... There are numerous applications of DEA to evaluate efficiency within various fields of transport (for a survey, see Markovits-Somogyi, 2011). For instance, DEA is applied to both infrastructures such as airports (e.g., Suzuki, Nijkamp, Rietveld, & Pels, 2010;Curi, Gitto, & Mancuso, 2010;Suzuki, Nijkamp, Pels, & Rietveld, 2014), railways (e.g., Yu & Lin, 2008;Roets & Christiaens, 2015), and seaports (e.g., Panayides et al., 2009;Odeck & Bråthen, 2012); and operators, such as airline companies (e.g., Chiou & Chen, 2006;Michaelides, Belegri-Roboli, Karlaftis, & Marinos, 2009), road transport firms (e.g., Bhagavath, 2006;Caro-Vela, Paralera, & Contreras, 2013;Jarboui, Pascal, & Younes, 2013;Andrejic, Bojovic, & Kilibarda, 2016), and shipping lines (e.g., Gutiérrez, Lozano, & Furió, 2014). The advantage of the DEA is that no assumptions need to be made about the shape of the efficient frontier or the internal operation of each DMU (Bray, Caggiani, & Ottomanelli, 2015), but the results should still be interpreted with caution due to the methodology's sensitivity to outliers and measurement errors (Cooper et al., 2011) The DEA approach is very useful for corporate managers, shareholders, regulators, and policymakers who need quantitative data about the relative performance (Suzuki et al., 2014) in order to create a benchmarking standard. ...