Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Carcinoma of the Prostate Gland

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (Impact Factor: 2.84). 10/2009; 133(10):1568-76. DOI: 10.1043/1543-2165-133.10.1568
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: Thomas Wheeler
  • Source
    • "Many recommendations of this consensus conference have already been incorporated into international guidelines, including the recent College of American Pathologists protocol and checklist for reporting adenocarcinoma of the prostate and the structured reporting protocol for prostatic carcinoma from the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia [10, 11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A problem when handling radical prostatectomy specimens (RPS) is that cancer is often not visible at gross examination, and the tumor extent is always underestimated by the naked eye. The challenge is increased further by the fact that prostate cancer is a notoriously multifocal and heterogeneous tumor. For the pathologist, the safest method to avoid undersampling of cancer is evidently that the entire prostate is submitted. Even though whole mounts of sections from RPS appear not to be superior to sections from standard blocks in detecting adverse pathological features, their use has the great advantage of displaying the architecture of the prostate and the identification and location of tumour nodules more clearly, with particular reference to the index tumour; further, it is easier to compare the pathological findings with those obtained from digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and prostate biopsies. We are in favour of complete sampling of the RPS examined with the whole mount technique. There are reasons in favour and a few drawbacks. Its implementation does not require an additional amount of work from the technicians' side. It gives further clinical significance to our work of uropathologists.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2012
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A feedback neural network model with memory connections for classification and weight connections for selection is proposed. After training, a memory vector is interpreted as a prototype of a feature pattern, and a weight vector represents importance of feature variables to the corresponding feature pattern. The proposed neural network has a simple network architecture and high learning speed. Moreover, the obtained knowledge can be described by natural language. The technique is applied to the IRIS data: the two effective feature variables were extracted, and the corresponding number of errors, is almost the same as using four feature variables
    No preview · Conference Paper · Jun 1998
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we present an original embedded system, named MAHARADJA, based on the association of a microcontroller and a dedicated post potential synaptic computation unit circuit. This system performs real time simulation of RBF neural network with the Mahalanobis distance with low power dissipation. We compare this system with general purpose microprocessors and with specialized and dedicated neurocomputers. We show that this system is a good paradigm compared to the other systems
    No preview · Conference Paper · Feb 1999
Show more