ArticlePDF Available

Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of 31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2012: Some New Facts

Authors:

Abstract and Figures

In the Tables 1.1 to 1.4 the size and development of 31 European and of five non-European shadow economies over the period 2003-2012 is presented 1 . If we first look at the results of the average size of the shadow economy of the 27 European Union countries, we realize, that the shadow economy in the year 2003 was 22.3% (of official GDP), decreased to 19.3% in 2008 and increased to 19.8 % in 2009 and then decreased again to 18.4 % in 2012 (Table 1.1). If we compare the average of 31 European countries, in 2003 the average size was 22.4%, decreased to 19.4% in 2008, and increased to 19.9%in 2009 and decreased to 18.5 in 2012 (Table 1.2). If we consider the development of the shadow economy of Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand and the USA, we find a similar movement over time (see Table 1.3.); in 2012 these 5 countries had an average size of the shadow economy of 9.18%, in 2010 this value was 10.1%. If we consider the last 2 years (2011 and 2012) and compare them with the year 2008, we realize that in most countries we had again a decrease of the size and development of the shadow economy. This is due to the fact of the recovery from the world wide economic and financial crises. Hence the most important reason for this decrease is, that, if the official economy is recovering or booming, people have less incentives to undertake additional activi-ties in the shadow economy and to earn extra "black" money. The only exception is Greece, where the recession of the official economy is so strong, that it even reduced the demand of the shadow economy activities due to the severe income losses of the Greece people; the *) Prof. Dr. Dr.h. 1 The calculation of the size and development of the shadow economy is done with the MIMIC (Multiple Indica-tors and Multiple Courses) estimation procedure. As with the MIMIC estimation procedure one gets out only relative values, with the help of the currency demand approach for a few countries (Austria, Germany, Poland and Switzerland). These values have been calibrated into absolute ones. Source: Friedrich Schneider, Shadow Economy around the World: What do we really know?, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 21/2, Sep-tember 2005, page 598-642.
Content may be subject to copyright.
Page 1 of 7
ShadEcEurope31_March 2012.doc
Size and Development of the Shadow Economy of
31 European and 5 other OECD Countries from 2003 to 2012:
Some New Facts
by
Friedrich Schneider
*)
In the Tables 1.1 to 1.4 the size and development of 31 European and of five non-European
shadow economies over the period 2003-2012 is presented
1
. If we first look at the results of
the average size of the shadow economy of the 27 European Union countries, we realize, that
the shadow economy in the year 2003 was 22.3% (of official GDP), decreased to 19.3% in
2008 and increased to 19.8 % in 2009 and then decreased again to 18.4 % in 2012 (Table 1.1).
If we compare the average of 31 European countries, in 2003 the average size was 22.4%,
decreased to 19.4% in 2008, and increased to 19.9%in 2009 and decreased to 18.5 in 2012
(Table 1.2). If we consider the development of the shadow economy of Australia, Canada,
Japan, New Zealand and the USA, we find a similar movement over time (see Table 1.3.); in
2012 these 5 countries had an average size of the shadow economy of 9.18%, in 2010 this
value was 10.1%.
If we consider the last 2 years (2011 and 2012) and compare them with the year 2008, we
realize that in most countries we had again a decrease of the size and development of the
shadow economy. This is due to the fact of the recovery from the world wide economic and
financial crises. Hence the most important reason for this decrease is, that, if the official
economy is recovering or booming, people have less incentives to undertake additional activi-
ties in the shadow economy and to earn extra “black” money. The only exception is Greece,
where the recession of the official economy is so strong, that it even reduced the demand of
the shadow economy activities due to the severe income losses of the Greece people; the
*)
Prof. Dr. Dr.h.c.mult. Friedrich Schneider, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University, Alten-
bergerst. 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria, Phone:+43 (0)732 2468-8210, Fax: +43 (0)732 2468-8209, E-mail: frie-
drich.schneider@jku.at, http://www.econ.jku.at/schneider
1
The calculation of the size and development of the shadow economy is done with the MIMIC (Multiple Indica-
tors and Multiple Courses) estimation procedure. As with the MIMIC estimation procedure one gets out only
relative values, with the help of the currency demand approach for a few countries (Austria, Germany, Poland
and Switzerland). These values have been calibrated into absolute ones. Source: Friedrich Schneider, Shadow
Economy around the World: What do we really know?, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 21/2, Sep-
tember 2005, page 598-642.
Page 2 of 7
Greek shadow economy will decrease to 22.5% of official GDP in 2012; a decrease of 1.4
percentage points compared to the year 2010!
Furthermore there are three different developments with respect to the size of the shadow
economy:
(1) The eastern countries or the new European Union members, like Bulgaria, like Cyprus,
like the Czech Republic, like Latvia, like Lithuania, like Poland have a higher shadow
economies than the “old” European Union countries, like Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ita-
ly; hence we have an increase of the size of the shadow economy from west to east.
(2) Also we observe an increase of the size and development of the shadow economy from
north to south. On average the southern European countries have considerable higher
shadow economies than the one in Central and Western Europe. This can also be demon-
strated looking at Figures 1 and 2.
(3) The five other highly developed OECD countries (Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand
and the United States in Table 1.3) have a much lower shadow economy about 10.1 % of
GDP average in 2009 which decreased to 9.2% in 2012.
Page 3 of 7
Figure 1: Size of the Shadow Economy of 31 European Countries in 2012 (in % of off. GDP)
Source: own calculations, March 2012
Size of the shadow economy (in % of GDP)
Page 4 of 7
Figure 2: Size of the Shadow Economy of 31 European Countries in 2011 (in % of off. GDP)
Source: own calculations, March 2012
Size of the shadow economy (in % of GDP)
Page 5 of 7
Table 1.1: Size of the Shadow Economy of 31 European Countries over 2003 – 2012 (in % of off. GDP)
Country / Year
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Austria 10.8
11
10.3
9.7
9.4
8.1
8.47
8.2
7.9
7.6
Belgium 21.4
20.7
20.1
19.2
18.3
17.5
17.8
17.4
17.1
16.8
Bulgaria 35.9
35.3
34.4
34
32.7
32.1
32.5
32.6
32.3
31.9
Cyprus 28.7
28.3
28.1
27.9
26.5
26
26.5
26.2
26
25.6
Czech Republic 19.5
19.1
18.5
18.1
17
16.6
16.9
16.7
16.4
16.0
Denmark 17.4
17.1
16.5
15.4
14.8
13.9
14.3
14
13.8
13.4
Estonia 30.7
30.8
30.2
29.6
29.5
29
29.6
29.3
28.6
28.2
Finland 17.6
17.2
16.6
15.3
14.5
13.8
14.2
14
13.7
13.3
France 14.7
14.3
13.8
12.4
11.8
11.1
11.6
11.3
11
10.8
Germany 17.1
16.1
15.4
15
14.7
14.2
14.6
13.9
13.7
13.3
Greece 28.2
28.1
27.6
26.2
25.1
24.3
25
25.4
24.3
24.0
Hungary 25
24.7
24.5
24.4
23.7
23
23.5
23.3
22.8
22.5
Ireland 15.4
15.2
14.8
13.4
12.7
12.2
13.1
13
12.8
12.7
Italy 26.1
25.2
24.4
23.2
22.3
21.4
22
21.8
21.2
21.6
Latvia 30.4
30
29.5
29
27.5
26.5
27.1
27.3
26.5
26.1
Lithuania 32
31.7
31.1
30.6
29.7
29.1
29.6
29.7
29.0
28.5
Luxemburg (Grand-Duché) 9.8
9.8
9.9
10
9.4
8.5
8.8
8.4
8.2
8.2
Malta 26.7
26.7
26.9
27.2
26.4
25.8
25.9
26
25.8
25.3
Netherlands 12.7
12.5
12
10.9
10.1
9.6
10.2
10
9.8
9.5
Poland 27.7
27.4
27.1
26.8
26
25.3
25.9
25.4
25
24.4
Portugal 22.2
21.7
21.2
20.1
19.2
18.7
19.5
19.2
19.4
19.4
Romania 33.6
32.5
32.2
31.4
30.2
29.4
29.4
29.8
29.6
29.1
Slovenia 26.7
26.5
26
25.8
24.7
24
24.6
24.3
24.1
23.6
Spain 22.2
21.9
21.3
20.2
19.3
18.4
19.5
19.4
19.2
19.2
Slovakia 18.4
18.2
17.6
17.3
16.8
16
16.8
16.4
16
15.5
Sweden 18.6
18.1
17.5
16.2
15.6
14.9
15.4
15
14.7
14.3
United Kingdom 12.2
12.3
12
11.1
10.6
10.1
10.9
10.7
10.5
10.1
27 EU-Countries / Average
(unweighted) 22.3
21.9
21.5
20.8
19.9
19.3
19.8
19.5
19.2
18.4
Source: Own Calculations, March 2012
Page 6 of 7
Table 1.2: Size of the Shadow Economy of 4 European Countries (Non EU-Members) over 2003 – 2012 (in % of off. GDP)
Country / Year 2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Croatia 32.3
32.3
31.5
31.2
30.4
29.6
30.1
29.8
29.5
29.0
Norway 18.6
18.2
17.6
16.1
15.4
14.7
15.3
15.1
14.8
14.2
Switzerland 9.5
9.4
9
8.5
8.2
7.9
8.3
8.1
7.8
7.6
Turkey 32.2
31.5
30.7
30.4
29.1
28.4
28.9
28.3
27.7
27.2
Non EU-Countries / Avera-
ge 23.2
22.9
22.2
21.6
20.8
20.2
20.7
20.3
19.9
19.5
Unweighted Average of all
31 European Countries 22.4
22.1
21.6
20.9
20.1
19.4
19.9
19.7
19.3
18.5
Source: Own Calculations, March 2012
Table 1.3: Size of the Shadow Economy of 5 Highly Developed Non- European Countries over 2003 – 2012 (in % of off. GDP)
Country / Year 2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
Australia 13.7
13.2
12.6
11.4
11.7
10.6
10.9
10.3
10.1
9.8
Canada 15.3
15.1
14.3
13.2
12.6
12
12.6
12.2
11.9
11.5
Japan 11
10.7
10.3
9.4
9
8.8
9.5
9.2
9
8.8
New Zealand 12.3
12.2
11.7
10.4
9.8
9.4
9.9
9.6
9.3
8.8
United States USA 8.5
8.4
8.2
7.5
7.2
7
7.6
7.2
7
7.0
Other OECD Countries /
Unweighted Average 12.16
11.92
11.42
10.38
10.06
9.56
10.1
9.7
9.46
9.18
Source: Own Calculations, March 2012
Page 7 of 7
Table 1.4: Size of the Shadow Economy of Various Unweighted Averages over 2003 – 2012 (in % of off. GDP)
Averages / Year
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
27 EU-Countries / Average
(unweighted) 22.3
21.9
21.5
20.8
19.9
19.3
19.8
19.5
19.4
18.4
4 Non EU-Countries / Average
(unweighted) 23.2
22.9
22.2
21.6
20.8
20.2
20.7
20.3
20.0
19.5
5 Other OECD Countries / Average
(unweighted) 12.2
11.9
11.4
10.4
10.1
9.6
10.1
9.7
9.5
9.18
All 36 Countries / Average
(unweighted) 19.2
18.9
18.4
17.6
16.9
16.3
16.9
16.5
16.3
15.7
Source: Own Calculations, March 2012
... However, the informal economy presents significant macroeconomic trade-offs. Schneider (2015) estimates that developing countries lose $1.5-2 trillion annually in uncollected tax revenues due to informality. This fiscal gap constrains public investment in human capital formation -a key determinant of long-term growth (Hanushek & Woessmann, 2008). ...
Article
Full-text available
Entrepreneurship thrives—or falters—in the shadow of corruption. This paper delves into the paradoxical role corruption plays in shaping entrepreneurial ecosystems within developing economies. While corruption erodes trust, inflates costs, and stifles innovation, it can also serve as an unlikely lifeline for entrepreneurs navigating bureaucratic quagmires. Drawing on Principal-Agent Theory and Institutional Theory, the study uncovers how corruption influences entrepreneurial entry, survival, and strategic adaptation. From bribery as a "grease payment" to informal networks replacing broken institutions. This research challenges one-size-fits-all anti-corruption policies, advocating instead for nuanced reforms that curb exploitation while preserving the agility of entrepreneurs operating in imperfect systems. For policymakers and business leaders alike, this study offers a roadmap to foster resilience—not just compliance—in the face of institutional decay.
... Previous studies have found that religion and the level of religiosity significantly influence decision-making and financial risk-taking (Schneider, 2015). Furthermore, other studies have demonstrated that risk aversion correlates with an individual's level of religiosity (Breuer, 2014). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to explore the Islamic perspective on financial literacy education for children and to analyze whether the Qur'an and Hadith provide guidance on managing wealth, assets, and financial decision-making. The research employs a library research methodology, gathering data and documents from primary and secondary sources. Content analysis was used as the data analysis method to refine and expand upon existing theories. The findings reveal that, based on the interpretation of several Qur'anic verses, Hadiths (including insights into the wealth and economic practices of the Prophet Muhammad), and Islamic literature, the Islamic perspective recognizes financial literacy education for children as an essential component. However, its practical application must be tailored to align with the developmental stages of children.
... Autori pri aproximácii tieňovej ekonomiky pracujú so zúženou definíciou tieňovej ekonomiky. Táto tieňovú ekonomiku chápe ako legálne podnikateľské aktivity ekonomických subjektov vykonávané mimo dosahu vládnych autorít (Schneider, 2015). Z toho vyplýva, že nezachytáva úniky z nelegálnych aktivít kriminálneho charakteru (predaj drog, prostitúcia, majetková trestná činnosť a iné), domácu prácu a susedskú výpomoc. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Tax evasion is a global societal problem that developed, developing and transit economies have to face. Tax evasion and the shadow economy deforms the economic environment, jeopardizes the process of public budgeting and, as a result, limits the government's ability to implement economic policy. The extent of tax evasion is frequently deduced from various factors that have a direct or indirect effect on the economy and are related to tax evasion. The aim of the article is to investigate the impact and dependence of selected indicators (GDP, inflation, tax-social burden and unemployment) on the degree of tax evasion in the European Union on the basis of correlation analysis and regression analysis. The article uses data from Eurostat and World Bank databases for the period of 2000 - 2015.
... North, Wallis, and Weingast (2009) discuss how the institutional framework of a country plays a pivotal role in determining the prevalence of informal activities. Schneider (2013), in contrast, found that countries with low tax rates and fewer restrictions appear to have smaller shadow economies, promoting formal economic growth and healthier compliance. On the contrary, the countries with strict regulations and high tax rates were likely to be negatively impacted by the massive shadow economy, as it distorts competition and reduces tax revenues. ...
Article
A model of equations known as the VAR model has been employed to investigate the relationships among four endogenous variables: the growth rate of GDP, the shadow economy, the inflation rate, and final consumption expenditure. The initial response of GDP to shocks from the shadow economy is negative for the first three quarters, with the effect gradually decreasing from the fifth to the tenth quarter. In the first and second quarters, there is no observable impact on GDP due to shocks from the inflation rate; however, this shock becomes harmful between the third and fifth quarters before stabilizing and dissipating. The findings from the impulse response function suggest that GDP responds positively to changes in final consumption expenditure during the first two quarters, with the influence waning from the third quarter onward. Over the forecast horizon, the effect of the shadow economy on GDP variation is estimated to range from 3.38% to 6.11%, while the inflation rate's impact fluctuates between 0.06% and 5.05%, and final consumption expenditure contributes to changes between 0.31% and 0.34%. Furthermore, the analysis of forecast error variance decomposition throughout the projected period indicates that GDP variation is considerably influenced by the dynamics of the shadow economy, inflation rate, and consumption expenditure.
... North, Wallis, and Weingast (2009) discuss how the institutional framework of a country plays a pivotal role in determining the prevalence of informal activities. Schneider (2013), in contrast, found that countries with low tax rates and fewer restrictions appear to have smaller shadow economies, promoting formal economic growth and healthier compliance. On the contrary, the countries with strict regulations and high tax rates were likely to be negatively impacted by the massive shadow economy, as it distorts competition and reduces tax revenues. ...
Article
Full-text available
A multiple regression analysis was conducted to assess the influence of the shadow economy, inflation rate, and GDP growth rate on tax revenue. The regression model utilized level data, and the two-step Engle and Granger cointegration test confirmed the absence of spurious relationships between the dependent and independent variables. Various diagnostic tests associated with OLS methods were performed, including assessments for multicollinearity, heteroscedasticity, and serial autocorrelation. To ensure the robustness of the standard errors, the HAC standard errors and covariance were applied. The empirical findings of this research demonstrated that the growth of the shadow economy has a statistically significant negative impact on tax revenue in Cambodia. Furthermore, the results indicated a negative relationship between inflation and tax revenue, while a positive correlation was found between real GDP growth and tax revenue.
... Coase [23] studied "Transaction costs of a firm as costs of using the market mechanism transaction costs of a firm as costs of using the market mechanism". Schneider [24] studied "Shadow Economy as amortization of Crisis". Schneider [25] studied "Shadow Economy and transaction cost". ...
Article
Full-text available
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of project management and partnership banking. Due to the shortage of investment, Ukraine always needs to plan for financial resources. All over the world, partnership banking is becoming an increasingly common and attractive type of investment in projects. In the conditions of modern Ukraine, with the need to restore industrial and infrastructure construction projects, one can predict significant growth in the construction services market and the need for investment. In this study, the ways of possible increasing investment in the construction industry have been discussed based on the use of a logical-structural approach in project management and partnership banking as a source of investment.
Article
Full-text available
The assessment of the informal economy's impact on economic growth in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) member states was carried out using three different static panel data models: pooled Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), random effects, and fixed effects models. This comprehensive study covered a period of twenty-seven years and included ten countries, yielding a total of 270 observations. The estimated coefficient for the informal economy in the random effects model was 0.0780, while in the fixed effects model it was 0.1747, both of which were statistically significant at the 5% level. These results indicated that an increase in the formal economy would contribute positively to real GDP growth in the ASEAN member states. Additionally, both panel data models revealed that the inflation rate significantly affected real GDP, although the estimated coefficients were negative, with values of -0.0723 for the RE model and -0.0995 for the FE model, both significant at the 1% level. Conversely, the research did not find a significant relationship between population growth rate and real GDP. Notably, there was no significant correlation between any of the variables and real GDP when analyzed under the OLS model.
Article
Purpose – the aim of this study is to assess the relationship and influence between the shadow economy and the level of happiness in the Euro area economies of the European Union by highlighting the theoretical assumptions behind the concept and expression of the shadow economy and happiness. Research methodology – to calculate the size of the shadow economy will be used Gutmann’s index. To calculate the happiness of the economies will used the Happiness Economy Index from the World Happiness Report (2022) including the following 6 indicators (GDP per capita, healthy life expectancy (that derives to life expectancy and mental health evaluation), social support, freedom index, generosity (do-nations to charity), and corruption index. To determine the relationship between the shadow and happiness economy, the Granger causality method. Research limitations – the study’s limitations include data reliability and accuracy, methodological limitations, geographical and cultural differences, and time constraints. The estimation of the size of the shadow economy and the happiness economy index may contain inaccuracies, and the Granger causality method cannot fully confirm causality. The study is limited to the euro area countries of the European Union; therefore, the results may not be fully applicable to other countries. Additionally, the data may not fully capture long-term trends or developments. Practical implications – the results of this study can help policymakers and economists better understand how to reduce the size of the shadow economy and thereby increase people’s happiness. The study’s findings indicate a positive correlation between a country’s Happiness Economy Index and the size of its shadow economy. This suggests that investing in people’s well-being can positively impact the formal economy. Furthermore, the study’s findings can inform the development of effective strategies to combat the informal economy. For instance, strategies such as enhancing social support, increasing the freedom index, and combating corruption can potentially reduce the size of the informal economy and improve the overall economic situation in a country. Findings/Value – the research confirmed the hypothesis that the size of the shadow economy is smaller in countries with a higher happiness economy index. And Granger causality tests show that the shadow economy has a relatively strong effect on happiness in the EU euro area countries.
Article
Full-text available
Government budgeting and expenditure policies play a central role in shaping national economic trajectories, influencing fiscal sustainability, and determining the quality of public services. This article provides a comprehensive review of the multifaceted effects of public budgeting, addressing key issues such as the impact of government spending on economic growth, the dynamics of budget deficits and public debt sustainability, and the roles of fiscal rules, gender budgeting, and political cycles. Additional attention is given to the effectiveness of performance based budgeting, the challenges of balancing budgets in welfare states, and the implications of military spending, budget transparency, and participatory budgeting on governance and public trust. Further discussions analyze how fiscal decentralization, off-budget expenditures, and differing budgeting frameworks between federal and unitary states affect long-term economic stability and public finance. By synthesizing empirical and theoretical insights, this article offers policy recommendations to enhance fiscal discipline, encourage citizen engagement, and promote sustainable economic growth.
Article
Under-taxation is a major feature of economies in developing countries and one that has been little ignored in the subsequent literature on the informal sector. Tax evasion is an endemic and more predictable problem in developing countries striving to balance their budgets. Its effects have been extensively studied in the empirical literature. In this article, we examine the role of tax evasion on the size of the informal sector. Using a sample of 99 developing countries, we specify and estimate a panel data model using the ordinary least squares, fixed effects and generalized least squares methods. Our analysis of tax evasion implies significant improvement for the informal sector. Controlled by two complementary measures of the informal sector (the ‘multiple indicators, multiple causes’ indicator and share of informal firms), our results remain statistically significant, robust and stable overall. We suggest a policy of using carrots, for example, by digitizing tax procedures, and sticks, such as tax adjustments, to promote the development of the informal sector.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.