This chapter focuses on the Woolf Reforms and their effects on civil litigation process. It also argues that Lord Woolf based his proposals on very little empirical evidence, and overlooked other evidence that was available to him. In terms of Lord Woolf's aims - the reduction of cost, delay, complexity, and excessive adversarialism - there is little evidence of success. Instead there is
... [Show full abstract] significant evidence that, with the possible exception of the culture of adversarialism, the situation has got worse.