy: Impact and
responses. UNDP. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org.my
Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2010). Monthly statistical bulletin. Retrieved from
http://www.statistics.gov.my
Departments of Statistics Malaysia. (2011). Monthly statistical bulletin. Retrieved from
http://www.statistics.gov.my
Economic Planning Unit. (2009). Database, economic planning unit, Ministry of Finances Malaysia. Retrieved
from http://www.treasury.gov.my
Mahani, Z. A. (2009). New model needed to spur economy. The Star, 3 April, 2009. Retrieved from
http://www.star .com. my
Mat Zin, R. (2011). Measuring and monitoring poverty and inequality: The Malaysian experience. Institute of
Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore.
Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2011). Principal statistics of labor forces, Malaysia, 2011. Retrieved from
http://www.treasury.gov.my
Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2011a). Poverty reduction programs in Malaysia achievement and challenges.
Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.my
Mohd, S. (2012). Welfare regime, social protection and poverty reduction. In B. T. Khoo (Ed.), Policy regimes
and the political economy of poverty reduction in Malaysia (pp. 107-145). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
www.ccsenet.org/ach Asian Culture and History Vol. 5, No. 2; 2013
56
Nair, S. (2010). Moving forward: Its poverty agenda challenges, dilemmas and options for Malaysia. Centre for
Poverty and Development Studies (CPDS), University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.
The Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia. (2010). Tenth Malaysia plan 2011-2015. The Economic Planning Unit,
Prime Minister`s Department, Putrajaya: Malaysia.
United Nations. (2011). Malaysia: The millennium development goals at 2010. United Nations Country Team,
Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.
... However, it is almost a difficult task to measure calorie deficiency (energy) (Kakwani, 2003). The consumption of food in the rural poor and urban areas varies significantly from the static food bundle (Ahmed, 2004;Hatta and Ali, 2013). The DCI methods measure undernourishment, not poverty (Ahmed, 2004). ...
... Many poor households may be identified as non-poor, and many rich households may be identified as poor (Kakwani, 2003). In the case of Bangladesh, the DCI method overestimates poverty in urban areas and underestimates poverty in rural areas (Kakwani, 2003;Hatta & Ali, 2013). Hence, it is not appropriate to measure poverty in Bangladesh. ...
Chapter
Poverty has been measured and calculated in Bangladesh based on the Food Energy Intake (FEI), Cost of Basic Needs (CBN) and Direct Calorie Intake (2122 calories a day) (DCI) since the mid-1990s (GOB, 2010). Currently, it is one of the principal weakness of the measurement of poverty in Bangladesh. Poverty cannot be calculated from a single dimension as it is multidimensional in nature. The absence of the Multidimensional Poverty (MDP) measurement of Bangladesh means that attempts have thus far failed to capture poverty from a holistic view. In Bangladesh, DCN, CBN and FEI indicators generally neglect the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) of poverty. Those under the poverty level experience deprivation in terms of health, education and livelihood. The MPI shows important progress in internationally comparable measurements of poverty. This portrait of poverty is more effective by shifting from income factors with other dimensions that are inherently important such as education facilities, proper health care and living standard. The study recommends the MPI technique of assessing poverty in Bangladesh that is considered a more effective method.
... Following the implementation of family planning policies in the 1970s, China's birth rate has steadily declined. Notably, Sichuan's annual birth rate and natural growth rate have consistently lagged behind the national average by approximately 0.2% [14]. Consequently, the reduced number of births has contributed to a relative increase in the proportion and size of the elderly population. ...
Article
Full-text available
This study investigates the current state of population aging in Sichuan Province, China, and proposes effective countermeasures to address this pressing issue. Through an in-depth analysis of data from the 2020 seventh population census, the research examines key aspects of population aging, including demographic profiles, self-reported health status of the elderly, primary livelihood sources, and old-age dependency ratios. The findings revealed that Sichuan Province has exceeded the national average in population aging, marking its entry into a deep aging stage. Notably, over half of the elderly population reported confidence in their overall health, and retirement pensions had become their primary income source. A comparative analysis with 2010 census data highlights evolving trends and challenges in Sichuan's population aging. The study recommends practical countermeasures, including exploring smart aging solutions, to address these challenges.
... Impoverished families and children living in the world's low-and middle-income countries are highly vulnerable, powerless and afraid [5,6,7]. The live at the very margin of human existence, their dignity is assaulted daily, and their lives are abundant in scarcity [8,9,10]. Because of lack of hope and uncertainties about the future, impoverished individuals do resort to crime and a number of unhealthy practices. ...
Article
Poverty and alcoholism are among the top challenges confronting societies worldwide and essential research subjects in the last few decades. This paper developed a deterministic model governed by a system of nonlinear differential equations to proffer a solution to the burden of poverty and alcoholism in a population. The model was studied under two different systems, namely: autonomous and non-autonomous systems. Under the autonomous system, the following analysis was carried out; Poverty and alcoholism reproduction number using the next-generation method; this was done to know all the parameters contributing to the dynamics of poverty and alcoholism in a population. Also, local and global sensitivity analysis was done using the normalized forward method and Latin hypercube sampling and partial rank correlation coefficients, respectively; this was done to identify the parameters of the model that most influence thy dynamical behaviour of the model. The non-autonomous model with three time-dependent controls was analyzed using Pontryagin's Maximum Principle to find the optimal solution to the poverty and alcoholism control problem. Cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to further affirm the results of the optimal control problem by using the average cost-effectiveness ratio and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio methods. Numerical simulations were presented to buttress all the theoretical results. .
... Poverty is not only defined as lack of food, clothing, and shelter. Poverty is now widely understood and covers the fields of economics, health, and education, even lack of access to information received is also interpreted as poverty [4,5,6,7,8,9]. Poverty makes people unable to obtain quality education [10,11,12,13] difficulties in health financing [14,15] unemployment [16,17], the absence of savings and investments [18,19,20], lack of social security and family protection, and strengthening urbanization ICOSSH VI to cities [21,22,23]. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this research is to examine and provide guidelines for local governments, communities, academics, and the private sector in planning and implementing poverty alleviation activities that are more effective, efficient, and on target. In addition, the specific objectives of this study are: 1) increasing the rate of regional economic growth through optimizing potential sources of regional income; 2) increasing per capita income; and 3) reducing poverty, unemployment, and socioeconomic inequality in the community. The research was conducted in Palembang City, South Sumatra, Indonesia, in the last 10 years, namely, 2017-2022. The research approach uses qualitative descriptive analysis. Moreover, data sources include secondary data and regional statistics. The results of this study are based on the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) indicators. Based on the four priority scales in poverty alleviation, namely, Health and Infrastructure (Priority I), Education (Priority II), Food Stability (Priority III), and Population and Employment (Priority IV), a budget approach, through optimizing the regional economy and regional sources of income as well as community empowerment factors, is an important solution to poverty alleviation strategies. In addition, involvement between elements (government, organizations, communities, universities, and institutions) is expected to continue as an effort to realize that poverty alleviation can be overcome optimally. Keywords: sustainable development goals, social welfare, macroeconomics, policy
... Poverty is not only defined as lack of food, clothing, and shelter. Poverty is now widely understood and covers the fields of economics, health, and education, even lack of access to information received is also interpreted as poverty (Andrew Holden, 2011;Buheji et al., 2020;Hatta & Ali, 2013;Jenkins & Johnson, 1992;Kakwani & Silber, 2008;Spicker et al., 2007). Poverty makes people unable to obtain quality education (Hernandez, 2011;Sandel, n.d.;Tania et al., 2011;The World Bank, 2017), difficulties in health financing (Anyon, 2017;Haberman, 2010)unemployment (Blustein &;Guarino, 2020; Bridge the What Is, N.D.; Hupe & Buffat, 2014), the absence of savings and investments (Barrett, Christopher & Carter, Michael, 2012;Laborde et al., 2021;Shandmi et al., 2020), lack of social security and family protection, and strengthening urbanization to cities (Awumbila et al., 2014;Cobbinah & Amoako, 2012;Tacoli.C, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this research is to examine and provide guidelines for local governments, communities, academics, and the private sector in planning and implementing poverty alleviation activities that are more effective, efficient, and on target. In addition, the specific objectives of this study are: 1) increasing the rate of regional economic growth through optimizing potential sources of regional income, 2) increasing per capita income, and 3) reducing poverty, unemployment, and socioeconomic inequality of the community. The research was conducted in Palembang City, South Sumatra, Indonesia, in the last 10 years, namely 2017-2022. The research approach uses qualitative descriptive analysis. Data sources include secondary data and Regional Statistics. The results of this study are based on the Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) indicators, there are four priority scales in poverty alleviation, namely, Health and Infrastructure (Priority I), Education (Priority II), Food Stability (Priority III), and Population and Employment (Priority IV). Therefore, as a solution to poverty alleviation strategies, a budget approach through optimizing the regional economy and regional sources of income as well as community empowerment factors is important. In addition, involvement between elements (government, organizations, communities, universities, and institutions) is expected to continue as an effort to realize poverty alleviation can be overcome optimally.
... This is because government policies are instrumental in mobilizing resources and funds to invest in SDG and the private sector. The outcome supports studies by Zhan and Santos-Paulino (2021) and Che (2018) but refutes studies by Oyeranti and Olayiwola (2005) and Hatta et al. (2013), who found many challenges associated with government policies serving as a driving force between asset mobilization and citizens' participation. ...
Article
Full-text available
Plain Language Summary Purpose: This study investigates the effects of the asset-based community development (ABCD) approach, thus, local resources, asset mobilization, and citizens’ participation on rural poverty alleviation in the northern part of Ghana by employing the moderating role of government policies. Methods: The study adopted the convenient sampling technique to obtain data from 550 respondents. The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) v. 23 and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) via SmartPLS v. 3 were used to evaluate the proposed relationships based on the data obtained. Conclusion: We found that local resources, asset mobilization and citizens’ participation all had significant positive effects on rural poverty alleviation. Also the moderation role of government policies between asset mobilization and rural poverty alleviation. However, the moderation role of government policies between local resources and citizens’ participation were statistically insignificant. Implications: Local government agencies located in these regions as well as non-governmental organizations, donor organizations, individual philanthropists etc, interested in promoting the ABCD concept in Ghana and other developing countries should enact policies that can promote the identification of local resources, efficient asset mobilization and effective participations of citizens in decision making processes toward rural poverty alleviation.
Chapter
Social safety nets (SSNs) are vital to combat poverty, marginalization, and vulnerability in Bangladesh. However, swift urbanization, climate changes, and natural disasters, along with the current SSN portfolio, offer important prospects for alliance and justification around key vulnerabilities. The portfolio has increased over the years, and currently, 145 schemes are being implemented through 23 ministries across Bangladesh. Its total spending amounts to 13 percent of the annual public budget or 2.02 percent of GDP. The government of Bangladesh spent US$3.5 billion on social protection in 2017. The SSN is vital to combat poverty vulnerabilities and to improve the living standards of Bangladesh citizens. However, outstanding issues include inadequate coverage and benefits, poor management and supervision, inadequate monitoring, and the effectiveness of these programmes for poverty alleviation as well as economic growth. Further, corruption, overlap, lack of coordination, and weak accountability are challenges for SSNs in Bangladesh. This paper will examine the challenges of SSNs for poverty reduction and provide suggestions for more effective poverty reduction policies in Bangladesh.
Article
Full-text available
Since independence, the Malaysian government has invested billions of ringgits in the fight against poverty. Despite the national decrease in the percentage of the population living in poverty, the state of Sabah has had the highest poverty rate in Malaysia since 1997. Why has the poverty alleviation programme been less effective in reducing this social phenomenon among the poor communities in Sabah? To address this question, this paper discusses the issues and challenges confronting stakeholders involved in the poverty eradication programme in Sabah. The paper focuses on the implementation of the People's Income Initiative (PII) Phase 1 project in two communities: Penimbawan Village, Tuaran, and Bongkol Village, Pitas. This qualitative study reveals those participants, implementing agencies, and other stakeholders face issues and challenges when implementing poverty eradication projects. Furthermore, the issues faced by the poverty eradication project participants were found to include their own attitudes towards the project, such as a lack of focus on or interest in the project; the existence of a subsidy mentality; and the lack of clarity regarding the project's goals. However, the implementing agency was discovered to encounter issues with market support. The difficulties currently faced by these three parties could affect how long the PII Project can successfully eradicate poverty in both localities.
Technical Report
Full-text available
As with most of the East and Southeast Asian economies, the impact of the global economic and financial crisis on Malaysia has been felt largely through a contraction in aggregate demand caused by a collapse in exports, either directly or indirectly, to the United States. GDP growth slowed down to 0.1% in the last quarter of 2008, and decelerated by -6.2% and -3.9% respectively in the first two quarters of 2009 as a consequence. This contraction has aggravated the already cooling Malaysian economy. Not only did manufacturing slow down substantially, but the overall GDP growth rate of Malaysia had fallen significantly below its targeted vision 2020 rate for 2000-2007, which was to achieve a per capita income of US$15,450 by 2020. The deceleration is expected to create a shortfall of 26% in 2010 in comparison with the vision 2020 GDP growth trajectory. This is despite the fact that price volatilities and commodity price swings have largely spared Malaysia from serious problems in the commodity sector, even though the subsidy amount borne by the Government to independent power plants and the domestic market increased each time world prices of petroleum and gas rose. Malaysia also did not absorb any direct destabilisation through either the currency or capital market, as it had little exposure to the financial derivatives that emerged from the sub-prime stocks. The Central Bank in the country, Bank Negara Malaysia, also managed the financial sector well following the bitter experience of the Asian financial crisis, and hence non-performing loans as a share of total loans fell to 2.2% in 2008 and remained at roughly that level in the first two quarters of 2009. The Government introduced two rescue packages with attractive fiscal stimuli totalling RM67 billion (US$18.1 billion). The purpose of these packages was to absorb retrenchment and the destabilisation shocks faced by the people and to accelerate development expenditure to offset a fall in aggregate demand because of significantly reduced exports. The 2009-2010 budget went further in its attempt to transform Malaysia into a high-income country. While this is an excellent objective, what is unclear are the strategies required to achieve it. This report details the following steps that must be taken to achieve the 2020 vision: 1. Maintain strong macroeconomic fundamentals and the excellent financial policies undertaken by the Government and its key agencies. 2. Bring much greater balance between external and domestic sources of demand by significantly increasing the latter. 3. Ensure better targeting of stimulus and development packages. 4. Maintain stimulus and development packages to address and overcome the vision 2020 GDP growth path deficit. 5. Ensure a central focus on human resource development policies, prioritising the creation of a much larger pool of indigenous scientists and technologically skilled people. 6. Deepen the policy shift towards a knowledge-based economy. 7. Significantly increase research and development as a percentage of GDP. 8. Re-orientate FDI policy toward technological upgrading
Article
Full-text available
Malaysia is currently at the crossroads with respect to its poverty agenda. The way forward would require a paradigm shift in not only the manner in which poverty is conceptualised and defined but also in the way in which strategies and programmes are conceived and executed. Despite achieving commendable progress in reducing the incidence of poverty from 49.3% in 1970 to 3.6-% in 2007 there are still critical issues to grapple with and urgent problems to resolve. While rural poverty still continues to be the focus of policymakers, urban poverty also needs policy attention and prescriptions. Stubborn pockets of poverty continue to elude policy solutions and new forms of poverty are emerging in the context of a country that sees itself as a developed nation by 2020. What does Malaysia need to do in order to deal effectively with its poverty problems from a policy and programme perspective? What are the changes needed in order to ensure that poor and vulnerable groups in the society are not marginalised while Malaysia becomes a developed nation? This paper will provide insights into the strategic directions that policies and programmes need to take to resolve Malaysia poverty problems it will begin with an overview of poverty in Malaysia which will provide the contextual framework for the subsequent discussions. The second part of the paper will highlight the various changes that have taken place over time in the way in which poverty issues are dealt with. The third part of the paper will examine innovative ways in which poverty has been conceptualised and defined and its theoretical premises while the fourth part of the paper will review creative ways in which poverty has been dealt with both in the country and elsewhere and will conclude with some recommendations for policy and programmes direction.
Chapter
This chapter examines various policies and schemes of social protection, security and assistance, and innovative agricultural programmes, with an emphasis on their impacts upon poverty. The social security schemes include the pension scheme, Employees Provident Fund (EPF), Armed Forces Fund (AFF) and the Employer’s Liability Scheme. The main social insurance scheme to be discussed is the scheme provided by the Social Security Organization (SOCSO). The social assistance programmes are mostly those provided by the Department of Social Welfare (in the Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development). Detailed discussions of the programmes of social assistance are linked to the design of Malaysia’s welfare regime as well as its evolution to eradicate poverty. The discussions on the social security schemes focus on the adequacy of retirement benefits. This chapter also contains a section on reforms and structural changes to the social protection programmes to tackle the issues of poverty associated with inadequate income.
The global financial crisis and the Malaysian economy: Impact and responses. UNDP. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org.my Department of Statistics Malaysia Monthly statistical bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my Departments of Statistics Malaysia Monthly statistical bulletin
  • M Z Abidin
  • R Rasiah
Abidin, M. Z., & Rasiah, R. (2009). The global financial crisis and the Malaysian economy: Impact and responses. UNDP. Retrieved from http://www.undp.org.my Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2010). Monthly statistical bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my Departments of Statistics Malaysia. (2011). Monthly statistical bulletin. Retrieved from http://www.statistics.gov.my
Database, economic planning unit, Ministry of Finances Malaysia. Retrieved from http
Economic Planning Unit. (2009). Database, economic planning unit, Ministry of Finances Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.my
New model needed to spur economy. The Star
  • Z A Mahani
Mahani, Z. A. (2009). New model needed to spur economy. The Star, 3 April, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.star.com. my
Measuring and monitoring poverty and inequality: The Malaysian experience
  • R Mat Zin
Mat Zin, R. (2011). Measuring and monitoring poverty and inequality: The Malaysian experience. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies: Singapore.
Poverty reduction programs in Malaysia achievement and challenges. Retrieved from http
  • Finance Ministry
  • Malaysia
Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2011a). Poverty reduction programs in Malaysia achievement and challenges. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.my
Tenth Malaysia plan 2011-2015. The Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister`s Department
  • Malaysia
The Economic Planning Unit, Malaysia. (2010). Tenth Malaysia plan 2011-2015. The Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister`s Department, Putrajaya: Malaysia.
Malaysia: The millennium development goals at 2010. United Nations Country Team
United Nations. (2011). Malaysia: The millennium development goals at 2010. United Nations Country Team, Kuala Lumpur: Malaysia.