ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The present study descriptive - correlational pretended to describe the relationship between dispositional optimism, psychosocial factors such as coping, spirituality and stressful life events in parents or family care-givers and teachers and sociodemographic factors such as age, education level, family composition, gender and socioeconomic status. The sample was formed by 319 high school students (male and female), between 12 and 18 years old; 138 parents and 19 teachers. It was used the Cuestionario de Optimismo Disposicional (Londono et al., 2013); the Coping Style Inventory (Archila & Londono, 2004), Stressful Life Events Scale (WHO); the Index of Spirituality and Wellness (Daaleman & Frey, 2004). The comparative and associative multivariate analysis showed that mixed coping in young people (social support, fantasy and self-blame) in addition to mixed coping in parents (problem solving and social support) predicted dispositional optimism in young people.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Copyright 2014 by Sociedad Chilena de Psicología Clínica
ISSN 0716-6184 (impresa) · ISSN 0718-4808 (en línea)
2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : Psychosocial factors as predictors of
dispositional optimism in young people
¿Qué nos hace optimistas?: Factores psicosociales predictores al optimismo disposicional
en jóvenes
Constanza Londoño Pérez
Marcela Velasco Salamanca
Ivonne Alejo Castañeda
Paula Botero Soto
Ivonne Joliet Vanegas
Universidad Católica de Colombia, Colombia
Rec ( ) Acept ( )
The present study descriptive – correlational pretended to describe the relationship between dispositional
optimism, psychosocial factors such as coping, spirituality and stressful life events in parents or family care-
givers and teachers and sociodemographic factors such as age, education level, family composition, gender
and socioeconomic status. The sample was formed by 319 high school students (male and female), between
12 and 18 years old; 138 parents and 19 teachers. It was used the Cuestionario de OptimismoDisposicional
(Londoño et al., 2013); the Coping Style Inventory (Archila&Londoño, 2004), Stressful Life Events Scale
(WHO); the Index of Spirituality and Wellness (Daaleman& Frey, 2004). The comparative and associative
multivariate analysis showed that mixed coping in young people (social support, fantasy and self-blame) in
addition to mixed coping in parents (problem solving and social support) predicted dispositional optimism
in young people.
Keywords: Optimism, coping, young people.
El presente estudio descriptivo correlacinal pretendía describir la relación entre optimismo disposicional y
factores psicosociales como afrontamiento, espiritualidad, acontecimientos vitales estresantes y optimismo
disposicional en padres o familiares acudientes y maestros; y con factores sociodemográcos (edad, nivel
educativo, conformación familiar, género y estrato). La muestra fue de 319 jóvenes, entre 12 y 18 años de
ambos géneros, 138 padres y 19 maestros. Se usaronel Cuestionario de Optimismo Disposicional (Londoño
et al., 2013), el Inventario de Estilos de Afrontamiento (Archila& Londoño, 2004), la Escala de Eventos
Vitales Estresantes de la OMS, el Índice de Espiritualidad y Bienestar (Daaleman& Frey, 2004). Los análisis
multivariantes comparativos y de asociación, evidenciaron que el afrontamiento mixto en jóvenes (búsqueda
de soporte social, fantasía y auto culpa); sumado al afrontamiento mixto en los padres (solución de problemas
y búsqueda de soporte social) predecían el optimismo disposicional en los jóvenes.
Palabras clave: optimismo, afrontamiento, jóvenes.
Correspondencia: Constanza Londoño Pérez, Avenida Caracas No. 46-40 Piso 1, dirección.
constanza londoño.indd 33 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
Constanza Londoño Pérez, MarCeLa VeLasCo saLaManCa, IVonne aLejo Castañeda,
PauLa Botero soto, IVonne joLIet Vanegas
The optimism has been dened as the person tendency
to be motivated by beliefs about the desired results are
easily achievable. These statements have a positive effect
in psychological and physical health (Brannon &Feist,
2001; Gómez &Londoño, 2013; Londoño; 2009). Optimism
includes a positive vision about what people have and help
the individual satisfaction in terms of reaching the goals in a
short future with some program effort, if they have not been
reached yet (Marrero &Caballeira, 2010). Optimism has a
meaningful impact on perceived quality of life in ill people
and help to recover from illness events (Morales et al., 2011;
Ridder, Schreurs&Bensing, 2004; Scheier& Carver, 1985;
2014), because optimism enhances the individual capacity
to copy with general tension (Fournier, Ridder, &Besing,
2002; Gordon, Feldman, Crase,& Schoen, 2002; Kennedy &
Hughes, 2004; Ortiz, Ramos & Vera, 2003;Perera&Mcllven,
2014; Scheier, & Carver, 2014).
Therefore, optimism is a psychological resource to
enable individual coping the adverse situations (Remor,
Amorós&Carboles, 2006). For some authors, optimism
is a learned dimension of the personality, as a result of
the interaction between inheritance – environment; other
authors afrm optimism is a part of the genetic base of the
personality, expressed as a dispositional feature in the middle
of external situations and the individual interpretation of
them (Kim &Seidlitz, 2002; Seligman, 2005). This dilemma
justies the studies to recognize if the optimism is part of an
inherited structural base of the personality or a cognitive and
behavioral style learned through the interaction of several
psychosocial factors, as the social interaction.
Otherwise, there is a negative extremity called pessi-
mism in opposition to the optimistic view (Salas, 2008;
Seligman, 2005). The pessimistic style implies the vision
of external, nonpermanent and situational causes to explain
the negative events; also, a vision of internal, permanent
and generalized causes to different areas of the individuals
life (Remor et al., 2006).
Instead, dispositional optimism has generalized ex-
pectancies about success that lead the person action to get
great results, even the person shows willing to persist in the
adverse situation. The positive effects of the dispositional
optimism in health are considered in the self – regulation
theory, in terms of the individual with positive expectancies
about the future have more probability to make an effort to
reach their goals (Ridder et al., 2004 cited by Vera-Villarroel,
Córdova-Rubio &Celis-Atenas, 2009).
The positive effect of the dispositional optimism in health
has been widely studied (Ridder et al., 2004) and it has
showed the benecial impact in the physical wellbeing and
good health, as well as the effective recovery and adaption
to illness in chronic patients (Chico, 2002). In general, it
is well known that if people hold favorable expectancies
about their situation and increase their efforts to obtain great
results (Martínez-Correa, Reyesdel Paso, García-León &
González-Jareño, 2006;Remor, et al., 2006), they certainly
gain the best health outcomes.
The optimistic person is realistic in the situations and uses
his potential to solve the problem in an effective way. This
has been conrmed through the Parkinson, cardiometabolic
risk, arterial pressure, general physical functioning, disease
progression (Gison, Dall´armi, Donati, Rizza,&Guiaquinto,
2014; Oreskovic& Goodman, 2013; Senkus, Cardoso,
&Pagani, 2014). The people using optimism as a coping
resource with positive attitude to stressful circumstances
can have better levels of life. In this sense, Kennedy and
Hughes, (2004), Covey and Davis (2004) and Black and
Reynolds (2011) found that cognitive functioning in terms
of positive and optimistic style prevents depression and
anxiety, improves the physical and emotional functioning,
generates better adapting processes and tends to perceive
problems as preventable, adopting healthier styles of life.
Optimism comes up when the individual needs to
response to difcult situation with potential damage or
stressful events (Britton, Sliter, &Jex, 2012; Solis & Vidal,
2006; Taylor, 2007). There are some universal situations
related to stress reactions in most of the people; life events
viewed by people as stressful in terms of the interpretation
of the events as higher than the response capacity to coping
them. Depending on the age of the individual, the events
have the power of affect the psychological wellbeing and
can have dysfunctional effects in emotional, behavioral
and cognitive levels.
According to the optimistic curve along life, the parents
as adults tend to be more optimistic than younger people,
in terms of behaviors or actions to get positive results they
are waiting for. However, young people try to make actions
to relieve discomfort; usually they deny discomfort, take
emotional distance of the situation and avoid it in cognitive
and behavioral ways (Lench& Ditto, 2008). On the other
hand and regarding gender and sociodemographic aspects,
there are not differences in terms of optimism, except people
with more economic resources tend to be more pessimistic
about the future (Fischer & Chalmers, 2008; Londoño, 2009).
Stressful events are coping in different ways for people
and Lazarus and Folkman (1986) proposed coping styles
constanza londoño.indd 34 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people
or ways of answer to internal or external demands; these
demands are view as excessive or challenging the personal
resources (Brannon &Feist, 2001;Taylor & Stanton 2007).
Coping process starts with individual assessment of an event
as stressful, with unpleasant and intense emotions. Coping
answers begin in an emotional context and often the rst task
in coping is related to regulate negative emotions that can
block instrumental actions of coping (Folkman&Moskowitz,
2004; Jaser et al., 2007; Patzelt& Shepherd, 2011).
In general, there are two general styles or coping types,
one of them is positive and oriented to solve the problem;
the individual leads efforts to carry out a plan designed to
resolve the stressful situation. The other one is negative or
focused on avoiding the stressful event, minimizing the
unpleasant emotion. Problem – focused coping implies a
view centered in the real change of the situation; the nega-
tive coping is oriented to change the emotion (Gordon et
al., 2002); in some cases the problem is left behind or the
solution is delayed temporary while the impact of event
is happening, in other cases, it is done in a stable way. No
entiendo en español a que se reere esta frase en azul.
However, there is no maladaptive coping style universally
(Compas, Connor-Smith, Saltzman, Thomsen, & Wadsworth,
2001), because a problem – focused coping can be useless
in a permanent event with no possibility of control and it is
better for the individual relieve the emotion to improve the
quality of life and manage the initial emotional response.
Some researchers have identied individual and stable
differences in coping, improving the ability to deal with
stressful events and leading to feel less discomfort and better
health outcomes. No entiendo la última frase en español en
relación con algunos investigadores.
These differences are due to the cognitive, behavioral
and emotional responses to the situations and no related
to variables such as age (Castro, 2002). What makes the
variation in the response to stress is related to personal com-
petences, social support and context (Glozah&Pevalin, 2014;
Sandín, 2002). Nevertheless, some authors have noticed the
tendency to avoiding coping in teenagers that is exacerbated
at the beginning of the youth and it is becoming stable in
the adulthood, depending on the behavioral options offered
by models and context. In the specic case of adults, the
coping style is stable but it is not invariable, because it is
not a xed element of personality, it is a process more than
a trait and the change is dene by the learning capacities of
the individual more than age, gender or economic condition.
Coping is also mediated by a group of positive beliefs
used to process the information in a way in which the adver-
sity is viewed as unstable, solvable and manageable, in this
scenario it is more probable the adjustment to the situation.
On the other hand, attributions related touncontrollability
and stability of the illness has been associated to avoiding
coping (Taylor & Stanton, 2007).
Nonetheless, some psychological resources as spirituality
seem to maximize the capacity to coping negative events
and the optimistic assessment that everything is going to be
alright. Spirituality is related to essence, individuality and
the feeling of being itself as a person. This construct has
been considered as hard to measure because the difculties
in delimitation due to the confusion between spirituality and
religiosity. It is clear that spirituality is focused on beliefs
and perceptions about the goodness (Weaver y Flannelly,
2004), kindness and transcendence expressed in the spiritual
meaning, the daily spiritual experiences and the purpose
of life. The religiosity is regarding faith, religious beliefs
and practice, aspects that converge and overlap each other
in practice transcendental and religious daily life (Sooet
et al., 2009). Faith gives the suffering person a sense and
meaning of the hard situations such as diseases and adver-
sity, giving a control feeling; spirituality has been linked to
bigger adjustment and effective coping in chronic diseases,
as cancer (Shinall, Ehrenfeld, &Guillamondegui, 2014) and
AIDS (Lyon et al., 2011; Cho & Park, 2013).
Specically, religious beliefs and practices, beliefs in
goodness and kindness (Kazemi, 2010), the self – reported
spirituality (Lucchetti, Lucchetti, & Koenig, 2011) and in-
uenced on end-of-life decision making(Webb & Stouffer,
2014) all of them has been associated to the positive response
to treatments to improve mental health, decrease drugs abuse
(Ragsdale, Hegner, Mueller,& Davies, 2014), health beha-
vior change (Fried et al., 2012) and increase quality of life
(Hasanovic&Pajevic, 2012; Moreira-Almeida &Koening,
2006; Robinson, Cranford, Webb & Brower, 2007).
In some cases, higher spirituality has been linked to ten-
dency to have less healthier behaviors (Boswell, Kahana&
Dilworth-Anderson, 2006; Lillis, Gifford, Humphreys,&
Moos, 2008; McCullough &Laurenceau, 2005) because
the person thinks is protected; this idea is related to the
optimistic belief no realistic, in which a bias of external
control is waiting for protection of God despite of the risky
behaviors to health. The relationship between optimism and
spirituality has not been studied enough.
In opposition, it has been found that people coping with
spiritual strategies seem to have advantages in comparison
to people who do not use them. Litwinczuk and Groh (2008)
found that people more spiritual achieved easily: a) evoke
emotions and feelings of comfort, b) perceive more stronghold,
empowerment and control, c) diminish the emotional charge
constanza londoño.indd 35 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
Constanza Londoño Pérez, MarCeLa VeLasCo saLaManCa, IVonne aLejo Castañeda,
PauLa Botero soto, IVonne joLIet Vanegas
caused by the disease, d) feel they receive social support, e)
feel spiritual support through the close relation perceived
with goodness, f) give sense to the disease and accept it, g)
perceive help in the process of maintain health, h) relieve
fear and uncertainty related to death, i) self – acceptance
and j) reduce self – blame. These authors also afrmed that
increasing spiritual activity is linked to diminishing of stress
and disappearing unpleasant feelings.
Therefore, to study coping and spirituality as personal
conditions related to optimistic beliefs about benecial events
can provide more information to understand the source of
optimistic trend. In addition, understanding the effect of some
factors linked to the appearance and maintain of cognitive
and behavioral styles centered in dispositional optimism
is important if the goal is approach health problems, from
intervention perspective or prevention view. Hence, the aim
of the present study was to determine if there is any relation
between sociodemographic aspects (age, education level,
family composition, gender and socioeconomic status) and
psychosocial factors (coping, spirituality, stressful life events
and dispositional optimism) in parents, teachers and young
people between 12 and 18 years old.
The present descriptive correlational study looked for
assessing the predictive association between sociodemo-
graphic variables such as age, gender, education level and
socioeconomic status and psychosocial factors as coping
styles, spirituality, stressful life events, family composition,
and dispositional optimism in parents, teachers and young
The sample was stratied by levels of intact groups; it
was composed by 319 male and female teenagers between
12 and 18 years old, with a median of 14.8 years. They were
students at three schools: one of them was mixed gender,
the other one was a female school and the other one was
a male school. It was possible to get contact with 138 pa-
rents or family caregivers and the sample also included 19
teachers qualied by the teenagers as a meaningful model.
Parents or family caregivers were in average 41.59 years
old with a standard deviation of 7.95 and a rank from 18
to 66 years old.
Dispositional Optimism Questionnaire (Cuestionario de
OptimismoDisposicional in original language): it is a test
designed by Londoño, Hernández, Alejo&Pulido (2013)
Colombian people. It assesses people´s trend to interpret in
a positive or negative way the situations, to wait for good
results and to provide personal resources in pro of getting the
solutions to daily events. The questionnaire has 20 items with
three answer options: one of them is pessimistic (centered
in the permanent expectancy that something wrong is going
to happen), the other one is an optimistic bias no realistic
(focused on waiting for something really good to happen no
matters the person’ action) and the last one is dispositional
optimism (permanent expectancy that something good will
happen with actions to facilitate it). To classify the prole,
the same options are used and they are the factors measured
through the items. The prole is obtained reviewing answer
trends and the factor average of them. The level of reliability
of the test is high with alpha of .85.
Questionnaire of coping forms (Cuestionario de formas
de afrontamiento in Spanish): This questionnaire was de-
veloped by Folkman and Lazarus and adapted to Spanish
population by Vitaliano, Russo, Carr, Maiuro and Becker
(1985). The adaptation to Colombia was made by Londoño
and Archila (2004) and revalidated by Rueda and Vélez-
Botero (2010), with 46 items clustered in seven subscales
or factors, measuring responses of people in daily stressful
situations. Coping styles measured by this test are: problem
– focused coping, self – blame, naive or illusory thinking,
social support search, minimizing the threat and mixed
style, with Likert scale 5 options from “always” to “never”.
Cronbach Alpha reached to Colombian population was .85.
Index of Spirituality and Wellness: Daaleman and Frey
(2004) developed this instrument to test spirituality and
wellbeing of people, with 12 items divided in two domains,
six of them regarding self – efcacy and the other six related
to vital scheme, independent one group from the other. The
scale has a good reliability level of .97. The instrument
includes statements related to 2 dimensions mentioned
above and people have to respond in Likert scale with 5
options from completely disagree to completely agree. The
higher scores indicate low feeling of inability, high sense
of vulnerability and lack of sense of life.
Stressful Life Events Scale (Escala de
AcontecimientosVitalesEstresantes): It was designed by
Oliva, Jiménez, Parra and Sánchez-Queijá (2008), based on
23 events previously classied for World Health Organization
as potentially stressful for most of young people. These
constanza londoño.indd 36 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people
events can be academic, familiar, peers and personal aspects.
Cronbach alpha is.72. The classication is obtained by adding
the number of stressful events experienced for people; the
scores are higher if the events have happened in the last year.
Sociodemographic data form: With this instrument was
collected information about date of birth (to calculate the age
at the moment of the study), education level (primary school,
high school, technical studies, university and postgraduate
degree), gender (male or female) and socioeconomic status
(based on public services bill from the place the people live) .
Stage 1: Selecting the sample. It was made after the
authorization to collect the information was obtained.
Stage 2: Data Collecting. The instruments were applied
in a group format with practitioners in psychology, after the
participants signed the informant consent (for young people
the format were signed for parents or family caregivers).
The application to parents or family caregivers was made by
the same trained team in a parent school meeting scheduled
by the schools. The application to teachers was done under
similar control conditions as well as with young people
and parents – family caregivers in a meeting scheduled by
the directors.
Stage 3: Creation of data bases and analysis of results.
The data bases were in SPSS format, compatible with AMOS
applicative to carry on purications of models and nally,
to determine the nal predictive model.
First of all, descriptive analysis about participants
and measured variables were made. In a second place,
an ANOVA was carried on, to determine if there were
signicant differences between psychosocial variables in
those people scoring high in dispositional optimism factor
in comparison to people scored high in pessimism factor.
Before the predictive model, correlative analyses were done
using statistics depending of the sort of variables measured
(Pearson, Spearman and Kendal) and a model was identied
using regression. At the end, a structural equation analysis
was made to identify the nal explicative model.
The sample was balanced in terms of gender; most of
the teenagers said they have socioeconomic status of 2 or
3; in a higher proportion they were the oldest son, then it
was the youngest member of the family and after that in a
lower proportion there were the middle siblings; most of
the 60% of the teenagers lived with nuclear families (father,
mother and sons) in average they were 5 people living in
the same house (Table 1)
Table 1.
Sociodemographic and family caractheristics of teenagers
Variable f % Variable f %
Gender Socioecon.
Male 165 51.7 1 43 13.5
Femaler 154 48.3 2 98 30.7
3 159 49.8
Place in
4 7 2.2
Onlychild 61 19.1
Younger son 72 22.6 Type of family
Middle son 61 19.1 Nuclear 204 63.9
Oldest son 109 34.2 Extensive 108 33.9
Twin 1 0.3 Other 7 2.2
X sd Min Max
4.74 1.85 2 15
Place at home 2.90 1.36 1 7
Notes: sd: standardesviation, f:frecuency.
Young people showed high scores in optimism (22.6),
low pessimism (2.17), an average of 4.58 stressful life events,
medium scores in spirituality (18.15), with avoiding coping
(2.70) and self – blame (2.85). Regarding gender and coping
styles with ANOVA, there were no signicant differences.
constanza londoño.indd 37 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
Constanza Londoño Pérez, MarCeLa VeLasCo saLaManCa, IVonne aLejo Castañeda,
PauLa Botero soto, IVonne joLIet Vanegas
Table 2.
Descriptive statistics of optimism, coping and spirituality in young people
Variable Male Female Min Max X sd
X sd X sd
Optimism 50.30 10.11
14 29 22.60 4.05
Pessimism 2.01 1.74 1.98 1.82 0 8 2.17 2.02
StressfulLifeEvents 2.88 2.40 5.24 2.86 0 10 4.58 2.98
Spirituality 17.49 5.74
3.48 0 30 18.15 5.05
Problemsolving 2.56 0.39 2.64 0.32 1.33 3.47 2.59 0.40
Social supportsearch 2.45 0.57 2.46 0.50 1.33 3.83 2.44 0.55
Avoidingstyle 2.64 0.30 2.79 0.28 1.90 3.60 2.70 0.35
Fantasy 2.35 0.64 2.45 0.63 1.00 3.43 2.39 0.67
Self - blame 2.67 0.47 2.83 0.45 1.00 4.00 2.85 0.59
Notes: sd: standardesviation
In the group of parents or family caregivers, they were
highly optimistic (23.67) with coping centered in avoiding
(2.64) and self – blame (2.56). They reported 3.17 stressful
life events and a high level of spirituality (20.13)
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of optimism, coping and spirituality in
parents or family caregivers.
Variable Min Max X sd
Optimism 14 29 23.67 3.78
Pessimism 0 9 1.75 1.89
Problemsolving 0.60 3.13 2.22 0.48
Social supportsearch 0.67 3.83 2.51 0.68
Avoidingstyle 0.00 3.60 2.64 0.60
Fantasy 0.43 4.00 2.38 0.68
Self - blame 0.00 4.00 2.56 0.83
StressfulLifeEvents 0 10 3.17 2.32
Spirituality 0 28 20.13 6.24
Notes: sd: standardesviation.
In the case of teachers, it was a high level of optimism
(23.73), coping focused on avoiding, followed by fantasy
trend (2.85) and social support search (2.83).
Comparing teenagers with optimistic bias trend no
realistic and teenagers with pessimistic trend regarding
the measured variables, it was found that optimistic
teenagers had emotion – focused coping, especially with
avoiding style (p = .00), fantasy (p = .012) and self –
blame (p = .04). This comparison was possible because
the subgroups were formed with 30 teenagers or more.
Table 4.
Descriptive statistics of optimism, coping and spirituality in
Variable Min Max X sd
Optimism 13 28 23.73 4.01
Pessimism 0 11 1.00 1.71
Problemsolving 1.87 2.80 2.30 0.27
Social supportsearch
1.83 3.67 2.83 0.49
Avoidingstyle 2.30 3.70 3.07 0.41
Fantasy 2.14 3.29 2.85 0.31
Self - blame 1.25 3.25 2.82 0.35
1 7 3.92 1.25
Spirituality 1 27 12.42 4.49
Notes: sd: standardesviation
In the bivariate correlational analysis, all the possible
matches were reviewed between the teenagers’ variables,
between teenagers, parents and teachers variables. Only
signicant and direct associations between high optimism,
avoiding coping and self –blame were found, as well as
avoiding style in teenagers and the amount of stressful life
events reported by parents.
Table 5.
Comparison ANOVA between optimistic and pessimistic
teenagers regarding psychosocial variables.
constanza londoño.indd 38 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people
Variable F p.
Avoiding 5.255 .00
Fantasy 2.828 .01
Self – Blame 3.379 .04
Notes: p: signicancelevel.
In addition, significant indirect associations were
found between the amount of stressful life events re-
ported by teenagers and avoiding style, between social
support searching styles in teenagers and avoiding
style in parents, between problem – focused coping
in teenagers and self – blame style in parents (Table
6). All the variables with the highest correlation were
included, because in exploratory studies is necessary
to recognize as many intervening factors as possible
in a phenomenon.
The multivariant analysis with the outcome variable
(dispositional optimism) generated a model with 34% of
variance explained, including teenagers variables as social support searching style and fantasy, parents or family caregivers’
variables as problem – focused coping and support search style (Table 7).
Table 6.
Correlations between teenagers and parents scores in the measured variables.
Teenagers Parents
Teenagers Pessimism Avoiding Self -
Blame Avoiding Self
- Blame SLE
Optimism -.627*.369** .296*
Pessimism -.379**
Problemsolving -.400** -.336*
Social support -.272*
Avoiding .266*
Notes. SLE: Stressful Life Events, *p =.05; ** p = .01
Table 7.
Predictive model of optimism in teenagers.
t p
B sd Beta
1 (Constant) - 6.12 6.86
- 0.89 0.37 - 19.94 7.69
TeenagerCoping Style
ProblemSolving 3.75 1.43 0.37
2.62 0.01 0.87 6.63
Social Support - 3.26 1.02 - 0.44
- 3.17 0.00 - 5.33 - 1.19
Fantasy - 4.60 1.74 - 0.68
- 2.64 0.01 - 8.10 - 1.09
Problem – FocusedCoping 5.22 1.74 0.74
2.98 0.00 1.69 8.74
Social Support Search Coping Style - 3.86 1.46 - 0.65
- 2.64 0.01 - 6.80 - 0.92
Outcome Variable: Optimism in teenagers
constanza londoño.indd 39 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
constanza londoño pérez, marcela Velasco salamanca, iVonne alejo castañeda,
paula Botero soto, iVonne joliet Vanegas
The structural equation model explained 41% of the variance and the predicting factors of dispositional optimisms in
teenagers were: problem solving coping in parents, fantasy style in teenagers, with a negative relationship with social support
searching style in parents and self – blame in teenagers.
of the teachers variables were taken into the model. Thereby,
null hypothesis is accepted, because it looks like there is no
relationship between socioeconomic level, family compo-
sition, gender and spirituality with dispositional optimism
in the group of teenagers.
Regarding spirituality, that previously had been associated
to better answers in stressful situations (Johnson, Sheets,
&Kristeller, 2008; Kaskutas, Turk, Bond &Weisner, 2008;
Pardini et al., 2000), it is recommended to make further
investigations, using instruments more elaborated than the
interview used in the present study and even recon rm the
present results about spirituality, in terms of the moderate
level found in teenagers versus high level of spirituality
in parents.
On one hand, the results indicate optimism is a learnt
dimension of the personality, its appearance is mediated for
individual variables such as personal tendency to look for
social support and fantasy as a way to imagine the possible
solutions of the dif cult situation (Seligman, 2005), as well
as parents variables such as the tendency to solve problems
and looking for social support. Searching social support was
identi ed by Taylor & Stanton (2007) as a strategy that is not
negative or maladaptive, people can look for help in other
people, enhancing real and perceived social support, with
the feeling they are important to others. However, searching
social support is bene cial in the solution of situations when
the individual keep the responsibility on the situation and
does not charge the other people with it.
of the teachers variables were taken into the model. Thereby,
null hypothesis is accepted, because it looks like there is no
relationship between socioeconomic level, family compo-
sition, gender and spirituality with dispositional optimism
in the group of teenagers.
Regarding spirituality, that previously had been associated
to better answers in stressful situations (Johnson, Sheets,
Pardini et al., 2000), it is recommended to make further
investigations, using instruments more elaborated than the
interview used in the present study and even recon rm the
present results about spirituality, in terms of the moderate
level found in teenagers versus high level of spirituality
in parents.
On one hand, the results indicate optimism is a learnt
dimension of the personality, its appearance is mediated for
individual variables such as personal tendency to look for
social support and fantasy as a way to imagine the possible
Figure 1.Predictive model of dispositional optimism.
Discussion and Conclusions
In summary, the predictive model of dispositional op-
timism explained 43% of variance and included teenagers’
variables as social support search style, fantasy and self –
blame, parents and family caregivers’ variables as problem
solving coping and social support searching style and none
constanza londoño.indd 40 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people
Carver and Connor-Smith (2010) propose that if the coping
strategy is focused only on relieving emotions, coping can
be considered inappropriate, because the individual does not
look for a real solution but he is trying to feel discomfort.
Then, the person who looks for social support to unbur-
den or resolve the situation is more consistent with dispo-
sitional optimistic style and the social group is considered
as an important resource in the solution of stressful events
(Birditt&Antonucci, 2008; Moser, 2009; Sohl& Moyer,
2009). The individual assumes responsibility by making
behaviors and actions oriented to solve the problem under
an optimistic sight of the possibility of reach the desired
results (Augusto Landa, Aguilar-Luzón, &Salguero Duarte,
2008;Cabarcas&Londoño, 2014). This trend to look for social
support, from a positive perspective has been reviewed for
some authors as a way to optimize resources in the pretention
to get a solution (Gison et al., 2014; Oreskovic& Goodman,
2013; Senkus et al., 2014).
On the other hand, the benecial optimism in teenagers
is also associated to coping focused on fantasy, in which
person leads the effort in imagination of ideal situations
where the solution is achievable and accessible. There was
said before that optimistic people have some imaginative
capacity (Seligman, 2005), so the hope is about the good
results will happen and they are visualized (Samper, Mestre,
Tur,& Cortés, 2008). This strategy helps the individual to
release tension and thinking clearer about the solutions and
options, but this style is not benecial without problem
solving style, in which the individual is responsible of the
situation. Nonetheless, the ndings are not completely
conclusive and it is necessary to carry on more studies to
identify two types of coping person with the tendency to
look for social support.
Furthermore, the coping styles like social support sear-
ching and fantasy are combined with self – blame, in which
the individual thinks problems are associated to personal
behavior. In this sense, Martinez-Correa et al. (2006) and
Marrero andCaballeira (2010) studies showed optimistic
people use self – criticism to determine the level of perso-
nal responsibility in the situation and to regulate their own
behavior. Still, it has to be done more research to see if
coping oriented to self – blame includes some characteristics
of self – criticism and in this way, promote positive results
and great adjustment in the stressful situation.
Dispositional optimism of teenagers was associated to the
existence of mixed coping style in parents, in which social
support searching and problem solving styles are combined.
It is possible that parents have been models of mixed styles,
inuencing the optimistic point of view of teenagers, but
it was not associated to father´s optimism. Some authors
like Ortíz et al. (2003) and Vera-Villaroel and Guerrero
(2003) had noticed in their studies the relationship between
parent’s typical coping style and teenagers ‘coping styles;
also, they found a close relation between teenager optimism
and positive skills in solving social problems (Hernández
&Londoño, 2013). In the same direction, Solís and Vidal
(2006) have proposed a link between family models of
coping and coping showed by teenagers.
Most of the teenagers who participated in the study were
low and middle class in the socioeconomic level (status 2 and
3), living with a nuclear family, in average with 5 members
inside the family and 15 people at the same place. However,
none of these variables were signicantly related to high
scores of optimism. They showed high scores of optimism
and there were no signicant differences in media scores
between teenagers, parents and meaning teachers. Taylor
and Staton (2007) identied a moderate optimistic trend with
better capacity to deal with stressful events, the person waits
for positive results as well as a feeling to be able to execute
more control on the situation. Nonetheless, the tendency
to emotion – focused coping can mark the difference and
it makes the level of adjustment is not optimal, because
the incontrollable and permanent event of stress has been
associated with poor adjustment to diseases (Gison et al.,
2014; Oreskovic& Goodman, 2013; Senkus et al., 2014)
and other stressful situations. Thus, the action would be
oriented to change the emotion and no the situation as it is
expected (Gordon et al., 2002; Velasco, Botero&Londoño,
2011). Emotion – focused coping has been found frequently
in young people no matters gender, as it was found in this and
others studies (Hampel&Petermann, 2006), these strategies
are centered in control of the moment and release the ten-
sion more than the option of visualize requirements in long
term. Other investigations have found gender differences
(Babakhani, 2011; Becker & Curry, 2006; Klimstra et al.,
2009; Mpofu& Thomas, 2006; Renk&Creasey, 2003) but
in populations of different cultures and that could be the
reason of the difference with the present study.
In this sense, a lot of studies have been found that exa-
ggerated optimism make people to ignore the real limitations,
because they think that independently the conditions and
their behaviors, the outcomes always will be good (Ridder
et al., 2004, Larsman, Eklof, &Torner, 2012; Seligman,
2005;Covey & Davies, 2004; El-Anzi, 2005), but with
signicant differences between those with an optimistic bias
no realistic and the pessimistic people: extreme optimistic
tended to have more styles focused on avoiding, fantasy
and self – blame than pessimistic people.
constanza londoño.indd 41 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
constanza londoño pérez, marcela Velasco salamanca, iVonne alejo castañeda,
paula Botero soto, iVonne joliet Vanegas
Previous studies like Folkman and Moskowitz (2004)
and Sandín (2002) have been shown that in general, no
matters the predominant style, there is a tendency to regulate
negative emotions as rst reactions in coping, interfering
with actions and effective solutions of the problems. This
regulation can be through avoiding, fantasy or self – blame
as in the case of teenagers, or can be through social support
searching and avoiding as in the case of parents.
Pessimism was related to less fantasy, avoiding and
self – blame, in opposition to previous researches showing
a marked tendency in pessimistic people to self – blame in
the situations, considering as internal and stables the causes
of them, associated with personal characteristics and low
capacity of modication (Remor et al., 2006). Likewise,
teenagers reported more stressful life events in less time,
in comparison with parents and teachers, but due to the
unequal sizes in the groups, these comparisons have to be
taken carefully.
Regarding coping styles in teenagers and their association
with parents coping styles, it was found as in other studies
(Solís& Vidal, 2006) that problem solving style in teena-
gers was negative associated to avoiding and self – blame
style in parents. At the same time, social support style in
teenagers was negative related to avoiding style in parents.
These results mean that if parents were less avoiding and
focused on self – blame, the teenagers would show more
strategies centered in problem solving and social support.
There are some limitations to be present related to the
results. One of them is the difculty in the parents’ interview
that leaded to lost 100 teenagers data. Other limitation is
the interview used to measure spirituality because there is
no validate instrument to Colombian population. The other
limitation is the type of transversal study, because the results
and the model have been conrmed in future studies.
Archila, D., &Londoño, C. (2004).Afrontamiento y consumo de cigarri-
llo en universitarios. Experiencias Investigativas. Universidad Santo
Augusto Landa, J., Aguilar-Luzón, M., & Salguero de Ugarte, M. (2008).
El papel de la IEP y del optimismo/pesimismo disposicional en la
resolución de problemas sociales: un estudio con alumnos de trabajo
social. Revista Electrónica de InvestigaciónPsicoeducativa, 6, 363-382.
Recuperado de:
Babakhani, N. (2011). The effects of social skills training on self- esteem
and aggression male adolescents.Procedia -Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 30, 1565–1570. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.304
Becker S., & Curry J. (2006). Interactive Effect of Substance Abuse and
Depression on Adolescent Social Competence.Journal of Clinical
Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 469-475. doi: 10.1037/a0025754.
Birditt, K., &Antonucci, T. C. (2008) Life sustaining irritations?Relationship
quality and mortality in the context of chronic illness.Social Science
& Medicine, 67, 1291-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.06.029
Black, J. & Reynolds, W. (2013).Examining the relationship of perfectio-
nism, depression, and optimism: Testing for mediation and moderation.
Personality and Individual Differences, 54 (3),426-431. doi: 10.1016/j.
Boswell, G. H., Kahana, E., & Dilworth-Anderson, P. A. (2006). Spiritua-
lity and Healthy lifestyle behaviors: Stress Counter-balancing effects
on the well-being of older adults. Journal of Religion and Health,
Brannon, L. &Feist, J. (2001).Psicología de la Salud. Madrid: Paraninfo
Thomson Learning.
Britton, A.,Sliter, M., &Jex, S. (2012).Is the glass really half-full? The
reverse-buffering effect of optimism on undermining behavior.Per-
sonality and Individual Differences, 52 (6), 712-717. doi: 10.1016/j.
Cabarcas, K. y Londoño, C. (2014). Trastornos de la conducta alimen-
taria, imagen corporal, afrontamiento y optimismo como predictores
de aceptación de cirugías plásticas cosméticas. Psicología y Salud.,
24 (2), 199-219.
Carver C. & Connor-Smith J. (2010).Personality and Coping.An-
nual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.
Carver, S., Scheier, M., &Segerstrom, S. (2010).Optimism.Clinical Psy-
chology Review, 30 879–889. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006
Castro, M. J. (2002). Anorexia Nerviosa. Guías Clínicas, 2, 1-4.
Chico, E. (2002). Optimismo disposicional como predictor de estrategias
de afrontamiento. Psicothema,14, 544-550.
Cho, D. & Park, C. (2013). Crecimiento tras el trauma: Revisión general
y estado actual. TerapiaPsicológica, 31 (1), 69-79. doi:
Brannon, L. &Feist, J. (2001).Psicología de la Salud. Madrid: Paraninfo
Thomson Learning.
Britton, A.,Sliter, M., &Jex, S. (2012).Is the glass really half-full? The
reverse-buffering effect of optimism on undermining behavior.Per-
sonality and Individual Differences, 52 (6), 712-717. doi: 10.1016/j.
Cabarcas, K. y Londoño, C. (2014). Trastornos de la conducta alimen-
taria, imagen corporal, afrontamiento y optimismo como predictores
de aceptación de cirugías plásticas cosméticas. Psicología y Salud.,
24 (2), 199-219.
Carver C. & Connor-Smith J. (2010).Personality and Coping.An-
nual Review of Psychology, 61, 679-704. doi: 10.1146/annurev.
Carver, S., Scheier, M., &Segerstrom, S. (2010).Optimism.Clinical Psy-
chology Review, 30 879–889. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006
Castro, M. J. (2002). Anorexia Nerviosa. Guías Clínicas, 2, 1-4.
Chico, E. (2002). Optimismo disposicional como predictor de estrategias
de afrontamiento. Psicothema,14, 544-550.
Cho, D. & Park, C. (2013). Crecimiento tras el trauma: Revisión general
y estado actual. TerapiaPsicológica, 31 (1), 69-79. doi:
Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J. K., Salzman, H., Harding, B., Thomsen,
A., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001).Coping with stress during childhood and
adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research.
Psychological Bulletin 127, 87-127. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
Covey, A., & Davies, D. M. (2004). Are people little realistic optimist?
She depends how you ask to him? British Journal of Health Psychology,
1, 11–39. doi: 10.1348/135910704322778713
Daaleman, T. P., & Frey, B. (2004). The Spirituality Index of Well-Being:
A New Instrument for Health-Related Quality-of-Life Research. Annals
of Family Medicine, 2, 406 – 411. doi: 10.1348/135910709X479799
El-Anzi, F. O. (2005).Academic achievement and its relationship with
anxiety, self-esteem, optimism, and pessimism in Kuwaiti students.
Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 33, 95–104.
constanza londoño.indd 42 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
What makes us optimistic? : psychosocial factors as predictors of dispositional optimism in young people
Fischer, R. & Chalmers, A. (2008).Is optimism universal? A meta-analyti-
cal investigation of optimism levels across 22 nations. Personality and
Individual Differences, 45, 378-382.
Folkman, S.&Moskowitz, J. T. (2004).Coping: pitfalls and promise.Annual
Review. Psychology, 55,745-774. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037
Fried, T. Redding, C., Robbins, M.,Paiva, a., O’Leary, J., &Iannon, L.
(2012). Promoting advance care planning as health behavior change: De-
velopment of scales to assess decisional balance, medical and religious
beliefs, and processes of change. Patient Education and Counseling, 86
(1), 25-32.doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.035
Garnefski, N., &Kraaij, V. (2002). Relationships between cognitive emo-
tion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study
of ve specic samples. Journal of Adolescent Health, 30, 326-335.
Gison, A., Dall’armi, V., Donati, V., Rizza, F., &Giaquinto, S. (2014).Dis-
positional optimism and Parkinson’s disease.Annals of Physical and Re-
habilitation Medicine, 57 (1), e364.doi: 10.11138/FNeur/2014.29.1.005
Glozah, F. &Pevalin, D. (2014).Social support, stress, health, and aca-
demic success in Ghanaian adolescents: A path analysis. Journal of
Adolescence, 37 (4), 451-460.doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.010
Gómez, C. &Londoño, C. (2013).Modelo predictor del consumo res-
ponsable de alcohol y el comportamiento típicamente no violento en
adolescentes. Salud y Drogas, 13 (1) 23-33. Recuperado de: www.
Hampel, P., &Petermann, F. (2006). Perceived stress, coping, and ad-
justment in adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 409-415.
Hasanović, M.&Pajević,I. (2012).Religious moral believes and quality
of life amongst war veterans in Bosnia and Herzegovina negatively
associated with severity of trauma experiences and anxiety. Euro-
peanPsychiatry, 27 (1),1. Recuperado de: http://www.sciencedirect.
Hernández L., & Londoño, C. (2013). Imagen corporal, IMC, afronta-
miento, depresión y riesgo de TCA en jóvenes universitarios. Anales
de Psicología, 29 (3), 748-761.
Jaser, S., Champion, J., Reeslund, K., Keller, G., Merchant, MJ., Benson,
M., & Compas, B. (2007). Cross-situational coping with peer and family
stressors in adolescent offspring of depressed parents.ScienceDirect.
Journal of Adolescence, 30, 917-932.
Johnson, T. J., Sheets, V. L., &Kristeller, J. L. (2008).Identifying mediators
of the relationship between religiousness/spirituality and alcohol use.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 69 (1), 160-170.
Kaskutas, L. Turk, N., Bond, J., &Weisner, C. (2008).Spirituality evidence
based medicine, and alcoholics anonymous, American Journal Psychia-
try, 165, 1514-1517. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050678
Kazemi, M. S. (2012). The relationship between religious coping strategies
and mental health in MS patient.Procedia - Social and Behavioral Scien-
ces, 5,1387-1389.doi:
Kennedy, D. K.& Hughes, B. M. (2004). The optimism-neuroticism
question: an evaluation based on cardiovascular reactivity in female
college students. The Psychological Record, 54, 373.
Kim, Y., &Seidlitz L., (2002). Spirituality moderates the effect of stress
on emotional and physical adjustment. Personality and Individual
Differences, 32, 1377-1390. doi:
Klimstra T., Hale W., Raaijmakers Q., Branje S., &Meeus W. (2009).
Maturation of Personality in Adolescence.Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 96, 898-912.doi: 10.1037/a0014746
Lazarus, R., &Folkman, S. (1986). Estrés y Procesos Cognitivos. Madrid
España: Martinez Roca.
Lench. H. C., &Ditto, P. H. (2008). Automatic optimism: Biased use
of base rate information for positive and negative events. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 631-639.
Lillis, J., Gifford, E., Humphreys, K., & Moss, R. (2008).Assessing spiri-
tuality/religiosity in treatment environment: the treatment spirituality/
religiosity scale.Journal Substance Abuse Treat, 35, 427-433.
Litwinczuk, K. M., & Groh, C. J. (2008). The Relationship Between
Spirituality, Purpose in Life, and Well-Being in HIV-Positive Persons.
Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS care,18, 13-22. doi:
Londoño, C., Hernández, L., Alejo, I., & Pulido, D (2013). Diseño y
validación del cuestionario de optimismo disposicional/pesimismo
EOP. Universitas Psychologyca, 12 (1), 139-155.
Londoño, C. (2009) Optimismo & salud positiva como predictores de
la adaptación a la vida universitaria. Acta Colombiana de Psicología,
12, 95 – 107.
Lucchetti, G., Lucchetti, A., &Koenig, H. (2011). Impact of spirituality/
religiosity on mortality: comparison with other health interventions.
The Journal of Science and Healing, 7 (4),234-238.doi: 10.1016/j.
Lyon, M., Garvie, P., Kao, E., Briggs, L., He, J., Malow, R., D’Angelo,
l., &McCarte, R. (2011). Spirituality in HIV-infected Adolescents
and Their Families: family centered (face) advance care planning and
medication adherence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 48 (6), 633-636.
Marrero, R., &Caballeira, M. (2010). El papel del optimismo y del apoyo
social en el bienestar subjetivo. Salud Mental,3, 39-46.
Martínez-Correa, A., Reyes del Paso, G., García-León, A., & González-
Jareño, M. (2006). Optimismo /pesimismo disposicional y estrategias
de afrontamiento del estrés. Psicothema, 18, 66-77.
McCullough, M. E. &Laurenceau, J. P. (2005). Gender and the natural
history of self-rated health: Findings from a 59-year longitudinal study.
Health Psychology, 23, 651-655.
Morales, A., Arenas, M.D., Reig-Ferrer, A., Álvarez-Ude, F., Malek, T.,
Gil, E., y Cotilla, E.M. (2011). Optimismo disposicional en pacientes
en hemodiálisis y su inuencia en el curso de la enfermedad. Revis-
taNefrología, 31, 199-205.
Moreira-Almeida, A., & Koenig, H. G.(2006). A cross-cultural study of
spirituality, religion, and personal, beliefs as components of quality of
life.Social Science & Medicine, 62, 1486-1497.
Moser, G. (2009) Quality of life and sustainability: Toward person–envi-
ronment congruity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1, 351-357.
Mpofu, E. & Thomas K. (2006). Classroom Racial Proportion: Inuence
on Self-Concept and Social Competence in Zimbabwean Adolescents.
The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167, 93-111.
Oliva, A., Jiménez, J., Parra, Á., y Sánchez- Queija, I. (2008). Aconteci-
mientos vitales estresantes, resiliencia y ajuste adolescente. Revista de
Psicopatología y Psicología Clínica, 13, 53-62.
Oreskovic, N. & Goodman, E. (2013).Association of optimism with
cardiometabolic risk in adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Health, 52
(4), 407-412.doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.011
Ortiz, J., Ramos, N., & Vera-Villarroel, P. E. (2003).Optimismo y Salud:
estado actual e implicaciones para la Psicología Clínica y de la Salud.
Suma Psicológica, 10, 119-134.
Pardini, D., Plante, T. G., Sherman, A., &Stump, J. E. (2000). Religious
faith and spirituality in substance abuse recovery: Determining the men-
tal health benets. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 19, 347-354.
Patzelt, H. & Shepherd, D. (2011).Negative emotions of an entrepre-
neurial career: Self-employment and regulatory coping behaviors.
Journal of Business Venturing, 26 (2), 226-238.doi: 10.1016/j.jbus-
Perera, H. &McIlveen, P. (2014). The role of optimism and engagement
coping in college adaptation: A career construction model. Journal of
Vocational Behavior, 84 (3), 395-404.doi:
Ragsdale, J., Hegner, M., & Davies, S. (2014). Identifying religious and/or
spiritual perspectives of adolescents and young adults receiving blood
and marrow transplants: a prospective qualitative study.Biology of
Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 20 (8), 1242-1247. doi: 10.1016/j.
Remor, R., Amorós, M., &Carboles, J. (2006).El optimismo y la expe-
riencia de ira en relación con el Malestar físico. Anales de Psicología,
22, 37–44.
Renk, K., &Creasey, G. (2003).The relationship of gender, gender identity,
and coping strategies in late adolescents.Journal of Adolescence, 26,
159–168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00135-5
constanza londoño.indd 43 08-10-14 18:04
TERAPIA PSICOLÓGICA 2014, Vol. 32, Nº 1, 41-46
constanza londoño pérez, marcela Velasco salamanca, iVonne alejo castañeda,
paula Botero soto, iVonne joliet Vanegas
Ridder, D., Schreurs, K., &Bensing, J. (2004). The relative benets of
being optimistic: Optimism as a coping resource in multiple sclerosis
and Parkinson’ disease. British Journal of Health Psychology, 5,141.
Robinson, E. A., Cranford, J. A., Webb, J. R., & Brower, K. J. (2007).
Six-month changes in spirituality, religiousness, and heavy drinking in a
treatment-seeking sample. JournalStudies Alcohol Drugs, 68, 282-290.
Rueda, C.&Vélez-Botero, H. (2010). Características psicométricas de un
cuestionario de estilo de afrontamiento. Típica Boletín Electrónico de
Salud Escolar, 6 (2), art.5. Recuperado de:
Salas, J. (2008). Control, health and welfare.Suma Psicológica, 15, 15-42
Samper P., Mestre A., Tur M., & Cortes M. (2008). Agresividad y afron-
tamiento en la adolescencia. Unaperspectiva intercultural.Internationa-
lJournal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy.8, 431-440.
Sandín, B. (2002). El estrés: Un análisis basado en el papel de los factores
sociales. RevistaInternacional de PsicologíaClínica y de la Salud, 3,
Scheier, M. F.& Carver, C. S. (1985) Optimism, coping and health: As-
sessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies. Health
Psychology, 4, 219-247.
Scheier, M.F. & Carver, C.S. (2014).Dispositional optimism.Trends in
Cognitive Sciences, 18 (6), 293-299.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097752
Searward, G., & Kemp, S. (2000). Optimism bias and student debt.New
Zealand Journal of Psychology, 29, 17-25.
Seligman, M. (2005). La auténticafelicidad.Barcelona, España: Ediciones B.
Senkus, E., Cardoso, F., & Pagan, O. (2014). Time for more optimism in
metastatic breast cancer?Cancer Treatment Reviews, 40 (2), 220-228.
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2013.09.015
Shinall, M.,Ehrenfeld, J., &Guillamondegui, O. (2014).Religiously af-
liated intensive care unit patients receive more aggressive end-of-life
care. Journal of Surgical Research, 190 (2),623-627. doi: 10.1016/j.
Siegel, K., &Schrimshaw, E.W. (2002).The perceived benets of religious
and spiritual coping among older adults living with HIV/AIDS.Journal
of the Scientic Study of Religion.41, 91-102. doi: 10.1111/1468-
Sohl, S. J., & Moyer, A. (2009).Rening the conceptualization of a future-
oriented self-regulatory behavior: Proactive coping.Personality and
Individual Differences. 47, 139 – 44.
Solis, C., & Vidal, A. (2006). Estilos y estrategias de afrontamiento en
adolescentes. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental HermilioValdizan,
6, 33-39.
Soo Y., Lee, H. O., Fitzpatrick, J. J., Kim, S., Marui, E., Lee, J. S., &
Cook, P. (2009). Spirituality, Depression, Living Alone, and Perceived
Health Among Korean Older Adults in the Community. Archives of
Psychiatric Nursing,23 (4), 309-322.
Taylor, S.E. (2007). Psicología de la Salud. México: Mc Graw Hill.
Taylor, S. E. & Stanton, A.L. (2007). Coping resources, coping processes,
and mental health.AnnualReview of Clinical Psychology 3, 377-401.
Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W. R.,&Schermer, C. (2002).Atheists, agnostics
and Alcoholics Anonymous.Journal of studies on alcohol, 63,534-41.
Tuck, I., Alleyne, R., &Thinganjana, W. (2006). Spirituality and Stress
Management in Healthy Adults.Journal Journal Holistic Nursing, 24,
245-253. doi: 10.1177/0898010106289842
Velasco, M., Botero, P., &Londoño, C. (2011). Calidad de vida y potencial
humano. En: C. Londoño. Eds. Avances y Perspectivas en Psicología
de la Salud.(pp. 91-125). Bogotá: División de Psicología de la Salud-
Vera-Villarroel, P., & Guerrero, A. (2003). Diferencias en habilidades de
resolución de problemas sociales en sujetos optimistas y pesimistas.
UniversitasPsychologica, 2, 21-26.
Vera-Villarroel, P., Córdova-Rubio, N., & Celis-Atenas, K. (2009).
Evaluación del optimismo: un análisis preliminar del LifeOrientation
Test versión revisada (LOT-R) en población chilena. UniversitasPsy-
chologica,8, 61-67.
Vitaliano, P. P., Russo, J., Carr, J. E., Maiuro, R. D., & Becker, J. (1985).
The ways of coping checklist: Revision and psychometric properties.
Multivariate Behavioural Research, 20, 3-26.
Zlatev, M., Pahl, S., & White, M. (2010). Perceived risk and bene-
t for self and others as predictors of smokers’ attitudes towards
smoking restrictions. Psychology & Health, 25, 167-182. doi:
Weaver, A. J., & Flannelly, K. (2004).The role of religion/spirituality
for cancer patients and their caregivers.Southern Medical Journal, 97,
constanza londoño.indd 44 08-10-14 18:04
... A factor expected to predict hospital stress is life orientation that has two dimensions, namely optimism and pessimism. Optimism and pessimism are defined Optimists believe that the dreams are achievable while pessimists are not hopeful about the future (9)(10)(11). Research has shown that optimism and pessimism are associated with important indicators of mental health (12). ...
Full-text available
Background: Hospital stress is one of the most important factors in nurses' mental health. So, this study aimed to investigate the effects of self-actualization and life orientation on hospital stress. Methods: This research was a correlational study. We analyzed the data via multiple regression and SPSS version 22. Participants included 178 female nurses from Borujerd city, Lorestan Province, Iran, selected by simple random selection method. They completed hospital stress, self-actualization, and life orientation scales. Results: Results showed that self-actualization (β=-0.29, P=0.001) and optimistic orientation (β=-0.28, P=0.001) were significant negative predictors of hospital stress, but pessimistic orientation was not a predictor. Also, the results showed that 29% of variable hospital stress was explained by the proposed model. Conclusions: According to the results of this study, increased self-actualization and optimism reduced hospital stress in female nurses.
... Optimism is defined as a general expectation of positive experiences rather than negative experiences in the future (Joshi and Srivastava, 2009). Optimism is a positive vision of individual satisfaction in achieving future goals in several programs (Salamanca, 2014). Optimism is a tendency to expect good and see events and situations positively (Hasnain, 2014). ...
Full-text available
Generally, teenagers in an orphanage have had problems with their environment,friends, and society. So that they have low optimism in facing their future. This study aims to determine whether there is a relationship between social support and optimism for the future of adolescents in the Salatiga Islamic orphanage. The research subjects were adolescents at the Salatiga Islamic orphanage who were taken using a purposive sampling technique with a total of 120 subjects, consisting of 52.5% boys and 47.5% girls. The data was collected using a social support scale and a future optimism scale. Data analysis was processed using statistical regression analysis techniques. The analysis showed a significant positive relationship between social support and optimism for the future of adolescents in the orphanage. Abstrak Remaja di panti asuhan pada umumnya pernah mempunyai masalah terhadaplingkungannya, teman, dan masyarakat. Sehingga mempunyai optimisme yangrendah dalam menghadapi masa depannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah ada hubungan antara dukungan sosial dan optimisme masadepan remaja di panti asuhan Islam Salatiga. Subyek penelitian adalah remajadi panti asuhan Islam Salatiga yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknikpurposive sampling dengan jumlah subjek 120 orang, terdiri atas 52,5% remajalaki-laki dan 47,5% remaja perempuan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan denganmenggunakan skala dukungan social dan skala optimisme masa depan. Analisisdata diolah dengan teknik statistik analisis regresi. Hasil analisis menunjukkanhubungan positif signifikan antara dukungan sosial dan optimism masa depanremaja di panti asuhan.
... Aunque varios estudios han confirmado que las personas al final de la adolescencia tienen una curva optimista que decrece con la edad probablemente debido a que los eventos vitales estresantes van disminuyendo el optimismo no realista y lo convierten en una forma más positiva de esperar que acontezcan eventos positivos sin sobrestimar las posibilidades (Londoño, 2009;Londoño, Velasco, Alejo, Botero, & Vanegas, 2014;Martin, 2002). Sin embargo, Seligman (2003) encontró que las personas adultas eran más optimistas que personas jóvenes y adolescentes. ...
Full-text available
Esta investigación tenía como objetivo determinar si el estilo de afrontamiento, el optimismo disposicional, la depresión, la imagen corporal, el riesgo de padecer un trastorno de conducta alimentaria, el índice de masa corporal y la edad, en interacción, predicen la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en una muestra de 411 personas de 15 a 70 años. Se utilizó el Cuestionario de Estilos de Afrontamiento, el Cuestionario de optimismo disposicional, el Cuestionario Beck de depresión segunda versión, medidas directas para calcular el Índice de masa corporal, el Cuestionario de Imagen corporal y el Cuestionario de Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud SF 36. Los resultados indican que la depresión y la insatisfacción con la imagen corporal afectan negativamente la calidad de vida, mientras que el optimismo disposicional la potencia; además tanto la salud mental como padecer dolor merman la calidad de vida relacionada especialmente en adulto mayor.
... Optimism motivates people, not only cancer patients to form positive feelings towards life in general and more specifically future so they can easily recover from their physical illnesses. Optimism or feeling optimistic also enhances the individual's ability not only to cope with positive attitudes but also negative ones (Pérez, Salamanca, Castañeda, Soto, & Vanegas, 2014). ...
Full-text available
The present study aimed to examine the relationship between death anxiety, optimism and religiosity among cancer patients. The sample consisted of (42) adults who were all suffering from cancer. Three main scales namely, death anxiety scale, optimism scale and religiosity scale were developed by the researcher and then used in the present study to collect data. Pearson Correlation Coefficient (-0.38) showed that the relationship between death anxiety and optimism was statistically significant. On the other hand, the relationship between death anxiety and religiosity was also statistically significant as Pearson Correlation Coefficient was (-0.34). Furthermore, regression and prediction coefficients (stepwise) showed that death anxiety could be predicted by optimism and religiosity. therefore the need for the preparation of programs for the counseling for cancer patients to reduce the death anxiety fells and increase their level of optimism.
... Optimism manifests in the favorable expectations related to the occurrence of upcoming events [29]. It tends to be stable, as it is configured as a system of beliefs [30] [31], which can be supported by objective or subjective information, reliable or not [32] and be general or specific to a particular context, like work for example [33]. In that context optimistic people can expect good results related to what they themselves will be able to achieve or what the team or the company can achieve. ...
The purpose of the study. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted sporting events, which led to the cancellation of games and student-athletes being isolated at home and conducting their training online. The study looked at how student-athletes view themselves and their levels of optimism before and during the pandemic. Materials and methods. The study is a descriptive quantitative research that adapted the constructs of the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) and Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Slovin’s formula and stratified random sampling were used to select the respondents. Google Form was used to gather data on the 154 UST-IPEA student-athletes. For data analysis, Microsoft Data Analysis ToolPak was used as statistical software. Results. The results show that the factors of Level of Optimism, namely: Gender, Typology of Sports, and Competitive Level, do not affect the student-athletes Level of Optimism before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, the factors of Athletic Identity, namely: Gender, Year Level, and Socioeconomic Status, do not affect the student-athletes’ Athletic Identity before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, one factor that affects the student-athletes’ Athletic Identity during the COVID-19 pandemic is the Typology of Sports. To sum up, the Athletic Identity and Level of Optimism possess a weak correlation. Conclusions. . Based on the results of the study, it is concluded to regularly monitor the student-athletes’ Athletic Identity and Level of Optimism by taking the Athletic Identity Measurement Scale (AIMS) by Brewer & Cornelius (2001) and Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R)).
Full-text available
Hong Kong parents’ psychological control is evident as relatively high, which might have a negative impact on their children’s life orientation and attitude. Optimism plays a central role in young people’s development, psychological well-being, and health. This study aimed to examine 1) the relationship between parental psychological control and optimism; 2) the mediating role of self-mastery between these two concepts. A cross-sectional study was employed to collect/measure Hong Kong middle-school students’ socio-demographic information, parent psychological control (measured by The Chinese Paternal Psychological Control Scale), self-mastery (measured by The Mastery Scale), and optimism (measured by The Chinese version of the 6-item Revised-Life Orientation Test). Multivariate regression analysis and Baron and Kenny’s four-step approach were adopted for the relationships/mediation analyses. A total of 9244 middle school adolescents were included in the data analysis. The average age of the adolescents was 15.11 (SD, 1.79) years (ranges from 11 to 18). The regression analysis showed that both paternal psychological control (β = -0.036, p < 0.001) and maternal psychological control (β = -0.034, p < 0.001) had a significant direct association with optimism. Self-mastery fully mediates the relationship between paternal/maternal psychological control (β = -0.014 or -0.013, p < 0.05) and optimism. Findings support the significant relationships between parental psychological control and adolescents’ optimism levels and the significant mediation role of self-mastery. The findings indicate that psychosocial interventions designed to enhance young people’s self-mastery ability may buffer the negative impact from parental psychological control and improve optimism.
El bienestar subjetivo comprende experiencias emocionales positivas/negativas, prosperidad y satisfacción con la vida. Además, depende de múltiples factores psicosociales como: la rumia, el optimismo, la resiliencia y la capacidad para recibir apoyo, mismos que han sido estudiados en particular y necesitan ser examinados en conjunto. Por ello, este estudio se propuso: 1) identificar el efecto de las variables mencionadas en el bienestar subjetivo en adultos, y 2) explorar sus diferencias a partir del sexo, edad y escolaridad. Se contó con la participación voluntaria de 404 adultos mexicanos de entre 18 y 64 años (M=37.56), con escolaridad mínima de secundaria. Los resultados muestran el papel significativo de algunos factores del optimismo, resiliencia y rumia en la predicción del bienestar subjetivo, así como diferencias en auto-confianza (optimismo), experiencia emocional negativa (bienestar subjetivo) y capacidad de recibir apoyo entre sexos, y la tendencia a experimentar más optimismo, resiliencia y bienestar conforme se tiene más edad y escolaridad. Estos resultados muestran como los atributos positivos y la experiencia de vida se asociacian con otras experiencias positivas en pro del bienestar del individuo.
Optimism is shown to predict effective long-term rehabilitation, physical/mental health, and prevention of recidivism among prisoners. However, knowledge is scarce on factors that may specifically influence optimism within the population of inmates. In this regard, we cross-sectionally examined the predictive abilities of schizotypal personality traits (SPT) and family environments on personal optimism and sense of external security. Participants (204 male prisoners, mean age = 34.3 ± 8.73) were administered the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ-B), the Positivity Scale and Moos Family Environment Scale. Structural equation modeling was used to test assumptions. Controlling for time currently spent as an inmate and religious affiliation, results indicate that SPT significantly and negatively predicts dispositional optimism. However, the perception of family environments did not. The model largely accounted for a variance of 56% in personal optimism and 59% in external security. This suggests the necessity of early detection and management of SPT for increased optimistic dispositions in prison inmates.
Full-text available
El propósito de este estudio es aportar evidencias sobre la relación de la inteligencia emocional, satisfacción vital y optimismo disposicional en las personas con discapacidad intelectual que asisten a un centro de día y terapia ocupacional. La muestra está compuesta por 15 sujetos (n = 15), con una edad media de 34.93 años; dt (± 12.28) y un grado de discapacidad promedio del 64.07%. Para la obtención de información se utilizan como instrumentos: Trait Meta-Mood Scale-24 (tmm s-24), Emotional Quotient inventory (eqi-c), Satisfaction with Life Scale (swls) y Life Orientation Test Revised (lot-r). Las evidencias muestran que los participantes son capaces de mostrar una conducta adaptativa a circunstancias adversas y, por tanto, alcanzar un alto nivel de satisfacción vital y optimismo. Existen relaciones entre algunas de las dimensiones de los instrumentos considerados (p < .05) y hay diferencias significativas a nivel estadístico entre las dimensiones de inteligencia emocional y las variables sociodemográficas grado de discapacidad y edad (p < .05). El análisis de regresión confirma la asociación positiva entre inteligencia emocional (adaptabilidad) con la satisfacción vital. Se aborda una discusión de los resultados con investigaciones realizadas en colectivos con las mismas características, concluyendo la falta de estudios que aborden inteligencia emocional, satisfacción con la vida y optimismo disposicional en colectivos con discapacidad.
Full-text available
Resumen El objetivo de este estudio fue establecer las propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Estilo de Afrontamiento (Flórez-Alarcón, 1993), una adaptación de la Ways Coping Checklist revisada (Vitaliano et. al., 1985), que evalúa diferentes maneras de hacer frente al estrés. Para tal fin, participaron 200 adultos trabajadores de una empresa estatal de Bogotá-Colombia y sus familiares. Se analizaron las propiedades psicométricas relacionadas con la dificultad y discriminación de los ítems a través de la prueba t, la validez factorial mediante un análisis de componentes principales con rotación varimax y la confiabilidad a través del coeficiente de Cronbach e intercorrelaciones (ítem-escala, escala-escala), estableciendo la comparación con los datos de la prueba original (Vitaliano et. al., 1985). Los resultados indican que el Cuestionario de Estilo de Afrontamiento posee alta confiabilidad (α = 0.87) y homogeneidad en cada una de las cinco escalas que lo componen. El análisis factorial muestra que el cuestionario explica el 39% de la varianza total en el comportamiento de afrontamiento. Se concluye que el Cuestionario de Estilo de Afrontamiento es un importante acercamiento a la evaluación de estilos de afrontamiento. Palabras claves: Calidad de vida, rendimiento académico, educación, adaptación escolar. Abstract The goal of this study was to establish the psychometric properties of the Coping Style Questionnaire (Flórez-Alarcón, 1993), adapted from the Revised Ways Coping Checklist (Vitaliano et. al., 1985), which evaluates different ways of coping with stress. Two hundred employees from a public company, as well as their families, participated in the study. We analyzed the psychometric properties related to the difficulty and discrimination of the items using a t test and factorial validity using a principal components analysis with varimax rotation and reliability through Cronbach's coefficient and intercorrelations (item-scale, scale-scale), establishing a comparison with the original test (Vitaliano et al., 1985). The results indicate that the Coping Style Questionnaire has high reliability (α = 0.87) and homogeneity in each of its five scales. Factor analisys show the test explains 39% of the total variance in coping behavior. We conclude that the Coping Style Questionnaire is an important approach in the assessment of coping styles.
Full-text available
Introduction. The present study examines the predictive validity of perceived emotional intelligence and an optimism/pessimism disposition in solving social problems in social work students. Method. The TMMS, LOT-R and SPSI-R questionnaires were used in this study. The sample comprised 122 students from the second year of the Bachelor's degree program in Social Work at the University of Jaén (Spain). Results. Analysis of correlations showed significant relationships between the TMMS and LOT-R scales and the SPSI-R sub-scales. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that the IEP factor called emotional clarity predicts part of the variance of the SPSI-R sub-scales, those referring to Positive Problem Orientation, Rational Problem Solving and Avoidance Style. Elsewhere, the emotional attention factor explained part of the variance of the Negative Problem Orientation sub-scale. Likewise, the LOT-R predicts part of the variance of the SPSI-R sub-scales. Discussion and Conclusion. These results suggest that future social workers with high emotional clarity and optimistic attitude are better able to tackle and resolve social problems.
Full-text available
Se presenta un modelo de ecuaciones estructurales que predice en un 66% el comportamiento típicamente no violento a partir de la interacción de los factores consumo responsable de alcohol, el afrontamiento enfocado al problema, la búsqueda de soporte social, la autoculpa, la fantasía, el bienestar subjetivo, el apoyo social percibido, y el pesimismo; a su vez, el modelo puede predecir con una confiabilidad del 43% el consumo responsable de alcohol a partir de la interacción de los factores edad, percepción de acontecimientos estresantes, bienestar subjetivo, comportamiento típicamente no violento, sesgo optimista no realista, afrontamiento evitativo y pesimismo, con una muestra de 431 adolescentes escolarizados(X = 15,45 años, de= 1,39). Si bien el estudio no pretende ser concluyente, visibiliza la importancia de reconocer los factores psicosociales protectores en el diseño e implementación de programas de promoción y prevención asociadas al consumo responsable de alcohol y de conducta no violenta con adolescentes desde una perspectiva salutogénica. Los hallazgos y nuevos abordajes son discutidos. AbstractIs presented a structural equation model which predicted with an effectiveness 66% the typically not violent behavior through the interaction of the factors responsible drinking, problem-focused coping, seeking social support, self-blame, fantasy, subjective wellbeing, perceived social support, and pessimism; likewise, the model can predict with a likelihood of 43% the responsible alcohol consumption through the interaction between age, perceptions of stressful events, subjective wellbeing, typically not violent behavior, unrealistic optimism bias, avoidant coping and pessimism, with a sample of 431 adolescent students (X = 15.45 years, SD = 1.39). Although the study is not intended to be conclusive, makes visible the importance of recognize the protective psychosocial factors in the design and implementation of health promotion and prevention programs related to responsible drinking and non-violent behavior with adolescents within a salutogenic perspective. The findings and new approaches are discussed.
Full-text available
RESUMEN La presente investigación correlacional de corte transversal hecha en residentes de las ciudades de Bogotá, Barranquilla e Ibagué (Colombia) tuvo el objetivo de evaluar la existencia de una relación predictiva entre el riesgo de padecer trastornos de la conducta alimentaria, satisfacción con la imagen corporal, estilo de afrontamiento y el optimismo o pesimismo y la aceptación de cirugías plásticas cosméticas. Los resultados se analizaron mediante el uso de ecuaciones estructurales. Conclusión: la interacción entre la preocupación por la cantidad de calorías de los alimentos y por los alimentos mismos, el afrontamiento centrado en la búsqueda de apoyo social, la edad, la bulimia, el afrontamiento centrado en la evitación y el optimismo disposicional predicen la aceptación de cirugías plásticas cosméticas. ABSTRACT This cross-sectional correlational study in a population living in the cities of Bogotá, Barranquilla, and Ibague (Colombia), had the objective of assessing the existence of predictive relationship between the risk of eating disorders, body image satisfaction, coping strategies, optimism or pessimism , and acceptance of cosmetic plastic surgery. Results were analyzed using structural equations. Conclusion: concerns about the amount of calories in food, obsessive preoccupation with food, coping focused on the search for social support, age, bulimia, avoidance-focused coping, and dis-positional optimism, predict acceptance of cosmetic plastic surgery.
Full-text available
The infantile and juvenile aggressiveness is considered to be a complex phenomenon, with multiple factors that contribute to different aggressive manifestations. This phenomenon has been an object of many investigations, which have the aim to understand the basic mechanisms that cause and regulate this behaviour and it is important to consider that the interculturality is a reality that characterizes our school and our society. The increase of the immigrant population in Spain during the last years and the increase of international adoptions has generated in some schools a high percentage of pupils proceeding from other cultures. This study tries to analyze the presence of aggressive behaviour and the mechanisms of coping in a sample of 1557 adolescents 12 to 15 years old. Instruments used were the Inventory of Empathy for Children and Adolescents, the Prosocial Behaviour Scale, the Emotional Instability Scale, the Physical and Verbal Aggression Scale, and the Adolescents Coping Scale. The results show significant differences in physical and verbal aggressives behaviours and in the coping strategies evaluated depending on sex, the country of birth and the presence of students from other countries.
Este estudio tuvo como objetivo principal el diseño y validación de una escala que permitiera la evaluar la tendencia optimista/pesimista en adolescentes y jóvenes universitarios. La muestra estuvo conformada 617 estudiantes de educación superior, de ambos géneros, con una edad entre 18 y 31 años, provenientes de cuatro instituciones educativas ubicadas en dos ciudades colombianas. El análisis psicométrico mostró que la prueba cuenta con las condiciones de confiabilidad y validez necesarias para ser utilizada en poblaciones similares a la de validación. Las conclusiones muestran diferencias de género en los puntajes de optimismo y pesimismo, la presencia de sesgo optimista no realista en los adolescentes y la existencia de diferencias en la tendencia optimista según la procedencia. Se discuten las limitaciones del presente estudio.
A survey of 230 psychology students revealed that they underestimated the time they thought they would need to pay back student debt and overestimated their future incomes relative to the average student. The tendency to overestimate future income was positively correlated to their level of actual debt. Overall, the results suggest a bias towards optimism regarding their future careers.
The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between dispositional optimism and coping stretegies. Although dispositional optimism as assessed by the Life Orientation Test-Revised LOT-R) has often been associated with coping strategies, some researchers have found that its predictive power dissapears after controlling the effects of third variables, mainly, neuroticism and negative affectivity. This study used 415 subjects and investigated the ability of a revised measure of dispositional optimism to predict coping strategies. Participants also completed measures of neuroticism and negative affectivity. Analyses revealed that dispositional optimism was a significant predictor of coping stretegies even when the effects of neuroticism and negative affectivity were controlled. Overall, the Life Orientation Test-Revised does appear to possess adequate predictive validity.