ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Although there is a general agreement in the literature of the importance of social-emotional skills for labor market success, there is little consensus on the specific skills that should be acquired or how and when to teach them. The psychology, economics, policy research, and program implementation literatures all touch on these issues, but they are not sufficiently integrated to provide policy direction. The objective of this paper is to provide a coherent framework and related policies and programs that bridge the psychology, economics, and education literature, specifically that related to skills employers value, non-cognitive skills that predict positive labor market outcomes, and skills targeted by psycho-educational prevention and intervention programs. The paper uses as its base a list of social-emotional skills that employers value, classifies these into eight subgroups (summarized by PRACTICE), then uses the psychology literature -- drawing from the concepts of psycho-social and neuro-biological readiness and age-appropriate contexts -- to map the age and context in which each skill subset is developed. The paper uses examples of successful interventions to illustrate the pedagogical process. The paper concludes that the social-emotional skills employers value can be effectively taught when aligned with the optimal stage for each skill development, middle childhood is the optimal stage for development of PRACTICE skills, and a broad international evidence base on effective program interventions at the right stage can guide policy makers to incorporate social-emotional learning into their school curriculum.
Content may be subject to copyright.
P R W P 7123
Developing Social-Emotional Skills
for the Labor Market
e PRACTICE Model
Nancy Guerra
Kathryn Modecki
Wendy Cunningham
Social Protection and Labor Global Practice Group
November 2014
WPS7123
Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized
Produced by the Research Support Team
Abstract
e Policy Research Working Paper Series disseminates the ndings of work in progress to encourage the exchange of ideas about development
issues. An objective of the series is to get the ndings out quickly, even if the presentations are less than fully polished. e papers carry the
names of the authors and should be cited accordingly. e ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper are entirely those
of the authors. ey do not necessarily represent the views of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/World Bank and
its aliated organizations, or those of the Executive Directors of the World Bank or the governments they represent.
P R W P 7123
is paper is a product of the Social Protection and Labor Global Practice Group. It is part of a larger eort by the World
Bank to provide open access to its research and make a contribution to development policy discussions around the world.
Policy Research Working Papers are also posted on the Web at http://econ.worldbank.org. e authors may be contacted
at wcunningham@worldbank.org.
Although there is a general agreement in the literature of the
importance of social-emotional skills for labor market suc-
cess, there is little consensus on the specic skills that should
be acquired or how and when to teach them. e psychology,
economics, policy research, and program implementation
literatures all touch on these issues, but they are not su-
ciently integrated to provide policy direction. e objective
of this paper is to provide a coherent framework and related
policies and programs that bridge the psychology, econom-
ics, and education literature, specically that related to skills
employers value, non-cognitive skills that predict positive
labor market outcomes, and skills targeted by psycho-edu-
cational prevention and intervention programs. e paper
uses as its base a list of social-emotional skills that employers
value, classies these into eight subgroups (summarized by
PRACTICE), then uses the psychology literature—drawing
from the concepts of psycho-social and neuro-biological
readiness and age-appropriate contexts—to map the age
and context in which each skill subset is developed. e
paper uses examples of successful interventions to illus-
trate the pedagogical process. e paper concludes that the
social-emotional skills employers value can be eectively
taught when aligned with the optimal stage for each skill
development, middle childhood is the optimal stage for
development of PRACTICE skills, and a broad interna-
tional evidence base on eective program interventions
at the right stage can guide policy makers to incorporate
social-emotional learning into their school curriculum.
Developing Social-Emotional Skills for the Labor Market:
The PRACTICE Model
Nancy Guerra
University of Delaware
Kathryn Modecki
Murdoch University
Wendy Cunningham
The World Bank1
JEL: J24
Key Words: non-cognitive skills, socio-emotional skills, training, employment, human capital development,
psychology, education policy
1 Our thanks to Sophie Naudeau, Helen Abadzi, David Evans, Paula Villaseñor for their early reading of the paper
and valuable suggestions, to various Ministries in the governments of Colombia and Mexico for their feedback on
the model, and to World Bank’s ECA Skills Team and LAC Skills Team for their critical feedback and shaping of
the final concepts.
I. Introduction
Although there is general agreement in the literature on the importance of employability skills
beyond academic or vocational competence (Levy & Murnane, 2004; Yassin, Hasan, Amin, &
Amiruddin, 2008), there is little consensus on the specific skills that should be acquired for labor
market success or how to teach them. As Ter Weel (2008) notes, a diversity of definitions within
and across disciplines has created problems for both measurement of and investment in skill
development. Of the hundreds of skills, which are those with highest market returns and should
be included in child and youth skills development strategies? Of those skills that are a priority,
which are those that can be taught in public sector spheres? Few studies have summarized the
core set of skills that employers want, linked them to long-term school and employment
outcomes, and mapped the subset of social-emotional skills to effective policies, programs, and
interventions. This paper does all three.
Economic studies of employer demand for skills reveal a multitude of lists of desired skills.
Different studies have vastly different lists of skills, ranging from discrete life skills such as
“being on time” or “computer literacy” to broader constructs2 such as “teamwork.” A recent
review of international studies on employer demand for skills identified approximately 140 “soft
skills” defined across the sample (Cunningham and Villaseñor 2014).
Parallel with the literature on what employers want, economists and psychologists have been
exploring a broad range of personal and social attributes3 – often referred to as “non-cognitive
skills” in the economics literature4 – that play important roles in a range of social and economic
dimensions. Much work in this area has focused on personality traits based on easily available
empirically driven measurement systems, particularly the Big Five or five-factor model of
personality (Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Neuroticism, Openness to Experience, and
Extraversion), 5 or a single characteristic such as Grit6 (defined as long-term goals and
persistence). Most recent studies looking at these constructs and employment outcomes have
been correlational, and have demonstrated some relation between personality traits such as
Conscientiousness and Grit with outcomes such as earnings (Cunha & Heckman, 2008).
Beyond a focus on the Big Five and Grit, other studies have leveraged existing data sets that
include other skills-labeled as “non-cognitive” to examine their relation with economic success.
2 Constructs are psychological concepts or variables.
3 “Social attributes” are interpersonal qualities that facilitate or impede relationships with other people.
4 These skills are defined to some extent by what they are not rather than what they are. Indeed, the term has been
used to capture individual characteristics linked to social and economic success beyond cognitive skills such as IQ.
However, defining skills by what they are not has provided little guidance or conceptual integration for delineating
skills that are learned and that represent malleable targets for human capital investment.
5 A personality taxonomy that describes five key personality traits that are identifiable and distinguishable across
cultures. The Big Five model defines its personality factors: Conscientiousness encapsulates characteristics such as
dependability, industry, reliability, and self-discipline ; Agreeableness includes personality facets such as
cooperation, amiability, flexibility, and empathy; Neuroticism is defined by emotional instability, anxiety, and the
tendency to focus on the negative aspects of the self; Openness to Experience encompasses intellect, originality,
creativity, and insight; and Extraversion - Extroverted individuals are expressive, gregarious, energetic, and social.
6 Grit is a trait-like characteristic that contributes to the achievement of long-term goals. Individuals who are high on
Grit exert sustained effort and demonstrate long-term stamina and persistence, even in the face of failure.
2
These include classroom misbehavior (Segal, 2008), parent-reported behavior problems (Cunha
& Heckman, 2008), self-regulation (Rauber, 2007), and self-evaluations linked to self-esteem,
locus of control,7 generalized self-efficacy, and emotional stability (Holmand & Silva, 2009;
Judge & Hurst, 2007).
Much like the literature on skills employers want and studies of non-cognitive skills, the policy
research community also has its own lists of skills that are the target of interventions designed
for social-emotional skill building. Some approaches address a broad range of internal assets8
and contextual supports,9 such as the 40 assets for positive youth development10 listed by the
Search Institute (2013). Other models outline a smaller set of skills. For example, the
Consortium for Social and Emotional Learning (CASEL) has identified five core skills: self-
awareness; self-management; social awareness; relationship skills; and responsible decision-
making (CASEL, 2012). Lerner (2013) has identified a different set labeled the 5C’s:
competence, confidence, character, connection, and caring. These frameworks focus broadly on
positive skills for life or risk prevention but are not specifically geared towards skills predicting
labor market success.
In the program implementation realm, a range of psycho-educational skill-building interventions
to develop different sets of skills have been developed and implemented in schools and
communities. These interventions represent a variety of approaches including character
education, life skills training, anger management, social skills training, interpersonal problem
solving, and general skill building. Although the broad approaches differ in emphasis and scope,
most programs target some combination of social-emotional skills. Most of this work is focused
on children and youth.
Because the psychology, economics, policy research, and program implementation literatures are
not sufficiently integrated in terms of focus or outcomes, psycho-educational skill-building
interventions have not yet incorporated labor market success as a targeted outcome. We
recognize that there are many lists of skills linked to school and labor market outcomes, and that
suggesting yet another set of skills may be met with some concern. However, the field still lacks
a simple and cohesive organizing framework to delineate social-emotional skills that (a)
employers value; (b) predict school and labor market success; (c) follow a developmental course;
and (d) are malleable through structured, evidence-based interventions.
The objective of this paper is to provide a coherent social-emotional skills framework and related
policies and programs that bridge the psychology, economics, and education literature. It
7 Locus of control is the extent to which an individual believes that he/she has power or control over events and
outcomes in his/her life. An internal locus of control represents the belief that ability and influence lies within
oneself whereas an external locus of control represents the belief that outside forces determine success or failure.
8 Internal assets are internal resources or advantages that help to facilitate healthy development. For instance, high
IQ is an internal asset that increases the likelihood that a child will reach a healthy and productive adulthood.
9 Contextual supports are environmental assets that help to promote positive youth outcomes. For example, a
nurturing family environment and an academically rigorous school system are both supportive contextual domains
for child development.
10 Positive youth development is a broad emphasis on fostering youth assets, strengths, and abilities as opposed to
preventing risk or reducing harm.
3
develops and uses the PRACTICE framework to build on and expand three distinct literatures--
skills employers value, non-cognitive skills that predict positive labor market outcomes, and
skills targeted by psycho-educational prevention and intervention programs.11 The paper uses as
its base a list of social-emotional skills that employers value, classifies these into eight sub-
groups, then uses the psychology literature to map the age and context in which each skill sub-set
is developed, drawing in examples of successful interventions to illustrate the pedagogical
process. Our intent is to provide broad direction for labor-market oriented skill-building policies
and programs and to reframe these efforts in a language of skills that is consistent with
intervention programs.12
An additional contribution of this paper is to identify the optimal periods for development of the
PRACTICE skills. People cannot learn any skill at any age; instead they are learned
progressively in a bottom-up fashion once the fundamental developmental processes are in place.
In this paper, we define the developmental periods as neurobiological and psycho-social
readiness coupled with the contexts to facilitate learning.
The paper is organized into five sections, following this Introduction. In Section II, we provide
concepts and definitions that will be used throughout the paper, including a detailed introduction
to the concept of optimal stages. Section III describes the specific PRACTICE skills and how
they reflect skills employers value that also predict labor market outcomes. We also illustrate
how these skills are consistent with non-cognitive indicators commonly used among economists,
specifically the Big Five and Grit, and reflect a variety of sub-skills typically included in skill
building programs. We highlight related biological mechanisms to illustrate how these skills are
linked to and supported by innate human processes that contribute to readiness for skill
acquisition.
In Section IV, we discuss how acquisition of each PRACTICE skill set is aligned with
neurobiological and psychosocial readiness and relevant contextual supports across each of four
age-linked developmental stages: the early years, ages 0-5; middle childhood, ages 6-11;
adolescence, ages 12-18; and young or emerging adulthood, ages 19-29. We describe skill
development in each PRACTICE area across these developmental stages, emphasizing the
importance of cumulative investment in skill acquisition and highlighting the role of early
experiences.13 However, we also argue that, while programs and policies to enhance social-
emotional skills will be particularly effective during the early years and in developmental stages
when skills are being actively acquired and frequently utilized, continued efforts may be required
to sustain effects, and remediation14 and later learning also are possible.
11 We recognize that the importance of these skills will likely vary across different cultural and country contexts, and
that in some settings there may be culture-specific needs for other skills.
12 The PRACTICE framework represents an attempt to synthesize across these literatures and provide direction for
policies and programs. It is not intended as an exhaustive list but rather as a framework that covers a broad range of
the most critical social-emotional skills for personal and economic success.
13 From an economic and policy standpoint, it is well established that early development sets the stage for success
through ability and skill acquisition that renders later investments more productive (Cunha & Heckman, 2008).
14 Remediation is to correct or repair a skill deficiency. For instance, many programs for juvenile delinquents seek
to remediate their problematic decision making skills.
4
In Section V, we review evidence-based interventions for social-emotional skill enhancement to
build PRACTICE skills. We provide an illustrative table of model programs with greatest
evidence of effectiveness on key outcomes and related skills, including programs in middle
income and developing countries. We discuss best practices by age group, with
recommendations for intervention and future directions aligned with the promotion of the
PRACTICE skills from the early years into young adulthood. Section VI concludes.
II. Concepts and Definitions
Integrating Economic and Psychological Approaches by Focusing on Social-Emotional Skills
For the purposes of this paper, we define social-emotional skills as the broad range of malleable
skills that enable individuals to navigate interpersonal and social situations effectively. These
skills will underlie the PRACTICE framework. Those who have rallied around the Big Five and
personality assessments may wonder how a focus on core social-emotional skills is different. In
other words, given that the Big Five has been widely use in studies of labor market outcomes,
why is it necessary to identify other skills, and are they not already captured by the Big Five? We
highlight three advantages of a broader skills-based approach.
First, by definition, personality traits are relatively fixed characteristics. The Big Five describes
and empirically validates a set of independent factors that summarize the core dimensions or
broad traits of personality that differentiate individuals. So, a person who is measured by the Big
Five scale as being very introverted will have the same scores for introversion after an
intervention; by nature she possesses that trait. This is not to say that traits do not change;
research finds that they do change with age, but they are rank-order consistent (Roberts &
delVecchio, 2000). For instance, individuals become more conscientious as they get older and
the more conscientious children generally are the more conscientious adults.
Second, while traits are useful for prediction and classification of individuals into groups, skill
building programs requires the identification of modifiable skills15 that are aligned with more
enduring traits. Indeed, studies have shown that personality factors affect motivation and
performance largely through mediating factors that include skills such as problem solving and
self-efficacy (Roberts, Wood, & Smith, 2007). For example, a person may rank as very
introverted on a personality traits scale, but she may have learned tools to enact behaviors
associated with extraversion, so her behaviors may be extraverted but she is still an introvert at
heart. Thus, from an intervention perspective, it is more appropriate to target skills rather than
facets of personality.16
Third, interventions designed to enhance work-relevant skills require finer distinctions of
discrete sub-skills, rather than the broad range of skills captures in the Big Five constructs. For
instance, Neuroticism (lower levels of emotional stability) has been associated with facets such
15 Modifiable skills are changeable through intervention, in contrast to stable or set traits that are more permanent
and thus unlikely to be altered through programs or support services.
16 For example, schools do not engage in “personality change” interventions designed to promote specific traits, but
regularly implement programs to build social-emotional skills.
5
as anxiety, hostility, depression, impulsiveness, vulnerability, and self-consciousness and has
been linked primarily to negative mental and physical health outcomes (Lahey, 2009).
Notwithstanding some evidence that Neuroticism relates to labor market outcomes as part of a
broad dispositional trait termed core self-evaluations17 (including self-esteem, self-efficacy, and
locus of control) (Judge & Bono, 2001), this personality dimension does not align with
successful employment. Rather than seeking to move a person more toward the emotional
stability scale, programs can teach problem solving and relaxation tools, for example, to manage
anxiety or depression. Instead of embedding skill-building programs in models of personality,
we propose that skill acquisition investments should be guided by a framework that specifies key
skills that can be enhanced across the life course.
Optimal Stages
Skills are learned over time and across developmental stages. But any skill cannot be learned at
any age. Instead, the child needs to be “ready” in order to acquire a skill. The concept of
readiness implies that skill acquisition must be aligned with developmental capacity. This
creates optimal periods for acquisition and investment in specific skills. These optimal periods
are best understood as windows of opportunity of maximum sensitivity when it is easiest for
individuals to acquire specific skills.18 They begin and end gradually and can be amenable to
recovery. A common example is second language learning. This is considered optimal between
ages 3 and 6, but not impossible at any age, although the majority of older learners do not speak
with a native accent.
An optimal period is partly defined by neurobiological and psychological readiness.
Neurobiological readiness refers to a range of neurological and biological capacities, such as
brain structure or hormonal levels that are mature enough so that concepts can be understood,
learned, and acted on. For instance, a newborn cannot learn to speak or regulate emotions very
well because his/her neural connections are primarily those that govern physical functions such
as heart rate and breathing. Similarly, a 15-year old may still have problems with self-control
because the prefrontal cortex of the brain does not mature until early adulthood. Psychosocial
readiness is the notion that an individual has reached a level of sufficient emotional maturity and
social understanding to acquire a new set of skills. For instance, young children cannot solve
complex social problems19 until they develop the capacity for abstract thinking in adolescence.
A 5-year old cannot reason about complex ethical issues because he or she is not cognitively able
to consider multiple perspectives at once.
The optimal period is also defined by contextual supports, defined as age-appropriate settings
that provide opportunities to learn, practice and utilize skills. For example, a child cannot learn
social interaction skills if she is not in an environment in which she can engage with peers. Or,
in order to learn skills involved in teamwork, children must have opportunities to engage in
17 Core self-evaluations are a broad, higher-order personality trait that predicts job satisfaction and is based on a
composite of several individual personality traits including self-esteem, self-efficacy, neuroticism, and locus of
control (Judge & Bono, 2001).
18 although they may be learned later with greater effort
19 Interpersonal issues that arise during social interactions; for instance, being left out of a group, competing for a
leadership role, or navigating conflicting goals and values with those of one’s peers.
6
constructive social interaction with peers, which primarily occurs when they leave their parents’
sphere and go to school. The specific contexts where skill building is supported shift from early
childhood through young adulthood, although the specific age when this occurs may vary across
cultures and historical time periods.20
Skill Building by Optimal Stage
Investment in developmentally appropriate skill enhancement policies and programs therefore
requires understanding key features of neurobiological and psychosocial readiness and relevant
contextual supports for children of different ages. 21 Because there are marked shifts in
capacities and important developmental tasks22 that are roughly aligned with specific ages and
stages, it is useful to examine development within and across four major stages: The early years
(ages 0 to 5), middle childhood (ages 6 to 11), adolescence (ages 12 to 18), and emerging or
young adulthood (ages 19-29) (Guerra & Bradshaw, 2008).
The Early Years (ages 0-5)
Neurobiological development is an intense process in the early years. At birth, babies have over
100 billion brain cells but they have very few connections for utilizing these brain cells beyond
those needed for basic physical functions. They spend the first years of life actively absorbing
the physical and social environment, creating new connections more rapidly than at any other
time. Neural circuits are shaped through a breadth of experiences, and patterns of connectivity
are strengthened. The infant brain is being actively "wired" during this developmental stage,
creating foundations for later skill development.
Much of this brain wiring is established through interactions with the primary caregiver. Indeed,
research has shown that ongoing, reliable interaction with a trusted caregiver in a supportive
environment is essential for the development of healthy brain circuits, and this is particularly
critical during the ages 0-3. Children who have a secure attachment23 with a caregiver trust
others and are ready to learn about the social world, paving the way for skill development. On
the other hand, children who are insecurely attached to their caregiver have difficulty coping
with separation, which can lead to dysfunctional or problematic relationships and compromise a
child’s ability to learn social-emotional skills later on (Shonkoff & Levitt, 2010). This illustrates
a very early foundation for skill building that occurs in the context of infant-caregiver
20 Presently, in most settings the family is the primary social context during the early years, and skill-building
programs must involve families. In middle childhood, children enter primary school where they interact with peers.
During adolescence, some children leave school and enter the workforce while other children continue in secondary
schooling and higher education. In young adulthood, the social context is varied, where young people may be in
school, in the workforce, living in their parents’ home, or beginning their own families.
21 It also is impacted by how contexts are organized and the specific supports that are available to promote skill
building in each context.
22 Developmental tasks are broad classes of events or “lessons” appropriate to a child’s developmental stage such as
learning to walk or to follow the teacher’s directions at school. Children complete a developmental task by
interacting with the environment, engaging with a task, and acquiring a resulting skill-set.
23 Secure attachment is a healthy, trusting, and stable emotional relationship between a child and her/his primary
caregiver.
7
interactions, a foundation that can be bolstered by policies and programs to promote bonding and
support families.
In terms of psychosocial development, roughly before age 2, children have little notion of self or
the ability to distinguish themselves from others. Beginning around ages 2-3, children begin to
have simple representations or cognitive schema of themselves, others, and basic elements of
social interactions, but they are unable to see things from another's perspective until several years
later. Their brains are still in the process of forming connections, and their social connections
soon extend beyond the primary caregiver to the peer group. By socializing with peers, young
children begin to develop a sense of autonomy and initiative that allows them to understand how
to navigate the social world on their own and regulate their behavior to comply with group
norms, such as turn-taking and sharing.
The context in the early years is largely limited to parents, family, and small play groups.
Children in this age group are actively absorbing and trying to understand information, imitating
what they see others do, and adjusting their behavior in response to their environment. Different
behaviors will evoke different responses from others, and these different responses work to shape
the preschoolers’ emerging social-emotional skills and behavior. However, behavior still is
controlled largely by external contingencies rather than internal motivation. Skill building for
this age group requires providing contexts for social interaction where children can learn how to
get along with others on their own, and where they can observe, model, and be regularly
rewarded for developmentally appropriate skills that provide a foundation for future skill
building.
Middle Childhood (ages 6-11)
Across multiple disciplines, scholars and practitioners have identified middle childhood as a time
when personality, behavior patterns, and social-cognitive orientations become increasingly hard-
wired, setting an important stage for future skills and behavior. Indeed, the majority of effective
social-emotional interventions have been implemented during this stage (Durlak et al., 2011).
Beginning around ages 6-7, children’s brain systems become increasingly coherent and
interconnected through processes such as synaptic pruning24 (Kagan & Herschkowitz, 2005).
Connections used regularly become stronger, and those not used eventually are pruned away to
increase efficiency. These changes provide a neurobiological grounding for the development of
habitual social, emotional, and behavioral responses during this developmental stage.
Psychosocial, as well as cognitive capacities, undergo rapid developmental change in this stage.
Between ages 6 and 10, children are increasingly able to manipulate information, but they are
still unable to think in abstract terms thus requiring concrete examples. In addition, responses
that once required conscious control and slow thinking become automatic and patterned.
Improved cognitive abilities in middle childhood, particularly enhanced verbal and spatial
memory retrieval, also mirror children’s neurological maturation (Sowell et al., 2001).
Flexibility, goal setting, and information processing skills undergo critical progression between 7
24 The elimination of weak or unproductive connections between brain cells that facilitates connections among more
useful neural pathways.
8
and 9 years of age, and seem to stabilize by age 12 (Anderson, 2002). Social beliefs begin to
crystalize, and personality traits and related skills become more established and predictive of
future adaptation (Shiner, 2000). Although external rewards still are important, internal standards
for success are increasingly relevant.
Supportive contexts provide opportunities to regularly practice newly acquired skills. Successful
school and peer experiences lead to a sense of competence and set the stage for motivation to
succeed. For example, the primary school setting with structured academic activities presents a
context in which to develop an increasingly sophisticated self-understanding and sense of
industry,25 an important developmental task for this age. Peer contexts are increasingly important
as children begin to evaluate themselves in positive and negative ways and in comparison to their
peers, which increasingly shapes their self-related cognitions.26
Adolescence (ages 12-18)
Children experience another major growth in cognitive abilities such as abstract reasoning during
adolescence, particularly in second-order or meta-level executive control systems27 (Kuhn,
2006). Maturation in these systems leads to more effective decision making and learning.
Adolescents increasingly process decisions more quickly and also progressively constrain their
own responses and withstand competing inputs. These upgrades in higher order cognitive
functioning allow youth to direct their own learning and mental life, choosing how and where to
apportion their mental effort (Durston & Casey, 2006). Advances in abstract thinking allow them
to step outside of both themselves and others and take a "third-person" or societal perspective.
Despite cognitive advances in complex reasoning and abstract thinking, hormonal changes that
come with the onset of puberty and the not-yet-complete maturation of the prefrontal cortex can
lead adolescents to act impulsively, be overly sensitive to rewards, and struggle to make
decisions. On the one hand, the adolescent brain is quickly maturing, while on the other hand it is
still not fully ready to take on adult responsibilities. Indeed, the brain continues to change and
mature throughout adolescence and into young adulthood (Steinberg, 2008).
From a psychosocial perspective, adolescence is a time when young people actively try to figure
out who they are and where their lives are headed. A major developmental task is the
achievement of a coherent identity28 that allows adolescents to connect past, present, and future
experiences in a cohesive self-understanding (Erikson, 1950; 1993). Given this focus, it is easy
to see how teenagers become overly concerned with their self-image and the opinions of peers.
25 Having a sense of industry is to have the capability, productivity, and competence, often in relation to learning
new skills and acquiring knowledge.
26 Self-related cognitions are thoughts and views about the self, including self-concept about one’s abilities in
different domains (e.g. academic, social physical).
27 Executive control systems guide deliberate and intentional goal-directed behavior. As such, executive control
systems have been described as the “air traffic control system of the brain” (National Scientific Council on the
Developing Child, 2007).
28 Coherent identity is a sense of coherence, of personal sameness and continuity in different settings.
9
School and peer contexts take a different form in this age period than in the middle childhood
period. In fact, during this time, the importance of peers increases dramatically, and much
development (both positive and negative) occurs in the context of the peer group. Peer group
conformity is particularly intense between the ages of 12 to 14, but often continues throughout
adolescence. These supportive contexts should offer opportunities for self-exploration and
engagement with peers and communities.
Although there has been considerable discussion regarding the potential inefficiency of
investment in skill building during adolescence, the developmental literature suggests that it still
is a time of increased cognitive capacity, greater independence, and changing roles that support
strategic investment. There is a growing awareness of the need to develop targeted social-
emotional skill building interventions for this age group.
Emerging or Young Adulthood (ages 19-29)
The concept of emerging adulthood is relatively new. It has been proposed as a developmental
stage where the major task is to move into the adult world and build a stable life structure,
although this only occurs in cultures that allow young people a prolonged period of independent
exploration into their 20s (Arnett, 2000). In some sense, this period can be understood as an
extended hiatus between adolescence and adulthood where young people take time to explore job
and career options, relationships, and values that can guide the rest of their lives.
Neurobiological development continues into young adulthood until the brain reaches full
maturity until in, at least, the mid 20s. The specific changes are not well studied, although it is
clear that the executive functions mature. These functions impact high-level skills such as
calibration of risk and reward, prioritizing, thinking ahead, self-evaluation, long-term planning,
and regulation of emotion.
In contrast to primary contexts associated with earlier stages, emerging adulthood is
characterized by a heterogeneity of contexts, including a continuation of schooling, entrance into
the world of work, moving out of the home and family environment, and creating independent
lives and new families. These multiple contexts afford opportunities for altering a
developmental course but they also make it more difficult to provide structured supports across
these different contexts.
III. The PRACTICE Skills
The PRACTICE taxonomy captures the key skills that employers want, is consistent with what
has been studied in the non-cognitive skills literature, and provides direction for interventions to
enhance educational and employment success. The PRACTICE taxonomy was developed by: (a)
sorting employer demanded skills identified in a review of international studies into primary
categories or skills and aligning these with other related studies; (b) reviewing the literature on
non-cognitive skills to determine overlap of common indicators such as Big Five and the Grit
scale; and (c) reviewing the psychological and educational literature to identify social-emotional
skills commonly targeted by interventions that are most relevant for improving labor market
outcomes.
10
We identify eight major skill areas relevant for the labor market, each with sub-skills, related
personality correlates, and links to neuro-biological systems (summarized in Table 1).
Table 1. PRACTICE Skills, Sub-Skills, Big Five Traits, and Biological Foundations
PRACTICE:
Skills for
Success
Sub-Skills (Skills,
Attitudes, Beliefs,
Behaviors)
identified by
employers
Related Big Five
Personality Traits
Neuro-Biological Foundations
Problem-
Solving
Social-information
processing skills
Decision making
Planning skills
Conscientiousness
Executive attention systems
ability to focus attention and to
inhibit negative emotionality
Resilience
Stress resistance
Perseverance
Optimism
Adaptability
Conscientiousness
(Grit)
Neuroticism
Biological system focused on
preventing harm
Achievement
Motivation
Mastery orientation
Sense of purpose
Motivation to learn
Conscientiousness
(Grit)
Openness to
Experience
Biological tendency to seek out
new environments
Orienting sensitivity—tendency
to respond to sensory stimulation
Control
Delay of gratification
Impulse control
Attentional focus
Self-management
Conscientiousness
Executive attention systems
ability to focus attention and to
inhibit negative emotionality
Self-Regulatory Systemdelay
of gratification
Teamwork
Empathy/Prosocial
Low aggression
Communication
skills
Relationship skills
Extraversion
Agreeableness
Biological system promoting
active approach and exploration
tendency to enjoy social
interaction and positive moods
Initiative
Agency
Internal locus of
control
Leadership
Conscientiousness
Openness to
Experience
Biological tendency to seek out
new environments
Orienting sensitivity—tendency
to respond to sensory stimulation
Confidence
Self-efficacy
Self esteem
Positive identity
Neuroticism
Biological system that is focused
on preventing harm
Ethics
Honesty
Fairness orientation
Moral reasoning
Conscientiousness
Biological system promoting
active approach and exploration
tendency to enjoy social
interaction and positive moods
11
Problem Solving includes a range of discrete skills related to how individuals solve social
problems. These skills are associated with specific facets of Conscientiousness. Much of the
developmental and intervention work on social problem solving29 has emphasized an array of
interconnected social information-processing skills30 individuals use when solving social
problems (e.g., joining a group, resolving conflicts). These include attention to relevant cues,
interpretation of cues and emotional reactions, goal setting and planning, access to behavioral
responses from memory, evaluation of responses, decision making, behavioral enactment, and
reflection (Crick & Dodge, 1994). Through socialization, direct instruction, and cultural
influences, individuals develop relatively stable patterns of processing social (and non-social)
information.
Resilience has been defined as the ability to “bounce back” from adversity and thrive in the
context of risk. Resilience refers to a pattern over time that is characterized by good eventual
adaptation despite risk, stressors, or adversity. It also is defined by the ability to appropriately
and realistically connect future goals and opportunities to one’s own abilities, and to adapt as
needed to situational constraints. Resilient individuals cope well with stressors and do not get
derailed by stressful events but persist and remain optimistic. Although there are individual
differences in stress tolerance, resilience generally is a learned process that is facilitated through
positive and supportive interactions with the environment. Conscientiousness and low
Neuroticism are two of the Big Five traits that align with resilience, along with Grit, but it is the
expression of these traits under difficult circumstances that is the defining feature of resilience.
Achievement Motivation includes an orientation towards success, mastery, and sense of
purpose. It has been associated with the capacity and drive to pursue difficult tasks, to work
toward desired goals, and a high degree of independence. Individuals who are high in
achievement motivation will demonstrate both a desire to learn and a focus on mastery as well as
(or even more than) performance goals. They view learning skills and intelligence as an effortful,
incremental process that can be improved rather than an inherited trait that is relatively stable
over time. In terms of personality traits, it is most closely aligned with Conscientiousness and
Openness to Experience as well as the construct of Grit.
Control (self-control) includes a range of self-regulatory skills that are evident when individuals
are able to modulate and restrain their impulses or immediate reactions to stimuli. Control skills
such as the ability to effectively focus attention, delay gratification, and inhibit impulsive
responding are crucial for early academic achievement and have been linked to later adjustment,
educational, and occupational success. They also are important for problem solving, as they
allow individuals to “stop and think” before acting and respond in a controlled rather than
automatic fashion. Control is related to the concept of delay discounting in that low levels of
impulse control are linked to higher levels of discounting future rewards. Self-control is an
29 “Social problem solving” is defined as an individual's ability to acquire, maintain, and apply social information
about people and inter-personal situations.
30 “Social information-processing skills”are“On-line” cognitive abilities that are used during social interactions, such
as encoding information from the environment, interpreting social intimations, creating a set of plausible behavioral
responses, and selecting and enacting an appropriate reaction.
12
important skill complement to Conscientiousness.
Teamwork refers broadly to a set of skills involved in getting along with others, understanding
their feelings and points of view, communicating effectively, being helpful and agreeable, and
not engaging in aggressive or bullying behaviors. In the social-emotional domain it has been
defined more regularly as “relationship skills” that enable individuals to get along with and work
effectively with others, including people from diverse cultures. Teamwork is highest among
individuals who score high on personality traits of Extraversion and Agreeableness.
Initiative can be conceptualized as the “active ingredient” that motivates individuals to operate
as positive and successful actors in their own lives and in systems. Initiative hinges on personal
agency31 and an internal locus of control, a belief that outcomes depend on one’s own actions
rather than fate, chance, or others. It is linked to enterprise, taking charge, follow-through,
determination, and leadership. It also facilitates effective engagement within organizational
contexts. Although initiative and achievement motivation are related, they are distinct skills.
Initiative relates to any type of “take charge” action such as picking up litter on the street,
whereas achievement motivation is linked to a desire to succeed and is associated with setting
long-term academic and career goals and following this pursuit in spite of obstacles that may
occur along the way. Initiative correlates with mastery orientation to achievement and relates to
the personality traits of Openness to Experience and Conscientiousness.
Confidence includes beliefs and feelings about one’s abilities generally and in specific contexts.
These beliefs have been referred to as self-efficacy or efficacy beliefs. Confidence also includes
a realistic self-concept and positive feelings towards the self, often labeled self-esteem or self-
confidence. In adolescence, it is an important component of identity development based on a
positive sense of self and one’s direction and future in the world. Self-relevant constructs have
been linked to low levels of Neuroticism.
Ethics are skills that are characterized by strength of character, social responsibility, and
principled behavior. There is considerable debate as to whether there are universal ethical values
or whether ethics are relativistic or dependent on cultural norms. Still, in terms of labor market
outcomes, it is possible to identify specific and more universally-accepted and relevant skills
linked to honesty, following rules, following through on actions, fairness, and acting in a
responsible manner. Clearly, society and employers require trustworthy citizens who follow
cultural rules and norms. For example, GED-earning adults contribute less to the economy than
high-school graduates, a pattern that is not attributable to differences in academic competence.
Instead, GED earners may be less proficient in adhering to ethical, context-suitable behavior,
because they missed opportunities to acquire these skills from school social interactions
(Heckman & Rubinstein, 2001). Skills related to ethics such as following rules are associated
with the personality trait of Conscientiousness.
31 Personal agency is the understanding that outcomes and consequences are a result of one’s own volition. It is the
sense that an individual has the power and ability to control his or her own outcomes.
13
IV. Putting It All Together: How PRACTICE Skills Are Learned Across the Early
Lifecycle
As we have noted throughout this paper, skill acquisition is a continuous process that requires
neurobiological and psychosocial readiness coupled with ongoing contextual supports. For each
of the PRACTICE skills it is possible to identify the stages that are particularly appropriate
(optimal) for skill building. Table 2 summarizes these stages for each PRACTICE skill.
Table 2: Stages of Development for PRACTICE skills
Skills for the
labor market
Early childhood
Middle
childhood
Adolescence
Emerging
adulthood
Problem solving
Foundational
Optimal
Optimal
Reinforce
Resilience
Optimal
Optimal
Reinforce
Achievement
motivation
Optimal
Reinforce
Control
Optimal
Optimal
Optimal
Reinforce
Teamwork
Optimal
Optimal
Reinforce
Initiative
Optimal
Optimal
Optimal
Optimal
Confidence
Foundational
Optimal
Optimal
Reinforce
Ethics
Foundational
Optimal
Optimal
Note: “foundational” indicates that skills developed in this period form the basis for the core skill building in a
following period. “Reinforce” indicates that a skills acquired during the optimal period needs intense practice in the
reinforcement period for the skills to be truly learned.
Problem solving. Problem solving is characterized by the ability to autonomously make
decisions, to plan, and to process information, with social problem solving referring to an
individual's ability to solve interpersonal problems involving conflicts with others. The
foundational skills for problem solving are set during the early years but middle childhood and
adolescence are the optimal stages for problem solving development.
Although young children have a very basic capacity to solve social problems, their context is
such that they typically rely on adult caregivers to help them navigate this task. Still, by about
ages 4-5, they are able to understand basic concepts for how to get along with others including
turn taking and sharing, and they can learn these skills through modeling, reinforcement, and
practice. Programs for preschoolers such as I Can Problem Solve (Shure & Spivack, 1982) have
shown that children in this age group can improve problem-solving skills such as generating
alternative solutions to social problems through focused training.
14
The middle childhood context – entering formal schooling – and cognitive shifts make this stage
particularly conducive to the development of social problem solving skills. As children enter
formal schooling around ages 5-6, they are faced with a plethora of new demands they must
resolve on their own or with limited adult and peer assistance. These demands are accompanied
by cognitive shifts that provide for greater efficiency that contribute to more habitual styles of
solving problems. During middle childhood, children practice problem-solving skills as they
moderate the intensity and difficulties associated with educational transitions (Elias et al., 1986)
and buffer the effects of stress on academic achievement and behavior (Dubow & Tisak, 1989).
In fact, strong social problem solving in middle childhood has ripple effects on later
development and shepherds a proficient shift into the workforce in early adulthood (Hustson &
Ripke, 2006).
The neural systems governing major cognitive skills have reached a maturation level to allow for
optimal development of social problem solving skills during middle childhood. Executive
attention32 continues to mature, so that children can increasingly focus attention and inhibit
negative emotionality. Consistent with this neurobiological progression, teaching children to
correctly interpret social cues, to balance the pros and cons of social decisions, and to hold a
repertoire of pro social response-sets during this period helps them to avoid later aggression
problems (Guerra, Boxer, & Kim, 2005), that, in turn, predicts higher job earnings in adulthood
(Duckworth et al., 2012).
The interplay between biology and context set a developmental mandate for improved problem-
solving skills during adolescence. In most cultures, adolescence affords growing opportunities
for autonomy that increase the utility and importance of problem-solving skills and thus the
opportunity to practice and therefore internalize these skills. Problem solving can be enhanced
through programming designed to move teenagers towards more controlled decision-making
within appealing contexts. Adolescents also can be encouraged to set their own decision rules to
guide their problem solving. For instance, teenagers can be taught to differentiate contexts and
decisions that require thoughtful and reflective decision making, versus situations that require
more automatic responses.
Resilience. Resilient individuals adapt and even thrive in the face of stress and difficulty.
Because at its core, resilience depends on an individuals’ response to adverse events, biological
systems that regulate the body’s stress response play an important role in its development.
Because stress is quite toxic during the early years, it is particularly important to build resilience
skills beginning in infancy through middle childhood, although they should be strengthened and
reinforced later in time.
A combination of psychosocial predisposition and contextual supports in the early years forms
the basis of resilience. In particular, children with engaging, easy temperaments that generate or
attract emotional support from parents and others during the early years and continuing through
32 Executive attention is generally focused on short-term or working memory and allows for processing of relevant
material. Executive attention is also attentional control that blocks potentially distracting information from gaining
focus.
15
childhood and adolescence fare better. Affable temperament serves primarily to “enlist” positive
adult influence, a skill that can be augmented by interventions and programs that provide
emotional and educational supports to young children and families at risk. Even children who
display some level of biological vulnerability can benefit from programs that help parents
provide emotional support for their children; these programs are most effective when provided
during the early years (ages 0-5).
This extends to the effects of supportive neighborhood and community settings. Several related
studies have demonstrated how environmental contexts can buffer the effects of individual risk
for the 0-5 age group. For example, in one study of low-income and high-income 4-year olds,
Gutman, Sameroff, and Cole (2003) found that the high risk group (low IQ, etc.) living in low
risk community conditions performed consistently better on a range of outcome measures than
the low risk group living in high risk conditions. Similarly, using data from the National
Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLYS), Heckman, Stixrud, and Urzua (2006) found that the
impact of early gaps in ability on various outcomes diminished greatly when family background
was controlled for.
Middle childhood brings with it new challenges aligned with improved cognitive and
psychosocial maturation, observed through an increasing sense of industry and greater self-
awareness, that allow children to reflect on their circumstances and develop proactive strategies
and coping skills to respond to failures and challenges. At this stage, providing children with
opportunities to adaptively respond to challenges can cultivate resilience. Even children growing
up in well-to-do contexts can face difficulties with peers and in school and must learn and
practice overcoming these challenges. These coping skills can be taught directly through
structured interventions, and often are part of comprehensive skill building programs. These
skills can also be facilitated by settings that provide “second chances” and new opportunities for
youth to efficiently use the skills they have. In particular, skills can also be buttressed by
coaching children to accurately assess and work to improve their own abilities and strengths
(Werner, 1993).
Achievement motivation. Middle childhood is an optimal period for the development of
achievement motivation, and primary schools have a particularly important role. Ages 6-11 is a
time when connections that are used become stronger and habitual behaviors, attitudes, and
beliefs crystallize. Primary school is a major developmental context for this age group with
learning goals and performance assessments.
Children who do not perform well during primary school may develop beliefs and strategies that
derail and frustrate them, interfering with subsequent performance, particularly in cultures that
place a high value on achievement. By teaching children that intelligence is a malleable quality
that can be cumulatively increased through learning, children’s achievement motivation can be
increased, leading to a mastery orientation (Dweck, 1986). Children who have a mastery
orientation seek out challenges and try for excellence even amid the possibility of failure,
deriving gratification from learning new skills and mastering new tasks. In contrast, children
who have maladaptive responses to challenge avoid difficult tasks and circumvent contexts that
hold the possibility for failure, diminishing their functioning and curtailing their growth--their
primary motivation is to avoid failure.
16
A number of interventions in middle-childhood have been successful in developing achievement
motivation by changing children's beliefs about intelligence, learning goals, and strategies for
coping with academic challenges during the primary school years (Blackwell, Trzesniewski, &
Dweck, 2007). This is particularly compelling as a target for intervention because it can level the
academic playing field for those who are less versus more cognitively gifted (Dweck & Leggett,
1988). Although remedial supports may be implemented in adolescence and early adulthood,
schools are the primary context for supporting achievement motivation, and primary schools are
critical.
Control. Efforts to enhance self-control must begin from infancy and continue through
adolescence, with reinforcement in early adulthood, when the prefrontal cortex (that provides the
neurological engine for control) becomes fully mature. Self-control is important because it
allows individuals to regulate behavior, delay gratification, and refrain from impulsive
responding.
Although infants have difficulty regulating affect and behavior, beginning around age 2,
executive attention systems that regulate control undergo significant changes, setting the stage
for early control systems to develop (Posner & Rothbart, 2000). As children enter preschool and
formal schooling, self-control helps them pay attention in class, wait their turn, listen to
directions, complete tasks as assigned, and interact effectively with others. In contrast, children
with poor executive function have difficulty focusing their attention and inhibiting negative
emotionality. In the early years, this sets the stage for academic difficulties and coercive
interactions with peers, teachers, and parents. Poor executive function can create a negative
developmental cascade in which children with poor self-regulation skills decrease their
opportunities for academic learning and socialization, setting in motion further educational and
relationship difficulties.
A number of psychological and educational studies demonstrate that self-control can be
effectively encouraged during early childhood (Blair & Diamond, 2008). Parents can model and
scaffold self-regulation by using language to assist children in controlling their impulses and to
help children problem solve. Parents also can model and reinforce emotion and behavioral
control strategies and positive attitudes towards self-regulation. Several cost-effective pre-school
interventions (discussed in Section V) provide strong examples of how early self-control
interventions can spark a positive developmental chain reaction—improved self-regulation leads
to improved school readiness which leads to better academic and psychosocial outcomes33
(Cunha & Heckman, 2008).
During middle childhood, neurobiological and psychosocial development leads to increases in
cognitive flexibility34 and social connectedness (Anderson, 2002). In parallel, children’s
improved language skills help them to mediate their control responses and respond non-
33 Psychosocial outcomes reflect the interplay between personal or individual level outcomes (e.g. physical health)
and social or contextual outcomes (e.g. peer pressure, parental support). Psychosocial outcomes are a broad umbrella
term for outcomes that reflect an individual’s level of functioning in the context of their environment
34 Cognitive flexibility is the ability to creatively connect ideas, to adapt cognitive processing strategies to
unforeseen conditions, and infer information from new circumstances (Deák, 2003).
17
physically to provocation (Greenberg, Kusche, & Speltz, 1991). As a result of these
developmental changes, middle childhood tends to be a period of enhanced self-control.
However, adaption problems linked with poor control are also magnified during this
developmental stage, as children have increasing influence over their own environments. Such
inhibitory control difficulties are likely to beget further concerns, including low academic
achievement and rule-breaking behavior. Poor affect regulation35 and inability to tolerate
frustration during middle childhood can lead to poor skill formation and related problems in
adolescence and beyond (Olson, Schilling, & Bates, 1999). Further, control skills during middle
childhood set the stage for the manifestation and expression of distinctive and more permanent
stable patterns of social interaction in adolescence and adulthood (Shiner, 1998).
During adolescence, progressive neural development ultimately leads to better and more mature
decision making. However, self-control is a work in progress. Cognitive control systems show a
developmental lag and undergo a different maturational pattern relative to affective systems36
(Steinberg, 2008). Namely, control systems seem to be less fine-tuned and connections among
control systems less networked, so that this mechanism for regulating dangerous and problematic
behavior does not come “on-line” as rapidly or as regularly as the adolescent’s affective reward
system (Crone & Dahl, 2012).
Consistent with “affective overdrive” in their neural systems, adolescents display heightened
social and emotional reward salience relative to both children and adults, and place a marked
emphasis on excitement and peer approval. All of this translates to a developmental period
marked by a surge in health threatening and reckless behavior linked to difficulties in self-control
that can dampen adolescent’s social and economic contributions over the long-term. For
example, adolescents engage in high rates of substance use that can lead to lower educational
attainment and higher substance dependence (Odgers et al., 2008).
Teamwork. Although teamwork frequently appears as a skill that employers value highly, it is
not commonly considered within the social-emotional skills literature as a discrete skill.
Translating this to social-emotional learning, teamwork represents a cluster of attributes such as
empathy, communication, and relationship skills that facilitate positive social interactions. These
social skills are a product of both temperament and context; environmental supports can buffer
the effects of negative temperamental attributes as well as contribute independently to skill
development. By about age 12, children develop relatively stable patterns of social behavior
related to teamwork. Consequently the early years, from infancy through middle childhood, are
particularly critical for building skills that provide the foundations of teamwork and
collaboration.
Early temperament plays a defining role in how infants and very young children interact in social
settings. Clearly identifiable and enduring patterns of social interaction such as shyness have
35 “Affect regulation” is the ability to modulate or manage negative mood or emotion in a positive and productive
manner. Poor affect regulation is reflected in anger management problems, interpersonal issues, and risk behavior.
36 Emotional systems that emphasize social-emotional rewards, such as excitement and peer approval. Affective
systems appear to drive adolescents’ relatively heavy involvement in risk behavior.
18
been observed in very young infants. For example, several studies have demonstrated a link
between temperamental characteristics such as behavioral inhibition (easily distressed in
response to novel stimuli) and high social reticence with unfamiliar peers or adults in childhood
(Fox et al., 2001). Other studies have focused on dispositional qualities such as willingness to
explore in unfamiliar situations, and the tendency to enjoy social interaction (Campos, Campos,
& Barrett, 1989) that contribute to the development of teamwork and related social skills.
Given that biology and context interact to perpetuate trajectories that lead to strong or weak
teamwork skills, early interventions with infants and young children may help to facilitate the
development of positive characteristics such as adaptability and positive affect. Policies and
programs also can provide targeted, supportive contexts for very young children with known
temperamental risk factors before they translate into more stable skill deficits over time.
Many of the early positive developmental precursors to teamwork are teachable skills during
early childhood. For example, purposefully eliciting verbal discourse and expanding language
competencies by scaffolding vocabulary37 and grammar can teach communication skills.
Children can further attain interpersonal skills though interaction and modeling and learn through
feedback to increase integration strategies. High quality preschool also is a useful intervention
for augmenting social skills and increases children’s proficiency in forming and keeping peer
relationships (Hazen & Black, 1989). Investment in programs that provide supportive
environments for very young children and their families may help to counteract biological risk
and facilitate the development of positive teamwork and related social-emotional skills
(Knudsen, Heckman, Cameron, & Shonkoff, 2006).
As children grow older, their increasing cognitive maturation allows them to take the
perspectives of others and understand emotional cues. Thus, particularly beginning in middle
childhood, they are increasingly likely to engage in prosocial behaviors towards others, including
getting along and working cooperatively with others, empathy and helping behaviors, concern
about acceptance by others, and management of aggressive and antisocial behaviors according to
normative standards. Cross-cultural studies also have shown that children who engage in more
household, school, and community tasks display higher levels of altruism and empathy (Whiting
& Edwards, 1988), although the directionality of effects is unclear. Similarly, children who are
rated as socially engaged and competent by peers have better academic and mental health
outcomes years later (Morrison & Masten, 1991; Parker et al., 2004).
Developmental shifts in aggression also occur during middle childhood, with verbal and more
indirect forms of aggression (including bullying) rising when children enter school and interact
regularly with peers. Although aggression generally declines over time, it tends to stabilize in
relative rank during middle childhood. A number of studies have shown that childhood
aggression around age 8 is a robust predictor of adult criminality and related problems,
particularly for boys (Bushman & Huesmann, 2002). There are a number of curriculum-based
competence promotion and aggression prevention programs (reviewed in Section V), as well as
school climate and school organizational interventions with evidence of impact on social
37 To scaffold vocabulary is to give appropriate assistance to help a child learn the meaning of a word. An adult can
scaffold vocabulary by using a word in a sentence, defining a word multiple ways, pointing to pictures that represent
a word, or asking questions that help a child to further understand the meaning of a word.
19
behavior and academic outcomes (Durlak et al., 2011). Schools that provide opportunities for
children to work together through cooperative learning and small group activities (versus lectures
and rote learning techniques) are building the foundations of teamwork. Parent training and
family support programs also can reduce inefficient and coercive parenting styles that increase
child aggression (Patterson, 2002).
Initiative. Although initiative often is associated with leadership and “taking charge” of a
situation, the seeds of initiative begin very early in development. However, the different
contexts throughout the lifecycle result in all periods being an optimal stage for development of
the next more complex level of initiative.
During the early years, infants who depend on caregivers for guided interactions soon become
toddlers who venture into the world of their peers, with social play taking center stage. Indeed, it
has been said that play is the work of young children. Through directed play and other social
interactions, toddlers increasingly begin to operate with initiative and assert control over their
world. Erikson (1950; 1993) identified this stage (around ages 3-5) as critical for the earliest
development of initiative linked to exploration and making appropriate choices. Children learn
that their actions have reactions, and that to accomplish tasks they must engage in purposeful
behaviors. Exploration and initiative can be encouraged by allowing children certain “guided”
freedom to initiate activities (including pretend play) in structured settings and encouraging them
to explore new opportunities with appropriate levels of supervision.
During middle childhood as children enter primary school, they increasingly select their contexts
and experiences, and actively choose friendship groups, structured activities, and leisure pursuits
(Shiner, 1998), although this may vary significantly across cultures. All of these social contexts
work to shape children’s social initiative—guiding children towards or away from active
participation and leadership (Ladd, 1999). Through interpersonal feedback children learn how to
successfully influence and direct their environments and thus translate their initiative into
leadership. Not surprisingly, children with high levels of initiative tend to be pro-social leaders
(Chang, 2003). Longitudinal research also indicates that initiative in middle childhood is linked
with skill acquisition and lack of psychopathology38 in adolescence (Morrison & Masten, 1991).
Cross-culturally, adolescence is marked by varying degrees of increasing independence. This
independence brings new and different challenges, and adolescents are allowed and expected to
exercise more independent choices. Over time, they increasingly become agents in their own
lives (Larson & Hansen, 2005). This draws on their ability to effectively interact with adult
networks, to consider complex systems and actors, and to think strategically. Biologically, youth
who are willing to seek out new environments and experiences are likely to have strong initiative
and related leadership skills. Contexts can also be supportive of adolescent initiative. For
example, youth service programs operate across much of the world, and are a salient context for
stimulating initiative in adolescents. Organizations dedicated to service or social activism seem
to be particularly generative of leadership and agency, as these bodies call on youth to identify,
38 Psychopathology encompasses mental illness or distress and also the behaviors or experiences that signal mental
illness.
20
articulate, and take action on issues of concern to themselves and others (Larsen & Hansen,
2005).
During young adulthood, the transition to the labor market provides a novel context that both
requires and showcases initiative skills. At the onset of young adulthood, assets such as personal
agency shape the variety and type of career options that young people contemplate. Ultimately,
these skills help to crystalize young people’s final vocational choice (Nauta, Kahn, Angell, &
Cantarelli, 2002). Upward career mobility also depends on initiative skills—being autonomous,
accountable, and a self-starter can springboard a young adult towards higher occupational
achievement relative to previous generations (Elder, 1969). Likewise occupational choices
reciprocally feed personal agency (Nauta et al., 2002), and work contexts can nurture young
people’s initiative by providing feedback on social roles, norms, and self-perceptions (Roberts,
Caspi, & Moffitt, 2003).
Confidence. Confidence includes a realistic self-concept and positive feelings towards the self,
often labeled self-esteem or self-confidence, as well as beliefs about one's abilities, labeled self-
efficacy. Early social interactions with caregivers and others provide a broad foundation for the
development of confidence. Parents who encourage and support children foster a positive sense
of self, and adults who are harsh and negative can create early self-doubt. At the extreme, abuse
and trauma during the early years can have a lasting impact on an individual’s self-development,
as well as leading to a range of psychological and behavioral problems (National Scientific
Council on the Developing Child, 2010). However, from a skills development perspective,
children’s self-awareness and self-understanding begins to crystallize during middle childhood as
they begin to integrate the opinions of others in to their own self-understanding and the search
for self-identity and biological development of long-term perspective-taking makes adolescence
an optimal stage for confidence building, as well.
During middle childhood, confidence develops, in part, as children compare themselves with
others. Peers are an important source of social comparison, and studies have shown that children
increase markedly in these peer-based comparisons during middle childhood. This likely is due
to both their improved cognitive skills and ability to take the others’ perspective as well as their
increased exposure to larger peer groups in school. How children think they compare to peers
plays a major role in the development of their self-confidence. Low social status with peers can
lead to negative outcomes. Parent and teacher behavior also plays a critical role in the child’s
emerging sense of self and self-esteemexcessive punishment and criticism can have damaging
consequence for children (Harter, 2006).
Adolescence is marked by an increasing search for identity, as youth seek to find their “niche” in
the world. During this stage, future orientation lengthens, so that youth increasingly consider
their long-term options and evaluate their attributes against future goals. Youth who have skills
that are desirable in specific contexts as well as opportunities to develop and showcase these
skills are likely to build their self-confidence. For instance, a talented football player can build
confidence in settings where football skills are valued and opportunities for mastery and
performance are available.
21
During adolescence, confidence is largely considered a product of caregiving environments and,
more specifically, the person-context fit. For many youth, particularly those growing up in more
disadvantaged environments, there are few supportive contexts to learn or utilize skills that
increase self-confidence. In many cases, a teenager’s identity becomes wrapped up in skills that
are relatively easy to acquire and convey immediate status, such as power and aggression for
males or sexuality for females.
There is mixed evidence concerning whether and how to improve confidence skills. The current
consensus is to intervene around specific as opposed to global self-concept dimensions from
middle childhood through adolescence (Marsh & O'Mara, 2008). For instance, academic self-
concept, but not general self-esteem, longitudinally predicts higher academic achievement and
educational attainment. In fact, high general self-esteem can lead to heightened initiative and
persistence, but otherwise is of arguable relevance to labor market indicators (Baumeister,
Campbell, Krueger, & Vohs, 2003). Empirical evidence suggests that self-esteem should not be
nurtured indiscriminately, but instead should be fostered with realistic aims and effort towards
self-improvement.
In young adulthood, individuals often simultaneously enter work, social, and/or educational
contexts. Lack of confidence can be a significant impediment to exploration and success in these
new milieus (Nelson et al., 2008), whereas high self-esteem and self-efficacy predict successful
adaptation into new adult roles (Masten et al. 2004). The novel environments of young adulthood
also provide rich opportunities for confidence-building transitions into more productive roles.
Transitional contexts such as military service, apprenticeships, and continued education can
bolster positive self-identity and self-awareness and re-direct young adults onto healthier adult
trajectories (Masten et al. 2004). In addition “second chance opportunities” such as healthy
marriages and adoption of religious beliefs, can further lend emotional stability and positive
identity to young people, paving an alternate route to productive adulthood (Werner & Smith,
1982).
Ethics. A sense of ethics and moral obligation requires more advanced levels of cognitive
functioning that allow children to think about and reflect on their decisions. For this reason,
middle childhood and adolescence are particularly opportune times to support ethical
development, and school-based character education programs are quite popular.
Infants and toddlers develop a sense of right and wrong based on “getting caught” or being
punished. They generally consider outcomes such as damage done rather than intent in
assessments of wrongness. For example, preschoolers typically judge as “more wrong” a child
who accidentally breaks several cups rather than a child who intentionally breaks one cup
(Piaget, 1967). During the early years, external contingencies also work to control behavior. In
this fashion, early foundations of ethics skills are learned in contexts where rules are fair and
regularly enforced, and good behavior is modeled.
Moral and ethical reasoning develops appreciably during middle childhood, as children
progressively develop their empathic reasoning skills (Eisenberg et al., 1987). In tandem with
more varied social environments, these maturational abilities provide fertile ground for shaping
pro-social attitudes, character skills, and advanced moral thinking (Eisenberg & Fabes, 1998).
22
Children’s cognitive development is dominated by concrete thinking, which contributes to their
focus on clear “rules” in games, sports, and everyday life (Piaget, 1967).
The importance of rules coupled with increased capacity for empathy during middle childhood
provides a receptive context for efforts to build character in key areas such as honesty,
responsibility, and fairness. In many instances, this can be facilitated through peer and adult
modeling, as well as more structured discussions. For example, schools that foster open
discussion of controversial issues and allow students to probe their own opinions and consider
the views of their peers have been shown to cultivate a sense of obligation to the greater good
within their students (Flanagan, Cumsille, Gill, & Gallay, 2007). Overall, considering differing
viewpoints leads children to respect fairness, and not bully others (Brubacher, Fondacaro, Brank,
Brown, & Miller, 2009).
Adolescence is an important period for enhancing ethical skills because it corresponds with
enhanced cognitive flexibility, abstract thinking, and an increased capacity for perspective
taking. Aligned with these shifts, adolescents are able to understand moral actions not only in
terms of rules to be obeyed but also in terms of principles (such as justice) to be followed. This
can be enhanced through adult role models and opportunities for moral debate and action
(Berkowitz & Bier, 2004).
V. Evidence-Based Interventions for Social-Emotional Skill Enhancement to Build
PRACTICE Skills
Although we have presented and described a discrete set of PRACTICE skills linked to
education and employment outcomes, in real-world programming, skill-building interventions
target a wide array of skills in various combinations. Some programs focus on a single skill such
as achievement motivation, confidence, or ethics. Other programs include combinations of skills
such as problem solving and resilience, or broader combinations that include most of the
PRACTICE skills. To a certain extent, the specific skills targeted by a given program depend on
any number of factors including underlying program theory, agency priorities, cultural norms,
relevance for prevention of specific problems (e.g., violence, HIV/AIDS), and popular topics
(e.g., bullying prevention).
Still other programs focus on general enrichment without direct instruction in specific skills,
although it is easy to see how certain skills may be impacted. For example, children’s
participation in sports activities and orchestra programs are seen as valued activities in their own
right, although it also is likely that they have an impact on building skills such as self-control and
teamwork. Social policies such as conditional cash transfers (CCTs) and increased opportunities
for maternal employment also can indirectly impact skills, although effects can be negative for
some skills for some age groups, for instance, the negative effect of maternal employment
interventions on attachment in young children (Baydar & Brooks-Gunn, 1991; Sroufe, 1996).
Because most programs and policies target different skill sets, it is difficult to review
accumulated evidence on how best to promote each PRACTICE skill. Further, most program
evaluations focus on a particular outcome of interest to funders or policy makers (e.g., violence
23
prevention, grades in school) and generally do not measure a range of related social-emotional
skills or provide follow-up assessments of employment outcomes.
However, looking at the evidence across age groups and skill sets, certain directions for
investment are clear. We only consider a selection of programs with quasi-experimental or
experimental evidence of impact on a diverse set of social-emotional skills and related outcomes
that are closely aligned with the PRACTICE skills. We include programs being implemented in
the US, middle-income and developing countries, although most experimental studies have been
conducted in the US. Because policies and programs align roughly with the age groups
discussed in this paper, we organize the discussion accordingly. Table 3 presents selected
interventions, by age group and PRACTICE skill targeted, although in many cases we had to
infer skills targeted from program descriptions.39
Skill-Building Interventions by Age Group
The Early Years (ages 0-5): parenting and child-centered daycare/pre-school
There is a growing evidence-base for effective programs and practices to promote healthy
development given the neurobiological and psychosocial readiness of this age group. Most of
these programs focus on salient developmental contexts, specifically families, day care/pre-
school settings, and communities. However, because programs focused on developmental
contexts such as families and communities typically are part of broader capacity building and
resource development strategies (such as strengthening families), they rarely are framed or
evaluated in terms of children’s skill acquisition and future labor market success.
Interventions in early childhood can be grouped into three primary categories: (a) programs and
policies to help reduce parenting stress and teach parenting skills (such as home visitation and
parenting interventions; (b) programs to reduce toxic stress40 in communities (e.g., exposure to
violence, poverty, lack of opportunities) through community improvement and increased
services; and (c) programs to provide high-quality day care and preschool, including directed
skill building programs to enhance social-emotional learning.
Increasingly public policy is recognizing the value of “going into the home” to support parenting
practices. Perhaps the most well documented and widely used parent support program for
infants is home visitation, where new mothers receive individualized training in child
development and life management skills from trained nurses during pregnancy and after the birth
of their child. Several empirical studies have demonstrated positive outcomes for mothers
including fewer subsequent pregnancies, less use of welfare, and lower rates of child abuse and
neglect in the U.S. and many other countries (Olds et al., 1997). Short-term impacts on child
39 While many of the programs reviewed provide a package set of materials with specific protocols to follow, very
few programs specify the “active ingredients” or best practices on which their programs are based that can provide
more general guidance for investment in skill building.
40 The experience of serious, chronic adversity (e.g. chronic abuse or violence) without protective relationships or
contexts that can buffer the negative experience. Toxic stress causes prolonged stress responses that can alter the
brain’s chemistry and architecture (National Scientific Council on the Developing Child, 2010).
24
psychological, cognitive, and health outcomes also have been noted, although effects are more
limited for high-risk children (Peacock, Konrad, Watson, Nicke, & Muhajarine, 2013).
A number of different program models have been developed to reflect local needs. For example,
the Durham Connects program is a 4-7 session manualized program that addresses family needs
in home and connects high-risk parents with community resources to improve infant health and
well being. Several randomized controlled trials have found that program participants report
fewer infant emergency care visits, more community connections, more positive parenting
behaviors, and lower rates of mental health problems such as anxiety than the control group
(Dodge et al., 2014). (See Table 3.)
Programs to reduce toxic stress at the community level are quite broad and part of larger
community and economic development efforts that are beyond the scope of this paper.
Obviously, the most effective way to reduce the impact of community stressors on children and
families is to reduce the stressors themselvesalleviate poverty, reduce crime, provide adequate
services, etc. Yet this is the most difficult and costly path, requiring the greatest investment.
Given the broad range of these programs, they are not included in the inventory in Table 3.
Instead, most of the evidence base for early childhood programs centers on specific programs for
families and day-care/preschool programming. Day care and preschool programs to enhance
children’s social emotional skills are anchored in high quality settings, and frequently are
supplemented by focused skill-building programs. Much has been written in the psychological
and economics literature about the benefits of early investment in high quality preschool
programs such as enriched Head Start and the Perry Preschool Program, particularly when
followed by later enrichment programs (Cunha & Heckman, 2008). Through well-structured and
responsive environments that provide low student-teacher ratios, child-centered activities, and
opportunities for cooperative learning and structured play, these settings can promote a range of
skills including the PRACTICE skills control, teamwork, and initiative. Indeed, as noted in Table
3, many of the effective preschool programs specifically target these skills (Perry Preschool
Child Observation Record; High Scope Educational Research Foundation, 2010).
Similarly, a number of evidence-based programs currently are available to directly build social-
emotional skills in pre-school aged children. All of the interventions listed in Table 3 that target
the age group 0-5 address skills related to social interactions and teamwork, including
communication and relationship skills, empathy, prosocial behavior, and prevention of
aggression. Some of these programs incorporate a focus on self-control and initiative, such as
Second Step, whereas others, such as Tools of the Mind, specifically target only self-control
skills, with noted improvements following training.
Middle Childhood (ages 6-11): A Range of School Interventions
The peak target age for social-emotional skill development and greatest evidence base for
program effectiveness targeting social-emotional skills is for the 6-11 year old group (Durlak et
al., 2011). This is a prime period for impacting all of the PRACTICE skills. In some cases, this
will be accomplished most effectively via comprehensive programs that target all eight skills,
whereas in other cases, effective programs may focus on a sub-set of related skills, for instance
25
cooperative instructional models designed to impact skills involved in social interactions that
build teamwork or mastery learning interventions designed to improve achievement motivation.
Schools are a key venue for skill development for this age group. Primary schooling is nearly
universal in most countries, and most children worldwide spend at least some time in the primary
grades. The organization of the school day also lends itself to sustained skill-building efforts.
Children typically spend time in a single classroom with a single teacher and the same group of
peers for an entire school year. This “single point” of entry renders programs easier to
implement, less costly, and more likely to have consistent effects.
Interventions for the 6-11 age group may take various forms: (a) training teachers to possess
social-emotional skills that they can model in the classroom, (b) classroom lessons and activities
to improve classroom climate, (c) social-emotional skills curriculum taught as a school subject,
(d) teaching practices that incorporate social-emotional learning into the methodology for
teaching academic content, and (e) after-school enrichment programs.
For a teacher to incorporate social-emotional learning into the classroom, he must possess the
skills himself. Although this may be difficult in lower and middle-income countries with fewer
resources for training, there have been recent efforts to build training platforms in schools. For
example, Peru’s Escuela Amiga model developed a one-year social-emotional learning course for
teachers and principals. The course, taught in a university by professional psychologists,
included classroom instruction using a multi-session curriculum, role-playing, mentoring, and
peer support for two semesters. The teachers, all from marginal neighborhoods, received a
certificate on completing the training (World Bank, 2012). Though the program has not been
evaluated, the teachers who went through the training had notably calmer classrooms, used non-
standard teaching methodologies, and expressed that their initial reluctance in spending every
Saturday in a training course had enormous personal benefits, in addition to professional
benefits.
Skill building for children is enhanced when the classroom environment is more supportive and
engaging for children. A number of comprehensive programs are designed to provide lessons and
activities focused on direct learning and modifying the quality of the classroom environment.
For example, the RULER approach, trains principals and teachers to teach and practice a set of
tools designed to help students to recognize emotions emerging out of the school experience and
develop strategies to proactively manage these emotions in a positive way. In a recent
randomized trial in 5th and 6th grade classrooms, RULER classrooms were rated as having
higher levels of warmth and connectedness, and students were rated as higher on autonomy and
leadership skills (Rivers et al., 2012).
In some cases, the primary focus of the intervention is on classroom instruction, with social-
emotional classes included in the regular school curriculum. These classes are typically a
dedicated period on a regular basis in which teachers guide students through a curriculum with
accompanying materials to develop a pre-identified set of skills. They may focus on a range of
skills (PATHS in the US), specific behaviors such as decision-making (I Can Problem Solve in
the US; Social Decision-Making Skills Curriculum in Lebanon), or on a specific outcome such as
preventing bullying (Second Step in the United States, República Bolivariana de Venezuela, and
Norway) or drug use prevention (Lions Quest in the US, Young Citizen’s Program in Tanzania)
26
(Table 3). Several program curricula and packages for learning have been developed by
psychologists and implemented in different schools and can be purchased on line; some
programs provide training and support. In general, these approaches are somewhat less
comprehensive but easier and more straightforward to implement than school and classroom
improvement programs that require comprehensive engagement by teachers and administrators.
Pedagogical methods can be adapted to utilize social-emotional skills for academic learning.
Programs such as Facing History and Ourselves build skills such as communication and problem
solving into lessons about history and literature.41 For example, a teacher could present a lesson
on history or he could break the class into small groups that would prepare a lesson on a
historical fact in a limited amount of time and present it to the whole class, thereby teaching
history, as well as teamwork, relationship skills, empathy, communication skills, problem-
solving, self-regulation, self-esteem, and a range of other social-emotional skills. Such learning
can be monitored, as is traditional academic learning, through mechanisms such as the KIPP
Report card, where social-emotional skills are identified, measured, and discussed with parents
and students at evaluation time.
In addition to schools, sports, music, arts, and recreational after-school or out-of-school activities
can provide building blocks for social-emotional skills. As shown in Table 3, some of these
programs have been evaluated among middle school-aged children with positive results, such as
New Jersey After 3 in the US that offers a range of recreational activities and the Sport and Play
Program for Afghan Refugee and Pakistani Children. Recently, systematic randomized
controlled trials are being conducted of the effects of child and youth participation in orchestra
systems such as the El Sistema National Network of Youth and Children’s Orchestras
(Fundación Musical Simón Bolívar) in República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Although programs
such as youth orchestras are not designed a priori to teach specific skills, preliminary findings
suggest that they have a positive impact on self-regulation, prosocial behavior, collective
efficacy, persistence (GRIT), and well-being. To more effectively use this intervention type, it is
necessary to articulate more clearly the potential impact of these activities on skills. For
example, a soccer program may indirectly teach teamwork while a Futbol con Corazon model
run by child developmental specialists42 adjusts the soccer rules to teach a set of pre-determined
social-emotional skills, including teamwork and communication.
The effectiveness of school-based programs is supported by a number of individual studies as
well as recent comprehensive reviews. For example, Durlak et al. (2011) reviewed findings from
213 school-based universal social and emotional learning programs involving over 270,000
participants in different types of programs. Using meta-analytic techniques, they found that
compared to controls, SEL participants demonstrated significant improvements in a range of
social and emotional skills and an 11-percentile point gain in academic achievement.
Adolescence (ages 12-18) and Emerging or Young Adulthood (ages 19-29): Reaching at-risk and
Not at-risk Populations
41 https://www.facinghistory.org/
42 http://futbolconcorazon.org/
27
While some of the techniques discussed for children may be applicable to in-school youth
(teacher social-emotional learning, in-school social-emotional training, pedagogical methods –
see Table 3 for examples), school is a less optimal intervention venue for adolescents and is
particularly problematic for young adults. Especially in developing countries, many youth and
young adults are not in school, they operate in many contexts, schedules are varied, students
change classrooms and teachers regularly, and the influence of peers increases dramatically.
While school-based programs tend to be universal for all children, programs for adolescents and
young adults typically are more targeted to those most at-risk in community and agency settings.
The assumption is that resources should be reserved for those who are at a “skill disadvantage”
because they lack adequate building blocks from earlier developmental periods. This is important
to mention, because it highlights the primarily remedial focus of skill-building programs for
adolescents and young adults, even though neurobiological and psychosocial readiness to acquire
a new set of skills occurs for everyone in this age group. The exclusive programmatic focus on
at-risk youth has changed slightly in recent years with more calls for health promotion and
positive development programs for all youth.
Most adolescent and young adult programs that incorporate social-emotional skills or life skills
(the term more commonly used in programming for older youth and young adults) described in
Table 3 fall into five major program types: (a) prevention of problem behaviors, (b) arts,
recreation, and sports programs, (c) vocational training/job corps type programs, and (d) youth
engagement/service learning programs.
Programs to prevent problem behaviors typically include a direct focus on building life skills,
along with providing information and attitude-change strategies. For example, Life Skills
Training (Botvin & Griffin, 2004; Griffin, Botvin, Nichols, & Boyle, 2003) is a well-validated
substance abuse prevention program that incorporates life skills training in three areas relevant
for the PRACTICE model: problem solving (decision-making skills), teamwork (communication
skills), and initiative (assertiveness skills). These skills are emphasized because of their empirical
relations with substance abuse and prevention. Other such programs that have shown positive
effects on include Problem Solving for Life (depression) in Australia, Lions Quest Program (drug
use prevention) in the US, and Young Citizens Program (sexual health) in Tanzania (Table 3).
Arts, recreation, and sports programs for youth are similar to those discussed for middle-
childhood, but they may be less connected to schools and focus on more complex behaviors that
youth are ready to confront. Art, music, and theater-based programs will often use participant
experiences as the subject of their work, thereby providing a space within which to identify
emotions and develop strategies to manage them. The programs often foster mentoring,
teamwork, and positive social interactions. These program exist across the world, and several
have shown to effectively teach problem-solving, teamwork, and resilience skills in contexts as
different as the Youth Theater for Peace in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan, Sports and Play for
Traumatized Children and Youth in Iran (Table 3).
The other two types of programs may include a direct focus on skill building (often with a
separate curriculum). Many programs engage youth in employment training or civic engagement
and service learning activities as a means to indirectly enhance related skills. For example,
28
YouthBuild is a well-known international program that teaches youth construction and other
skills involved in community improvement projects, while indirectly emphasizing improvements
in social-emotional skills such as teamwork, initiative, and confidence. Evaluations from quasi-
experimental studies show improved life outcomes (educational progress, having a job) for
participating youth, although acquisition of specific skills has not been assessed (International
Youth Foundation, YouthBuild International, & Catholic Relief Services, 2010). 43 Using more
traditional training methods, programs such as Servol in Trinidad and Tobago provide youth with
marketable job skills while also emphasizing social-emotional skills such as control and
confidence. In a tracer study of program outcomes, participants had higher self-confidence and
improvements in related behavior such as delay in childbearing for females (Griffith, 2002).
However, in many cases the influence is indirect through engagement in the program.
Comprehensive programming and multi-sectoral approaches for reaching out of school youth is
challenging (USAID, 2013). Not only do these programs vary in their specific focus, they often
are funded by different sectors. For instance, violence prevention programs often are funded by
citizen security and justice sectors; arts, recreation, and sports often are funded by the youth
sector; and vocational development programs typically fall under Departments or Ministries of
Labor. Drawing these together in a cohesive strategy has been an elusive task.
VI. Summary and Future Directions
The social-emotional skills that employers value can be effectively taught when taking into
consideration the optimal stage for each skill development. Employers value a range of social-
emotional skills, which can be classified into eight skills groups summarized in the acronym
PRACTICE. These skills – problem solving, resilience, achievement motivation, control,
teamwork, initiative, confidence, and ethics – are best developed before reaching the labor
market, and serve to enhance school performance as well as a range of other welfare enhancing
outcomes.
The optimal stage for development of PRACTICE skills is during middle-childhood. While
recent emphasis has been put on the teaching social-emotional skills during the early childhood
period, this period is actually too young to acquire some skills that require higher levels of
neurobiological or psychosocial development or contexts that are only appropriate for older
children. This implies that we need to refine our concept of the appropriate age for skill
development based on the prerequisites for each skill to develop.
A broad international evidence base on effective program interventions at the right stage can
guide policy makers to incorporate social-emotional learning into their school curriculum. This
review does not allow for a differentiation of appropriate ages for PRACTICE skills
development by cultural context, suggesting an adaptation of the paper’s parameters to the
relevant context.
Early childhood programming for children ages 0-5--home visitation, family support, and
enriched preschool programs are becoming more available in many countries and settings. These
43 http://youthbuildinternational.org/
29
programs help families learn effective parenting skills and support parent-child connections,
setting the stage for early attachment relationships and providing an important foundation for
skill building. A clear mandate is to extend the reach of these programs and adapt them to
contexts with scarce resources. For example, parents and other family members (grandparents,
aunts, uncles, etc.) can be trained as "promotoras" or lay outreach workers to engage and support
new parents and families and to teach them effective parenting skills (Williamson, Knox, Guerra
& Williams, in press).
Schools need to play a much larger role in development of PRACTICE skills. Primary school is
the best environment that children have to teach these skills since coverage is very high in almost
all countries and students are with one teacher and one set of peers thus allowing for practice and
reinforcement of skills. International evidence shows that primary school children can develop
and crystalize social-emotional skills indirectly through teacher modeling and reinforcement in a
positive school setting, but this requires professional, trained teachers, who also recognize the
importance of skill building and student engagement. In countries across the world, children
have learned these skills directly through classroom-based lessons, pedagogical methods that
teach academic content using PRACTICE skills, and through after school programs.
Although adolescence is an optimal period for development of several PRACTICE skills, there
are considerably fewer carefully evaluated skill building programs for adolescents and young
adults. Programming for adolescents typically occurs indirectly through youth development and
extra-curricular activities such as sports, arts, and music, but few programs specify or measure
target skills and whether they are impacted by specific activities. Most specific skills-intensive
interventions for these age groups is targeted at at-risk youth and young adults through second
chance programming for remedial education and/or vocational and job skills training. Although
these programs often incorporate training in a range of skills, a specific framework typically does
not guide them to select the most relevant skills for long-term employment impact.
More research on effective interventions to build PRACTICE skills is needed. The particular
gaps are in programs for youth who are not at-risk, very young children, and young adults.
Further, more research in various cultural contexts and with specific populations, such as rural
youth or those living in conflict zones, is also needed.
30
References
Aber, J. L., Brown, J. L., & Jones, S. M. (2003). Developmental trajectories toward violence in
middle childhood: Course, demographic differences, and response to school-based intervention.
Developmental Psychology, 39, 324-348.
Aber, J. L., Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Chaudry, N., & Samples, F. (1998). Resolving conflict
creatively: Evaluating the developmental effects of a school-based violence prevention program
in neighborhood and classroom context. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 187-213.
Anderson, P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood.
Child Neuropsychology, 8(2), 71-82.
Armecin, G., Behrman, J., Duazo, P., Ghuman, S., Gultiano, S., King, E., & Lee, N. (2006).
Early childhood development through an integrated program: Evidence from the Philippines.
World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 3922, May 2006.
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through
the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480.
Attanasio, O. P., Kugler, A. D., & Meghir, C. (2009). Subsidized vocational training for
disadvantaged youth in developing countries: Evidence from a randomized trial. Discussion
Paper no. 4251, IZA (Institute for the Study of Labor), Bonn. Retrieved from
http://ftp.iza.org/dp4251.pdf.
Baker-Henningham, H., Walker, S., Powell, C., & Meeks-Gardner, J. (2009). A pilot study of the
incredible years teacher training programme and a curriculum unit on social and emotional skills
in community pre-schools in Jamaica. Child: Care, Health and Development, 35(5), 624-631.
Bandiera, O., Buehren, N., Burgess, R., Goldstein, M., Gulesci, S., Rasul, I., & Sulaiman, M.
(December, 2012). Empowering adolescent girls: Evidence from a randomized control trial in
Uganda. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved online from
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/01/17385468/empowering-adolescent-girls-
uganda.
Barrett, P. M., Farrell, L. J., Ollendick, T. H., & Dadds, M. (2006). Long-term outcomes of an
Australian universal prevention trial of anxiety and depression symptoms in children and youth:
An evaluation of the friends program. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35
(3), 403-411.
Barrett, P. M., Sonderegger, R., & Sonderegger, N. L. (2001). Evaluation of an anxiety-
prevention and positive-coping program (friends) for children and adolescents of non-English
speaking background. Behaviour Change, 18, 78-91.
31
Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem
cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological
Science in the Public Interest, 4(1), 1-44.
Baydar, N., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1991). Effects of maternal employment and child-care
arrangements on preschoolers' cognitive and behavioral outcomes: Evidence from the children of
the national longitudinal survey of youth. Developmental Psychology, 27(6), 932.
Benítez, J. L., Fernández, M., Jusiticia, F., Fernández, E., & Jusitica, A. (2011). Results of the
aprender a convivir program for development of social competence and prevention of antisocial
behavior in four-year-old children. School Psychology International, 32, 3-19.
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-based character education. The Annals of the
American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 72-85.
Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M. T., Blair,
C., Nelson, K. E., & Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social-emotional school readiness:
The head start REDI program. Child Development, 79, 1802-1817.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence
predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention.
Child Development, 78, 246-263.
Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: The
promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and
Psychopathology, 20, 899.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. (2007). Tools of the mind. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Bonhauser, M., Fernandez, G., Püschel, K., Yañez, F., Montero, J., Thompson, B., & Coronado,
G. (2005). Improving physical fitness and emotional well-being in adolescents of low socio-
economic status in Chile: Results of a school-based controlled trial. Health Promotion
International, 20, 113-122.
Botvin, G. J., & Griffin, K. W. (2004). Life skills training: Empirical findings and future
directions. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 25, 211-232.
Boyle, D., & Hassett-Walker, C. (2008). Reducing overt and relational aggression among youth:
The results from a two-year outcome evaluation. Journal of School Violence, 7, 27-42.
Brady, M., Assaad, R., Ibrahim, B., Salem, A., Salem, R., & Zibani, N. (2007). Providing new
opportunities to adolescent girls in socially conservative settings: The ishraq program in rural
upper Egypt. New York, NY: Population Council. Retrieved from
http://www.popcouncil.org/pdfs/IshraqFullReport.pdf
32
Brubacher, M. R., Fondacaro, M. R., Brank, E. M., Brown, V. E., & Miller, S. A. (2009).
Procedural justice in resolving family disputes: Implications for childhood bullying. Psychology,
Public Policy, and Law, 15(3), 149.
Brunwasser, S. M., Gillham, J. E., & Kim, E. S. (2009). A meta-analytic review of the Penn
resiliency program’s effect on depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 77, 1042-1054. doi:10.1037/a0017671
Bushman, B., & Huesmann, L. R. (2002). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In D.
Singer, & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Campos, J. J., Campos, R. G., & Barrett, K. C. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of
emotional development and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25, 394-402. doi:
10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.394
Card, D., Ibarrarán, P., Regalia, F., Rosas-Shady, D., Soares, Y. (2011). The labor market
impacts of youth training in the Dominican Republic. Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 267-299.
Carlson, M., Brennan, R. T., & Earls, F. (2012). Enhancing adolescent self-efficacy and
collective efficacy through public engagement around HIV/AIDS competence: A multilevel,
cluster randomized-controlled trial. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 1078-1087.
CASEL (2012). Consortium for social and emotional learning. Retrieved online from
www.casel.org.
Chang, L. (2003). Variable effects of children's aggression, social withdrawal, and prosocial
leadership as functions of teacher beliefs and behaviors. Child Development, 74(2), 535-548.
Clinton, A., & Amesty, E. (2010). Community participation in the cultural adaptation of a
prevention curriculum. School Psychology International, 31, 467–477.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention
trial for conduct problems ii: Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,
67, 648-657.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group (2010). The effects of a multiyear universal
social-emotional learning program: The role of student and school characteristics. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 156-168.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-
processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101.
Crone, E. A., & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective
engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 636-650.
33
Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2008). Formulating, identifying and estimating the technology of
cognitive and noncognitive skill formation. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 738-782.
Cunningham, W. & Villaseñor, P. (2014) Employer Voices, Employer Demands, and
Implications for Public Skills Development Policy. Policy Research Working Paper #6853
Washington, DC: World Bank.
Deák, G. O. (2003). The development of cognitive exibility and language abilities. In R. Vasta
& R. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior, Vol. 31 (pp. 271–327). San
Diego: Academic Press.
Delajara, M., Freije, S., & Soloaga, I. (2006). An evaluation of training for the unemployed in
Mexico. Office of Evaluation and Oversight, Inter-American Development Bank. Washington,
DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved online from
http://idbdocs.iadb.org/WSDocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=907641&Cache=True
Díaz, J. J., & Jaramillo, M. (2006, October). An evaluation of the Peruvian youth labour training
program- PROJOVEN. Office of Evaluation and Oversight, Inter-American Development Bank.
Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank. Retrieved online from
http://idbdocs.iadb.org/wsdocs/getdocument.aspx?docnum=907634.
Domitrovich, C. E., Cortes, R. C., & Greenberg, M. T. (2007). Improving youth children’s social
and emotional competence: A randomized trial of the preschool “PATHS” curriculum. The
Journal of Primary Prevention, 28, 67-91.
Dodge, K. A., Goodman, W. B., Murphy, R. A., O'Donnel, K., Sato, J., & Guptill, S. (2014).
Implementation and randomized controlled trial evaluation of universal postnatal nurse home
visiting. American Journal of Public Health, 104, 134-143.
Dubow, E. F., & Tisak, J. (1989). The relation between stressful life events and adjustment in
elementary school children: The role of social support and social problem-solving skills. Child
Development, 60, 1412-1423.
Duckworth, K., Duncan, G. J., Kokko, K., Lyyra, A., Metzger, M., & Simonton, S. (2012). The
relative importance of adolescent skills and behaviors for adult earnings: A cross-national study.
University of London, Department of Quantitative Social Science Working Paper No. 12-03.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B . (2011).
The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-
based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432.
Durston, S., & Casey, B. J. (2006). What have we learned about cognitive development from
neuroimaging? Neuropsychologia ,44, 2149-2157.
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10),
1040.
34
Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and
personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
Eagle, K., Miller, T., Cooc, N., LaFleur, J., & Reisner, E. (2009, April). Evaluation of New
Jersey after 3: Reaching and engaging New Jersey’s youth through afterschool programs, 2005-
2008. New Brunswick, NJ: Policy Studies Associates. Retrieved online from
http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED508146.pdf
Eisen, M., Zellman, G. L., & Murray, D. M. (2003). Evaluating the lions—quest “skills for
adolescence” drug education program second-year behavior outcomes. Addictive Behaviors, 28,
883-897. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00292-1
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (series Ed.) & N.
Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed.): Vol. 3. Social, emotional and
personality development (pp. 701–778). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Eisenberg, N., Shell, R., Pasternack, J., Lennon, R., Beller, R., & Mathy, R. M. (1987). Prosocial
development in middle childhood: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 23, 712.
Elder Jr, G. H. (1969). Occupational mobility, life patterns, and personality. Journal of Health
and Social Behavior, 10(4), 308-323.
El Hassan, K., & Mougaine, Z. (2013). Implementation of the social decision-making skills
curriculum on primary students (grades 1-3) in Lebanon. School Psychology International, 34, 1-
9.
Elias, M. J., Gara, M., Ubriaco, M., Rothbaum, P. A., Clabby, J. F., & Schuyler, T. (1986).
Impact of a preventive social problem solving intervention on children's coping with middle-
school stressors. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 259-275.
Erikson, E. (1950, 1993). Childhood and society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Flanagan, C. A., Cumsille, P., Gill, S., & Gallay, L. S. (2007). School and community climates
and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 99, 421.
Fox, N. A., Henderson, H. A., Rubin, K. H., Calkins, S. D., & Schmidt, L. A. (2001). Continuity
and discontinuity of behavioral inhibition and exuberance: Psychophysiological and behavioral
influences across the first four years of life. Child Development, 72, 1-21.
Gold, C., Voracek, M., & Wigram, T. (2004). Effects of music therapy for children and
adolescents with psychopathology: A meta-analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and
Psychiatry, 45, 1054-1063.
Gold, C., Wigram, T., & Voracek, M. (2005). Effectiveness of music therapy for children and
adolescents with psychopathology: A quasi-experimental study. Psychotherapy Research, 17,
35
289-296.
Goldschmidt, P., & Huang, D. (2007, June). The long-term effects of after-school programming
on education adjustment and juvenile crime: A study of LA’s BEST after-school program. Los
Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
Retrieved online from
http://www.lasbest.org/what/publications/LASBEST_DOJ_Final%20Report.pdf
Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., & Speltz, M. (1991). Emotional regulation, self-control, and
psychopathology: The role of relationships in early childhood. In D. Cicchetti & S. L. Toth,
(Eds.), Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction Rochester Symposium on
Developmental Psychopathology (Vol. 2, pp. 21-55). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Griffin, K. W., Botvin, G. J., Nichols, T. R., & Doyle, M. M. (2003). Effectiveness of a universal
drug abuse prevention approach for youth at high risk for substance use initiation. Preventative
Medicine, 36, 1-7.
Griffith, J. (2002). To handle life's challenges: A tracer study of Servol's Adolescent
Development Programme in Trinidad. Early childhood development: Practice and reflections.
Following footsteps. Bernard van Leer Foundation, PO Box 82334, 2508 EH, The Hague,
Netherlands.
Groh, M., Krishman, N., McKenzie, D., & Vishwanath, T. (2012, July). The impact of training
and wage subsidy programs on female youth employment in Jordan. Impact Evaluation Series
No. 62. Washington, DC: The World Bank Development Research Group Finance and Private
Sector Development Team and Middle East and North African Region Social and Economic
Development Unit. Retrieved online from
http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469372&piPK
=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000158349_20120723102944&cid=DEC_PolicyRe
searchEN_D_INT.
Grossman, D. C., Neckerman, H. J., Koepsell, T. D., Liu, P., Asher, K. N., Beland, K., & Rivara,
F. P. (1997). Effectiveness of a violence prevention curriculum among children in elementary
school: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 277, 1605-1611.
Guerra, N. G., & Bradshaw, C. (2008). Core competencies to prevent problem behaviors and
promote positive youth development. New Directions in Child and Adolescent Development,
122. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Guerra, N. G., Boxer, P., & Kim, T. E. (2005). A cognitive-ecological approach to serving
students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Application to aggressive behavior.
Behavioral Disorders, 30, 277-288.
Guerra, N. G., Williams, K. R., Meeks-Gardner, J. M., & Walker, I. (2010). The Kingston YMCA
positive youth development programme: Impact on violence among at-risk youth in Jamaica.
36
Kingston: Caribbean Child Development Centre, University of the West Indies. Retrieved online
from http://ksu.edu.sa/sites/KSUArabic/Research/ncys/Documents/r380.pdf.
Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. J., & Cole, R. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st
grade to 12th grade: Effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors.
Developmental Psychology, 39, 777-789.
Harter, S. (2006). The self. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of
child psychology. New York: Wiley.
Harvey, B., Stuart, J., & Swan, T. (2000). Evaluation of a drama-in-education programme to
increase AIDS awareness in South African high schools: A randomized community intervention
trial. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 11, 105-111.
Hazen, N. L., & Black, B. (1989). Preschool peer communication skills: The role of social status
and interaction context. Child Development, 867-876.
Heckman, J. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from
the GED testing program. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 145-149.
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive
abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior (No. w12006). National Bureau of
Economic Research.
HighScope Educational Research Foundation. (2010). HighScope Child Observation Record kit.
Ypsilanti, MI: HighScope Press.
Holmand. H., & Silva. O. (2009). Targeting non-cognitive skills to improve cognitive outcomes:
Evidence from a remedial education intervention. IZA discussion paper series No. 4476.
Holsen, I., Smith, B. H., & Frey, K. S. (2008). Outcomes of the social competence program
second step in Norwegian elementary schools. School Psychology International, 29, 71-88.
Hunter, S. S. (2002). Supporting and expanding community-based HIV/AIDS prevention and
care responses: A report on save the children (US) Malawi COPE project. Social Protection
Labor Markets, Pension, and Social Assistance. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Retrieved
online from http://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/hdnspu/25526.html
Huston, A. C., & Ripke, M. N. (Eds.). (2006). Developmental contexts in middle childhood:
Bridges to adolescence and adulthood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hyatt, S., & Auten, S. (2011, May). Evaluation of the Palestinian youth empowerment program
(RUWWAD). Prepared by Aguirre Division, JBS International, Inc. Washington, D.C.: USAID.
Retrieved online from
http://www.gem2.org/sites/default/files/Ruwwad%20Evaluation%20Final%20Report%20051520
11.pdf
37
Ibarrarán, P., Ripani, L., Taboada, B., Villa, M. J., & Garcia, B. (2012). Life skills, employability,
and training for disadvantaged youth: Evidence from a randomized evaluation design. Inter-
American Development Bank Working Paper Series No. IDB-WP-342. Washington, DC: Inter-
American Development Bank. Retrieved online from
http://issuu.com/idb_publications/docs/working_en_78218.
International Youth Foundation, Youthbuild International & Catholic Relief Services. (2010).
Executive summary: International Youth Foundation follow-up study “Central American Youth
Builders Program.” Baltimore, MD: Author.
Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkle, K., Puren, A., & Duvvury, N. (2008).
Impact of stepping stones on incidence of HIV and HSV-2 and sexual behavior in rural South
Africa: Cluster randomized controlled trial. BMJ, 337: a506.
Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Aber, J. L. (2011). Two-year impacts of a universal school-based
social-emotional and literacy intervention: An experiment in translational developmental
research. Child Development, 82, 533-554
Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial
of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after one school
year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829-842.
Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits--self-esteem,
generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job
performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80-92.
Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2007). Capitalizing on one’s advantages: Role of core self-
evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1212-1227.
Kagan, J., & Herschkowitz, N. (2005). A young mind in a growing brain. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kisiel, C., Blaustein, M., Spinazzola, J., Schmidt, C. S., Zucker, M., & van der Kolk, B. (2006).
Evaluation of a theater-based youth violence prevention program for elementary school children.
Journal of School Violence, 5, 19-36.
Knudsen, E. I., Heckman, J. J., Cameron, J. L., & Shonkoff, J. P. (2006). Economic,
neurobiological, and behavioral perspectives on building America’s future workforce. PNAS,
103, 10155-10162.
Kuhn, D. (2006). Do cognitive changes accompany developments in the adolescent brain?
Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 59-67.
38
Kumpfer, K. L., Alvarado, R., Tait, C., & Turner, C. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based
family and children’s training for substance abuse prevention among 6-8 year-old rural children.
Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, S65-S71.
Kunz, V. (2006). Sport and play for traumatized children and youth: An assessment of a pilot-
project in Bam, Iran, by the Swiss Academy for Development. Swiss Academy for Development
(SAD).Retrieved from http://www.sad.ch/index.php/en/publications/23-sport-and-play-for-
traumatized-children-and-youth.
Ladd, G. W. (1999). Peer relationships and social competence during early and middle
childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 333-359.
Lahey, B. B. (2009). Public health significance of neuroticism. American Psychologist, 64, 241-
256.
Larson, R., & Hansen, D. (2005). The development of strategic thinking: Learning to impact
human systems in a youth activism program. Human Development, 48, 327-349.
Lerner, R. M. &, Lerner, J. V. (2009). Waves of the Future: Report of the Findings from the First
Six Years of the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development. Medford, MA, and Chevy Chase,
MD: Tufts University. Retrieved online from www.4-h.org/About-4-H/Research/4-H-PYD-
Study-Wave-6.dwn.
Lerner, R. M. (2013). Concepts and theories of human development. Psychology Press.
Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2004). Education and the Changing Job Market. Educational
Leadership, 62, 80.
Lies, J. M., Bock, T., Brandenberger, J., & Trozzolo, T. A. (2012). The effects of off-campus
service learning on the moral reasoning of college students. Journal of Moral Education, 41,
189-199.
Lock, S., & Barrett, P. M. (2003). A longitudinal study of developmental differences in universal
preventive intervention for child anxiety. Behaviour Change, 20, 183–199.
Lynch, K. B., Geller, S. R., & Schmidt, M. G. (2004). Multi-year evaluation of the effectiveness
of a resilience-based prevention program for young children. The Journal of Primary Prevention,
24, 335-353.
Marsh, H. W., & O'Mara, A. (2008). Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-
esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and
multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34,
542-552.
39
Masten, A., Burt, K. B., Roisman, G. I., Obradović, J., Long, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004).
Resources and resilience in the transition to adulthood: Continuity and change. Development and
Psychopathology, 16, 1071-1094.
McMahon, S. D., & Washburn, J. J. (2003). Violence prevention: An evaluation of program
effects with urban African American students. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 43-62.
Moreira, P., Crusellas, L., Sá, I., Gomez, P., & Matias, C. (2010). Evaluation of a manual-based
programme for the promotion of social and emotional skills in elementary school children:
Results from a 4-year study in Portugal. Health Promotion International, 25, 309-317.
Morrison, P., & Masten, A. S. (1991). Peer reputation in middle childhood as a predictor of
adaptation in adolescence: A sevenyear followup. Child Development, 62, 991-1007.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2007). The timing and quality of early
experiences combine to shape brain architecture: Working paper No. 5. Retrieved online from
http://www.developingchild.net.
National Scientific Council on the Developing Child (2010). Early experiences can alter gene
expression and affect long-term development: Working paper No. 10. Retrieved online from
http://www.developingchild.net.
Nauta, M. M., Kahn, J. H., Angell, J. W., & Cantarelli, E. A. (2002). Identifying the antecedent
in the relation between career interests and self-efficacy: Is it one, the other, or both? Journal of
Counseling Psychology, 49, 290.
Nelson, L. J., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Badger, S., Barry, C. M., Carroll, J. S., & Madsen, S. D.
(2008). Associations between shyness and internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, and
relationships during young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 605-615.
Nigmatov, V. (2011). Youth theater for peace (YTP) programs in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan:
Final evaluation.
Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., ... &
Caspi, A. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult
outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673-716.
Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., ... & Luckey, D.
(1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect.
Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 637-643.
Olson, S. L., Schilling, E. M., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Measurement of impulsivity: Construct
coherence, longitudinal stability, and relationship with externalizing problems in middle
childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 151-165.
40
Parker, J. D., Creque, R. E., Barnhart, D. L., Harris, J. I., Majeski, S. A., Wood, L. M., & Hogan,
M. J. (2004). Academic achievement in high school: Does emotional intelligence matter?
Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1321-1330.
Patterson, G. R. (2002). The early development of coercive family processes. In J. B. Reid, G. R.
Patterson, & J. Snyder (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in children and adolescents (pp. 24-44).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Peacock, S., Conrad, S., Watson, E., Nickel, D., & Nuhajarine, N. (2013). Effectiveness of home
visiting programs on child outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 13:17.
doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-17.
Piaget, J. (1967). Six psychological studies. Vintage Books: New York.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2000). Developing mechanisms of self-regulation.
Development and Psychopathology, 12, 427-441.
Rauber, M. (2007). Non-cognitive skills and success in life: The importance of motivation and
self-regulation. Diskussionpapier Nr. 07/14. Centre for European Economic Research.
Reddy, L. A., & Goldstein, A. P. (2001). Aggression replacement training: A multimodal
intervention for aggressive adolescents. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 18, 47-62.
Reischl, T. M., Zimmerman, M. A., Morrel-Samuela, S., Franzen, S. P., Faulk, M., Eisman, A.
B., & Roberts, E. (2011). Youth empowerment solutions for violence prevention. Adolescent
Medicine: State of the Art Review, 22, 581-600.
Right To Play International (2010). Our report on progress: 10 years of play 200I-2010.
Toronto, Ontario, CA: Author. Retrieved online from
http://www.righttoplay.ch/moreinfo/aboutus/Documents/Results%20(2010).pdf
Rivers, S. E., Brackett, M. A., Reyes, M. R., Elbertson, N. A., & Salovey, P. (2012). Improving
the social and emotional climate of classrooms: A clustered randomized controlled trial testing
the RULER approach. Prevention Science, 14, 77-87.
Roberts, B. W., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2003). Work experiences and personality
development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582.
Roberts, B. W. and W. F. DelVecchio (2000). “The Rank-Order Consistency of Personality
Traits from Childhood to Old Age: A quantitative Revive of Longitudinal Studies”,
Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 126, No. 1, pp. 3-25.
Roberts, B. W., Wood, D., & Smith, J. L. (2005). Evaluating five factor theory and social
investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality,
39(1), 166-184.
41
Schick, A., & Cierpka, M. (2005). Faustlos: Evaluation of a curriculum to prevent violence in
elementary schools. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 11, 157-165.
Schmidt, C. D., McAdams, C. R., & Foster, V. (2009). Promoting the moral reasoning of
undergraduate business students through a deliberate psychological education-based classroom
intervention. Journal of Moral Education, 38, 315-334.
Schochet, P. Z., Burghardt, J., & McConnell, S. (2008). Does Job Corps work? Impact findings
from the national job corps study. The American Economic Review, 98, 18641886.
Search Institute (2013). 40 Assets. Retrieved online from http://www.search-institute.org.
Segal, C. (2008). Classroom behavior. The Journal of Human Resources, 43, 783-814.
Selman, R. L., Barr, B., Boulay, B., Bermudez, A., Gamse, B., Lowenstein, E., & Stoskopf, A.
(2007). What works in Character Education: A case study of Facing History and Ourselves—
Experimental evaluation. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
Shiner, R. L. (1998). How shall we speak of children's personalities in middle childhood? A
preliminary taxonomy. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 308-332.
Shiner, R. L. (2000). Linking childhood personality with adaptation: Evidence for continuity and
change across time into late adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 310-
321.
Shonkoff, J. P., & Levitt, P. (2010). Neuroscience and the future of early childhood policy:
moving from why to what and how. Neuron, 67(5), 689-691.
Shure, M. B., & Spivack, G. (1982). Interpersonal problem solving in young children: A
cognitive approach to prevention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, 341-356.
Sowell, E. R., Delis, D., Stiles, J., & Jernigan, T. L. (2001). Improved memory functioning and
frontal lobe maturation between childhood and adolescence: A structural MRI study. Journal of
the International Neuropsychological Society, 7(3), 312-322.
Spence, S. H., Sheffield, J. K., & Donovan, C. L. (2003). Preventing adolescent depression: An
evaluation of the problem solving for life program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 71, 3-13.
Sroufe, A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years.
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking.
Developmental Review, 28, 78-106.
42
Ter Weel, B. (2008). The noncognitive determinants of labor market and behavioral outcomes.
The Journal of Human Resources, 4, 729-737.
USAID (2013). State of the field report: Holistic, cross-sectoral youth development. Retrieved
online from http://www.usaid.gov/documents/1865/state-field-report-holistic-cross-sectoral-
youth-development.
Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, J., & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early-onset
conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of
Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 105-124.
Werner, E. E. (1993). Risk, resilience, and recovery: Perspectives from the Kauai longitudinal
study. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 503-503.
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1982). Vulnerable but invincible: A study of resilient children.
New York: McGraw-Hill
Whiting, B., & Edwards, C. (1988). Children of different worlds. The formation of social
behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williamson, A. A., Knox, L., Guerra, N. G., & Williams, K. R. (in press). A pilot randomized
trial of community-based parent training for immigrant Latina mothers. American Journal of
Community Psychology.
World Bank (2012). Escuela Amiga: Social Emotional Learning in Peruvian Schools.
Yassin, S., Hasan, F., Amin, W., & Amiruddin, N. (2008). Implementation of generic skills in the
curriculum. EDU-COM International Conference, research online.
Yeager Sallah, J. A. (2006). Community Youthpeace Education Program: Mid-term evaluation
final report. USAID: Office of Transition Initiatives. Retrieved online from
http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PDACG877.pdf.
Yu, D. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Preventing depressive symptoms in Chinese children.
Prevention & Treatment, 5, 9-39.
43
Table 3. Interventions by primary ages and skills targeted
Program
Program
Type
Age
Group
Location(s)
Skills Targeted
Outcomes
Citation(s)
Durham Connects
Home
Visitation
Infants
USA
Resilience
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
Fewer infant emergency care
visits, more community
connections, more positive
parenting behaviors, and lower
rates of anxiety
Dodge et al. (2014)
Early Child
Development
Program
Parent
Training
0-5
Philippines
Resilience
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
Increased cognitive, linguistic,
and fine motor skills,
improved social-emotional
skills and nutrition
Armecin et al.
(2006)
Incredible Years
Series
-Dinosaur School
Child Curriculum
(also includes
parent- and teacher-
training
components)
Social-
Emotional
Learning plus
Parent/
Teacher
Training
0-5
Jamaica:
Teacher
Training and
adapted
Dinosaur
School lessons
USA:
Dinosaur
School lessons
Resilience
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Empathy
-Low aggression
Jamaica: Increased positive
teacher behaviors and positive
child behaviors, increased
child interest and enthusiasm,
improved teacher warmth and
class climate
USA: behavioral
improvements
Jamaica: Baker-
Hinningham et al.
(2009)
USA: Webster-
Stratton, Reid, &
Hammond (2004)
Aprender a
Convivir Program
Social-
Emotional
Learning
0-5
Spain
Control
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Emotion knowledge
-Low aggression
Improved social competencies
and reduced antisocial
behaviors
Benítez et al.
(2011)
44
Al’s Pals: Kids
Making Healthy
Choices
Social-
Emotional
Learning
0-5, 6-11
(specifical
ly for ages
3-8)
USA
Resilience defined as
social competence,
problem-solving,
autonomy, and sense of
purpose/belief in future
Improved social-emotional
competence and positive
coping skills
Lynch, Geller, &
Schmidt (2004)
Tools of the Mind
Social-
Emotional
Learning
0-5
USA
Control
-Attentional focus
-Self-regulation
Improved self-regulation and
executive functioning skills in
children from low-income
families
Bodrova & Leong
(2007)
Head Start REDI
program combined
with PATHS
Preschool Version
Social
Emotional
Learning,
integrated
with
Academics
0-5
USA
Problem-solving
Control
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
Improved literacy and
vocabulary skills, increased
emotional understanding,
social problem-solving, social
behavior, and learning
engagement.
Bierman et al.
(2008)
PATHS
Preschool and
Elementary School
versions
Social-
Emotional
Learning
0-5, 6-11
USA
Problem-solving
Control
Teamwork
-Emotional
understanding
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Increased emotional
knowledge, skills, and social
competence
0-5: Domitrovich,
Cortes, &
Greenberg (2007)
6-11: Conduct
Problems
Prevention
Research Group
(1999, 2010)
Social Decision-
Making Skills
Curriculum
Social-
Emotional
Learning
6-11
Lebanon
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making
Improved emotional
intelligence and social skills
El Hassan &
Mougaine (2013)
I Can Problem
Solve
Social-
Emotional
Learning
0-5, 6-11
USA
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making
Decreased impulsivity and
improved behavior among
ages 0-5; improved social
Boyle & Hassett-
Walker (2008);
Kumpfer,
45
competencies and self-control
among ages 6-12
Alvarado, Tait, &
Turner (2002);
Shure & Spivack
(1982)
Second Step
Segundo Paso in
Venezuela, RB
Steg for Steg in
Norway
Faustlos in
Germany
Violence
Prevention
0-5, 6-11
0-5
6-11
6-11
USA
Venezuela,
RB
Norway
Germany
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making
Control
-Self-regulation
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Low aggression
Initiative
Increased empathy and
prosocial behavior
Venezuela, RB: Improved
social competencies
Norway: Improved social
competencies
Germany: Improved social
competencies
USA: Grossman et
al. (1997);
McMahon &
Washburn (2003)
Venezuela, RB:
Clinton & Amesty
(2010)
Norway: Holsen,
Smith, & Frey
(2008)
Germany: Schick &
Cierpka (2005)
4 Rs (Reading,
Writing, Respect, &
Resolution)
Program
Social-
Emotional
Learning,
integrated
with
Academics
6-11
USA
Problem-Solving
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Emotion intelligence
Reduced hostile attribution
bias and depressive symptoms;
increased social skills and
attention functioning
Jones, Brown, &
Aber (2011); Jones,
Brown, Hoglund, &
Aber (2010)
Resolving Conflict
Creatively (basis
of 4 Rs program)
Violence
Prevention
6-11
USA
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Low aggression
Increased social-emotional
competencies, decreased
aggression
Aber, Brown, &
Jones (2003); Aber,
Jones, Brown,
Chaudry, &
Samples (1998)
Social-Emotional
Learning
(unnamed program)
Social-
Emotional
Learning
6-11
Portugal
Control
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
Confidence
Improved self-control,
emotional differentiation,
social skills, and self-esteem
Moreira et al.
(2010)
46
-Self-esteem
The RULER
Approach
Social-
Emotional
Learning
integrated
with
academics
6-11
USA
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Emotional
understanding and
expression
Improved student warmth and
connectedness, improved
autonomy and leadership
Rivers et al. (2012)
Facing History
and Ourselves
Social
Emotional
Learning
integrated
with
academics
6-11; 12-
18
Global--N.
Ireland, Israel,
China, US, S.
Africa
Ethics
-Character
-Values
-Ethics
Several evaluations have
shown increases in critical
thinking skills, ethics, and
civic values for participants,
particularly adolescents
Selman et al.
(2007)
Character
Education
Programs (e.g.,
Character Counts,
Positive Action)
Social-
Emotional
Learning
integrated
with
academics
6-11; 12-
18
USA
Ethics
-Character
-Values
-Ethics
Across multiple programs,
some evidence of impact on
values and ethics, particularly
for elementary school aged
children.
Berkowitz & Bier
(2004).
Penn Optimism
Program
Depression
Prevention
6-11
China
Problem-solving
Resilience
-Coping skills
-Optimism
Initiative
-Assertiveness
Fewer depressive symptoms
Yu & Seligman
(2002)
Penn Resiliency
Program
Depression
Prevention
6-11, 12-
17
(10-12)
USA
Problem-solving
Resilience
-Coping skills
-Optimism
Initiative
-Assertiveness
Fewer depressive symptoms,
which is focus of PRP,
although program also targets
social skills, problem-solving,
and cognitive style
Brunwasser,
Gillham, & Kim
(2009; meta-
analysis)
FRIENDS
Program
Depression
and Anxiety
Prevention
6-11, 12-
17
Australia (a
pilot study
was also
conducted in
Resilience
-Coping skills
-Optimism
Confidence
Decreased anxiety and
increased future orientation in
short-term
Barrett,
Sonderegger, &
Sonderegger
(2001); Barrett,
47
Yugoslavia)
-Self-esteem
Farrell, Ollendick,
& Dadds (2006);
Lock & Barrett
(2003)
Life Skills
Training
Drug Use
Prevention
6-11, 12-
17
(10-12)
USA
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making (also
refusal skills)
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Initiative
-Assertiveness
Decreased drug use, increased
knowledge of interpersonal
and communication skills;
decreased aggression, fighting,
and delinquency
Botvin & Griffin
(2004; review
paper); Griffin,
Botvin, Nichols, &
Doyle (2003)
Lions Quest
ProgramSkills
for Adolescence
Drug Use
Prevention
6-11, 12-
17
(10-12)
USA
Problem-Solving
-Decision-making
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Initiative
-Agency
Decreased drug use; increased
self-efficacy for drug refusal
skills
Eisen, Zellman, &
Murray (2003)
Young Citizens
Program
AIDS/HIV
Prevention
6-11, 12-
17
Tanzania
Teamwork
-Communication skills
-Emotion regulation
Initiative
-Agency
Increased deliberative and
communicative efficacy,
emotional control, and child
collective efficacy
Carlson, Brennan,
& Earls (2012)
Urban Improv
Arts (Theater)
Recreational
Activities
6-11
USA
Problem-Solving
-Conflict resolution
-Decision making
Control
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Decreased teacher-rated
hyperactivity and internalizing
problems; increased prosocial
behavior.
Kisiel et al. (2006)
Music-Based
Interventions and
Youth Orchestras
Arts
6-11, 12-
17
USA; Vienna;
Australia;
Peru;
Venezuela,
RB
Control
-Emotional expression
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Meta-analysis and one quasi-
experimental study have
shown that music interventions
can be beneficial for
improving symptoms and
quality of life.
Gold, Wigram, &
Voracek (2005)
Meta-analysis:
Gold, Voracek, &
Wigram (2004)
48
New Jersey After
3 (out-of-school
activities)
Recreational
Activities
6-11
USA
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Prosocial behavior
Increased social and
interpersonal skills (rule
following, cooperation, etc.);
increased civic engagement
(community activities)
Eagle et al. (2009)
LA’s BEST (out-
of-school/after-
school activities)
Recreational
Activities
6-11
USA
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery
-Sense of purpose
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Prosocial behavior
-Low aggression
Initiative
-Assertiveness
Higher reading and math
scores compared to control
group; reduced school drop-
out
Goldschmidt &
Huang (2007)
4-H Program (out-
of-school 4-H
activities)
Recreational
Activities
6-11, 12-
17
USA
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Prosocial behavior
Increased developmental
assets; increased community
contributions; reduced
likelihood to engage in risk
behaviors (drug use; sexual
activities)
Lerner & Lerner
(2009; summary)
Sport and Play for
Traumatized
Children and
Youth
Recreational
Activities
6-11, 12-
17
Iran
Resilience
-Coping skills
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Prosocial behavior
Children reported increased
trust with sport coaches;
antisocial behavior decreased
over the course of the
program; children were
observed to become more
cooperative
Kunz (2006)
Sport and Play
Program for
Afghan Refugee
and Pakistani
Children/Youth
Recreational
Activities
6-11, 12-
17, 18-29
Afghanistan,
Pakistan
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
-Prosocial behavior
Increased self-regulation,
confidence, conflict resolution,
and communication skills;
increased attendance
Right to Play
(2010)
49
Problem Solving
for Life
Depression
Prevention
12-17
Australia
Problem-solving
-Decision-making
-Interpersonal problem-
solving
Resilience
-Coping skills
-High-risk participants showed
significantly decreased
depressive symptoms and
increased problem-solving
scores; low-risk decreased in
depression
Spence, Sheffield,
& Donovan (2003)
Aggression
Replacement
Training
Violence
Prevention
12-17
USA
Problem-solving
-Decision-making
Control
Ethics
-Moral reasoning
Several efficacy trials show
improved self-control and
competencies, although
findings are limited for
aggression
Reddy & Goldstein
(2001; review
paper)
Youth
Empowerment
Solutions (YES)
for Peaceful
Communities
Violence
Prevention
12-17
USA
Teamwork
-Leadership skills
-Communication
-Prosocial behavior
Ethics
-Moral reasoning
Pilot study results: Participants
less likely to be victims of
neighborhood crime; improved
group leadership and conflict
resolution skills.
Reischl et al.
(2011)
Youth Theater for
Peace
Arts and
Recreational
Activities
12-17
Kyrgyzstan
and Tajikistan
Problem-solving
-Conflict resolution
Teamwork
-Leadership skills
-Communication
-Prosocial behavior
Improved conflict resolution;
increased sense of agency
(ability to impact conflict in
one’s community); increased
communication skills
Nigmatov (2011)
Drama Approach
to Aids Education:
DramAide
Intervention
Arts and
Recreational
Activities,
integrated
with
HIV/AIDS
Prevention
12-17
South Africa
Problem-solving
-Decision-making (safe
sex practices)
Teamwork
-Prosocial behavior
Improved knowledge and
attitudes about HIV/AIDS;
increased sexual safety
Harvey, Stuart, &
Swan (2000)
Physical Activity
Intervention
(unnamed program)
Recreational
Activities
12-17
Chile
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Targets of change were
physical activity, teamwork
and self-esteem; found some
impacts on physical fitness and
mental health
Bonhauser et al.
(2005)
50
The Ishraq
“Enlightenment”
Program
Positive Youth
Development,
integrated
with
Academics
12-17
Egypt
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
-Sense of purpose
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Increased self-confidence and
civic engagement; improved
literacy; also increased “safe
spaces” and practices for girls;
girls reported wanting to marry
at an older age
Brady et al. (2007)
Adolescent
Development
Program
Positive Youth
Development
12-17
Trinidad and
Tobago
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Increased self-esteem, self-
awareness, and confidence;
increased communication
skills
Griffith (2002)
Kingston YMCA
Youth
Development
Programme
Positive Youth
Development
12-17
Jamaica
Teamwork
-Social/life skills
Initiative
- Agency
Increased self-esteem, moral
beliefs, and decision making,
decreased aggression
propensity
Guerra et al. (2010)
YouthBuild
Positive Youth
Development
12-17, 18-
29
Guatemala, El
Salvador,
Honduras,
Nicaragua
Teamwork
-Communication skills
Initiative
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Increased social-emotional
competencies (i.e., self-
esteem) and life skills;
decreased rates of delinquency
International Youth
Foundation,
Youthbuild
International, &
Catholic Relief
Services (2010)
Palestinian Youth
Empowerment
(RUWWAD)
Positive Youth
Development
12-17, 18-
29, 30+
Palestine
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
Increased program
infrastructure and involvement
Hyatt & Auten
(2011)
Community Youth
Peace Education
Program
Positive Youth
Development
18-29,
30+
Liberia
Problem-solving
-Decision-making
-Conflict resolution
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
More likely to settle conflicts
in a non-violent manner; safer
sex practices
Yeager Sallah
(2006)
Job Corps
Vocational
Training
12-17; 18-
29
USA
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
Increased educational
attainment, earnings (for
several post-program years;
gains not sustained except for
Schochet,
Burghardt, &
McConnell (2008)
51
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
oldest participants); decreased
criminal activity
Empowerment
and Livelihood for
Adolescents
Program (focuses
on girls only in
this evaluation)
Vocational
Training
12-17; 18-
29 (18-
year-olds
allowed to
participate
)
Uganda
Problem-solving
-Decision-making
(health risk-taking
choices)
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
32% increased likelihood that
girls will engage in income
generating activities (self-
employment increases);
increased condom usage;
decreased child-bearing and
unwanted sexual interactions
Bandiera et al.
(2012)
Juventud y
Empleo (Youth
and Employment)
Program
Vocational
Training
12-17; 18-
29
Dominican
Republic
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
Teamwork
-Relationship skills
-Communication skills
Confidence
-Self-esteem
Increased youth future
expectations, increased
earning rates and job quality
for males; decreased teen
pregnancy; increased social
and personal competencies
(combined measure of
leadership, self-esteem,
empathy, communication)
Ibarrarán, Ripani,
Taboada, Villa, &
Garcia (2012)
Card, Ibarrarán,
Regalia, Rosas-
Shady, & Soares
(2011)
PROJoven
Vocational
Training
12-17; 18-
29
(targeted
ages are
16-24)
Peru
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
Increased paid jobs, monthly
earnings, and formal
employment probabilities,
especially for females and 16-
20 year olds
Díaz & Jaramillo
(2006)
PROBECAT/
SICAT
Vocational
Training
Mexico
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
Increased formal job
employment, although
increases were inconsistent
Delajara, Freije, &
Soloaga (2006)
Jóvenes en Acción
(Youth in Action)
Vocational
Training
18-29
Colombia
Achievement
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
Increased wages/salaried
earnings, increased probability
of paid employment; increased
formal sector jobs
Attanasio, Kugler,
& Meghir(2009)
Training and
Vocational
18-29
Jordan
Achievement
Giving girls a voucher
Groh, Krishnan,
52
Wage Subsidy
Program
Training
Motivation
-Mastery orientation
(job skills)
increased employment in
short-term only
McKenzie, &
Vishwanath (2012)
Deliberate
Psychological
Education
Moral
Education
18-29,
30+
USA
Ethics
-Moral Reasoning
Increased “principled”
reasoning; qualitative findings
also support increased ethical
decision-making
Schmidt,
McAdams, &
Foster (2009)
Summer Service
Learning
Programs
Service
Learning
18-29,
30+
USA
Ethics
-Moral Reasoning
Increased broad moral
reasoning
Lies, Bock,
Brandenberger, &
Trozzolo (2012)
Stepping Stones
Program
HIV/AIDS
Prevention
12-17; 18-
29
South Africa
Teamwork
-Communication skills
33% reduction in herpes;
decreased risk behavior in
males only.
Jewkes, Nduna,
Levin, Jama,
Dunkle, Puren, &
Duvvury (2008)
Save the Children
Malawi COPE
(Community-
based Options for
Protection and
Empowerment)
Program
Community-
wide
HIV/AIDS
Prevention
**Ages
not
listed
targets
children,
families,
and
communiti
es
Malawi
Teamwork
-Communication and
relationship skills
Ethics
Increased community
cohesion, awareness of
HIV/AIDS, engagement in
community participation
Hunter (2002)
53
... The focus of education systems needs to be broadened beyond intelligence as an education input and beyond cognitive skills as an education outcome. Socio-emotional skills are known to be of increasing importance in the world of work (Heckman and Kautz 2012), Guerra et al 2014). Fortunately, research and policy are advancing in these areas (King and Gunewardena 2022). ...
... A subset of social-emotional skills (known as the PRACTICE skills) is of vital importance for the labor market. The skills that are of value to employers have been classified into eight groups of skills, summarized in the acronym PRACTICE (Guerra et al 2014). These eight skills, identified within the PRACTICE framework, are: Problem-solving, Resilience, Achievement Motivations, Control, Teamwork, Initiative, Confidence and Ethics. ...
... However, the evidence from research suggests that middle-childhood is the best time to invest in the development of PRACTICE skills (Durlak et al 2011). Studies provide evidence that there are key markers of neurobiological and psychosocial readiness, for the development of socio-emotional skills, at different stages of childhood and early adulthood (Guerra et al 2014). Accordingly, PRACTICE skills developed at various stages of a person's life, from early-childhood through adulthood. ...
... This change in attitude can be attributed to multiple causes. Firstly, there is increasing awareness globally of the important role played by socio-emotional skills for labor market performance, especially employment (Heckman and Kautz 2012;Guerra et al 2014). Secondly, citizens and voters, including academics and researchers, have become more perceptive and sophisticated in their understanding of 'free higher education', as tax payers finance state universities, so that societies are then entitled to a return on this investment of tax money through the generation of human capital that contributes to economic development. ...
Chapter
Full-text available
The Chapter analyses the evolution of the Sri Lankan Education System over a seventy five year period from 1947 to 2022. The analysis covers both General Education and Higher Education. The topics discussed include access and participation in general education and higher education, the quality of general education. the governance of the education system, the labor market relevance of higher education, and the promotion of research and innovation and the commercialization of innovations in the higher education sector. The chapter highlights landmark achievements over the 75 year period. In addition, the chapter discusses current challenges faced by the education sector, as well as opportunities for future development.
Article
Full-text available
The research is an attempt to find out the relationship between teachers' socio-emotional skills and students’ performance at the postgraduate level. The objectives of the study were to identify the socio-emotional skills of teachers and to measure the relationship between the socio-emotional skills of teachers and the construct of students’ performance at the postgraduate level. The study was quantitative and descriptive in nature. The correlational survey design was adopted. Three public sector universities of district Faisalabad, such as UE Faisalabad, GCUF, and GCWUF, were the accessible population of the study. By using a convenient sampling technique, a total sample of 357 BS program students (211 female and 146 male) were selected from different departments of the three public sector universities. A structured and self-developed questionnaire was used to collect the data from the BS program students. The expert opinion and Cronbach’s Alpha value techniques were used to assess the questionnaire’s validity and reliability. All of the questionnaire statements were close-ended, and the respondents’ perceptions were gauged using a five-point Likert scale. The collected data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 22). The results showed that self-awareness, social awareness and relationship management were at higher levels in teachers than self-management and responsible decision-making.
Article
El presente estudio tuvo como objetivo principal determinar si el Taller de Cuentos mejora las habilidades socioemocionales en estudiantes de 5 años en una institución educativa de inicial Cusco 2023. La metodología utilizada tuvo un tipo aplicado, enfoque cuantitativo, método deductivo, diseño cuasi experimental y un paradigma positivista, la muestra de estudio estuvo compuesta por 30 estudiante que son Niños y Niñas de 5 años a quienes se les aplico un pre test y post test mediante una ficha de evaluación. Se llego a la conclusión que el Taller de Cuentos no mejora significativamente las habilidades socioemocionales en estudiantes de 5 años en una institución educativa de inicial Cusco 2023, esto según el puntaje promedio antes del taller de cuentos fue de 162.3 ± 36.920, después del taller de cuentos el puntaje promedio fue de 173.400 ± 16.572, observado un ligero incremento en el puntaje, asimismo la prueba t de student de medias para muestras relacionadas (pareadas), donde sig. = 0.112 > 0.05 se acepta Ho.
Article
Full-text available
As preocupações e compreensões sobre a temática das competências socioemocionais relacionada aos alunos do Curso Técnico em Administração foi desenhada a partir das apresentações durante o evento da Tecnobento pelos docentes da E.E.E.M. Bento Gonçalves – Canoas - RS. Assim, esse estudo tem como objetivo mostrar e refletir, trazendo contribuições no sentido de priorizar ações de melhoramentos em benefícios dos estudantes durante a sua formação técnica, sob reflexões e estratégias do professor como agente transformador. Para isto, adotou-se a metodologia desenvolvida por meio da busca na legislação, na doutrina, nas Políticas Públicas da educação, nos dados em sites relacionados à BNCC, nas Lei de Diretrizes e Bases e nos dados relacionados à Tecnobento. No primeiro momento, procura-se entender como as competências socioemocionais são alinhadas com o mercado de trabalho. Num segundo momento, busca-se avaliar os impactos positivos da BNCC, observando e compreendendo a dinâmica relacionada à Tecnobento. A pesquisa, não apenas visa contribuir com a necessidade de acompanhamento e melhoramento nas relações identificadas a partir das competências socioemocionais, mas também inserir dentro do cenário, identificado pelos professores, uma reformulação na forma de apresentação e exposição dos projetos a partir da visão do educador e da conexão com o mercado de trabalho.
Article
Full-text available
Personality traits and social, emotional, and behavioral (SEB) skills share the same behavioral referents, but whereas traits refer to a person’s typical or average performance, skills refer to their capacity or maximal performance. Given their shared behavioral foundations, an important question to address is whether personality traits and SEB skills independently predict important outcomes. In this study (N = 642), we examined whether subscales of the Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Skills Inventory (BESSI), a measure of SEB skills, provided incremental validity in the prediction of the ACT composite score, an important academic outcome for American adolescents, over the Big Five personality traits. Consistent with our expectations, on average, SEB skills showed stronger associations with ACT achievement scores than personality traits. Moreover, SEB skills added incremental validity over and above personality traits in predicting ACT achievement scores. The findings reinforce the importance of conceptually distinguishing and measuring traits and skills.
Article
Introduction: Life skills education is needed for adolescents to achieve independence as a foundation for becoming adults in facing real life. Support from various education sectors is needed in life skills guidance programs to anticipate adolescent problems, one of which is mosque-based life skills education. Objectives: This study aims to conduct field studies and analyze mosque guidance programs for adolescents, especially related to life skills material. Data collection was carried out on the mosque adolescent development program implemented, problems faced in the field, and explored the needs of mosques about youth development programs. Methods: This type of research is field research, using a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The study was conducted on 5 (five) mosque adolescent organization as research objects, namely Remaja Masjid Sunda Kelapa Mosque Youth (RISKA) Jakarta, YISC Al Azhar Jakarta, Remaja Masjid Bintaro Jaya (Remisya)Tangerang Selatan, Sobat An Nashr (Sonar)Tangerang Selatan, and Remaja Masjid Jogokariyan Yogyakarta. Results: Based on the results of the analysis of existing mosque adolescent guidance programs, there has not been found comprehensive and structured life skills material, the content of life skills that have been carried out in mosques in the form of direct organizational practice and social activities. So it is necessary to develop existing mosque adolescent programs, by including life skills materials that are more structured and comprehensive.
Chapter
Bringing lessons from behavioral science to support the goals of eliminating poverty and increasing shared prosperity around the world is the task of the Mind, Behavior and Development Unit (eMBeD). The chapter summarizes lessons from the process of setting up a behavioral science unit in a large institution like the World Bank and how to adopt and adapt behavioral science to work with governments, organizations, and partners to improve poverty-reduction development policies at scale. From a start that capitalized on quick gains to build momentum and buy-in to more complex and wide-reaching anti-poverty interventions, the process has been one of constant trade-offs. From how to staff, fund, and operate a successful unit, the chapter describes how eMBeD successfully increased demand for its support by offering its clients a results-driven and pragmatic set of research products, from intervention design to implementation and evaluation, and capacity-building. Moreover, the chapter shows how eMBeD tests iteratively, learns, and adapts its procedures and structure to evolve alongside its changing context to adapt to new challenges.
Article
Based on an overview of domestic and foreign research related to the research field of the topic; the research of the topic has determined the urgency of the topic, research objectives, research objects and scope, research hypotheses, research tasks, and methods. The research on the topic has systematized the theoretical basis for the concept and manifestation of social-emotional skills in student learning: generalizing the picture of the current situation of recognizing the importance of social-emotional skills in student learning, the level of assessment of the manifestation and educational measures of social-emotional skills in learning, and finding out the factors that affect social emotions in student learning such as from the external environment, at school, family and external social relationships. Factors from the internal environment are the self-awareness of each student. From the current situation of the problem, the study has proposed educational measures for 504 students from 8 schools and colleges in Can Tho University (CTU), Vietnam. Some measures were to educate social-emotional skills for students through soft skills topics, teach soft skills to students through extracurricular activities, and soft skills education for students through integrated teaching. Article visualizations: </p
Article
Full-text available
This study investigated the effect of the Social Decision-Making Skills Curriculum (SDSC) on the emotional intelligence and the prosocial behaviors of primary students in Grades 1-3, in a private school in Lebanon. Students were trained in social problem-solving and social decision-making skills through the implementation of the SDSC. Participants were 80 students (29 students, experimental group; 51 controls). The SDSC was implemented in classrooms to students in the experimental group. A rating scale from this curriculum was used to determine the students' profile in social decision-making and social-problem-solving skills. Subjects' 'emotional intelligence' was assessed using the Bar-On Emotional Inventory: Youth Version. Following nine weeks of training in the SDSC, ANCOVA results showed that there were significant differences in the emotional intelligence and prosocial skills of children in the experimental group, as compared to those in the control group. Results are discussed and implications and future recommendations presented
Article
This paper presents the results of an independent two-year evaluation of the I Can Problem Solve (ICPS) universal prevention program, implemented in kindergarten and first grade classrooms in a racially and ethnically diverse urban school district. Matched pairs of schools were assigned to Instruction (i.e., treatment) or Control status. Teachers assessed students' behaviors at pre and post implementation using two different rating scales. Overall, we found support for the effectiveness of ICPS in increasing prosocial behaviors and in reducing aggressive behaviors. The mean change scores of both scales showed a significant additive effect, with children (n = 96) receiving two years of ICPS instruction showing greater improvement than both children receiving one year of ICPS instruction (n = 106) as well as the two-year Control students (n = 24). The authors were selected by the school district to evaluate ICPS, and are not affiliated with the program.
Book
During middle childhood, the period between ages 5 and 12, children gain the basic tools, skills and motivations to become productive members of their society. Failure to acquire these basic tools can lead to long-term consequences for children's future education, work, and family life. In this book the editors assemble contributions from 15 longitudinal studies representing diverse groups in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom to learn what developmental patterns and experiences in middle childhood contexts forecast the directions children take when they reach adolescence and adulthood. The editors conclude that, although lasting individual differences are evident by the end of the preschool years, a child's developmental path in middle childhood contributes significantly to the adolescent and adult that he or she becomes. Families, peers, and the broader social and economic environment all make a difference for young people's future education, work, and relationships with others. © Cambridge University Press 2006 and Cambridge University Press 2009.
Article
This article establishes that a low-dimensional vector of cognitive and noncognitive skills explains a variety of labor market and behavioral outcomes. Our analysis addresses the problems of measurement error, imperfect proxies, and reverse causality that plague conventional studies. Noncognitive skills strongly influence schooling decisions and also affect wages, given schooling decisions. Schooling, employment, work experience, and choice of occupation are affected by latent noncognitive and cognitive skills. We show that the same low-dimensional vector of abilities that explains schooling choices, wages, employment, work experience, and choice of occupation explains a wide variety of risky behaviors.
Article
A Young Mind in a Growing Brain summarizes some initial conclusions that follow simultaneous examination of the psychological milestones of human development during its first decade and what has been learned about brain growth. This volume proposes that development is the process of experience working on a brain that is undergoing significant biological maturation. Experience counts, but only when the brain has developed to the point of being able to process, encode, and interact with these new environmental experiences. This book's aim is to acquaint developmental biologists and neuroscientists with what has been learned about human psychological development and to acquaint developmental psychologists with the biological evidence. The hope is that each group will gain a richer appreciation of both knowledge corpora. The authors hope to appeal to neuroscientists, psychologists, psychiatrists, pediatricians, and their students. The idea for this book was born in 1993 when the authors--a leading developmental psychologist and a pediatrician--met for the first time and recognized the complementarity of their backgrounds and the utility of a collaboration. The reception of their first two papers motivated this attempt to synthesize the available information over a longer developmental era. Learning a great deal over the past decade, the authors hope that their enthusiasm provokes an equally intense curiosity in readers. © 2005 by Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. All rights reserved.
Article
Educating business students for ethical professional practice is a growing concern for both the corporate world and business education. Highly publicised scandals have pushed public trust in business to an all‐time low, resulting in losses of customers and high employee turnover. Corporate and business education leaders have begun to press for more effective models for promoting ethical development in business education. This study examined the effectiveness of one such model, Deliberate Psychological Education (DPE), in promoting greater cognitive moral reasoning in undergraduate business students. Its significant, positive findings hold promise for the promotion of more ethical business professionals through preparatory classroom intervention.