Content uploaded by Suren Gazaryan
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Suren Gazaryan on Mar 22, 2016
Content may be subject to copyright.
115
Lynx, n. s. (Praha), 40: 115–126 (2009). ISSN 0024–7774
Does Tadarida teniotis really occur in Crimea? (Chiroptera: Molossidae)
Vyskytuje sa Tadarida teniotis skutočne na Kryme? (Chiroptera: Molossidae)
Marcel UHRIN1,4, Suren GAZARYAN2 & Petr BENDA3,4
1 Slovak Bat Conservation Society, B. Němcovej 141/5, SK–050 01 Revúca, Slovakia;
marcel.uhrin@gmail.com
2 Institute of Ecology of Mountain Territories, Kabardino-Balkarian Scientific Center of the Russian
Academy of Science, Nalchik 360000, Russia; s-gazaryan@yandex.ru
3 Department of Zoology, National Museum (Natural History), Václavské nám. 68, CZ–115 79 Praha 1,
Czech Republic; petr.benda@nm.cz
4 Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Viničná 7, CZ–128 44 Praha 2,
Czech Republic
received on 20 December 2009
Abstract. Echolocation calls identified as searching calls of Tadarida teniotis were recorded at two sites
in the forested mountainous part of the Crimean Peninsula, Ukraine, in September 2009. Description of
the records is given and possible occurrence of T. teniotis in Crimea is discussed.
Key words. Tadarida, echolocation, distribution, Crimea, Ukraine.
INTRODUCTION
The European free-tailed bat, Tadarida teniotis (Rafinesque, 1814), is a true Mediterranean bat
species and the only representative of the family Molossidae Gervais, 1856 in Europe as well as in
the Mediterranean parts of Africa and the Middle East (CORBET 1978, HORÁČEK et al. 2000).
Whereas the southern margin of distribution range of T. teniotis in the western Palaearctic is
clearly limited by severe arid habitats of the Sahara and Arabian deserts (AELLEN 1966, HARRISON
& BATES 1991, IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004), the northern margin of its range seems to be un-
stable, similarly as the climate in the northern regions of the Mediterranean zone. Based on the
records published – fundamentally reviewed by AELLEN (1966) – IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ (2004)
described the northern margin of regular distribution of T. teniotis in Europe go to from the
Pyrenees (Port d’Aula) and southernmost France (Pont du Gard) along the Rhone valley (Pont
d’Arc; Le Marais) to southern Switzerland (Sankt-Gotthard-Pass; Bellinzona), northeastern Italy
(Val-Lagarina), and coastal Croatia (Split) to Macedonia (Markova Kula; Demir Kapija) and
Bulgaria (Sandanski; Rodopy Mts.). This line was more or less accepted by subsequent authors
(DIETZ et al. 2007, AULAGNIER et al. 2008, GRIMMBERGER et al. 2009). However, several known
occurrence points lie northwards of the line demarcated by IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ (2004); the
Channel Island of Jersey, the town of Basel and the peninsula of Crimea. Although the latter
authors doubted occurrence in the Atlantic island of Madeira indicated by DOBSON (1878), they
accepted the (northernmost) record from Jersey published also by DOBSON (1878) as well as the
record from Crimea taken from AELLEN (1966).
116
The record from Basel (NW Switzerland) was published by SCHNEIDER (1871) and for a long
time it represented northernmost known point of T. teniotis occurrence in mainland Europe.
This record has been exceeded only recently by the finding of a handicapped Tadarida male
in Stuttgart, SW Germany (ANONYMUS 1992, 1993). Anyway, both these records from regions
north of the Alps as well as from Jersey are considered as accidental strays (ANONYMUS 1992,
IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004).
The occurrence of T. teniotis in Crimea represents the northernmost occurrence spot of the
species in the portion of Europe east of the Alps (KOCK & NADER 1984, see also BENDA et al.
2003 and CIECHANOWSKI et al. 2005). This occurrence was considered real and mentioned without
any notes and/or doubts by LANZA (1959), AELLEN (1966), KOCK & NADER (1984) and IBÁÑEZ
& PÉREZ-JORDÁ (2004). The only individual of T. teniotis from Crimea was reported by JENTINK
(1888: 202). Among eight specimens of Nyctinomus cestonii [= Tadarida teniotis] coming
from Dalmatia and Egypt, he also mentioned a specimen with a note: “Femelle semi-adulte. La
Crimée.”. SATUNIN (1914: 44) mentioned, most probably based on the JENTINK’s (1888) report,
the Crimean occurrence of T. teniotis as follows: “A doubtful report exists about finding of this
[free-tailed] bat on the southern coast of Crimea.” [translated from Russian]. Later on, OGNEV
(1927: 157) referred: “In Satunin’s ‘Conspectus Mammalium Imperii Rosici’ (1914, p. 44) is a
doubtful indication that a bat of the genus Nyctinomus [= Tadarida] inhabits the southern coast of
Crimea. Surely this can be only N. teniotis Rafinesque, a species of the Mediterranean subregion.”
OGNEV (1928) in his famous book repeated exactly the words from SATUNIN (1914) concerning
doubts about the (JENTINK’s?) report of T. teniotis from Crimea. These three very short notes
by SATUNIN and OGNEV are the only published reports of East-European authors related to the
occurrence of this species in Crimea. However, presence of T. teniotis was not mentioned in the
Fig. 1. Karstic depression near Pčelinoe covered by pastures and forest patches and surrounded by limestone
slopes. The site of evidence of the echolocation calls of Tadarida teniotis (photo by Zdeňka BENDOVÁ).
Obr. 1. Krasová depresia pri dedine Pčelinoe s mozaikou pasienkov a lesov obklopená vápencovými
svahmi. Lokalita záznamu echolokačných signálov Tadarida teniotis (foto Zdeňka BENDOVÁ).
117
first survey of the regional bat fauna (BRAUNER” 1912), and no record or museum specimen from
Crimea or Ukraine was referred by later Ukrainian and Russian authors (KUZÂKIN 1950, 1965,
ABELÈNCEV & POPOV 1956, STRELKOV 1962, 1981, DULICKIJ 1974, 2001a, b, KONSTANTINOV et al.
1976, ORLOV 1984, BORISENKO & PAVLINOV 1995, ZAGORODNÛK & GODLEVS’KA 2001, DULICKIJ
& KOVALENKO 2003, ŠEVČENKO & ZOLOTUHINA 2005, GODLEVSKAÂ et al. 2009, etc.).
Anyway, the occurrence of T. teniotis in Crimea is well conceivable from the biogeographical
point of view. The species inhabits the Caucasus – a biogeographical region continuing southeast
to the Crimean mountain range. Two sites of T. teniotis records are known from the northern
slopes of the Greater Caucasus Mts.; KORNEEV & MARISOVA (1950) reported a record of a male
from the Berezovaâ river canyon (43° 52’ N, 42° 42’ E) near Kislovodsk made in July 1948. A co-
lony of ca. 10 individuals of T. teniotis was discovered in a small cave in the Čerek river canyon
(43° 15’ N, 43° 20’ E) ca. 30 km SW of Nalčik on 21 August 1960 (TEMBOTOV & ŠABAEV 1962)
and a juvenile male was found at the same site on 23 September 2005 (GAZARÂN & TEMBOTOVA
2007). Several records of T. teniotis are known also from Transcaucasia (KUZÂKIN 1950, 1965;
E. YAVRUYAN ad verb.) as well as from the Pontic region of Turkey (BENDA & HORÁČEK 1998).
Results of a bat research carried out in Crimea in the last years (KONSTANTINOV et al. 1976,
PETRUŠENKO 2001, GODLEVSKAÂ 2003, GODLEVSKAÂ et al. 2009) did not bring any signs of occur-
rence of Tadarida teniotis. However, during a recent field trip to Crimea we recorded several call
sequences which could suggest presence of T. teniotis in this southernmost part of Ukraine.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Bat calls were recorded during a two-week (10–23 September 2009) field trip carried out mainly in the
forested mountain portion of the Crimean Peninsula (Krymskye gory Mts.). Acoustic recordings were
made using the portable ultrasound detectors D240x (Pettersson Elektronik AB, Uppsala, Sweden). De-
tectors were set on the time-expansion mode and were connected to Sony MD Walkman MZ-NH600 or
to Edirol R-09 (Roland Corp., Japan) recorders. Altogether, 257 sequences with bat calls were recorded
in the field.
The recordings were analysed with the software BatSound 3.0 (Pettersson Elektronik AB, Uppsala,
Sweden). The sampling frequency of 22,050 samples/s with 16 bits/sample and expansion factor 10 were
used. Using Edirol, time-expanded sequences were digitised at the sampling rate 48 kHz with 16-bit preci-
sion and saved as *wav files. A 512 pt. FFT with Hanning window was used for analyses and oscilograms,
power spectra and spectrograms were evaluated. For echolocation calls, the following parameters of the
call were measured: total pulse duration (D), start frequency (SF), end frequency (EF; both SF and EF at
–40 dB below the peak power spectral intensity), frequency of maximum energy (Fmax) and inter-pulse
interval (IPI, the time between two consecutive calls). The measured parameters of potential Tadarida
teniotis calls were compared with the published data concerning this species (e.g., ZBINDEN & ZINGG 1986,
ZINGG 1990, RUSSO & JONES 2002, OBRIST et al. 2004, BAYEFSKY-ANAND et al. 2008).
RECORDS
In total, among more than 250 bat call sequences, eight call sequences (23 сalls), were considered as
possible Tadarida teniotis calls.
1. Pčelinoe [Пчелиное], pastures and a small lake ca. 3 km E of the village (Belogorsk [Белогорск]
Dist.), 44° 56’ N, 34° 35’ E, 460 m a. s. l. (Fig. 1), 19 September 2009, one call sequence of one individual
recorded, two calls analysed.
The site is situated in a large karstic depression surrounded by a range of limestone slopes without vege-
tation cover on the top (Fig. 1). The main habitat types include pastures and deciduous forests (composed
118
mainly of Carpinus sp.), on the bottom of the depression the pastures are alternated with various lines of
bushes and trees (e.g., Juglans regia, Crataegus sp., Rosa sp., Betula sp., Populus sp., etc.). Bats were
recorded in the surroundings of a small artificial pond, from the southern side surrounded by a dense forest
and from the northern side by a pasture lined by hedgerows and other higher vegetation lines. The lake is
ca. 50×40 m in size, its littoral vegetation is composed of Typha sp., Phragmites sp. and manifold bush.
At minimum, tens of individuals belonging to six bat species were recorded at this site between 8.30
and 9.30 pm. No voices of the European free-tailed bat audible by a naked ear were recognised, the calls
were found only during the analysis of the recordings. Among call sequences of Nyctalus noctula, Epte-
sicus serotinus, Hypsugo savii, Pipistrellus pipistrellus and P. nathusii / P. kuhlii (see some of sequences
in Fig. 2) only two calls of T. teniotis with non-linear FM-QCF structure could be detected and measured
(Fig. 2). The parameters of these two calls are as follows: D=21.4 and 25.0 ms; SF=16.1 and 13.5 kHz;
EF=11.8 and 11.7 kHz, Fmax=12.8 and 11.9 kHz, and IPI=653 ms.
2. Partizanskoe [Партизанское], above the Avunda [Авунда] creek (Âlta [Ялта] Dist.), 44° 33’ N,
34° 15’ E, 435 m a. s. l. (Fig. 3), 16 September 2009, seven call sequences of 1–2 individuals were re-
corded and analysed.
The locality is situated in an old-growth beech forest in the creek canyon. From 8.30 to 10.30 pm, bat or
bats which emitted the calls, flew several times above the forest canopy. The calls were well audible by
a naked ear and in the heterodyne mode of the bat detector. The recorded calls had only CF structures with
the following parameters: D=210.0–341.0 ms (n=6, mean=272.50 ms), SF=10.7–12.2 kHz (mean=11.43);
EF=11.8–16.0 kHz (mean=13.36), Fmax=11.9–12.4 kHz (mean=12.44 kHz), IPI=780–950 ms (Fig. 4).
Along with the above mentioned calls, echolocation and social calls of Rhinolophus hipposideros, Pi-
Fig. 2. Spectrogram of echolocation calls of bats recorded above a small artificial lake at Pčelinoe, 19 Sep-
tember 2009 (1 – Tadarida teniotis, 2 – Nyctalus noctula, 3 – Eptesicus serotinus, 4 – Hypsugo savii). The
smaller figure (above left) shows power spectrum of the first pulse of T. teniotis call.
Obr. 2. Spektrogram echolokačných signálov netopierov zaznamenaných nad umelým jazierkom pri osade
Pčelinoe, 19. september 2009 (1 – Tadarida teniotis, 2 – Nyctalus noctula, 3 – Eptesicus serotinus, 4 – Hy-
psugo savii). Na malom obrázku vľavo hore je zobrazené spektrum energií prvého výkriku T. teniotis.
119
Fig. 3. Limestone walls above the Avunda creek canyon at Partizanskoe. The site of evidence of the
echolocation calls of (perhaps) Tadarida teniotis (photo by Suren GAZARYAN).
Obr. 3. Vápencové steny nad kaňonom potoka Avunda pri dedine Partizanskoje. Lokalita záznamu echo-
lokačných signálov (azda) Tadarida teniotis (foto Suren GAZARJAN).
Fig. 4. Spectrogram of echolocation calls of cf. Tadarida teniotis recorded at the Avunda creek near Par-
tizanskoe on 16 September 2009.
Obr. 4. Spektrogram echolokačných signálov cf. Tadarida teniotis zaznamenaných pri potoku Avunda
blízko osady Partizanskoe 16. septembra 2009.
120
pistrellus pipistrellus, P. pygmaeus, Barbastella barbastellus and Plecotus auritus were recorded in this
locality.
DISCUSSION
The call recorded near Pčelinoe could represent an evidence of Tadarida teniotis in Crimea
– despite the fact that only two particular calls were detected and analysed. The measured
parameters of these calls lie within the variation ranges evidenced in the European range of T.
teniotis (ZBINDEN & ZINGG 1986, ZINGG 1990, OBRIST et al. 2004). The values of pulse duration
are near the range maximum described by RUSSO & JONES (2002) and/or BAYEFSKY-ANAND et
al. (2008), all other parameter values from the Crimean recordings conform to the measure
ranges given by the latter and former authors. Similar call patterns as we found in the Crimean
recordings were also reported from T. teniotis calls recorded in the Middle East (Sinai, Israel,
Syria; ULANOVSKY et al. 2004, BENDA et al. 2006, 2008, BAYEFSKY-ANAND et al. 2008).
When only the values of the frequency of maximum energy are considered, the calls recorded
in Crimea could be theoretically confused with the territorial or social calls of Eptesicus nilssonii
(Keyserling et Blasius, 1839), Vespertilio murinus Linnaeus, 1758 and/or Nyctalus leisleri (Kuhl,
1817) (see AHLÉN & BAAGØE 1999, PFALZER & KUSCH 2003, AHLÉN 2004, and VON HELVERSEN
& VON HELVERSEN 1994). While Eptesicus nilssonii has never been recorded in Crimea and this
region is far outside its distribution range (see e.g., RYDELL 1993), the latter two species are
common bats in the Peninsula, at least seasonally (unpubl. observations of the authors). The
“advertising songs” of Nyctalus leisleri are usually displayed from one site (perch), which
is most usually situated on the bark of a tree trunk (VON HELVERSEN & VON HELVERSEN 1994).
However, the Crimean T. teniotis calls were recorded among numerous bats of several species
flying above the surface of a small lake and were well distinguishable from their calls (Nycta-
lus noctula (Schreber, 1774), Eptesicus serotinus (Schreber, 1774), Hypsugo savii (Bonaparte,
1837); see Fig. 2). Additionally, the general pattern of these T. teniotis signals, mainly their pulse
durations, inter-pulse interval, frequencies of maximum energy and also the lack of harmonics
can be well distinguished from all the mentioned species. In conclusion, the parameters of the
respective calls recorded at Pčelinoe fall well into the ranges of the parameters given for various
Mediterranean populations of T. teniotis and hardly give other identification alternative.
Interpretation of the recording of a call sequence made above the Avunda creek near Par-
tizanskoe is rather difficult. These calls have a linear character with clear constant frequency
(CF) pulse and with very long duration. The frequency of maximum energy in these calls was
11.9–12.4 kHz. Such echolocation pattern has not been described for T. teniotis calls from any
region within its distribution range (e.g., ZBINDEN & ZINGG 1986, RUSSO & JONES 2002, BAYEF-
SKY-ANAND et al. 2008, BENDA et al. 2008) and the oscilogram and spectrogram of these calls
give a picture rather similar to those of some representatives of grasshoppers (see e.g., RAGGE
& REYNOLDS 1998). On the other hand, the calls were clearly audible directly in the field from
a fast-flying object, and in the heterodyne mode of the bat detector they had the patterns (e.g.
loud and sharp sounds) described by AHLÉN (1990) and/or BARATAUD (1996). There are no other
bat species in Crimea, which could emit similarly strong audible calls at these frequencies. Only
OBRIST et al. (2004) showed among echolocation call variations also examples of very narrow-
-band, (quasi-)constant frequency vocalizations in e.g. Pipistrellus spp., Vespertilio murinus
and also in T. teniotis which are similar to our recordings.
The presented recordings, at least that made at Pčelinoe, seem to be good evidence of the
presence of Tadarida teniotis in Crimea. It is the first direct record of the species in the Peninsula
121
as well as in Ukraine and gives credit to the only available previous report by JENTINK (1888),
considered doubtful by most of Ukrainian and Russian authors (see Introduction). Although
the Crimean records of T. teniotis could seem to be exceptions from their extreme rarity, there
are good conditions for the occurrence of this bat in southern Crimea. The climatic, vegetation
and faunal zoning traditionally include southern parts of the Peninsula – coastal areas and
coastwise mountain ranges – into the Pontic province of the Mediterranean arboreal zoogeo-
graphic zone (SEDLAG & WEINERT 1987, BLONDEL & ARONSON 1999). This relatively narrow strip
of Mediterranean habitats in southern Crimea continues from Pontic and Colchic regions of
that province adjacent to the eastern shore of the Black Sea, where T. teniotis is already a well
known inhabitant (see Introduction); the Crimean localities lie at the distance of ca. 650 km
from the closest Caucasian site near Kislovodsk. The steep limestone mountain ranges along the
southern shore of Crimea could undoubtedly provide adequate roosting opportunities for this bat
(cf. ARLETTAZ 1990, IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004; Fig. 3). At least Rhinolophus ferrumequinum
(Schreber, 1774), Myotis emarginatus (Geoffroy, 1806), Miniopterus schreibersii (Kuhl, 1817),
and Hypsugo savii (Bonaparte, 1837) represent true Mediterranean elements in the Crimean
bat fauna (DULICKIJ 2001a, b, GODLEVSKAÂ et al. 2009); records of these bats are reported only
from the mountainous southern part of Crimea where they also reach the northern margins of
their distribution ranges in the broader region of easternmost Europe (see e.g. CORBET 1978). T.
teniotis, another typical Mediterranean element among European bats, could find natural limits
of its northern distribution in eastern Europe just in southern Crimea, which however, is not the
northernmost point within its whole range (see Introduction).
Although the occurrence of T. teniotis in Crimea seems to be well veritable from the ecolo-
gical and biogeographical points of view, it is rather impossible to consider it regular. The real
regular distribution of T. teniotis, known from southern European countries and from many
Mediterranean islands (see the reviews by IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004 and BENDA et al. 2009),
is well detectable both with the help of bat detectors and by a naked ear only after a very short
field exploration in quite different landscape types. On the other hand, in the Mediterranean
habitats of the Levant (Cyprus, Syria, Lebanon), T. teniotis is considered to represent a regu-
lar inhabitant of the region but its evidence is rather scarce when compared to the abundace
of records in the European thermo-Mediterranean zone (see BENDA et al. 2006, 2007, 2009,
HORÁČEK et al. 2008). Anyway, based on our field experience, in these countries of the eastern
Mediterranean, T. teniotis can be detected in suitable habitats with certain luck regularly during
every research trip. However, no evidence of T. teniotis existence was available in Crimea in
the last 120 years.
Thus, we consider the occurrence of T. teniotis in Crimea rather temporal and its records as
evidences of strays from a region of known (regular) occurrence and repeated records, most
probably from the Caucasian region. T. teniotis is a strong and fast flyer, certainly able to make
long-distance migrations within and from areas of its regular occurrence in the thermo-Me-
diterranean zone. The habitats where the records were made, a forested mountain valley and
a plateau covered with a mosaic of pastures, light forests and lakes, are not the most typical
foraging areas of the species (IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004). On the other hand, the species
shows individual variation in foraging habits (RUSSO & JONES 2003, MARQUES et al. 2004) and
our (probably) accidental recordings cannot indicate a different preference under the Crimean
conditions (Figs. 1, 3).
Anyway, although the occurrence of the European free-tailed bat, Tadarida teniotis, in south-
ern Crimea is very likely, it should be verified by further field studies and by catching of an
122
individual. An eventual genetic analysis of such specimen could indicate its geographic origin,
i.e. from a Caucasian, Turkish, Balkan or indigenous population, and also elucidate our records
as well as the JENTINK’s (1888) finding.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank our wives, Zdeňka BENDOVÁ and Janina GAZARYAN, for their patience and for logistic support
in the field. Wea are grateful to Dieter KOCK (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) and Peter KAŇUCH (Zvolen,
Slovakia) for providing us with literature. For consultations of the bat recordings we thank Danilo RUS-
SO (Napoli, Italy), Radek LUČAN (Praha, Czech Republic), Tomáš BARTONIČKA (Brno, Czech Republic)
and Martin CEĽUCH (Bardejov, Slovakia). The field work was supported by grants of the Czech Science
Foundation (# 206/02/0888), the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic (# MK00002327201) and the
Russian Fund for Basic Research (# 07-04-01215).
SÚHRN
Dosiaľ jediným publikovaným údajom o výskyte Tadarida teniotis na Kryme (Ukrajina) bol údaj JENTIN-
KA (1888), ktorý v katalógu svojho múzea uvádza aj jedinca Nyctinomus cestonii [= Tadarida teniotis]
s poznámkou “Femelle semi-adulte. La Crimée.”. Kým viacerí autori zo západnej Európy považovali
výskyt T. teniotis na Kryme za reálny a bez pochybností (napr. LANZA 1959, AELLEN 1966, KOCK & NADER
1984, IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004), SATUNIN (1914) a OGNEV (1927, 1928) údaj spochybňovali a výskyt T.
teniotis v oblasti sa nespomína v žiadnej inej práci ukrajinských alebo ruských autorov (napr. BRAUNER”
1912, KUZÂKIN 1950, 1965, ABELÈNCEV & POPOV 1956, STRELKOV 1962, 1981, DULICKIJ 1974, 2001a, b,
KONSTANTINOV et al. 1976, ORLOV 1984, BORISENKO & PAVLINOV 1995, ZAGORODNÛK & GODLEVS’KA 2001,
DULICKIJ & KOVALENKO 2003, ŠEVČENKO & ZOLOTUHINA 2005, GODLEVSKAÂ et al. 2009, atď.). V príspevku
sa opisujú a diskutujú echolokačné signály netopierov zaznamenané detektormi a neskôr po akustickej
analýze identifikované ako signály Tadarida teniotis. Signály boli nahrané v hornatej a prevažne lesnatej
časti polostrova Krym v septembri 2009 na dvoch lokalitách (Pčelinoe, okres Belogorsk a Partizanskoe,
o. Jalta). Kým signály nahrané u Partizanskeho majú atypické parametre, signály z Pčelineho svojimi
parametrami plne zodpovedajú charakteristikám zaznamenaným u T. teniotis v rôznych častiach jej areálu
(napr. ZBINDEN & ZINGG 1986, ZINGG 1990, RUSSO & JONES 2002, OBRIST et al. 2004, ULANOVSKY et al.
2004, BENDA et al. 2006, 2008, BAYEFSKY-ANAND et al. 2008) a postačujú na druhovú identifikáciu. Keďže
prezentované údaje predstavujú prvý údaj o výskyte T. teniotis na Kryme po 120 rokoch od publikovania
jediného údaju, výskyt druhu je v budúcnosti potrebné overiť aj odchytom netopiera samotného.
РЕЗЮМЕ
До настоящего времени единственным опубликованным свидетельством обитания широкоухого
складчатогуба (Tadarida teniotis) в Крыму было указание Eнтинка (JENTINK 1888), который
среди восьми экземпляров Nyctinomus cestonii [= T. teniotis] из Далматии и Египта описывает
один экземпляр с примечанием “Femelle semi-adulte. La Crimée” [самка полувзрослая, Крым].
Западноевропейские авторы признают реальность данной находки без каких-либо оговорок
(напр., LANZA 1959, AELLEN 1966, KOCK & NADER 1984, IBÁÑEZ & PÉREZ-JORDÁ 2004). В то же время,
кроме САТУНИНА (SATUNIN 1914) и ОГНЕВА (OGNEV 1927, 1928), другие украинские и российские
исследователи не указывают на обитание Tadarida teniotis в Крыму (напр. BRAUNER” 1912, KUZÂKIN
1950, 1965, ABELÈNCEV & POPOV 1956, STRELKOV 1962, 1981, DULICKIJ 1974, 2001a, b, KONSTANTINOV et
al. 1976, ORLOV 1984, BORISENKO & PAVLINOV 1995, ZAGORODNÛK & GODLEVS’KA 2001, DULICKIJ & KOVA-
LENKO 2003, ŠEVČENKO & ZOLOTUHINA 2005, GODLEVSKAÂ et al. 2009, и др.). В представленной работе
описываются и обсуждаются эхолокационные сигналы, зарегистрированные с помощью детекторов
ультразвука, которые по результатам акустического анализа, могут принадлежать T. teniotis. Сигналы
123
были записаны в сентябре 2009 года, в двух точках в лесном поясе горного Крыма (с. Пчелиное в
окр. пос. Белогорск и над р. Авунда в окр. пос. Партизанское неподалеку от г. Ялта). Хотя сигналы
из окр. пос. Партизанское имеют нетипичную для T. teniotis структуру, сигналы из Пчелиного по
своим параметрам полностью соответствуют описанным из других частей ареала (ZBINDEN & ZINGG
1986, ZINGG 1990, RUSSO & JONES 2002, OBRIST et al. 2004, ULANOVSKY et al. 2004, BENDA et al. 2006,
2008, BAYEFSKY-ANAND et al. 2008) и не могут быть отнесены к другим видам рукокрылых. В то же
время, приведенное спустя 120 лет после первой находки новое свидетельство обитания T. teniotis
в Крыму должно быть подтверждено поимкой хотя бы одного животного.
REFERENCES
ABELÈNCEV V. I. & POPOV B. M., 1956: Ряд рукокрилі, або кажани. Chiroptera [Order bats. Chiroptera].
Pp.: 229–446. In: ABELÈNCEV V. I., PIDOPLIČKO I. G. & POPOV B. M. (eds.): Фауна України. Том I. Ссавці.
Випуск 1. Загальна характеристика ссавців. Комахоїдні, кажани [Fauna of Ukaine. Volume I.
Mammals. Number 1. Basic Characterisation of Mammals. Insectivores, Bats]. Vydavnyctvo Akademii
nauk Ukrainskoj RSR, Kyiv, 448 pp (in Ukrainian).
AELLEN V., 1966: Notes sur Tadarida teniotis (Raf.) (Mammalia, Chiroptera). I. Systématique, paléontologie
et peuplement, répartition géographique. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 73: 119–159.
AHLÉN I., 1990: Identification of Bats in Flight. Swedish Society for Conservation of Nature, The Swedish
Youth Association for Environmental Studies and Conservation, Stockholm, 50 pp.
AHLÉN I., 2004: Heterodyne and time-expansion methods for identification of bats in the field and through
sound analysis. Pp.: 72–79. In: BRIGHAM R. M., KALKO E. K. V., JONES G., PARSONS S. & LIMPENS H. J. G.
A. (eds.): Bat Echolocation Reserach: Tools, Techniques and Analysis. Bat Conservation International,
Austin Texas, 82 pp.
AHLÉN I. & BAAGØE H. J., 1999: Use of ultrasound detectors for bat studies in Europe: experiences from
field identification, surveys, and monitoring. Acta Chiropterologica, 1: 137–150.
ANONYMUS [= MÜLLER E.], 1992: Fund einer Bulldogfledermaus in Stuttgart. Der Flattermann, Regional-
beilage für Baden-Württemberg, 8: 10.
ANONYMUS, HM [= HAFFNER M.], 1993: Willy aus dem Sack. Der Südländer, der aus dem Norden kam.
Fledermaus-Anzeiger, März 1993: 7–8.
ARLETTAZ R., 1990: Contribution à l’éco-éthologie du molosse de Cestoni, Tadarida teniotis (Chiroptera),
dans les Alpes valaisannes (sud-ouest de la Suisse). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 55: 28–42.
AULAGNIER S., HAFFNER P., MITCHELL-JONES A. J., MOUTOU F. & ZIMA J., 2008: Guide des Mammifères
d’Europe, d’Afrique du Nord et du Moyen-Orient. Delachaux et Nestlé, Paris, 271 pp.
BARATAUD M., 1996: The World of Bats. Acoustic Identification of French Bats. Sitelle, Mens, 47 pp + CD
ROM.
BAYEFSKY-ANAND S., SKOWRONSKI M. D., FENTON M. B., KORINE C. & HOLDERIED M. W., 2008: Variation in
the echolocation calls of the European free-tailed bat. Journal of Zoology, London, 275: 115–123.
BENDA P. & HORÁČEK I., 1998: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean. Part 1. Review
of distribution and taxonomy of bats in Turkey. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 62: 255–313.
BENDA P., IVANOVA T., HORÁČEK I., HANÁK V., ČERVENÝ J., GAISLER J., GUEORGUIEVA A., PETROV B. & VOHRALÍK
V., 2003: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean. Part 3. Review of bat distribution
in Bulgaria. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 67: 245–357.
BENDA P., ANDREAS M., KOCK D., LUČAN R., MUNCLINGER P., NOVÁ P., OBUCH J., OCHMAN K., REITER A., UHRIN
M. & WEINFURTOVÁ D., 2006: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean. Part 4. Bat
fauna of Syria: distribution, systematics, ecology. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 70: 1–329.
BENDA P., HANÁK V., HORÁČEK I., HULVA P., LUČAN R. & RUEDI M., 2007: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
of the Eastern Mediterranean. Part 5. Bat fauna of Cyprus: review of records with confirmation of six
species new for the island and description of a new subspecies. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae,
71: 71–130.
124
BENDA P., DIETZ C., ANDREAS M., HOTOVÝ J., LUČAN R. K., MALTBY A., MEAKIN K., TRUSCOTT J. & VALLO
P., 2008: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Part 6. Bats of
Sinai (Egypt) with some taxonomic, ecological and echolocation data on that fauna. Acta Societatis
Zoologicae Bohemicae, 72: 1–103.
BENDA P., GEORGIAKAKIS P., DIETZ C., HANÁK V., GALANAKI K., MARKANTONATOU V., CHUDÁRKOVÁ A., HULVA
P. & HORÁČEK I., 2009: Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East.
Part 7. The bat fauna of Crete, Greece. Acta Societatis Zoologicae Bohemicae, 72: 105–190.
BLONDEL J. & ARONSON J., 1999: Biology and Wildlife of the Mediterranean Region. Oxford University
Press, Oxford, 328 pp.
BORISENKO A. V. & PAVLINOV I. Â., 1995: Подотряд Microchiroptera [Sub-Order Microchiroptera]. Pp.:
72–120. In: PAVLINOV I. Â., BORISENKO A. V., KRUSKOP S. V. & ÂHONTOV E. L. (eds.): Млекопитающие
Евразии. II. Non-Rodentia. Систематико-географический справочник [Mammals of Euroasia. II.
Non-Rodentia. Systematical-geographical review]. Sbornik Trudov Zoologičeskogo Muzeja MGU, 23:
1–334 (in Russian).
BRAUNER” A. A, 1912. Летучія мыши Крыма [Die Fledermäuse der Krim]. Zapisky Krymskogo Obŝe-
stva Estestvoispytatelej i Lûbitelej Prirody [Simferopol’], 1[1911]: 1–13 (in Russian, with a German
summary).
CIECHANOWSKI M., SACHANOWICZ K., RACHWALD A. & BENDA P., 2005: First records of Tadarida teniotis
(Rafinesque, 1814) (Chiroptera, Molossidae) from Serbia and Montenegro and from Bosnia and Her-
zegovina. Mammalia, 69: 257–260.
CORBET G. B., 1978: The Mammals of the Palaearctic Region: a Taxonomic Review. British Museum
(Natural History) & Cornell University Press, London & Ithaca, 314 pp.
DIETZ C., VON HELVERSEN O. & NILL D., 2007: Handbuch der Fledermäuse Europas und Nordwestafrikas.
Biologie – Kennzeichen – Gefährdung. Franckh-Kosmos Verlags GmBH, Stuttgart, 400 pp.
DOBSON G. B., 1878: Catalogue of the Chiroptera in the Collection of the British Museum. British Mu-
seum, London, 567 pp.
DULICKIJ A. I., 1974: Численность и проблемы охраны рукокрылых в Крыму [Abundance and problems
of protection of bats in Crimea]. Pp.: 63–67. In: STRELKOV P. P. & K UZÂKIN A. P. (eds.): Материалы
первого всесоюзного совещания порукокрылым (Chiroptera) [Materials from the First Pan-Union
Conference on Bats (Chiroptera)]. Zoologičeskij Institut AN SSSR, Leningrad, 182 pp (in Russian).
DULICKIJ A. I., 2001a: Млекопитающие Крыма [Mammals of Crimea]. Krymskoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe
gosudarsvennoe izdatel’stvo, Simferopol’, 224 pp (in Russian).
DULICKIJ A. I., 2001b: Биоразнообразие Крыма. Млекопитающие. История, состояние, охрана,
перспективы [Biodiversity of Crimea. Mammals. History, Status, Protection, Perspectives]. Sonat,
Simferopol’, 208 pp (in Russian).
DULICKIJ A. I. & KOVALENKO I. S., 2003: Материалы по рукокрылым Крыма в зоологических собраниях
Украины и России [Materials on Crimean bats in zoological collections of Ukraine and Russia]. Voprosy
Razvitiâ Kryma, 15: 197–210 (in Russian).
GAZARÂN S. V. & TEMBOTOVA F. A., 2007: Новые находки рукокрылых на Центральном Кавказе [New
findings of bats from the Central Caucasus Mts.]. Zoologičeskij Žurnal, 86(6): 761–762 (in Russian,
with a summary in English).
GODLEVSKAÂ E. V., 2003: Сведения о рукокрылых Керченского полуострова (Крым) [Data on bats of
the Kerch Peninsula (Crimea)]. Plecotus et al., 6: 29–36 (in Russian, with a summary in English).
GODLEVSKAÂ E. V., GHAZALI M. A. & POSTAWA Т., 2009: Современное состояние троглофильных видов
рукокрылых (Chiroptera) Крыма [Current status of the cave dwelling bat species (Mammalia, Chirop-
tera) of Crimea]. Vestnik Zoologii, 43(3): 253–265 (in Russian, with an abstract in English).
GRIMMBERGER E., RUDLOFF K. & KERN C., 2009: Atlas der Säugetiere Europas, Nordafrikas und Vordera-
siens. Natur und Tier, Münster, 495 pp.
HARRISON D. L. & BATES P. J. J. 1991: The Mammals of Arabia. Second Edition. Harrison Zoological
Museum, Sevenoaks, xvi+354 pp.
125
VON HELVERSEN O. & VON HELVERSEN D., 1994: The “advertisement song” of the lesser noctule bat (Nyctalus
leisleri). Folia Zoologica, 43: 331–338.
HORÁČEK I., HANÁK V. & GAISLER J., 2000: Bats of the Palearctic region: a taxonomic and biogeographic
review. Pp.: 11–157. In: WOŁOSZYN B. W. (ed.): Proceedings of the VIIIth European Bat Research
Symposium. Vo l. I. Approaches to Biogeography and Ecology of Bats. Chiropterological Information
Center, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals PAS, Kraków, 280 pp.
HORÁČEK I., BENDA P., SADEK R., KARKABI S., ABI-SAID M., LUČAN R., HULVA P. & KARANOUH R., 2008:
Bats of Lebanon. State of knowledge and perspectives. Al-Ouat’Ouate, Revue Libanaise de Speleologie
et de Karstologie, n. s., 14: 52–67.
IBÁÑEZ C. & PÉREZ-JORDÁ J. L., 2004: Tadarida teniotis (Rafinesque, 1814) – Europäische Bulldoggfle-
dermaus. Pp.: 1125–1143. In: KRAPP F. (ed.): Handbuch der Säugetiere Europas. Band 4: Flederti-
ere. Teil II: Chiroptera II. Vespertilionidae 2, Molossidae, Nycteridae. Aula-Verlag, Wiebelsheim,
x+605–1186 pp.
JENTINK F. A., 1888: Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Pays-Bas. Tome XII. Catalogue Systématique des Mam-
mifères (Rongeurs, Insectivores, Cheiroptères, Édentés et Marsupiaux). E. J. Brill, Leide, 280 pp.
KOCK D. & NADER I. A., 1984: Tadarida teniotis (Rafinesque, 1814) in the W-Palaearctic and a lectotype
for Dysopes rupelii Temminck, 1826 (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 49:
129–135.
KONSTANTINOV A. I., VŠIVKOV F. I. & DULICKIJ A. I., 1976: Современное состояние фауны рукокрылых
Крыма [Modern state of the bat fauna in Crimea]. Zoologičeskij Žurnal, 55(6): 885–893 (in Russian,
with a summary in English).
KORNEEV O. P. & MARISOVA I. V., 1950: Новая находка в СССР широкоухого складчатогуба [New
record of European free-tailed bat in the USSR]. Naukovye Zapisky Кievskogo Gosudarstvennogo
Universiteta, 9(6): 159–160 (in Russian).
KUZÂKIN A. P., 1950: Летучие мыши (Систематика, образ жизни и польза для сельского и лесного
хозяйства) [Bats (Systematics, Life History and Benefit for Agriculture and Forestry)]. Sovetskaâ
Nauka, Moskva, 444 pp (in Russian).
KUZÂKIN A. P., 1965: Отряд рукокрылые. Ordo Chiroptera [Order Bats. Ordo Chiroptera]. Pp.: 79–116.
In: BOBRINSKIJ N. A., KUZNECOV B. A. & KUZÂKIN A. P. (eds.): Определитель млекопитающих СССР
[Key to Identification of Mammals of the USSR]. Prosveŝenie, Moskva, 384 pp (in Russian).
LANZA B., 1959: III. Chiroptera Blumenbach, 1774. Pp.: 187–473. In: TOSCHI A. & LANZA B. (eds.): Fau-
na d’Italia. Mammalia. Generalità – Insectivora – Chiroptera. Edizioni Calderini Bologna, Bologna,
488 pp.
MARQUES T. J., RAINHO A., CARAPUÇO M., OLIVEIRA P. & PALMEIRIM J. M., 2004: Foraging behaviour and
habitat use by the European free-tailed bat Tadarida teniotis. Acta Chiropterologica, 6: 99–110.
OBRIST M. K., BOESCH R. & FLÜCKIGER P. F., 2004: Variability in echolocation call design of 26 Swiss bat
species: consequences, limits and options for automated field identification with a synergetic pattern
recognition approach. Mammalia, 68: 307–322.
OGNEV S. I., 1927: A synopsis of the Russian bats. Journal of Mammalogy, 8: 140–157.
OGNEV S. I., 1928: Звери Восточной Европы и Cеверной Азии. Том I [The Mammals of Eastern Euro-
pe and of Northern Asia. Volume I]. Gosudarstvennoe Izdatel’stvo, Moskva & Leningrad, 631 pp (in
Russian).
ORLOV V. A., 1984: Широкоухий складчатогуб. Tadarida teniotis Rafinesque, 1814 [European free-tailed
bat. Tadarida teniotis Rafinesque, 1814]. Pp.: 18–18. In: BORODIN A. M., BANNIKOV A. G., SOKOLOV V. E.,
V
ASIL’EV N. G., VINOGRADOV V. N., GILJAROV M. S., GORLENKO M. V., ŽIRNOV L. V., ZEMSKIJ V. A., KRYVDA S.
A., MAKSIMOV L. V., SKARLATO O. A., TAHTADŽÂN A. L., TIHOMIROV A. L., FLINT V. E., ÂBLOKOV A. V. & ÂZAN
Û. P. (eds.): Красная книга СССР. Редкие и находящиеся под угрозой исчезновения виды животных
и растений. Издание второе, переработанное и дополненное. Том первый [Red Data Book of the
USSR. Rare and Situated Under a Threat of Extinction Species of Animals and Plants. Second, Revised
and Complemented Edition. First Volume]. Lesnaâ promyšlenost’, Moskva, 392 pp (in Russian).
126
PETRUŠENKO Â., 2001: Літня активність кажанів у печерах Криму: печери як місця водопою [Summer
activity of bats in caves of Crimea: caves as watering places]. Vestnik Zoologii, 35(5): 92 (in Ukrainian,
with a subtitle in English).
PFALZER G. & KUSCH J., 2003: Structure and variability of bat social calls: implications for specificity and
individual recognition. Journal of Zoology, London, 261: 21–33.
RAGGE D. R. & REYNOLDS W. J., 1998: The Songs of the Grasshoppers and Crickets of Western Europe.
Harley Books, Essex, 612 pp.
RUSSO D. & JONES G., 2002: Identification of twenty-two bat species (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Italy
by analysis of time-expanded recordings of echolocation calls. Journal of Zoology, London, 258:
91–103.
RUSSO D. & JONES G., 2003: Use of foraging habitats by bats in a Mediterranean area determined by
acoustic surveys conservation implications. Ecography, 26(2): 197–209.
RYDELL J., 1993: Eptesicus nilssonii. Mammalian Species, 430: 1–7.
SATUNIN K. A., 1914: Oпределитель млекопитающихъ Россiйской Имперiи. Выпускъ первый.
Рукокрылыя, Насекомоядныя и Хищныя [Key to Identification of Mammals of the Russian Empire.
First Volume ( Bats, Insectivores and Carnivors)]. Tipografiâ Kancelârii Namestnika E. I. V. na Kavkaze,
Tiflis”, 148 pp (in Russian).
SCHNEIDER G., 1871: Dysopes Cestonii in Basel, eine für die Schweiz neue Fledermaus. Beitrag zur Kennt-
niss dieser Art. Neue Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft, Zürich, 24:
1–9 (non vidi, ex AELLEN 1966).
SEDLAG U. & WEINERT E. (eds.), 1987: Biogeographie, Artbildung, Evolution. Wörterbücher der Biologie.
Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, 329 pp.
ŠEVČENKO L. S. & ZOLOTUHINA S. I., 2005: Каталог коллекций Зоологического музея ННПМ НАН
Украины. Млекопитающие. Вып. 2. Насекомоядные (Insectivora), Рукокрылые (Chiroptera),
Зайцеобразные (Lagomorpha), Грызуны (Rodentia) [Catalogue of the Zoological Museum of the
National Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Science of Ukraine. Vo l . 2. Insectivors
(Insectivora), Bats (Chiroptera), Lagomorphs (Lagomorpha), Rodents (Rodetia)]. Zoomuzej NNPM
NAN Ukrainy, Kiev, 239 pp (in Russian, with an abstract in English).
STRELKOV P. P. 1963: II. Отряд Chiroptera – Рукокрылые [II. Order Chiroptera – bats]. Pp.: 122–218. In:
SOKOLOV I. I. (ed.): Млекопитающие фауны СССР. Часть 1 [Mammals of the Fauna of the USSR.
Part 1]. Izdatel’stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, Moskva & Leningrad, 640 pp (in Russian).
STRELKOV P. P. 1981: Отряд Chiroptera Blumenbach, 1779 – Рукокрылые [Order Chiroptera Blumen-
bach, 1779 – Bats]. Pp.: 31–53. In: GROMOV I. M. & BARANOVA G. I. (eds.): Каталог млекопитающих
СССР. Плиоцен–современность [Catalogue of Mammals of the USSR. Pliocene–Recent]. Leningrad:
Nauka, 456 pp (in Russian).
TEMBOTOV A. K. & ŠABAEV M. I., 1962: Новый вид рукокрылых фауны Кабардино-Балкарии [New
species of bats in the fauna of Kabardino-Balkaria]. Učenye Zapisky Kabardino-Balkarskogo Univer-
siteta, 14: 124 (in Russian).
ULANOVSKY N., FENTON M. B., TSOAR A. & KORINE C., 2004: Dynamics of jamming avoidance in echolo-
cating bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, Biological Sciences, 271: 1467–1475.
ZAGORODNÛK I. & GODLEVS’KA L., 2001: Кажани в колекціях зоологічних музеїв України: фенологічний
огляд даних [Bats from the collections of zoological museums of Ukraine: phenological review of the
data]. Pp.: 122–156. In: ZAGORODNÛK I. (ed.): Міграційний статус кажанів в Україні [Migration
Status of Bats in Ukraine]. Novitates Theriologicae, Pars 6. Ukrains’ke teriologične tovaristvo, Kyiv,
172 pp (in Ukrainian, with an abstract in English).
ZBINDEN K. & ZINGG P. E., 1986: Search and hunting signals of echolocating European free-tailed bats,
Tadarida teniotis, in southern Switzerland. Mammalia, 50: 9–25.
ZINGG P. E., 1990: Akustische Artidentifikation von Fledermäusen (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in der Schweiz.
Revue Suisse Zoologique, 97: 263–294.