ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of graduated compression sleeves on muscle performance during high-intensity exercise. Twenty-four resistance trained men were randomly assigned to one of two groups: compression sleeve (GCS, n=11) or placebo sleeve (GPS, n=13). Participants performed 4 sets of 10 unilateral maximal eccentric/concentric elbow flexion repetitions on an isokinetic dynamometer at 120°s⁻¹ with 1 min of inter-set rest. Average torque, work and power were measured during concentric and eccentric actions. ANOVA revealed no significant interactions or main effects for group for any variable. However, values decreased significantly across sets for average torque (1st = 46.55 ± 11.11 Nm to 4th = 36.75 ± 8.78 Nm), average work (1st = 78.83 ± 18.49 J to 4th = 53.26 ± 10.04 J) and average power (1st = 52.3 ± 12.03 W to 4th = 32.59 ± 8.82 W). Therefore, the use of a graduated compression sleeve appears not enhance isokinetic elbow flexion muscle performance.
Content may be subject to copyright.
The Effects of Graduated Compression
Sleeves on Muscle Performance: A
Randomised Controlled Trial
Maria C. Pereira1, Martim Bottaro1, Lee E. Brown2,
Valdinar A. Rocha-Junior1, Saulo S. Martorelli1,
Murillo Neumann1, Jake Carmo1
1University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil,
E-mail: mariaclaudiacarpe@yahoo.com.br
2California State University, Fullerton, California, USA.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of graduated
compression sleeves on muscle performance during high-intensity
exercise. Twenty-four resistance trained men were randomly assigned to
one of two groups: compression sleeve (GCS, n=11) or placebo sleeve
(GPS, n=13). Participants performed 4 sets of 10 unilateral maximal
eccentric/concentric elbow flexion repetitions on an isokinetic
dynamometer at 120°s-1 with 1 min of inter-set rest. Average torque, work
and power were measured during concentric and eccentric actions.
ANOVA revealed no significant interactions or main effects for group for any
variable. However, values decreased significantly across sets for average
torque (1st = 46.55 ± 11.11 Nm to 4th = 36.75 ± 8.78 Nm), average work (1st =
78.83 ± 18.49 J to 4th = 53.26 ± 10.04 J) and average power (1st = 52.3 ±
12.03 W to 4th = 32.59 ± 8.82 W). Therefore, the use of a graduated
compression sleeve appears not enhance isokinetic elbow flexion muscle
performance.
Key words: Compression Garments, Eccentric Muscle Action, Isokinetic
Exercise, Resistance Training
INTRODUCTION
Recently, compression garments have become popular among athletes as an ergogenic aid
that may enhance performance during competition and training. Current compression
garments range from whole body to isolated limb sleeves (e.g., tights, shorts, socks, sleeves
etc.). There is also a new graduated compression garment that provides varying degrees of
compression across a body segment. Typically, the graduate compression is greatest at the
distal end and decreases gradually to the proximal end of the isolated limb [1-2] .
Studies reported that compression garments may activate mechanoreceptors in superficial
tissue, enhance sensory feedback and improve proprioception [3-6]. These mechanisms
might enhance muscle performance. Several studies have demonstrated that lower-body
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 9 · Number 5 · 2014 985
Reviewer: Andrew Fry (University of Kansas, USA)
compression garments provide physiological and performance benefits during multi-joint
exercises [2-5, 7-9]. Initial studies demonstrated that compression shorts increased vertical
jump performance by enhancing force and power production across repeated jumps [3-4]
possibly mediated by a reduction in muscle oscillation and enhancement of joint position
sense [4-5]. Most prior studies have primarily investigated the effects of compression
garments during lower-body continuous exercise [2, 5, 9-15], and several studies have
reported physiological and performance benefits [9, 13, 16-17]. Recently, upper-body
compression garments have become popular, albeit with little substantiating scientific
evidence.
Studies evaluated the effects of compression garments on upper-body recovery after
exercise [18-20] and their results indicated that the compression garments improved
recovery. However, to the best of our knowledge only two studies [17, 21] investigated the
effects of compression garments on upper-body performance during exercise. Dascombe et
al. [17] demonstrated no significant improvements in power output during continuous
simulated flat-water kayaking while wearing upper-body compression garments (full-length
long-sleeved tops). Moreover, Duffield and Portus [21] compared the effects of three types
of whole-body compression garments on performance and recovery in cricket players with
no benefits noted for repeat-sprint or throwing performance.
Although most previous studies have examined compression garments during lower-body
continuous exercise, there is a paucity of research related to the effects of upper-body
compression garments on intermittent high-intensity exercise. Furthermore, since
compression garments appear to improve muscle recovery, we hypothesized that upper-body
compression garment may enhance muscular performance during isokinetic intermittent
exercise. In addition, compression sleeves have become popular as an attempt to improve
performance during intermittent, high-intensity sports such as volleyball, baseball, softball,
basketball and track and field. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects
of graduated compression sleeves on muscle performance during isokinetic intermittent
high-intensity exercise.
METHOD
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE PROBLEM
A between-subjects randomised controlled trial design was used to examine the effects of
graduated compression sleeves on muscle performance via intermittent exercise. We used
this design because it is the most rigorous way of determining whether a cause-effect relation
exists between treatment and outcome [22]. Participants were randomly allocated to one of
two groups: graduated compression sleeve or placebo sleeve. They performed 4 sets of 10
maximal elbow flexions on an isokinetic dynamometer with their dominant arm. One minute
rest was given between sets and the sleeve was worn during the entire test.
SUBJECTS
Twenty-four resistance trained men (age: 24.1 ± 5.2 years; body mass: 78.6 ± 9.7 kg; height:
175.9 ± 6.2 cm) voluntarily participated. They had at least six months of experience
resistance training, a minimum of three times per week. All subjects completed a health
screening questionnaire prior to participation, were properly informed of all procedures,
purposes, benefits and risks, then signed a institutional ethics committee written informed
consent form. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups: graduated compression
sleeve (GCS, n= 11) or placebo sleeve (GPS, n= 13). Arm circumference was used to select
the size of the sleeve (Skins, Sydney, New South, Australia) in accordance with
986 The Effects of Graduated Compression Sleeves on Muscle Performance
manufacturer’s instructions (each product has a specific size chart and size calculator). The
placebo sleeve was visually similar to the graduated compression sleeve but without the
capacity for compression.
PROCEDURES
Participants completed an elbow flexion exercise protocol with their dominant arm. Exercise
was performed on an isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex System 3, Biodex Medical, Inc.,
Shirley, NY) at 120°s-1 which was calibrated prior to each testing session according to the
manufacturer’s specifications. Subjects were seated on a Scott Bench (preacher curl bench,
Gervasport, São Paulo, Brazil) with their elbow aligned with the axis of rotation of the
dynamometer (Figure 1). Range of motion was 0° to 130° of elbow flexion (0° at full
extension) [23]. Their forearm remained in a supinated position throughout the test. The
protocol consisted of 4 sets of 10 maximal eccentric/concentric actions. A one minute rest
interval was given between sets and verbal encouragement was given throughout the exercise
by the same investigator. Average torque, average work and average power during concentric
and eccentric actions were measured. The Biodex has previously been shown to be a reliable
(ICC= 0.86 to 0.98) and valid tool for the measurement of torque, work and power [24].
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 9 · Number 5 · 2014 987
Figure 1. Scott Bench (preacher curl bench) adapted to the Isokinetic
Dynamometer
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
Data are reported as mean ± standard deviation. Separate 2 x 4 (group x set) mixed factor
ANOVAs were used to determine significant differences across sets for average torque,
average work and average power for both concentric and eccentric actions. Fisher least
significant difference (LSD) was used as a post hoc test for pairwise differences. Partial Eta
squared was calculated as a measure of effect size (ES) for each variable. Statistical
significance was set a priori at P < 0.05. All statistical procedures were performed using the
statistical software package SPSS 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
RESULTS
There were no significant group differences for age or anthropometric measures prior to
testing. There were also no significant interactions or main effects for group for any variable.
For concentric average torque, there was a significant F (1.60, 35.17) = 34.42, r = 0.61
main effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd > 4th)
(Figure 2 A). For eccentric average torque, there was a significant F (2.15, 47.29) = 227.60,
r = 0.91 main effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd
> 4th) (Figure 2 A).
For concentric average work, there was a significant F (1.66, 36.62) = 52.16, r = 0.70
main effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd & 4th)
(Figure 2 B). For eccentric average work, there was a significant F (1.98, 43.55) = 180.45, r
= 0.89 main effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd >
4th) (Figure 2 B).
For concentric average power, there was a significant F (1.32, 22.98) = 47.47, r = .79 main
effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd > 4th) (Figure
2 C). For eccentric average power, there was a significant F (1.58, 34.66) = 179.60, r = .89
main effect for time with values decreasing significantly across sets (1st > 2nd > 3rd > 4th)
(Figure 2 C).
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of graduated compression sleeves on
muscle performance during intermittent high-intensity elbow flexion exercise. Our results
showed that average torque, work and power decreased significantly over the course of four
sets demonstrating a normal muscle fatiguing slope. However, the graduated compression
sleeves did not enhance isokinetic performance during concentric or eccentric actions.
A review by Born et al. [6] concluded that although there are beneficial effects of
compression garments on performance, they seem to be more pronounced when used for
recovery purposes, 12-48 hours after induced-muscle damage. Most prior studies of
compression garments on performance have only examined their effects on the lower-body,
making direct comparisons to our results difficult. Faulkner et al. [10] investigated the effects
of a variety of lower-limb compression garments on 400-m sprint performance and found no
significant differences when compared to a control condition. Many other studies have also
not found significant lower-body performance differences while wearing compression
garments [2, 7-8, 12, 17, 25-27]. In contrast, Kraemer et al. [3] demonstrated that
compression shorts resulted in maintenance of power in volleyball players during 10
consecutive maximal countermovement jumps but did not improve single maximal jump
power. Similarly, compression shorts significantly enhanced mean force and power before
and after different fatigue tasks, although without an increase in maximal power of the
highest jump [4]. Moreover, compression shorts reduced muscle oscillation upon impact and
988 The Effects of Graduated Compression Sleeves on Muscle Performance
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 9 · Number 5 · 2014 989
Figure 2. Changes in average torque (A), average work (B) and average
power (C) of concentric and eccentric actions by group and set.
*significantly less than set 1. + significantly less than set 2. x significantly less
than set 3
improved position sense while enhancing proprioception. Improvements in position sense
and proprioception may have enhanced performance under conditions of fatigue [4]. Doan et
al. [5] evaluated compression shorts vs. loose-fitting gym shorts in university track athletes
and found that countermovement vertical jump height increased, and participants hip flexion
angle during a 60m sprint was reduced when they wore compression shorts. Additionally,
wearing compression shorts resulted in attenuated impact forces and a reduction in muscle
oscillation when landing from a jump [5].
We found only one study [17] that investigated the effects of upper-body compression
garments on upper-body performance. Dascombe et al. [17] examined the effects of wearing
upper-body compression garment on performance during simulated flat-water kayaking.
Five male and two female elite flat-water kayakers completed a six-step incremental test
followed by a four-minute maximal performance test. Participants performed two exercise
conditions: 1) full-length compression long-sleeved tops, and 2) no shirt or sports training
bra. Performance measures such as power, distance covered, and stroke rate were recorded
during the tests. No significant differences between the upper-body compression garment
and control conditions were evident for any performance variable. They reported that the null
effect may be due to low compression provided by the compression garment at the agonist
muscles used for kayaking, which are located on the torso of the body (i.e., rotator cuff,
serratus anterior, rhomboid major and latissimus dorsi). Although Dascomb et al. [17] have
investigated the effects of upper-body compression garments on performance during
continuous exercise, our data are in agreement with their results.
Furthermore, Duffield and Portus [21] submitted 10 male cricket players to four
randomised exercise sessions (three types of full-body compression garments and a control).
Each session consisted of a 20 m sprint every minute, separated by 45 s of submaximal
exercise. All compression garments were worn during the entire testing session and 24 h after
exercise. Participants performed a maximal distance throwing test of five maximal cricket
ball throws, before and after the exercise session. Performance on the accuracy throwing was
measured by throws at a custom designed target at 10, 20 and 30 min of the exercise session.
They found no significant differences in repeat-sprint performance, throwing distance or
accuracy between conditions. Although other researchers have investigated the effects of a
lower-body exercise protocol on sports-specific upper-body performance, our results are in
agreement with their findings. Furthermore, it has been suggested that compression garments
may interact with receptors present in skin, muscle, ligaments and joint capsules barrack [28-
29] that enhance sensory feedback, resulting in improved proprioception. Therefore, the lack
of performance enhancement in the present study may be related to exercise mode. During
the isokinetic high-intensity elbow flexion exercise in the present study, the limb is stable and
subjected to low impact forces. In addition, the dynamometer maintains the movement
pattern throughout the range of motion and may reduce proprioceptive mechanism
requirements [30].
CONCLUSION
We found no muscle performance improvements with compression sleeves during
intermittent high-intensity isokinetic elbow flexion exercise. Average torque, work and
power decreased significantly over the course of four sets and showed a normal fatiguing
pattern, but eccentric and concentric values were not significantly different across sets
between placebo and compression sleeves. Although graduated compression sleeves did not
enhance muscle performance during intermittent high-intensity isokinetic exercise they also
did not hinder it. Therefore, coaches and athletes may use graduated compression sleeves at
990 The Effects of Graduated Compression Sleeves on Muscle Performance
their preference for other purposes, such as improving recovery or prevention of muscle
damage. Future studies should attempt to verify the effects of graduated compression sleeves
on performance during other types of exercise and in different populations.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This study was partially supported by the Brazilian Council for the Research Development
(CNPq).
REFERENCES
1. Agu, O., Hamilton, G. and Baker, D., Graduated Compression Stockings in the Prevention of Venous
Thromboembolism, British Journal of Surgery, 1999, 86(8), 992-1004.
2. Scanlan, A.T., Dascombe, B.J., Reaburn, P.R. and Osborne, M., The Effects of Wearing Lower-Body
Compression Garments During Endurance Cycling, International Journal of Sports Physiology and
Performance, 2008, 3(4), 424-438.
3. Kraemer, W.J., Bush, J.A., Bauer, J.A., Triplett-McBride, N.T., Paxton, N.J., Clemson, A., Koziris, L.P.,
Mangino, L.C., Fry, A.C. and Newton, R.U., Influence of Compression Garments on Vertical Jump
Performance in NCAA Division I Volleybal Players, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research,
1996, 10(3), 180-183.
4. Kraemer, W.J., Bush, J.A., Triplett-McBride, N.T., Koziris, L.P., Mangino, L.C., Fry, A.C., McBride, J.M.,
Johnston, J., Volek, J.S., Young, C.A., Gómez, A.L. and Newton, R.U., Compression Garments: Influence on
Muscle Fatigue, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 1998, 12(4), 211-215.
5. Doan, B.K., Kwon, Y.H., Newton, R.U., Shim, J., Popper, E.M., Rogers, R.A., Bolt, L.R., Robertson, M. and
Kraemer, W.J., Evaluation of A Lower-Body Compression Garment, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2003, 21(8),
601-610.
6. Born, D.P., Sperlich, B. and Holmberg, H.C., Bringing Light Into the Dark: Effects of Compression Clothing
on Performance and Recovery, International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2013, 8(1), 4-
18.
7. Duffield, R., Edge, J., Merrells, R., Hawke, E., Barnes, M., Simcock, D. and Gill, N., The Effects of
Compression Garments on Intermittent Exercise Performance and Recovery on Consecutive Days,
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2008, 3(4), 454-468.
8. Higgins, T., Naughton, G.A. and Burgess, D., Effects of Wearing Compression Garments on Physiological
and Performance Measures in a Simulated Game-Specific Circuit for Netball, Journal of Science and
Medicine in Sport, 2009, 12(1), 223-226.
9. Ali, A., Creasy, R.H. and Edge, J.A., The Effect of Graduated Compression Stockings on Running
Performance, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2011, 25(5), 1385-1392.
10. Faulkner, J.A., Gleadon, D., McLaren, J. and Jakeman, J.R., Effect of Lower-Limb Compression Clothing
on 400-M Sprint Performance, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2013, 27(3), 669-676.
11. Bovenschen, H.J., Booij, M.T. and van der Vleuten, C.J., Graduated Compression Stockings for Runners:
Friend, Foe, or Fake?, Journal of Athletic Training, 2013, 48(2), 226-232.
12. Bringard, A., Perrey, S. and Belluye, N., Aerobic Energy Cost and Sensation Responses During Submaximal
Running Exercise - Positive Effects of Wearing Compression Tights, International Journal of Sports
Medicine, 2006, 27(5), 373-378.
13. Ali, A., Caine, M.P. and Snow, B.G., Graduated Compression Stockings: Physiological and Perceptual
Responses During and After Exercise, Journal of Sports Sciences, 2007, 25(4), 413-419.
14. Kemmler, W., von Stengel, S., Kockritz, C., Mayhew, J., Wassermann, A. and Zapf, J., Effect of Compression
Stockings on Running Performance in Men Runners, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research,
2009, 23(1), 101-105.
15. Ali, A., Creasy, R.H. and Edge, J.A., Physiological Effects of Wearing Graduated Compression Stockings
During Running, European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2010, 109(6), 1017-1025.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Volume 9 · Number 5 · 2014 991
16. Duffield, R., Cannon, J. and King, M., The Effects of Compression Garments on Recovery of Muscle
Performance Following High-Intensity Sprint and Plyometric Exercise, Journal of Science and Medicine in
Sport, 2010, 13(1), 136-140.
17. Dascombe, B., Laursen, P., Nosaka, K. and Polglaze, T., No Effect of Upper Body Compression Garments
in Elite Flat-Water Kayakers, European Journal of Sport Science, 2011, 1-9.
18. Kraemer, W.J., Bush, J.A., Wickham, R.B., Denegar, C.R., Gomez, A.L., Gotshalk, L.A., Duncan, N.D.,
Volek, J.S., Newton, R.U., Putukian, M. and Sebastianelli, W.J., Continuous Compression as an Effective
Therapeutic Intervention in Treating Eccentric-Exercise-Induced Muscle Soreness, Journal of Sport
Rehabilitation, 2001, 10(1), 11-23.
19. Kraemer, W.J., Bush, J.A., Wickham, R.B., Denegar, C.R., Gomez, A.L., Gotshalk, L.A., Duncan, N.D.,
Volek, J.S., Putukian, M. and Sebastianelli, W.J., Influence of Compression Therapy on Symptoms Following
Soft Tissue Injury from Maximal Eccentric Exercise, The Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical
Therapy, 2001, 31(6), 282-290.
20. Kraemer, W.J., Flanagan, S.D., Comstock, B.A., Fragala, M.S., Earp, J.E., Dunn-Lewis, C., Ho, J.Y.,
Thomas, G.A., Solomon-Hill, G., Penwell, Z.R., Powell, M.D., Wolf, M.R., Volek, J.S., Denegar, C.R. and
Maresh, C.M., Effects of a Whole Body Compression Garment on Markers of Recovery After a Heavy
Resistance Workout in Men and Women, The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 2010, 24(3),
804-814.
21. Duffield, R. and Portus, M., Comparison of Three Types of Full-Body Compression Garments on Throwing
and Repeat-Sprint Performance in Cricket Players, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007, 41(7), 409-414.
22. Sibbald, B. and Roland, M., Understanding Controlled Trials. Why Are Randomised Controlled Trials
Important?, British Medicine Journal, 1998, 316(7126), 201.
23. Brown, L.E., Whitehurst, M., Bryant, J.R. and Buchalter, D.N., Reliability of the Biodex System 2 Isokinetic
Dynamometer Concentric Mode, lsokinetics and Exercise Science, 1993, 3(3), 160-163.
24. Brown, L.E., Sjostrom, T., Comeau, M.J., Whitehurst, M., Greenwood, M. and Findley, B.W., Kinematics of
Biophysically Asymmetric Limbs Within Rate of Velocity Development, The Journal of Bone & Joint
Surgery British Volume, 2005, 19(2), 298-301.
25. Houghton, L.A., Dawson, B. and Maloney, S.K., Effects of Wearing Compression Garments on
Thermoregulation During Simulated Team Sport Activity in Temperate Environmental Conditions, Journal
of Science and Medicine in Sport, 2009, 12(2), 303-309.
26. Goh, S.S., Laursen, P.B., Dascombe, B. and Nosaka, K., Effect of Lower Body Compression Garments on
Submaximal and Maximal Running Performance in Cold (10˚C) and Hot (32 ˚C) Environments, European
Journal of Applied Physiology, 2010, 111(5), 819-826.
27. Menetrier, A., Mourot, L., Bouhaddi, M., Regnard, J. and Tordi, N., Compression Sleeves Increase Tissue
Oxygen Saturation but Not Running Performance, International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011, 32(11),
864-868.
28. Barrack, R.L., Skinner, H.B., Cook, S.D. and Haddad, R.J., Jr., Effect of Articular Disease and Total Knee
Arthroplasty on Knee Joint-Position Sense, Journal of Neurophysiology, 1983, 50(3), 684-687.
29. Barrett, D.S., Cobb, A.G. and Bentley, G., Joint Proprioception in Normal, Osteoarthritic and Replaced
Knees, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume, 1991, 73(1), 53-56.
30. Cotterman, M.L., Darby, L.A. and Skelly, W.A., Comparison of Muscle Force Production Using the Smith
Machine and Free Weights for Bench Press and Squat Exercises, The Journal of Strength & Conditioning
Research, 2005, 19(1), 169-176.
992 The Effects of Graduated Compression Sleeves on Muscle Performance
... However, it should be noted that agreed pressure guidelines do not necessarily result in the same classifications in all countries; for example, in the UK, France and Germany, specific compression garment pressures correspond to different classifications [3]. In the UK, the guidelines have three pressure classifications (BS-6612;1985): Classes one (14-17 mmHg), two (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and three (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). Wearing compression garments is common in sporting environments [4,5]. ...
... The asymmetrical garment was designed to elicit control conditions in the left leg and graduated compression in the right. The pressure classifications used in this study corresponded to UK compression standards (BS-6612; 1985): Classes one (14-17 mmHg), two (18-24 mmHg) and three (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). ...
... Therefore, no differences in peak pressure or pressure gradient were found between legs in the control and symmetrical garment conditions (P < 0.05). Many compression garment studies have either not measured the pressure elicited by a garment [13,[26][27][28][29] or they have relied on pressures stated by the manufacturer [7,14,30]. As such, it is difficult, if not impossible, to link a particular garment pressure or profile to a particular performance or recovery outcome. ...
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to make made-to-measure compression garments that elicit pressures within and below clinical standards. The study also examined whether pressures and gradients can be replicated within and between participants' legs, and between separate compression garment conditions. Ten males volunteered to participate. Based on three-dimensional scans of the participants' lower body, three different made-to-measure garments were manufactured: control, symmetrical and asymmetrical. Garment pressures were assessed from the malleolus to the gluteal fold using a pressure monitoring device. A root mean squared difference analysis was used to calculate the in vivo linear graduation parameters. Linear regression showed that peak pressure at the ankle in the left and right leg were: control garment, 13.5 ± 2.3 and 12.9 ± 2.6; asymmetrical garment, 12.7 ± 2.5 and 26.3 ± 3.4; symmetrical garment, 27.7 ± 2.2 and 27.5 ± 1.6 (all mmHg, mean ± standard deviation). Pressure reduction from the ankle to the gluteal fold in the left and right leg were: control, 8.9 ± 3.5 and 7.4 ± 3.0; asymmetrical , 7.8 ± 3.9 and 21.9 ± 3.2; symmetrical, 25.0 ± 4.1 and 22.3 ± 3.6 (all mmHg, mean ± standard deviation). Made-to-measure compression garments can be made to elicit pressures within and below clinical standards, and to elicit equivalent pressures and gradients in different participants.
... With the use of sleeves, four studies based their protocol on strength exercises [31][32][33][34] and another on different frequency intensities of vibration [35]. No significant improvements were found in strength levels [14,[31][32][33], vibration [35], or maximal voluntary contraction and blood lactate concentration [31]. ...
... With the use of sleeves, four studies based their protocol on strength exercises [31][32][33][34] and another on different frequency intensities of vibration [35]. No significant improvements were found in strength levels [14,[31][32][33], vibration [35], or maximal voluntary contraction and blood lactate concentration [31]. The only beneficial effect found was improved motor control of external rotation of the glenohumeral joint [34]. ...
... It is worth bearing in mind, however, that decreased lactate concentration is not necessarily a valid indicator of the quality of recovery [59]. When compression garments were applied in the recovery phase, only detrimental effects were found in lactate accumulation [15,20,22,23,33]. But when they were applied during exercise, both beneficial [29,42,48] and detrimental effects [13,28,30,31,51] were recorded. ...
Article
Full-text available
Compression garments are becoming increasingly popular among sportspeople who wish to improve performance and reduce their exercise discomfort and risk of injury. However, evidence for such effects is scarce. This paper presents the evidence following a review of the literature evaluating the effects of the application of compression garments on sports performance and recovery after exercise. The literature reviewed was the result of a search on the Web of Science, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases for studies which analysed the effect of compression garments on physiological, psychological, and biomechanical parameters during and after exercise. These search criteria were met by 40 studies. Most studies do not demonstrate any beneficial effect on performance, immediate recovery, or delay in the appearance of muscle pain. They do, however, show a positive trend towards a beneficial effect during recovery: the subsequent performance improved in five of the eight studies where it was measured, and the perception of muscle damage was reduced in five of six studies. In summary, the use of compression garments during recovery from exercise appears to be beneficial, although the factors explaining this efficacy have yet to be established. No adverse effects of the use of compression garments have been demonstrated.
... Pérez-Soriano et al. present a review article but were unable to reach any consensus conclusion on the beneficial effect on performance, immediate recovery or delay in the appearance of muscle pain. The main conclusion they drew was that they did not identify any adverse effects from wearing compression garments [26]. Pereira et al. conducted a study on the effects of compression sleeves on muscle performance during high-intensity exercises, in this case, resistance training, having concluded that despite not detecting improvements in muscle performance, the sleeves also did not induce any restriction, so they can be used to, for example, reduce recovery time or prevent muscle injuries [27]. ...
Chapter
The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of using a compression garment during the throwing and reception of a handball ball, on the myoelectric activity of the upper limb muscles, namely the muscle activity of the arm, biceps and lateral head of the triceps, in young adults. In the studied sample, which included 21 volunteers (8 females and 13 males; 24.83 ± 2.48 years) who performed a total of 20 throws per overhead and 20 receptions, with and without compression garment, which totaled 40 tests for each volunteer, corresponding to a total of 840 valid results. Muscular recruitment was measured by surface electromyography in the dominant upper limb. Data extracted were activation duration time (AT) in seconds and the contraction intensity normalized to the maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC), in percentage. The presence of the compression garment increases muscle recruitment with statistically significant differences in the reception movement (p = 0.019 for biceps, p = 0.039 for triceps), but it has no effect on the throws per overhead on any of the variables under study. However, it is possible to observe a trend towards higher values for tests performed with a compression garment.
... A variety of resistance exercise protocols have been used to assess the influence of CGs on strength and power outcome measures, with no significant positive effects of the garments recorded. Three similar studies of elbow flexion force using isokinetic dynamometry found no change to average torque, work, or power [65] or maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force [66,67] with the use of upper body CGs, though interestingly, a full-sleeve upper body garment significantly improved visuomotor tracking performance 1-3 days post-exercise [66]. Similarly, bench press performance (peak and mean power, isometric strength, and muscular endurance) was unchanged with the use of arm sleeves in a singleblind study design [68]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Compression garments (CGs) are a popular tool that may act on physiological, physical, neuromuscular, biomechanical, and/or perceptual domains during exercise and recovery from exercise, with varying levels of efficacy. While previous reviews have focused on the effects of CGs during running, high-intensity exercise, and exercise recovery, a comprehensive systematic review that assesses the effectiveness of garment use both during and after exercise has not been recently conducted. Methods: A systematic search of the literature from the earliest record until May 2022 was performed based on the PRISMA-P guidelines for systematic reviews, using the online databases PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar. Results: 160 articles with 2530 total participants were included for analysis in the systematic review, comprised of 103 ‘during exercise’ studies, 42 ‘during recovery’ studies, and 15 combined design studies. Conclusions: During exercise, CGs have a limited effect on global measures of endurance performance but may improve some sport-specific variables (e.g., countermovement jump height). Most muscle proteins/metabolites are unchanged with the use of CGs during exercise, though measures of blood lactate tend to be lowered. CGs for recovery appear to have a positive benefit on subsequent bouts of endurance (e.g., cycling time trials) and resistance exercise (e.g., isokinetic dynamometry). CGs are associated with reductions in lactate dehydrogenase during recovery and are consistently associated with decreases in perceived muscle soreness following fatiguing exercise. This review may provide a useful point of reference for practitioners and researchers interested in the effect of CGs on particular outcome variables or exercise types.
... Bochmann et al. (2005) described an increase in forearm arterial blood flow compression induced by wearing forearm compression sleeves at rest and during a simultaneous lowintensity hand grip, but they did not assess actual exercise performance changes. In addition, Pereira et al. (2014) concluded that the use of a graduated arm compression sleeve does not enhance isokinetic elbow flexion muscle performance, but they did not measure oxygenation or blood volume changes. By contrast, wearing a long-sleeved full upper body compression garment resulted in a more maintained external shoulder rotation at 40-50% of maximum voluntary isometric contraction (Tsuruike and Ellenbecker, 2013) and in an enhanced perceptual recovery from manual-labor exercise (Chan et al., 2016). ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: Wearing compression garments is a commonly used intervention in sports to improve performance and facilitate recovery. Some evidence supports the use of forearm compression to improve muscle tissue oxygenation and enhance sports climbing performance. However, evidence is lacking for an effect of compression garments on hand grip strength and specific sports climbing performance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the immediate effects of forearm compression sleeves on muscular strength and endurance of finger flexor muscles in sports climbers. Materials and Methods: This randomized crossover study included 24 sports climbers who performed one familiarization trial and three subsequent test trials while wearing compression forearm sleeves (COMP), non-compressive placebo forearm sleeves (PLAC), or no forearm sleeves (CON). Test trials consisted of three performance measurements (intermittent hand grip strength and endurance measurements, finger hang, and lap climbing) at intervals of at least 48 h in a randomized order. Muscle oxygenation during hand grip and finger hang measurements was assessed by near-infrared spectroscopy. The maximum blood lactate level, rate of perceived exertion, and forearm muscle pain were also determined directly after the lap climbing trials. Results: COMP resulted in higher changes in oxy[heme] and tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) during the deoxygenation (oxy[heme]: COMP –10.7 ± 5.4, PLAC –6.7 ± 4.3, CON –6.9 ± 5.0 [μmol]; p = 0.014, ηp ² = 0.263; StO2: COMP –4.0 ± 2.2, PLAC –3.0 ± 1.4, CON –2.8 ± 1.8 [%]; p = 0.049, ηp ² = 0.194) and reoxygenation (oxy [heme]: COMP 10.2 ± 5.3, PLAC 6.0 ± 4.1, CON 6.3 ± 4.9 [μmol]; p = 0.011, ηp ² = 0.274; StO2: COMP 3.5 ± 1.9, PLAC 2.4 ± 1.2, CON 2.3 ± 1.9 [%]; p = 0.028, ηp ² = 0.225) phases of hand grip measurements, whereas total [heme] concentrations were not affected. No differences were detected between the conditions for the parameters of peak force and fatigue index in the hand grip, time to failure and hemodynamics in the finger hang, or performance-related parameters in the lap climbing measurements (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: Forearm compression sleeves did not enhance hand grip strength and endurance, sports climbing performance parameters, physiological responses, or perceptual measures. However, they did result in slightly more pronounced changes of oxy [heme] and StO2 in the deoxygenation and reoxygenation phases during the hand grip strength and endurance measurements.
... Although maximum voluntary elbow flexions were performed by subjects, triceps brachii would inevitably co-contract, which has been totally ignored. Secondly, compression garments with safe pressures on human (under 30 mm Hg) have been reported as not hindering skeletal muscles' deformation and undermining muscle contraction 34,35 . As soft tissue, biceps brachii can be squashed by the sensing belt of LGMS, leading to underestimated measured circumferences. ...
Article
Full-text available
A new bio-mechanical model for elbow flexions is proposed to quantify the elbow torque generated as a function of the upper-arm circumferential strain and influencing factors of elbow angle and angular velocity. The upper-arm circumferential strain is used to represent the contractile intensity of the dominant flexor, biceps brachii, whose behavior is described by Hill's theory. Experiments with thirteen healthy subjects were conducted to determine the influencing factors. The temporal distributions of torque and elbow angle were measured by Biodex ®3 simultaneously, while the upper-arm circumference was obtained by a wearable anthropometric measurement device. Within the experimental range, the change of angular velocity has been found to have no effect on the torque generated. The new model was further verified experimentally with reasonable agreements obtained. The mean relative error of the torque estimated from the model is 15% and 22%, for isokinetic and isotonic flexions, respectively. The verified model establishes the relationship between the torque generated and circumference strain of the upper arm, for the first time, thus provide a scientific foundation for the anthropometric measurement technology as an alternative to sEMG for monitoring force/torque generation during elbow flexions.
... The participants were seated on a Scott Bench with their elbow aligned with the axis of rotation of the dynamometer's lever arm. [19][20][21] The forearm remained in a supinated position throughout the test. Verbal encouragement was given throughout the test. ...
Article
This study investigated the effects of a 10-week resistance training to failure on neuromuscular adaptations in young women. Eighty-nine active young women were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) repetitions to failure (RF; three sets of repetitions to failure); 2) repetitions not to failure with equalized volume (RNFV; four sets of 7 repetitions); and 3) repetitions not to failure (RNF; three sets of 7 repetitions). All groups performed the elbow flexor exercise (bilateral biceps curl) and trained 2 days per week using 70% of 1RM. There were significant increases (p<0.05) in muscle strength after 5 (15.9% for RF, 18.4% for RNF, and 19.9% for RNFV) and 10 (28.3% for RF, 26.8% for RNF, and 28.3% for RNFV) weeks of training, with no significant differences between groups. Additionally, muscular endurance increased after 5 and 10 weeks, with no differences between groups. However, peak torque (PT) increased significantly at 180°.s-1 in the RNFV (13.7%) and RNF (4.1%) groups (p<0.05), whereas no changes were observed in the RF group (-0.5%). Muscle thickness increased significantly (p<0.05) in the RF and RNFV groups after 5 (RF: 8.4% and RNFV: 2.3%) and 10 weeks of training (RF: 17.5%, and RNFV: 8.5%), whereas no significant changes were observed in the RNF group (3.9 and 2.1% after 5 and 10 weeks, respectively). These data suggest that short-term training of repetitions to failure do not yield additional overall neuromuscular improvements in young women.
Article
Full-text available
Compression sportswear is widely used for enhancing exercise performances, facilitating recovery, and preventing injuries. Despite prior findings that confirmed positive effects on physical recovery after exercises, whether compression sportswear can enhance exercise performances has not been determined. Thus, this systematic meta-analysis examined the effects of compression sportswear on exercise performances including speed, endurance, strength and power, functional motor performance, and sport-related performance. We calculated effect sizes by comparing changes in exercise performances between the compression garment and the control group. Two additional moderator variable analyses determined whether altered exercise performances were different based on the types of participants and compression sportswear. For the total 769 participants from 42 included studies, the random-effect model found that compression sportswear significantly improved speed, endurance, and functional motor performances. Additional moderator variable analyses identified significant positive effects on speed for athletes, and endurance and functional motor performance for moderately trained adults. Further, whole-body compression garments were beneficial for improving speed, and lower-body compression garments effectively advanced endurance performances. For functional motor performances, both upper- and lower-body suits were effective. These findings suggest that wearing compression sportswear may be a viable strategy to enhance overall exercise performances.
Article
Full-text available
Background Compression garments are regularly worn during exercise to improve physical performance, mitigate fatigue responses, and enhance recovery. However, evidence for their efficacy is varied and the methodological approaches and outcome measures used within the scientific literature are diverse. Objectives The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of compression garments on commonly assessed outcome measures in response to exercise, including: performance, biomechanical, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory, muscle damage, thermoregulatory, and perceptual responses. Methods A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete) was performed from the earliest record to 27 December, 2020. Results In total, 183 studies were identified for qualitative analysis with the following breakdown: performance and muscle function outcomes: 115 studies (63%), biomechanical and neuromuscular: 59 (32%), blood and saliva markers: 85 (46%), cardiovascular: 76 (42%), cardiorespiratory: 39 (21%), thermoregulatory: 19 (10%) and perceptual: 98 (54%). Approximately 85% ( n = 156) of studies were published between 2010 and 2020. Conclusions Evidence is equivocal as to whether garments improve physical performance, with little evidence supporting improvements in kinetic or kinematic outcomes. Compression likely reduces muscle oscillatory properties and has a positive effect on sensorimotor systems. Findings suggest potential increases in arterial blood flow; however, it is unlikely that compression garments meaningfully change metabolic responses, blood pressure, heart rate, and cardiorespiratory measures. Compression garments increase localised skin temperature and may reduce perceptions of muscle soreness and pain following exercise; however, rating of perceived exertion during exercise is likely unchanged. It is unlikely that compression garments negatively influence exercise-related outcomes. Future research should assess wearer belief in compression garments, report pressure ranges at multiple sites as well as garment material, and finally examine individual responses and varying compression coverage areas.
Article
Full-text available
Abstract While the effect of lower body compression garments on performance and physiological responses are well documented, no studies have examined the effect of upper body compression garments (UBCG) on upper-body dominant exercise. This study examined the effects of wearing UBCG on performance and physiological responses during simulated flat-water kayaking. Five male (mean values±s: 21.8±2.8 years; 83.5±9.2 kg; 63.0±5.5 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) and two female (mean values±s: 25.0±4.2 years; 71.4±2.7 kg; 51.0±4.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1)) elite flat-water kayakers completed a six-step incremental test followed by a four-minute maximal performance test (4minPT) in both UBCG and control (no shirt or sports training bra) conditions in a randomized counter-balanced order. Heart rate and oxygen consumption ([Formula: see text]O2) as well as performance measures (power, distance covered, stroke rate) were recorded during the tests, and blood lactate was measured immediately after each incremental step and three minutes following the 4minPT. Near-infrared spectroscopy-derived measures of blood flow and oxygenation of the flexor carpi radialis were monitored continuously for all tests. No significant differences between the UBCG and control conditions were evident for any performance, cardiorespiratory or oxygenation measure across the incremental step test and 4minPT. It was concluded that wearing UBCG did not provide any significant physiological or performance benefits during simulated flat-water kayaking.
Article
Full-text available
Objective: To assess the effect of graduated compression stockings (GCS) on lower leg volume and leg complaints in runners during and after exercise. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre and an outdoor running track in Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Patients or other participants: Thirteen Dutch trained recreational runners. Intervention(s): Participants used a GCS on 1 leg during running. Main outcome measures: (1) Lower leg volume of both legs was measured at baseline, directly after running, and at 5 minutes and 30 minutes after running using a validated perometer. (2) Leg complaints were reported on questionnaires at set intervals. Results: (1) In both experiments, the legs with GCS showed a reduction in mean (± SEM) leg volume directly after running, as compared with the leg without GCS: -14.1 ± 7.6 mL (P = .04) for the 10-km running track and -53.5 ± 17.8 mL (P = .03) for the maximum exercise test. This effect was not observed at 5 and 30 minutes after running. (2) No differences in leg complaints were reported in either experiment. Conclusions: The GCS prevented an increase in leg volume just after the running exercise. However, this result was not accompanied by a reduction in subjective questionnaire-reported leg complaints. The practical consequences of the present findings need further study.
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of the Biodex System 2 isokinetic dynamometer. Twenty subjects performed knee concentric reciprocal extension/flexion exercise on 2 consecutive days, separated by 24 hours. Peak torque (PT), total work (TW), average power (AP), and joint angle at peak torque (JA) were collected from three repetitions across a velocity spectrum of 60, 120, 180, 240, 360, and 450 deg/sec. Correlation values between days 1 and 2 for PT, TW, and AP for both extension and flexion ranged from 0.86 to 0.98. The JA correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.69. Also, extension and flexion mean values for PT, TW, AP, and JA on day 1 were not significantly different (p < 0.05) from the mean values derived from day 2, with the exception of flexion JA at 60 deg/sec. It was concluded that the Biodex System 2 isokinetic dynamometer is a highly reliable instrument for assessing reciprocal concentric isokinetic parameters of knee extension/flexion.
Article
Full-text available
To assess original research addressing the effect of the application of compression clothing on sport performance and recovery after exercise, a computer-based literature research was performed in July 2011 using the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Studies examining the effect of compression clothing on endurance, strength and power, motor control, and physiological, psychological, and biomechanical parameters during or after exercise were included, and means and measures of variability of the outcome measures were recorded to estimate the effect size (Hedges g) and associated 95% confidence intervals for comparisons of experimental (compression) and control trials (noncompression). The characteristics of the compression clothing, participants, and study design were also extracted. The original research from peer-reviewed journals was examined using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale. Results indicated small effect sizes for the application of compression clothing during exercise for short-duration sprints (10-60 m), vertical-jump height, extending time to exhaustion (such as running at VO2max or during incremental tests), and time-trial performance (3-60 min). When compression clothing was applied for recovery purposes after exercise, small to moderate effect sizes were observed in recovery of maximal strength and power, especially vertical-jump exercise; reductions in muscle swelling and perceived muscle pain; blood lactate removal; and increases in body temperature. These results suggest that the application of compression clothing may assist athletic performance and recovery in given situations with consideration of the effects magnitude and practical relevance.
Article
Full-text available
Randomised controlled trials are the most rigorous way of determining whether a cause-effect relation exists between treatment and outcome and for assessing the cost effectiveness of a treatment. They have several important features: Other study designs, including non-randomised controlled …
Article
Full-text available
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of calf compression sleeves on running performance and on calf tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) at rest before exercise and during recovery period. 14 moderately trained athletes completed 2 identical sessions of treadmill running with and without calf compression sleeves in randomized order. Each session comprised: 15 min at rest, 30 min at 60% maximal aerobic velocity determined beforehand, 15 min of passive recovery, a running time to exhaustion at 100% maximal aerobic velocity, and 30 min of passive recovery. Calf StO2 was determined by near infra-red spectroscopy and running performance by the time to exhaustion. Compression sleeves increased significantly StO2 at rest before exercise (+ 6.4±1.9%) and during recovery from exercise (+ 7.4±1.7% and + 10.7±1.8% at 20th and 30th min of the last recovery period, respectively). No difference was observed between the times to exhaustion performed with and without compression sleeves (269.4±18.4 s and 263.3±19.8 s, respectively). Within the framework of this study, the compression sleeves do not improve running performance in tlim. However the StO2 results argue for further interest of this garment during effort recovery.
Article
This study assessed whether opposing compression forces produced by commercially available "compression shorts" affect the repetitive force production capabilities of the thigh muscles during repetitive open- and closed-kinetic-chain exercise tests. Twenty healthy young adults (10 men, age 25.2 +/- 3.8 yrs; 10 women, age 23.2 +/- 4.8 yrs) volunteered to take part in the study. All were recreationally trained and participated in both weight training and endurance training programs in their weekly exercise routines. Testing was conducted using a balanced and randomized treatment design with two experimental conditions consisting of compression shorts (CS) and control (no compression) shorts; thus all subjects served as their own controls. Testing consisted of 3 sets of 50 maximal isokinetic knee extension/ flexion movements at 180[degrees] * sec-1 on a Cybex 6000 dynamometer and the maximal number of reps at 70% 1-RM using a Trusquat exercise machine. No significant differences were found between the CS and control conditions in peak torque or total work performed in the isokinetic knee extension/flexion exercise or in max number of reps performed with the Trusquat. The results indicate that compression garments made for long-term wear and commonly worn by athletes and fitness enthusiasts during training and competition do not contribute to any additional fatigue in repetitive high-intensity exercise tasks. (C) 1998 National Strength and Conditioning Association
Article
The current study investigated the effects of wearing a variety of lower limb compression garments on 400m sprint performance. Eleven male 400m runners (23.7 ± 5.7 y, 1.78 ± 0.08 m, 75.3 ± 10.0 kg) completed six, 400m running tests on an outdoor, all-weather running track on separate occasions. Participants completed two runs either with long-length lower-limb compression garments (LG; hip-to-ankle), a combination of short-length lower-limb compression garments (SG; hip-to-knee) with calf compression sleeves (CS; ankle-to-knee), or without compression garments (CON; shorts), in a randomised, counterbalanced order. Overall lap time and 100m split times, heart rate and ratings of perceived exertion were measured during the 400m run. Blood lactate concentration, visual analogue scales for perceived soreness, feeling and arousal, as well as scales for perceived comfort and tightness when wearing compression garments, were assessed before (pre-exercise, post warm-up) and after 400 m performance (post, 4-min post exercise, following a warm-down). Statistical analysis revealed no differences between conditions in overall 400m performance, 100m split times or blood lactate concentration (P > .05), although there was a trend for an increased rate of blood lactate clearance when wearing compression garments. A significantly lower RPE (P > .05), was however observed during LG (13.8 ± 0.9) and SG (13.4 ± 1.1) when compared to CON (14.0 ± 1.0). The present study has demonstrated that lower-limb compression garments may lower the effort perception associated with 400 m performance, despite no differences in overall athletic performance.
Article
Context Prior investigations using ice, massage, or exercise have not shown efficacy in relieving delayed-onset muscle soreness. Objectives To determine whether a compression sleeve worn immediately after maximal eccentric exercise enhances recovery. Design Randomized, controlled clinical study. Setting University sports medicine laboratory. Participants Fifteen healthy, non-strength-trained men, matched for physical criteria, randomly placed in a control group or a continuous compression-sleeve group (CS). Methods and Measures Subjects performed 2 sets of 50 arm curls. 1RM elbow flexion at 60°/s, upper-arm circumference, resting-elbow angle, serum creatine kinase (CK), and perception-of-soreness data were collected before exercise and for 3 days. Results CK was significantly ( P < .05) elevated from the baseline value in both groups, although the elevation in the CS group was less. CS prevented loss of elbow extension, decreased subjects’ perception of soreness, reduced swelling, and promoted recovery of force production. Conclusions Compression is important in soft-tissue-injury management.
Article
The purpose of this study was to determine whether compression shorts affected vertical jump performance. Subjects, 18 men and 18 women varsity volleyball players, were thoroughly familiarized with the jump tests and experimental techniques. Testing utilized compression shorts of normal fit (CS), undersized compression shorts (UCS), and loose fitting gym shorts as the control garment (CT). All tests were conducted on the same day using a balanced, randomized block design to remove day-to-day variation. Jumps were performed on an AMTI force plate interfaced to a computer with customized software to determine jump force and power. Ten consecutive maximal countermovement jumps with hands held at waist level were evaluated. The garments had no effect on maximal force or power of the highest jump. However, mean force and power production over the 10 jumps when wearing the CS were significantly (p < 0.05) higher than CT for both men and women. In men the UCS mean power production was also higher than the CT. The data indicate that compression shorts, while not improving single maximal jump power, have a significant effect on repetitive vertical jumps by helping to maintain higher mean jumping power.