ArticlePDF Available

Game Reward Systems: Gaming Experiences and Social Meanings


Abstract and Figures

The authors give an overview of how various video game reward systems provide positive experiences to players, and propose classifications for rewards and reward characteristics for further analysis. We also discuss what reward systems encourage players to do, and describe how they provide fun even before players receive their rewards. Next, we describe how game reward systems can be used to motivate or change behaviors in the physical world. One of our main suggestions is that players can have fun with both rewards and reward mechanisms—enjoying rewards while reacting to the motivation that such rewards provide. Based on relevant psychological theories, we discuss how reward mechanisms foster intrinsic motivation while giving extrinsic rewards. We think that reward systems and mechanisms in modern digital games provide social meaning for players primarily through motivation, enhanced status within gaming societies, and the use of rewards as social tools.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 Conference: Think Design Play.
© 2011 Authors & Digital Games Research Association DiGRA. Personal and educational classroom use of
this paper is allowed, commercial use requires specific permission from the author.
Game Reward Systems: Gaming
Experiences and Social Meanings
Hao Wang
National Chiao Tung University, Department of Computer Science
1001, Ta Hsieh Road, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
Chuen-Tsai Sun
National Chiao Tung University, Department of Computer Science
1001, Ta Hsieh Road, Hsinchu City, Taiwan
The authors give an overview of how various video game reward systems provide
positive experiences to players, and propose classifications for rewards and reward
characteristics for further analysis. We also discuss what reward systems encourage
players to do, and describe how they provide fun even before players receive their
rewards. Next, we describe how game reward systems can be used to motivate or change
behaviors in the physical world. One of our main suggestions is that players can have fun
with both rewards and reward mechanismsenjoying rewards while reacting to the
motivation that such rewards provide. Based on relevant psychological theories, we
discuss how reward mechanisms foster intrinsic motivation while giving extrinsic
rewards. We think that reward systems and mechanisms in modern digital games provide
social meaning for players primarily through motivation, enhanced status within gaming
societies, and the use of rewards as social tools.
game design, reward system, motivation, social interaction in games, flow
Examples of videogame rewards include virtual items received after completing World of
Warcraft (Blizzard, 2004) quests, added points and visual effect after clearing block lines
in Tetris, and finding treasure items in secret hiding places in the Super Mario Bros series
(Nintendo). Reward systems can be viewed as player motivators or as compromises for
easing disappointment. In modern video games, reward systems also provide social
meaning within and outside of games (Reeves & Read, 2009; Salen & Zimmerman,
2004). To our knowledge, there is plenty of information and multiple theories in the
psychology literature on optimal experiences, intrinsically motivating environments,
sense of accomplishment, satisfaction, choice, and other concepts that reward system
designers can take advantage of. Reward mechanisms provide sense of fun by fostering
intrinsically rewarding experiences and are equally or more important than the extrinsic
rewards that are distributed. The term intrinsic we use in this paper is about fun of
playing itself while extrinsic is about the actual reward. Our goal in this paper is to
review and analyze the main structural features of videogame reward systems.
-- 2 --
Specifically, after classifying rewards and discussing their use and effects, we will
suggest characteristics for analyzing rewards, and discuss how players use them.
Reward systems differ based on type of play, and have different effects on players
according to their preferences and motivations. Social and cultural contexts also
determine how reward systems affect gaming experiences. Huizinga (2003), one of the
first to argue that culture is derived from play and to stress the cultural function of play,
suggested that play has five characteristics: it is a free activity, therefore anyone forced to
play is not actually playing; it is separate from ordinary life; it involves no real-world
profit; it proceeds according to fixed rules within temporal and spatial boundaries; and
players tend to form social groups marked by secrecy and separation from other groups.
These characteristics, which have attracted much research attention and discussion, are
associated with general play rather than video game play. Some ideas may not fit video
game contextsfor example, a World of Warcraft player may not feel free to leave a
game at any time because of social pressure from teammates or fellow guild members. In
addition, reward systems sometimes make players play for extrinsic reward like virtual
items while not really enjoy the play activity itself. Web games and Facebook games are
examples of play that blur temporal and spatial boundariespeople can play games at
any time, even during work time in their offices.
In Man, Play and Games, Caillois (2001) proposed four characteristics for game
classification. The first, Agôn (“competition”) is typical of sports and most games
involving two or more players. Games that have Agôn are promoted in many societies
because they imply training, discipline, perseverance, and other positive characteristics.
Reward systems provide things that are easy to compare between players like scores and
virtual items thus can add Agôn to many kinds of games. Alea (“chance”) means that
players have no control over game outcomes; Alea deemphasizes or eliminates the skills
and other attributes that Agôn promotes. Unlike Huizinga, Caillois gave serious
consideration to games of chance involving gambling. The fun of chance itself is also an
important element in reward systems. The third characteristic, mimicry (“simulation”)
refers to make-believe play, in which players portray imaginary characters. Ilinx
(“vertigo”) refers to the characteristic of players temporarily surrendering their physical
or mental stabilityfor instance, taking a fear-inducing rollercoaster ride. These
characteristics are not mutually exclusive: in most sports, both competition and chance
contribute to enjoyment. Games can also be analyzed in terms of rule influence and
structure—that is, in terms of paidia (“turbulent, improvisational play”) or ludus (“play
with tight, fixed rules”). The video game The Sims is more paidia, while Starcraft is more
Sutton-Smith (1997) has analyzed play according to seven value systems that he refers to
as rhetorics: (a) play as progresschildren can adapt and develop through play; (b) play
as fategames of chance (gambling) in which players surrender control over outcomes;
(c) play as powerusing play as a form of conflict, mostly applied to sports and contests;
(d) play as identitythat is, maintaining social group identity in the form of activities
such as festivals and carnivals; (e) play as imaginaryplay as creative activities in a
visionary context; (f) play as selfsolitary activities ranging from hobbies such as stamp
collecting to immersive activities such as mountain climbing; (g) play as frivolous
activitynothing is considered productive outside the boundaries of play. The first six
rhetorics entail possible real-world benefits, and therefore suggest that play can be
justified. Reward systems can create a sense of progress by providing, for example,
-- 3 --
developable avatars. The play as power element can be added to games through rewards
comparable between players. Recently, there are also games that provide collectable
Salen and Zimmerman (2004) have grouped aspects of play into three categories: game
play, ludic activities, and being playful. The first category is only applied to games. They
suggest that the goal of successful game design is creating meaningful play, which occurs
when relationships between player actions and outcomes are discernable (clearly
perceived by players) and integrated (actions affect play experience in subsequent games).
Reward systems help build relationships and make them stronger over time; immediate
feedback makes outcomes discernable, while rewards that can be accumulated and used
later make outcomes integrative.
Many researchers have tried to clarify why people play video games. LeBlanc (2004) has
proposed an MDA (mechanics, dynamics and aesthetics) model for game design analysis
that includes a list of eight kinds of fun: sensation, fantasy, narrative, challenge,
fellowship, discovery, expression, and submission (see also Hunicke, 2004). Lazzaro
(2004) has listed four keys to creating emotion in video games as hard fun, easy fun,
altered state, and a people factor. Bartle’s (1996) four player categories, based on multi-
user dungeon (MUD) games, are achievers, killers, socializers, and explorersa
taxonomy that corresponds to player activities. Based on player responses to massively
multiplayer online role playing games (MMORPGs), Yee (2007) has extended Bartle’s
taxonomy to propose three major MMORPG gaming components: achievement,
immersion, and social interaction. According to Ryan et al. (2006), the pull of a game is
sometimes associated with out-of-game effects. Using self-determination theory (SDT),
they posit that the pull of games largely results from their ability to generate (at least in
the short term) three key feelings of well-being: autonomy (sense of willingness),
competence (challenge and feeling of effectance), and relatedness (feeling of connection
with other people). Koster (2005) views game fun in terms of four categories: fun,
aesthetic appreciation, visceral reactions, and social status maneuvers. In that taxonomy,
fun focuses on mastering a problem mentallythat is, recognizing new patterns based on
our brain’s desire for stimuli. Thus, Koster’s definition of a good game is one that teaches
a player all aspects of the game before the player stops playing. In the following sections,
we analyze how reward systems provide pleasure and satisfying experiences by
classifying rewards and playing activities, and relate reward mechanics to psychological
Based on multiple surveys and analyses of video games, we propose an admittedly
incomplete list of eight reward forms:
1. Score systems, one of the earliest forms, use numbers to mark player performance.
Score-keeping is one controlled feature that Malone (1981) used to investigate what
makes a game fun; he is one of many researchers who consider it crucial to fun. Scores,
which sometimes affect gameplay indirectly, generally serve as tools for self-assessment
and comparison. Researchers have classified rewards (mostly in role-playing games, or
RPGs) as glory, sustenance, access, and facility (Hallford & Hallford, 2001). Scores are
typically placed in the glory classification, since they generally exert no direct impact on
game play. Systems that connect scores with players’ virtual identities are currently
popular among Internet-based gamesthey are persistent, can be accumulated long-term,
-- 4 --
and represent a player’s status rather than a single play performance summary. For
example, the ladder system in World of Warcraft uses scores to calculate player ratings
that change after each victory or defeat.
2. The majority of games in which players control developable avatars (e.g., RPGs) use
experience point reward systems. Avatars earn experience points during gameplay, and
“level up” when specified goals are achieved. Thus, experience points represent a facility
type of reward, since they enhance avatar ability (Hallford & Hallford, 2001). Rewards
are often given in the form of new skills or increases in attributes such as strength or
intelligence. These systems differ from score systems in at least three ways: they are
bound to specific avatars rather than single gameplays or specific players; they are rarely
used for purposes of player ranking because they reflect time and effort rather than player
skill; and they directly affect gameplay by making certain tasks easier to accomplish, as
well as by expanding the number of ways that a game can be played. Avatar or player
account levels affect game play in several ways, therefore almost all kinds of players are
influenced by them. Players cannot explore game worlds without gaining a proper level,
and social-oriented players must gain sufficiently high levels in order to play with other
high-level players.
3. Item granting system rewards consist of virtual items that can be used by players or
(much more commonly) avatars. These systems are widely used in RPGs and MMORPGs.
Items can be considered glory and/or facility rewards, depending on player interest. Item
granting mechanisms encourage player exploration of gameworlds, and are thought to
maintain player interest during lull times in between plot-advancing conversations, major
enemy encounters, and other exciting moments. In the dungeon crawler game Diablo II,
item collection was originally meant to be the main source of fun. Some MMORPG
players are known to devote considerable time and sometimes real money (Guo & Barnes,
2007) to accumulate rare forms of game equipment, thus making item granting
mechanisms an important concern among game designers.
4. Resources are valuables that can be collected and used in a manner that affects
gameplay. Examples include virtual wood and stone in Age of Empires III (Microsoft
Game Studios, 2005), and life counts in the Super Mario Bros series. Players can put a lot
of effort into collecting MMORPG resources (Yee, 2006). This kind of reward system
primarily corresponds to sustenance (Hallford & Hallford, 2001). Resources and items
differ in at least one important aspect: resources are mostly for practical game use or
sharing, whereas items have collecting and social comparison value. In addition, though
the experience points in leveling system somehow also act like resources, they mark the
growth of avatars and create a feeling of progress and achievements while resources
create feelings mainly about timely support.
5. Achievement systems usually consist of titles that are bound to avatars or player
accounts; users collect them by fulfilling clearly stated conditions. Achievement systems
encourage players to complete specific tasks, play in challenging ways, or explore
gameworlds. These kinds of reward systems are classified as glory. Collectable titles
serve as metagoals, and thus provide “multiple level goals” for various challenges (Gee,
2007; Malone, 1981). World of Warcraft players can collect more than a thousand titles,
some of which are considered very difficult to earn, thus giving players a sense of
achievement in addition to rewards. Blizzard Entertainment publicly acknowledged the
first player to collect all achievement titles, making him a celebrity in gaming circles.
Xbox 360 also has an achievement system for the same purpose (Jakobsson, 2011).
-- 5 --
6. Feedback messages are mostly used to provide instant rewards. Juul’s (2010) five
elements of casual game design include fiction, usability, interruptibility, difficulty and
punishment, and juiciness. Juiciness is the instant positive feedback that players receive
in response to successful actions. Its purpose is to create positive emotions; it is not
limited to casual games only. One example is the word “perfect” shown on screens in
rhythm games such as Dance Dance Revolution (Konami, 1998) when players hit the
correct buttons with precise timing. Pictures, sound effects, and video clips are also
commonly used as feedback mechanisms. Since they are ephemeral, they are neither
collectable nor available for player comparisons, and do not directly affect gameplay.
Their value exists in the sense of praise they evoke; as Reeves et al. (1996), Bracken et al.
(2004), and others have shown, computer-generated praise can affect human emotions
and behaviors. In addition, as the name implies, instant feedback systems provide the
immediate rewards that are a central concern of flow theorists.
7. Plot animations and pictures, which are used as rewards following important events
such as the defeat of a major enemy, clearing a new level, or ending a game. Their
purpose is to motivate players to advance game stories. They provide a sense of fun in at
least two ways: the animations and pictures are visually attractive, and they serve as
milestones marking player achievement.
8. Unlocking mechanisms give players access to game content (e.g., new levels, access to
special virtual environments, and mini-games) once certain requirements are met. This
kind of reward is best classified as access (Hallford & Hallford, 2001). When discussing
ways to arouse curiosity, Malone (1981) suggests that one of the most important features
of intrinsically motivating environments is providing incomplete information about a
subject. Rather than show all possibilities and choices at the beginning of games, these
mechanisms reward players as games progress by gradually exposing hidden parts of
gameworlds. For example, World of Warcraft avatars must achieve certain levels before
gaining access to higher-level environments. Unlocking mechanisms are thought to
maintain player curiosity about what might be made available for future play, and to
make players feel as though there is always something new to look forward to. This form
of reward is strongly associated with Gee’s (2007) ideas regarding the correspondence
between learning and game playing. The reward system serves not only as reinforcement
for good performance, but also as an environment in support of an “ongoing learning
In consideration of how rewards, reward mechanisms, and players interact, we believe
there are at least four reward system attributes that can be used to analyze their influences
on different kinds of players (Bartle, 1996; Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Ducheneaut &
Moore, 2004; Yee, 2007). The first is social value, which is suitable for either
comparison purposes or social interactions. It is common for gamers to invite other
players to their homes or to upload game records to show off their skills and to compare
their current levels. Similar to children in a playground, they may gather for competition;
unlike playground players, they are much more likely to record scores for viewing by
others, especially in gaming arcades (Höysniemi, 2006). Arcade machines present lists of
player scores along with their names, whereas online players compare their achievements
in the form of in-game rewards or announcements on gaming forums. Scores are
considered one of the best mechanisms for comparisons because they can be easily
presented and understood. Virtual items are convenient for comparisons among players
especially in MMORPGs, where players can show off their rare pieces of equipment as
-- 6 --
proof of their advanced skills. Avatars wearing hard-to-get but well-known items always
draw attention, and funny virtual items may be displayed during social occasions. The
World of Warcraft system supports presentations of multiple player achievements on a
webpage, making it possible for individuals to achieve fame. We have observed that
players are more likely to compare their game-related accomplishments or luck rather
than resources, which can be purchased for virtual or real-world currency. The ease of
resource availability has been criticized as breaking the atmosphere of a closed play
world, also known as Huizinga’s “magic circle” (Lin et al., 2007).
The second attribute is how rewards affect gameplay, ranging from no direct effect, to
helping advance a game, to providing new content. Each type attracts different kinds of
players. Using Bartle’s taxonomy as an example, achievers and killers focus on making
personal progress, developing their avatars, challenging strong enemies, and defeating
other players. These kinds of players are the least interested in visual rewards and mini-
games, and the most interested in accumulating treasure, weapons, titles, and other
evidence of their advanced skills and accomplishments. In comparison, socializers show
greater interest in superficial game aspects that can draw attention to them and support
interactions with other players. Explorers are similar to achievers and killers in their
desire to earn rewards that are new or unique. Their motivation for accumulating standard
rewards differs in that their primary interest is in gaining sufficient strength to explore
gameworlds in detail. We suggest that it is possible to determine gamer playing styles by
looking at what kinds of rewards they are most interested in acquiring.
The third attribute is the suitability of a reward for collection and review, with players
having motivations that range from building a sense of accomplishment to preserving
game memories (Formanek, 1994). Obviously, items that require a lot of effort have
greater value as reminders of past experiences, or as representations of goal fulfillment.
From a social point of view, collecting helps players recognize other players with similar
interests when gathering in online forums or at real-world meetings. We have observed an
especially strong interest in collecting achievement titles in games such as World of
Warcraft and the Metal Gear Solid series. Their clearly structured reward systems
facilitate comparisons, create a sense of collecting aesthetics, and strengthen feelings of
completion and perfection (Danet & Katriel, 1989). For these reasons it is important that
rewards be easy to present and review.
The fourth attribute is the time required to earn and/or receive a reward. Whereas real-
world rewards may take years to emerge (e.g., job promotions), game rewards can be as
instantaneous as a pop-up message (e.g., “Perfect!”), or as delayed as achieving a new
level after days of repetitive monster killing. Game companies clearly put a lot of effort
into planning this aspect of reward distribution in order to enhance positive gaming
experiences. Properly timed rewards can help create senses of accomplishment and value,
while poorly timed rewards can cause players to give up and move on to other games
(Gee, 2007; Koster, 2005). Differences in individual willingness to accept delayed
satisfaction increase the complexity of reward timing. The designers of games that use
item reward systems must carefully limit the potential for player frustration. Also, in
order to attract casual players, designers must carefully balance required player
commitment with reward quality (Juul, 2010).
In video games, players can choose how to utilize the rewards they earn. By making
player communication and organization much easier, the Internet offers new options for
-- 7 --
utilizing rewards. Our proposal for a dual-axis classification system for reward usage is
illustrated in Figure 1. The self-other axis emphasizes the idea that rewards may be
oriented to personal satisfaction or to other players within a community (partly
corresponding to the idea of play as self versus social activity), and the progress-casual
axis reflects how seriously players view their gaming activities and accumulated rewards
(partly corresponding to play as frivolous versus play as power). As shown in Figure 1,
our proposed model consists of four classifications:
Figure 1: Reward usage classifications.
1. Advancement. Players use rewards to make game progressfor example, building
avatar strength with powerful World of Warcraft items. Rewards in this category mitigate
challenge levels so that players can advance and gain feelings of increased skill and
power. It can be argued that player skill levels are not actually affected by the use of
rewards, but that players simply feel a greater sense of fun if they believe that their skills
are improving. According to Malone (1981), players who merely think they are good at a
game like the game more than others, while those who are actually better at a game do
2. Review. Players like to check their achievement collections, view their avatars wearing
powerful items, and watch animations presented in games. Reviewing rewards provides
entertainment, a sense of accomplishment, and memories linking play events to specific
rewards (Formanek, 1994). Thus, making rewards accessible for review is an important
aspect of game design.
3. Sociality. Examples of using rewards as social tools include giving World of Warcraft
avatars funny appearances, sharing information about rewards with other players, and
showing off rare achievements or powerful weapons to establish status. These kinds of
activities reflect the growing importance of player interaction via online forums or
informal gatherings of gamers for single-player games. Game companies are therefore
creating more elaborate reward systems that motivate and support such interactions. For
example, a reward system based on revealing secrets can be explored by all players, who
then discuss their search activities in forums, thereby building relationships with others.
4. Cooperate/Compete. Examples include sharing resources with teammates and hoarding
powerful items to maintain advantages over other players. Diablo II encourages
-- 8 --
cooperation in order to accumulate pieces of equipment called “set items” as bonuses. It
is not easy to collect all items in a set, therefore many Diablo II players possess multiple
items belonging to different sets. The game design encourages player interactions to
make item exchanges.
Game players rarely play alone. Even users of single player games tend to share their
experiences and compare achievements with others. As stated above, social aspects are
important motivations for play, and social relationships inevitably affect and are affected
by game play activity. Juul (2010) lists three kinds of social gaming considerations as
goal orientation (“I want to win”), gaming experiences (“I should play slightly below my
best to make the game more fun”), and social management (“I better let my boss win”).
How do reward systems create social meaning? To earn rewards, players must locate
information, thus reward systems that require information exchange or sharing encourage
social interaction (Sun et al., 2006). Many games require players to work together to
fulfill a requirement, and therefore encourage cooperation. In World of Warcraft, the need
for cooperation to achieve personal goals has inspired players to create a dragon kill point
(DKP) reward distribution system to manage their cooperative play. Players accumulate
DKPs by making contributions to team effort, and can use accumulated DKPs to buy
virtual items that teams have access to. This is an example of transformative social play
(Salen & Zimmermann, 2004), in which players change the game to enhance gaming
experiences. Rewards that can be easily demonstrated affect social interactions by
showing what a player or group of players have achieved. Rewards can accelerate social
interaction as a symbol of personal achievement, ability, playing style, and so on (Reeves
& Read, 2009). Players can quickly decide whether to interact or how to interact with
other players. For example, players who want to know how to solve a quest can ask
someone who owns the type of reward that is given by solving the quest. According to
Koster’s (2005) discussion of social status maneuvering, the value of showing off a
reward should not be ignored. In groups such as MMORPG guilds, rewards that show
group achievement can enhance feelings of belonging and experiences of “play as
identity” (Sutton-Smith, 1997).
In this section we will summarize reward mechanism-based design heuristics aimed at
creating better gaming experiences. According to Koster (2005), people enjoy learning,
but tend to be lazy; in gaming, this means that players tend to give up. Hallford and
Hallford (2001) believe that reward systems should keep players excited over the course
of a game. Although the direct function of any reward is to provide a goal, a well-
designed reward mechanism can push players by maintaining positive gaming
experiences and motivations, thus helping endure inevitable slow times and low points.
Reward mechanisms in video games can enhance feelings of fun long before rewards are
actually giventhat is, rewards can create a sense of anticipation among players who
know what is specifically required to earn them. Loewenstein (1987) and Rozin (1999)
are among many researchers who have commented on how the pleasure of anticipation is
an important aspect of positive experiencesfor instance, looking forward to a trip to a
new country is exciting by itself. In the context of video games, players feel pleasure
when anticipating rewards. One tactic used by designers is reminding players about
potential rewards, perhaps programming non-player characters (NPCs) to talk about a
legendary sword owned by a demon, thus encouraging players to challenge that demon
and capture the sword. At a certain point, the pleasure of anticipation can be replaced by a
-- 9 --
sense of anxiety or displeasure. For example, players may not be happy if they unlock a
piece of equipment and discover that it is only slightly better than the one it was designed
to replace. Game designers thus need to keep in mind a basic rule when creating a reward
system: the longer the delay, the greater the necessity to provide a reward that is
significantly higher in terms of quality or usefulness.
Interest in rewards can be increased by withholding details about them. Players who are
not completely certain about what needs to be done to gain a reward may exert
considerable energy trying to figure that out; many players consider this learning process
enjoyable. Players are fond of discovering unknown facts by themselves; someone from
outside their game community may be viewed as “bossing them around” (Gee, 2007) if
they try to give instructions. Anyone who visits a casino understands the attraction of
chance. As with gamblers, video gamers are encouraged and expectations are increased
when they receive rewards at random intervals (Hopson, 2002). However, probability
must be established so that players do not get used to rewards or feel frustrated when they
don’t arrive as frequently as expected. Greater risk must be accompanied by the potential
for more valuable rewards. Note also that rewards can destroy intrinsic motivation
(Lepper & Greene, 1978; Pittman, 1982), and that rewards located outside of games can
corrupt play (Caillois, 2001). The question of how rewards can degrade gaming
experiences needs further exploration.
When designing rewards, one of the most basic and intriguing tasks is determining target
customer motivation. Yee (2006) found that male players are more interested in
achievement, while female players are more interested in the social aspects of a game.
However, Begy and Consalvo (2011) have very recently reported that female players are
exceptionally attracted by achievement-related content in the Facebook game
Faunasphere, which conflicts with Yee’s finding. Flexibility in required commitment is
also very important, especially in casual games. A well designed game should reward
both casual and hardcore players. Even in hardcore games, goal mechanics that feature
optional goals can attract more players by supporting casual play (Juul, 2010). Games
should also encourage trial-and-error, which is considered key to creative playan
important source of fun (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004). As Koster (2005) observes, “Fun is
about learning in a context where there is no pressure, and that is why games matter.”
Hallford and Hallford (2001) emphasize the point that reward systems should support
rather than punish player curiosity. According to flow theory, the absence of concern
about failure is a key ingredient of flow experiences.
Games can attract a broader range of players and keep them playing longer by providing
relatedness (Ryan, 2006), social status (Koster, 2005; Salen & Zimmerman, 2004), and
other positive experiences. Social play reward systems should have at least two
characteristics: provide rewards that require players to share information, seek help from
the gaming society, and cooperate; and be easy to demonstrate, share, and use to
communicate meaningful player information (Reeves, 2009). Reward quality should
increase in step with skill level to keep players at the margin of ability (Gee, 2007; Koster,
2005). In terms of randomness and delay, rewards should be predictable enough to
maintain a fun level of anticipation (Loewenstein, 1987; Rozin, 1999). However,
occasional surprises are intuitively good and supported by evidence from biology
experiments (Caplin & Dean, 2008). Goals and game mechanics are two primary forces
that drive players and provide pleasure. Short-term goals link pursuit of achievement to
engagement in game mechanics, and provide a sense of control (a flow characteristic) by
giving some direction about what to do next. With short-term goals, players feel
-- 10 --
accomplishment and get feedback during the course of play, which are essential to
meaningful play (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004).
Flow theory, which addresses optimal experiences associated with activities, is currently
at the center of research on fun in games. Although it is generally used to analyze
intrinsically rewarding experiences, we believe that flow theory is also an appropriate
tool for analyzing game systems that distribute extrinsic rewards. Flow experiences have
nine characteristics: clear goals at every step, immediate feedback, a balance between
challenge and skill, merged action and awareness, a neglect of distractions, no worry of
failure, absence of self-consciousness, distorted sense of time, and an autotelic quality.
We will focus on three of these in our analysis of how reward systems offer positive
experiences: balance between challenge and skill, clear goals, and immediate feedback.
Many video and online gaming researchers have studied the balance between challenges
and skills and between boredom and anxiety. Koster (2005) suggests that fun is at the
margin of a player’s ability when mentally mastering a problem. When players face
challenges that seem too high for their skill levels, their anxiety motivates them to either
improve their skills or reduce their challenges; the first option is considered much better
because the second generally results in increased frustration. Using a score system as an
example, players may not be able to finish a complete game, but they can try to break
their own records, create a sense of accomplishment, or return to complete a full game at
a later time. In this example, the reward system makes it easy for players to set goals
appropriate for their skill levels. In a game such as Diablo II, which uses an experience
point and item reward system, players may not be good enough to defeat the boss, but
they can still strengthen their avatars by killing monsters. Thus, players feel that they are
getting better while the challenge level remains the samea desirable balance in terms of
game design.
When skill levels exceed challenges, players will eventually experience boredom. A
reward system can rectify such situations in two ways: modify the emotion through
rewards, or help players establish higher challenges. Increasing avatar level (the most
common strategy in RPGs) provides fun by making players feel that they are in an active
stage of development. However, players may feel bored if the tasks they need to fulfill in
order to level up are not sufficiently enjoyable, or fail to trigger a strong sense of
Reward systems that provide quick feedback also play an important role in clarifying
short-term goals; without them, many games suffer from the problem of having clear
long-term but ambiguous short-term goals. Some of the most effective reward systems
divide large, complex quests into a series of shorter tasks, each with a separate subgoal.
These organizing and gathering tasks are completed as subquests that have clear short-
term goals within much larger contexts. While most online games provide rewards via
item-dropping and achievement systems, these activities are inadequate for single-player
casual products such as rhythm and puzzle games. In these situations, players are more
likely to be rewarded immediately following skillful moves by receiving points or praise
from virtual characters. In gaming arcades where onlookers are present, immediate
feedback (visual and audio messages) that follow expert moves play a large role in
attracting audiences and triggering feedback (Höysniemi, 2006).
-- 11 --
Games are now used for many real-world purposes, including in-game marketing,
advergames, games with a purpose (GWAP), activist games, and employee training. In
Persuasive Games, Bogost (2007) argues that games can be very persuasive, affect player
opinions concerning real-world issues, and play roles in long-term social change. A
common game marketing strategy is to give players valuable virtual items as easily
achieved rewards. Edery and Mollick (2008) suggest that effective advergames offer
competitive or cooperative activities, trigger desire for reaching a goal, and support
sharing. A reward mechanism with social characteristics can help achieve advergame
design goals. There are cases in which virtual rewards are gained by purchasing physical
products. Webkinz distributes virtual pets as rewards to promote their real-world toys; the
strategy is effective because the virtual pet is easily shared with player communities for
inspection. Note that anti-advergames are being designed to put certain brands,
companies, and ideas in a bad light. These games use reward systems that set either
undesired goals or goals that can never be achieved to convey their ideas (Bogost, 2007).
Researchers have shown that reward system heuristics can be applied to workplaces. The
authors of Total Engagement (Reeves & Read, 2009) have shared insights about how
digital game elements and mechanisms can be used to improve employee performance
and satisfaction. Primary causes of employee dissatisfaction include not knowing if they
are progressing, lack of transparency in promotion routes, repetitive work, and remote
enterprise visions that are not connected to personal feelings. These ideas correspond to
certain game design shortcomings—for example, “decisions are arbitrary” (“I’m not
going to be promoted anyway”), “losing a game without knowing why” (“I don’t know
why I wasn’t promoted”), and “not knowing what to do next” (“How can I act according
to the organization’s vision?”) (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004).
Reward system designers have addressed similar problems in complex games such as
MMORPGs, whose players must perform repetitive tasks in order to collect rewards.
MMORPG guilds try their best to create systems that support meritocracies, and players
build their reputations by sharing their knowledge. It is possible to say that the
meritocracy concept is quite natural in MMORPG guilds and game societies. Game
achievement systems also separate long-term goals into sub-goals that help players
determine if they are progressing in the right direction; this idea may help mitigate
employee dissatisfaction (Reeves & Read, 2009). Games are also used to motivate people
to do real-world workfor example, Microsoft used a game to increase the number of
volunteers willing to debug its Vista product. The online game Handipoints lets parents
give virtual rewards to their children to encourage good real-world behavior (Edery &
Mollick, 2008).
Reward mechanisms have long been studied by education researchers. Early behaviorists
viewed learning as a process of reinforcement, with students taking exams on a regular
basis, getting feedback on wrong answers, and receiving rewards for correct answers. Gee
(2007) has summarized 36 learning principles when arguing that video games can be used
to support and improve teaching and learning quality. Inspired by his work, we believe
that game-like reward systems can be helpful in some non-traditional ways. In terms of
situated learning, Gee argues that it is important for learners to take on the identities of
successful characters in subject domains. Rewards can be aimed at encouraging creative
thinking when building virtual identities. It is also important to motivate learners to put in
lots of effort toward achievement. A game-like reward system may be an effective
-- 12 --
motivating tool if it reduces pressure and fear of failure, or provides alternatives to scores
as marks of meaningful success.
New technologies (e.g., mobile GPS, ad hoc communication) are being used to link game
companies with non-gaming entities. Players of Love Plus (Konami Digital Entertainment,
2009) receive game rewards when they use a Nintendo DS to travel to certain physical
locations in which local businesses have promotional agreements with the Konami game
company. Many players of Dragon Quest VI: Realms of Reverie on Nintendo DS
(ArtePiazza, 2010), are familiar with an activity known as “passing-by connection,” in
which players in close physical proximity automatically exchange data on avatars and
other game aspects. In an effort to increase sociality, rewards are also used to encourage
players to write about themselves.
In this section, we summarize our analysis on reward systems by providing some
considerations on designing a reward system.
1. Life constraint: In A Casual Revolution, Jesper Juul (2010) discusses casual games that
exert flexible demands on player skills and time commitments. Hardcore game
characteristics such as complex control interfaces and large time investment demands
prevent many people from playing hardcore games. If the target audience consists of
casual players, rewards must be accessible during short playing sessions.
2. Create autotelic experiences: Although reward systems give extrinsic reward, they can
create intrinsically rewarding experiences. An example is setting multi-level goals to
encourage players to sharpen their skills and try new ways to play, thus makes players to
learn and experience the pleasure of learning and making progress. By defining subgoals,
players are easier to immerse in the course of play.
3. Balance: It must be balanced between effort paid/ time spent and the value of reward. It
is frustrating to receive reward not valuable enough constantly. On the other hand, the
players will no longer appreciate high value rewards if they are gained relatively easy.
When a game is played by many players, inter-player balance must be considered. For
example, many MMOGs have both hardcore and casual players as target audience.
Reward systems must be carefully designed so that hardcore players have some
advantages (after all, they spend more time) while casual players can still enjoy. The
importance of balance between players buying and not buying virtual items in free-to-
play online games is similar.
4. Uncertainty and secrecy: The uncertainty itself of reward creates some fun. However, it
is not suitable for rewards which are supposed to be tightly correlated to skills like score.
In addition, for resources which are critical in clearing a stage in real-time like
ammunition and life count, players prefer them to be expectable. Secrecy like hidden
treasure and quest encourages players to dig into the game and be a contributor in the
game society or to join online discussion and search for information.
5. Accumulated vs. instant feedback: Accumulated rewards, especially those not spent in
game like experience points and virtual equipments, mark the progress of players and/or
avatars and are suitable for comparison. So this kind of reward is better in creating long-
term and social sense of achievement. Instant feedback, on the other hand, makes a game
-- 13 --
responsive and juicy. This kind of reward helps maintain attractiveness and provide
elements for flow experience.
6. Social purposes: Rewards can be used to share, compare with others, establish status,
show off, etc. For example, Reward systems that distinguish players who have advanced
skills or contribution to other players make it possible for encouraged players to establish
status while eye candies are good for both sharing and comparison. Furthermore, rewards
which can only be gained by advanced players also serve as symbols and increase group
identity of these players.
7. Physical world activities: Reward systems with support of mobile technology have
been used to encourage a range of activities; from shopping, traveling, even to taking
exercise. The idea of making players have more physical contact and do something good
for health have made more people willing to play or feeling less guilty on playing games;
just like Wii has changed the image of game playing.
In this paper we discussed reward systems from several viewpoints, including classifying
and characterizing rewards, and showing how players use them with a dual-axis model.
We analyzed the motivating aspects of reward systems, as well as how they interact with
other game mechanisms to provide positive player experiences. We also discussed how
game-inspired reward systems might motivate individuals and change their real-world
behaviors in business, teaching and learning, and other environments. We also discussed
four points regarding how reward systems provide positive experiences. First, rewards
can be used to establish status, attract attention, and build social connections with other
players, or to motivate players to collaborate when searching for secret information or
hidden items. With the addition of mobile communication technologies, reward systems
can support real-world social interactions. Second, reward systems make other game
mechanisms more enjoyable by setting goals for players (and making it feel natural for
players to set appropriate goals) while compensating for game-related boredom and
anxiety. Third, reward mechanisms can arouse curiosity and trigger the sense of fun
associated with taking chances. Fourth, they can set the stage for players to review their
collections of virtual items or achievements, even when they are not actively playing a
game. Finally, we proposed our idea about design considerations of reward systems.
ArtePiazza (2010) Dragon Quest VI: Realms of Reverie on Nintendo DS.
Bartle, R. (1996). Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD research, 1(1).
Begy, J. & Consalvo, M. (2011). Achievements, Motivations and Rewards in
Faunasphere. Game Studies, 11(1).
Blizzard Entertainment (2004) World of Warcraft
Bracken, C. C., Jeffres L. W., & Neuendorf, K. A. (2004). Criticism or Praise? The
Impact of Verbal Versus Text-Only Computer Feedback on Social Presence, Intrinsic
Motivation, and Recall. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), pp.349-357.
Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Caillois, R. (2001). Man, play and games. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Caplin, A. & Dean, M. (2008). Dopamine, Reward Prediction Error, and Economics.
Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (2), pp.663-701.
Corneliussen, H. & Rettberg, J. W. (2008). Digital culture, play, and identity: a World
of Warcraft reader. Cambridge: MIT Press.
-- 14 --
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1991). Flow: the Psychology of Optimal Experience. New
York: Harper Perennial.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and
Invention. New York: Harper Perennial.
Danet, D. and Katriel, T. (1989). No two Alike: Play and Aesthetics in Collecting. In
S. M. Pearce (Ed), Interpreting Objects and Collections. New York: Routledge.
Ducheneaut, N. & Moore, R.J. (2004). The social side of gaming: a study of
interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. In Proc. of ACM CSCW.
Eifermann, R. R. (1971). Social play in childhood. In R. E. Herron & B. Sutton-Smith
(Eds.), Child's play. New York: Wiley.
Edery, D. & Mollick, E. (2008). Changing the Game: How Video Games Are
Transforming the Future of Business. New Jersey: FT Press.
Elliott, E. & Dweck, C. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, 1, pp.5-12.
Formanek, R. (1994). Why They Collect: Collectors Reveal Their Motivations. In S.
M. Pearce (Ed), Interpreting Objects and Collections. New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The Theory of Affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (eds.),
Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guo, Y. and Barnes, S. (2007). Why People Buy Virtual Items in Virtual Worlds with
Real Money. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 38 (4), pp.69-
Hallford N. & Hallford, J. (2001). Swords and Circuitry: A designer’s guide to
computer role playing games. Roseville, CA: Prime Publishing.
Hopson, J. (2002). The Psychology of Choice. Available at:
(accessed April 2011)
Höysniemi, J. (2006). International survey on the Dace Dance Revolution game. ACM
Computers in Entertainment, 4(2), pp.1-30.
Huizinga, J. (2003). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture. New
York: Routledge.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M. and Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A Formal Approach to Game
Design and GameResearch. Challenges in Game Artificial Intelligence. 2004 AAAI
Jakobsson, M. (2011). The Achievement Machine: Understanding Xbox 360
Achievements in Gaming Practices. Game Studies, 11(1).
Konami Digital Entertainment (2009) Love Plus
Koster, R. (2005). A theory of fun for game design. Scottsdale, AZ: Paraglyph Press.
Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story.
XEODesign, Inc. Available at:
(accessed April 2011)
LeBlanc, M. (2004). Mechanics, Dynamics, Aesthetics: A Formal Approach to Game
Design. Lecture at Northwestern University, April 2004. Available at: (accessed April 2011)
Lepper, M. R. & Greene, D. (eds.) (1978). The Hidden Costs of Reward: New
Perspectives on the Psychology of Human Motivation, Hillsdale, NY: Erlbaum.
Lin, H., & Sun, C.T. (2007). Cash Trade Within the Magic Circle: Free-to-Play Game
Challenges and Massively Multiplayer Online Game Player Responses. Proceedings
of DiGRA 2007. Available at: (accessed
April 2011)
-- 15 --
Loewenstein, G. (1987). Anticipation and the Valuation of Delayed Consumption. The
Economic Journal, 97, pp.666-684.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The Psychology of Curiosity: A Review and Reinterpretation.
Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), pp.75-98.
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instructions.
Cognitive Science 5(4), pp.333-369.
Malone, T. W. (1982). Heuristics for Designing Enjoyable User Interfaces: Lessons
from Computer Games. Proceedings of the 1982 conference on Human factors in
computing systems, pp.63-68.
Microsoft Game Studios (2005) Age of Empires III
Norman, D. A. (1999). Affordance, conventions and design. Interactions, 6(3), pp.38-
Pittman, T. S., Emery, J., and Boggiano A. K. (1982). Intrinsic and Extrinsic
Motivational Orientations: Reward-Induced Changes in Preference for Complexity.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(5), pp.789-797.
Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers,
Television, and New Media Like Real People and Places. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Reeves, B. & Read, J. L. (2009). Total engagement: Using games to change the way
people work and businesses compete. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaptation and the Puzzles and Properties of Pleasure. In D.
Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic
Psychology. New York: Russell Sage.
Ryan, R., Rigby, S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games:
A self determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30, pp.347363.
Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sun, C.T., Lin, H. and Ho, C.H. (2006). Sharing Tips with Strangers: Exploiting Gift
Culture in Computer Gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5), pp.560-570.
Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The Ambiguity of Play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Yee, N. (2006). The labor of fun: how video games blur the boundaries of work and
play. Games and Culture 1, pp.6871.
Yee, N. (2007). Motivations of play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 9,
... The application of individualized MLsupported feedback and the inclusion of new learning environments (see, Ciolacu et al., 2018) are a reality that must be considered in the scientific view of a contemporary classroom situation. Smart reward systems and feedback are also part of this development (see, Wang & Sun, 2011) and in need of suitable models for analyzing the increasingly prevalent log-data to go beyond mere pre-post tests (Bimba et al., 2017). ...
Full-text available
Classical statistical methods are limited in the analysis of highdimensional datasets. Machine learning (ML) provides a powerful framework for prediction by using complex relationships, often encountered in modern data with a large number of variables, cases and potentially non-linear effects. ML has turned into one of the most influential analytical approaches of this millennium and has recently become popular in the behavioral and social sciences. The impact of ML methods on research and practical applications in the educational sciences is still limited, but continuously grows as larger and more complex datasets become available through massive open online courses (MOOCs) and large scale investigations.The educational sciences are at a crucial pivot point, because of the anticipated impact ML methods hold for the field. Here, we review the opportunities and challenges of ML for the educational sciences, show how a look at related disciplines can help learning from their experiences, and argue for a philosophical shift in model evaluation. We demonstrate how the overall quality of data analysis in educational research can benefit from these methods and show how ML can play a decisive role in the validation of empirical models. In this review, we (1) provide an overview of the types of data suitable for ML, (2) give practical advice for the application of ML methods, and (3) show how ML-based tools and applications can be used to enhance the quality of education. Additionally we provide practical R code with exemplary analyses, available at https: // only=d29ae7cf59d34e8293f4c6bbde3e4ab2.
... In correlation, the difficulty of rewards should be as much as consistent as possible amongst the users and it should be able to offer different levels, to address to different users with different background [64]. Having too difficult rewards and achievements will have the users to feel unable to act, whilst having too easy rewarding mechanisms will result in boredom [65]. In addition, different rewards will have different results in the end users in relation to their engagement. ...
Technical Report
This report provides the objectives of learning and training based on literature along with the training needs identified in D4.1 for Aviation, Naval and Power Grid sectors. It also describes the methodology used to achieve the objectives as well as the evaluation of the objective with reference to relevant literature. The findings will provide the input to inform the FORESIGHT certification programme in T4.4 and advise the innovative curricula in T4.5.
... Furthermore, other game design elements such as progress or competition depending on both the perceptible aspect of the design at the surface level and the underlying mechanics should be easily implemented and independently manipulated by the game designer, thus enabling detection of their specific effects (Bedwell et al., 2012). Consequently, manipulating the game design elements occurring at the surface level is easier than those related with functions or those triggering user experiences: First, Points present in games and gamified applications, as rewarding for successful achievement of intended activities within the gamified environment; they allow measurement of player's behavior, since they similarly serve as feedback environment (Werbach & Hunter, 2012Sailer et al., 2013); Second, Badges they consist visual representation of achievements, symbolizing merits, providing feedback, however, they have no narrative meaning, yet they symbolize the user's membership to the group owning the badge thus, exerting social influence (Wang & Sun, 2011;Antin& Churchill, 2011;Hamari, 2013); Third Leaderboards they rank players best performance based on a certain success criterion, acting as competitive indicators, however, their motivational potential is mixed. They can exhibit opposite effect by acting as effective motivators when the user is close to the top end and become demotivators when they are still lagging in the bottom. ...
Full-text available
Introduction: Gamification has recently gained popularity as a technology promoting the users psychological motivations towards a service, activity, product or a brand. Different design characteristics of the design elements have been described as motivating and supporting individual attitude and behaviour. However, scarcity in empirical evidence answering the people drive to use gamification in the marketing field still represents a gap in the literature. Aim: the present study aims at proposing a prototype of a gamified framework specially developed for testing the effect of gamification on brand engagement according to UX designs using different game elements. Materials & methods: this is a pilot study targeting customers of gamification website. The data was collected through evaluating the relationship between the user experience and the game elements and their effect on utilitarian and hedonic motivations. Holistic evaluation of the whole gameful experience and its influence on customer attitude in regards to more brand enhanced engagement was further assessed. Results: evidence of a positive relationship was statistically highly significant between the proposed framework and the studied variables, in conjunction with player personality as an important moderating factor. Conclusion: The results proved that customer attitude towards a brand can be affected during a gameful experience and will eventually result in positive active enhanced brand engagement.
... These components can be grouped broadly into those related to providing feedback, those related to social influence, and those related to adaptive difficulty. While utilizing gamification in health interventions remains a novel approach, with limited formal evaluation [52], early evidence suggests the benefits are manifold. ...
Full-text available
As robots become more advanced and capable, developing trust is an important factor of human-robot interaction and cooperation. However, as multiple environmental and social factors can influence trust, it is important to develop more elaborate scenarios and methods to measure human-robot trust. A widely used measurement of trust in social science is the investment game. In this study, we propose a scaled-up, immersive, science fiction Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) scenario for intrinsic motivation on human-robot collaboration, built upon the investment game and aimed at adapting the investment game for human-robot trust. For this purpose, we utilize two Neuro-Inspired COmpanion (NICO) - robots and a projected scenery. We investigate the applicability of our space mission experiment design to measure trust and the impact of non-verbal communication. We observe a correlation of 0.43 ( p = 0.02 ) between self-assessed trust and trust measured from the game, and a positive impact of non-verbal communication on trust ( p = 0.0008 ) and robot perception for anthropomorphism ( p = 0.007 ) and animacy ( p = 0.00002 ). We conclude that our scenario is an appropriate method to measure trust in human-robot interaction and also to study how non-verbal communication influences a human's trust in robots.
A new form of sports platforms transfers traditional sports like cycling into a virtual world and lets users socialize, exercise or compete with each other. Despite the increasing public attention, there is no research on motivational factors of this advanced mixed-reality tech-nology allowing virtual-mediated physical interaction. Therefore, we proposed a research model and tested it using structural equation modelling combined with qualitative inter-views to investigate the platform’s usage. Our results reveal that utilitarian benefits relate to the task-purposes of health consciousness and training, while hedonic benefits relate to training, customizing and socializing. Hedonic benefits are more strongly related to use in-tention than utilitarian, but subgroup-specific differences are observed. Privacy concerns constitute a risk for all users to continued use of these platforms, while cheating is relevant only for competitive users. Use intention positively relates to actual use behavior in the form of usage time, number of races and followed users.
Professionalised competitive digital gaming or ‘esports’ has grown to a point where millions of dollars are being awarded in competitions watched globally by tens of millions of viewers. Previous analyses of the phenomenon have examined the role(s) of labour in esports performed by various actors – players, tournament organisers, sponsors, game developers – but these have yet to be unified into a ‘big picture’ of esports labour, especially when considering the relationships between the labour performed by different esports actors. In this paper we therefore present a comprehensive overview of the labour that different actors within the emerging Esports ecosystem perform, and how they intersect and influence each other in order to contribute to the existence of this highly contemporary phenomenon. In doing so we show that the rapid growth of Esports has created new labour processes and forms of work, transformed existing ones, yielded new career options, and tremendous profits to be made by a range of involved actors. Esports’ emerging position as a major global industry both within gaming and within contemporary media more broadly demands close attention to its work, its workers, and who is winning and losing in this dynamic media space.
Introduction The incorporation of serious games in higher education has shown improvement in student engagement and motivation to learn. Research that explores local pharmacy student preferences of gamification aspects of serious games is scarce. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate local pharmacy student experience, preference, and perceptions of gaming and game-based learning. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing self-administered questionnaires among pharmacy students in Malaysia. Descriptive statistics, the Mann–Whitney test, the Kruskal–Wallis test, and the Spearman's correlation test were used for analysis. Results A total of 328 pharmacy students enrolled in this study, and 84.1% (n = 276) had video game experience. Students usually played video games using mobile phones (n = 231, 70%). Pharmacy students showed positive perceptions regarding serious games with a mean score of 3.69. However, limited awareness and knowledge of serious games was observed among pharmacy students. The most preferred game genres were role-playing and strategy (n = 174, 53%). Pharmacy students also preferred playing a cooperative game style (n = 113, 34.5%) with scores as a reward system (n = 204, 62.6%). Over three quarters (n = 292, 89.3%) wanted to see the results of the assessment after the game. Conclusions This research provided information on serious games preferences of local pharmacy students. Further study should evaluate the acceptance and effectiveness of the implementation of serious games among pharmacy students in Malaysia.
Xbox Live achievements and gamerscores have become an integral part of Xbox 360 gaming. Based on the framework provided by Microsoft, the community has developed intriguing gaming practices where the individual games become pieces of a larger whole. This paper, based on a two year community study, explores how players have reacted and adapted to the system. To get at this shift in console gaming, the achievement system is seen as a massively multiplayer online game (MMO) where separate achievements are the functional equivalent of quests. By conceptualizing the achievement system as an MMO, the paper questions the dichotomy between PC/MMO and console gaming. The paper also goes into detailed descriptions of gaming habits and strategies that have emerged as gamers appropriate the achievement system, in particular looking at three player types: achievement casuals, hunters and completists. My conclusions are that the Xbox Live achievement system only partially functions as a reward system. More importantly, in terms of impact on player practices, it is an invisible MMO that all Xbox Live members participate in, whether they like it or not. On one hand, the different strategies and ways of conceptualizing the system shows how players have appropriated the technology and rules provided by Microsoft, and socially constructed systems that fit their play styles. On the other hand, many players are deeply conflicted over these gaming habits and feel trapped in a deterministic system that dictates ways of playing the games that they do not enjoy. Both sides can ultimately be connected to distinguishable characteristics of gamers. As a group, they are known to take pleasure in fighting, circumventing and subverting rigid rule systems, but also to be ready to take on completely arbitrary challenges without questioning their validity.
This volume brings together for the first time the most significant papers on the interpretation of objects and collections and examines how people relate to material culture and why they collect things. The first section of the book discusses the interpretation of objects, setting the philosophical and historical context of object interpretation. Papers are included which discuss objects variously as historical documents, functioning material, and as semiotic texts, as well as those which examine the politics of objects and the methodology of object study. The second section, on the interpretation of collections, looks at the study of collections in their historical and conceptual context. Many topics are covered such as the study of collecting to structure individual identity, its affect on time and space and the construction of gender. There are also papers discussing collection and ideology, collection and social action and the methodology of collection study. This unique anthology of articles and extracts will be of inestimable value to all students and professionals involved in the interpretation of objects and collections.
This study tested a framework in which goals are proposed to be central determinants of achievement patterns. Learning goals, in which individuals seek to increase their competence, were predicted to promote challenge-seeking and a mastery-oriented response to failure regardless of perceived ability. Performance goals, in which individuals seek to gain favorable judgments of their competence or avoid negative judgments, were predicted to produce challenge-avoidance and learned helplessness when perceived ability was low and to promote certain forms of risk-avoidance even when perceived ability was high. Manipulations of relative goal value (learning vs. performance) and perceived ability (high vs. low) resulted in the predicted differences on measures of task choice, performance during difficulty, and spontaneous verbalizations during difficulty. Particularly striking was the way in which the performance goal-low perceived ability condition produced the same pattern of strategy deterioration, failure attribution, and negative affect found in naturally occurring learned helplessness. Implications for theories of motivation and achievement are discussed.
A persistent topic in MMO studies is player motivation: why do players play? Attempts to answer this question have resulted in several frameworks, but these are built from studies of games that are very similar to each other. MMOs tend to feature fictional worlds drawn from common fantasy and science fiction tropes, and gameplay tends to focus on continually improving one’s personal power through leveling up a character and finding new equipment. This in turn has shaped how we interpret player activity. However, casual games developer Big Fish Game’s first MMO, Faunasphere, breaks several of these tropes. Players are cast as “caretakers” of small animals, referred to as “fauna,” and must guide them through the world while improving their home and keeping them happy. The game is almost entirely nonviolent, and the reward for leveling up is not a gain in personal power, but rather an egg used to hatch a new creature to care for. This study examines the players of Faunasphere to determine who they are, what their backgrounds are, and what motivates them to continue playing. We argue that while their motivations seem to fit traditional frameworks, the nature of player activity (as defined by the game’s fiction) is significantly different. This is due in part to the game’s reward structure, which is designed to continually reinforce the player’s position as caretaker: every reward in the game either can be or must be used to further care for one’s fauna. We conclude with a call for greater contextualization when discussing concepts such as reward and achievement: as Faunasphere shows, the fictional world of a game has a strong impact on how players interpret their in-game activities.