ArticlePDF Available

First Occurrences of Lithasia armigera and Lithasia verrucosa (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae) in the Mississippi River

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

Lithasia armigera (Armored Rocksnail) historically occurred in the Cumberland, Ohio, and Tennessee river drainages of eastern North America, whereas Lithasia verrucosa (Verrucose Rocksnail) is known from the Ohio, Tennessee, and Black river drainages. Prior to our 24-27 September 2012 surveys; neither species had been recorded from the Mississippi River. We discovered Armored Rocksnail near the Mississippi River Missouri River confluence in the St. Louis metropolitan area, and both Armored Rocksnail and Verrucose Rocksnail 5 linear miles east-northeast of Osceola, AR.
Content may be subject to copyright.
N35
Southeastern Naturalist Notes
2013 Vol. 12, No. X
J.S. Tiemann, W.R. Posey, K.S. Cummings, K.J. Irwin, and B. Turner
First Occurrences of Lithasia armigera and Lithasia verrucosa
(Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae) in the Mississippi River
Jeremy S. Tiemann1,*, William R. Posey2, Kevin S. Cummings3, Kelly J. Irwin4,
and Bryan Turner5
Abstract - Lithasia armigera (Armored Rocksnail) historically occurred in the Cumberland, Ohio, and
Tennessee river drainages of eastern North America, whereas Lithasia verrucosa (Verrucose Rock-
snail) is known from the Ohio, Tennessee, and Black river drainages. Prior to our 24–27 September
2012 surveys, neither species had been recorded from the Mississippi River. We discovered Armored
Rocksnail near the Mississippi River–Missouri River conuence in the St. Louis metropolitan area,
and both Armored Rocksnail and Verrucose Rocksnail 5 linear miles east-northeast of Osceola, AR.
Freshwater snails are an understudied group, and basic information on species distribu-
tion is not well documented (Brown et al. 2008, Lynse et al. 2008). In addition, some aquatic
gastropods are microhabitat specialists with highly patchy distributions, and populations are
scattered among the mosaic of microhabitats created by ow regimes and sediment types
(Strong et al. 2008). We began investigating the status of gastropods in Illinois and Arkansas
by conducting literature reviews, examining museum collections, and qualitatively collect-
ing snails throughout both states. We conducted independent freshwater mollusk surveys
in the Mississippi River on 24–27 September 2012. The historically low water levels in the
middle and lower sections the Mississippi River (e.g., between its conuences with the Mis-
souri and Ohio rivers, and downstream of its conuence with the Ohio River, respectively)
allowed us to search for aquatic mollusks in many areas of the river that were previously
inaccessible. The results of our surveys yielded two rocksnail species (Gastropoda: Pleu-
roceridae) that had not been previously documented in the Mississippi River mainstem:
Lithasia armigera (Say) (Armored Rocksnail) and Lithasia verrucosa (Ranesque) (Ver-
rucose Rocksnail). We deposited specimens collected as part of the surveys in the Illinois
Natural History Survey (INHS) Mollusk Collection, Champaign, IL.
Armored Rocksnail is historically known from the Cumberland, Ohio, and Tennes-
see river drainages of eastern North America (Burch 1989, Goodrich 1940, Minton et al.
2005). Specically, the snail has been recorded from the Ohio River; lower Wabash River;
Cumberland River upstream of Burnside, Pulaski County, KY, to streams in Trigg County,
KY; and the Tennessee River in the vicinity of Florence, Lauderdale County, AL (Fig. 1).
Armored Rocksnail is typically found in sandy gravel areas, on cobble rip-rap, or on woody
debris (authors’ pers. observ.). Johnson et al. (2013) recently assessed the conservation
status of North American freshwater snails and ranked Armored Rocksnail as vulnerable
(a species that is imminently likely to become threatened throughout all or a signicant
portion of its range). We here report Armored Rocksnail at two locations in the Mississippi
River: 1) near its conuence with the Missouri River in the St. Louis metropolitan area, and
2) near Osceola, AR. The Illinois population was found on rip-rap throughout a ve-mile
stretch of the Mississippi River in Madison County, from river mile 195, across from its
conuence with the Missouri River at Lewis and Clark State Memorial Park, 1 linear mile
1Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois, 1816 South
Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820. 2Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, PO Box 6740, Perrytown,
AR 71801. 3Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois,
1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820. 4Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 915 Sevier
Street, Benton, AR 72015. 5St. Louis Community College, Florissant Valley, 3400 Pershall Road,
Ferguson, MO 63135. *Corresponding author - jtiemann@illinois.edu.
Notes of the Southeastern Naturalist, Issue 12/4, 2013
Southeastern Naturalist Notes
2013 Vol. 12, No. X
N36
J.S. Tiemann, W.R. Posey, K.S. Cummings, K.J. Irwin, and B. Turner
upstream of the Chain of Rocks Canal entrance (38.80529°N, 90.11574°W; INHS #43832),
to river mile 189.5, the rst wing-dam downstream of the Chain of Rocks dam (38.74756°N,
90.17827°W; INHS #43861) by J.S. Tiemann, K.S. Cummings, and B. Turner. Snail densiti-
ties were <5 individuals/m2, except for on the boulders in Chain of Rocks dam at river mile
190.3 (38.75596°N, 90.17205°W; INHS #43859), where density was about 100 individuals/
m2. We failed to nd Armored Rocksnail at 27 sites in the Mississippi River between river
mile 184.5, at the end of Gabaret Island, Madison County (38.68976°N, 90.19269°W) to
the river’s conuence with the Ohio River at Fort Deance State Park near Cairo, Alexan-
der County, (36.98308°N, 89.13912°W). We also failed to nd the snail upstream of river
mile 195 to Lock and Dam 26 (38.86582°N, 90.14231°W). The Arkansas population of
Armored Rocksnail was found in the Mississippi River at river mile 791, along Kate Aubrey
Towhead, 5.5 linear miles east-northeast of Osceola, Mississippi County, AR (35.74404°N,
89.87894°W; INHS #43433) by W.R. Posey and K.J. Irwin. Unlike the Illinois specimens,
the Arkansas specimens were all empty shells found on a gravel bar in concentrated,
wave-swept piles along the water’s edge. The nearest documented population of Armored
Rocksnail to the newly discovered Illinois and Arkansas sites occurs in the Ohio River at
river mile 974, Mound City, Pulaski County, IL (37.07804°N, 89.16529°W; INHS #32727;
Tieman et al. 2011), which is a distance of 197 river miles from the Illinois population near
St. Louis, and 169 river miles from the Arkansas population (noting that the Mississippi
River’s mile markers change at its conuence with the Ohio River).
Figure 1. Distribution map of Lithasia armigera. Two new locations on Mississippi River are indi-
cated with a star.
N37
Southeastern Naturalist Notes
2013 Vol. 12, No. X
J.S. Tiemann, W.R. Posey, K.S. Cummings, K.J. Irwin, and B. Turner
Verrucose Rocksnail is historically known from the Ohio, Tennessee, and Black river
drainages of North America (Burch 1989, Goodrich 1940, Minton and Lydeard 2003).
Specically, the snail has been recorded from the Ohio River; lower Wabash River; Ten-
nessee River from eastern Tennessee to Marshall County, KY; and Black and Spring rivers,
AK (Fig. 2). As with the Armored Rocksnail, the Verrucose Rocksnail is typically found in
sandy gravel areas, on cobble rip-rap, or on woody debris (authors’ pers. observ.). Johnson
et al. (2013) ranked Verrucose Rocksnail as currently stable (species populations not cur-
rently at risk). Empty shells of Verrucose Rocksnail were found with Armored Rocksnail
in concentrated, wave-swept piles along the water’s edge of a gravel bar in the Mississippi
River at river mile 791, along Kate Aubrey Towhead, 5.5 linear miles east-northeast of
Osceola, Mississippi County, AR (35.74404°N, 89.87894°W; INHS #43434) by W.R. Posey
and K.J. Irwin. Although the Black River population is closer in terms of linear distance
(approximately 70 miles), in terms of river miles, the nearest documented population of
Verrucose Rocksnail occurs in the Ohio River at Mound City (INHS #32728; Tiemann et
al. 2011), which is a distance of 169 river miles. Minton and Lydeard (2003) suggested that
Verrucose Rocksnails from the Black River drainage, in Arkansas, are genetically distinct
from the lower Ohio River populations.
Neither Armored Rocksnail nor Verrucose Rocksnail had been documented in the Mis-
sissippi River mainstem prior to our survey (e.g., Baker 1906, 1928; Burch 1989; Dawley
1947; Goodrich 1939; Stewart 2006; Wu et al. 1997). It is beyond the scope of our study
Figure 2. Distribution map of Lithasia verrucosa. New location on the Mississippi River is indicated
with star.
Southeastern Naturalist Notes
2013 Vol. 12, No. X
N38
J.S. Tiemann, W.R. Posey, K.S. Cummings, K.J. Irwin, and B. Turner
to determine if these populations are native or introduced. Given the distance to the next
known population, these Mississippi River populations could represent unique genetic
stocks. Future studies could utilize other methods (e.g., trawling or diving) to assess the
snail populations in the middle and lower Mississippi River, and examine genetics to deter-
mine the origin of the populations (e.g., Hayes et al. 2007).
Acknowledgments. Funds were provided in part by a grant from the Illinois Department
of Natural Resources’ Wildlife Preservation Fund (#13-031W) and the Illinois Department of
Transportation, Springeld, IL. B. Dabney, H. Dunn, S.M. Jaworski, B. Lubinski, J.E.
Petzing, and D. Shasteen assisted in collecting Illinois specimens, and J. Harris assisted in
collecting Arkansas specimens. J.L. Sherwood assisted in map creation. A.J. Baldinger, the
Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA; P. Callomon, the Academy of Natural
Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA; D.Ó. Foighil, the University of Michigan
Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI; J. Gerber, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago,
IL; T. Pearce, the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, PA; D. Roberts, Chicago
Academy of Science, Chicago, IL; J. Slapcinsky, the University of Florida Museum of Natu-
ral History, Gainesville, FL; and G.T. Watters, the Ohio State University Museum of Zoology,
Columbus, OH generously provided access to specimens under their care. P. Morrison and J.
Clayton provided Ohio River specimens. B. Tiemann offered constructive criticism.
Literature Cited
Baker, F.C. 1906. A catalogue of the Mollusca of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of
Natural History 7(6):53–136.
Baker, F.C. 1928. The fresh water Mollusca of Wisconsin. Part I: Gastropoda. Bulletin of the Wis-
consin Geological and Natural History Survey, University of Wisconsin 70(2):vi–495 + 76 plates.
Brown, K.M., B. Lang, and K.E. Perez. 2008. Conservation ecology of North American pleurocerid
and hydrobiid gastropods. Journal of North American Benthological Society 27(2):484–495.
Burch, J.B. 1989. North American Freshwater Snails. Malacological Publications, Hamburg, Michi-
gan. viii + 365 pp.
Dawley, C. 1947. Distribution of aquatic mollusks in Minnesota. American Midland Naturalist
38(3):671–697.
Goodrich, C. 1939. Pleuroceridae of the Mississippi River basin exclusive of the Ohio River system.
Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, Univeristy of Michigan 406:1–4.
Goodrich, C. 1940. The Pleuroceridae of the Ohio River drainage system. Occasional Papers of the
Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 417:1–21.
Hayes, D.M., R.L. Minton, and K.E. Perez. 2007. Elimia comalensis (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae)
from the Edwards Plateau, Texas: Multiple unrecognized endemics or native exotic? American
Midland Naturalist 158(1):97–112.
Johnson, P.D., A.E. Bogan, K.M. Brown, N.M. Burkhead, J.R. Cordeiro, J.T. Garner, P.D. Harteld,
D.A.W. Lepitzki, G.L. Mackie, E. Pip, T.A. Tarpley, J.S. Tiemann, N.V. Whelan, and E.E. Strong.
2013. Conservation status of freshwater gastropods of Canada and the United States. Fisheries
38(6):247–282.
Lysne, S.J., K.E. Perez, K.M. Brown, R.L. Minton, and J.D. Sides. 2008. A review of freshwater gas-
tropod conservation: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of the North American Benthological
Society 27(2):463–470.
Minton, R.L., and C. Lydeard. 2003. Phylogeny, taxonomy, genetics and global ranks of an imperilled,
freshwater snail genus Lithasia (Pleuroceridae). Molecular Ecology 12(1):75–87.
Minton, R.L., S.P. Savarese, Jr., and D.C. Campbell. 2005. A new species of Lithasia” (Mollusca:
Caenogastropoda: Pleuroceridae) from the Harpeth River, Tennessee, USA. Zootaxa 1054:31–42.
Stewart, T.W. 2006. The freshwater gastropods of Iowa (1821–1998): Species composition, geograph-
ic distributions, and conservation concerns. American Malacological Bulletin 21(1–2):59–75.
N39
Southeastern Naturalist Notes
2013 Vol. 12, No. X
J.S. Tiemann, W.R. Posey, K.S. Cummings, K.J. Irwin, and B. Turner
Strong, E.E., O. Gargominy, W.F. Ponder, and P. Bouchet. 2008. Global diversity of gastropods (Gas-
tropoda; Mollusca ) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595(1):149–166.
Tiemann, J.S., K.S. Cummings, and C.A. Mayer. 2011. Distribution of pleurocerids (Gastropoda)
of Illinois. INHS Technical Report 2011(9). Final report submitted to the Illinois Department of
Natural Resources, Springeld, IL. 36 pages + appendix.
Wu, S.K., R.D. Oesch, and M.E. Gordon. 1997. Missouri Aquatic Snails. Missouri Department of
Conservation, Natural History Series, Number 5, Jefferson City, MO. 97 pp.
Article
Full-text available
Lithasia armigera (Armored Rocksnail) is an imperiled pleurocerid (Gastropoda: Ceri-thioidea: Pleuroceridae) historically found throughout the Ohio River drainage. Its reproductive behaviors, like most aquatic gastropods, are poorly understood. We began propagating Armored Rocksnail in captivity, and herein report on the egg-laying behaviors of the species. These data can help natural resource and conservation managers prepare propagation and recovery plans to help conserve at-risk species.
Article
Full-text available
A general list of the continental freshwater mollusk species known in Santa Catarina’s State/ SC, the most central and small territory of the Southern Brazil region, with 72 limnic forms (70 freshwater – 40 gastropods and 30 bivalves – and two amphibious gastropods) is available, taxonomically included on 31 genera and 15 families (see pp. 31-35) ....... presented
Article
Full-text available
Continental malacological traversing during October and November 2013 was carried by the Brazilian “Project AM” through the gorgeous geography of the Italian Peninsula. A total of six regions and eleven provinces were visited in the course, the alpine "Lake Garda" between them. Specimens recognized totaled 17 species (16 Gastropoda - two limnic/ freshwater & one Bivalvia) ...
Article
Full-text available
A species of pleurocerid snail, Lithasia spicula sp. nov., is described from two groups of specimens taken from the Harpeth River, Tennessee near Bellevue. The species resembles Li. armigera (Say, 1821) conchologically, but molecular analyses group it either with the polyphyletic assemblage currently considered Leptoxis or as a separate lineage in Pleuroceridae. The species also possesses a unique radula, and is the first known pleurocerid endemic to the Harpeth River.
Article
Full-text available
A new species of " Lithasia " (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Pleuro-ceridae) from the Harpeth River, Tennessee, U.S.A. Abstract A species of pleurocerid snail, Lithasia spicula sp. nov., is described from two groups of specimens taken from the Harpeth River, Tennessee near Bellevue. The species resembles Li. armigera (Say, 1821) conchologically, but molecular analyses group it either with the polyphyletic assemblage currently considered Leptoxis or as a separate lineage in Pleuroceridae. The species also possesses a unique radula, and is the first known pleurocerid endemic to the Harpeth River.
Technical Report
Full-text available
Freshwater mollusks are among the most rapidly declining groups of organisms on Earth. Several species of aquatic gastropods, especially those in the family Pleuroceridae, are rare globally, but not much was known about their distribution and status in Illinois. We inspected museum collection holdings, conducted literature reviews on Illinois mollusks, and sampled throughout the state to obtain data on distribution and abundance of the pleurocerid fauna with an emphasis on declining species. Eleven species of pleurocerids are known from Illinois. We collected eight species live during our three-year study, including the first collection of Lithasia geniculata in the state. We failed to find three species, one of which (Leptoxis trilineata) is believed to be extinct. In addition to the currently listed Lithasia obovata, we feel Leptoxis praerosa and L. geniculata should be listed as endangered at the state because of their limited distribution and small population size.
Article
Full-text available
Many North American freshwater mollusks are at risk of extinction. Knowledge of basic ecology and systematics of the pleurocerid and hydrobiid gastropods is lacking. Pleurocerids are most diverse in southeastern USA, and we know that periphyton food limits their growth, and that their grazing, in turn, limits periphyton biomass. However, we know little about the effects of spates and current velocity on pleurocerid populations, and more work is needed to determine whether interspecific competition or significant risk from predation occurs. Hydrobiids are extremely diverse, but many species inhabit only a few springs (especially in arid western USA) and are at risk of extinction. More work is needed on their population and community ecology. Invasions pose a risk to native snail species. For example, the New Zealand mudsnail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) interacts negatively with several hydrobiids in the Snake River in western USA. We suggest several research avenues that are needed if we are to maintain and restore pleurocerid and hydrobiid snail populations.
Article
Full-text available
This is the first American Fisheries Society conservation assessment of freshwater gastropods (snails) from Canada and the United States by the Gastropod Subcommittee (Endangered Species Committee). This review covers 703 species representing 16 families and 93 genera, of which 67 species are considered extinct, or possibly extinct, 278 are endangered, 102 are threatened, 73 are vulnerable, 157 are currently stable, and 26 species have uncertain taxonomic status. Of the entire fauna, 74% of gastropods are imperiled (vulnerable, threatened, endangered) or extinct, which exceeds imperilment levels in fishes (39%) and crayfishes (48%) but is similar to that of mussels (72%). Comparison of modern to background extinction rates reveals that gastropods have the highest modern extinction rate yet observed, 9,539 times greater than background rates. Gastropods are highly susceptible to habitat loss and degradation, particularly narrow endemics restricted to a single spring or short stream reaches. Compilation of this review was hampered by a paucity of current distributional information and taxonomic uncertainties. Although research on several fronts including basic biology, physiology, conservation strategies, life history, and ecology are needed, systematics and curation of museum collections and databases coupled with comprehensive status surveys (geographic limits, threat identification) are priorities. RESUMEN esta es la primera evaluación sobre el estado que guarda la conservación de los gasterópodos (caracoles) de Canadá y los EE.UU., realizada por el Subcomité para los Gasterópodos (Comité de Especies Amenazadas) de la Sociedad Americana de Pesquerías. Esta revisión comprende 703 especies, pertenecientes a 16 familias y 93 géneros, de las cuales 67 se consideran extintas o probablemente extintas; 278 están en peligro, 102 amenazadas, 73 vulnerables, 157 cuentan con poblaciones estables y 26 especies presentan un estado taxonómico incierto. De la totalidad de la fauna, 74% de los gasterópodos se encuentran en alguna categoría de vulnerabilidad (amenazados, en peligro o vulnerables) o extintos, lo cual excede al nivel de amenaza al que está sujeto el grupo de los peces (39%) y los langostinos (48%), pero es similar al de los mejillones (72%). Comparando las tasas de extinción actuales contra las tasas de extinción de fondo en el grupo de los gasterópodos, se tiene que en la actualidad son las más altas registradas: 9,539 veces la tasa de extinción de fondo. Los gasterópodos son altamente susceptibles a la degradación y pérdida de hábitat, en particular aquellas especies endémicas cuya distribución está restringida a un solo manantial o a arroyos pequeños. La compilación realizada para esta revisión se dificultó por la falta de información sobre la incertidumbre en la distribución y taxonomía del grupo. Si bien se necesita desarrollar investigación en distintos frentes como biología básica, fisiología, estrategias de conservación, historias de vida y ecología, se consideran como prioridades la sistemática, curación de colecciones museográficas y bases de datos acopladas con muestreos sistemáticos integrales (para establecer límites geográficos, identificación de amenazas).
Article
Full-text available
This research explored the distribution, morphological variation, and molecular systematics of Elimia comalensis (Gastropoda: Pleuroceridae) using geometric morphometrics (n  =  565) and mitochondrial DNA sequences (n  =  15). Elimia comalensis was originally documented as endemic to Comal Springs, Comal County, Texas, but recent collections found this species in multiple springs and drainages in Central Texas. Morphometric analyses showed a high amount of morphological overlap with no clear geographic patterning. Phylogenetic analysis of mt COI sequence data indicated that E. comalensis represents a single species, with no genetic divergence among isolated populations. We conclude that E. comalensis may be an unrecognized native exotic, a species endemic to one area that has been spread by humans and assumed to be part of the natural fauna.
Article
Full-text available
North American freshwater gastropods remain an understudied, yet critically imperiled, fauna. As part of a larger discussion on freshwater mollusks in this special issue, we review 4 specific areas of concern regarding freshwater gastropods and discuss how best to address those concerns in the context of conservation. Areas of concern include freshwater gastropod conservation strategies, taxonomy and systematics, ecological research, and conservation challenges. We illustrate how each of these topics relates to conservation efforts and discuss opportunities to improve our baseline knowledge of freshwater gastropod taxonomy, ecology, and conservation. We emphasize throughout that effective conservation strategies require the participation of as many affected and interested groups, from local communities to governmental agencies, as possible for successful implementation and management. We offer suggestions for the direction of cooperative conservation with regard to freshwater gastropods.
Article
Full-text available
The world’s gastropod fauna from continental waters comprises ∼4,000 valid described species and a minimum of 33–38 independent lineages of Recent Neritimorpha, Caenogastropoda and Heterobranchia (including the Pulmonata). The caenogastropod component dominates in terms of species richness and diversity of morphology, physiology, life and reproductive modes and has produced several highly speciose endemic radiations. Ancient oligotrophic lakes (e.g., Baikal, Ohrid, Tanganyika) are key hotspots of gastropod diversity; also noteworthy are a number of lower river basins (e.g., Congo, Mekong, Mobile Bay). But unlike many other invertebrates, small streams, springs and groundwater systems have produced the most speciose associations of freshwater gastropods. Despite their ecological importance in many aquatic ecosystems, understanding of even their systematics is discouragingly incomplete. The world’s freshwater gastropod fauna faces unprecedented threats from habitat loss and degradation and introduced fishes and other pests. Unsustainable use of ground water, landscape modification and stock damage are destroying many streams and springs in rural/pastoral areas, and pose the most significant threats to the large diversity of narrow range endemics in springs and ground water. Despite comprising only ∼5% of the world’s gastropod fauna, freshwater gastropods account for ∼20% of recorded mollusc extinctions. However, the status of the great majority of taxa is unknown, a situation that is exacerbated by a lack of experts and critical baseline data relating to distribution, abundance, basic life history, physiology, morphology and diet. Thus, the already considerable magnitude of extinction and high levels of threat indicated by the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is certainly a significant underestimate.
Article
Although gastropods are important members of freshwater communities, the geographic range, ecological requirements, and conservation status of most species are poorly known. To advance this understanding, I used survey data from museums and peer-reviewed literature to summarize knowledge of the taxonomic composition and geographic distributions of freshwater gastropods in Iowa, U.S.A. Excluding records likely based on erroneous reports, 49 freshwater gastropod taxa (47 species and 2 genera with unknown numbers of species) inhabited Iowa during all or part of the period when records were collected (1821-1998). The Mississippi River and nearby tributaries of eastern Iowa and the prairie pothole and kettlehole regions of northern Iowa historically supported a large number of taxa. In contrast, few gastropods have been reported from the loess soils ecoregion of southwestern Iowa. Although recent improvements in water quality and increases in wetland habitat have likely benefited many gastropod taxa, it appears that as many as 18 species are now imperiled or extirpated from Iowa, and an additional 7 species were much less widespread at the end of the 20th century than formerly. These 25 species of conservation concern were identified on the basis of rarity or absence of recent records and on evidence of local extinctions that were associated with pollution and habitat loss. By comparing data summarized in this review with future data from field surveys, evidence of restricted or shrinking geographic ranges can be provided, and the true conservation status of lowan gastropods will be determined. This information is of critical importance in establishing legal protection and action plans for the recovery of endangered species.