ArticlePDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Changes in the state of energy balance owing to changes in physical activity may affect the reproductive system. We evaluated the association between physical activity (PA) and fertility and parity in healthy women. A population-based health survey (HUNT 1) was conducted during 1984-1986 in Nord-Trøndelag county, Norway, with follow-up from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The study included 3887 women, <45 years old in HUNT 2. PA was assessed by baseline questionnaire, and fertility and parity by questionnaire at follow-up. Data focused on overall occurrence of infertility in the population (without biological confirmation). Increased frequency, duration and intensity of PA were associated with increased subfertility, and frequency of PA was associated with voluntary childlessness (P < 0.01). After adjusting for age, parity, smoking, and marital status, women who were active on most days were 3.2 times more likely to have fertility problems than inactive women. Exercising to exhaustion was associated with 2.3 times the odds of fertility problems versus low intensity. Women with highest intensity of PA at baseline had the lowest frequency of continuing nulliparity and highest frequency of having three or more children during follow-up (P < 0.05). Sensitivity analysis including body mass index as confounder did not alter the results. No associations were found between lower activity levels and fertility or parity. Increased risk of infertility was only found for the small group of women reporting the highest levels of intensity and frequency of PA. Awareness of the possible risks of infertility should be highlighted among non-athletic women who exercise vigorously.
Content may be subject to copyright.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Reproductive epidemiology
Physical activity and fertility in women:
the North-Trøndelag Health Study
S.L. Gudmundsdottir1, W.D. Flanders2, and L.B. Augestad1,3
Human Movement Science Programme, Faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and
Technology (NTNU), NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway
Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta,
GA 30345, USA
Correspondence address. Tel: þ47 7359-1780; Fax: þ47 7359-1770; E-mail:
background: Changes in the state of energy balance owing to changes in physical activity may affect the reproductive system. We
evaluated the association between physical activity (PA) and fertility and parity in healthy women.
methods: A population-based health survey (HUNT 1) was conducted during 1984– 1986 in Nord-Trøndelag county, Norway, with
follow-up from 1995 to 1997 (HUNT 2). The study included 3887 women, ,45 years old in HUNT 2. PA was assessed by baseline ques-
tionnaire, and fertility and parity by questionnaire at follow-up. Data focused on overall occurrence of infertility in the population (without
biological confirmation).
results: Increased frequency, duration and intensity of PA were associated with increased subfertility, and frequency of PA was associ-
ated with voluntary childlessness (P,0.01). After adjusting for age, parity, smoking, and marital status, women who were active on most
days were 3.2 times more likely to have fertility problems than inactive women. Exercising to exhaustion was associated with 2.3 times the
odds of fertility problems versus low intensity. Women with highest intensity of PA at baseline had the lowest frequency of continuing nulli-
parity and highest frequency of having three or more children during follow-up (P,0.05). Sensitivity analysis including body mass index as
confounder did not alter the results. No associations were found between lower activity levels and fertility or parity.
conclusion: Increased risk of infertility was only found for the small group of women reporting the highest levels of intensity and fre-
quency of PA. Awareness of the possible risks of infertility should be highlighted among non-athletic women who exercise vigorously.
Key words: epidemiology / exercise / infertility / physical activity / women
Infertility is defined as the inability of a couple to conceive within
1 year of trying to become pregnant (Kumar et al., 2007). Recent
estimates of the prevalence of infertility range from 3.5 to 16.7% in
more developed nations and from 6.9 to 9.3% in less developed
nations (Boivin et al., 2007). In Norway, the lifetime infertility preva-
lence has been estimated to be 6.6% (Rostad et al., 2006).
A variety of lifestyle factors, such as smoking (Hughes and Brennan
1996; Augood et al., 1998; Hull et al., 2000), psychological stress
(Hjollund et al., 1999), caffeine (Wilcox et al., 1988) and alcohol con-
sumption (Gill, 2000; Eggert et al., 2004) and extremely low or high
body mass index (BMI) (Rich-Edwards et al., 2002; Hassan and
Killick 2004; Norman et al., 2004) have been proposed as causes of
infertility. Consequences of infertility may include psychosocial pro-
blems (Greil, 1997; Boivin, 2003), higher risks of breast and ovarian
cancer (Jensen et al., 2008) and high financial costs for those trying
infertility treatment (Jain and Hornstein 2003). In addition, childless-
ness has been related to mortality disadvantages (Grundy and
Kravdal, 2008). It is suggested that one-third of the incidences of
couple infertility can be related to male reproductive problems
(Meacham et al., 2007).
Reproductive dysfunction is reported to have a higher prevalence in
athletes than non-athletes (Russell et al., 1984; Otis et al., 1997), with
clinical consequences that may include infertility (Warren et al.,
2001). Less is known about the effects of physical activity (PA) on
female fertility in the general population, in contrast to the relatively
well-known beneficial effects of regular PA for numerous undesirable
health outcomes, including the prevention of premature death
(Bouchard and Blair 1999; Warburton et al., 2006). Only a few
studies have focused on the general population. In a cohort study, the
Nurses’ Health Study II, more hours of vigorous exercise were associ-
ated with reduced risk of ovulatory infertility (Rich-Edwards et al., 2002;
Chavarro et al., 2007) while Morris et al. (2006) found that women who
had enrolled on a fertility treatment programme and reported exercis-
ing 4 h or more per week for 1 9 years previously were 40% less likely
to have a live birth, almost three times more likely to experience cycle
cancellation, and twice as likely to have an implantation failure or
&The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved.
For Permissions, please email:
Human Reproduction, Vol.24, No.12 pp. 3196– 3204, 2009
Advanced Access publication on October 3, 2009 doi:10.1093/humrep/dep337
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
pregnancy loss than women who had reported not exercising. More
moderate exercise together with weight loss has been found to be posi-
tive in fertility treatment in obese women (Clark et al., 1995). The effect
of PA on fertility may therefore be positive up to a certain level and have
a negative effect above that threshold level of activity. A similar pattern is
suggested for bone health: physically active individuals have been found
to have a lower risk of low bone mineral density and fractures, while the
risk of stress fractures is increased with high-volume training (Kohrt
et al., 2004). This may occur through the direct effects of activity on hor-
mones which stimulate bone formation or indirectly via effects on estro-
gen and menstrual function, a condition often coupled with negative
energy availability in an interrelationship known as the female athlete
triad (Nattiv et al., 2007).
PA plays an important role in maintaining energy balance and it has
been suggested that changes in the status of energy balance due to
changes in PA may affect the reproductive system (Redman, 2006).
In addition, there are some indications that weight loss via PA may
protect ovarian function by increasing insulin resistance and changing
the hormone profile (Norman et al., 2004).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between PA
and fertility status and parity in healthy, premenopausal, Norwegian
All residents in the county of Nord-Trøndelag, Norway, men and women
aged 20 years, were invited to participate in the Nord-Trøndelag Health
Study in 1984–1986 (HUNT 1) and in the follow-up study in 1995–1997
(HUNT 2).
Among those eligible for HUNT 1, 77 310 (90.8%) returned a
health-related questionnaire and 74 977 (88.1%) participated in the
health examination. At the examination, participants filled out a second
questionnaire, including questions regarding PA.
In HUNT 2, 71.3% of the original cohort from HUNT 1 participated. Par-
ticipants were sent a comprehensive health-related questionnaire by mail.
Assessments at the screening station included measurements of height and
weight. At the examination, participants received a more detailed question-
naire evaluating demographics, medication use, diet, reproductive history,
infertility, menstrual history, history of gynaecological surgery and pregnancy.
In total, 24 837 women participated in both surveys. Of those, 5986
women were ,45 years old at HUNT 2, and therefore considered pre-
menopausal. We excluded women who reported serious conditions or
diagnoses known to affect capability for PA or reproductive function at
baseline, as summarized in Fig. 1, leaving 3887 women in our study.
Weekly frequency, intensity and duration of leisure time PA was
assessed using a self-reported questionnaire in HUNT 1 (http://www.
questionnaires/) (Table I). The questions regarding PA have been vali-
dated for men with good reliability and test and retest validity (Kurtze
et al., 2008). Based on the reported intensity, duration and frequency,
an index of PA was calculated: detailed descriptions are presented in pre-
viously published papers (Augestad et al., 2004; Augestad et al., 2006).
With division at the 33.3th and 66.6th percentiles of the index, leisure
time PA was categorized into low, moderate and high levels. Occupational
PA was assessed by asking the women if they felt physically tired
from occupational work (almost never, seldom, often, almost always).
Age, education, marital status, smoking, and alcohol consumption were
reported at baseline. BMI (kg/m
) was computed from measured height
and weight.
Fertility status and reproductive history were assessed by a self-
reported questionnaire in HUNT 2. Questions included inability to con-
ceive within 1 year of trying (and at what age), parity, age at childbirth(s),
contraceptive use and menstruation and pregnancy status.
We classified women as fertile if they conceived within 1 year of
attempting to become pregnant and gave birth, and infertile if they did
not conceive within 1 year, regardless of any subsequent pregnancies
(Kumar et al., 2007). Infertile women were further classified as
subfertile if the time to pregnancy exceeded 1 year of trying, and as
involuntarily childless if they reported problems with conceiving within
1 year and there had been no childbirth. Voluntarily childlessness was
assumed if neither problems with becoming pregnant nor childbirth
were reported.
Fertility status and parity for different levels of baseline variables were
compared using descriptive and chi-square statistics. We modelled the
probability of fertility problems (subfertility or involuntary childlessness)
using unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression. For infertility, odds
ratio (ORs) estimates were obtained by maximum likelihood with associ-
ated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We were concerned there might be
some link between PA and age and therefore performed subgroup ana-
lyses for young women, ,30 years of age, because of the higher preva-
lence of infertility in this group.
The associations of baseline measurements with parity were examined
in women who were nulliparous in HUNT 1. Comparisons were made
using ordinal regression models, adjusting for potential confounders.
In these analyses parity was treated as a three-level variable: nulliparous,
one to two children and more than two children.
Figure 1 Sequential exclusion of participants in the study of phys-
ical activity and fertility. *No response to questions needed for
Physical activity and fertility 3197
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
Table I Baseline characteristics of the healthy Norwegian female study population
Characteristic nwithin
Fertile, 3511
Subfertile, 197
Involuntary childless,
27 (0.7%)
Voluntary childless,
152 (3.9%)
Age, n
20–25 years 1247 1048 (84.0) 120 (9.6) 13 (1.0) 66 (5.3) 0.000
26–30 years 1632 1502 (92.0) 62 (3.8) 10 (0.6) 58 (3.6)
31–35 years 1008 961 (95.3) 15 (1.5) 4 (0.4) 28 (2.8)
,18.5 151 132 (87.4) 10 (6.6) 1 (0.7) 8 (5.3) 0.001
18.5–24.9 3007 2743 (91.2) 138 (4.6) 24 (0.8) 102 (3.4)
25–29.9 579 511 (88.3) 38 (6.6) 1 (0.2) 29 (5.0)
30.0–34.9 114 98 (86.0) 7 (6.1) 0 9 (7.9)
35.0,31 22 (71.0) 4 (12.9) 1 (3.2) 4 (12.9)
Frequency of PA
Never 272 258 (94.9) 6 (2.2) 1 (0.4) 7 (2.6) 0.000
,1 per week 1252 1144 (91.4) 60 (4.8) 8 (0.6) 40 (3.2)
1 per week 1210 1109 (91.7) 55 (4.5) 9 (0.7) 37 (3.1)
2–3 per week 890 778 (87.4) 50 (5.6) 8 (0.9) 54 (6.1)
Nearly every day 263 222 (84.4) 26 (9.9) 1 (0.4) 14 (5.3)
Intensity of PA
Take it easy 1418 1298 (91.5) 57 (4.0) 8 (0.6) 55 (3.9) 0.000
Lose breath 1363 1215 (89.1) 80 (5.9) 11 (0.8) 57 (4.2)
To exhaustion 94 76 (80.9) 14 (14.9) 0 (0.0) 4 (4.2)
Duration of PA
,15 min 440 403 (91.6) 24 (5.5) 2 (0.5) 11 (2.5) 0.001
15–30 min 937 860 (91.8) 30 (3.2) 5 (0.5) 42 (4.5)
30–60 min 1261 1124 (89.1) 71 (5.6) 12 (1.0) 54 (4.3)
.60 min 305 260 (85.2) 30 (9.8) 0 (0.0) 15 (4.9)
PA index
Low 989 916 (92.6) 38 (3.8) 5 (0.5) 30 (3.0) 0.000
Moderate 968 885 (91.4) 39 (4.0) 7 (0.7) 37 (3.8)
High 880 752 (85.5) 72 (8.2) 7 (0.8) 49 (5.6)
Physically tired from work
Never 432 380 (88.0) 22 (5.1) 3 (0.7) 27 (6.2) 0.097
Seldom 1546 1413 (91.4) 74 (4.8) 11 (0.7) 48 (3.1)
Often 1365 1261 (92.4) 54 (4.0) 5 (0.4) 45 (3.3)
Almost always 268 246 (91.8) 13 (4.9) 2 (0.7) 7 (2.6)
Never 1563 1388 (88.8) 73 (4.7) 12 (0.8) 90 (5.8) 0.001
Former 761 703 (92.4) 37 (4.9) 4 (0.5) 17 (2.2)
Current 1549 1409 (91.0) 85 (5.5) 11 (0.7) 44 (2.8)
Alcohol consumption prev. 14 days
Never 2038 1857 (91.1) 88 (4.3) 80 (3.9) 13 (0.6) 0.170
1–4 times 1746 1560 (89.3) 102 (5.8) 71 (4.1) 13 (0.6)
5–10 times 35 30 (85.7) 4 (11.4) 0 1 (2.9)
.10 times 55 52 (94.5) 2 (3.6) 1 (1.8) 0
Marital status
Unmarried 1352 1056 (78.1) 134 (9.9) 22 (1.6) 140 (10.4) 0.000
Married 2377 2312 (97.3) 53 (2.2) 5 (0.2) 7 (0.3)
97 90 (92.8) 7 (7.2) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
3198 Gudmundsdottir et al.
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
In all of the above analyses, models were run separately for each of the
PA variables (frequency, intensity, duration and index). Full multivariate
models were run at first. Variables were subsequently removed from
the models if their removal did not affect the coefficient estimates of
the remaining variables in the model or the overall significance of the
Based primarily on a priori considerations, we considered the following
baseline measurements as potential confounders: age (5-year categories),
parity, i.e. when assessing the probability of infertility (nulliparous, not nul-
liparous) (Sternfeld et al., 1999; Miller et al., 2002), smoking (never,
former, current), frequency of alcohol consumption during the 14 days
prior to participation in the study (never, 1 4 times, 5–10 times, .10
times) marital status (unmarried, married, previously married) and edu-
cation (,10, 10 12, .12 years).
Women with an unusually high or low BMI tend to have greater risk of
infertility. Because women with high or low BMI may be either less likely or
more likely to be physically active, baseline BMI may be considered a
potential confounder of the relationship between PA and fertility.
However, BMI might also be considered an intermediate variable in that
PA could affect BMI and, in turn, fertility status. We therefore did not
include BMI as an independent variable in the primary (a priori) analyses,
because its inclusion might have biased the estimated association
between PA and fertility status. However, to assess whether inclusion of
BMI affected the estimated association with fertility status, we also con-
ducted additional (sensitivity) analyses that included this variable, treating
it as categorical (World Health Organization categorization of under-,
normal- and overweight, obesity and severe obesity) at baseline. Statistical
significance was set at P,0.05.
The study was approved by the Norwegian Regional Committee for
Ethics in Medical Research and the Norwegian Data Inspectorate and
each subject gave written informed consent prior to participation.
Baseline characteristics and their bivariate relations to fertility status at
follow-up are shown in Table I. The mean baseline age was 27.2 years
(range 20–35) and mean BMI was 22.7 kg/m
(range 14.5–44.1).
Overall, 90.1% of the women were classified as fertile, 5.1% as subfer-
tile, 0.7% as involuntary childless and 3.9% as voluntary childless.
A total of 62.4% of infertile women reported having visited a
medical doctor for fertility problems.
The frequency of subfertility decreased with increased age, as did
voluntary childlessness. The relationships of BMI categories with
subfertility and voluntary and involuntary childlessness were approxi-
mately J-shaped, and subfertility was least common in the normal
weight group (BMI: 18.5–24.9). Based on the univariate analyses,
women classified as fertile were more often married and had less
than 10 years of education. Voluntarily childless women were more
often unmarried, non-smokers, with more than 12 years of education.
Subfertility was least common among married women (Table I).
Increased frequency of PA was associated with increased subfertility
and voluntary childlessness. A similar relationship was observed
between intensity and longer duration of PA and subfertility but less
so with voluntary childlessness. In the unadjusted analyses, a high
level of PA, according to our calculated index, was associated with
increased subfertility and voluntary childlessness. Due to missing
answers however, the PA index could not be calculated for just
over 1000 women. Tiredness from occupational activity was not
found to be associated with fertility status (Table I).
The observed relationships between PA variables and fertility status
followed the same trend as those reported above, after controlling for
suspected confounding factors: age, parity, smoking and marital status
(Table II). Additional control for education and alcohol consumption
did not meaningfully affect the ORs. In particular, women who were
active on most days of the week were 3.2 times more likely to be
infertile than inactive women. Exercising to exhaustion was associated
with 2.3 times the odds of infertility compared with lower levels of
intensity. For duration, there was decreased risk of infertility in
those whose exercise was moderate (16 30 and 3060 min) com-
pared with the shortest duration of less than 15 min. Women who,
according to the index of PA, were highly active had an OR of 1.5
for infertility compared women with low or moderate levels of activity.
The alternative analysis, designed to assess the sensitivity of results
to alternative models, in which we included BMI as a potential con-
founding factor, did not result in notably different parameter esti-
mates, consistent with the small differences in BMI across the
groups in the PA variables.
In a subgroup analysis restricted to women up to 30 years of age in
whom subfertility was more common (6.3%) than in the older age
group (1.5%), we found that these younger women were more
likely than older women to exercise every day, exercise to exhaustion
or exercise for more than 60 min. Among the young women, subfer-
tility was reported by 23.7% of those exercising to the level of exhaus-
tion and by 11.1% of those who reported exercising almost every day.
Table I Continued
Characteristic nwithin
Fertile, 3511
Subfertile, 197
Involuntary childless,
27 (0.7%)
Voluntary childless,
152 (3.9%)
,10 years 1090 1021 (93.7) 33 (3.0) 6 (0.6) 30 (2.8) 0.000
10–12 years 2258 2024 (89.6) 132 (5.8) 15 (0.7) 87 (3.9)
.12 years 510 442 (86.7) 31 (6.1) 5 (1.0) 32 (6.3)
0 786 510 (64.9) 97 (12.3) 27 (3.4) 152 (19.3) 0.000
13095 2995 (96.8) 100 (3.2)
PA, physical activity. Fertility statusbased on self-reported problems with conceiving within 1 year and childbirths at follow-up. P-values indicate results of the Pearson’s chi-square test. n(%).
Physical activity and fertility 3199
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
In this subgroup there was a u-shaped relationship between duration
of exercise and subfertility. Among women who reported ,15 min or
.60 min duration, the frequency of subfertility was 12.6 and 12.4%,
respectively, while 3.9% of women exercising for 16 30 min and
7.0% of those exercising for 30 60 min reported subfertility.
In this subgroup, adjusted logistic analysis showed similar but some-
what stronger relationships than in the study group as a whole. The
OR for infertility was 3.5 (CI: 1.3 9.0) for women who exercised
almost every day and women who exercised to the level of exhaustion
had 3.0 (CI: 1.3 6.0) times the risk of infertility compared with those
taking it easy. The trend between the calculated index of PA, occu-
pational activity or other variables did not differ meaningfully from
patterns observed in the analyses that included all age groups.
Women who were nulliparous at baseline were significantly younger
than women who had given birth (24.0 versus 26.5; P,0.001). They
had higher occurrence of frequent PA, higher intensity and longer dur-
ation of activity (P,0.001 for all). Nulliparous women were less likely
to feel tired from occupational activity. They had higher education at
baseline, and were more likely to be non-smokers and unmarried
than women who had given birth (P,0.001 for all). The two
groups did not differ on baseline BMI.
For women who were nulliparous at baseline, the mean number of
children born between baseline and follow-up investigations was 1.5
(range 0–4). A total of 179 women were still nulliparous at follow-up,
of whom 152 (84.9%) reported voluntary childlessness. In descriptive
analyses of this group, continued nulliparity at follow-up was associ-
ated with greater age and with lower or higher than normal BMI.
Parity during follow-up was also related to education. However, it
should be noted that at baseline, 93.7% of women with ,10 years
education had already given birth (Table I). For women who had
not given birth at baseline, we found similar ORs of infertility as for
the whole sample but the 95% CIs were larger and included 1 in all
instances (data not shown).
Women who reported the highest intensity of PA at baseline had
the lowest frequency of continuing nulliparity and highest frequency
of having three or more children during follow-up (P,0.05). In the
unadjusted analysis, there was also a tendency towards less continuing
nulliparity and higher parity among those women with longer durations
of PA and higher scores on the PA index (Table III).
There was a significant tendency towards higher parity among
women with the highest intensity of PA compared with moderate
intensity in an ordinal regression analysis, adjusting for age and edu-
cation. Women reporting low intensity of activity did not significantly
differ from the high intensity group. The model was subsequently run
including BMI but no meaningful changes to the parameter estimates
were observed. In another subgroup analysis excluding those
women who were voluntarily childless in HUNT 2, although the direc-
tion of this association was the same, the relationship was no longer
significant (P¼0.07).
Frequency of PA or tiredness from occupational activity was not
related to parity.
In this study we examined the association between PA and fertility
status and parity in healthy premenopausal Norwegian women. We
found that women with the highest levels of frequency or intensity
of PA had increased risk of infertility. We did not, however, see a
trend for increased risk of infertility for the submaximal levels of inten-
sity or frequency of PA. Moreover, the highest level of our index of
PA, indicating the total load of exercise, was related to increased like-
lihood of infertility in adjusted analyses. There was decreased risk of
infertility for women reporting moderate duration of activity in our
adjusted analyses, compared with women reporting activity duration
of less than 15 min. Our estimate of 5.8% prevalence of infertility is
somewhat lower than earlier reports from the same study population
in which lifetime infertility prevalence has been estimated to be 6.6%
(Rostad et al., 2006). The women in our sample were younger than in
the Rostad et al. (2006) study and some may still experience infertility
in their remaining reproductive years.
Although we showed that high intensity of PA was related to
increased risk of infertility, there was also a trend of having three or
more children during the follow-up period among women who
reported the highest level of PA intensity at baseline. A possible expla-
nation may be that women who did high intensity training at baseline
and experienced infertility problems adjusted their activity level to a
lower intensity level. Alternatively, although if intense PA had a nega-
tive effect on the first trial for conception, hormonal changes during
and following pregnancy may have counteracted that negative effect
in later pregnancies. The likelihood of fertility problems in our study
was, however, not notably different for nullipara women compared
with those who had already given birth. This may suggest that the
Table II Unadjusted and adjusted ORs from logistic
regression for fertility problems (subfertility or
involuntary childlessness)
PA Unadjusted OR
(95% CI)
Adjusted OR
(95% CI)
Never* 1.0 1.0
,Once a week 2.2 (1.0–4.8) 2.1 (0.9– 4.7)
Once a week 2.1 (1.0– 4.7) 2.0 (0.9– 4.5)
2–3 times a week 2.6 (1.2– 5.9) 2.0 (0.9–4.6)
Almost every day 4.3 (1.9– 10.1) 3.2 (1.3 7.6)
Easy* 1.0 1.0
Sweating and out of breath 1.3 (1.1–1.9) 1.1 (0.8 1.6)
Exhaustion 3.3 (1.8–6.2) 2.3 (1.2. 4.5)
,15 min* 1.0 1.0
16–30 min 0.3 (0.2– 0.6) 0.3 (0.2– 0.5)
30–60 min 0.6 (0.3– 1.0) 0.5 (0.3.– 0.9)
.60 min 0.9 (0.5 1.6) 0.6 (0.3– 1.2)
PA index
Low* 1.0 1.0
Medium 1.0 (0.7–1.7) 0.9 (0.6 1.5)
High 2.1 (1.5– 3.2) 1.5 (1.0– 2.3)
PA, physical activity.
Adjusted for age, parity, smoking and marital status.
*Reference category OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
3200 Gudmundsdottir et al.
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
Table III Baseline characteristics of women who were nulliparous at baseline (n5786)
No childbirth, 179 (22.8) 1–2 children, 458 (58.3) 3 or more children, 149 (19.0) P-value
20–25 years 561 79 (14.1) 358 (63.8) 124 (22.1) 0.000
26–30 years 179 68 (38.0) 88 (49.2) 23 (12.8)
31–35 years 46 32 (69.6) 12 (26.1) 2 (4.3)
,18.5 31 9 (29.0) 16 (51.6) 6 (19.4) 0.005
18.5–24.9 616 126 (20.5) 371 (60.2) 119 (19.3)
25–29.9 113 30 (26.5) 59 (52.2) 24 (21.2)
30.0–34.9 15 9 (60.0) 6 (40.0) 0
35.0,9 5 (55.6) 4 (44.4) 0
Frequency of PA
Never 38 8 (21.1) 27 (71.1) 3 (7.9) 0.668
,1 per week 200 48 (24.0) 114 (57.0) 38 (19.0)
1 per week 216 46 (21.3) 126 (58.3) 44 (20.4)
2–3 per week 255 62 (24.3) 142 (55.7) 51 (20.0)
Nearly every day 77 15 (19.5) 49 (63.6) 13 (16.9)
Intensity of PA
Take it easy 222 63 (28.4) 125 (56.3) 34 (15.3) 0.013
Lose breath 361 68 (18.8) 224 (62.0) 69 (19.1)
To exhaustion 30 4 (13.3) 16 (53.3) 10 (33.3)
Duration of PA
,15 min 67 13 (19.4) 46 (68.7) 8 (11.9) 0.151
15–30 min 187 47 (25.1) 101 (54.0) 39 (20.9)
30–60 min 283 66 (23.3) 169 (59.7) 48 (17.0)
.60 min 97 15 (15.5) 58 (59.8) 24 (24.7)
PA index
Low 131 35 (26.7) 80 (61.1) 16 (12.2) 0.256
Moderate 204 44 (21.6) 121 (59.3) 39 (19.1)
High 276 56 (20.3) 163 (59.1) 57 (20.7)
Physically tired from work
Never 120 30 (25.0) 75 (62.5) 15 (12.5) 0.459
Seldom 242 59 (24.4) 138 (57.0) 45 (18.6)
Often 227 50 (22.0) 130 (57.3) 47 (20.7)
Almost always 47 9 (19.1) 32 (68.1) 6 (12.8)
Never 411 102 (24.8) 220 (53.5) 89 (21.7) 0.030
Former 108 21 (19.4) 64 (59.3) 23 (21.3)
Current 264 55 (20.8) 172 (65.2) 37 (14.0)
Alcohol consumption prev. 14 days
Never 334 93 (27.8) 183 (54.8) 58 (17.4) 0.044
1–4 times 422 84 (19.9) 252 (59.7) 86 (20.4)
5–10 times 15 1 (6.7) 13 (86.7) 1 (6.7)
.10 times 10 1 (10.0) 7 (70.0) 2 (20.0)
Marital status
Unmarried 717 162 (22.6) 417 (58.2) 138 (19.2) 0.500
Married 40 12 (30.0) 21 (52.5) 7 (17.5)
Physical activity and fertility 3201
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
possible detrimental effects of high intensity exercise are reversible
and not permanent. Unfortunately, our data did not allow further con-
sideration of this matter.
There have only been a few studies regarding the effect of PA on fer-
tility status and parity in the general female population. Our results are
somewhat comparable to results of a retrospective case–control study
which found a 6.2-fold increased risk of infertility in women who exer-
cised vigorously (defined as aerobic activities with estimated energy
requirements of 6 kcal/min) for at least 60 min per day (Green et al.,
1986). There are also reports of lutheal phase alterations, which may
lead to infertility, among recreational runners with at least 2 h per
week of exercise and running 32 km/week (De Souza et al., 2003).
The recreational runners in the De Souze study had lower BMI and
fat mass than sedentary controls and the results were related to short-
term negative energy balance and hypometabolic state, similar to but
not as extensive as seen in amenorrheaic athletes.
Results from the Nurse’s Health Study indicate reduced risk of ovu-
latory infertility in women doing vigorous exercise for at least 30 min
daily (Chavarro et al., 2007). An earlier report of the same cohort indi-
cated a 7% relative risk reduction for ovulatory infertility for each
additional hour of vigorous exercise per week (Rich-Edwards et al.,
2002). Thus, there is a considerable divergence in study results. The
mean age in our study group was approximately 5 years lower than
in the women in the Nurse’s Health Study and this may explain the
difference in results to some extent, as we found younger women
more likely to report both highest intensity of PA and infertility than
older ones.
PA can improve body composition, glucose homeostasis and insulin
sensitivity (Warburton et al., 2006). Exercise-induced weight loss has
been shown to improve metabolic function and hormonal profiles, and
often leads to significant increase in fertility (Clark et al., 1995;
Norman et al., 2004). In our study, adjustment for BMI did not signifi-
cantly alter the increased risk of infertility associated with the highest
intensity or frequency of activity. Thus, the effect of PA may largely act
through a mechanism that does not involve BMI to a significant extent.
It is possible that in normal weight women, high loads of exercise,
not coupled with increased energy intake, lead to negative energy
balance where the energy requirements of reproductive functions
cannot be met (Loucks et al., 1998). This may explain our finding of
increased infertility risk among women doing high intensity training
or very frequent exercise sessions.
Our study is population based, not depending on cases seeking help
from a clinic, and can be viewed as a cohort study. The prospective
assessment of the effect of baseline PA on subsequent fertility problems
hopefully contributes to avoiding selection bias of cases and reporting
bias of activity levels. However, there were possible limitations. We
did not try to identify different causes of infertility with biological
testing but focused on the overall occurrence in the population and
this may have biased our results. Green et al. (1986) found that
among infertile women who had never conceived, high intensity exer-
cise for more than 60 min/day was associated with even higher risk
of infertility after excluding cases with evidence of tubal dysfunction.
Differences in measurement methods for infertility may contribute to
differences in results, to some extent. Also, not all women who partici-
pated in the baseline survey did so in the follow-up survey. If non-
participation at follow-up was jointly associated with PA and infertility,
bias may have resulted. Many women did not answer questions regard-
ing fertility status and we cannot exclude the possibility that those
women differed from women who did answer; this could have affected
our results. Our analysis found, however, that women who did not
answer questions regarding fertility status in the follow-up study had
somewhat lower intensity and duration of PA at baseline than women
who did answer those questions, although this difference was not stat-
istically significant. Because data on fertility status were collected retro-
spectively, recall bias may have occurred. Nevertheless, since fertility
status is of high personal interest, precise recollection of its aspects
may be likely. Other sources of bias may have been spousal infertility
and change of partner, which we could not control for in our data.
PA may affect fertility merely temporary or more permanently in
the reproductive life, but our study did not obtain information at
the time when women tried to conceive. Although we excluded
women who reported infertility at baseline we cannot be certain
whether the level of PA reported at baseline was maintained until
trying to conceive.
In epidemiological studies, the intensity of PA can be assessed as
absolute or relative intensity. Metabolic equivalent task is frequently
used to refer to absolute intensity indicating the energy cost of an
activity. PA-related energy expenditure has been associated with mor-
bidity and mortality (Helmrich et al., 1994; Manini et al., 2006; Mora
et al., 2007). Besides being an important determinant of health, data
on energy expenditure also facilitate study result comparisons and
interpretation of findings into meaningful units, although misreporting
errors have been observed (Mahabir et al., 2006). Relative intensity
can be described by use of the Borg scale (Borg, 1982) or other
measures of how intense the exercise is perceived by each subject.
In the current study, information regarding PA was based on a self-
reported questionnaire that allowed for subjective interpretation of
PA variables. It may therefore suffer from misclassification of activity
by factors such as age, social situations and seasonal variation
(Vanhees et al., 2005). Including a large number of study subjects
and classifying subjects into wide categories, e.g. low, moderate,
high score on activity can compensate for the effects of
Table III Continued
No childbirth, 179 (22.8) 1–2 children, 458 (58.3) 3 or more children, 149 (19.0) P-value
,10 years 82 36 (43.9) 39 (47.6) 7 (8.5) 0.000
10–12 years 555 102 (18.4) 341 (61.4) 112 (20.2)
.12 years 140 37 (26.4) 76 (54.3) 27 (19.3)
PA, physical activity. Childbirths during follow-up reported in questionnaire. P-values indicate results of the Pearson’s chi-square test. n(%).
3202 Gudmundsdottir et al.
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
misclassification (Shephard, 2003). The questions regarding intensity
and duration of PA in the current study have previously been validated
in a small sample of women and men over a wide age range (Wisloff
et al., 2006). The results indicate a positive association between
reported intensity and the measures of oxygen uptake during exercise.
Taking it easy corresponded to an intensity of approximately 55% of
the maximal oxygen uptake, independent of activity duration up to
90 min. Intensity descriptions of loosing breath and exercising to the
level of exhaustion corresponded to 71–75 and 76 90%, respect-
ively, of the maximum oxygen uptake. Relative intensity decreased
when duration of exercise was increased. A study of reliability and val-
idity of the questions including only men found good reliability and
kappa statistics of 0.69– 0.82 between test and retest (Kurtze et al.,
2008), although these results are not necessarily valid for women. It
seems likely that any measurement error in the assessment of PA
should not depend on fertility status and would tend to bias results
toward the null. In our study, there were many missing responses
on both PA and fertility. For instance, our PA index could not be cal-
culated for just over 1000 women in our study sample. In summary,
we found that women who were active on most days of the week
had a threefold risk of infertility compared with inactive women.
The increased risk of infertility was only found for the most extreme
intensity and frequency of PA, perhaps representing women who
exercised at levels comparable to elite athletes. While we did not
find any associations between lower levels of activity and fertility
status or parity, other studies have found regular moderate PA to
improve reproductive function. It could therefore be suggested that
moderate PA has little or perhaps even a positive direct effect on fer-
tility. This should undoubtedly be confirmed, as it may possibly affect
fertility by other means than biological, for example via positive effects
on self-esteem and improved mental health. Psychosocial interven-
tions, particularly those emphasizing skills training, such as relaxation
training, have been found effective in infertility treatment (Boivin
2003) and the positive psychological effects of regular PA on mental
well-being have been reported in numerous studies (Scully et al.,
1998; Kull 2002). Results on the association between high levels of
PA and fertility status are conflicting. We found increased risk of infer-
tility in women who reported doing PA almost every day and in those
reporting exercising to the level of exhaustion. Although it cannot be
concluded from this study, it seems likely that fertility may be positively
affected by PA up to a certain level after which the energy require-
ments of the activity outweigh the positive effects, resulting in inferti-
lity. It is also possible that this threshold level applies merely at an
individual level, perhaps in combination with energy availability, and
cannot be identified at the population level.
The potential role of regular PA in the prevention and treatment of
infertility needs further investigation. However, awareness of the poss-
ible risks of infertility should be highlighted among non-athletic women
who exercise vigorously.
The faculty of Social Sciences and Technology Management, The
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) supported
this study by a Doctoral Research Fellowship. The HUNT Study is a
collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine,
Norwegian University of Science and Technology NTNU), Nord-
Trøndelag County Council and The Norwegian Institute of Public
Augestad LB, Schei B, Forsmo S, Langhammer A, Flanders WD. The
association between physical activity and forearm bone mineral
density in healthy premenopausal women. J Womens Health 2004;
Augestad LB, Schei B, Forsmo S, Langhammer A, Flanders WD. Healthy
postmenopausal women—physical activity and forearm bone mineral
density: the Nord-Trondelag health survey. J Women Aging 2006;
Augood C, Duckitt K, Templeton AA. Smoking and female infertility: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1532– 1539.
Boivin J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med
Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of
infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and
demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1506 1512.
Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc
Bouchard C, Blair SN. Introductory comments for the consensus on
physical activity and obesity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999;31:S498 S501.
Chavarro JE, Rich-Edwards JW, Rosner BA, Willett WC. Diet and lifestyle
in the prevention of ovulatory disorder infertility. Obstet Gynecol 2007;
Clark AM, Ledger W, Galletly C, Tomlinson L, Blaney F, Wang X,
Norman RJ. Weight loss results in significant improvement in
pregnancy and ovulation rates in anovulatory obese women. Hum
Reprod 1995;10:2705– 2712.
De Souza MJ, Van Heest J, Demers LM, Lasley BL. Luteal phase deficiency
in recreational runners: evidence for a hypometabolic state. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:337–346.
Eggert J, Theobald H, Engfeldt P. Effects of alcohol consumption on female
fertility during an 18-year period. Fertil Steril 2004;81:379 383.
Gill J. The effects of moderate alchohol consumption on female hormone
levels and reproductive function. Alcohol Alcohol 2000;35:417 423.
Green BB, Daling JR, Weiss NS, Liff JM, Koepsell T. Exercise as a risk factor
for infertility with ovulatory dysfunction. Am J Public Health 1986;
Greil AL. Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the
literature. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1679– 1704.
Grundy E, Kravdal O. Reproductive history and mortality in late middle age
among Norwegian men and women. Am J Epidemiol 2008;
Hassan MA, Killick SR. Negative lifestyle is associated with a significant
reduction in fecundity. Fertil Steril 2004;81:384 392.
Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Prevention of
non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with physical activity. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 1994;26:824–830.
Hjollund NH, Jensen TK, Bonde JP, Henriksen TB, Andersson AM,
Kolstad HA, Ernst E, Giwercman A, Skakkebaek NE, Olsen J et al.
Distress and reduced fertility: a follow-up study of first-pregnancy
planners. Fertil Steril 1999;72:47–53.
Hughes EG, Brennan BG. Does cigarette smoking impair natural or
assisted fecundity? Fertil Steril 1996;66:679–689.
Hull MG, North K, Taylor H, Farrow A, Ford WC, Hull MG, North K,
Taylor H, Farrow A, Ford WC. Delayed conception and active and
passive smoking. The Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and
Childhood Study Team. Fertil Steril 2000;74:725–733.
Physical activity and fertility 3203
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
Jain T, Hornstein MD. To pay or not to pay. Fertil Steril 2003;80:
Jensen A, Sharif H, Olsen JH, Kjaer SK. Risk of breast cancer and
gynecologic cancers in a large population of nearly 50,000 infertile
Danish women. Am J Epidemiol 2008;168:49–57.
Kohrt WM, Bloomfield SA, Little KD, Nelson ME, Yingling VR. American
College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: physical activity and bone
health. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004;36:1985–1996.
Kull M. The relationships between physical activity, health status and
psychological well-being of fertility-aged women. Scand J Med Sci
Sports 2002;12:241–247.
Kumar A, Ghadir S, Eskandari N, DeCherney AH. Infertility. In
DeCherney AH, Nathan L, Goodwin TM, Laufer N (eds)., Current
Diagnosis and Treatment. Obstetrics & Gynecology. New York: McGraw
Hill, 2007.
Kurtze N, Rangul V, Hustvedt BE, Flanders WD. Reliability and validity of
self-reported physical activity in the Nord-Trondelag Health Study:
HUNT 1. Scand J Public Health 2008;36:52–61.
Loucks AB, Verdun M, Heath EM. Low energy availability, not stress of
exercise, alters LH pulsatility in exercising women. J Appl Physiol 1998;
Mahabir S, Baer DJ, Giffen C, Clevidence BA, Campbell WS, Taylor PR,
Hartman TJ. Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from
4 physical activity questionnaires with doubly labeled water estimates
in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr 2006;84:230–236.
Manini TM, Everhart JE, Patel KV, Schoeller DA, Colbert LH, Visser M,
Tylavsky F, Bauer DC, Goodpaster BH, Harris TB. Daily activity
energy expenditure and mortality among older adults. JAMA 2006;
Meacham RB, Joyce GF, Wise M, Kparker A, Niederberger C. Male
infertility. J Urol 2007;177:2058–2066.
Miller YD, Trost SG, Brown WJ. Mediators of physical activity behavior
change among women with young children. Am J Prev Med 2002;
Mora S, Cook N, Buring JE, Ridker PM, Lee IM. Physical activity and
reduced risk of cardiovascular events: potential mediating
mechanisms. Circulation 2007;116:2110– 2118.
Morris SN, Missmer SA, Cramer DW, Powers RD, McShane PM,
Hornstein MD. Effects of lifetime exercise on the outcome of in vitro
fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:938–945.
Nattiv A, Loucks AB, Manore MM, Sanborn CF, Sundgot-Borgen J,
Warren MP. American College of Sports Medicine position stand.
The female athlete triad. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39:
Norman RJ, Noakes M, Wu R, Davies MJ, Moran L, Wang JX. Improving
reproductive performance in overweight/obese women with
effective weight management. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:
Otis CL, Drinkwater B, Johnson M, Loucks A, Wilmore J. American
College of Sports Medicine position stand. The Female Athlete Triad.
Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997;29:i ix.
Redman L. Symposium: diet, nutrition and exercise in reproduction.
Physical activity and its effects on reproduction. Reprod BioMed Online
Rich-Edwards JW, Spiegelman D, Garland M, Hertzmark E, Hunter DJ,
Colditz GA, Willett WC, Wand H, Manson JE. Physical activity, body
mass index, and ovulatory disorder infertility. Epidemiology 2002;
Rostad B, Schei B, Sundby J. Fertility in Norwegian women: results from a
population-based health survey. Scand J Public Health 2006;34:5–10.
Russell JB, Mitchell D, Musey PI, Collins DC. The relationship of exercise
to anovulatory cycles in female athletes: hormonal and physical
characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:452– 456.
Scully D, Kremer J, Meade MM, Graham R, Dudgeon K. Physical exercise
and psychological well being: a critical review. Br J Sports Med 1998;
Shephard RJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by
questionnaires. Br J Sports Med 2003;37:197–206.
Sternfeld B, Ainsworth BE, Quesenberry CP. Physical activity patterns in a
diverse population of women. Prev Med 1999;28:313–323.
Vanhees L, Lefevre J, Philippaerts R, Martens M, Huygens W, Troosters T,
Beunen G. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical
fitness? Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2005;12:102– 114.
Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS, Warburton DER, Nicol CW,
Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ
Warren MP, Perlroth NE, Warren MP, Perlroth NE. The effects of intense
exercise on the female reproductive system. J Endocrinol 2001;
Wilcox A, Weinberg C, Baird D. Caffeinated beverages and decreased
fertility. Lancet 1988;2:1453–1456.
Wisloff U, Nilsen TI, Droyvold WB, Morkved S, Slordahl SA, Vatten LJ. A
single weekly bout of exercise may reduce cardiovascular mortality: how
little pain for cardiac gain? ‘The HUNT study, Norway’. Eur J Cardiovasc
Prev Rehabil 2006;13:798–804.
Submitted on March 13, 2009; resubmitted on August 21, 2009; accepted on
September 1, 2009
3204 Gudmundsdottir et al.
by guest on December 30, 2015 from
... Some randomized controlled trials have reported a therapeutic effect of PA on infertility that acts through systemic effects such as increased immune function, insulin resistance, and circulating sex hormones [20]. However, in contrast to the well-known beneficial effects of regular PA on many adverse health outcomes (including prevention of premature death), the effect of PA on fertility in the general population is unclear [21]. ...
... In one study the authors examined male and female samples separately and analyzed the risk of infertility in PA for men and women [23]. We then ultimately included in the present work 10 studies that yielded 12 different relative risk estimates [3,21,[23][24][25][26][31][32][33][34] (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the principal characteristics of the six cohort studies [3,21,24,26,31,32] and four case-control studies [23,25,33,34] of PA and infertility in our metaanalysis. ...
... We then ultimately included in the present work 10 studies that yielded 12 different relative risk estimates [3,21,[23][24][25][26][31][32][33][34] (Fig. 1). Table 1 shows the principal characteristics of the six cohort studies [3,21,24,26,31,32] and four case-control studies [23,25,33,34] of PA and infertility in our metaanalysis. The studies were conducted in eight countries: two in China [3,31], two in the UK [32,33], and the remaining six in the USA [34], Iran [24], Norway [21], Estonia [26], the Palestinian Territories [25], and France [23]. ...
Full-text available
Background Physical activity (PA) may protect against infertility by modulating the hypothalamic-pituitary–gonadal axis, thereby reducing gonadotropin levels, elevating immune function, and inhibiting inflammation and circulating sex hormones. However, whether PA reduces the risk of infertility remains largely unknown. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the preventive effects of PA on infertility. Methods We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases to retrieve published epidemiologic studies on the relationship between PA and infertility. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we selected English literature publishedprior to 11 April 2022, and assessed study quality using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Our protocol, including the full methods employed for this review, is available on PROSPERO (ID = CRD42020143344). Results Six cohort studies and four case–control studies based on 708,965 subjects and 12,580 cases were eventually screened and retained. High levels of PA were shown to reduced risk of infertility relative to low levels (cumulative relative risk [RR] = 0.59, with a 95% confidence interval CI 0.49–0.71), and we reported results for cohort studies (RR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.50–0.79) and case–control studies (RR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.35–0.67). Our findings were comparable for men (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.41–1.04) and women (RR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47–0.66). The meta-analysis of six risk estimates from five studies of low, moderate, and high PA levels showed that moderate PA may also reduce the risk of infertility compared with low PA (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38–0.77). However, high PA also appeared to slightly augment the risk of infertility compared with moderate PA (RR = 1.31, 95% CI 1.08–1.59). Conclusions This present systematic review comprehensively reflected an inverse relationship between different levels of PA and infertility, and our meta-analysis showed that a moderate-to-high PA level significantly reduced the overall risk of infertility, and that this level of PA activity was a common protective factor. In addition, limited evidence suggested that compliance with international PA guidelines would greatly lower the risk of infertility (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.45–0.74; I ² = 0.0%). Future studies, however, need to be executed to further determine the frequency, optimal dosage, and duration required to effectively attenuate the risk of infertility.
... Fertility, as with other health variables, exhibits an inverted "U" relationship with exercise, indicating there is a certain range that should be minimally met to see a response but there is a limit to when there are diminished returns from the exercise (Clark et al., 1998;Gudmundsdottir et al., 2009;Foucaut et al., 2019;McLean & Wellons, 2012). If a female exercises to an excessive amount, there may be decrements in fertility status depending upon the BMI and current health status of the female. ...
... Similarly, Hakimi et al. (2017) found an increased risk for ovulation problems when a female took part in seven hours or more per week of aerobic exercise while Gaskins et al. (2016) found that strenuous aerobic exercise for four hours or more per week may reduce IVF success. Lastly, Gudmundsdottir et al. (2009) found that there was an increased risk of infertility in women with the highest levels of intensity and frequency of an unspecified mode of physical activity as compared to those with a lower intensity and/or frequency. These studies show that while a lack of exercise increases risk for infertility, there is a threshold volume/intensity of aerobic exercise that will also increase the risk for infertility. ...
... limited, but results have demonstrated an upper limit. Surpassing this upper limit may result in a decreased fertility status (Gudmundsdottir et al., 2009;Hakimi et al., 2016;Wise et al., 2012) Meaning, exercise has a more parabolic, or "inverted-u" relationship with female fertility. Wise et al. (2012) found this relationship to follow suit in an observational study where vigorous exercise for greater than or equal to 5 hours per week caused an increased time to pregnancy (TTP) except in overweight and obese women. ...
Full-text available
Background: Aerobic exercise and its effect on fertility status, as measured by increased
... Most of the studies draw attention to risk of frequent or vigorous PA on fertility [119,120,172] and on success of ART [108,121]. Therefore, exercising 240 minutes or more per week was considered an independent category. ...
... Gudmundsdottir et al. found that women who are active on most days, tended to experience fertility problems 3.2 times more often. In this study exercising to exhaustion also led to 2.3 times more fertility impairments than low intensity PA[172].Based on the data by Morris et al. on lifetime exercise (level of evidence: II-2), exercising 4 hours or more per week indicate 40% less likelihood of having a livebirth (OR 0.6, CI 0.4-0.8), it is 3 times more likely to lead to cycle cancellation, and 2 times more likely to lead to implantation failure or pregnancy loss (OR 2.8, CI 1.5-5.3; OR 2.0, CI 1.4-3.1; ...
Full-text available
We hypothesized that pre-treatment habitual physical activity (PA) would have a positive effect on the overall and infertility-related quality of life (QoL) and reduce psychosocial distress (PSD) levels in ART treatment participants, thereby improving reproductive potential as measured by primary and secondary outcome measures. To assess the effects of psychosocial and lifestyle factors, with a particular focus on physical activity, on the course and success of ART, we conducted an observational cohort study with follow-up of primary and secondary outcome indicators. Our results suggest that infertility-specific scales may provide better information than general scales in terms of PDS and QoL during ART. To our knowledge, the main study of the thesis was the first study in Hungary to provide a detailed description of physical activity patterns in a cohort of women receiving assisted reproductive treatment and the first comparative study using ActriGraph GT3X accelerometer, IPAQ-SFH and GPAQ-H questionnaires in ART. The study demonstrated the relationship between PA patterns and psycho-socio-demographic characteristics and primary and secondary outcome indicators of ART. The ActiGraph GT3X and GPAQ-H can be used as valid measurement tools to map PA patterns of ART participants. We found that the marked difference between objective and subjective measures of PA highlights the need to improve the physical literacy of women undergoing ART therapy. Our results suggest that pre-treatment recreational-type PA can positively influence infertility-related QoL and PSD domains during ART and improve reproductive potential in relation to secondary outcome indicators. Moderate-intensity physical activity may have a positive effect on the number of live births. Differences in response to infertility treatment as a result of PA suggest the development of a specific intervention programme.
... This was in line with the results of Gudmundsdottir's (2009) study entitled "Physical activity and fertility in women: the North-Trøndelag Health Study" explained that women with heavy physical activity increased 2.3 times the incidence of fertility disorders compared to women with mild physical activity. Heavy physical activity can cause the menstrual cycle to prolong, prolong the follicular phase and shorten the luteal phase so that it cannot determine ovulation, resulting in ovulation or anovulation and infertility. ...
... However, a previous study on ovulatory infertility found that a woman's risk of ovulatory infertility decreased with an increase of physical activity (14). Because previous studies have shown that moderate intensity physical activity has little effect on menstrual characteristics, and the health benefits of appropriate physical activity are well-known, some scientists believe that a certain level of physical activity will have a positive impact on fertility, but beyond a certain threshold, this may have a detrimental impact (15). Therefore, our epidemiological understanding of the relationship between the intensity of physical activity and fertility is still very limited. ...
Full-text available
Objective Subfertility is a common problem for couples in modern society. Many studies have confirmed that lifestyle factors can affect fertility although there are conflicting conclusions relating to the effects of physical activity and sleep duration on fertility. In this study, we aimed to summarize and analyze the available evidence. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Embase databases (as of October 14, 2022) were systematically searched for eligible prospective cohort studies. Data were extracted and effect values were combined. We also performed methodological quality and bias risk assessments for all the included studies. Results A total of 10 eligible articles were included in our analysis; seven investigated the relationship between physical activity and fertility, and three investigated the effect of sleep duration on fertility. Compared with the lowest level of physical activity, high intensity physical activity (the highest levels of physical activity) was negatively correlated with fertility [odds ratio (OR) = 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.70, 1.00, I ² = 64%]. However, we did not find an association between moderate intensity physical activity and fertility (OR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.98, 1.22, I ² = 60%). We observed an inverse association between limited sleep duration (≤ 7 h) and fertility (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.00, I ² = 0%) compared with 8 h of sleep. The relationship between long sleep duration (≥9 h) and fertility was not statistically significant (OR = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.60, 1.21, I ² = 83%). According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score, the overall quality of the research articles included was ranked as medium to high (6–9). Through GRADE system, the quality of evidence for the impact of high intensity physical activity and limited sleep duration on fertility was moderate, while the quality of evidence for the impact of moderate intensity physical activity and long sleep duration on fertility was low. Conclusion The current evidence shows that high intensity physical activity and limited sleep time are negatively related to fertility. But there was great heterogeneity among studies, and the quality of research evidence was low to median. Thus, further high-quality research is needed to confirm this conclusion. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022298137.
... Women's physical activity before initiating IVF was associated with higher pregnancy and live birth rates in a meta-analysis of eight studies, and also with a small increase (not statistically significant) in the implantation rate (Rao, Zeng & Tang, 2018). Yet, results from a population health survey comprising 3,887 women under the age of 45 years indicated an association between robust exercise (daily exercise or exercise until extreme tiredness) and subfertility, although no associations were reported with reduced intensity exercise (Gudmundsdottir, Flanders & Augestad, 2009). Also, in a prospective cohort study including 2,232 women, at least 4 h per week of higher intensity exercise for a year or more preceding the IVF cycle was related to greater (2.8fold) odds of cycle cancellation, a 2-fold increase in implantation failure, and a 40% decrease in live births after the first IVF cycle compared to women who did not exercise regularly (Morris et al., 2006). ...
Full-text available
Background Infertility is an important health concern worldwide. Although lifestyle habits and behaviors have been widely reported as predictors of IVF outcomes by previous studies, they have not been reported for Romanian women undergoing IVF. In this regard, our pilot study aimed to begin to address the data gap by assessing lifestyle predictors of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in Romanian women. Study design Our pilot study included 35 participants who completed a first IVF cycle at a single infertility center. We evaluated individual self-reported lifestyle habits and behaviors as predictors of IVF outcomes, and employed principal component analysis (PCA) to characterize multiple lifestyle habits and behaviors into personal care product (PCP) use, and healthy diet and physical activity patterns as predictors of IVF outcomes. Results Our PCA analysis showed that greater use of PCPs was associated with lower probabilities of pregnancy (RR: 0.92, 95% CI [0.87–0.98]) and live birth (RR: 0.94, 95% CI [0.88–1.01]) while, the healthy dietary habits and physical activity were associated with a higher likelihood of pregnancy, although without statistical significance (RR: 1.10, 95% CI [0.93–1.30]). Conclusions In this pilot study we identified associations between IVF outcomes among Romanian women and certain lifestyle habits and behaviors including stress, diet and physical activity, and certain PCP use. We also estimated the joint effects of multiple lifestyle factors using PCA and found that PCP use, healthy dietary habits and physical activity were associated with IVF outcomes.
... The study of Gudmundsdottir et al. measured the effects of PA on female fertility in the general population and demonstrated that women who were active most days experienced fertility problems 3.2 times more often. Based on the study, exercise to the point of exhaustion also appeared to be harmful, leading to 2.3 times more fertility impairments than low-intensity PA [67]. Level II-2 evidence proves the significance of lifetime exercise in the study of Morris et al. ...
Full-text available
(1) Background: This study was designed to define whether pretreatment habitual physical activity (PA)-induced oxidative stress (OS) influences outcome measures by using 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in saliva samples of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). (2) Method: In this cohort study, samples were obtained from 26 patients (age: 34.6 ± 5.5 years, BMI: 25.3 ± 5.1, infertility: 51.0 ± 28.7 months) before the treatment and a follow-up of outcome measures of IVF/ICSI. The 8-OHdG was evaluated by Abcam’s ELISA (ab201734), PA patterns by GPAQ-H and ActiGraph GT3X; (3) Results: The number of matured oocytes was positively influenced by the GPAQ-H recreation MET (R2 = 0.367, F = 10.994, p = 0.004; β = 0.005, p = 0.004, B Constant = 4.604) and a positive significant relationship (R2 = 0.757, F = 17.692, p < 0.001, B Constant = 1.342) was found with GPAQ-H recreational PA MET (β = 0.004, p < 0.001), and Grade 1 embryos and higher very vigorous activity (GT3X) were accompanied (R2 = 0.958, F = 408.479, p < 0.001) by higher ß-hCG levels (β = 63.703, p ≤ 0.001). Unanticipated positive correlation between 8-OHdG and ß-hCG level (R = 0.467, p = 0.028) was noticed, and there were significant differences in 8-OHdG in biochemical pregnancies (pregnant: 54.82 ± 35.56 ng/mL, non-pregnant: 30.06 ± 10.40 ng/mL, p = 0.022) as well. (4) Conclusions: Pretreatment PA could positively influence reproductive performance in IVF/ICSI despite the induced OS. However, a more sensitive biomarker and the recommended amount of activity should be further investigated.
Reproductive aging is a natural and universal process. Women frequently overestimate the age at which a significant decline in fertility occurs as well as overestimate the success of assisted reproductive technologies to circumvent age-related infertility. Yet there is much that modern medicine can do to improve conception rates in women who delay childbearing and to manage subsequent pregnancies. This book offers guidance on winning strategies for maximizing the live-birth rate and limiting the risk for women trying to conceive later in life. It is intended to assist in navigating this challenging journey and lead to peace of mind that women have been seen, heard, and treated as individuals in the process. Written by leading experts addressing medical options of applying advanced reproductive technologies, psychological, nutritional, lifestyle, systematic approaches to optimizing fertility care for the most challenging demographic of women in a practical, clinically orientated, and most importantly, positive way.
Full-text available
Optimisation of lifestyle factors such as smoking and alcohol are encouraged to improve fecundability rates in the fertility setting. Currently, routine fertility consultations do not involve counselling or imparting advice regarding habitual physical activity (PA) and/or structured exercise, despite data showing that vigorous PA can be associated with delayed time to pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to determine habitual PA in a sample of women attending the one stop infertility (OSI) clinic. 250 women attending a large tertiary level NHS fertility unit prospectively anonymously completed a questionnaire over a period of 9 months. Participant's (mean age 34±5years, mean BMI 29±7kg/m2) habitual PA levels varied from vigorous exercise on ≥5 days/week (8%, n=17), to no moderate or high intensity activities across the whole week (66%, n=29). The majority of women reported no structured exercise (72%, n=179). No association was identified between any domain of PA and BMI, age, alcohol units, regular periods, or time spent trying to conceive (P > 0.05). Participant's habitual PA levels varied widely and no association between any domain of PA and background of the women was identified. No existing evidence and/or guidelines to explicitly inform women attempting to conceive regarding recommended PA levels are available, despite PA being a modifiable, affordable, and feasible lifestyle choice with the possible potential to improve fertility. A large-scale, clinical trial assessing effects of PA on fecundability is warranted to gain insights into the potential of this lifestyle factor to improve fertility outcomes and to explore the underlying biological mechanisms involved.
Globally, there is a rising prevalence of infertility, and it has a negative consequence on the quality of life of women. The researchers aimed to understand the knowledge, attitude, and practice of women with infertility toward exercises. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 332 women aged between 18 and 45 years attending an infertility clinic in a tertiary hospital in Southern India. Participants filled a self-developed, content validated, pilot-tested questionnaire. Informants perceived stress and weight gain to be the major causes of infertility. Exercise was believed to improve fertilization by 55.4% of the participants, and walking and yoga were the preferred mode of exercises.
Full-text available
This essay reviews the literature on the social psychological impact of infertility, paying special attention to the relationship between gender and the infertility experience. It is convenient to divide the literature into articles which explore the possibility that infertility may have psychological causes (Psychogenic Hypothesis) and those which examine the psychological consequences of infertility (Psychological Consequences Hypothesis). The psychogenic hypothesis is now rejected by most researchers, but a related hypothesis, which states that stress may be a causal factor in infertility, is worthy of exploration. The descriptive literature on the psychological consequences of infertility presents infertility as a devastating experience, especially for women. Attempts to test the psychological consequences hypothesis have produced more equivocal results. In general, studies which look for psychopathology have not found significant differences between the infertile and others. Studies which employ measures of stress and self-esteem have found significant differences. The psychological consequences literature is characterized by a number of flaws, including over sampling of women, small sample size, non-representative samples, failure to study those who have not sought treatment, primitive statistical techniques, and an over-reliance on self-reports. Studies on infertility and psychological distress need to take into consideration both the duration of infertility and the duration of treatment. Finding an appropriate set of "controls" is a particularly intractable problem for this area of research. In general, the psychological distress literature shows little regard for the social construction of infertility. By taking what should be understood as a characteristic of a social situation and transforming it into an individual trait, the literature presents what is essentially a medical model of the psycho-social impact of infertility. Most researchers conclude that infertility is a more stressful experience for women than it is for men. Most studies have found that the relationship between gender and infertility distress is not affected by which partner has the reproductive impairment. Future research needs to be better informed by theoretical considerations. Scholars need to pay more attention to the way the experience of infertility is conditioned by social structural realities. New ways need to be developed for better taking into account the processual nature of the infertility experience. Efforts need to be make to include under-studied portions of the infertile population. Finally, more effort needs to be made to better integrate the empirical study of the experience of infertility with important social policy questions.
Full-text available
To examine the relation of regular vigorous exercise to ovulatory infertility, we interviewed 346 infertile women, in whom there was evidence of ovulatory failure, regarding their exercise patterns during the year preceding their unsuccessful effort to conceive. Their responses were compared with similar exercise histories in women who had successfully conceived at the time the infertile women started trying to become pregnant. Vigorous exercise for an hour or more per day was reported more commonly in nulligravid cases (n = 187) than by their primiparous controls. The difference was particularly great in the subgroup of cases without additional evidence of tubal dysfunction (relative risk = 6.2, 90% confidence interval = 1.0 - 39.8). This association was not seen among infertile women who had previously been pregnant. Vigorous exercise for an average of less than one hour per day was not associated with either primary or secondary infertility.
Weight-bearing physical activity has beneficial effects on bone health across the age spectrum. Physical activities that generate relatively high-intensity loading forces, such as plyometrics, gymnastics, and high-intensity resistance training, augment bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents. Further, there is some evidence that exercise-induced gains in bone mass in children are maintained into adulthood, suggesting that physical activity habits during childhood may have long-lasting benefits on bone health. It is not yet possible to describe in detail an exercise program for children and adolescents that will optimize peak bone mass, because quantitative dose-response studies are lacking. However, evidence from multiple small randomized, controlled trials suggests that the following exercise prescription will augment bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: Mode: impact activities, such as gymnastics, plyometrics, and jumping, and moderate intensity resistance training; participation in sports that involve running and jumping (soccer, basketball) is likely to be of benefit, but scientific evidence is lacking Intensity: high, in terms of bone-loading forces; for safety reasons, resistance training should be <60% of 1-repetition maximum (IRM) Frequency: at least 3 d·wk-1 Duration: 10-20 min (2 times per day or more may be more effective) During adulthood, the primary goal of physical activity should be to maintain bone mass. Whether adults can increase bone mineral density (BMD) through exercise training remains equivocal. When increases have been reported, it has been in response to relatively high intensity weight-bearing endurance or resistance exercise; gains in BMD do not appear to be preserved when the exercise is discontinued. Observational studies suggest that the age-related decline in BMD is attenuated, and the relative risk for fracture is reduced, in people who are physically active, even when the activity is not particularly vigorous. However, there have been no large randomized, controlled trials to confirm these observations, nor have there been adequate dose-response studies to determine the volume of physical activity required for such benefits. It is important to note that, although physical activity may counteract to some extent the aging-related decline in bone mass, there is currently no strong evidence that even vigorous physical activity attenuates the menopause-related loss of bone mineral in women. Thus, pharmacologic therapy for the prevention of osteoporosis may be indicated even for those postmenopausal women who are habitually physically active. Given the current state of knowledge from multiple small randomized, controlled trials and large observational studies, the following exercise prescription is recommended to help preserve bone health during adulthood: Mode: weight-bearing endurance activities (tennis; stair climbing; jogging, at least intermittently during walking), activities that involve jumping (volleyball, basketball), and resistance exercise (weight lifting) Intensity: moderate to high, in terms of bone-loading forces Frequency: weight-bearing endurance activities 3-5 times per week; resistance exercise 2-3 times per week Duration: 30-60 min·d -1 of a combination of weight-bearing endurance activities, activities that involve jumping, and resistance exercise that targets all major muscle groups It is not currently possible to easily quantify exercise intensity in terms of bone-loading forces, particularly for weight-bearing endurance activities. However, in general, the magnitude of bone-loading forces increases in parallel with increasing exercise intensity quantified by conventional methods (e.g., percent of maximal heart rate or percent of 1RM). The general recommendation that adults maintain a relatively high level of weight-bearing physical activity for bone health does not have an upper age limit, but as age increases so, too, does the need for ensuring that physical activities can be performed safely. In light of the rapid and profound effects of immobilization and bed rest on bone loss, and the poor prognosis for recovery of mineral after remobilization, even the frailest elderly should remain as physically active as their health permits to preserve skeletal integrity. Exercise programs for elderly women and men should include not only weight-bearing endurance and resistance activities aimed at preserving bone mass, but also activities designed to improve balance and prevent falls. Maintaining a vigorous level of physical activity across the lifespan should be viewed as an essential component of the prescription for achieving and maintaining good bone health.
[Two of the authors respond:] We agree with Herbert Nehrlich that there are many situations in which physicians would benefit from the assistance of health and fitness professionals. It is essential that such advice be sought from professionals who have received formal training and attained national accreditation. In North America1 these would be professionals certified by the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology or the American College of Sports Medicine. Together, physicians and health and fitness professionals will be able to provide information that is based on sound physiological principles and a clear knowledge of the absolute and relative contraindications to exercise for a variety of populations. Giuseppe Lippi and associates correctly point out that vigorous exercise may lead to supplemental health gains in sedentary community-dwelling individuals. There is growing evidence to suggest that certain groups may benefit greatly from high-intensity exercise training. We1 have advocated high-intensity exercise training for sedentary individuals2 and patients with cardiovascular disease3 and chronic heart failure.4 However, we are careful to acknowledge that adherence to this form of exercise may be poor and the risk of musculoskeletal injury higher. Therefore, we must weigh carefully the potential advantages and disadvantages of vigorous exercise for each individual client. As pointed out by Ediriweera Desapriya and colleagues, discussion of the barriers to exercise and innovative means to deliver inclusive and culturally appropriate physical activity interventions is of great importance. Furthermore, more effective lifestyle interventions are required to address the global crisis of physical inactivity. We have worked diligently to address the barriers to physical activity and have taken a transdisciplinary approach to the creation of novel exercise interventions. More work is required to “develop and deliver” inclusive interventions for all, but we believe that our work1,5 is a step in the right direction. As Rajesh Chauhan and associates point out, the determinants of health are multifactorial and physical activity is not the sole factor influencing health status. However, physical inactivity is an independent predictor of the risk for many chronic diseases and premature mortality. In fact, the risk for chronic disease and premature mortality in North America appears to be about 20% to 50% greater among those with a physically inactive lifestyle.5 Furthermore, physical activity appears to be protective in the presence of other known risk factors for chronic disease. Therefore, there is compelling evidence to support the independent health benefits of physical activity.
Despite extensive use over 40 years, physical activity questionnaires still show limited reliability and validity. Measurements have value in indicating conditions where an increase in physical activity would be beneficial and in monitoring changes in population activity. However, attempts at detailed interpretation in terms of exercise dosage and the extent of resulting health benefits seem premature. Such usage may become possible through the development of standardised instruments that will record the low intensity activities typical of sedentary societies, and will ascribe consistent biological meaning to terms such as light, moderate, and heavy exercise.
The Female Athlete Triad is a syndrome occurring in physically active girls and women. Its interrelated components are disordered eating, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis. Pressure placed on young women to achieve or maintain unrealistically low body weight underlies development of the Triad. Adolescents and women training in sports in which low body weight is emphasized for athletic activity or appearance are at greatest risk. Girls and women with one component of the Triad should be screened for the others. Alone or in combination, Female Athlete Triad disorders can decrease physical performance and cause morbidity and mortality. More research is needed on its causes, prevalence, treatment, and consequences. All individuals working with physically active girls and women should be educated about the Female Athlete Triad and develop plans to prevent, recognize, treat, and reduce its risks.
104 healthy women who had been attempting to become pregnant for three months were interviewed about their use of caffeinated beverages, alcohol, and cigarettes. In their subsequent cycles, women who consumed more than the equivalent of one cup of coffee per day were half as likely to become pregnant, per cycle, as women who drank less. A dose-response effect was present. PIP Fecundability of 104 healthy women attempting to become pregnant was halved by consumption of the equivalent of 1 cup of brewed coffee or more daily. 104 women who had not conceived after 3 months during a larger study of early pregnancy loss were interviewed about consumption of coffee, tea and caffeinated beverages. Those consuming over 3150 mg caffeine per month, the median, were considered in the high consumption group, and those consuming less the low group. Fecundability, the probability of becoming clinically pregnant in a given menstrual cycle, when expressed as a ratio, averaged 0.59 over the 3rd to 8th cycle, and 0.53 after 6 more months in the high consumption group. Multivariate analysis, controlling for age, frequency of intercourse, and age at menarche, found no effect for these variables, nor for smoking, vitamins, analgesics, alcohol, marijuana, weight, height, or husband's caffeine consumption. When the data were divided into 5 dose levels, there was a dose-response effect: fecundability of the highest consumption group fell to 26% of that of the lowest group. When the data were treated by the life table approach, 6% of the women were still not pregnant in the low consumption group by cycle 13, compared to 28% in the high consumption group, a relative risk of 4.7 (p0.005). The mechanism of action of caffeine on fecundability is unknown.
The objective of this study was to examine the mechanisms by which physical activity affects the menstrual cycle. Women with high, medium, and low levels of physical activity were compared for menstrual function, physical characteristics, and urinary and serum levels of luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, estradiol-17 beta, and 2-hydroxyestrone. None of the physical characteristics other than age and muscle area were significantly different in the three groups. The percentage of body fat did not appear to be a factor in the amenorrhea induced by strenuous exercise, as the percent of body fat in all three groups was less than 22%. The group of athletes under strenuous exercise which correlated with oligomenorrhea had decreased serum levels of luteinizing hormone, prolactin, and estradiol-17 beta but elevated levels of 2-hydroxyestrone. These data suggest that anovulatory cycles are correlated with the amount of exercise and increased levels of catechol estrogens. Catecholamines and beta-endorphin elevated by exercise may interact to suppress luteinizing hormone release at the hypothalamic pituitary axis.