ChapterPDF Available

Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions for Type 2 Diabetes: Diets, Botanicals, Antioxidants, Minerals, and Other Dietary Supplements

  • P and N Development Ventures

Abstract and Figures

This is a up-to-date, comprehensive review of natural product-based dietary interventions for type 2 diabetes.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Diets and Dietary Supplements (Botanicals, Antioxidants, and Minerals)
Joseph L. Evans, Ph.D., , P & N Development Ventures, Saint Louis, MO USA
Mi-Kyung Bahng, Ph.D., ESM Technologies, Springfield, MO USA
Chapter revised: February 5, 2014
Diabetes has reached epidemic proportions throughout the world: 8.3% of adults – 382 million
people have diabetes, and the number of people with the disease is set to rise beyond 592 million
in less than 25 years ( Furthermore,
the prevalence of insulin resistance, a major causative factor in the early development of type 2
diabetes (T2D) and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and the insulin resistance
syndrome (also known as the metabolic syndrome), is even more widespread [1-3]. Recent data
(1999-2010) indicate that the prevalence of the insulin resistance syndrome among US adults (≥20
years of age) is approximately 25% of the population [4]; the International Diabetes Federation has
reported an identical figure for the worldwide prevalence in adults (
This situation is further exacerbated by obesity, a major risk factor for developing T2D and
cardiovascular disease. Results from the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination
Survey (NHANES), using measured heights and weights, indicate that an estimated 33.0% of U.S.
adults aged 20 and over are overweight, 35.7% are obese, and 6.3% are extremely obese
( According to
the World Health Organization (WHO), the worldwide prevalence of obesity has nearly doubled
between 1980 and 2008. In 2008, 10% of men and 14% of women in the world were obese (BMI
≥30 kg/m2), compared with 5% for men and 8% for women in 1980. An estimated 205 million men
and 297 million women over the age of 20 were obese – a total of more than half a billion adults
worldwide ( Since dietary modification
and increased physical activity provide insufficient glucose control over the long-term course of the
disease, the vast majority of patients require some type of pharmacological intervention [5;6].
Pharmacological options for the management of T2D have been increasing, and will continue to do
so [5;7;8], ( cost of prescription medications
may exceed the financial capacity of older citizens, those without adequate health insurance, and
those living in poverty [9;10]. Certain ethnic groups who are at increased risk for developing
diabetes (e.g. Asians, Hispanics, and Native Americans), come from cultures with a long history of
use of traditional medicines, and are likely to employ one or more folk (botanical) treatments rather
than prescription medications [11-20]. Though a majority of diabetic patients are being treated,
many are unable to achieve the current American Diabetes Association-recommended goal of
HbA1c < 7%. For these reasons, it is appropriate to identify and evaluate adjunctive options in the
light of available evidence, as to whether they are safe and to any extent effective. This
presentation does not recommend or endorse their use. We emphasize that almost no data is
available on long-term outcomes (safety or efficacy) with these agents or on their cost
Regulatory Overview
Botanical extracts, vitamins, antioxidants, minerals, amino acids, and fatty acids (natural products
collectively and interchangeably referred to here as dietary supplements or nutraceuticals) are a
potential source of therapies for T2D and insulin resistance (
These agents are marketed in the US as specified by the Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act (DSHEA), passed by the US Congress in 1994. DSHEA defined a new category of
food for regulatory purposes, termed dietary supplements, one that also includes concentrates,
metabolites, constituents, extracts, and combinations, and has resulted in major changes in the
marketing and use of dietary supplements in the US (see below).
From a regulatory perspective, nutraceuticals are treated differently compared to either over-the-
counter (OTC) or prescription pharmaceuticals [21-23]. DSHEA strictly requires manufacturers of
botanicals and nutraceuticals to clearly state on all product labels that it is not intended to
diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Statements can be made to suggest that a dietary
supplement enhances general health, or refers to a documented biochemical or physiological
mechanism whereby a supplement affects a structure or function. These claims are commonly
referred to as structure/function claims (e.g. supports cardiovascular health, supports immune
function, supports joint function, etc.). In contrast to the regulatory requirements for OTC and
prescription pharmaceuticals, manufacturers of dietary supplements are not required, under
DSHEA, to submit evidence of safety or efficacy prior to marketing. Although a dietary supplement
manufacturer is ultimately responsible for the safety of its products, the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) bears the burden of proof to show that a product is unsafe. To remove a
product from the market, the FDA must be convinced and show evidence that the product (or
ingredient contained in a product) possesses an undue risk of harm at the indicated dose [24].
For example, the increased risk for adverse events by ephredra-containing products compared
with other botanicals and nutraceuticals resulted in the FDA’s decision to remove ephredra-
containing products from the market in 2004 [22;24-26]. More recently (2013), the FDA announced
a ban on all products containing DMAA (also known as 1,3-dimethylamylamine, methylhexanamine
or geranium extract), a thermogenic agent. Ingestion of DMAA can elevate blood pressure and
lead to cardiovascular problems ranging from shortness of breath and tightening in the chest to
heart attack
A detailed comparison of the regulatory requirements of dietary supplements, OTC, and
prescription medications has been published [23]. In addition to market withdrawal, FDA frequently
takes action to prevent makers of these “supplements” from advertising unproven benefits.
Dietary Supplement Market
Figure 1. Demograpic profile of US adults reporting taking dietary supplements.
Source: Council of Responsible Nutrition (CRN) Market Research Report (September 20, 2013).
Despite the caveat emptor atmosphere surrounding dietary supplements [21], they are
enthusiastically used by more than 68% of American adults (Figure 2) .
Dietary supplements are a $35 billion market that's growing at a rate of 7.6 percent. Common
motivations are to stay healthy (e.g. multi-vitamins, vitamin D, calcium and omega-3 fatty acids)
lose weight, and to avoid the use of prescription medications. Recent surveys indicate that
individuals are attracted to lower-calorie diets (especially less carbohydrates), less gluten, less
meat, more exercise, more self-care, fewer doctor visits, and less reliance on conventional
medicine. In response to these current trends, there has been a measurable increase in new
product launches and product development activities and continued growth in gut health
(especially probiotics) and omega-3 fatty acids
12/view_features/state-of-the-industry-review-forecast/). The emerging areas of bone/joint health
and glycemic control remain strong, and are poised to be significant categories for years to come.
According to Nutrition Business Journal (NBJ), dietary supplements accounted for one-fourth of all
of the U.S. nutrition industry sales in 2010. The dietary supplement industry experienced a growth
rate of ~5% from 2000 to 2010 and has added over $10 billion dollars in annual sales over that
period of time (
files/ Consumer sales of dietary
supplements were $23.7 billion in 2007, $26.7 billion in 2009, and surpassed $30 billion in 2011
sales, growing 7% annually in a return to performance levels not seen since before the economic
downturn. This represents $2 billion in incremental sales in 2011 from year-ago levels and points
toward the escalating interest in supplementation. Overall, the dietary supplement industry has
continued to show growth despite a generally weak economy, and continued regulatory issues
have been a major influence in 2012. NBJ predicts that the market will continue to grow as shown
in Figure 2, although growth rates for many product categories within the dietary supplement
industry experienced diminished growth from previous years.
Figure 2. U.S. Dietary Supplement Sales & Growth, 2000-2017e.
Source: Nutrition Business Journal estimates. ($mil., consumer sales) "Global Supplement &
Nutrition Industry Report," Nutrition Business Journal, pp. 1-15, 2012.
Figure 3 shows U.S. dietary supplement sales (2011) broken out by product categories: it consists
of 34% Vitamins, 17% Herbs and Botanicals, 12% Sports Nutrition, 10% Meal Replacements, 8%
Minerals, and 19% Specialty and Others. Two categories, sports nutrition and meal replacements,
clearly outperformed the other categories, as both exhibited double-digit growth during 2011. The
unifying theme here is that protein has successfully averted the slings and arrows levied against its
peers, fats and carbs, over recent years. The ‘specialty ingredient’ category of dietary supplements
also experienced respectable growth in 2011 thanks to continued advances from the industry’s
major archetype ingredients—Omega-3s and Probiotics. The dietary supplement represents about
25% of the total U.S. nutrition industry, as shown in Table 1 below.
Figure 3. U.S. Dietary Supplement Sales (% of total) in 2011 by Product Categories.
Source: Nutrition Business Journal estimates (
Table 1. U.S. Dietary Supplements vs. Total Nutrition Industry, 2000-20
Source: Nutrition Business Journal estimates ("Global Supplement & Nutrition Industry Report,"
Nutrition Business Journal, pp. 1-15, 2012.).
In 2010, almost 23 million households in the US had a member coping with diabetes, according to
Symphony IRI’s 2010 “OTC Medication Report,” which estimated the annual sales potential for
diabetes related OTC, drugs, and dietary supplements at $3.4 billion (M. Becker, "The Blood
Sugar Market Goes Boom!," Nutraceutical World Magazine, 1 October 2012). The dietary
supplement share of this impressive market has been estimated at $126 million (2012) with a
predicted growth to $240 million by 2019. Furthermore, the ADA estimates that there are 19 million
Americans who have been diagnosed with either T1D or T2D (Table 2). Those people, along with
the estimated 7 million who are undiagnosed, are costing the U.S. $116 billion annually to treat.
According to Escondido, CA-based Sloan Trends.
Table 2. Diabetes & Prediabetes Cases in the U.S.
Source: American Diabetes Association [27]
A nationally (US) representative survey has reported that over 30% of patients with diabetes used
complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to manage their condition [28]; in certain ethnic
populations with diabetes (Navajo, Vietnamese, Hispanic), the percentages are even higher (40-
66%)[18;29-31]. A more recent study has reported that the prevalence of pharmacologic and non-
pharmacologic CAM among 806 participants with diabetes patients was 81.9% and 80.3%,
respectively [32]. Overall, CAM prevalence was similar for Caucasians (94.2%), African Americans
(95.5%), Hispanics (95.6%) and Native Americans (95.2%) and lower in Pacific Islanders/others
(83.9%) and Asians (87.8%). Pharmacologic CAM prevalence was positively associated with
education (P=0.001). The presence of diabetes was a powerful predictor of CAM use. Several
significant ethnic differences were observed in specific forms of CAM use. Hispanics reported
using frequently prickly pear (nopal; see below) to complement their diabetes treatment, while
Caucasians more commonly used multivitamins.
In response to the increasing use of CAM by the general public [33] and by patients with diabetes
[28], the American Diabetes Association has issued a ‘position paper’ calling on health care
providers to ask their patients about their use of CAM [34]. The National Center of Complementary
and Alternative Medicine website (part of the US National Institutes of Health) is an excellent
source of credible information regarding the use of dietary supplements in individuals with T2D
Due to the increasing use of dietary supplements and functional foods by individuals with diabetes
along with the potential for positive (and negative) impact, it is important, therefore, that diabetes
health care professionals increase their knowledge of these agents [21;35]. To this end, several
recent comprehensive reviews have focused on the use of botanicals and dietary supplements for
diabetes [17;36-39]. The overall objective of this chapter is to provide a concise, comparative
overview of those botanicals and other dietary supplements that have received the most scientific
and, especially, clinical attention.
Dietary modification is universally recognized by caregivers as an initial intervention and mainstay
for the treatment of overweight patients with T2D [40] [41-43]. The other side of the non-
pharmacological intervention ‘coin’ involves changes in lifestyle, usually consisting of increased
physical activity [44], smoking cessation, and reduced intake of alcohol. The overall objectives of
these approaches are 1) weight loss and exercise training both resulting in improved insulin action,
2) improved glycemic and lipid control (both short-term and chronic), 3) reduced likelihood of
developing microvascular and macrovascular complications, and 4) improved quality of life. It is
important to remember that patients do not have to achieve their ideal body weight to reap
significant health benefit. It has been reported that a loss of 10-20 lb (4.5-9 kg) will be helpful, as
long as the weight loss and exercise programs are maintained [45-47].
In patients with impaired glucose tolerance, dietary changes to ensure some degree of weight loss
coupled with physical activity, is clinically effective and cost effective in reducing the progression to
T2D [48].
The recommendations of the American Diabetes Association [49], the American Association of
Clinical Endocrinologists [50], along with those from several other professional organizations
( for the nutritional management of patients with
T2D are provided elsewhere and will not be discussed in detail herein. The key to successful
dietary intervention is to ensure that caloric intake is less than caloric output. For long-term
success, this should be coupled with education designed to improve the patient’s understanding of
the beneficial effects of dietary modification on blood glucose, lipids, blood pressure, and overall
quality of life. Some successful dietary approaches have included those designed to limit intake of
saturated fats (< 7% of total caloric intake), and spreading the nutrient load. Dietary factors that are
able to spread the nutrient load include increased frequency of food intake, increased intake of
soluble fiber, legumes, and increased intake of foods with a low glycemic index. The beneficial role
that supplements and foodstuffs high in soluble fiber play in the conventional dietary management
of patients with T2D is well documented [51-54].
According to the ADA, it is unlikely that there is an optimal mix of macronutrients for the ‘diabetic
diet’. The best mix of carbohydrate, protein, and fat appears to vary depending on individual
circumstances. The best mix should provide a total caloric intake that facilitates, at the very
minimum, weight maintenance and ideally weight loss. The average daily intake of carbohydrates
recommended for patients with diabetes is approximately 45-65% of total caloric intake; low or
restricted carbohydrate diets are not recommended in the management of diabetes. Intake of fat
should be limited to approximately 20-35%; and dietary cholesterol should be < 200 mg/day. In
patients with dyslipidemia, a special effort should be made to limit saturated fat and to substitute
unsaturated or monounsaturated fat, especially omega-3 fatty acids. To reduce the risk of stroke
and cardiovascular disease, diets high (3-6 servings per day) in fruits and vegetables are highly
recommended [55-57]. Emerging epidemiological data suggests that higher coffee intake may
reduce the risk for the development of T2D [58]. Protein intake (in patients with normal renal
function) should be limited to 10-20% of total caloric intake, and reduced to 10-15% at the onset of
macroalbuminuria. In addition to their beneficial effects on plasma lipids, a meta-analysis of
randomized controlled clinical trials concluded that diets high in soluble fiber provided by either
whole foods (up to 43 g/d) or dietary supplementation (up to 15 g/d) reduced absolute values of
glycated HbA1c by 0.55%, and fasting plasma glucose by ~ 10.0 mg/dl [59].
With regard to micronutrient supplementation, the ADA does not recommend routine
supplementation with any vitamin, mineral, or antioxidant in patients with diabetes who do not have
an underlying deficiency [49]. The basis for this position is the lack of clear evidence of efficacy
and, in some cases, a concern related to long-term safety [57;60-63]. With regard to alcohol intake,
patients with diabetes are advised to follow the same precautions as the general population. Daily
intake should be limited to a moderate amount (one drink per day or less for women, and two
drinks per day or less for men). In those patients using insulin or insulin au alcohol should be
consumed with food to reduce the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Alcohol alone does not acutely
affect blood glucose or insulin but, if co-ingested with carbohydrate, could raise glucose [49].
The ADA has recently released (October 10, 2013) a new position statement regarding the
nutritional management of adults with diabetes [64]. This statement provides an updated set of
recommendations based on a review of recent scientific and clinical evidence. Briefly, the updated
recommendations call for all adults diagnosed with diabetes to consume a variety of nutrient-dense
foods in appropriate portion sizes as part of individualized eating plans that takes into account
personal nutrition preferences, lifestyle, culture, religion, and metabolic goals. In selecting
personalized eating plan, people with diabetes should be sure to consider individual metabolic
goals, including their glucose and lipid levels, along with their blood pressure. According to the
ADA, current evidence does not conclusively support one type of diet over another (e.g.,
Mediterranean, vegetarian, low carbohydrate). A primary objective is to identify an eating pattern
that fits an individual’s food preferences and lifestyle, that can be followed consistently, and offers
macro- and micronutrients necessary for good health [64]. Importantly, people with diabetes are
advised to limit or avoid altogether intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (especially those
containing high-fructose corn syrup) to reduce the risk for weight gain and worsening of the
cardiovascular profile.
Mediterranean Diet
Perhaps the most widely recognized diet with health promoting benefits is the so-called
Mediterranean Diet. Around 50 years ago, it was recognized by Keys and associates that very low
incidences of cardiovascular disease in the areas around Naples, Italy, were associated with what
was soon to be termed the Mediterranean Diet [65]. The heart of this diet is mainly vegetarian, and
differs from North American and Western European diets in that it is much lower in meat and dairy
products, and frequently contains fruits for dessert. This diet reflects a pattern of eating most highly
associated with olive growing areas of the Mediterranean. Olive oil is a critical component of this
diet both because of its inherent benefits (presence of mono unsaturated fat, i.e. oleic acid) along
with allowing for the consumption of high quantities of fruits and vegetables in salads and other
prepared foods. Other essential components of this diet are fish (a rich source of omega-3 fatty
acids; see Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Fatty Acid section below), nuts, wheat, grapes, and
derived products including wine [66]. Many studies have convincingly demonstrated that this
dietary pattern plays an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease [67-74].
Chocolate—What’s for Dessert?
As discussed above, there is a growing body of epidemiological evidence supporting the idea that
diets rich in fruits and vegetables reduce or delay the onset of many chronic diseases, including
cardiovascular and related metabolic diseases [75]. A major class of compounds present in fruits
and vegetables that is associated with cardio-protective effects is the flavanols [76]. Cocoa is also
rich source of flavanols, a class of polyphenolic antioxidant compounds (e.g. (-)-epicatechin, (+)-
catechin, procyanidins) found in plants [76]. In addition to their antioxidant activity, flavanols have
also been associated with increased in nitric oxide bioavailability [77;78]. Consumption of
chocolate can result in significant increases in plasma epicatechin concentrations and decreases in
plasma baseline oxidation products [79]. Since nitric oxide bioavailability deeply influences insulin-
stimulated glucose uptake and vascular tone, flavanols have been evaluated for potential positive
metabolic and pressor effects. Flavanoid-rich dark chocolate (100g) improved endothelial function
and was associated with an increase in plasma epicatechin concentrations in healthy adults
The effects of either dark or white chocolate bars on blood pressure and glucose and insulin
responses to an oral-glucose-tolerance test in healthy subjects was compared [81]. After a 7-day
cocoa-free run-in phase, 15 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive for 15 days either
100 g dark chocolate bars, which contained approximately 500 mg polyphenols, or 90 g white
chocolate bars, which contained no polyphenols. Successively, subjects entered a further cocoa-
free washout phase of 7 days, and then were crossed over to the other condition. Oral glucose
tolerance tests were performed at the end of each period to calculate the homeostasis model
assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index
(QUICKI); blood pressure was measured daily. HOMA-IR was significantly lower after dark than
after white chocolate ingestion (0.94 ± 0.42 compared with 1.72 ± 0.62; P < 0.001), and QUICKI
was significantly higher after dark than after white chocolate ingestion (0.398 ± 0.04 compared with
0.356 ± 0.02; P = 0.001). Although within normal values, systolic blood pressure was lower after
dark than after white chocolate ingestion (107.5 ± 8.6 compared with 113.9 ± 8.4 mm Hg; P <
0.05). These results suggest that dark but not white chocolate decreases blood pressure and
improves insulin sensitivity in healthy persons.
These same researchers have also evaluated the effects of dark chocolate (DC) consumption on
blood pressure (BP), flow-mediated dilation (FMD), oral glucose tolerance (OGTT), and insulin
sensitivity in patients with essential hypertension (EH) [82]. After a 7-day chocolate-free run-in
phase, 20 never-treated, grade I patients with EH (10 males; 43.7 ± 7.8 years) were randomized to
receive either 100 g per day DC (containing 88 mg flavanols) or 90 g per day flavanol-free white
chocolate (WC) in an isocaloric manner for 15 days. After a second 7-day chocolate-free period,
patients were crossed over to the other treatment. Noninvasive 24-hour ambulatory BP, FMD,
OGTT, serum cholesterol, and markers of vascular inflammation were evaluated at the end of each
treatment. The HOMA-IR, QUICKI, and insulin sensitivity index (SI) were calculated from OGTT
values. Ambulatory BP decreased after DC (24-hour systolic BP -11.9 ± 7.7 mm Hg, P < 0.0001;
24-hour diastolic BP -8.5 ± 5.0 mm Hg, P < 0.0001), but not WC. DC but not WC decreased
HOMA-IR (P < 0.0001), and it improved QUICKI, SI, and FMD. DC also decreased serum LDL
cholesterol (from 3.4 ± 0.5 to 3.0 ± 0.6 mmol/L; P<0.05). In summary, DC decreased BP and serum
LDL cholesterol, improved FMD, and enhanced insulin sensitivity in patients with EH. Additional
studies in larger groups and in individuals with T2D will be needed to confirm these results.
Botanicals have been used for medicinal purposes since the dawn of civilization [83]. It is well
documented [20] that many pharmaceuticals commonly used today are structurally derived from
natural compounds found in traditional medicinal plants. The development of the anti-
hyperglycemic drug metformin (dimethlybiguanide; Glucophage®) can be traced to the traditional
use of Galega officinalis to treat diabetes, and the subsequent search to identify active compounds
with reduced toxicity [84-86]. G. officinalis is far from the only botanical to have been used as a
treatment for diabetes. Chinese medical books written as early as 3000 B.C. spoke of diabetes and
described therapies for this disease [87;88]. These historical accounts reveal that T2D existed long
ago, and medicinal plants have been used for many millennia to treat this disease. To date, the
anti-diabetic activities of well over 1200 traditional plants has been reported, although scant few
have been subjected to rigorous scientific evaluation for safety and efficacy in humans [87;89-93].
This section will provide a brief overview of those botanicals used for diabetes that have received
the most scientific attention, have been evaluated for their anti-diabetic effects in individuals with
diabetes, and are deserving of additional evaluation. See Table 3 for a summary of this
Ipomoea batatas (Caiapo)
Caiapo is derived from the skin of a variety of white sweet potato of South American origin,
Ipomoea batatas, which is cultivated in a mountainous region in Kagawa Prefecture, Japan. It has
been eaten raw for centuries in the belief that it is effective for anemia, hypertension, and diabetes.
Caiapo is commercially available throughout Japan without prescription, and used for the
prevention and treatment of T2D. In rodents, caiapo exhibits anti-diabetic activity, and the active
component is thought to be a high-molecular weight acid glycoprotein [94;95].
A beneficial effect of caiapo on glycemic control has been reported in several clinical studies. In a
pilot study, a total of 18 male patients with T2D (age: 58 ± 8 years; weight: 88 ± 3 kg; BMI: 27.7 ±
2.7 kg/m2; means ± SEM) treated by diet alone were randomized to receive placebo (n = 6) or 2
(low dose; n = 6) or 4 g (high dose; n = 6) caiapo (four tablets each containing 168 or 336 mg
powdered white-skinned sweet potato, respectively) before breakfast, lunch, and dinner for 6 weeks
[96]. At the end of treatment, no statistically significant changes in fasting glucose, insulin, or lipids
occurred in either the low-dose caiapo or placebo groups. In the group treated with the high dose
caiapo, fasting plasma glucose (-13%) as well as cholesterol [total (-10.5%) and LDL (-13%)
cholesterol] were significantly decreased (P < 0.05, compared to baseline). Body weight and blood
pressure remained unchanged in all three groups. In patients receiving low-dose caiapo, insulin
sensitivity (SI) increased by 37% (2.02 ± 0.70 vs. 2.76 ± 0.89 104 min-1 · µU–1 · ml–1, P < 0.05); in
those on high-dose caiapo, the FSIGT demonstrated an increase of SI by 42% (1.21 ± 0.32 vs. 1.73
± 0.40 104 min-1 · µU–1 · ml–1, P < 0.03). No changes were seen for SI in patients receiving placebo
(1.52 ± 0.28 vs. 1.35 ± 0.21 104 min-1 · µU–1 · ml–1). Glucose tolerance was significantly increased
(~72%; P < 0.02) in the high-dose group [97]. No adverse events were reported.
The results of this pilot study have been confirmed in a randomized, double-blind placebo
controlled trial [98]. A total of 61 patients with T2D treated by diet were given 4 g caiapo (n = 30;
mean age 55.2 ± 2.1 years; BMI 28.0 ± 0.4 kg/m2) or placebo (n = 31; mean age 55.6 ± 1.5 years;
BMI 27.6 ± 0.3 kg/m2) once daily for 12 weeks. Each subject underwent a 75-g oral glucose
tolerance test (OGTT) at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 months to assess 2-h glucose levels.
Additionally, fasting blood glucose, HbA1C, total cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were measured.
Fasting blood glucose levels decreased in the caiapo group (143.7 ± 1.9 vs. 128.5 ± 1.7 mg/dl; P <
0.001), and remained unchanged in the placebo group (144.3 ± 1.9 vs. 138.2 ± 2.1 mg/dl; P =
0.052). In the caiapo group, HbA1C decreased significantly (-0.53%; P < 0.001) from 7.21 ± 0.15 to
6.68 ± 0.14%, and remained unchanged in the placebo group (7.04 ± 0.17 vs. 7.10 ± 0.19%; P =
0.23). Two-hour glucose levels were significantly (P < 0.001) decreased in the caiapo group (193.3
± 10.4 vs. 162.8 ± 8.2 mg/dl) compared with the placebo group (191.7 ± 9.2 vs. 181.0 ± 7.1 mg/dl).
Mean cholesterol at the end of the treatment was significantly lower in the caiapo group (214.6 ±
11.2 mg/dl) than in the placebo group (248.7 ± 11.2 mg/dl; P < 0.05). A decrease in body weight
was observed in both the placebo group (P = 0.0027), and in the caiapo group (P < 0.0001); in the
caiapo group, body weight was related to the improvement in glucose control (r = 0.618; P <
0.0002). No significant changes in triglyceride levels or blood pressure were observed.
Unfortunately, possible effects on fasting insulin, C-peptide, or insulin sensitivity were not reported
in this study. Caiapo was well tolerated without significant adverse effects. This study confirms the
results of the pilot with regard to the beneficial effects of caiapo on short-tem glycemic control (as
well as cholesterol levels) and documents the efficacy of caiapo on long-term glycemic control in
patients with T2D. The magnitude of the effect of caiapo at reducing HbA1c (-0.53% absolute
decrease) is comparable with that of Acarbose, an approved oral anti-hyperglycemic medication
[99], although it falls short of what has been suggested as the minimal acceptable level for a new
anti-hyperglycemic medication (-0.7% absolute decrease) [100]. It will be of interest and important
to see if the results of this outcome with caiapo can be confirmed in other well designed clinical
trials, and to establish that caiapo does not exhibit any adverse interaction with existing anti-
hyperglycemic medication.
More recent work evaluating individuals with T2D using a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical
trial design has shown that Caiapo exerted beneficial effects on glycemic control (including HbA1c)
in patients with T2DM after 5 months follow-up. Improvement of insulin sensitivity was
accompanied by increased levels of adiponectin and a decrease in fibrinogen. Thus, Caiapo may
be considered as natural insulin sensitizer with potential but so far unproven anti-atherogenic
properties [101].
Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fenugreek)
Trigonella foenum-graecum, also known as fenugreek, is an herb native to southeastern Europe,
northern Africa, and western Asia, but is also widely cultivated in other parts of the world [102].
Fenugreek has a long history of traditional use in both Ayurvedic [holistic system of healing which
originated among the Brahmin (Hindu priestly caste) sages of ancient India and Nepal
approximately 3000 - 5000 years ago] and Chinese medicine [103], and has been widely used for
the treatment of diabetes [104] [91]. The defatted seeds of the fenugreek plant contain ~50% fiber
(similar to guar gum), along with a variety of bioactive saponins, alkaloids, coumarins, and 4-
hydroxyisoleucine, the principle bioactive compound [90;91]. This latter compound exhibits
insulinotropic activity [105-107]; following a 6-day sub-chronic administration, 4-hydroxyisoleucine
(50 mg/kg/day) reduced fasting hyperglycemia, insulinemia, and improved glucose tolerance in
diabetic rats [107]. In addition, fenugreek, along with several other botanicals commonly used as
interventions for T2D, contains biguanide-related compounds [108]. The identification of guanidine
and related biguanide compounds in French lilac plant (Galega officinalis L.) led to the
development of metformin, the most widely used anti-diabetic compound through the world.
The clinical studies that have evaluated the efficacy of fenugreek in individuals with both type 1 and
T2D have recently been reviewed [17]. In one study, 17 of 21 patients with T2D showed a
reduction in 2-hour post-prandial glucose averaging 30 mg/dl following administration of 15 g of
ground fenugreek seed [109]. In a crossover, placebo-controlled trial with 60 individuals with type 2
diabetes, the treatment group received 12.5 mg defatted fenugreek at lunch and dinner with
isocaloric diets for 24 weeks [110]. Fasting blood glucose was 151 mg/dl at baseline, and reduced
to 112 mg/dl after 24 weeks (P < 0.05). Fenugreek also caused a significant decrease in the area
under the glucose curve by approximately 40%.
In a small study, the effects of fenugreek seeds on glycemic control and insulin resistance in mild-
to-moderate T2D was performed using a double-blind, placebo-controlled design [111]. Twenty-five
newly diagnosed patients with T2D (fasting glucose < 200 mg/dl) were randomly divided into two
groups. Group I (n = 12) received 1 g/day of fenugreek seeds and Group II (n = 13) received
standard care (dietary control, exercise) plus placebo capsules for two months. After two months,
fasting blood glucose and two-hour post-glucose load blood glucose were not significantly different.
However, following an oral glucose challenge, the area under the curve (AUC) for blood glucose
(2375 ± 574 vs 27597 ± 274) and insulin (2492 ± 2536 vs. 5631 ± 2428) was significantly lower (P
< 0.001), as was the HOMA-IR index (112.9 ± 67 vs 92.2 ± 57; P < 0.05) in the treatment group
compared to control. Serum triglycerides were decreased and HDL cholesterol increased
significantly (both P < 0.05) following fenugreek treatment. Significant reductions in total cholesterol
and triglycerides have also been reported in other studies following fenugreek treatment [17].
In an open label pilot study, fenugreek seeds were evaluated in combination with M. charantia and
jamun seeds (Syzigium cumini) for effects on glycemic control in patients with T2D [112]. The
patients were divided into two groups of 30 each. The patients of group I were given the raw
powdered mixture in the form of capsules; the patients of group II were given this mixture in the
form of salty biscuits. Daily supplementation of 1 g of this powered mixture for a 1.5-month period
and increased to 2 g for another 1.5 months significantly reduced the fasting as well as the
postprandial glucose level of the diabetic patients. A significant decrease in oral hypoglycemic drug
intake and decline in percentage of the subjects who were on hypoglycemic drugs were found after
the 3-month feeding trial. The authors concluded that 2 g of this powdered mixture of traditional
medicinal plants in either raw or cooked form can be successfully used for lowering blood glucose
in diabetics.
The doses of fenugreek used in clinical studies have ranged from 2.5 grams to 15 grams daily of
the crushed and defatted seeds. Crushing is important in order to release the viscous gel fiber,
which presumably contributes to the efficacy of fenugreek. Typical doses of seeds are in the range
of 1-3 grams mixed with food and taken at mealtime. The most common side effects are
gastrointestinal upset (diarrhea and flatulence), which often can be alleviated by dose-titration.
Since the fenugreek fiber might absorb other oral medications, fenugreek should be taken
independently (e.g. 1-2 h) of other medications. Due to its ability to lower blood glucose, individuals
should monitor their glucose levels carefully if used in combination with insulin or other glucose-
lowering agents. Fenugreek can exhibit anti-coagulant activity; it should not be used with other
anti-coagulating agents due to the increased risk for bleeding.
The potential genotoxicity of a fenugreek seed extract (THL), containing a minimum of 40% 4-
hydroxyisoleucine, was evaluated using the panel of assays recommended by US Food and Drug
Administration for food ingredients (i.e. reverse mutation assay; mouse lymphoma forward
mutation assay; mouse micronucleus assay). THL was determined not to be genotoxic under the
conditions of the tested genetic toxicity battery [113]. An updated review regarding the beneficial
effects of fenugreek on both glucose and lipid control has recently been published [114]. No long
term studies on outcome, and cost- effectiveness, have been presented.
Cinnamomum cassia (Cinnamon)
Anderson and colleagues have previously reported that an ammonium hydroxide extract of
cinnamon potentiated the effect of insulin on glucose oxidation in isolated rat adipocytes [115;116].
Close evaluation of these in vitro data reveals that the cinnamon extract actually possessed insulin
mimetic activity, since the stimulatory effects were independent of insulin concentration and no
added insulin was required to achieve maximal glucose oxidation [116]. A water-soluble
polyphenolic polymer from cinnamon has been isolated, and shown to have insulin-like activity as
well as antioxidant activity in vitro [113]. Additionally, enzyme inhibition studies done have shown
that the bioactive compound(s) isolated from cinnamon can stimulate autophosphorylation of a
truncated form of the insulin receptor and can inhibit PTP-1, the rat homolog of the tyrosine
phosphatase PTP-1B that inactivates the insulin receptor [117;118].
Three small studies have evaluated the use of cinnamon in T2D. The effects of cinnamon on blood
glucose, triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol levels was evaluated
in patients with T2D [119]. A total of 60 people with T2D (30 men and 30 women aged 52.2 ± 6.32
years) were divided randomly into six groups. Groups 1, 2, and 3 consumed 1, 3, or 6 g of
cinnamon daily, respectively, and groups 4, 5, and 6 were given placebo capsules corresponding to
the number of capsules consumed for the three levels of cinnamon. The cinnamon was consumed
for 40 days, followed by a 20-day washout period. After 40 days, all three doses of cinnamon
significantly reduced the mean fasting serum glucose (18-29%), triglyceride (23-30%), LDL
cholesterol (7-27%), and total cholesterol (12-26%) levels; no significant changes were noted in the
placebo groups. Changes in HDL cholesterol were not significant, and no significant adverse
events were reported. The results of this interesting study suggest that intake of 1, 3, or 6 g of
cinnamon per day reduces serum glucose, triglyceride, LDL cholesterol, and total cholesterol.
A more recent trial has evaluated an aqueous-purified cinnamon extract on long-term glycemic
control and lipids in patients with T2D with equivocal results [120]. A total of 79 patients on insulin
therapy but treated with oral anti-diabetics or diet were randomly assigned to take either cinnamon
extract or a placebo capsule three times a day for 4 months in a double-blind study. The amount of
aqueous cinnamon extract corresponded to 3 g of cinnamon powder per day. The mean absolute
and percentage differences between the pre- and post-intervention fasting plasma glucose level of
the cinnamon and placebo groups were significantly different. There was a significantly higher
reduction in the cinnamon group (10.3%) than in the placebo group (3.4%). No significant intra-
group or inter-group differences were observed regarding HbA1c, lipid profiles or differences
between the pre- and post-intervention levels of these parameters The decrease in plasma glucose
correlated significantly with the baseline concentrations, indicating that subjects with a higher initial
plasma glucose level exhibited a greater response more from cinnamon intake [100]. No adverse
effects were observed.
In a third study, a total of 25 postmenopausal patients with T2D (aged 62.9 ± 1.5 y, BMI 30.4 ± 0.9
kg/m2) participated in a 6-wk intervention, during which they were supplemented with either
cinnamon (1.5 g/d) or a placebo [121]. Before and after 2 and 6 wk of supplementation, arterialized
blood samples were obtained and oral glucose tolerance tests were performed. Blood lipid profiles
and multiple indices of whole-body insulin sensitivity were determined. There were no time x
treatment interactions for whole-body insulin sensitivity or oral glucose tolerance. The blood lipid
profile of fasting subjects did not change after cinnamon supplementation. These results showed
that cinnamon supplementation (1.5 g/d) did not improve whole-body insulin sensitivity or oral
glucose tolerance, and did not modulate blood lipid profile in postmenopausal patients with T2D.
Thus, the ability of cinnamon to improve long-term glycemic control has yet to be confirmed.
Recently, an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating cinnamon's effect
on glycemia and lipid levels has been published [122].In this meta-analysis, Embase and Cochrane
Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched through February 2012. Included
RCTs evaluated cinnamon compared with control in patients with type 2 diabetes and reported at
least one of the following: HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), or triglycerides. Weighted mean
differences (with 95% confidence intervals) for endpoints were calculated using random-effects
models. In a meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (n = 543 patients), cinnamon doses of 120 mg/d to 6 g/d for
4 to 18 weeks reduced levels of fasting plasma glucose (-24.59 mg/dL; 95% CI, -40.52 to -8.67
mg/dL), total cholesterol (-15.60 mg/dL; 95% CI, -29.76 to -1.44 mg/dL), LDL-C (-9.42 mg/dL; 95%
CI, -17.21 to -1.63 mg/dL), and triglycerides (-29.59 mg/dL; 95% CI, -48.27 to -10.91
mg/dL). Cinnamon also increased levels of HDL-C (1.66 mg/dL; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.24 mg/dL). No
significant effect on HbA1c levels (-0.16%; 95%, CI -0.39% to 0.02%) was seen. High degrees of
heterogeneity were present for all analyses except HDL-C (I(2) ranging from 66.5% to 94.72%).
The authors concluded that the consumption of cinnamon was associated with a statistically
significant decrease in levels of fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglyceride
levels, and resulted in increased HDL-C levels. However, no significant effect on HbA1c was found.
Mormordica charantia (Bitter melon)
Mormordica charantia is reported to be the most popular plant used worldwide to treat diabetes
[90;91]. It has many names depending on the geographic location of origin: in India, where it is
widely used for diabetes [19], M. charantia is known as karela, bitter melon, and bitter gourd. In
other parts of the world, it is also known as wild cucumber, ampalaya, and cundeamor [17]. The
glucose-lowering activity of M. charantia (administered as both fresh juice and unripe fruit) has
been well documented in animal models of diabetes [19;123]. Compounds possessing anti-diabetic
activity include charantin and vicine [36;91;124]. In addition, other bioactive components of bitter
melon extract appear to have structural similarities to animal insulin (e.g. polypeptide-p) [123;124].
Several modes of action have been proposed to account for the anti-diabetic activity of M.
charantia including inhibition of glucose absorption in the gut, stimulation of insulin secretion, and
the stimulation of hepatic glycogen synthesis [17;123]. Four clinical trials have reported bitter
melon juice, fruit, and dried powder to have a moderate hypoglycemic effect [17;36;125]. However,
these studies were small and were not randomized or double-blind, and of insufficient quality to
recommend the use of M. charantia . When used at typical doses, 300-600 mg of juice extract or 1-
2 g of powdered leaf daily, M. charantia is generally well tolerated, although it should not be used
by children or pregnant women [17;125].
A recent assessment of four randomized controlled trials with up to three months duration and
investigating 479 subjects concluded that there is insufficient evidence regarding the effects of M.
charantia for improving glycemic control compared to placebo for T2D [126].
Gymnema sylvestre (Gurmar)
Gymnema sylvestre (also called gurmar), a woody plant that grows wild in India, has a long history
of use in Ayurvedic medicine [19]. The leaves of G. sylvestre contain glycosides and the peptide
gurmarin [90;91]. Other plant constituents include resins, gymnemic acids, saponins, stigmasterol,
quercitol, and several amino acid derivatives. A water-soluble acidic fraction called GS4 has been
used in most clinical studies (see below). Several modes of action have been proposed to account
for the anti-diabetic activity of G. sylvestre including increased glucose uptake and utilization,
increased insulin secretion, and increased -cell number [36].
There have been several small clinical studies in individuals with type 1 and T2D (reviewed in [17]).
These studies have reported that G. sylvestre decreases fasting glucose and HbA1c, lowered
insulin requirements in individuals with type 1 diabetes, and lowered the dose of anti-
hyperglycemic medications in individuals with T2D. G. sylvestre also appears to facilitate
endogenous insulin secretion, but it is not a substitute for insulin. There are no data from double-
blind, placebo-controlled studies in humans that validate the efficacy of G. sylvestre in type 1 or
type 2 diabetes. The extract (~400 mg daily) of G. sylvestre is well tolerated, and no significant side
effects have been reported.
A recent review of the effects of the various extracts of G. sylvestre in the regulation of
carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in both animal and clinical studies has been published [127].
Nothing in this paper changes the original evaluation of this ingredient.
Opuntia (fuliginosa, streptacantha) (Prickly pear cactus; Nopal)
Nopal, a member of the Opuntia genus, is widely used in Mexico as a treatment for glucose control
[128]. It grows in arid regions throughout the Western hemisphere, and is known in the United
States as prickly pear cactus. This plant produces both a vegetable, called nopal, and a red egg-
shaped fruit called tuna. Nopal is a common component of every day foods including soups,
salads, sandwiches, and blended in drinks. When used for glucose control, nopal is prepared as a
food, and is available as in bulk, dried powder form or in capsules. The glucose-lowering activity of
nopal is likely due to its very high soluble fiber and pectin content [90;91;129], although its ability to
reduce fasting glucose is suggestive of additional modes of action [128].
The results of most human studies of this plant have been reported in Spanish-language journals
[36;128]; two studies evaluating the acute effects of nopal have been published in English by Frati
et al [130;131]. Both studies used Opuntia streptacantha Lemaire, and reported improved glycemic
control (decreased serum glucose) and improved insulin sensitivity (decreased serum insulin)
following a single-dose (500 g of broiled or grilled nopal stems) in patients with type 2 diabetes (n=
14 and n = 22). No effect was observed in healthy individuals [130], nor were any adverse effects
reported. The potential clinical efficacy of this plant warrants further study.
In 2010, a study designed to evaluate the acute and chronic effects of OpunDia (Opuntia ficus-
indica) in obese pre-diabetic men and women was published [132]. This double-blind placebo
controlled study included participants (age range of 20-50 years) randomly assigned to one of the
two groups and given a 16-week supply of either the 200 mg OpunDia (n=15), or placebo (n=14).
The acute phase of the study consisted of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) with a 400 mg
bolus of OpunDia given 30 min before orally ingesting a 75 g glucose drink. Baseline and post 16-
week concentrations of glucose, insulin, hsCRP, adiponectin, proinsulin, Hb1Ac, cholesterol, and a
comprehensive metabolic panel were collected along with body composition. There was a
statistically significant decrease in blood glucose concentrations at the 60 (205.92+/-36.90 and
188.84+/-38.43 mg/dL, respectively), 90 (184.55+/-33.67 and 169.74+/-35.16 mg/dL, respectively)
and 120 min (159.24+/-17.85 and 148.89+/-24.86 mg/dL, respectively) time points with the pre-
OGTT compared to the OpunDia bolus trial. There were no between-group differences found with
the OGTT time points, area under the curve, blood chemistry variables (insulin, hsCRP,
adiponectin, proinsulin, Hb1Ac), diet analysis variables (carbohydrates, fat, protein and total kcals),
body composition variables (fat mass, fat free mass, percent body fat and total body weight), or
blood chemistry safety parameters (comprehensive metabolic panel) pre-to-post 16-week
intervention. There are no long term studies on outcomes, or cost effectiveness.
Coccinia indica and Coccinia cordifolia
Coccinia indica is a creeper plant (one that spreads by means of stems that creep) that grows
wildly in Bangladesh and in many other parts of the Indian sub-continent. Although C. indica has a
long history of use as an antidiabetic treatment in Ayurvedic medicine [19], it has not been
subjected to the number of clinical trials that have evaluated M. charantia, fenugreek, or G.
sylvestre (based on published reports). Neither the bioactive compounds nor mode of action C.
indica have been well-characterized, but there is some suggestion that a component(s) of the plant
possesses insulin-mimetic activity [36].
A double blind, placebo-controlled trial in which a preparation from the leaves of the plant was
administered to patients with uncontrolled T2D for 6 weeks [133]. Of the 16 patients who received
the experimental preparations, 10 showed significant improvement in their glucose tolerance (P <
0.001), while none out of the 16 patients in the placebo group showed improvement. Several other
studies also offered supporting evidence of the beneficial effect of this treatment (reviewed in [36]).
No adverse effects were reported. The potential clinical efficacy of this plant warrants further study.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Coccinia cordifolia on blood glucose levels of
incident type 2 diabetic patients requiring only dietary or lifestyle modifications [134]. The study
was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Sixty incident type 2 diabetic subjects
(aged 35-60 years) were recruited from St. Johns Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India. The
subjects were randomly assigned into the placebo or experimental group and were provided with 1
g alcoholic extract of the herb for 90 days. Anthropometric, biochemical, dietary, and physical
activity assessment were carried out at baseline and were repeated at days 45 and 90 of the study.
All subjects were provided with standard dietary and physical activity advice for blood sugar
control. There was a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the fasting, postprandial blood glucose and
HbA1C (~0.6%) of the experimental group compared with that of the placebo group. The fasting
and postprandial blood glucose levels of the experimental group at day 90 significantly decreased
by 16 and 18%, respectively. There were no significant changes observed in the serum lipid levels.
This study suggests that C. cordifolia extract has a potential hypoglycemic action in patients with
mild diabetes. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results and to elucidate the
mode(s) of action of Coccinia.
Panax (ginseng, japoncicus, quinquefolius, eleutherococcus)
Ginseng, a member of the plant family Aaraliaceae, has been used in traditional Chinese medicine
for thousands of years [83;88;135]. The botanical names for Asian ginseng (Chinese or Korean) is
Panax ginseng; Japanese ginseng is known as Panax japonicus; American ginseng is Panax
quinquefolius. Siberian ginseng belongs to the genus Eleutherococcus. Many therapeutic claims
have been ascribed to the use of ginseng root extract including improved vitality and immune
function, along with beneficial effects on cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and sexual
function [136]. Bioactive compounds that have been identified in ginseng species include
ginsenosides, polysaccharides, peptides, and fatty acids [90;91]. Most pharmacological actions are
attributed to the ginsenosides, a family of steroids named saponins [90;91]. A comprehensive
review of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ginseng extracts (mostly Panax
ginseng and Panax quinquefolius ) has been performed, and it was concluded by the authors that
there was insufficient evidence to support efficacy for any of the above indications [136]. However,
in light of the extreme compositional variability of ginsenoside concentrations reported in a
sampling of 32 studies, it is possible that the anti-hyperglycemic efficacy might be as variable as its
ginsenoside content [137;138].
Two small studies have evaluated the use of ginseng in diabetes. In a double-blind, placebo
controlled study, 36 patients with T2D were treated for 8 weeks with ginseng extract (species not
specified) at 100 (n =12) or 200 (n = 12) mg/day, or with a placebo (n =12) [139]. Ginseng (100 and
200 mg/day) but not placebo lowered fasting blood glucose by approximately 0.5-1 mmol/l (P <
0.05). Eight subjects who were given ginseng and two who were given placebo achieved normal
fasting blood glucose. In response to an oral glucose challenge, the area under the 2-h blood
glucose curve was reduced approximately 16% (P < 0.001) in the eight ginseng-treated patients
who had normalized fasting blood glucose, without any concomitant change in immunoreactive
insulin or C-peptide. The 200 mg dose improved HbA1c (~0.5% decrease; P < 0.05) and physical
activity compared to placebo. Ginseng had no effect on plasma lipids. Another small study reported
the acute effects of Panax quinquefolius administration (single dose on four separate occasions; 3
g/treatment) or placebo on glucose tolerance in patients with T2D (n = 9) and in non-diabetic
subjects (n = 10) [140]. In both groups, ginseng caused a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in the
area under the blood glucose curve by approximately 20% compared to placebo. The potential
clinical efficacy of this plant warrants further study using a standardized extract.
In another study, the clinical efficacy of Korean red ginseng (Panax ginseng), as assessed by
HbA1c, was not demonstrated, although its safety was acceptable.[141]. A recent review has
evaluated the efficacy and safety of American ginseng on glycemic control in patients with.T2D
Aloe vera
The dried sap of the aloe plant (aloes) is a traditional botanical remedy frequently used to treat
dermatitis, burns and to enhance wound healing [143], and one of a variety of plants used for
diabetes in India [19] and the Arabian peninsula [144]. Its ability to lower the blood glucose was
studied in 5 patients with T2D [145]. Following the ingestion of aloe (one-half a teaspoonful daily
for 4-14 weeks), fasting serum glucose level decreased in every patient from a mean of 273 ± 25
(SE) to 151 ± 23 mg/dl (P < 0.05) with no change in body weight. This glucose-lowering activity has
been confirmed in two other studies which reported that oral administration of the aloes juice (1
tablespoon twice daily) reduced fasting glucose and triglycerides in subjects with type 2 diabetes
both in the absence and presence of concomitant sulfonylurea therapy [146;147]. No adverse
effects were reported in these studies. Aloe gel also holds the potential for glucose-lowering
activity, as it contains glucomannan, a water soluble fiber that reportedly has glucose-lowering and
insulin sensitizing activities [52;148]. The potential clinical efficacy of this plant warrants further
More recently, in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial with hyperlipidemic
(hypercholesterolemic and/or hypertriglyceridemic) patients with T2D aged 40 to 60 years not using
other anti-hyperlipidemic agents and resistant to daily intake of two 5 mg glyburide tablets and two
500 mg metformin tablets [149]. The efficacy and safety of taking aloe gel (one 300 mg capsule
every 12 hours for 2 months) combined with the aforementioned drugs in treatment of 30 patients
were evaluated and compared with the placebo group (n = 30). The aloe gel lowered fasting blood
glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, and LDL levels significantly without any significant effects on the
other blood lipid levels and liver/kidney function tests compared with the placebo at the endpoint.
No adverse effects were reported. There is insufficient data to reach a conclusion about this
Allium (sativum and cepa) (Garlic)
Allium sativum (garlic) has been used as a medicinal herb by the ancient Sumarians, Egyptians,
Greeks, Chinese, Indians, and later the Italians and English [150]. The leading Indian ancient
medical text, Charaka-Samhita recommended garlic for the treatment of heart disease and arthritis
for over many centuries [150]. Compounds present in aqueous garlic extract or raw garlic
homogenate though to be the principle bioactive components include allicin (allyl 2-
propenethiosulfonate or diallyl thiosulfonate), allyl methyl thiosulfonate, 1-propenyl allyl
thiosulfonate, and γ-L-glutamyl-S-alkyl-L-cysteine.
In modern times, garlic preparations have been widely recognized as agents for prevention and
treatment of cardiovascular and other metabolic diseases, atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia,
thrombosis, hypertension and diabetes [151-153]. Epidemiological evidence indicates an inverse
correlation between garlic consumption and the reduced risk of the development of cardiovascular
disease [154-156]. The efficacy of garlic in cardiovascular diseases has been more evident in non-
clinical models, thus prompting a variety of clinical trials [150]. Many of these trials have reported
beneficial effects of garlic on almost all cardiovascular conditions mentioned above [157]; however,
a number of studies have reported no beneficial effects, casting doubt on the reputed health
benefits of garlic. The glucose-lowering activity of garlic in humans with type 2 diabetes is not well
studied. In the studies that have evaluated garlic, the data have been conflicting [36;150]. Thus, the
role of garlic in glucose control has yet to be confirmed.
A recent study was conducted to assess the anti-hyperglycemic, lipid-lowering, anti-inflammatory,
and improving glycemic control of garlic in obese patients with T2D [158]. This was an open-label,
prospective, comparative study, conducted on 60 patients. The patients were divided into two
groups of 30 each, of either sex. Group 1 was given metformin tablets, 500 mg twice a day
(BD)/three times a day (TDS), after meals, and group 2 was given metformin tablets, 500 mg
BD/TDS, after meals, along with garlic (Allium sativum) capsules, 250 mg BD. Patients were
evaluated for fasting and postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c, serum adenosine deaminase levels
and lipid profile (serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and low-
density lipoprotein cholesterol) at the start of the study. Patients were followed up for 12 weeks,
with monitoring of fasting and postprandial blood glucose at 2 week intervals, and monitoring of the
other parameters at the end of study. Data obtained at the end of the study was statistically
analyzed using Student's t test. It was observed that both metformin alone and metformin
with garlic reduced fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose significantly, with a
greater percentage reduction with metformin plus garlic; however, the change in HbA1c was not
significant. A fall in total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein and an increase in
high-density lipoprotein were more pronounced in patients treated with metformin plus garlic.
Similarly, a fall in C-reactive protein and adenosine deaminase levels was greater in patients taking
metformin with garlic than in patients taking only metformin. These promising effects of garlic
extract need to be confirmed in future clinical studies.
Traditional Chinese Medicine
A discussion of botanical interventions for T2D would not be complete without the thoughtful
consideration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Over the centuries, Chinese herbal ‘drugs’ have
served as a primary source for the prevention and treatment of many diseases including diabetes.
Xiao-ke is a term used to refer to wasting and thirsting syndrome (T1D); the more modern term,
Tang-niao-bing, means ‘sugar urine illness’ (T2D)[159]. Unfortunately, a review of Traditional
Chinese Medicine in the context of T2D is beyond the scope of this chapter. However, a number of
excellent reviews on this subject are available, and will provide the reader with a more definitive
evaluation of this subject than what could be accomplished in this presentation [160-165]. A
systematic review of this topic concluded that the current state of the literature regarding the utility
of TCM for the treatment of T2D is inadequate [166].
Table 3. Major Botanicals Used for Type 2 Diabetes
Botanical Putative
Anti- Diabetic
Mode of
Potential Side
I. batas
weight acid
reduces HbA1c
Not well
4 g of
None reported
T. foenum-
Fiber, 4-
control; Anti-
Delays gastric
absorption in
gut; Enhances
2.5-15 g
Additive with
other glucose-
agents and
insulin; GI
irritation; Anti-
C. cassia
Methyl hydroxyl
chalcone polymer
3-6 g
None reported
M. charantia
Charantin, vicine,
polypeptide P
absorption in
gut; Enhances
transport and
mg (juice
1.8 g
Additive with
other glucose-
agents and
insulin; GI
G. sylvestre
Gymnemic acids,
absorption in
gut; Enhances
Additive with
other glucose-
agents and
insulin; GI
prickly pear)
Fiber, pectin Glucose
control; Anti-
Delays gastric
absorption in
2.4 g None reported
(limited data)
C. indica Not yet
1.8 g
None reported
(limited data)
peptides, fatty
Delays gastric
absorption in
gut; Hormonal
Interacts with
many drugs
A. vera
salicylic acids
delays gastric
emptying and
absorption in
1.2 g
None reported
(limited data)
A. sativum
Allicin, allyl methyl
thiosulfonate, 1-
propenyl allyl
thiosulfonate, -L-
glutamyl- S-alkyl-
L- cysteine
GI irritation;
garlic odor
Please see text for detailed comments on effectiveness, or lack thereof these non-botanical
Oxidative stress, resulting primarily from chronic hyperglycemia, is a major cause of the
complications of diabetes [167]. More recently, there is a growing appreciation of the role of
oxidative stress as a mediator of insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction [168-170]. In this context,
there are a growing number of studies in humans that have reported beneficial effects of
antioxidants on various measures of abnormalities of diabetes [38;39;171;172]. In addition, it is
often reported that individuals with diabetes are deficient in one or more essential micronutrients,
and that supplementation often provides a significant improvement. This section will provide a
concise overview of those antioxidants, vitamins, minerals, and other dietary supplements
(collectively referred to here as nutraceuticals) that have received the most attention as potential
adjunct treatments for diabetes. See Table 4 for a summary of this information.
-Lipoic Acid
Alpha-lipoic acid [(LA), occasionally referred to as thioctic acid], is a biologically active, eight-
carbon disulfide containing a single chiral center [173]. In vivo, LA is reduced to its dithiol form,
dihydrolipoic acid, a compound that also possesses biological activity. LA is synthesized de novo in
organisms ranging from bacteria to man. In humans, it is synthesized in liver and other tissues,
where it functions as a co-factor in multi-enzyme dehydrogenase complexes, such as pyruvate
dehydrogenase (PDH) and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase. Thus, LA plays an essential role in
mitochondrial-specific pathways that generate energy from glucose. More recently, LA has been
shown to regulate transcription via modulation of thiol/disulfide exchange reactions on several
transcription factors including NRF2, a major protein that binds to the anti-oxidant response
element [174]. Lipoic acid also has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism, via its ability to stimulate
AMP-activated protein kinase and sirtuin 1 [175]. When used as a nutritional supplement in
humans, LA is an effective anti-oxidant, increases intracellular glutathione, has anti-inflammatory
activity, and counteracts oxidative stress. Due its established record of safety and efficacy, LA has
become one of the most widely used nutritional supplements in the world.
In Western countries, LA has been used to reduce the symptoms of peripheral diabetic neuropathy.
LA has been prescribed in Germany for over thirty years for the treatment of diabetes-induced
neuropathy [176-178]. Results from several controlled clinical studies evaluating the effects of LA
on diabetic neuropathy indicate that this compound is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious when
administered intravenously [178-181]. Other work indicates that LA is also efficacious at improving
symptoms of diabetic neuropathy when administered orally [182].
A recently published meta-analysis of fifteen clinical studies reported that treatment with LA (300-
600 mg/d, iv, for 2-4 weeks) was safe and significantly improved both nerve conduction velocity
and the symptoms of diabetic peripheral neuropathy [183]. LA also increases insulin sensitivity and
improves glucose control in a variety of clinical contexts [184-186]. Controlled release lipoic acid
has been reported to increase insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and to
reduce plasma triglycerides [184].
Oral administration of LA (1800 mg/d) was associated with modest (~2%) but statistically significant
weight loss in patients with body mass index > 27 [187]; LA (1200 mg/d) was also associated with
weight loss in non-diabetic schizophrenia patients taking antihistaminic antipsychotics [188]. In
Japan, LA is prescribed for hearing impairment, Leigh syndrome, and sub-acute necrotizing
encephalopathy prior to its designation as a food supplement [189-191].
In addition to the beneficial effects of LA on diabetes-induced neuropathy, several clinical studies
have reported an improvement in insulin sensitivity and whole-body glucose metabolism in patients
with type 2 diabetes after continuous intravenous (iv) infusion of LA [173;192-194]. Investigators
have reported that a continuous infusion iv of LA substantially increases insulin-mediated glucose
disposal (~30-50%) [192;193]. Oral administration of LA (enteric-coated tablet) exerts a smaller
(~20%) but nonetheless significant effect on insulin sensitivity [195;196]. To overcome the
abbreviated half-life of LA in plasma, a controlled release formulation of LA (CRLA) has been
developed [197]. The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of CRLA were evaluated in healthy
individuals and in patients with type 2 diabetes, and this agent was found to be safe, well-tolerated,
and significantly reduced plasma fructosamine in patients with type 2 diabetes [197]. Also, non-
controlled release LA recently has been reported to increase insulin mediated glucose disposal in
patients with type 2 diabetes [198]. Controlled release lipoic acid has also been shown to increase
insulin sensitivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and to reduce plasma triglycerides
Although the exact mechanism of action of LA is unknown, in vitro data from the laboratories of
Rudich and others have indicated that LA pretreatment maintains the intracellular level of reduced
glutathione (the major intracellular antioxidant) in the presence of oxidative stress, and blocks the
activation of serine kinases that could potentially mediate insulin resistance [199-202]. Thus, one
potential explanation for the protective effects of LA might be related to its ability to preserve the
intracellular redox balance (acting either directly or through other endogenous antioxidants such as
glutathione), thereby blocking the activation of inhibitory stress-sensitive serine kinases including
IKKβ [168]. This stress-sensitive kinase is a crucial regulator of the transcription factor nuclear
factor-κB (NF-κB), a major target of hyperglycemia, cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and
oxidative stress [203-205]. The aberrant regulation of NF-κB is associated with a number of chronic
diseases including diabetes and atherosclerosis [203;205]. The ability of LA to block the activation
of NF-κB is well established in vitro and in vivo [201;206-209]. Recent evidence has linked the
activation of NF-κB with insulin resistance [169;210]. Activation of IKKβ inhibits insulin action.
Salicylates, which inhibit IKKβ activity and block NF-κB activation [211], restore insulin sensitivity
both in vitro and in vivo [212;213].Treatment of nine patients with type 2 diabetes for two weeks
with high-dose aspirin (7 g/day) resulted in a significant reduction in hepatic glucose production
and fasting hyperglycemia, and increased insulin sensitivity [214]. The potential for toxicity
associated with such a high dose of salicylate administered chronically precludes consideration of
this agent for therapy, but the results support the rationale that IKKβ inhibition could be a useful
pharmacological approach to increase insulin sensitivity. Furthermore, LA and other agents that
interfere with the persistent activation of the NF-κB pathway appear to be promising approaches to
increase insulin sensitivity, and perhaps even as treatments for complications of diabetes in which
NF-κB activation has been implicated [178;204]. Despite its long history of safety, in very rare
cases involving genetically susceptible individuals, lipoic acid intake can be associated with acute
hypoglycemia [215]. This condition is known as insulin autoimmune syndrome or Hirata Disease.
L-Arginine is classified as a ‘semi-essential’ amino acid utilized by all cells [216-218].
It plays a critical role in cytoplasmic and nuclear protein synthesis, biosynthesis of
other amino acids and derivatives, and in the urea cycle. In this essential biochemical
pathway, urea is synthesized from arginine to enable the body to remove excess
ammonia, which is toxic to cells. L-arginine is classified as a glucogenic amino acid
because it can be metabolized into α-ketoglutarate, and enter the citric acid cycle
(Kreb’s Cycle). In one of its most important roles, L-arginine serves as a direct
precursor for the biosynthesis of NO [219]. Although this reaction was originally
discovered to occur in endothelial cells, the generation of NO from L-arginine occurs
in a variety of other cell types including skeletal muscle [217;220;221]. NO is
produced endogenously from L-arginine in a complex reaction that is catalyzed by the
enzyme nitric oxide synthase (NOS). The other product that is formed in this reaction
is citrulline. NO serves as a second messenger to trigger blood vessel dilation and
increase blood flow. L-arginine is the only physiological substrate that the NOS
enzymes use as a nitrogen donor. Thus, under certain conditions, it may be rate
limiting for NO production.
It is well established that aging leads to the deterioration of the vasculature and increased risk for
cardiovascular disease [222-224]. Circulatory diseases account for considerable morbidity and
almost half of all deaths in people over the age of 75 years. A major abnormality of the vasculature
present in individuals with type 2 diabetes is endothelial dysfunction, or reduced blood flow
capacity. As discussed above, NO is a major regulator of the blood flow. Basal release of NO from
the vascular endothelium maintains a constant vasodilating tone. Impaired NO-mediated
vasodilatation has been described in hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and aging
In atherosclerosis, the endothelium has a reduced capacity to produce NO and target cells are
relatively insensitive to it [226]. The ability of NO to cause vasodilation provides an explanation for
the mechanism of action of nitroglycerin, which has been used for over 100 years to treat patients
with angina (pain due to inadequate blood flow to the heart) [227]. NO is produced following
administration of nitroglycerin and other NO donors, such as L-arginine [227;228]. In particular, L-
arginine is a substrate for NOS, which is responsible for the endothelial production of NO.
Therefore, many investigators have evaluated the usefulness of L-arginine supplementation in
animals and in humans in increasing NO production and improving cardiovascular health. The
results of these studies have been summarized in several recent books [218;229] and a review
[230]. Results of oral L-arginine supplementation in hypercholesterolemic animals have
consistently shown beneficial effects. L-arginine appears to inhibit the progression of
atherosclerotic plaques and preserve endothelial function [230]. In addition, L-arginine affects other
mediators of atherosclerosis, including circulating inflammatory cells and platelets [230].
On balance, the data in humans have also been positive, although more variable [231-242]. Five of
the 17 studies showed no cardiovascular health benefit from oral L-arginine supplementation [230].
The remaining 12 studies demonstrated beneficial effects as evidenced by decreased platelet
aggregation and adhesion, decreased monocyte adhesion, or improved endothelium-dependent
vasodilation [230]. Taken together, these studies provide some evidence for the idea that treatment
with an exogenous NO donor could have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular health.
Recently, a study assessed the efficacy of long-term L-arginine (L-arg) therapy in preventing or
delaying type 2 diabetes mellitus [243]. A mono-centre, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group,
placebo-controlled, phase III trial (L-arg trial) was conducted on 144 individuals with impaired
glucose tolerance (IGT) and metabolic syndrome (MS). L-Arg/placebo was administered (6.4
g/day) on a background structured lifestyle intervention for 18 months plus a 12-month extended
follow-up period after study intervention termination. Fasting glucose levels and glucose tolerance
after oral glucose tolerance test were evaluated throughout the study. After 18 months, L-arg as
compared with placebo did not reduce the cumulative incidence of diabetes [21.4 and 20.8%,
respectively, hazard ratio (HR), 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-1.86] while the cumulative
probability to become normal glucose tolerant (NGT) increased (42.4 and 22.1%, respectively, HR,
2.60; 95% CI, 1.51-4.46, p < 0.001). The higher cumulative probability to become of NGT was
maintained during the extended period in subjects previously treated with L-arg (HR, 3.21; 95% CI,
1.87-5.51; p < 0.001). At the end of the extended period, the cumulative incidence of diabetes in
subjects previously treated with L-arg was reduced as compared with placebo (27.2 and 47.1%,
respectively, HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.75, p < 0.05). During both periods, L-arg significantly
improved insulin sensitivity and β-cell function. These results support the consideration of L-
arginine intervention for those individuals with are classified as having the metabolic syndrome with
impaired glucose tolerance. More definitive studies are needed.
Vitamin C
Epidemiological evidence suggests that a high dietary intake of vitamin C, a marker of fruit and
vegetable intake, is associated with a reduced risk for the development of cardiovascular disease
[244;245]. Plasma vitamin C, fruit intake, and dietary vitamin C intake is significantly and inversely
associated with mean concentrations of C-reactive protein and tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA)
antigen, a marker of endothelial dysfunction, suggesting that vitamin C has anti-inflammatory
effects and is associated with lower endothelial dysfunction in men with no history of
cardiovascular disease or diabetes [246;247]. However, a high vitamin C intake from supplements
has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease mortality in
postmenopausal women with diabetes [60].
The normal functions of vascular endothelial tissue include regulation of vasomotor tone, inhibition
of platelet activity, and regulation of recruitment of inflammatory cells into the vasculature [248]. A
damaged endothelium (‘endothelial dysfunction’) is a key event in the development of diabetic
macroangiopathy, and is associated with the oxidative stress-mediated blunting of nitric oxide
action [226;249;250]. Endothelial dysfunction has been documented in individuals who are insulin
resistant and in those at risk for developing T2D [250-252].
The data as to whether vitamin C treatment (either acute or sub-chronic) exerts a beneficial effect
on endothelial dysfunction in individuals with T2D is conflicting. Acute treatment with vitamin C
improved endothelial function in obese subjects [253], in patients with type 1 and T2D, and in
women with gestational diabetes [254-256].
In patients with cardiovascular disease including endothelial dysfunction, both acute (single dose, 2
g) and chronic treatment with vitamin C (30 days, 500 mg/d) reverses the vasomotor defect, as
judged by increased flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery [257;258]. All of the above studies
involved relatively small populations (< 75) and used acute treatment except one, which was for 30
days [258]. Nonetheless, the persistent finding of a beneficial effect of antioxidant treatment on
endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation) in individuals with demonstrated endothelial
dysfunction is encouraging. It is likely that these results will stimulate additional clinical studies of
larger size and longer duration to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin C and perhaps other antioxidants.
In addition to playing a major role in the etiology of diabetic macroangiopathy, endothelial
dysfunction could promote insulin resistance [251]. It is possible that oxidative stress-mediated
blunting of nitric oxide action indirectly affects insulin sensitivity (e.g. reduced peripheral blood flow,
increased peroxynitrite formation, others) consequently reducing insulin-stimulated glucose
transport in skeletal muscle.
Cigarette smoking impairs endothelial function, and is one of the major risk factors for
hypertension, atherosclerosis, and coronary heart disease. The effects of vitamin C (infusion) on
insulin sensitivity and endothelial function (measured by flow-mediated dilation of brachial artery;
FMD) were evaluated in smokers, non-smokers with impaired glucose tolerance, and non-smokers
with normal glucose tolerance [259]. Both insulin sensitivity and FMD were blunted in smokers and
nonsmokers with IGT, compared with controls. In smokers and in non-smokers with impaired
glucose tolerance, vitamin C significantly improved FMD, increased insulin sensitivity, and
decreased plasma thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, an index of oxidative stress. In contrast,
vitamin C had no effect on these parameters in non-smokers with normal glucose tolerance. In
patients with coronary spastic angina and endothelial dysfunction, vitamin C infusion augmented
FMD and increased insulin sensitivity [260]. In contrast, vitamin C had no effect in healthy controls.
More recent studies have reported that vitamin C treatment significantly increased forearm
vasodilatory response to reactive hyperemia only in patients with combined T2D and
cardiovascular disease [261], and improved endothelial dysfunction and attenuated post-prandial
lipemia-induced oxidative stress in subjects with T2D [262].
To test the hypothesis that the vitamin C influences microcirculatory function in patients with T2D,
subjects were treated with 1 g of vitamin C three times a day for 2 weeks in a randomized placebo-
controlled double-blind cross-over design. Microvascular reactivity was assessed by vital
capillaroscopy and post-occlusive reactive hyperemia. High-sensitivity(hs)-CRP (C-reactive
protein), IL-6 (interleukin-6), IL-1ra (interleukin-1 receptor antagonist), and ox-LDL (oxidized low-
density lipoprotein) were analyzed. The results showed no significant change in microvascular
reactivity assessed after 2 weeks of vitamin C treatment. IL-1ra, IL-6, hs-CRP and ox-LDL did not
change significantly, neither as absolute or relative values. In conclusion, in contrast with some
studies reported previously, this study did not demonstrate an effect of continuous oral treatment
with vitamin C on microvascular reactivity assessed at the level of individual capillaries, nor any
indication of an effect on inflammatory cytokines or ox-LDL.
Using an excellent study design, the effects of high-dose oral vitamin C to alter endothelial
dysfunction and insulin resistance in T2D was investigated [263]. Thirty-two diabetic subjects with
low plasma vitamin C were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of
vitamin C (800 mg/day for 4 wk). No significant changes in fasting glucose, insulin, SI (determined
by glucose clamp), or forearm blood flow in response to ACh, SNP, or insulin were observed after
vitamin C treatment. These results indicate that that high-dose oral vitamin C therapy, resulting in
incomplete replenishment of vitamin C levels, is ineffective at improving endothelial dysfunction
and insulin resistance in T2D.
Recent work regarding the benefit of vitamin C for T2D (or prevention of cardiovascular
complications) remains conflicted. A major study reported no benefit of intervention with either
vitamin C (ascorbate, 500 mg every day), vitamin E RRR-alpha-tocopherol acetate, 600 IU every
other day), or beta-carotene (50 mg every other day) on the risk of developing T2D in women at
high risk for cardiovascular disease [264]. In contrast, epidemiological evidence suggests that
higher plasma vitamin C and, to a lesser degree fruit and vegetable intake, was associated with a
substantially decreased risk of diabetes [265]. Clearly, it is advisable, in most cases, to continue to
pursue reduced calorie diets with a high intake of fiber, fruits, and vegetables to reduce the risk for
developing type 2 diabetes and its complications.,
Coenzyme Q10
Another antioxidant reported to have beneficial effects for diabetes is coenzyme Q10. Coenzyme Q
is a vitamin-like molecule that has is frequently used in the treatment of several disorders primarily
related to suboptimal cellular energy metabolism and oxidative stress [266]. The effects of orally
administered coenzyme Q10 were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 30
patients with coronary heart disease [267]. Following 8 weeks of treatment with coenzyme Q10 (60
mg twice daily), patients exhibited reduced plasma levels of glucose, insulin, (fasting and 2 hour),
and lipid peroxides (a marker of oxidative stress) compared to controls. These results indicate that
coenzyme Q10 decreased oxidative stress and improved insulin sensitivity. Additional evaluation of
coenzyme Q10 is clearly warrented.
To improve their lipid profiles, many patients with T2D are taking one of the HMG-CoA reductase
inhibitors (i.e. statin class of drugs). Statins can reduce serum levels of coenzyme Q10 by up to
40% [268;269]. The logical option is supplementation with coenzyme Q10 as a routine adjunct to
any treatment that may reduce the endogenous production of coenzyme Q10, based on a balance
of likely benefit against very small risk. This has not been evaluated.
In a recently published study, the effects of coenzyme Q10 versus placebo on glycemic control and
lipid profile in patients with T2D was evaluated. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial, 64 type patients with T2D were randomly assigned to receive either 200 mg
coenzyme Q10 or placebo daily for 12 weeks. Fasting blood samples were obtained and fasting
plasma glucose (FPG), HbA1c, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), LDL-C and HDL-C were
measured. At baseline, no significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes duration,
FPG, HbA1c, TC, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C existed between two groups. Serum HbA1c
concentration decreased in the coenzyme Q10-treated group (8% ± 2.28 vs. 8.61 ± 2.47%) with no
significant effect in the placebo group. In addition, mean differences of TC and LDL-C level were
reduced between two groups (P value=0.027 and 0.039, respectively). Following intervention, no
differences were observed regarding FPG, TG and HDL-C in the coenzyme Q10-treated group.
Since this is the first report of the beneficial effects of coenzyme Q10 glycemic or lipid control, this
study requires confirmation .
Vitamin E
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world, and
the major macrovascular complication of diabetes [270]. It is associated with increased oxidative
stress [271], and studies both in vitro and in vivo have provided the rationale for numerous
prospective clinical studies evaluating the effects of vitamin E (α-tocopherol) on diabetes and
cardiovascular events in different populations [272;273](see below). A review of these data by Jialal
and colleagues has led to the overall conclusion that four of the five major prospective trials (data
reported through 2001) have reported a beneficial effect on cardiovascular end-points, including
cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral vascular disease,
and others [273]. The one major study (HOPE Study [274]) that was negative for all end-points,
had three limitations [273]. It was terminated early due to the overwhelming positive effects of the
angiotensin-converting enzyme ramipril, it lacked data on the dietary intake of other antioxidants,
and only evaluated synthetic vitamin E (a mixture of tocopherols and tocotrienols) and not α-
tocopherol, the most potent and effective tocopherol.
In a study in patients with T2D evaluating the effects of vitamin E on biochemical risk factors for the
development of cardiovascular disease, vitamin E treatment significantly reduced low-density
lipoprotein oxidizability and soluble cell adhesion molecules [275]. Taken together, the evidence
suggests a beneficial effect of vitamin E in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, and in
those who are at a greater risk for its development.
Oral vitamin E treatment appears to be effective in normalizing abnormalities in retinal
hemodynamic, and improving renal function in patients with type 1 diabetes of short (disease)
duration [276]. Vitamin E was beneficial in those individuals with poorest glycemic control and the
most impaired retinal blood flow [276]. In a well-controlled study, short-term (4 weeks)
supplementation of patients with T2D with persistent micro/macroalbuminuria with both vitamins E
and C significantly lowered their urinary albumin excretion rate [277]. Four months treatment of
patients with T2D with autonomic neuropathy with vitamin E improved the ratio of cardiac
sympathetic to parasympathetic tone coincident with lowering of several indices of oxidative stress
[278]. Interestingly, the study also reported a lowering of glycated hemoglobin, insulin,
norepinephrine, and the homeoststatic model assessment index, indicative of increased insulin
sensitivity and glycemic control. These data suggest that vitamin E and perhaps other antioxidant
supplementation may provide a benefit in the treatment of microvascular complications of diabetes
including diabetic retinopathy or nephropathy.
Initial reports of a positive effect of vitamin E on insulin action in insulin resistant patients with T2D
were published almost ten years ago [279;280]. Twenty-five patients with T2D were treated with
vitamin E (d-α-tocopherol; 900 mg/day) or placebo for three months in a double-blind, crossover
design [281]. There was a trend in the reduction of plasma glucose, along with significant
reductions in HbA1c levels (7.8 vs. 7.1), triglycerides, free fatty acids, total cholesterol, low-density
lipoprotein cholesterol, and apoprotein B [280]. The β-cell response to glucose was unaffected.
These intriguing results prompted additional evaluations by Paolisso and colleagues using a more
sensitive technique to measure insulin sensitivity, the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp.
Ten healthy subjects and 15 patients with T2D underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and
euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp before and after vitamin E supplementation (900 mg/d for 4
mo) [282]. In patients with T2D, vitamin E supplementation significantly increased both whole-body
glucose disposal (i.e. insulin sensitivity) by approximately 50% and non-oxidative glucose disposal
by approximately 60%. Vitamin E also improved insulin action in the healthy subjects.
Vitamin E also improved insulin action in elderly people [283]. Twenty elderly, non-obese subjects
with normal glucose tolerance were submitted to euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp in a double-
blind, crossover, and randomized study after 4 months treatment with either vitamin E (900 mg/d)
or placebo. Whole-body glucose disposal was significantly potentiated by vitamin E compared to
placebo. Furthermore, plasma vitamin E concentrations were correlated with net changes in
insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal.
In a 4-week, double-blind, randomized study of vitamin E administration (600 mg/d) versus placebo
in 24 hypertensive patients, whole-body glucose disposal was measured by the euglycemic-
hyperinsulinemic clamp [284]. In hypertensive subjects, vitamin E administration significantly
increased whole-body glucose disposal, along with the ratio of reduced glutathione/oxidized
glutathione in plasma. Four months treatment of patients with T2D with cardiac autonomic
neuropathy with vitamin E lowered of glycated hemoglobin, insulin, norepinephrine, and the
homeoststatic model assessment index, indicative of increased insulin sensitivity and improved
glycemic control [278].
The results from a large number of major intervention studies have all concluded that treatment
with vitamin E is ineffective at improving glycemic control or endothelial function, altering the
development of T2D, or at preventing cardiovascular disease [57;61-63;285-288]; some studies
have even raised questions of its safety [62;287]. In light of these results, the use of supplemental
vitamin E (mixture or an individual isomer) for diabetes or cardiovascular health is no longer
This conclusion is supported, to a certain extent, by a recent meta-analysis that included 50
randomized controlled clinical trials with approximately 295,000 participants, which concluded that
the efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements [289] were ineffective for the prevention of
cardiovascular disease. However, recent clinical data pertaining to Vitamin E are not universally
negative. For example, Montero et al performed a systematic review on endothelial function in
individuals with T2D [290]. They searched for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of
antioxidant vitamin E and/or C supplementation on endothelial function in T2DM subjects. They
included ten randomized controlled trials comparing antioxidant vitamin-supplemented and control
groups (overall n = 296). Post-intervention standardized mean difference (SMD) in endothelial
function did not reach statistical significance between groups (0.35; 95% confidence interval =
-0.17, 0.88; P = 0.18). In subgroup analysis, post-intervention endothelial function was significantly
improved by antioxidant vitamin supplementation in T2DM subgroups with body mass index (BMI)
</= 29.45 kg m-2 (SMD = 1.02; P < 0.05), but not in T2DM subgroups with BMI > 29.45 kg m-2
(SMD = -0.07; P = 0.70). In meta-regression, an inverse association was found between BMI and
post-intervention SMD in endothelial function (B = -0.024, P = 0.02). Prolonged antioxidant vitamin
E and/or C supplementation could be effective to improve endothelial function in non-obese T2DM
subjects. Obviously, it cannot be concluded if the benefit on endothelia function could be attributed
to vitamin E alone, or due to a combination of vitamins E and C.
As we move into the era of more customized patient treatment protocols (personalized medicine), it
is important to realize that some patients are more likely to benefit from a particular intervention
than others. For example, Suksomboon et al reported that vitamin E supplementation had not
effect at improving glycemic control in unselected patients with T2D, but that it deceased HbA1c
(~0.6%) in patients with low serum levels of vitamin E (below the typical normal range) [291].
Another example of the possible importance of patient selection in the context of vitamin E
intervention is provided by Vardi et al, who have reported that patients with type 2 diabetes
possessing the haptoglobin type 2-2 have a higher risk (odds ratio = 2.03) for cardiovascular
events, compared to patients with other haptoglobin types. This risk was reduced in patients
treated with vitamin E (odds ratio = 0.66) [292;293].
Niacin (nicotinic acid) has been used for many years to reduce elevated cholesterol and
triglycerides. In addition, niacin has been shown to decrease cardiovascular events and mortality
[294]. Some degree of angiographic regression has also being shown with niacin when used with
other cholesterol medications. However, the use of niacin for the treatment of dyslipidemia-
associated T2D has been limited, due to the adverse effect of high doses on glycemic control.
Niacin is a B-vitamin (B-3), but when used in the doses necessary for blood cholesterol control, it
should be considered a drug and not a vitamin. Recently, it has been reported that niacin has the
potential ability, when given in low doses, to be well tolerated and efficacious. In this study,
treatment of individuals with dyslipidemia-associated T2D with extended-release niacin
(Niaspan™) led to significantly improved lipid levels and minimal changes in glycemic control [295].
The extended-release form was designed to circumvent the bothersome side effects of regular
niacin, such as flushing of the skin.
In this 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 148 patients were randomized to placebo (n
= 49) or 1000 (n = 45) or 1500 milligrams per day (n = 52) of Niaspan™. About half of the study
participants continued taking their prescribed statin drugs for cholesterol lowering during the trial,
and 81 percent continued their medications for diabetes. Dose-dependent increases in high-
density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (+19% to +24%; P < 0.05) vs. placebo for both niacin
dosages) and reductions in triglyceride levels (-13% to -28%; P < 0.05) vs. placebo for the 1500-
mg Niaspan™) were observed. Baseline and week 16 values for glycosylated hemoglobin levels
were 7.13% and 7.11%, respectively, in the placebo group; 7.28% and 7.35%, respectively, in the
1000-mg Niaspan™ group (P < 0.16 vs. placebo); and 7.2% and 7.5%, respectively, in the 1500-
mg Niaspan™ group (P < 0.048 vs placebo). Four patients discontinued participation because of
inadequate glucose control. Rates of adverse event rates other than flushing were similar for the
niacin and placebo groups. Four patients discontinued participation owing to flushing (including 1
receiving placebo). No hepatotoxic effects or myopathy were observed. The authors concluded that
low doses of Niaspan™ (1000 or 1500 mg/d) are a treatment option for dyslipidemia in patients
with T2D.
Patients with diabetic dyslipidemia are commonly treated with triglyceride-lowering fibrate drugs,
but niacin appears more effective than the fibrates for raising HDL. Since most patients with
diabetes will require lipid-lowering therapy, the use of statins to lower LDL cholesterol has become
routine therapy for the majority of patients. This study suggests that the addition of extended
release low-dose niacin to statin therapy could provide an additional benefit for improvement of
blood lipids and lipoproteins in patients with diabetes. However, the impact of niacin on glycemic
control in patients with T2D will still require regular monitoring.
In 2011, the Aim-High Trial was published with great fanfare and reported that among patients with
atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and LDL cholesterol levels of less than 70 mg per deciliter
(1.81 mmol per liter), there was no incremental clinical benefit from the addition of niacin to statin
therapy during a 36-month follow-up period, despite significant improvements in HDL cholesterol
and triglyceride levels [296]. It was thought to place a dagger in the heart of those advocating
niacin therapy. However, niacin exerts many other effects that are viewed as being beneficial
and/or protective in the context of cardiovascular disease. These include its ability to reduce
lipoprotein(a), C-reactive protein, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase, plasminogen activator
inhibitor 1 and fibrinogen [297]. Interestingly, aside from aerobic exercise, niacin is also the most
effective intervention at raising the level of circulating adiponectin [298], Adiponectin is one of the
adipocyte-derived hormones (adipokines), and well known for its effect in improving insulin
sensitivity in liver and skeletal muscle [299]. Unlike most other adipocyte-derived hormones,
adiponectin gene expression and blood concentration are inversely associated with adiposity.
Despite the discouraging results from the Aim-High Trial, niacin therapy should not be uniformly
discarded. A recent meta-analysis evaluating the effects of niacin on cardiovascular events
identified eleven trials including 9,959 subjects [300]. The authors reported that niacin use was
associated with a significant reduction in the composite endpoints of any CVD event (OR: 0.66;
95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.89; p = 0.007) and major coronary heart disease event (OR:
0.75; 95% CI: 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). No significant association was observed between niacin
therapy and stroke incidence (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.5 to 1.54; p = 0.65). The magnitude of on-
treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol difference between treatment arms was not
significantly associated with the magnitude of the effect of niacin on outcomes. The authors
concluded that the consensus perspective derived from available clinical data supports that niacin
reduces CVD events and, further, that this may occur through a mechanism not reflected by
changes in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration. Results from a single study should
not be used to base one’s entire judgment regarding any aspect of an intervention. In contrast, the
totality of the evidence should be considered. In the case of niacin, we agree that it should remain
on the list and be considered as a safe and effective intervention, under appropriate conditions
[301], but its value has not been verified by long term studies.
It has long been known that the French consume a much greater amount of saturated fats in their
diet, yet suffer from a lower incidence of cardiovascular disease. This phenomenon has been
termed ‘The French Paradox’. It has been proposed that the greater amount of red wine consumed
by the French protects them against the development of cardiovascular disease [302-304]. The
intensive search for the actual molecule(s) that could be responsible for this almost miraculous
activity led researchers to a compound identified as resveratrol. Resveratrol is a polyphenolic
compound (a stillbenol) found in plants, especially red grapes and peanuts [305]. Red wine,
produced from red grapes, contains the highest amount, on a percentage basis, of resveratrol
ranging from 0.1 – 14.3 mg per liter. The more resveratrol is investigated, the more its diverse
health benefits emerge. In animals, resveratrol has been associated with anti-cancer activity,
cardioprotective activity, antioxidant and glutathione-sparing activities, anti-inflammatory activity,
anti-viral activity, and anti-neurodegenerative activity [305-307]. But without a doubt, the activities
that affords resveratrol the most notoriety, is its ability to increase lifespan and delay age-related
deterioration in a variety of experimental models [308;309]. In experiments using yeast, nematodes
(roundworms), fruit flies, and fish, resveratrol has been shown to increase mean lifespan by 18-
70%, and maximum lifespan by 15-66%. While resveratrol has not yet been shown to increase
lifespan in mammals, it has been consistently shown in mice to delay age-related diseases,
improve metabolic efficiency, including a reduction in body weight and blood glucose, and largely
mimic the biochemical and physiologic effects of caloric restriction, qualifying it, to a degree, as a
caloric restriction mimetic [310;311].
What does resveratrol do at the mechanistic level that has led to its being the most widely
recognized polyphenolic? The striking similarities of the benefits of caloric restriction and
resveratrol led researchers to evaluate the effects of resveratrol on SIRT1 activation. These
experiments have conclusively shown that resveratrol does, indeed, activate SIRT1 and its
signaling partner, PGC-1 [312-314]. While there might be (and are) other important molecular
targets of resveratrol including AMPK [315], none are more important than SIRT1 and PGC-1 . In
light of the critical roles played by SIRT1 and PGC-1 in mitochondrial biogenesis, the obvious
question is what does resveratrol do, in this regard? Treatment of mice with resveratrol significantly
increased their aerobic capacity, judged by their increased running time and oxygen consumption
in their muscles [312]. Resveratrol induced the genes for oxidative phosphorylation and
mitochondrial biogenesis, effects largely explained by the resveratrol-mediated decrease in PGC-
1 acetylation and an increase in PGC-1 activity. This mechanism is consistent with resveratrol
being a known activator of SIRT1, and by the lack of effect of resveratrol in cells lacking SIRT1.
Importantly, resveratrol treatment protected mice against diet-induced-obesity and insulin
resistance [313;316;317]. If there was any doubt, these results obtained with resveratrol clearly
implicate SIRT1 and PGC-1 as key regulators of energy and metabolic homeostasis.
Since 2009, there has been an ever growing number of clinical assessments of various
preparations of resveratrol in a variety of clinical contexts, including obesity [318-322], impaired
glucose tolerance [323], T2D [324;325], cardiovascular disease [319;326-329], primary
cardiovascular disease prevention [330-333], mild hypertension [321], metabolic syndrome [334],
and cancer [335]. When used in the context of the metabolic and cardiovascular diseases, all
studies except one [319] have reported beneficial effects of resveratrol on one or more clinically
meaningful outcome measures.
Table 4. Major Non-Botanical Dietary Supplements Used for Type 2 Diabetes
Botanical Anti-Diabetic
Mode of
Daily Dose
Side Effects
PPARα,γ, ō
0.65-1.2 g
(EPA +
DHA); 2.4
GI irritation;
sensitizer; Anti-
GI irritation
Chromium Glucose
insulin action
Potential for
renal toxicity
Magnesium Insulin
control; Anti-
insulin action
mg; (2.5 g
used for
Resveratrol Insulin
Sirt 1
activator; Anti-
diarrhea, and
Zinc Glucose Anti- 30-80 mg GI irritation;
control inflammatory
metallic taste;
L-Arginine Improves
Nitric oxide
3-6 g None
Vitamin C Insulin
GI irritation
Vitamin E Insulin
Vanadium Insulin
mimetic; Pan-
GI irritation;
safety profile
for long term
human use
CLA Anti-obesity PPAR
2-4 g GI irritation;
and oxidative
Niacin Anti-
rate of hepatic
synthesis of
VLDL and
Available as
Second only to calcium, chromium is very popular mineral supplement in the US, with over 10
million individual users; in 2005, retail sales of chromium picolinate-containing products totaled
over $130 million, and represent approximately 20% of the total market for chromium-containing
products. Several authors, mostly on the basis of small studies of short duration, have suggested
dietary trivalent chromium supplementation as an attractive option for the management of T2D and
for glycemic control in persons at high risk for T2D [267;336]. Thus, chromium has emerged as the
most widely used dietary supplement for the treatment of T2D in the US. The link between
chromium and carbohydrate metabolism was proposed over 40 years ago, when it was identified
as a component of the biologically active ‘glucose tolerance factor’ [337]. Chromium deficiency has
been associated with decreased insulin action in both diabetic animals and humans [338-340].
Some but not all human studies have found that chromium supplementation has beneficial effects
in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes [341-345]. Oral administration of
trivalent chromium is associated with favorable safety profile in animals and in humans [346;347].
To critically evaluate the clinical studies with chromium-treatment reported to date, a systematic
review and meta-analysis of the RCTs were performed [348]. The objective was to determine the
effect of chromium on glucose and insulin responses in healthy subjects and in individuals with
glucose intolerance or T2D. The authors identified 20 reports of RCTs assessing the effects of
chromium on glucose, insulin, or HbA1c. Their analyses summarized data on 618 participants from
the 15 trials that reported adequate data: 193 participants had T2D and 425 were in good health or
had impaired glucose tolerance. The meta-analysis showed no association between chromium and
glucose or insulin concentrations among non-diabetic subjects. A study of 155 diabetic subjects in
China reported that chromium reduced glucose and insulin concentrations [349]; the combined
data from the 38 diabetic subjects in the other studies did not. Three trials reported data on HbA1c:
one study each of persons with T2D [349], persons with impaired glucose tolerance [350], and
healthy subjects [351]. The study of diabetic subjects in China was the only one to report that
chromium significantly reduced HbA1c [349]. Thus, this meta-analysis of RCTs showed no effect of
chromium on glucose or insulin concentrations in non-diabetic subjects, and data for persons with
diabetes are inconclusive.
More recent reports suggest that the ability of chromium to improve glycemic control and/or
increase insulin sensitivity is better observed in subjects with glucose intolerance, insulin
resistance, type 1 diabetes, T2D, or gestational diabetes, rather than in healthy normal subjects
[352]. Furthermore, these studies suggest that the form of chromium influences the study results,
and that the picolinate form provides greater efficacy [353]. Absorption and bioavailability studies of
the various forms of commercially available chromium have shown that chromium picolinate is
more readily absorbed and is more bioavailable than the other forms of chromium that have been
clinically tested in subjects with diabetes [354;355]. This may account for some of the disparity
seen in the glycemic response observed in the clinical studies conducted to date.
In contrast to the results reported by others [345;352], a recent study has found that chromium
picolinate (500 and 1000 μg daily for 6 months) was ineffective at reducing HbA1c in obese, poorly-
controlled, insulin-dependent individuals with T2D [342]. Possibilities to explain this contrasting
result are the limited statistical power to detect a significant change due to the small number of
subjects (n = 17 for placebo group; n = 14 for 500 μg group; n = 15 for 1000 μg group), greater
degree of obesity (and insulin resistance) at baseline (BMI = 33-35 kg/m2), and the severity of
diabetes control at baseline (HbA1c = 9.4-9.7%). Furthermore, these subjects were unable to
achieve adequate glycemic control even with anti-hyperglycemic medication, and required a very
high dose of insulin.
Although the exact mechanism of chromium action has not been definitively established, data from
a recent in vivo study suggest that chromium might exhibit its insulin sensitizing effect by reducing
the content and activity of the tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1B [356]. PTP-1B has long been
implicated in the regulation of insulin receptor tyrosine phosphorylation and tyrosine kinase activity
[357], and has been validated as a bona fide pharmacological target for increasing insulin
sensitivity [117;358-361]. In animals, small molecules that inhibit PTP-1B increase insulin
sensitivity and lower plasma glucose [362-364]. Alternatively, chromium might act directly on the
insulin receptor, and increase its tyrosine kinase activity [365], as has been observed with other
small molecules [366;367].
Additional RCTs in well-characterized, at-risk populations are necessary to determine whether
chromium has any significant long term effects on glucose, insulin, and HbA1c. To this end, the
Office of Dietary Supplements (ODS), the National Center for Complementary and Alternative
Medicine (NCCAM), and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
(NIDDK) invited basic and clinical applications to study the role of chromium as adjuvant therapy in
T2D and/or impaired glucose tolerance (;
program announcement expired 10/1/2004).
Magnesium, the fourth most abundant cation in humans, is an essential mineral in human nutrition,
and is required for wide array of biological functions [368;369]. It is a cofactor in over 300
enzymatic reactions, and is important for the electrical stability of cells, maintenance of membrane
integrity, muscle contraction, nerve conduction and vascular tone. Magnesium deficiency is linked
to a number of clinical disorders including insulin resistance, T2D, hypertension, and
cardiovascular disease [368;370-376]. Epidemiological studies strongly indicate that high daily
magnesium intake is predictive of a lower risk for T2D in both men and women [375;377-379]. The
plasma magnesium level is inversely related to insulin sensitivity in adults [380-382] and obese
children [383], and parenteral magnesium supplementation improves insulin sensitivity as well as
insulin secretion in patients with T2D [384-386]. However, until recently (see below), no beneficial
effect of oral magnesium supplementation has been demonstrated on glycemic control either in
patients with type 1 or T2D. Nonetheless, RCTs in well-characterized, at-risk populations are
warranted to see whether magnesium replacement therapy will prove efficacious in the treatment
of T2D.
To this end, it has recently been reported that oral magnesium supplementation (as a solution of
magnesium chloride, MgCl2) restores serum magnesium levels, and improves insulin sensitivity
and metabolic control in patients with T2D [387]. This study was a randomized double-blind
placebo-controlled design, in which 63 subjects with decreased serum magnesium (≤ 0.74 mmol/l)
treated by glibenclamide received either 50 ml of MgCl2 solution (50 g/l) or placebo daily for 16
weeks. At the end of the study, MgCl2–treated subjects showed a significantly higher serum
magnesium concentration (0.74 ± 0.10 vs. 0.65 ± 0.07 mmol/l, P < 0.02) and lower HOMA-IR index
(3.8 ± 1.1 vs. 5.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.005), fasting glucose levels (8.0 ± 2.4 vs. 10.3 ± 2.1 mmol/l, P <
0.01), and HbA1c (8.0 ± 2.4 vs. 10.1 ± 3.3%, P < 0.04) compared to placebo-treated subjects.
Subsequently, in a smaller pilot study (n = 9), the effects of magnesium (Mg) supplementation on
patients with T2D with stable glycemic control were investigated [388]. Water from a salt lake with a
high natural Mg content (7.1%) (MAG21) was used for supplementation after dilution with distilled
water to 100mg/100mL; 300mL/day was given for 30 days. Fasting serum immunoreactive insulin
level decreased significantly, as did HOMA-IR (both P < 0.05). There was also a marked decrease
of the mean triglyceride level after supplementation. The patients with hypertension showed
significant reduction of systolic (P < 0.01), diastolic (P = 0.0038), and mean (P < 0.01) blood
pressure. Taken together, these results support the use of oral magnesium supplementation only in
patients with T2D who are magnesium-depleted.
Zinc is another essential mineral in human nutrition with a wide range of biological functions. Zinc
fulfills catalytic, structural, or regulatory roles in more than 200 zinc-requiring metalloenzymes
[369]. The interaction of zinc with insulin induces conformational changes and enhances binding to
the insulin receptor [389;390]. Zinc ions possess insulin mimetic activity, perhaps through their
ability to inhibit protein tyrosine phosphatases, including PTP-1B [391]. With regard to glucose
metabolism, zinc is a co-factor of several key enzymes. Zinc is an activator of fructose-1-6-
bisphosphate aldolase, and an inhibitor of fructose-1-6-biphosphatase [392]. Zinc can also exert
antioxidant activity [393], and is a cofactor in copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, a major
antioxidant enzyme [394].
Some studies have reported zinc deficiency along with alterations in zinc metabolism in patients
with diabetes [392;393;395]. Zinc supplementation studies in patients with diabetes are few, and
have yielded contradictory results with regard to effects on glycemic control [392;395]. Interestingly,
a recent study has confirmed previous reports that diabetic patients (both Type 1 and T2D) have
significantly lower mean serum zinc levels compared with healthy controls [395], and that zinc
supplementation (30 mg/day for 12 weeks) in the patients with T2D elevated their serum zinc level
and significantly decreased HbA1c. In a 12-week randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study
(n =18 per group) designed to evaluate the effects vitamin/mineral combination therapy on indices
of nephropathy in patients with T2D, zinc (30 mg /day), when used in combination with magnesium
(200 mg/day), vitamin C (200 mg), and vitamin E (100 IU/day) decreased the level of urinary
albumin excretion (P = 0.005, respectively), without affecting urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-
glucosaminidase activity [396]. The combination also resulted in a significant decrease in fasting
serum glucose (P = 0.035) and malondialdehyde (P = 0.004)[396], along with an increase in HDL
cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 levels (P = 0.019)[397]. While these results provide some
evidence for the beneficial effects of combination of magnesium, zinc, and vitamins C and E
supplementation on improving glomerular (but not tubular) renal function in type 2 diabetic patients,
and on metabolic control, they do not provide adequate proof of efficacy of these materials alone or
Vanadium is a transition metal that can exist in several oxidation states (-1 to +5), and is widely
present in nature in the form of minerals [398]. It is also found in animals and humans, primarily as
the tetravalent vanadyl cation (VO2+) and the pentavalent vanadate (VO3). The tetravalent form is
the most common intracellular form whereas the pentavalent form predominates in extracellular
body fluids. Animals fed vanadium-deficient diets exhibited an increased rate of spontaneous
abortion, depressed milk production, decreased growth, and premature death. The nutritional
necessity in humans has not been established. The ‘average’ diet in the US supplies approximately
15-60 micrograms of vanadium daily. Foods relatively rich in vanadium include black pepper,
mushrooms, shellfish, parsley, and dill seed. Fresh fruits, vegetables, and oils contain little or no
In vitro and in vivo, vanadium-containing compounds exhibit insulin-mimetic activity primarily due to
their ability to inhibit tyrosine phosphatase activity [117;399-401] and activate a cytosolic tyrosine
kinase [402]. Many of the metabolic effects of insulin including the stimulation of glucose transport,
glycogen synthesis, glucose oxidation, and lipogenesis and anti-lipolysis are mimicked by
vanadate and related peroxovanadium compounds [401;403;404]. In vivo, vanadate and
peroxovanadium compounds significantly lower blood glucose in insulin-dependent and insulin-
resistant diabetic animals in the absence of overt toxicity [405-409]. The glucose-lowering effect of
vanadate is achieved without elevating serum insulin, indicating an insulin mimetic effect and, in
some cases, an insulin sensitizing effect.
In humans with T2D, several small studies of 2-4 weeks duration have indicated small but
significant beneficial effects of vanadate treatment on various indicators of glucose metabolism
[410-415]. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal disturbances: nausea, vomiting,
diarrhea, and cramps. In the study from Cusi et al [415], eleven patients with T2D were treated with
vanadyl sulfate (VS) at a higher dose (150 mg/day) and for a longer period of time (6 weeks) than
in the previous studies. Before and after treatment insulin secretion during an oral glucose
tolerance test, and hepatic glucose production (HGP) along with whole body insulin-mediated
glucose disposal were measured. Treatment significantly improved glycemic control: fasting
plasma glucose (FPG) decreased from 194 ± 16 to 155 ± 15 mg/dl, fructosamine decreased from
348 ± 26 µmol/l to 293 ± 12 µmol/l, and HbA1C decreased from 8.1 ± 0.4 to 7.6 ± 0.4% (all P < 0.01)
without any change in body weight. Subjects had an increased rate of HGP compared with non-
diabetic controls (4.1 ± 0.2 vs. 2.7 ± 0.2 mg/kg lean body mass/min; P < 0.001), which was closely
correlated with FPG (r = 0.56; P < 0.006). Vanadyl sulfate reduced HGP by about 20% (P < 0.01),
and the decline in HGP was correlated with the reduction in FPG (r = 0.60; P < 0.05). VS also
caused a modest increase in insulin-mediated glucose disposal (from 4.3 ± 0.4 to 5.1 ± 0.6 mg/kg
lean body mass/min; P < 0.03), although the improvement in insulin sensitivity did not correlate
with the decline in FPG after treatment (r = -0.16; P = NS). Thus, VS at a dose of 150 mg/day for 6
weeks improves hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity in patients with T2D. The glucose-lowering
effect of VS correlated well with the reduction in HGP, but not with insulin-mediated glucose
disposal, suggesting that liver, rather than muscle, is the primary target of VS action at therapeutic
Vanadium has a poor therapeutic index, and attempts have been made to reduce the dose of
vanadium required for therapeutic effectiveness [398]. Organic forms of vanadium, as opposed to
the inorganic VS, are appear to be safer (in animal studies), more absorbable, and able to deliver a
therapeutic effect up to 50% greater than the inorganic forms [409;416]. An ongoing goal has been
to provide vanadium with increased bioavailability, and in a form that is best able to produce the
desired biological effects [416;417]. As a result, numerous organic complexes of vanadium have
been developed including bis(maltolato)oxovanadium (BMOV), bis(cysteinamide N-
octyl)oxovanadium known as Naglivan, bis(pyrrolidine-N-carbodithioato)oxovanadium, vanadyl-
cysteine methyl ester, and bis-glycinato oxovanadium (BGOV) [409;416;418]. Other forms of
vanadium, including polyoxovanadium [419] and vanadylpicolinate complexes [420] have also
been proposed. The usefulness of these newer formulations as clinical agents for T2D remains to
be determined. Despite the encouraging results of the clinical studies published to date, the safety
of larger doses and use of vanadium salts (or related compounds) for longer periods is unknown
[421]. Thus, the use of supplemental vanadium for the management of diabetes or impaired
glucose tolerance is not recommended at this time.
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (
-3 PUFAs) exhibit a broad array of biological activities in
health and disease, including anti-inflammatory, lipid-lowering, and the prevention of coronary heart
disease [422-427]. The most prominent dietary sources of
-3 PUFAs include fish oils abundant in
eicosapentanoic (EPA) and docosahexanoic (DHA) acids along with plants rich in -linolenic acid.
A primary mechanism of action of
-3 PUFAs is achieved by altering gene expression mediated by
the regulation of the activities or abundance of four families of transcription factors [428-431].
These include the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR ), liver X receptors (,),
hepatic nuclear factor-4, and the sterol regulatory element binding proteins 1 and 2. These
transcription factors play major roles in the regulation of hepatic carbohydrate, fatty acid,
triglyceride, cholesterol and bile acid metabolism.
A large body of epidemiological and clinical trial data suggests that
-3 PUFAs play a significant
role in the prevention of coronary artery disease [424-426]. The most convincing evidence is
derived from four major intervention trials evaluating either fish meal, fish oil, or an -linolenic acid-
enriched spread on hard clinical end-points including myocardial infarction, death from coronary
heart disease, and total mortality [432-435]. In essence, these studies found that supplementation
significantly reduced cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction
and stoke)[433-435] and total mortality [432]. The average recommended intake by an expert panel
of US nutritional scientists is 2.2 g/d of -linolenic acid and 0.65 g/d of EPA plus DHA [436], while
the British Nutrition Foundation has recommended 2.4 g/d of -linolenic acid and 1.2 g/d of EPA
plus DHA [437].
An interim report from The Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS) was presented at the
American Heart Association Meeting in November 2005
([438]. Of 18,645 eligible
participants, 9,326 were given 1,800 milligrams (mg)/day of highly purified EPA capsules as add-on
therapy to a statin. The primary endpoint of the study was experiencing any one of a group of
outcomes that included sudden cardiac death, heart attack, unstable angina (sustained chest pain
due to the heart’s oxygen starvation), or undergoing procedures to reopen blocked arteries, such
as angioplasty/stents or coronary artery bypass surgery. After more than 4.5 years of follow-up, the
primary endpoint was seen in 2.8 percent of patients treated with statins plus EPA compared to 3.5
percent in the statin-only group, represents an approximate 20 percent reduction in risk EPA plus
statin treatment compared to statin treatment alone.
Conflicting results have been reported regarding the effects of fish oil supplementation on glycemic
control in those with glucose intolerance including individuals with T2D. Several early studies
reported detrimental effects [439;440], but subsequent studies with improved design have not
replicated the earlier findings [441-444]. Results from a meta-analysis of pooled data from all RCTs
in which fish oil supplementation was the only intervention in subjects with T2D was recently
published [444]. Eighteen trials including 823 subjects followed for a mean of 12 weeks were
included. Doses of fish oil used ranged from 3 to 18 g/day. The outcomes studied were glycemic
control and lipid levels. Meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant effect of fish oil on
lowering triglycerides (-0.56 mmol/l) and raising LDL cholesterol (0.21 mmol/). No statistically
significant effect was observed for fasting glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, or HDL cholesterol. The
triglyceride-lowering effect and the elevation in LDL cholesterol were most evident in those trials
that recruited hypertriglyceridemic subjects and used higher doses of fish oil. Thus, this meta-
analysis of RCTs showed that fish oil supplementation in T2D lowers triglycerides, raises LDL
cholesterol, and has no statistically significant effect on glycemic control. There is no evidence that
fish oil supplementation adversely effects glucose tolerance, insulin action, or insulin secretion in
non-diabetic individuals [369]. There is some evidence that fish oil may improves defects in insulin
action and prevent alterations in glucose homeostasis and the further development of T2D [445].
A recent report has shown that, in individuals with T2D but without hypertriglyceridemia, fish oil
supplementation for 9 weeks moderately increased blood glucose and decreases insulin sensitivity
Conjugated Linoleic Acid (CLA)
Conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) refers to a group of polyunsaturated fatty acids that are positional
and geometric conjugated dieonic isomers of linoleic acid [447]. The biological activity of CLA was
originally discovered due to its ability to inhibit chemically induced carcinogenesis in rodents
[448;449]. Subsequently, numerous health benefits have been attributed to CLA including activity
as an anti-obesogenic, anti-diabetogenic, and anti-atherosclerotic agent [450;451]. The major
isomers of CLA are the cis-9,trans-11 and the trans-10, cis-12, with their biological activities being
isomer-specific [447]. The major dietary sources of CLA are meat and dairy products. CLA
concentrations in dairy products typically range from 2.8 to 7.0 mg/g fat (frozen yogurt and
condensed milk, respectively), of which the cis-9,trans-11 isomer comprises ~75%-95% of the total
CLA [451]. CLA concentrations in meat typically range from 0.6 to 5.8 mg/g fat (pork and lamb,
respectively), of which the cis-9,trans-11 isomer comprises ~55%-85% of the total CLA [451].
Similar to Ώ-3 PUFAs, CLA isomers are ligands and activators of PPARγ, but with an approximate
10-fold higher affinity (~140-260 nM) [452]. CLA isomers readily undergo extensive metabolism
including elongation and desaturation, yielding additional potential bioactive molecules [450].
In several animal models, CLA has been shown to reduce body fat accumulation, improve glucose
tolerance, and increase insulin sensitivity [453;454]. In individuals with T2D (n =12), plasma trans-
10, cis-12 but not cis-9,trans-11 CLA is inversely correlated with body weight (P < 0.05) and serum
leptin (P < 0.02) [455]. Thus, CLA supplementation has been suggested as a potential new
nutraceutical approach for obesity, a major risk factor for the development of T2D. However,
conflicting results have been reported regarding the beneficial effects of CLA supplementation on
adiposity and metabolism in humans [456-459]. In several studies, administration of CLA (1.8-4.2
g/day) for 12 weeks has been reported to decrease body fat mass (~4%; P < 0.001) in healthy
individuals [460;461] and in overweight and obese individuals [462]. There were no changes in
body weight, serum lipids, or glucose metabolism in these studies.
However, in another study, abdominally obese men (n = 60) were treated with 3.4 g/day CLA
(isomer mixture), purified trans-10, cis-12 CLA, or placebo [463]. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic
clamp, serum hormones, lipids, and anthropometry were assessed before and after 12 weeks of
treatment. Baseline metabolic status was similar between groups. Unexpectedly, trans-10, cis-12
CLA increased insulin resistance (19%; P < 0.01) and glycemia (4%; P < 0.001) and reduced HDL
cholesterol (-4%; P < 0.01) compared with placebo. Body fat, sagittal abdominal diameter, and
weight decreased versus baseline, but the difference was not significantly different from placebo.
The CLA mixture did not change glucose metabolism, body composition, or weight compared with
placebo but lowered HDL cholesterol (-2%; P < 0.05). Trans-10, cis-12 CLA also increases markers
of oxidative stress and inflammation [464], thus revealing important isomer-specific metabolic
actions of CLA in abdominally obese men.
The detrimental effect of the CLA mixture on insulin sensitivity was confirmed by another group.
The effect of CLA supplementation on markers of glucose and insulin metabolism, lipoprotein
metabolism, and inflammatory markers of CVD in subjects with T2D [465]. The study was a
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Thirty-two subjects with stable, diet-controlled
type 2 diabetes received CLA (3.0 g/d; 50:50 blend of cis-9, trans-11 CLA and trans-10, cis-12
CLA) or control for 8 wk. A 3-h 75-g oral-glucose-tolerance test was performed, and fasting plasma
lipid concentrations and inflammatory markers were measured before and after the intervention.
CLA supplementation significantly increased fasting glucose concentrations (6.3%; P < 0.05) and
reduced insulin sensitivity as measured by homeostasis model assessment, oral glucose insulin
sensitivity, and the insulin sensitivity index (composite) (P = 0.05). Total HDL-cholesterol
concentrations increased by 8% (P < 0.05), which was due to a significant increase in HDL(2)-
cholesterol concentrations (P < 0.05). The ratio of LDL to HDL cholesterol was significantly reduced
(P < 0.01). CLA supplementation reduced fibrinogen concentrations (P < 0.01), but had no effect on
inflammatory markers of CVD. Thus, supplementation with a CLA mixture had an adverse effect on
insulin and glucose metabolism.
The effects of trans-10, cis-12 CLA supplementation on plasma proinsulin, insulin, C-peptide and
adiponectin concentrations, including their associations with change in insulin sensitivity, has also
been evaluated [466]. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Fifty-
seven non-diabetic abdominally obese men received either 3.4 g trans-10, cis-12 CLA, CLA-isomer
mixture, or control oil for 12 weeks. Insulin sensitivity (hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp), intact
proinsulin, insulin, the proinsulin: insulin ratio, C-peptide, glucose, and adiponectin were assessed
before and after supplementation. Supplementation with trans-10, cis-12 CLA increased proinsulin
(P < 0.01), the proinsulin : insulin ratio (P < 0.05) and C-peptide concentrations (P < 0.001) in
comparison with control subjects. Adiponectin did not change significantly. The change in
proinsulin, but not the proinsulin: insulin ratio, was related to impaired insulin sensitivity (r = -0.58;
P <0.0001), independently of changes in insulin, C-peptide, glucose, adiponectin and BMI. Thus, in
obese, non-diabetic men, trans-10, cis-12 CLA induced hyperproinsulinemia that was related to
impaired insulin sensitivity, independently of changes in insulin concentrations. These results are of
clinical interest, as hyperproinsulinemia predicts diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In light of
these results, the use of supplemental CLA (mixture or an individual isomer) for the management
of obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, or diabetes is definitely not recommended.
Clearly, many natural products including botanicals and other nutraceuticals have hypoglycemic,
anti-hyperglycemic, insulin sensitizing, anti-hyperlipidemic, anti-hypertensive, and anti-
inflammatory activities. There are published studies reporting the anti-diabetic activity of well-over a
thousand different botanicals and nutraceuticals. The number of those treatments evaluated in
clinical trials is approximately 100 [36]. In the vast major of these trials, the botanicals and
nutraceuticals were evaluated as an adjunct to diet and prescription medications. Fifty-eight of the
trials were controlled, and conducted in individuals with diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance. Of
these, statistically significant treatment effects were reported in 88% of trials (23 of 26) evaluating a
single botanical, and 67% of trials (18 of 27) evaluating individual vitamin or mineral supplements
(reviewed in [36]). When reported, side effects were few and generally mild (gastrointestinal
irritation and nausea).
However, many of the studies suffered from design flaws including small (< 10 subjects) sample
sizes, heterogeneity of subjects, and short-duration of treatment. Furthermore, there is a lack of
multiple studies for many of the individual supplements. Despite the apparent lack of side effects of
these treatments, it would be prudent to be aware of the potential for dietary supplements,
especially botanicals, to interact with a patient’s prescription medication. One of the most important
potential botanical-drug interactions is that of garlic, Trigonella, and Ginkgo biloba with non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including aspirin) or warfarin, as these botanicals possess limited
anti-coagulant activity [102;467]. Another potential interaction of concern is one involving G. biloba,
a botanical widely used for the treatment of memory and concentration problems, confusion,
depression, anxiety, dizziness, tinnitus, and headache [468;469]. Ingestion of G. biloba extract by
patients with T2D may increase the hepatic metabolic clearance rate of not only insulin but also
hypoglycemic medications, resulting in reduced insulin-mediated glucose metabolism and elevated
blood glucose [470]. Another issue to consider with botanicals is the potential for batch-to-batch
variation due to age of the plant, geographic source, time of harvest, and method of drying and
preparation, all of which can dramatically impact the purity and potency of active ingredients. None
of the agents discussed here is recommended for use in pregnant or lactating women, or in
children. Furthermore, patients should be advised on the proper use of any alternative treatment to
avoid the risk of hypoglycemia.
That being stated, several botanical and nutraceutical agents merit consideration as complimentary
approaches for use in patients with T2D. Botanical treatments with the strongest evidence of
clinical safety and efficacy include I. batas (caiapo), T. foenum-graecum (fenugreek), and C.cassia
(cinnamon). Non-botanical nutraceutical agents with promise for improving insulin sensitivity and
glycemic control include α-lipoic acid, chromium picolinate, magnesium, and resveratrol. In
addition, there is evidence that α-lipoic acid improves the symptoms of individuals with
microvascular complications, especially neuropathy. Clearly, Ώ-3 PUFAs (EPA, DHA, α-linolenic
acid) merit strong consideration for lipid lowering, and overall cardiovascular health.
The increasing movement for the public in general and patients with diabetes (and other diseases)
to self-treat using botanicals and nutraceuticals cannot be disputed and should not be ignored.
Health care professionals are urged to increase their knowledge base in this area on an ongoing
basis. They are also urged to pro-actively query patients on their use of these agents, and record
the information obtained in the patient record. Many patients are reluctant to discuss their use of
botanicals and nutraceuticals, so it is important for health care professionals to keep an open mind
and be non-judgmental. Since patients cannot be expected to distinguish between the marketing
hype of manufacturers and evidence derived from credible scientific studies, health care
professionals must be positioned to provide an informed opinion and recommendation (see Table 5
for a selected list of credible sources of information on the internet).
Table 5. Credible Internet Sources for Information on Botanicals, Dietary Supplements,
and other Integrative/Functional Medicine Interventions (Selected examples)
Source Website Address Thumbnail
Council The leading
education using
and traditional
information to
promote the
responsible use
of herbal
Society of
Pharmacognosy Professional
dedicated to
discipline of
(the science and
study of drugs
and natural
compounds with
properties from
natural sources)
The Cochrane
Library An electronic
designed to
provide high
quality scientific
Consumer Independent
product review
site that provides
information on
the content of
including dietary
required for
access to some
An extensive
clearinghouse of
MD Anderson
Medicine Website of
cancer treatment
National Center
and Alternative
National (US)
center that
supports and
research results
and alternative
research report
(2005): Treating
type 2 diabetes
with dietary
Database An extremely
based, and
database on
NIH Office of
(ODS) National (US)
center that
supports and
research results
on dietary
National Institute
of Diabetes&
Digestive &
Therapies for
(albeit abridged)
for some
treatments for
Quackwatch A non-profit
whose purpose
is to combat
frauds, myths,
fads, fallacies,
and misconduct
US FDA Office of
Labeling, and
Supplements FDA office
responsible for
developing policy
and regulations
for dietary
medical foods,
and related
areas, as well as
for their scientific
WebMD Health WebMD provides
information and
tools for
managing health
care. For health
and their patients
(1) Reaven GM. Insulin resistance and its consequences: type 2 diabetes mellitus and
coronary heart disease. In: LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefsky JM, eds. Diabetes Mellitus: A
Fundamental and Clinical Text. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
(2) Reaven GM. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 1988,37,1595-1607
(3) DeFronzo RA. Pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes: metabolic and molecular implications for
identifying diabetes genes. Diabet Rev 1997,5,177-269
(4) Beltran-Sanchez H, Harhay MO, Harhay MM, McElligott S. Prevalence and trends of
metabolic syndrome in the adult U.S. population, 1999-2010. J Am Coll Cardiol
(5) DeFronzo RA, Abdul-Ghani M. Type 2 diabetes can be prevented with early
pharmacological intervention. Diabetes Care 2011,34 Suppl 2,S202-S209
(6) Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea,
metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - Progressive requirement
for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). J Am Med Assoc 1999,281,2005-2012
(7) DeFronzo RA. Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med
(8) Evans JL, Balkan B, Rushakoff RJ. Oral and Injectable (Non-Insulin) Pharmacological
Agents for Type 2 Diabetes. In: De Groot LJaLJLDS, ed. Endotext: Diabetes Mellitus and
Carbohydrate Metabolism---DiabetesManager. 1st ed. South Dartmouth:
(9) Fuhr JP, He H, Goldfarb N, Nash DB. Use of chromium picolinate and biotin in the
management of type 2 diabetes: an economic analysis. Dis Manag 2005,8,265-275
(10) Altman SH, Parks-Thomas C. Controlling spending for prescription drugs. N Engl J Med
(11) Dham S, Shah V, Hirsch S, Banerji MA. The role of complementary and alternative
medicine in diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2006,6,251-258
(12) Cicero AF, Derosa G, Gaddi A. What do herbalists suggest to diabetic patients in order to
improve glycemic control? Evaluation of scientific evidence and potential risks. Acta
Diabetol 2004,41,91-98
(13) Saxena A, Vikram NK. Role of selected Indian plants in management of type 2 diabetes: a
review. J Altern Complement Med 2004,10,369-378
(14) Shekelle PG, Hardy M, Morton SC, Coulter I, Venuturupalli S, Favreau J, Hilton LK. Are
Ayurvedic herbs for diabetes effective? J Fam Pract 2005,54,876-886
(15) Andrade-Cetto A, Heinrich M. Mexican plants with hypoglycemic effect used in the
treatment of diabetes. J Ethnopharmacol 2005,99,325-348
(16) Johnson L, Strich H, Taylor A, Timmermann B, Malone D, Teufel-Shone N, Drummond R,
Woosley R, Pereira E, Martinez A. Use of herbal remedies by diabetic Hispanic women in
the southwestern United States. Phytother Res 2006,20,250-255
(17) Shapiro K, Gong WC. Natural products used for diabetes. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash )
(18) Berman BM, Swyers JP, Kaczmarczyk J. Complementary and alternative medicine:
herbal therapies for diabetes. J Assoc Acad Minor Phys 1999,10,10-14
(19) Grover JK, Yadav S, Vats V. Medicinal plants of India with anti-diabetic potential. J
Ethnopharmacol 2002,81,81-100
(20) Murray MT, Pizzorno JE. Botanical medicine – a modern perspective. Textbook of Natural
Medicine. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
(21) AACE Nutrition Guidelines Task Force. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
medical guidelines for the clinical use of dietary supplements and nutraceuticals. Endocr
Pract 2003,9,417-470
(22) Fontanarosa PB, Rennie D, DeAngelis CD. The need for regulation of dietary
supplements--lessons from ephedra. J Am Med Assoc 2003,289,1568-1570
(23) Kinsel JF, Straus SE. Complementary and alternative therpaeutics: rigorous research is
needed to support claims. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2003,43,463-484
(24) Wolfe SM. Ephedra--scientific evidence versus money/politics. Science 2003,300,437
(25) Bent S, Tiedt TN, Odden MC, Shlipak MG. The relative safety of ephedra compared with
other herbal products. Ann Intern Med 2003,138,468-471
(26) Shekelle PG, Hardy ML, Morton SC, Maglione M, Mojica WA, Suttorp MJ, Rhodes SL,
Jungvig L, Gagne J. Efficacy and safety of ephedra and ephedrine for weight loss and
athletic performance: a meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 2003,289,1537-1545
(27) Becker M. The blood sugar market goes boom! Nutraceuticals World 2012,October 1,1
(28) Yeh GY, Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Phillips RS. Use of complementary and alternative
medicine among persons with diabetes mellitus: results of a national survey. Am J Public
Health 2002,92,1648-1652
(29) Kim C, Kwok YS. Navajo use of native healers. Arch Intern Med 1998,158,2245-2249
(30) Mull DS, Nguyen N, Mull JD. Vietnamese diabetic patients and their physicians: what
ethnography can teach us. West J Med 2001,175,307-311
(31) Noel PH, Pugh JA, Larme AC, Marsh G. The use of traditional plant medicines for non-
insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in South Texas. Phytother Res 2003,11,512-517
(32) Villa-Caballero L, Morello CM, Chynoweth ME, Prieto-Rosinol A, Polonsky WH, Palinkas
LA, Edelman SV. Ethnic differences in complementary and alternative medicine use
among patients with diabetes. Complement Ther Med 2010,18,241-248
(33) Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, Appel S, Wilkey S, Van Rompay M, Kessler RC.
Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up
national survey. J Am Med Assoc 1998,280,1569-1575
(34) American Diabetes Association. Unproven therapies. Diabetes Care 2003,26 (Suppl
(35) Forouhar E, Sack P. Non-traditional therapies for diabetes: fact or fiction. J Community
Hosp Intern Med Perspect 2012,2
(36) Yeh GY, Eisenberg DM, Kaptchuk TJ, Phillips RS. Systematic review of herbs and dietary
supplements for glycemic control in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003,26,1277-1294
(37) Dey L, Attele AS, Yuan CS. Alternative therapies for type 2 diabetes. Altern Med Rev
(38) Evans JL, Maddux BA, Goldfine ID. Antioxidants in diabetic complications and insulin
resistance. In: Raz I, Skyler JS, Shafrir E, eds. Diabetes: From Research to Diagnosis
and Treatment. 1st ed. London: Martin Dunitz; 2003:479-496.
(39) Antioxidants in Diabetes Management. 1st ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2000 Oxidative
Stress and Disease.
(40) Russell WR, Baka A, Bjorck I, Delzenne N, Gao D, Griffiths HR, Hadjilucas E, Juvonen K,
Lahtinen S, Lansink M, van LL, Mykkanen H, Ostman E, Riccardi G, Vinoy S, Weickert
MO. Impact of diet composition on blood glucose regulation. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr
2013,Epub ahead of print.
(41) Ha T, Lean MEJ. Diet and lifestyle modification in the management of non-insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus. In: Pickup JC, Williams G, eds. Textbook of Diabetes. 2nd
ed. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1997:1-18.
(42) Jenkins DJA, Jenkins AL, Kendall CWC. Dietary therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus:
spreading the nutrient load. In: LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefsky JM, eds. Diabetes Mellitus: A
Fundamental and Clinical Text. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
(43) Costacou T, Mayer-Davis EJ. Nutrition and prevention of type 2 diabetes. Annu Rev Nutr
(44) Youngren JF. Exercise and the regulation of blood glucose. In: Degroot L, Goldfine ID,
Rushakoff RJ, eds. Diabetes and Carbohydrate Metabolism. 1st ed.
Internet-based:; 3
(45) Watts NB, Spanheimer RG, DiGirolamo M, Gebhart SS, Musey VC, Siddiq YK, Phillips
LS. Prediction of glucose response to weight loss in patients with non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1990,150,803-806
(46) Wing RR, Koeske R, Epstein LH, Nowalk MP, Gooding W, Becker D. Long-term effects of
modest weight loss in type II diabetic patients. Arch Intern Med 1987,147,1749-1753
(47) Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab
Disord 1992,16,397-415
(48) Gillett M, Royle P, Snaith A, Scotland G, Poobalan A, Imamura M, Black C, Boroujerdi M,
Jick S, Wyness L, McNamee P, Brennan A, Waugh N. Non-pharmacological interventions
to reduce the risk of diabetes in people with impaired glucose regulation: a systematic
review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2012,16,1-236
(49) Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, Hoogwerf BJ,
Lichtenstein AH, Mayer-Davis E, Mooradian AD, Wheeler ML. Nutrition recommendations
and interventions for diabetes--2006: a position statement of the American Diabetes
Association. Diabetes Care 2006,29,2140-2157
(50) Diabetes Medical Guidelines Task Force. The American Association of Clinical
Endocrinologists medical guidelines for the management of diabetes mellitus: the AACE
system of intensive diabetes self-management-2002 update. Endocr Pract 2002,8
(51) Chandalia M, Garg A, Lutjohann D, von Bergmann K, Grundy SM, Brinkley LJ. Beneficial
effects of high dietary fiber intake in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med
(52) Vuksan V, Sievenpiper JL, Owen R, Swilley JA, Spadafora P, Jenkins DJ, Vidgen E,
Brighenti F, Josse RG, Leiter LA, Xu Z, Novokmet R. Beneficial effects of viscous dietary
fiber from Konjac-mannan in subjects with the insulin resistance syndrome: results of a
controlled metabolic trial. Diabetes Care 2000,23,9-14
(53) Frape DL, Jones AM. Chronic and postprandial responses of plasma insulin, glucose and
lipids in volunteers given dietary fibre supplements. Br J Nutr 1995,73,733-751
(54) Lakhdar A, Farish E, McLaren EH. Fibre and patients with diabetes. Br Med J
(55) He FJ, Nowson CA, MacGregor GA. Fruit and vegetable consumption and stroke: meta-
analysis of cohort studies. Lancet 2006,367,320-326
(56) Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, Carnethon M, Daniels S, Franch HA, Franklin B,
Kris-Etherton P, Harris WS, Howard B, Karanja N, Lefevre M, Rudel L, Sacks F, Van HL,
Winston M, Wylie-Rosett J. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific
statement from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation
(57) Stanner SA, Hughes J, Kelly CN, Buttriss J. A review of the epidemiological evidence for
the 'antioxidant hypothesis'. Public Health Nutr 2004,7,407-422
(58) van Dam RM, Hu FB. Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic
review. J Am Med Assoc 2005,294,97-104
(59) Silva FM, Kramer CK, de Almeida JC, Steemburgo T, Gross JL, Azevedo MJ. Fiber intake
and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review with
meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutr Rev 2013,71,790-801
(60) Lee DH, Folsom AR, Harnack L, Halliwell B, Jacobs DR, Jr. Does supplemental vitamin C
increase cardiovascular disease risk in women with diabetes? Am J Clin Nutr
(61) Liu S, Lee IM, Song Y, Van DM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE. Vitamin E and risk of
type 2 diabetes in the women's health study randomized controlled trial. Diabetes
(62) Lonn E, Bosch J, Yusuf S, Sheridan P, Pogue J, Arnold JM, Ross C, Arnold A, Sleight P,
Probstfield J, Dagenais GR. Effects of long-term vitamin E supplementation on
cardiovascular events and cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc
(63) Boshtam M, Rafiei M, Golshadi ID, Ani M, Shirani Z, Rostamshirazi M. Long term effects
of oral vitamin E supplement in type II diabetic patients. Int J Vitam Nutr Res
(64) Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, Dunbar SA, Franz MJ, Mayer-Davis EJ, Neumiller JJ,
Nwankwo R, Verdi CL, Urbanski P, Yancy WS, Jr. Nutrition therapy recommendations for
the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013,36,3821-3842
(65) Keys A. Mediterranean diet and public health: personal reflections. Am J Clin Nutr
1995,619 (6 Suppl),1321S-1323S
(66) Curtis BM, O'Keefe JH, Jr. Understanding the Mediterranean diet. Could this be the new
"gold standard" for heart disease prevention? Postgrad Med 2002,112,35
(67) de LM, Salen P. The Mediterranean-style diet for the prevention of cardiovascular
diseases. Public Health Nutr 2006,9,118-123
(68) Willett WC. The Mediterranean diet: science and practice. Public Health Nutr 2006,9,105-
(69) Serra-Majem L, Roman B, Estruch R. Scientific evidence of interventions using the
Mediterranean diet: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2006,64,S27-S47
(70) Trichopoulou A. Mediterranean diet: the past and the present. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
2001,11 (4 Suppl),1-4
(71) Schroder H. Protective mechanisms of the Mediterranean diet in obesity and type 2
diabetes. J Nutr Biochem 2006,Epub ahead of print
(72) Estruch R, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Corella D, Salas-Salvado J, Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Covas
MI, Fiol M, Gomez-Gracia E, Lopez-Sabater MC, Vinyoles E, Aros F, Conde M, Lahoz C,
Lapetra J, Saez G, Ros E. Effects of a Mediterranean-style diet on cardiovascular risk
factors: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2006,145,1-11
(73) Biesalski HK. Diabetes preventive components in the Mediterranean diet. Eur J Nutr
2004,43 Suppl 1,I/26-I/30
(74) Panagiotakos DB, Pitsavos C, Chrysohoou C, Stefanadis C. The epidemiology of type 2
diabetes mellitus in Greek adults: the ATTICA study. Diabet Med 2005,22,1581-1588
(75) Hung HC, Joshipura KJ, Jiang R, Hu FB, Hunter D, Smith-Warner SA, Colditz GA, Rosner
B, Spiegelman D, Willett WC. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of major chronic
disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004,96,1577-1584
(76) Fraga CG. Cocoa, diabetes, and hypertension: should we eat more chocolate? Am J Clin
Nutr 2005,81,541-542
(77) Fisher ND, Hughes M, Gerhard-Herman M, Hollenberg NK. Flavanol-rich cocoa induces
nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilation in healthy humans. J Hypertens 2003,21,2281-2286
(78) Fisher ND, Hollenberg NK. Flavanols for cardiovascular health: the science behind the
sweetness. J Hypertens 2005,23,1453-1459
(79) Rein D, Lotito S, Holt RR, Keen CL, Schmitz HH, Fraga CG. Epicatechin in human
plasma: in vivo determination and effect of chocolate consumption on plasma oxidation
status. J Nutr 2000,130,2109S-2114S
(80) Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Alexopoulos N, Economou E, Andreadou I, Stefanadis C.
Effect of dark chocolate on arterial function in healthy individuals. Am J Hypertens
(81) Grassi D, Lippi C, Necozione S, Desideri G, Ferri C. Short-term administration of dark
chocolate is followed by a significant increase in insulin sensitivity and a decrease in
blood pressure in healthy persons. Am J Clin Nutr 2005,81,611-614
(82) Grassi D, Necozione S, Lippi C, Croce G, Valeri L, Pasqualetti P, Desideri G, Blumberg
JB, Ferri C. Cocoa reduces blood pressure and insulin resistance and improves
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in hypertensives. Hypertension 2005,46,398-405
(83) Griggs B. Green Pharmacy. A history of herbal medicine. 1st ed. London: Robert Hale;
(84) Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin. N Engl J Med 1996,334,574-579
(85) Witters LA. The blooming of the French lilac. J Clin Invest 2001,108,1105-1107
(86) Cusi K, DeFronzo RA. Metformin: a review of its metabolic effects. Diabetes Rev
(87) Oubre AY, Carlson TJ, King SR, Reaven GM. From plant to patient: An ethnomedical
approach to the identification of new drugs for the treatment of NIDDM. Diabetologia
(88) Ackerknecht EH. A Short History of Medicine (revised edition). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
Unversity Press; 1982.
(89) Bailey CJ, Day C. Traditional plant medicine as treatments for diabetes. Diabetes Care
(90) Marles RJ, Farnsworth NR. Plants as sources of antidiabetic agents. Economic and
Medical Plant Research 1993,6,149-187
(91) Marles RJ, Farnsworth NR. Antidiabetic plants and their active constituents. Phytomed
(92) Haddad PS, Depot M, Settaf A, Cherrah Y. Use of antidiabetic plants in Morocco and
Quebec. Diabetes Care 2001,24,608-609
(93) Jung M, Park M, Lee HC, Kang YH, Kang ES, Kim SK. Antidiabetic agents from medicinal
plants. Curr Med Chem 2006,13,1203-1218
(94) Kusano S, Abe H. Antidiabetic activity of white skinned sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)
in obese Zucker fatty rats. Biol Pharm Bull 2000,23,23-26
(95) Kusano S, Abe H, Tamura H. Isolation of antidiabetic components from white-skinned
sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.). Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2001,65,109-114
(96) Ludvik BH, Mahdjoobian K, Waldhaeusl W, Hofer A, Prager R, Kautzky-Willer A, Pacini G.
The effect of Ipomoea batatas (Caiapo) on glucose metabolism and serum cholesterol in
patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized study. Diabetes Care 2002,25,239-240
(97) Ludvik B, Waldhausl W, Prager R, Kautzky-Willer A, Pacini G. Mode of action of ipomoea
batatas (Caiapo) in type 2 diabetic patients. Metabolism 2003,52,875-880
(98) Ludvik B, Neuffer B, Pacini G. Efficacy of Ipomoea batatas (Caiapo) on diabetes control in
type 2 diabetic subjects treated with diet. Diabetes Care 2004,27,436-440
(99) Evans JL, Balkan B, Rushakoff RJ. Oral and Injectable (Non-Insulin) Pharmacological
Agents for Type 2 Diabetes. In: De Groot LJaLJLDS, ed. Endotext: Diabetes Mellitus and
Carbohydrate Metabolism---DiabetesManager. 1st ed. South Dartmouth:
(100) Bloomgarden ZT, Dodis R, Viscoli CM, Holmboe ES, Inzucchi SE. Lower baseline
glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy: a meta-regression
analysis. Diabetes Care 2006,29,2137-2139
(101) Ludvik B, Hanefeld M, Pacini G. Improved metabolic control by Ipomoea batatas (Caiapo)
is associated with increased adiponectin and decreased fibrinogen levels in type 2
diabetic subjects. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007,Epub ahead of print
(102) Anonymous. PDR for Herbal Medicines. 1st ed ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co;
(103) Brasch E, Ulbricht C, Kuo G, Szapary P, Smith M. Therapeutic applications of fenugreek.
Altern Med Rev 2003,8,20-27
(104) Rizvi SI, Mishra N. Traditional Indian medicines used for the management of diabetes
mellitus. J Diabetes Res 2013,2013,712092
(105) Sauvaire Y, Petit P, Broca C, Manteghetti M, Baissac Y, Fernandez-Alvarez J, Gross R,
Roye M, Leconte A, Gomis R, Ribes G. 4-Hydroxyisoleucine: a novel amino acid
potentiator of insulin secretion. Diabetes 1998,47,206-210
(106) Broca C, Manteghetti M, Gross R, Baissac Y, Jacob M, Petit P, Sauvaire Y, Ribes G. 4-
Hydroxyisoleucine: effects of synthetic and natural analogues on insulin secretion. Eur J
Pharmacol 2000,390,339-345
(107) Broca C, Gross R, Petit P, Sauvaire Y, Manteghetti M, Tournier M, Masiello P, Gomis R,
Ribes G. 4-Hydroxyisoleucine: experimental evidence of its insulinotropic and antidiabetic
properties. Am J Physiol 1999,277,E617-E623
(108) Perla V, Jayanty SS. Biguanide related compounds in traditional antidiabetic functional
foods. Food Chem 2013,138,1574-1580
(109) Madar Z, Abel R, Samish S, Arad J. Glucose-lowering effect of fenugreek in non-insulin
dependent diabetics. Eur J Clin Nutr 1988,42,51-54
(110) Sharma RD, Sarkar A, Hazra DK. Use of fenugreek seed powder in the management of
non-inslin dependent diabetes mellitus. Nutr Res 1996,16,1331-1339
(111) Gupta A, Gupta R, Lal B. Effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) seeds on
glycaemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double blind
placebo controlled study. J Assoc Physicians India 2001,49,1057-1061
(112) Kochhar A, Nagi M. Effect of supplementation of traditional medicinal plants on blood
glucose in non-insulin-dependent diabetics: a pilot study. J Med Food 2005,8,545-549
(113) Flammang AM, Cifone MA, Erexson GL, Stankowski LF, Jr. Genotoxicity testing of a
fenugreek extract. Food Chem Toxicol 2004,42,1769-1775
(114) Roberts KT. The potential of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum) as a functional food
and nutraceutical and its effects on glycemia and lipidemia. J Med Food 2011,14,1485-
(115) Khan A, Bryden NA, Polansky MM, Anderson RA. Insulin potentiating factor and
chromium content of selected foods and spices. Biol Trace Element Res 1990,24,183-188
(116) Berrio LF, Polansky MM, Anderson RA. Insulin activity: stimulatory effects of cinnamon
and brewer's yeast as influenced by albumin. Horm Res 1992,37,225-229
(117) Evans JL, Jallal B. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: their role in insulin action and potential
as drug targets. Exp Opin Invest Drugs 1999,8,139-160
(118) Imparl-Radosevich J, Deas S, Polansky MM, Baedke DA, Ingebritsen TS, Anderson RA,
Graves DJ. Regulation of PTP-1 and insulin receptor kinase by fractions from cinnamon:
implications for cinnamon regulation of insulin signalling. Horm Res 1998,50,177-182
(119) Khan A, Safdar M, li Khan MM, Khattak KN, Anderson RA. Cinnamon improves glucose
and lipids of people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003,26,3215-3218
(120) Mang B, Wolters M, Schmitt B, Kelb K, Lichtinghagen R, Stichtenoth DO, Hahn A. Effects
of a cinnamon extract on plasma glucose, HbA, and serum lipids in diabetes mellitus type
2. Eur J Clin Invest 2006,36,340-344
(121) Vanschoonbeek K, Thomassen BJ, Senden JM, Wodzig WK, van Loon LJ. Cinnamon
supplementation does not improve glycemic control in postmenopausal type 2 diabetes
patients. J Nutr 2006,136,977-980
(122) Allen RW, Schwartzman E, Baker WL, Coleman CI, Phung OJ. Cinnamon use in type 2
diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Fam Med 2013,11,452-
(123) Nag B, Medicherla S, Sharma SD. Orally active fraction of momordica charantia, active
peptides thereof, and their use in the treatment of diabetes. US Patent 2002,6,391,854,1-
(124) Krawinkel MB, Keding GB. Bitter gourd (Momordica Charantia): A dietary approach to
hyperglycemia. Nutr Rev 2006,64,331-337
(125) Basch E, Gabardi S, Ulbricht C. Bitter melon (Momordica charantia): a review of efficacy
and safety. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003,60,356-359
(126) Ooi CP, Yassin Z, Hamid TA. Momordica charantia for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane
Database Syst Rev 2012,8,CD007845
(127) Pothuraju R, Sharma RK, Chagalamarri J, Jangra S, Kumar KP. A systematic review of
Gymnema sylvestre in obesity and diabetes management. J Sci Food Agric 2013,
(128) Roman-Ramos R, Flores-Saenz JL, Alarcon-Aguilar FJ. Anti-hyperglycemic effect of
some edible plants. J Ethnopharmacol 1995,48,25-32
(129) El Kossori RL, Villaume C, El Boustani E, Sauvaire Y, Mejean L. Composition of pulp, skin
and seeds of prickly pears fruit (Opuntia ficus indica sp.). Plant Foods Hum Nutr
(130) Frati AC, Gordillo BE, Altamirano P, Ariza CR, Cortes-Franco R, Chavez-Negrete A. Acute
hypoglycemic effect of Opuntia streptacantha Lemaire in NIDDM. Diabetes Care
(131) Frati-Munari AC, Gordillo BE, Altamirano P, Ariza CR. Hypoglycemic effect of Opuntia
streptacantha Lemaire in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1988,11,63-66
(132) Godard MP, Ewing BA, Pischel I, Ziegler A, Benedek B, Feistel B. Acute blood glucose
lowering effects and long-term safety of OpunDia supplementation in pre-diabetic males
and females. J Ethnopharmacol 2010,130,631-634
(133) Azad Khan AK, Akhtar S, Mahtab H. Coccinia indica in the treatment of patients with
diabetes mellitus. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 1979,5,60-66
(134) Kuriyan R, Rajendran R, Bantwal G, Kurpad AV. Effect of supplementation of Coccinia
cordifolia extract on newly detected diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2008,31,216-220
(135) Xie JT, Mchendale S, Yuan CS. Ginseng and diabetes. Am J Chin Med 2005,33,397-404
(136) Vogler BK, Pittler MH, Ernst E. The efficacy of ginseng. A systematic review of
randomised clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1999,55,567-575
(137) Sievenpiper JL, Arnason JT, Vidgen E, Leiter LA, Vuksan V. A systematic quantitative
analysis of the literature of the high variability in ginseng (Panax spp.): should ginseng be
trusted in diabetes? Diabetes Care 2004,27,839-840
(138) Vuksan V, Sievenpiper JL. Herbal remedies in the management of diabetes: lessons
learned from the study of ginseng. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2005,15,149-160
(139) Sotaniemi EA, Haapakoski E, Rautio A. Ginseng therapy in non-insulin-dependent
diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1995,18,1373-1375
(140) Vuksan V, Sievenpiper JL, Koo VY, Francis T, Beljan-Zdravkovic U, Xu Z, Vidgen E.
American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L) reduces postprandial glycemia in nondiabetic
subjects and subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med 2000,160,1009-1013
(141) Vuksan V, Sung MK, Sievenpiper JL, Stavro PM, Jenkins AL, Di BM, Lee KS, Leiter LA,
Nam KY, Arnason JT, Choi M, Naeem A. Korean red ginseng (Panax ginseng) improves
glucose and insulin regulation in well-controlled, type 2 diabetes: results of a randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled study of efficacy and safety. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis
(142) Mucalo I, Rahelic D, Jovanovski E, Bozikov V, Romic Z, Vuksan V. Effect of American
ginseng (Panax quinquefolius L.) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Coll Antropol
(143) Vogler BK, Ernst E. Aloe vera: a systematic review of its clinical effectiveness. Br J Gen
Pract 1999,49,823-828
(144) Al Rowais NA. Herbal medicine in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Saudi Med J
(145) Ghannam N, Kingston M, Al Meshaal IA, Tariq M, Parman NS, Woodhouse N. The
antidiabetic activity of aloes: preliminary clinical and experimental observations. Horm
Res 1986,24,288-294
(146) Yongchaiyudha S, Rungpitarangsi V, Bunyapraphatsara N, Chokechaijaroenporn O.
Antidiabetic activity of Aloe vera L. juice: I. Clinical trial in new cases of diabetes mellitus.
Phytomed 1996,3,241-243
(147) Bunyapraphatsara N, Yongchaiyudha S, Rungpitarangsi V, Chokechaijaroenporn O.
Antidiabetic activity of Aloe vera L. juice: II. Clinical trial in diabetes mellitus patients in
combination with glibenclamide. Phytomed 1996,3,245-248
(148) Vuksan V, Jenkins DJA, Spadafora P, Sievenpiper JL, Owen R, Vidgen E, Brighenti F,
Josse R, Leiter LA, BruceThompson C. Konjac-Mannan (Glucomannan) improves
glycemia and other associated risk factors for coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes -
A randomized controlled metabolic trial. Diabetes Care 1999,22,913-919
(149) Huseini HF, Kianbakht S, Hajiaghaee R, Dabaghian FH. Anti-hyperglycemic and anti-
hypercholesterolemic effects of Aloe vera leaf gel in hyperlipidemic type 2 diabetic
patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Planta Med
(150) Banerjee SK, Maulik SK. Effect of garlic on cardiovascular disorders: a review. Nutr J
(151) Borek C. Garlic reduces dementia and heart-disease risk. J Nutr 2006,136,810S-812S
(152) Budoff M. Aged garlic extract retards progression of coronary artery calcification. J Nutr
(153) Ahmad MS, Ahmed N. Antiglycation properties of aged garlic extract: possible role in
prevention of diabetic complications. J Nutr 2006,136,796S-799S
(154) Kendler BS. Garlic (Allium sativum) and onion (Allium cepa): a review of their relationship
to cardiovascular disease. Prev Med 1987,16,670-685
(155) Keys A. Wine, garlic, and CHD in seven countries. Lancet 1980,1,145-146
(156) Kris-Etherton PM, Etherton TD, Carlson J, Gardner C. Recent discoveries in inclusive
food-based approaches and dietary patterns for reduction in risk for cardiovascular
disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2002,13,397-407
(157) Ashraf R, Aamir K, Shaikh AR, Ahmed T. Effects of garlic on dyslipidemia in patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2005,17,60-64
(158) Kumar R, Chhatwal S, Arora S, Sharma S, Singh J, Singh N, Bhandari V, Khurana A.
Antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic, anti-inflammatory and adenosine deaminase-
lowering effects of garlic in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with obesity. Diabetes
Metab Syndr Obes 2013,6,49-56
(159) Covington MB. Traditional Chinese medicine in the treament of diabetes. Diabetes
Spectrum 2001,14,154-159
(160) Yan XF, Ni Q, Wei JP, Lin L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of type 2 diabetes
mellitus treatment based on the "Three-Typed Syndrome Differentiation" theory in
Chinese medicine. Chin J Integr Med 2013,
(161) Swinburn BA, Ravussin E. Energy and macronutrient metabolism. Baillieres Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1994,8,527-548
(162) Jia W, Gao W, Tang L. Antidiabetic herbal drugs officially approved in China. Phytother
Res 2003,17,1127-1134
(163) Liu JP, Zhang M, Wang WY, Grimsgaard S. Chinese herbal medicines for type 2 diabetes
mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004,Issue 3,CD003642
(164) Li WL, Zheng HC, Bukuru J, De KN. Natural medicines used in the traditional Chinese
medical system for therapy of diabetes mellitus. J Ethnopharmacol 2004,92,1-21
(165) Jia W, Gao WY, Xiao PG. Antidiabetic drugs of plant origin used in China: compositions,
pharmacology, and hypoglycemic mechanisms. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi
(166) Li WW, Guo H, Li HH, Wang LL, Fu H, Wang XM. Integration of traditional Chinese
medicines and Western medicines for treating diabetes mellitus with coronary heart
disease: a systematic review. J Altern Complement Med 2013,19,492-500
(167) Brownlee M. Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature
(168) Evans JL, Maddux BA, Goldfine ID. The molecular basis for oxidative stress-induced
insulin resistance. Antioxid Redox Signal 2005,7,1040-1052
(169) Evans JL, Goldfine ID, Maddux BA, Grodsky GM. Are oxidative stress-activated signaling
pathways mediators of insulin resistance and b-cell dysfunction? Diabetes 2003,52,1-8
(170) Evans JL, Goldfine ID, Maddux BA, Grodsky GM. Oxidative stress and stress-activated
signaling pathways: a unifying hypothesis of type 2 diabetes. Endocr Rev 2002,23,599-
(171) Evans JL, Youngren JF, Goldfine ID. Effective treatments for insulin resistance: trim the
fat and douse the fire. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004,15,425-431
(172) Henriksen EJ. Exercise training and the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of
insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med 2006,40,3-12
(173) Evans JL, Goldfine ID. a-Lipoic acid: a multi-functional antioxidant that improves insulin
sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Therap 2000,2,401-413
(174) Packer L, Cadenas E. Lipoic acid: energy metabolism and redox regulation of
transcription and cell signaling. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2011,48,26-32
(175) Chen WL, Kang CH, Wang SG, Lee HM. Alpha-Lipoic acid regulates lipid metabolism
through induction of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) and activation of AMP-activated protein kinase.
Diabetologia 2012,55,1824-1835
(176) Biewenga GP, Haenen GR, Bast A. The role of lipoic acid in the treatment of diabetic
polyneuropathy. Drug Metab Rev 1997,29,1025-1054
(177) Ziegler D, Gries FA. Alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of diabetic peripheral and cardiac
autonomic neuropathy. Diabetes 1997,46 Suppl 2,S62-S66
(178) Ziegler D, Reljanovic M, Mehnert H, Gries FA. Alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of
diabetic polyneuropathy in Germany: current evidence from clinical trials. Exp Clin
Endocrinol Diabetes 1999,107,421-430
(179) Ziegler D, Nowak H, Kempler P, Vargha P, Low PA. Treatment of symptomatic diabetic
polyneuropathy with the antioxidant alpha-lipoic acid: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med
(180) Ziegler D. Thioctic acid for patients with symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy: a critical
review. Treat Endocrinol 2004,3,173-189
(181) Gidal BE. New and emerging treatment options for neuropathic pain. Am J Manag Care
2006,12 (9 Suppl),S269-S278
(182) Ziegler D, Ametov A, Barinov A, Dyck PJ, Gurieva I, Low PA, Munzel U, Yakhno N, Raz I,
Novosadova M, Maus J, Samigullin R. Oral treatment with alpha-lipoic acid improves
symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy: the SYDNEY 2 trial. Diabetes Care 2006,29,2365-
(183) Han T, Bai J, Liu W, Hu Y. A systematic review and meta-analysis of alpha-lipoic acid in
the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Eur J Endocrinol 2012,167,465-471
(184) Masharani U, Gjerde C, Evans JL, Youngren JF, Goldfine ID. Effects of controlled-release
alpha lipoic acid in lean, nondiabetic patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. J Diabetes
Sci Technol 2010,4,359-364
(185) Porasuphatana S, Suddee S, Nartnampong A, Konsil J, Harnwong B, Santaweesuk A.
Glycemic and oxidative status of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus following oral
administration of alpha-lipoic acid: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled study.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2012,21,12-21
(186) Ansar H, Mazloom Z, Kazemi F, Hejazi N. Effect of alpha-lipoic acid on blood glucose,
insulin resistance and glutathione peroxidase of type 2 diabetic patients. Saudi Med J
(187) Koh EH, Lee WJ, Lee SA, Kim EH, Cho EH, Jeong E, Kim DW, Kim MS, Park JY, Park
KG, Lee HJ, Lee IK, Lim S, Jang HC, Lee KH, Lee KU. Effects of alpha-lipoic acid on
body weight in obese subjects. Am J Med 2011,124,85-88
(188) Ratliff JC, Palmese LB, Reutenauer EL, Tek C. An open-label pilot trial of alpha-lipoic acid
for weight loss in patients with schizophrenia without diabetes. Clin Schizophr Relat
Psychoses 2013,1-13
(189) Uchigata Y. The novel agent, alpha lipoic acid, can cause the development of insulin
autoimmune syndrome. Intern Med 2007,46,1321-1322
(190) Takeuchi Y, Miyamoto T, Kakizawa T, Shigematsu S, Hashizume K. Insulin Autoimmune
Syndrome possibly caused by alpha lipoic acid. Intern Med 2007,46,237-239
(191) Uchigata Y, Hirata Y, Iwamoto Y. Drug-induced insulin autoimmune syndrome. Diabetes
Res Clin Pract 2009,83,e19-e20
(192) Jacob S, Henriksen EJ, Schiemann AL, Simon I, Clancy DE, Tritschler HJ, Jung WI,
Augustin HJ, Dietze GJ. Enhancement of glucose disposal in patients with type 2
diabetes by alpha-lipoic acid. Arzneimittel-Forschung 1995,45,872-874
(193) Jacob S, Henriksen EJ, Tritschler HJ, Augustin HJ, Dietze GJ. Improvement of insulin-
stimulated glucose-disposal in type 2 diabetes after repeated parenteral administration of
thioctic acid. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 1996,104,284-288
(194) Jacob S, Rett K, Henriksen EJ, Haring HU. Thioctic acid: effects on insulin sensitivity and
glucose metabolism. BioFactors 1999,10,169-174
(195) Jacob S, Ruus P, Hermann R, Tritschler HJ, Maerker E, Renn W, Augustin HJ, Dietze GJ,
Rett K. Oral administration of RAC-alpha-lipoic acid modulates insulin sensitivity in
patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a placebo-controlled pilot trial. Free Radic Biol Med
(196) Konrad T, Vicini P, Kusterer K, Hoflich A, Assadkhani A, Bohles HJ, Sewell A, Tritschler
HJ, Cobelli C, Usadel KH. Alpha-lipoic acid treatment decreases serum lactate and
pyruvate concentrations and improves glucose effectiveness in lean and obese patients
with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999,22,280-287
(197) Evans JL, Heymann CJ, Goldfine ID, Gavin LA. Pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and
fructosamine-lowering effect of a novel, controlled release formulation of a-lipoic acid.
Endocr Pract 2002,8,29-35
(198) Pjodkowaki RA, Grotz VL, Mudalar S, Henry RR. The effects of alpha-lipoic acid on
glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetes [abstract]. J Invest Med 2002;50:71A-71A
(Abstract 382).
(199) Rudich A, Tirosh A, Potashnik R, Khamaisi M, Bashan N. Lipoic acid protects against
oxidative stress induced impairment in insulin stimulation of protein kinase B and glucose
transport in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Diabetologia 1999,42,949-957
(200) Maddux BA, See W, Lawrence JC, Jr., Goldfine AL, Goldfine ID, Evans JL. Protection
against oxidative stress-induced insulin resistance in rat L6 muscle cells by micromolar
concentrations of a-lipoic acid. Diabetes 2001,50,404-410
(201) Zhang WJ, Frei B. Alpha-lipoic acid inhibits TNF-alpha-induced NF-kappaB activation and
adhesion molecule expression in human aortic endothelial cells. FASEB J 2001,15,2423-
(202) Birnbaum MJ. Turning down insulin signaling. J Clin Invest 2001,108,655-659
(203) Barnes PJ, Karin M. Nuclear factor-kappaB: a pivotal transcription factor in chronic
inflammatory diseases. N Engl J Med 1997,336,1066-1071
(204) Mohamed AK, Bierhaus A, Schiekofer S, Tritschler H, Ziegler R, Nawroth PP. The role of
oxidative stress and NF-kB activation in late diabetic complications. BioFactors
(205) Bierhaus A, Schiekofer S, Schwaninger M, Andrassy M, Humpert PM, Chen J, Hong M,
Luther T, Henle T, Kloting I, Morcos M, Hofmann M, Tritschler H, Weigle B, Kasper M,
Smith M, Perry G, Schmidt AM, Stern DM, Haring HU, Schleicher E, Nawroth PP.
Diabetes-associated sustained activation of the transcription factor nuclear factor-kappaB.
Diabetes 2001,50,2792-2808
(206) Bierhaus A, Chevion S, Chevion M, Hofmann M, Quehenberger P, Illmer T, Luther T,
Berentshtein E, Tritschler HJ, Muller M, Wahl P, Ziegler R, Nawroth PP. Advanced
glycation end product-induced activation of NF-kappaB is suppressed by alpha-lipoic acid
in cultured endothelial cells. Diabetes 1997,46,1481-1490
(207) Packer L. alpha-Lipoic acid: a metabolic antioxidant which regulates NF-kappa B signal
transduction and protects against oxidative injury. Drug Metab Rev 1998,30,245-275
(208) Hofmann MA, Schiekofer S, Kanitz M, Klevesath MS, Joswig M, Lee V, Morcos M,
Tritschler H, Ziegler R, Wahl P, Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP. Insufficient glycemic control
increases nuclear factor-kappa B binding activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells
isolated from patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1998,21,1310-1316
(209) Hofmann MA, Schiekofer S, Isermann B, Kanitz M, Henkels M, Joswig M, Treusch A,
Morcos M, Weiss T, Borcea V, Abdel Khalek AK, Amiral J, Tritschler H, Ritz E, Wahl P,
Ziegler R, Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated from
patients with diabetic nephropathy show increased activation of the oxidative-stress
sensitive transcription factor NF-kappaB. Diabetologia 1999,42,222-232
(210) Ruan H, Hacohen N, Golub TR, Van Parijs L, Lodish HF. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha
suppresses adipocyte-specific genes and activates expression of preadipocyte genes in
3T3-L1 adipocytes: nuclear factor-kappaB activation by TNF-alpha is obligatory. Diabetes
(211) Rossi A, Kapahi P, Natoli G, Takahashi T, Chen Y, Karin M, Santoro MG. Anti-
inflammatory cyclopentenone prostaglandins are direct inhibitors of IkappaB kinase.
Nature 2000,403,103-108
(212) Yuan M, Konstantopoulos N, Lee J, Hansen L, Li ZW, Karin M, Shoelson SE. Reversal of
obesity- and diet-induced insulin resistance with salicylates or targeted disruption of IKKb.
Science 2001,293,1673-1677
(213) Kim JK, Kim YJ, Fillmore JJ, Chen Y, Moore I, Lee J, Yuan M, Li ZW, Karin M, Perret P,
Shoelson SE, Shulman GI. Prevention of fat-induced insulin resistance by salicylate. J
Clin Invest 2001,108,437-446
(214) Hundal RS, Petersen KF, Mayerson AB, Randhawa PS, Inzucchi S, Shoelson SE,
Shulman GI. Mechanism by which high-dose aspirin improves glucose metabolism in type
2 diabetes. J Clin Invest 2002,109,1321-1326
(215) Gullo D, Evans JL, Sortino G, Goldfine ID, Vigneri R. Insulin autoimmune syndrome
(Hirata Disease) in European Caucasians taking alpha-lipoic acid. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
(216) Barbul A. Arginine: biochemistry, physiology, and therapeutic implications. J Parenter
Enteral Nutr 1986,10,227-238
(217) Moncada S, Higgs A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N Engl J Med 1993,329,2002-
(218) Fried R, Merrell WC. The Arginine Solution. 1 ed. New York: Warner Books; 1999.
(219) Palmer RM, Ashton DS, Moncada S. Vascular endothelial cells synthesize nitric oxide
from L-arginine. Nature 1988,333,664-666
(220) Kobzik L, Reid MB, Bredt DS, Stamler JS. Nitric oxide in skeletal muscle. Nature
(221) Reid MB. Role of nitric oxide in skeletal muscle: synthesis, distribution and functional
importance. Acta Physiol Scand 1998,162,401-409
(222) Luscher TF, Noll G. The pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease: role of the endothelium
as a target and mediator. Atherosclerosis 1995,118 (Suppl),S81-S90
(223) Zeiher AM, Drexler H, Saurbier B, Just H. Endothelium-mediated coronary blood flow
modulation in humans. Effects of age, atherosclerosis, hypercholesterolemia, and
hypertension. J Clin Invest 1993,92,652-662
(224) Tschudi MR, Barton M, Bersinger NA, Moreau P, Cosentino F, Noll G, Malinski T, Luscher
TF. Effect of age on kinetics of nitric oxide release in rat aorta and pulmonary artery. J
Clin Invest 1996,98,899-905
(225) Pieper GM. Review of alterations in endothelial nitric oxide production in diabetes:
protective role of arginine on endothelial dysfunction. Hypertension 1998,31,1047-1060
(226) Honing ML, Morrison PJ, Banga JD, Stroes ES, Rabelink TJ. Nitric oxide availability in
diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev 1998,14,241-249
(227) Gewaltig MT, Kojda G. Vasoprotection by nitric oxide: mechanisms and therapeutic
potential. Cardiovasc Res 2002,55,250-260
(228) Boger RH, Bode-Boger SM. The clinical pharmacology of L-arginine. Annu Rev
Pharmacol Toxicol 2001,41,79-99
(229) Cooke JP, Zimmer J. The Cardiovascular Cure. How to Strengthen Your Self-Defense
Against Heart Attack and Stroke. 1st ed. New York: Broadway; 2002.
(230) Preli RB, Klein KP, Herrington DM. Vascular effects of dietary L-arginine supplementation.
Atherosclerosis 2002,162,1-15
(231) Lekakis JP, Papathanassiou S, Papaioannou TG, Papamichael CM, Zakopoulos N, Kotsis
V, Dagre AG, Stamatelopoulos K, Protogerou A, Stamatelopoulos SF. Oral L-arginine
improves endothelial dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension. Int J Cardiol
(232) Maxwell AJ, Anderson B, Zapien MP, Cooke JP. Endothelial dysfunction in
hypercholesterolemia is reversed by a nutritional product designed to enhance nitric oxide
activity. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2000,14,309-316
(233) Clarkson P, Adams MR, Powe AJ, Donald AE, McCredie R, Robinson J, McCarthy SN,
Keech A, Celermajer DS, Deanfield JE. Oral L-arginine improves endothelium-dependent
dilation in hypercholesterolemic young adults. J Clin Invest 1996,97,1989-1994
(234) Adams MR, McCredie R, Jessup W, Robinson J, Sullivan D, Celermajer DS. Oral L-
arginine improves endothelium-dependent dilatation and reduces monocyte adhesion to
endothelial cells in young men with coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis
(235) Lerman A, Burnett JC, Jr., Higano ST, McKinley LJ, Holmes DR, Jr. Long-term L-arginine
supplementation improves small-vessel coronary endothelial function in humans.
Circulation 1998,97,2123-2128
(236) Huynh NT, Tayek JA. Oral arginine reduces systemic blood pressure in type 2 diabetes:
its potential role in nitric oxide generation. J Am Coll Nutr 2002,21,422-427
(237) Mehta S, Stewart DJ, Levy RD. The hypotensive effect of L-arginine is associated with
increased expired nitric oxide in humans. Chest 1996,109,1550-1555
(238) Facchinetti F, Longo M, Piccinini F, Neri I, Volpe A. L-arginine infusion reduces blood
pressure in preeclamptic women through nitric oxide release. J Soc Gynecol Investig
(239) Kelly BS, Alexander JW, Dreyer D, Greenberg NA, Erickson A, Whiting JF, Ogle CK,
Babcock GF, First MR. Oral arginine improves blood pressure in renal transplant and
hemodialysis patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2001,25,194-202
(240) Setoguchi S, Hirooka Y, Eshima K, Shimokawa H, Takeshita A. Tetrahydrobiopterin
improves impaired endothelium-dependent forearm vasodilation in patients with heart
failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2002,39,363-368
(241) Blum A, Hathaway L, Mincemoyer R, Schenke WH, Kirby M, Csako G, Waclawiw MA,
Panza JA, Cannon RO, III. Effects of oral L-arginine on endothelium-dependent
vasodilation and markers of inflammation in healthy postmenopausal women. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2000,35,271-276
(242) Blum A, Hathaway L, Mincemoyer R, Schenke WH, Kirby M, Csako G, Waclawiw MA,
Panza JA, Cannon RO, III. Oral L-arginine in patients with coronary artery disease on
medical management. Circulation 2000,101,2160-2164
(243) Monti LD, Setola E, Lucotti PC, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Comola M, Galluccio E, Poggi A,
Mammi S, Catapano AL, Comi G, Chiesa R, Bosi E, Piatti PM. Effect of a long-term oral l-
arginine supplementation on glucose metabolism: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-
controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2012,14,893-900
(244) Knekt P, Ritz J, Pereira MA, O'Reilly EJ, Augustsson K, Fraser GE, Goldbourt U,
Heitmann BL, Hallmans G, Liu S, Pietinen P, Spiegelman D, Stevens J, Virtamo J, Willett
WC, Rimm EB, Ascherio A. Antioxidant vitamins and coronary heart disease risk: a pooled
analysis of 9 cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr 2004,80,1508-1520
(245) Osganian SK, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Spiegelman D, Hu FB, Manson JE, Willett WC.
Vitamin C and risk of coronary heart disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003,42,246-
(246) Wannamethee SG, Lowe GD, Rumley A, Bruckdorfer KR, Whincup PH. Associations of
vitamin C status, fruit and vegetable intakes, and markers of inflammation and
hemostasis. Am J Clin Nutr 2006,83,567-574
(247) Boekholdt SM, Meuwese MC, Day NE, Luben R, Welch A, Wareham NJ, Khaw KT.
Plasma concentrations of ascorbic acid and C-reactive protein, and risk of future coronary
artery disease, in apparently healthy men and women: the EPIC-Norfolk prospective
population study. Br J Nutr 2006,96,516-522
(248) Levine GN, Keaney JF, Jr., Vita JA. Cholesterol reduction in cardiovascular disease.
Clinical benefits and possible mechanisms. N Engl J Med 1995,332,512-521
(249) Cai H, Harrison DG. Endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular diseases: the role of
oxidant stress. Circ Res 2000,87,840-844
(250) Laight DW, Carrier MJ, Anggard EE. Antioxidants, diabetes and endothelial dysfunction.
Cardiovasc Res 2000,47,457-464
(251) Baron AD, Quon MJ. Insulin action and endothelial function. In: Reaven GM, Laws A, eds.
Insulin Resistance: The Metabolic Syndrome X. Totowa: Humana Press; 1999:247-263.
(252) Calles-Escandon J, Cipolla M. Diabetes and endothelial dysfunction: a clinical
perspective. Endocr Rev 2001,22,36-52
(253) Perticone F, Ceravolo R, Candigliota M, Ventura G, Iacopino S, Sinopoli F, Mattioli PL.
Obesity and body fat distribution induce endothelial dysfunction by oxidative stress:
protective effect of vitamin C. Diabetes 2001,50,159-165
(254) Timimi FK, Ting HH, Haley EA, Roddy MA, Ganz P, Creager MA. Vitamin C improves
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1998,31,552-557
(255) Ting HH, Timimi FK, Boles KS, Creager SJ, Ganz P, Creager MA. Vitamin C improves
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. J Clin Invest 1996,97,22-28
(256) Lekakis JP, Anastasiou EA, Papamichael CM, Stamatelopoulos KS, Dagre AG, Alevizaki
MC, Stamatelopoulos SF. Short-term oral ascorbic acid improves endothelium-dependent
vasodilatation in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care
(257) Levine GN, Frei B, Koulouris SN, Gerhard MD, Keaney JF, Jr., Vita JA. Ascorbic acid
reverses endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease.
Circulation 1996,93,1107-1113
(258) Gokce N, Keaney JF, Jr., Frei B, Holbrook M, Olesiak M, Zachariah BJ, Leeuwenburgh C,
Heinecke JW, Vita JA. Long-term ascorbic acid administration reverses endothelial
vasomotor dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation 1999,99,3234-
(259) Hirai N, Kawano H, Hirashima O, Motoyama T, Moriyama Y, Sakamoto T, Kugiyama K,
Ogawa H, Nakao K, Yasue H. Insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction in smokers:
effects of vitamin C. Am J Physiol 2000,279,H1172-H1178
(260) Hirashima O, Kawano H, Motoyama T, Hirai N, Ohgushi M, Kugiyama K, Ogawa H, Yasue
H. Improvement of endothelial function and insulin sensitivity with vitamin C in patients
with coronary spastic angina: possible role of reactive oxygen species. J Am Coll Cardiol
(261) Antoniades C, Tousoulis D, Tountas C, Tentolouris C, Toutouza M, Vasiliadou C, Tsioufis
C, Toutouzas P, Stefanadis C. Vascular endothelium and inflammatory process, in
patients with combined Type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary atherosclerosis: the effects
of vitamin C. Diabet Med 2004,21,552-558
(262) Anderson RA, Evans LM, Ellis GR, Khan N, Morris K, Jackson SK, Rees A, Lewis MJ,
Frenneaux MP. Prolonged deterioration of endothelial dysfunction in response to
postprandial lipaemia is attenuated by vitamin C in Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med
(263) Chen H, Karne RJ, Hall G, Campia U, Panza JA, Cannon RO, III, Wang Y, Katz A, Levine
M, Quon MJ. High-dose oral vitamin C partially replenishes vitamin C levels in patients
with Type 2 diabetes and low vitamin C levels but does not improve endothelial
dysfunction or insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2006,290,H137-H145
(264) Song Y, Cook NR, Albert CM, Van DM, Manson JE. Effects of vitamins C and E and beta-
carotene on the risk of type 2 diabetes in women at high risk of cardiovascular disease: a
randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2009,90,429-437
(265) Harding AH, Wareham NJ, Bingham SA, Khaw K, Luben R, Welch A, Forouhi NG. Plasma
vitamin C level, fruit and vegetable consumption, and the risk of new-onset type 2
diabetes mellitus: the European prospective investigation of cancer--Norfolk prospective
study. Arch Intern Med 2008,168,1493-1499
(266) Bonakdar RA, Guarneri E. Coenzyme Q10. Am Fam Physician 2005,72,1065-1070
(267) Singh RB, Niaz MA, Rastogi SS, Shukla PK, Thakur AS. Effect of hydrosoluble coenzyme
Q10 on blood pressure and insullin resistance in hypertensive patients with coronary
heart disease. J Hum Hypertens 1999,13,203-208
(268) Ghirlanda G, Oradei A, Manto A, Lippa S, Uccioli L, Caputo S, Greco AV, Littarru GP.
Evidence of plasma CoQ10-lowering effect by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: a double-
blind, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Pharmacol 1993,33,226-229
(269) Colquhoun DM, Jackson R, Walters M, Hicks BJ, Goldsmith J, Young P, Strakosch C,
Kostner KM. Effects of simvastatin on blood lipids, vitamin E, coenzyme Q10 levels and
left ventricular function in humans. Eur J Clin Invest 2005,35,251-258
(270) Pyorala K, Laakso M, Uusitupa M. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: an epidemiologic view.
Diabetes Metab Rev 1987,3,463-524
(271) Paolisso G, Esposito R, D'Alessio MA, Barbieri M. Primary and secondary prevention of
atherosclerosis: is there a role for antioxidants? Diabetes Metab 1999,25,298-306
(272) Devaraj S, Jialal I. Antioxidants and vitamins to reduce cardiovascular disease. Curr
Atheroscler Rep 2000,2,342-351
(273) Jialal I, Traber M, Devaraj S. Is there a vitamin E paradox? Curr Opin Lipidol 2001,12,49-
(274) Yusuf S, Dagenais G, Pogue J, Bosch J, Sleight P. Vitamin E supplementation and
cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation
Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000,342,154-160
(275) Devaraj S, Jialal I. Low-density lipoprotein postsecretory modification, monocyte function,
and circulating adhesion molecules in type 2 diabetic patients with and without
macrovascular complications: the effect of alpha-tocopherol supplementation. Circulation
(276) Bursell SE, Clermont AC, Aiello LP, Aiello LM, Schlossman DK, Feener EP, Laffel L, King
GL. High-dose vitamin E supplementation normalizes retinal blood flow and creatinine
clearance in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999,22,1245-1251
(277) Gaede P, Poulsen HE, Parving HH, Pedersen O. Double-blind, randomised study of the
effect of combined treatment with vitamin C and E on albuminuria in Type 2 diabetic
patients. Diabet Med 2001,18,756-760
(278) Manzella D, Barbieri M, Ragno E, Paolisso G. Chronic administration of pharmacologic
doses of vitamin E improves the cardiac autonomic nervous system in patients with type 2
diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2001,73,1052-1057
(279) Caballero B. Vitamin E improves the action of insulin. Nutr Rev 1993,51,339-340
(280) Paolisso G, D'Amore A, Galzerano D, Balbi V, Giugliano D, Varricchio M, D'Onofrio F.
Daily vitamin E supplements improve metabolic control but not insulin secretion in elderly
type II diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1993,16,1433-1437
(281) Ferrannini E, Mari A. How to measure insulin sensitivity. J Hypertension 1998,6,895-906
(282) Paolisso G, D'Amore A, Giugliano D, Ceriello A, Varricchio M, D'Onofrio F.
Pharmacological doses of vitamin E improve insulin action in healthy subjects and non-
insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1993,57,650-656
(283) Paolisso G, Di Maro G, Galzerano D, Cacciapuoti F, Varricchio G, Varricchio M, D'Onofrio
F. Pharmacological doses of vitamin E and insulin action in elderly subjects. Am J Clin
Nutr 1994,59,1291-1296
(284) Barbagallo M, Dominguez LJ, Tagliamonte MR, Resnick LM, Paolisso G. Effects of
vitamin E and glutathione on glucose metabolism: role of magnesium. Hypertension
(285) Sacco M, Pellegrini F, Roncaglioni MC, Avanzini F, Tognoni G, Nicolucci A. Primary
prevention of cardiovascular events with low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in type 2 diabetic
patients: results of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP) trial. Diabetes Care
(286) Czernichow S, Couthouis A, Bertrais S, Vergnaud AC, Dauchet L, Galan P, Hercberg S.
Antioxidant supplementation does not affect fasting plasma glucose in the
Supplementation with Antioxidant Vitamins and Minerals (SU.VI.MAX) study in France:
association with dietary intake and plasma concentrations. Am J Clin Nutr 2006,84,395-
(287) Economides PA, Khaodhiar L, Caselli A, Caballero AE, Keenan H, Bursell SE, King GL,
Johnstone MT, Horton ES, Veves A. The effect of vitamin E on endothelial function of
micro- and macrocirculation and left ventricular function in type 1 and type 2 diabetic
patients. Diabetes 2005,54,204-211
(288) McSorley PT, Bell PM, Young IS, Atkinson AB, Sheridan B, Fee JP, Mccance DR.
Endothelial function, insulin action and cardiovascular risk factors in young healthy adult
offspring of parents with Type 2 diabetes: effect of vitamin E in a randomized double-
blind, controlled clinical trial. Diabet Med 2005,22,703-710
(289) Myung SK, Ju W, Cho B, Oh SW, Park SM, Koo BK, Park BJ. Efficacy of vitamin and
antioxidant supplements in prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2013,346,f10
(290) Montero D, Walther G, Stehouwer CD, Houben AJ, Beckman JA, Vinet A. Effect of
antioxidant vitamin supplementation on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 2013,
(291) Suksomboon N, Poolsup N, Sinprasert S. Effects of vitamin E supplementation on
glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J
Clin Pharm Ther 2011,36,53-63
(292) Vardi M, Blum S, Levy AP. Haptoglobin genotype and cardiovascular outcomes in
diabetes mellitus - natural history of the disease and the effect of vitamin E treatment.
Meta-analysis of the medical literature. Eur J Intern Med 2012,23,628-632
(293) Vardi M, Levy NS, Levy AP. Vitamin E in the prevention of cardiovascular disease: the
importance of proper patient selection. J Lipid Res 2013,54,2307-2314
(294) Guyton JR. Effect of niacin on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol
(295) Grundy SM, Vega GL, McGovern ME, Tulloch BR, Kendall DM, Fitz-Patrick D, Ganda OP,
Rosenson RS, Buse JB, Robertson DD, Sheehan JP. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of
once-daily niacin for the treatment of dyslipidemia associated with type 2 diabetes: results
of the assessment of diabetes control and evaluation of the efficacy of niaspan trial. Arch
Intern Med 2002,162,1568-1576
(296) Boden WE, Probstfield JL, Anderson T, Chaitman BR, Desvignes-Nickens P, Koprowicz K,
McBride R, Teo K, Weintraub W. Niacin in patients with low HDL cholesterol levels
receiving intensive statin therapy. N Engl J Med 2011,365,2255-2267
(297) Creider JC, Hegele RA, Joy TR. Niacin: another look at an underutilized lipid-lowering
medication. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012,8,517-528
(298) Wanders D, Plaisance EP, Judd RL. Pharmacological effects of lipid-lowering drugs on
circulating adipokines. World J Diabetes 2010,1,116-128
(299) Lee B, Shao J. Adiponectin and energy homeostasis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2013,
(300) Lavigne PM, Karas RH. The current state of niacin in cardiovascular disease prevention:
a systematic review and meta-regression. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013,61,440-446
(301) Gouni-Berthold I, Berthold HK. The role of niacin in lipid-lowering treatment: are we
aiming too high? Curr Pharm Des 2013,19,3094-3106
(302) Belleville J. The French paradox: possible involvement of ethanol in the protective effect
against cardiovascular diseases. Nutrition 2002,18,173-177
(303) Opie LH, Lecour S. The red wine hypothesis: from concepts to protective signalling
molecules. Eur Heart J 2007,28,1683-1693
(304) Providencia R. Cardiovascular protection from alcoholic drinks: scientific basis of the
French Paradox. Rev Port Cardiol 2006,25,1043-1058
(305) Baur JA, Sinclair DA. Therapeutic potential of resveratrol: the in vivo evidence. Nat Rev
Drug Discov 2006,5,493-506
(306) Jang M, Cai L, Udeani GO, Slowing KV, Thomas CF, Beecher CW, Fong HH, Farnsworth
NR, Kinghorn AD, Mehta RG, Moon RC, Pezzuto JM. Cancer chemopreventive activity of
resveratrol, a natural product derived from grapes. Science 1997,275,218-220
(307) Harikumar KB, Aggarwal BB. Resveratrol: A multitargeted agent for age-associated
chronic diseases. Cell Cycle 2008,7,1-18
(308) Orallo F. Trans-resveratrol: a magical elixir of eternal youth? Curr Med Chem
(309) Bass TM, Weinkove D, Houthoofd K, Gems D, Partridge L. Effects of resveratrol on
lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans. Mech Ageing Dev
(310) Barger JL, Kayo T, Vann JM, Arias EB, Wang J, Hacker TA, Wang Y, Raederstorff D,
Morrow JD, Leeuwenburgh C, Allison DB, Saupe KW, Cartee GD, Weindruch R, Prolla
TA. A low dose of dietary resveratrol partially mimics caloric restriction and retards aging
parameters in mice. PLoS ONE 2008,3,e2264 (1)-e2264 (10)
(311) Pearson KJ, Baur JA, Lewis KN, Peshkin L, Price NL, Labinskyy N, Swindell WR, Kamara
D, Minor RK, Perez E, Jamieson HA, Zhang Y, Dunn SR, Sharma K, Pleshko N, Woollett
LA, Csiszar A, Ikeno Y, Le CD, Elliott PJ, Becker KG, Navas P, Ingram DK, Wolf NS,
Ungvari Z, Sinclair DA, de CR. Resveratrol delays age-related deterioration and mimics
transcriptional aspects of dietary restriction without extending life span. Cell Metab
(312) Lagouge M, Argmann C, Gerhart-Hines Z, Meziane H, Lerin C, Daussin F, Messadeq N,
Milne J, Lambert P, Elliott P, Geny B, Laakso M, Puigserver P, Auwerx J. Resveratrol
improves mitochondrial function and protects against metabolic disease by activating
SIRT1 and PGC-1alpha. Cell 2006,127,1109-1122
(313) Milne JC, Lambert PD, Schenk S, Carney DP, Smith JJ, Gagne DJ, Jin L, Boss O, Perni
RB, Vu CB, Bemis JE, Xie R, Disch JS, Ng PY, Nunes JJ, Lynch AV, Yang H, Galonek H,
Israelian K, Choy W, Iffland A, Lavu S, Medvedik O, Sinclair DA, Olefsky JM, Jirousek
MR, Elliott PJ, Westphal CH. Small molecule activators of SIRT1 as therapeutics for the
treatment of type 2 diabetes. Nature 2007,450,712-716
(314) Sakamoto K. Silencing metabolic disorders by novel SIRT1 activators. Cell Metab
(315) Pirola L, Frojdo S. Resveratrol: one molecule, many targets. IUBMB Life 2008,60,323-332
(316) Zabolotny JM, Kim YB. Silencing insulin resistance through SIRT1. Cell Metab
(317) Sun C, Zhang F, Ge X, Yan T, Chen X, Shi X, Zhai Q. SIRT1 improves insulin sensitivity
under insulin-resistant conditions by repressing PTP1B. Cell Metab 2007,6,307-319
(318) Dash S, Xiao C, Morgantini C, Szeto L, Lewis GF. High-dose resveratrol treatment for 2
weeks inhibits intestinal and hepatic lipoprotein production in overweight/obese men.
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2013,33,2895-2901
(319) Poulsen MM, Vestergaard PF, Clasen BF, Radko Y, Christensen LP, Stodkilde-Jorgensen
H, Moller N, Jessen N, Pedersen SB, Jorgensen JO. High-dose resveratrol
supplementation in obese men: an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled
clinical trial of substrate metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and body composition. Diabetes
(320) Timmers S, Konings E, Bilet L, Houtkooper RH, van de Weijer T, Goossens GH, Hoeks J,
van der Krieken S, Ryu D, Kersten S, Moonen-Kornips E, Hesselink MK, Kunz I,
Schrauwen-Hinderling VB, Blaak EE, Auwerx J, Schrauwen P. Calorie restriction-like
effects of 30 days of resveratrol supplementation on energy metabolism and metabolic
profile in obese humans. Cell Metab 2011,14,612-622
(321) Wong RH, Howe PR, Buckley JD, Coates AM, Kunz I, Berry NM. Acute resveratrol
supplementation improves flow-mediated dilatation in overweight/obese individuals with
mildly elevated blood pressure. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2011,21,851-856
(322) De GD, Van BK, Deviere J, Van BW, Mukaneza A, Amininejad L. Effect of the intake of
resveratrol, resveratrol phosphate, and catechin-rich grape seed extract on markers of
oxidative stress and gene expression in adult obese subjects. Ann Nutr Metab
(323) Crandall JP, Oram V, Trandafirescu G, Reid M, Kishore P, Hawkins M, Cohen HW,
Barzilai N. Pilot study of resveratrol in older adults with impaired glucose tolerance. J
Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2012,67,1307-1312
(324) Bhatt JK, Thomas S, Nanjan MJ. Resveratrol supplementation improves glycemic control
in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutr Res 2012,32,537-541
(325) Brasnyo P, Molnar GA, Mohas M, Marko L, Laczy B, Cseh J, Mikolas E, Szijarto IA, Merei
A, Halmai R, Meszaros LG, Sumegi B, Wittmann I. Resveratrol improves insulin
sensitivity, reduces oxidative stress and activates the Akt pathway in type 2 diabetic
patients. Br J Nutr 2011,106,383-389
(326) Tome-Carneiro J, Larrosa M, Yanez-Gascon MJ, Davalos A, Gil-Zamorano J, Gonzalvez
M, Garcia-Almagro FJ, Ruiz Ros JA, Tomas-Barberan FA, Espin JC, Garcia-Conesa MT.
One-year supplementation with a grape extract containing resveratrol modulates
inflammatory-related microRNAs and cytokines expression in peripheral blood
mononuclear cells of type 2 diabetes and hypertensive patients with coronary artery
disease. Pharmacol Res 2013,72,69-82
(327) Tome-Carneiro J, Gonzalvez M, Larrosa M, Yanez-Gascon MJ, Garcia-Almagro FJ, Ruiz-
Ros JA, Tomas-Barberan FA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Espin JC. Grape resveratrol increases
serum adiponectin and downregulates inflammatory genes in peripheral blood
mononuclear cells: a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, one-year clinical trial in patients with
stable coronary artery disease. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2013,27,37-48
(328) Militaru C, Donoiu I, Craciun A, Scorei ID, Bulearca AM, Scorei RI. Oral resveratrol and
calcium fructoborate supplementation in subjects with stable angina pectoris: effects on
lipid profiles, inflammation markers, and quality of life. Nutrition 2013,29,178-183
(329) Zamora-Ros R, Urpi-Sarda M, Lamuela-Raventos RM, Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Salas-
Salvado J, Aros F, Fito M, Lapetra J, Estruch R, Andres-Lacueva C. High urinary levels of
resveratrol metabolites are associated with a reduction in the prevalence of
cardiovascular risk factors in high-risk patients. Pharmacol Res 2012,65,615-620
(330) Agarwal B, Campen MJ, Channell MM, Wherry SJ, Varamini B, Davis JG, Baur JA,
Smoliga JM. Resveratrol for primary prevention of atherosclerosis: clinical trial evidence
for improved gene expression in vascular endothelium. Int J Cardiol 2013,166,246-248
(331) Tome-Carneiro J, Gonzalvez M, Larrosa M, Yanez-Gascon MJ, Garcia-Almagro FJ, Ruiz-
Ros JA, Tomas-Barberan FA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Espin JC. Resveratrol in primary and
secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a dietary and clinical perspective. Ann N
Y Acad Sci 2013,1290,37-51
(332) Tome-Carneiro J, Gonzalvez M, Larrosa M, Yanez-Gascon MJ, Garcia-Almagro FJ, Ruiz-
Ros JA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Tomas-Barberan FA, Espin JC. One-year consumption of a
grape nutraceutical containing resveratrol improves the inflammatory and fibrinolytic
status of patients in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Cardiol
(333) Tome-Carneiro J, Gonzalvez M, Larrosa M, Garcia-Almagro FJ, Aviles-Plaza F, Parra S,
Yanez-Gascon MJ, Ruiz-Ros JA, Garcia-Conesa MT, Tomas-Barberan FA, Espin JC.
Consumption of a grape extract supplement containing resveratrol decreases oxidized
LDL and ApoB in patients undergoing primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a
triple-blind, 6-month follow-up, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Mol Nutr Food Res
(334) Fujitaka K, Otani H, Jo F, Jo H, Nomura E, Iwasaki M, Nishikawa M, Iwasaka T, Das DK.
Modified resveratrol Longevinex improves endothelial function in adults with metabolic
syndrome receiving standard treatment. Nutr Res 2011,31,842-847
(335) Popat R, Plesner T, Davies F, Cook G, Cook M, Elliott P, Jacobson E, Gumbleton T,
Oakervee H, Cavenagh J. A phase 2 study of SRT501 (resveratrol) with bortezomib for
patients with relapsed and or refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol 2013,160,714-
(336) Mccarty MF. Exploiting complementary therapeutic strategies for the treatment of type II
diabetes and prevention of its complications. Med Hypotheses 1997,49,143-152
(337) Mertz W. Chromium research from a distance: from 1959 to 1980. J Am Coll Nutr
(338) Morris BW, Kouta S, Robinson R, MacNeil S, Heller S. Chromium supplementation
improves insulin resistance in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med
(339) Jeejeebhoy KN, Chu RC, Marliss EB, Greenberg GR, Bruce-Robertson A. Chromium
deficiency, glucose intolerance, and neuropathy reversed by chromium supplementation,
in a patient receiving long-term total parenteral nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 1977,30,531-538
(340) Mooradian AD, Failla M, Hoogwerf B, Maryniuk M, Wylie-Rosett J. Selected vitamins and
minerals in diabetes. Diabetes Care 1994,17,464-479
(341) Trumbo PR, Ellwood KC. Chromium picolinate intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: an
evidence-based review by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Nutr Rev
(342) Kleefstra N, Houweling ST, Jansman FG, Groenier KH, Gans RO, Meyboom-de JB,
Bakker SJ, Bilo HJ. Chromium treatment has no effect in patients with poorly controlled,
insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in an obese Western population: a randomized, double-
blind, placebo-controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2006,29,521-525
(343) Martin J, Wang ZQ, Zhang XH, Wachtel D, Volaufova J, Matthews DE, Cefalu WT.
Chromium picolinate supplementation attenuates body weight gain and increases insulin
sensitivity in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006,29,1826-1832
(344) Racek J, Trefil L, Rajdl D, Mudrova V, Hunter D, Senft V. Influence of chromium-enriched
yeast on blood glucose and insulin variables, blood lipids, and markers of oxidative stress
in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Biol Trace Elem Res 2006,109,215-230
(345) Anderson RA. Chromium in the prevention and control of diabetes. Diabetes Metab
(346) Lukaski HC. Chromium as a supplement. Annu Rev Nutr 1999,19,279-302
(347) Lamson DW, Plaza SM. The safety and efficacy of high-dose chromium. Altern Med Rev
(348) Althuis MD, Jordan NE, Ludington EA, Wittes JT. Glucose and insulin responses to
dietary chromium supplements: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2002,76,148-155
(349) Anderson RA, Cheng N, Bryden NA, Polansky MM, Chi J, Feng J. Elevated intakes of
supplemental chromium improve glucose and insulin variables in individuals with type 2
diabetes. Diabetes 1997,46,1786-1791
(350) Uusitupa MI, Mykkanen L, Siitonen O, Laakso M, Sarlund H, Kolehmainen P, Rasanen T,
Kumpulainen J, Pyorala K. Chromium supplementation in impaired glucose tolerance of
elderly: effects on blood glucose, plasma insulin, C-peptide and lipid levels. Br J Nutr
(351) Grant KE, Chandler RM, Castle AL, Ivy JL. Chromium and exercise training: effect on
obese women. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1997,29,992-998
(352) Cefalu WT, Hu FB. Role of chromium in human health and in diabetes. Diabetes Care
(353) Juturu V, Komorowski JR. Chromium supplements, glucose, and insulin responses. Am J
Clin Nutr 2003,78,190-193
(354) Anderson RA, Polansky MM, Bryden NA. Stability and absorption of chromium and
absorption of chromium histidinate complexes by humans. Biol Trace Elem Res
(355) DiSilvestro RA, Dy E. Acute absorption comparison of commercially available chromium
supplements and one new supplement. Biol Trace Elem Res. In press.
(356) Wang ZQ, Zhang XH, Russell JC, Hulver M, Cefalu WT. Chromium picolinate enhances
skeletal muscle cellular insulin signaling in vivo in obese, insulin-resistant JCR:LA-cp rats.
J Nutr 2006,136,415-420
(357) Byon JCH, Kusari AB, Kusari J. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1B acts as a negative
regulator of insulin signal transduction. Mol Cell Biochem 1998,182,101-108
(358) Elchebly M, Payette P, Michaliszyn E, Cromlish W, Collins S, Loy AL, Normandin D,
Cheng A, Himmshagen J, Chan CC, Ramachandran C, Gresser MJ, Tremblay ML,
Kennedy BP. Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the
protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. Science 1999,283,1544-1548
(359) Klaman LD, Boss O, Peroni OD, Kim JK, Martino JL, Zabolotny JM, Moghal N, Lubkin M,
Kim YB, Sharpe AH, Stricker-Krongrad A, Shulman GI, Neel BG, Kahn BB. Increased
energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-
tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol 2000,20,5479-5489
(360) Goldstein BJ. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B): a novel therapeutic target for
type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and related states of insulin resistance. Curr Drug
Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 2001,1,265-275
(361) Ramachandran C, Kennedy BP. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B: a novel target for type
2 diabetes and obesity. Curr Top Med Chem 2003,3,749-757
(362) Malamas MS, Sredy J, Gunawan I, Mihan B, Sawicki DR, Seestaller L, Sullivan D, Flam
BR. New azolidinediones as inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B with
antihyperglycemic properties. J Med Chem 2000,43,995-1010
(363) Cheon HG, Kim SM, Yang SD, Ha JD, Choi JK. Discovery of a novel protein tyrosine
phosphatase-1B inhibitor, KR61639: potential development as an antihyperglycemic
agent. Eur J Pharmacol 2004,485,333-339
(364) Liu G, Szczepankiewicz BG, Pei Z, Janowick DA, Xin Z, Hajduk PJ, bad-Zapatero C,
Liang H, Hutchins CW, Fesik SW, Ballaron SJ, Stashko MA, Lubben T, Mika AK, Zinker
BA, Trevillyan JM, Jirousek MR. Discovery and structure-activity relationship of
oxalylarylaminobenzoic acids as inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B. J Med
Chem 2003,46,2093-2103
(365) Wang H, Kruszewski A, Brautigan DL. Cellular chromium enhances activation of insulin
receptor kinase. Biochemistry 2005,44,8167-8175
(366) Pender C, Youngren JF, Manchem VP, Evans JL, Spevak WR, Shi S, Rao S, Bajjalieh S,
Maddux BA, Goldfine ID. Regulation of insulin receptor function by a small molecule
insulin receptor activator. J Biol Chem 2002,277,43565-43571
(367) Li M, Youngren JF, Dunaif A, Goldfine ID, Maddux BA, Zhang BB, Evans JL. Decreased
insulin receptor (IR) autophosphorylation in fibroblasts from patients with PCOS: effects of
sering kinase inhibitors and IR activators. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002,87,4088-4093
(368) Laires MJ, Monteiro CP, Bicho M. Role of cellular magnesium in health and human
disease. Front Biosci 2004,9,262-276
(369) Anonymous. PDR for nutritional supplements. 1st ed ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical
Economics Co; 2001.
(370) Yokota K. Diabetes mellitus and magnesium. Clin Calcium 2005,15,203-212
(371) Takaya J, Higashino H, Kobayashi Y. Intracellular magnesium and insulin resistance.
Magnes Res 2004,17,126-136
(372) Barbagallo M, Dominguez LJ, Galioto A, Ferlisi A, Cani C, Malfa L, Pineo A, Busardo' A,
Paolisso G. Role of magnesium in insulin action, diabetes and cardio-metabolic syndrome
X. Mol Aspects Med 2003,24,39-52
(373) Tosiello L. Hypomagnesemia and diabetes mellitus: A review of clinical implications. Arch
Intern Med 1996,156,1143-1148
(374) Chakraborti S, Chakraborti T, Mandal M, Mandal A, Das S, Ghosh S. Protective role of
magnesium in cardiovascular diseases: a review. Mol Cell Biochem 2002,238,163-179
(375) Paolisso G, Barbagallo M. Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and insulin resistance: the
role of intracellular magnesium. Am J Hypertens 1997,10,346-355
(376) Fox C, Ramsoomair D, Carter C. Magnesium: its proven and potential clinical
significance. South Med J 2001,94,1195-1201
(377) Lopez-Ridaura R, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Liu S, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Hu FB.
Magnesium intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in men and women. Diabetes Care
(378) Murakami K, Okubo H, Sasaki S. Effect of dietary factors on incidence of type 2 diabetes:
a systematic review of cohort studies. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2005,51,292-310
(379) Song Y, Manson JE, Buring JE, Liu S. Dietary magnesium intake in relation to plasma
insulin levels and risk of type 2 diabetes in women. Diabetes Care 2004,27,59-65
(380) Ma B, Lawson AB, Liese AD, Bell RA, Mayer-Davis EJ. Dairy, magnesium, and calcium
intake in relation to insulin sensitivity: approaches to modeling a dose-dependent
association. Am J Epidemiol 2006,164,449-458
(381) Nadler JL, Buchanan T, Natarajan R, Antonipillai I, Bergman RN, Rude R. Magnesium
deficiency produces insulin resistance and increased thromboxane synthesis.
Hypertension 1993,21,1024-1029
(382) de Valk HW. Magnesium in diabetes mellitus. Neth J Med 1999,54,139-146
(383) Huerta MG, Roemmich JN, Kington ML, Bovbjerg VE, Weltman AL, Holmes VF, Patrie JT,
Rogol AD, Nadler JL. Magnesium deficiency is associated with insulin resistance in obese
children. Diabetes Care 2005,28,1175-1181
(384) Sjogren A, Floren CH, Nilsson A. Oral administration of magnesium hydroxide to subjects
with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: effects on magnesium and potassium levels and
on insulin requirements. Magnesium 1988,7,117-122
(385) Paolisso G, Sgambato S, Pizza G, Passariello N, Varricchio M, D'Onofrio F. Improved
insulin response and action by chronic magnesium administration in aged NIDDM
subjects. Diabetes Care 1989,12,265-269
(386) Paolisso G, Passariello N, Pizza G, Marrazzo G, Giunta R, Sgambato S, Varricchio M,
D'Onofrio F. Dietary magnesium supplements improve b-cell response to glucose and
arginine in elderly non-insulin dependent diabetic subjects. Acta Endocrinol 1989,121,16-
(387) Rodriguez-Moran M, Guerrero-Romero F. Oral magnesium supplementation improves
insulin sensitivity and metabolic control in type 2 diabetic subjects: a randomized double-
blind controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2003,26,1147-1152
(388) Yokota K, Kato M, Lister F, Ii H, Hayakawa T, Kikuta T, Kageyama S, Tajima N. Clinical
efficacy of magnesium supplementation in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Am Coll Nutr
(389) Faure P, Roussel A, Coudray C, Richard MJ, Halimi S, Favier A. Zinc and insulin
sensitivity. Biol Trace Elem Res 1992,32,305-310
(390) Arquilla ER, Packer S, Tarmas W, Miyamoto S. The effect of zinc on insulin metabolism.
Endocrinology 1978,103,1440-1449
(391) Haase H, Maret W. Protein tyrosine phosphatases as targets of the combined
insulinomimetic effects of zinc and oxidants. Biometals 2005,18,333-338
(392) Salgueiro MJ, Krebs N, Zubillaga MB, Weill R, Postaire E, Lysionek AE, Caro RA, De
Paoli T, Hager A, Boccio J. Zinc and diabetes mellitus: is there a need of zinc
supplementation in diabetes mellitus patients? Biol Trace Elem Res 2001,81,215-228
(393) DiSilvestro RA. Zinc in relation to diabetes and oxidative disease. J Nutr 2000,130 (5S
(394) Zelko IN, Mariani TJ, Folz RJ. Superoxide dismutase multigene family: a comparison of
the CuZn-SOD (SOD1), Mn-SOD (SOD2), and EC-SOD (SOD3) gene structures,
evolution, and expression. Free Radic Biol Med 2002,33,337-349
(395) Al-Maroof RA, Al-Sharbatti SS. Serum zinc levels in diabetic patients and effect of zinc
supplementation on glycemic control of type 2 diabetics. Saudi Med J 2006,27,344-350
(396) Farvid MS, Jalali M, Siassi F, Hosseini M. Comparison of the effects of vitamins and/or
mineral supplementation on glomerular and tubular dysfunction in type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care 2005,28,2458-2464
(397) Farvid MS, Siassi F, Jalali M, Hosseini M, Saadat N. The impact of vitamin and/or mineral
supplementation on lipid profiles in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004,65,21-
(398) Anonymous. Vanadium. In: Hendler SS, Rorvik D, Fleming T, Deutsch M, Wyble C, eds.
PDR for nutritional supplements. 1st ed ed. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co;
(399) Mehdi MZ, Pandey SK, Theberge JF, Srivastava AK. Insulin signal mimicry as a
mechanism for the insulin-like effects of vanadium. Cell Biochem Biophys 2006,44,73-81
(400) Srivastava AK, Mehdi MZ. Insulino-mimetic and anti-diabetic effects of vanadium
compounds. Diabet Med 2005,22,2-13
(401) Posner BI, Faure R, Burgess JW, Bevan AP, Lachance D, Zhang-Sun G, Fantus IG, Ng
JB, Hall DA, Lum BS, et al. Peroxovanadium compounds. A new class of potent
phosphotyrosine phosphatase inhibitors which are insulin mimetics. J Biol Chem
(402) Elberg G, He ZB, Li JP, Sekar N, Shechter Y. Vanadate activates membranous
nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase in rat adipocytes. Diabetes 1997,46,1684-1690
(403) Tsiani E, Fantus IG. Vanadium compounds. Biological actions and potential as
pharmacological agents. Trends Endocrin Metabol 1997,8,51-58
(404) Sekar N, Li JP, Shechter Y. Vanadium salts as insulin substitutes: Mechanisms of action,
a scientific and therapeutic tool in diabetes mellitus research. Crit Rev Biochem Molec
Biol 1996,31,339-359
(405) Heyliger CE, Tahiliani AG, McNeill JH. Effect of vanadate on elevated blood glucose and
depressed cardiac performance of diabetic rats. Science 1985,227,1474-1477
(406) Yale JF, Lachance D, Bevan AP, Vigeant C, Shaver A, Posner BI. Hypoglycemic effects of
peroxovanadium compoundsin Sprague-Dawley and diabetic BB rats. Diabetes
(407) Yao J, Battell ML, McNeill JH. Acute and chronic response to vanadium following two
methods of streptozotocin-diabetes induction. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1997,75,83-90
(408) Meyerovitch J, Rothenberg P, Shechter Y, Bonner-Weir S, Kahn CR. Vanadate normalizes
hyperglycemia in two mouse models of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin
Invest 1991,87,1286-1294
(409) Verma S, Cam MC, McNeill JH. Nutritional factors that that favorably influence the
glucose/insulin system: Vanadium. J Am Coll Nutr 1998,17,11-18
(410) Goldfine AB, Simonson DC, Folli F, Patti E, Kahn CR. In vivo and in vitro studies of
vanadate in human and rodent diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Biochem 1995,153,217-231
(411) Goldfine AB, Simonson DC, Folli F, Patti ME, Kahn CR. Metabolic effects of sodium
metavanadate in humans with insulin-dependent and noninsulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus in vivo and in vitro studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995,80,3311-3320
(412) Halberstam M, Cohen N, Shlimovich P, Rossetti L, Shamoon H. Oral vanadyl sulfate
improves insulin sensitivity in NIDDM but not in obese nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes
(413) Cohen N, Halberstam M, Shlimovich P, Chang CJ, Shamoon H, Rossetti L. Oral vanadyl
sulfate improves hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity in patients with non-insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 1995,95,2501-2509
(414) Boden G, Chen XH, Ruiz J, Vanrossum GDV, Turco S. Effects of vanadyl sulfate on
carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus. Metabolism 1996,45,1130-1135
(415) Cusi K, Cukier S, DeFronzo RA, Torres M, Puchulu FM, Redondo JC. Vanadyl sulfate
improves hepatic and muscle insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2001,86,1410-1417
(416) Thompson KH, Orvig C. Vanadium compounds in the treatment of diabetes. Met Ions Biol
Syst 2004,41,221-252
(417) Kofuji K, Qian CJ, Murata Y, Kawashima S. The controlled release of insulin-mimetic
metal ions by the multifunction of chitosan. J Inorg Biochem 2005,99,1329-1334
(418) Badmaev V, Prakash S, Majeed M. Vanadium: a review of its potential role in the fight
against diabetes. J Altern Complement Med 1999,5,273-291
(419) Hasenknopf B. Polyoxometalates: introduction to a class of inorganic compounds and
their biomedical applications. Front Biosci 2005,10,275-287
(420) Sakurai H. Therapeutic potential of vanadium in treating diabetes mellitus. Clin Calcium
(421) Domingo JL. Vanadium and tungsten derivatives as antidiabetic agents: a review of their
toxic effects. Biol Trace Elem Res 2002,88,97-112
(422) Sethi S, Ziouzenkova O, Ni H, Wagner DD, Plutzky J, Mayadas TN. Oxidized omega-3
fatty acids in fish oil inhibit leukocyte-endothelial interactions through activation of PPAR
alpha. Blood 2002,100,1340-1346
(423) Jump DB. The biochemistry of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J Biol Chem
(424) Hu FB, Bronner L, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rexrode KM, Albert CM, Hunter D, Manson
JE. Fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women. J
Am Med Assoc 2002,287,1815-1821
(425) Harper CR, Jacobson TA. The fats of life: the role of omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention
of coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med 2001,161,2185-2192
(426) Weber P, Raederstorff D. Triglyceride-lowering effect of omega-3 LC-polyunsaturated fatty
acids--a review. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2000,10,28-37
(427) Clarke SD. Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of gene transcription: a molecular
mechanism to improve the metabolic syndrome. J Nutr 2001,131,1129-1132
(428) Evans JL, Lin JJ, Goldfine ID. Novel approach to treat insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes,
and the metabolic syndrome: simultaneous activation of PPARa, PPARg, and PPARd.
Current Diabetes Reviews 2005,1,299-307
(429) Jump DB. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and regulation of gene transcription. Curr
Opin Lipidol 2002,13,155-164
(430) Clarke SD. Polyunsaturated fatty acid regulation of gene transcription: a mechanism to
improve energy balance and insulin resistance. Br J Nutr 2000,83 Suppl 1,S59-S66
(431) Xu HE, Lambert MH, Montana VG, Parks DJ, Blanchard SG, Brown PJ, Sternbach DD,
Lehmann JM, Wisely GB, Willson TM, Kliewer SA, Milburn MV. Molecular recognition of
fatty acids by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Mol Cell 1999,3,397-403
(432) Burr ML, Fehily AM, Gilbert JF, Rogers S, Holliday RM, Sweetnam PM, Elwood PC,
Deadman NM. Effects of changes in fat, fish, and fibre intakes on death and myocardial
reinfarction: diet and reinfarction trial (DART). Lancet 1989,2,757-761
(433) de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet,
traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocardial
infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation 1999,99,779-785
(434) Singh RB, Niaz MA, Sharma JP, Kumar R, Rastogi V, Moshiri M. Randomized, double-
blind, placebo-controlled trial of fish oil and mustard oil in patients with suspected acute
myocardial infarction: the Indian experiment of infarct survival--4. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther
(435) GISSI-Prevenzione Investigators. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty
acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial.
Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto miocardico. Lancet
(436) Kris-Etherton PM, Taylor DS, Yu-Poth S, Huth P, Moriarty K, Fishell V, Hargrove RL, Zhao
G, Etherton TD. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in the food chain in the United States. Am J
Clin Nutr 2000,71 (1 Suppl),179S-188S
(437) Roche HM. Unsaturated fatty acids. Proc Nutr Soc 1999,58,397-401
(438) Cleland JG, Freemantle N, Coletta AP, Clark AL. Clinical trials update from the American
PROACTIVE. Eur J Heart Fail 2006,8,105-110
(439) Friday KE, Childs MT, Tsunehara CH, Fujimoto WY, Bierman EL, Ensinck JW. Elevated
plasma glucose and lowered triglyceride levels from omega-3 fatty acid supplementation
in type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1989,12,276-281
(440) Vessby B, Boberg M. Dietary supplementation with n-3 fatty acids may impair glucose
homeostasis in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med
(441) Mcmanus RM, Jumpson J, Finegood DT, Clandinin MT, Ryan EA. A comparison of the
effects of n-3 fatty acids from linseed oil and fish oil in well-controlled type II diabetes.
Diabetes Care 1996,19,463-467
(442) Luo J, Rizkalla SW, Vidal H, Oppert JM, Colas C, Boussairi A, Guerremillo M, Chapuis
AS, Chevalier A, Durand G, Slama G. Moderate intake of n-3 fatty acids for 2 months has
no detrimental effect on glucose metabolism and could ameliorate the lipid profile in type
2 diabetic men: Results of a controlled study. Diabetes Care 1998,21,717-724
(443) Prince MJ, Deeg MA. Do n-3 fatty acids improve glucose tolerance and lipemia in
diabetics? Curr Opin Lipidol 1997,8,7-11
(444) Montori VM, Farmer A, Wollan PC, Dinneen SF. Fish oil supplementation in type 2
diabetes: a quantitative systematic review. Diabetes Care 2000,23,1407-1415
(445) Carpentier YA, Portois L, Malaisse WJ. n-3 fatty acids and the metabolic syndrome. Am J
Clin Nutr 2006,83 (6 Suppl),1499S-1504S
(446) Mostad IL, Bjerve KS, Bjorgaas MR, Lydersen S, Grill V. Effects of n-3 fatty acids in
subjects with type 2 diabetes: reduction of insulin sensitivity and time-dependent
alteration from carbohydrate to fat oxidation. Am J Clin Nutr 2006,84,540-550
(447) Pariza MW, Park Y, Cook ME. The biologically active isomers of conjugated linoleic acid.
Prog Lipid Res 2001,40,283-298
(448) Ha YL, Grimm NK, Pariza MW. Anticarcinogens from fried ground beef: heat-altered
derivatives of linoleic acid. Carcinogenesis 1987,8,1881-1887
(449) Ip C, Chin SF, Scimeca JA, Pariza MW. Mammary cancer prevention by conjugated
dienoic derivative of linoleic acid. Cancer Res 1991,51,6118-6124
(450) Belury MA. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid in health: physiological effects and
mechanisms of action. Annu Rev Nutr 2002,22,505-531
(451) MacDonald HB. Conjugated linoleic acid and disease prevention: a review of current
knowledge. J Am Coll Nutr 2000,19 (2 Suppl),111S-118S
(452) Moya-Camarena SY, Vanden Heuvel JP, Blanchard SG, Leesnitzer LA, Belury MA.
Conjugated linoleic acid is a potent naturally occurring ligand and activator of PPARa. J
Lipid Res 1999,40,1426-1433
(453) DeLany JP, West DB. Changes in body composition with conjugated linoleic acid. J Am
Coll Nutr 2000,19,487S-493S
(454) Ryder JW, Portocarrero CP, Song XM, Cui L, Yu M, Combatsiaris T, Galuska D, Bauman
DE, Barbano DM, Charron MJ, Zierath JR, Houseknecht KL. Isomer-specific antidiabetic
properties of conjugated linoleic acid. Improved glucose tolerance, skeletal muscle insulin
action, and UCP-2 gene expression. Diabetes 2001,50,1149-1157
(455) Belury MA, Mahon A, Banni S. The conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomer, t10c12-CLA, is
inversely associated with changes in body weight and serum leptin in subjects with type 2
diabetes mellitus. J Nutr 2003,133,257S-260S
(456) Salas-Salvado J, Marquez-Sandoval F, Bullo M. Conjugated linoleic acid intake in
humans: a systematic review focusing on its effect on body composition, glucose, and
lipid metabolism. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2006,46,479-488
(457) Brown JM, McIntosh MK. Conjugated linoleic acid in humans: regulation of adiposity and
insulin sensitivity. J Nutr 2003,133,3041-3046
(458) Bhattacharya A, Banu J, Rahman M, Causey J, Fernandes G. Biological effects of
conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease. J Nutr Biochem 2006,April 28 (Epub
ahead of print)
(459) Wang YW, Jones PJ. Conjugated linoleic acid and obesity control: efficacy and
mechanisms. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004,28,941-955
(460) Smedman A, Vessby B. Conjugated linoleic acid supplementation in humans--metabolic
effects. Lipids 2001,36,773-781
(461) Thom E, Wadstein J, Gudmundsen O. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat in
healthy exercising humans. J Int Med Res 2001,29,392-396
(462) Blankson H, Stakkestad JA, Fagertun H, Thom E, Wadstein J, Gudmundsen O.
Conjugated linoleic acid reduces body fat mass in overweight and obese humans. J Nutr
(463) Riserus U, Arner P, Brismar K, Vessby B. Treatment with dietary trans10cis12 conjugated
linoleic acid causes isomer-specific insulin resistance in obese men with the metabolic
syndrome. Diabetes Care 2002,25,1516-1521
(464) Riserus U, Basu S, Jovinge S, Fredrikson GN, Arnlov J, Vessby B. Supplementation with
conjugated linoleic acid causes isomer-dependent oxidative stress and elevated C-
reactive protein: a potential link to fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. Circulation
(465) Moloney F, Yeow TP, Mullen A, Nolan JJ, Roche HM. Conjugated linoleic acid
supplementation, insulin sensitivity, and lipoprotein metabolism in patients with type 2
diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 2004,80,887-895
(466) Riserus U, Vessby B, Arner P, Zethelius B. Supplementation with trans10cis12-conjugated
linoleic acid induces hyperproinsulinaemia in obese men: close association with impaired
insulin sensitivity. Diabetologia 2004,47,1016-1019
(467) Abebe W. Herbal medication: potential for adverse interactions with analgesic drugs. J
Clin Pharm Ther 2002,27,391-401
(468) Canter PH, Ernst E. Ginkgo biloba: a smart drug? A systematic review of controlled trials
of the cognitive effects of ginkgo biloba extracts in healthy people. Psychopharmacol Bull
(469) Birks J, Grimley EV, Van Dongen M. Ginkgo biloba for cognitive impairment and
dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002,CD003120
(470) Kudolo GB. The effect of 3-month ingestion of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) on
pancreatic beta-cell function in response to glucose loading in individuals with non-insulin-
dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Pharmacol 2001,41,600-611
... Its deficiency is associated with a number of clinical disorders, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Magnesium supplementation has been reported to improve insulin sensitivity in patients with T2D [25]. Among the investigated samples, PV was the richest in this metal, and its content was two-fold higher than in MA, another sample rich in Mg. ...
... It is the activator of fructose-1-6-bisphosphate aldolase and the inhibitor of fructose-1-6bisphosphatase. It can also have antioxidant activity, and is a cofactor in copper/zinc superoxide dismutase, the major antioxidant enzyme [25]. Manganese aids in glucose metabolism and is required for normal synthesis and secretion of insulin. ...
Full-text available
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a chronic disease with a growing prevalence worldwide. In addition to the conventional therapy, many T2D patients use phytotherapeutic preparations. In the present study, chemical composition, antioxidant, and α-glucosidase inhibiting activity of traditional antidiabetics from Croatian ethnomedicine (Achillea millefolium, Artemisia absinthium, Centaurium erythraea, Morusalba, Phaseolus vulgaris, Sambucus nigra, and Salvia officinalis) were assessed. The efficacy of water and 80% ethanol as extraction solvents for bioactive constituents was compared. HPLC analysis revealed that the prepared extracts were rich in phenols, especially rutin, ferulic, and chlorogenic acid. Antiradical (against DPPH and ABTS radicals), reducing (towards Mo6+ and Fe3+ ions), and enzyme inhibiting properties were in linear correlation with the content of phenolic constituents. Ethanolic extracts, richer in phenolic substances, showed dominant efficacy in those assays. Aqueous extracts, on the other hand, were better Fe2+ ion chelators and more active in the β-carotene linoleic acid assay. Extracts from S. officinalis and A. millefolium were particularly active antioxidants and α-glucosidase inhibitors. A. absinthium, another potent α-glucosidase inhibitor, contained chromium, a mineral that promotes insulin action. The investigated plants contained significant amounts of minerals useful in management of T2D, with negligible amounts of heavy metals deeming them safe for human use.
... Pravilna ishrana uz fizičku aktivnost predstavlja osnovu nefarmakoloških mera u prevenciji i kontroli dijabetesa [1]. Uzimajući u obzir da dijabetes predstavlja zdravstveni problem rastućih razmera, postoji sve veće interesovanje ka efektima suplementacije izolovanim nutrijentima i biološki aktivnim sastojcima u okviru medicinske nutritivne terapije dijabetesa [2]. Procenjuje se da više od polovine pacijenata sa dijabetesom koristi dijetetske suplemente [3]. ...
... S druge strane, postoje dokazi da suplementacija aminokiselinom leucinom može dovesti do sveukupnog poboljšanja homeostaze glukoze [16]. Takođe, utvrđeno je da suplementacija Largininom, kao prekursorom azot-monoksida, dovodi do povećanja osetljivosti β-ćelija pankreasa i poboljšanja endotelne funkcije kod osoba sa intolerancijom glukoze i metaboličkim sindromom [2]. ...
... Many pharmaceuticals commonly used today are structurally derived from the natural compounds that are found in traditional medicinal plants. For example, the development of the antihyperglycemic drug metformin can be traced to the traditional use of Galega officinalis to treat diabetes (Evans and Bahng, 2014). Botanicals that are most frequently promoted to help manage blood glucose levels include bitter melon (Momordica charantia), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum), gurmar (Gymnema sylvestre), ivy gourd (Coccinia grandis), nopal (Opuntia spp.), ginseng, Russian tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia), psyllium (Plantago ovata), and garlic (Allium sativum) (Cefalu et al., 2008). ...
... The prickly pear cactus is traditionally used to treat diabetes in the form of a blended "shake" that is prepared from young cladodes (Becerra-Jiménez and Andrade-Cetto, 2012). Nopal is rich in highly soluble fiber and pectin, which can affect intestinal glucose uptake, thus partly explaining its hypoglycemic actions (Frati et al., 1990;Evans and Bahng, 2014). Several studies have confirmed that a total extract and a juice from the plant can have antihyperglycemic effects (Ibañez-Camacho et al., 1983;Becerra-Jiménez and Andrade-Cetto, 2012). ...
Full-text available
Diabetes mellitus is a common effect of uncontrolled high blood sugar and it is associated with long-term damage, dysfunction, and failure of various organs. In the adult population, the global prevalence of diabetes has nearly doubled since 1980. Without effective prevention and management programs, the continuing significant rise in diabetes will have grave consequences on the health and lifespan of the world population, and also on the world economy. Supplements can be used to correct nutritional deficiencies or to maintain an adequate intake of certain nutrients. These are often used as treatments for diabetes, sometimes because they have lower costs, or are more accessible or “natural” compared to prescribed medications. Several vitamins, minerals, botanicals, and secondary metabolites have been reported to elicit beneficial effects in hypoglycemic actions in vivo and in vitro; however, the data remain conflicting. Many pharmaceuticals commonly used today are structurally derived from natural compounds from traditional medicinal plants. Botanicals that are most frequently used to help manage blood glucose include: bitter melon (Momordica charantia), fenugreek (Trigonella foenum graecum), gurmar (Gymnema sylvestre), ivy gourd (Coccinia indica), nopal (Opuntia spp.), ginseng, Russian tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus), cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia), psyllium (Plantago ovata), and garlic (Allium sativum). In majority of the herbal products and secondary metabolites used in treating diabetes, the mechanisms of action involve regulation of insulin signaling pathways, translocation of GLUT-4 receptor and/or activation the PPARγ. Several flavonoids inhibit glucose absorption by inhibiting intestinal α-amylase and α-glucosidase. In-depth studies to validate the efficacies and safeties of extracts of these traditional medicinal plants are needed, and large, well designed, clinical studies need to be carried out before the use of such preparations can be recommended for treatment and/or prevention of diabetes. The main focus of this review is to describe what we know to date of the active compounds in these, along with their glucose-lowering mechanisms, which are either through insulin-mimicking activity or enhanced glucose uptake.
... This is very important for those diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus. since EGb761 may cause a viral outbreak in patients taking efavirenz, an antiretroviral that is metabolized by CYP3A4 [107]. Clinical cases indicate interactions of EGb with anti-epileptics, aspirin, diuretics, ibuprofen, risperidone, rofecoxib, trazodone and warfarin [97, 108]. ...
Full-text available
Background: Mental disorders are the most common health problems in the worldwide population. Current medicines against these conditions have undesired side effects or limited effectiveness. These disadvantageous pharmacological and therapeutic characteristics provoke a low adherence to treatment in an important percentage of patients with mental disorders. Since ancient times, ethnically different groups have been using plants extracts as medicines for the treatment of mental conditions including dementia, depression and anxiety disorders. Among them are extracts of Ginkgo biloba, a tree in the division Gingophyta, that has been used by millions of people worldwide. Objective: This review aims to discuss current scientific evidence of efficacy, neuroprotective and antioxidant effects as mechanism of action, side effects and potential interaction with other commonly prescribed anxiolytic drugs. Methods: A PubMed search of preclinical studies as well as individual clinical trials and meta-analysis were scrutinized. Results: Various preclinical and clinical studies have shown a positive effect of Ginkgo biloba to improve cognitive abilities in impaired individuals and reducing anxiety under pathological conditions. Conclusion: A more advanced clinical research is needed to confirm the efficacy of Gingko biloba for the treatment of anxiety in different health conditions.
Living cells are actively engaged in conducting various processes, sustaining the survival of cells, depending on highly orchestrated biochemical reactions. The body of any living being is a beautifully sophisticated factory. However, any alteration in normal cell physiology leads to various cellular, biochemical, metabolic, histological, and molecular alterations. Metabolic disorder includes a group of threatening reasons that significantly increases the prevalence of various diseases such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, dyslipidemia (increased triglyceride levels, LDL, and VLDL but decreased HDL), increased blood pressure and irregular glucose metabolism, etc. Lifestyle changes, especially eating behaviors and physical activity, are predicted by two independent risk factors for the development of metabolic syndrome, more than genetic factors (only 10%) for the occurrence of metabolic disorder. These metabolic alterations often lead to organ damage, such as hepatic injury, renal damage, neurodegeneration, and reproductive abnormalities. Various drugs are available for the treatment of these metabolic disorders, but in one way or another, they have several other side defects, such as liver failure, kidney damage, neuronal injury, and several others. Phytopolyphenols such as phenols, alkaloids, flavonols, flavonoids, flavonoids, terpenes, saponins, etc. have therapeutic effectiveness in the treatment of many diseases. These phytochemicals are versatile and have a great deal of interest from the scientific community due to their numerous biological activities, bioavailability, and bio-accessibility, and these polyphenols are used to prevent various chronic diseases. In addition, polyphenol-rich diets serve as a buffer against various forms of oxidative stress, cancer, type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, pancreatitis, cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, lung diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. The use of medicinal herbs can also be an alternative/adjuvant treatment for both metabolic and chronic diseases.KeywordsPhytopolyphenolsTherapeuticsBiological activitiesBioavailabilityBio-accessibilityPolyphenol-rich dietMedicinal herbsMetabolic and chronic diseases
Full-text available
Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is characterized by increased circulating blood glucose levels. Several therapies are available to control glucose levels. However, nutritional choices play a major role in managing diabetes. Nutritional supplements can help in reducing the side effects of medicines on the individual so, this chapter will not only discuss several nutritional choices but also available nutritional supplements to control T2DM. Keeping in mind the traditional belief that food is medicine and as therapies are often associated with deleterious side effects, this chapter will discuss alternative and herbal medicines. In addition, life style alterations with proper nutritional choices is also important and will be touched upon in this chapter.
Full-text available
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is a socially relevant chronic disease with high prevalence worldwide. DM may lead to several vascular, macrovascular, and microvascular complications (cerebrovascular, coronary artery, and peripheral arterial diseases, retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy), often accelerating the progression of atherosclerosis. Dietary therapy is generally considered to be the first step in the treatment of diabetic patients. Among the current therapeutic options, such as insulin therapy and hypoglycemic drugs, in recent years, attention has been shifting to the effects and properties—that are still not completely known—of medicinal plants as valid and inexpensive therapeutic supports with limited side effects. In this review, we report the relevant effects of medicinal plants and nutraceuticals in diabetes. In particular, we paid attention to the organosulfur compounds (OSCs) present in plant extracts that due to their antioxidant, hypoglycemic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects, can contribute as cardioprotective agents in type 2 DM. OSCs derived from garlic (Allium sp.), due to their properties, can represent a valuable support to the diet in type 2 DM, as outlined in this manuscript based on both in vitro and in vivo studies. Moreover, a relevant characteristic of garlic OSCs is their ability to produce the gasotransmitter H2S, and many of their effects can be explained by this property. Indeed, in recent years, several studies have demonstrated the relevant effects of endogenous and exogenous H2S in human DM, including by in vitro and in vivo experiments and clinical trials; therefore, here, we summarize the effects and the underlying molecular mechanisms of H2S and natural H2S donors.
There is a limited supply of sport nutrition supplements currently available for vegan or vegetarian athletes. In addition, the efficacy of a vegan or vegetarian pre-workout supplement that does not contain any processed ingredients or stimulants is currently unknown. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effects of an unprocessed vegan pre-workout supplement on high-intensity cycling performance. Participants completed three separate cycling trials following the consumption of a vegan pre-workout supplement, an isocaloric processed supplement, or a zero-calorie placebo supplement. Each supplement was consumed 30 minutes prior to each trial, and each cycling trial was separated by a minimum of 72 hours. Supplements were administered using a randomized, double-blind cross-over design. Each cycling trial was performed at a workload equal to 80% VO2peak until exhaustion. The average time in seconds (s) until exhaustion values for the vegan, isocaloric, and zero-calorie supplements were 482 ± 163, 480 ± 157, and 496 ± 238, respectively. Consumption of the vegan supplement did not significantly improve performance compared to an isocaloric and zero-calorie supplement (F = 0.12, p =.89). The results of this study indicate that individuals who choose a vegan pre-workout supplement (over an isocaloric or zero-calorie product) will not experience any acute decrements or ergogenic benefits in cycling performance. Although the present study does not support performance benefits of the tested vegan pre-workout supplement before cycling, additional research examining various exercise intensities and modalities is warranted.
The objectives of this article are to provide a brief overview of the scientific literature regarding the use of fenugreek in the management of hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia and suggest recommendations for additional research. Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L., family Fabaceae) is an annual herb with triangular yellow flowers and seed-containing pods that grows in countries of the Mediterranean, Middle East, India, China, and, more recently, Canada. Fenugreek seed or its extracts are found in food products such as frozen dairy products, gelatin puddings, candy, and gravy sauces and in alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages. An extract of fenugreek also is used as a flavoring ingredient in imitation maple syrup. Fenugreek has a history of use in traditional medicine in India and China. Its uses include as a treatment of weakness and leg edema, as a lactation and appetite stimulant, and as a remedy for indigestion, baldness, and fever. Some have used it topically for myalgia, wound treatment, and cellulitis. One potential benefit of fenugreek is improving elevated blood glucose and lipid levels associated with chronic conditions such as diabetes and obesity. Human investigations suggest that fenugreek can be beneficial as an adjunct in controlling high blood glucose and lipid levels in people with diabetes. However, larger, adequately powered, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials examining multiple measures of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism and insulin homeostasis are needed.
Full-text available
Background: Observational data suggest a protective effect of several antioxidants on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and type 2 diabetes. However, randomized trials have yielded inconsistent results. Objectives: The first objective was to assess the effect of 7.5 y of antioxidant supplementation on FPG at 7.5 y. The second objective was to examine the epidemiologic association of baseline dietary intakes or plasma antioxidants and FPG (at baseline and at 7.5 y). Design: Subjects (n = 3146) from the Supplementation en Vitamines et Minéraux Antioxydants (SU.VI.MAX) primary prevention trial in France were randomly assigned to receive a daily capsule containing 120 mg vitamin C, 30 mg vitamin E, 6 mg β-carotene, 100 μg Se, and 20 mg Zn or a placebo. Results: After 7.5 y, no significant difference was observed between age-adjusted mean FPG in men (P = 0.78) and women (P = 0.89) in either group. Baseline β-carotene dietary intakes and plasma concentrations were inversely associated with FPG in multivariate mixed models (P = 0.0045 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Baseline plasma vitamin C and selenium were negatively (P = 0.0455) and positively (P < 0.0001) associated, respectively, with FPG. Conclusions: Supplementation with antioxidants at nutritional doses for 7.5 y had no effect on FPG in men or women who followed a balanced diet. An inverse association of baseline β-carotene dietary intake and plasma concentrations with FPG was found, probably because β-carotene is an indirect marker of fruit and vegetable intakes.
In vitro and in vivo animal studies have reported strong insulin-like or insulin-potentiating effects after cinnamon administration. Recently, a human intervention study showed that cinnamon supplementation (1 g/d) strongly reduced fasting blood glucose concentration (30%) and improved the blood lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of cinnamon supplementation on insulin sensitivity and/or glucose tolerance and blood lipid profile in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, a total of 25 postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes (aged 62.9 +/- 1.5 y, BMI 30.4 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)) participated in a 6-wk intervention during which they were supplemented with either cinnamon (Cinnamomum cassia, 1.5 g/d) or a placebo. Before and after 2 and 6 wk of supplementation, arterialized blood samples were obtained and oral glucose tolerance tests were performed. Blood lipid profiles and multiple indices of whole-body insulin sensitivity were determined. There were no time X treatment interactions for whole-body insulin sensitivity or oral glucose tolerance. The blood lipid profile of fasting subjects did not change after cinnamon supplementation. We conclude that cinnamon supplementation (1.5 g/d) does not improve whole-body insulin sensitivity or oral glucose tolerance and does not modulate blood lipid profile in postmenopausal patients with type 2 diabetes. More research on the proposed health benefits of cinnamon supplementation is warranted before health claims should be made.
Background: Epidemiologic studies have suggested a lower risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) at higher intakes of fruit, vegetables, and whole grain. Whether this association is due to antioxidant vitamins or some other factors remains unclear. Objective: We studied the relation between the intake of antioxidant vitamins and CHD risk. Design: A cohort study pooling 9 prospective studies that included information on intakes of vitamin E, carotenoids, and vitamin C and that met specific criteria was carried out. During a 10-y follow-up, 4647 major incident CHD events occurred in 293 172 subjects who were free of CHD at baseline. Results: Dietary intake of antioxidant vitamins was only weakly related to a reduced CHD risk after adjustment for potential nondietary and dietary confounding factors. Compared with subjects in the lowest dietary intake quintiles for vitamins E and C, those in the highest intake quintiles had relative risks of CHD incidence of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.00; P = 0.17) and 1.23 (1.04, 1.45; P = 0.07), respectively, and the relative risks for subjects in the highest intake quintiles for the various carotenoids varied from 0.90 to 0.99. Subjects with higher supplemental vitamin C intake had a lower CHD incidence. Compared with subjects who did not take supplemental vitamin C, those who took >700 mg supplemental vitamin C/d had a relative risk of CHD incidence of 0.75 (0.60, 0.93; P for trend < 0.001). Supplemental vitamin E intake was not significantly related to reduced CHD risk. Conclusions: The results suggest a reduced incidence of major CHD events at high supplemental vitamin C intakes. The risk reductions at high vitamin E or carotenoid intakes appear small.
A large number of neuroanatomical, neurophysiologic, and neurochemical mechanisms are thought to contribute to the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain (NP). As a result, a corresponding wide range of treatments have been employed to treat patients with NP, including antiepileptic drugs, opioid analgesics, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, cholecystokinin receptor antagonists, adenosine, lipoic acid, cannabinoids, isosorbide dinitrate, dronabinol, capsaicin, protein kinase C inhibitors, aldose reductase inhibitors, and VR-1 receptor modulators. Many of these compounds are limited by marginal efficacy and clinically significant adverse events; few have been evaluated in well-controlled, large-scale clinical trials. At present, the only agents approved for the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy and postherpetic neuralgia are lidocaine patches 5%, duloxetine, gabapentin, and pregabalin. Of these, only pregabalin is indicated for both conditions.
Most physicians recommend the American Heart Association (AHA) Step I or Step 11 diet to patients at risk for heart disease and stroke, but recent studies suggest there might be a better approach. The Mediterranean diet, which has been around for thousands of years, offers a practical, effective, and enjoyable strategy that is relatively easy to adopt and more likely to be successful over the long term than most other heart-healthy diets. In this article, Drs Curtis and O'Keefe review the current understanding and scientific evidence related to cardioprotective diets and present practical ideas for implementation.
In the first report (Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2000:647-654), it was shown that ingestion of 120 mg of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) daily for 3 months by normal glucose-tolerant individuals caused a significant increase in pancreatic beta -cell insulin and C-peptide response, measured as the area under the curve (AUC(0 --> 120)) during a 2-hour standard (75 g) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). This follow-up study was designed to determine the effect of the same Ginkgo biloba treatment on glucose-stimulated pancreatic beta -cell function in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) subjects. In diet-controlled subjects (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 117 +/- 36 mg/dl; fasting plasma insulin [FPI], 29 +/- 8 muU/ml; n = 6), ingestion of Ginkgo biloba produced no significant effect on the insulin AUC(0 --> 120) (193 +/- 53 vs. 182 +/- 58 muU/ml/h, before and after ingesting Ginkgo biloba, respectively). In hyperinsulinemic NIDDM subjects taking oral hypoglycemic medications (n = 6) (FPG 143 +/- 48 mg/dl; FPI 46 +/- 13 muU/ml), ingestion of Ginkgo biloba caused blunted plasma insulin levels from 30 to 120 minutes during the OGTT, leading to a reduction of the insulin AUC(0 --> 120) (199 +/- 33 vs. 147 +/- 58 muU/ml/h, before and after Ginkgo biloba, respectively). The C-peptide levels increased, and so the AUC(0 --> 120) did not parallel the insulin AUC(0 --> 120) creating a dissimilar insulin/C-peptide ratio indicative of an enhanced hepatic extraction of insulin relative to C-peptide. Thus, in pancreatic beta -cells that are already maximally stimulated, ingestion of Ginkgo biloba may cause a reduction in plasma insulin levels. Only in NIDDM subjects with pancreatic exhaustion (FPG 152 +/- 46 mg/dl; FPI 16 +/- 8 muU/ml; n = 8), who also took oral hypoglycemic agents, did Ginkgo biloba ingestion significantly increase pancreatic beta -cell function in response to glucose loading (insulin AUC(0 --> 120) increased from 51 +/- 29 to 98 +/- 20 muU/ml/h, p < 0.0001), paralleled by a C-peptide AUC(0 --> 120) increase from 7.2 +/- 2.8 to 13.7 +/- 6.8 (p < 0.0001). Whether this increase is due to "resuscitation" of previously exhausted islets or increased activity of only the remaining functional islets is unclear. However, not even in this group did increased pancreatic beta -cell activity cause a reduction of blood glucose during the OGTT It is concluded that ingestion of Ginkgo biloba extract by an NIDDM subject may increase the hepatic metabolic clearance rate of not only insulin but also She hypoglycemic agents. The result is reduced insulin-mediated glucose metabolism and elevated blood glucose. (C) 2001 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.