Content uploaded by Muhammad Hanif
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Muhammad Hanif on Nov 12, 2014
Content may be subject to copyright.
Hanif et al., 2014. Sci. Tech. and Dev. 33 (3): 107-109
* hanif_mechanization@yahoo.com
IMPACT OF TYPE AND PARTICLE SIZE ON THE PROTEIN
CONTENTS IN WHEAT FLOUR
MUHAMMAD HANIF*, MANSOOR KHAN KHATTAK, MASOOD-UR-RAHMAN, SHAIZA SHEIKH
SHER, HAFIZULLAH, SAQIB KHAN, MUHAMMAD SAEED, ABDULLAH KHAN AND
MUHAMMAD SAQLAIN
Department of Agricultural Mechanization, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, University of Agriculture
Peshawar, Pakistan.
Abstract
Two main types of wheat flours that are fine and branded flours used in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa,
Pakistan, were analysed for their particle size. Sieve analysis was carried out which gave eight
samples of different particle sizes, divided into fractions and ranged from 63-100, 100-250, 250-
350 and larger than 350 µm. All the four sizes of the each flour type were analysed for their protein
content, using Kjeldahl method by Kjeltec-1002 apparatus. The results showed that more proteins
(11.8%) were recorded in fine flour as compared to (11.3%) in branded flour. Also it was observed
that reducing the size from 350 µm to 63 µm caused 13% protein loss in branded wheat flour and
11% in fine flour. It was concluded that wheat flour with particle size smaller than 350-250 µm
significantly lost its protein content. So it is recommended to grind wheat in such a way that the
particle size remains greater than 250 µm.
Keywords: Branded, Fine, Particle size, Proteins, Wheat flour.
Introduction
Milling requirements of more than 80%
countries for wheat is being done using conventional
Burr mill operated by engines or electric motors. For
grinding of wheat, flour mills fitted with cast iron
steel plates and emery stones have successfully
replaced the old traditional red stoned discs mills all
over the world, especially, in South Asia (Ramappa
et al., 2010). In Pakistan, beside Burr mills, which
are on large scale, small mills of conventional types
are still used in good number both in urban and rural
areas but the overall efficiency of these mills was
found to be very poor which results in low quality of
flour (Dorosh and Salam, 2008). In the past decade
technology has became very advanced by the
development of new mills for grinding of wheat
grains in which cast iron steel plates are present for
grinding and sharing on which the radial grooves of
different shapes running from the center of the plate
to the periphery have significantly improved the
milling performance of wheat and have improved
the quality of wheat flour (Banu, 2011).
The size of ground wheat flour is the most
important parameter judging the quality of the flour
as it is directly related with the protein content,
digestibility, N-balance as well as the cost. Fine
flour costs more due to uniform particle size as
compared to the branded flour (Majzoobi et al.,
2013). Sometimes milling of wheat in not done
efficiently which has a direct impact on the quality
as well as the cost of flour. Such inefficiencies arise
due to inability to produce uniform grinding of the
wheat grains and the time taken to crush the material
to the required size of the screen as in the mill. The
grade of grinding depends on the fineness within
each mill. The size of flour must be in the range of
250 µm and 360 µm to achieve high digestibility
from the cooked product (Yawatkar, 2010).
Laurinen et al. (2000) studied the digestibility of
all cereal grains and studied that finely ground
cereals are dusty and they may induce respiratory
diseases. Moreover, small grist size is one of the
main causes of gastric lesions. They concluded that
the particle size of wheat flour of less than 150 µm
and larger than 350 µm adversely affects its protein
contents as well as its digestibility. Potkins et al.
(1989) and Alaviuhkola et al. (1993) reported that
coarse grinding of wheat flour having size more than
350 µm and less than 150 µm may impair essential
nutrients like proteins. Sauer et al. (1977) studied
that flour type and practical size have direct
correlation with the protein content of flour.
Nawaigwe et al. (2012) reported that finely ground
wheat flour is best for making biscuits, breads and
standard bakery cakes with high protein contents as
compared to coarsely ground and branded wheat
flour.
The aim of the experiments was to analyse the
particle size of the two main types of wheat flours
(i.e. fine and branded) used in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
and to see the effect of the analysed particle sizes on
the protein content of each flour type.
108 Hanif et al., 2014. Sci. Tech. and Dev. 33 (3): 107-109
Materials and Methods
Sieve analysis: Retsch Vibratory Sieve Shaker
AS450 basic with 9 pans and a range of 20 µm to 25
mm with capacity of 3 kg was used in the
experiment. The analysis was done following the
procedure reported by AACC (2000).
Fineness modulus: It is defined as an empirical
figure obtained by adding the total percentage of the
sample of an aggregate retained on each of a
specified series of sieves, and dividing the sum by
100. The smaller the value of FM indicates the finer
size of grind of a material. FM for each flour sample
is calculated using the formula given by Ramappa et
al. (2010).
Experimental procedure: The two main flour
samples were collected from more than ten different
commercial flour mill bags available in the local
market. Both the flour types give 8 samples of
different practical size, divided into fractions,
ranging from 63-100, 100-250, 250-350 and larger
than 350 µm. All the eight samples were digested,
using sulphuric acid (concentrated, 95–98% ) with
catalyst and the nitrogen contained in the sample
was converted to ammonia; ammonium sulphate
being formed which was analysed, using Kjeldahl
method by Kjeltec 1002 apparatus following the
procedure of AOAC given by Williams (1984) to
find the crude proteins in each sample.
Statistical analysis: All the samples were taken as
treatments with flour type as a major factor and
flour size as a minor factor. Analysis of variance test
was applied to find out whether the data was
significantly different from each other or not. Mean
comparison was done after ANOVA test using
Duncan’s Multiple Range Test.
Results and Discussion
Particle size distribution
The granulometry profile of both the main flour
types is given in Table 1. Most of the particle sizes
lie in the range of 100 to 250 µm. Almost 70% of
the branded and 66% of fine flour lies in this range.
This shows that most of the flour of each type of
each mill has 60-70% flour size in the range of 100-
250µm. The results of particle size distribution are
in accordance with the sizes used in experiments by
Chiotelli and Meste (2002), Ramappa et al. (2010),
Blanchard et al. (2012) and Justin (2012).
The impact of type and particle size on the
protein content of both the flour types is shown in
Table 2. The analysis of variance showed that
protein content was significantly affected by particle
size distribution. The protein contents in both the
flour fractions differed as a function of the particle
size range. The smaller the size of particle, the lower
was the protein content of that flour. More proteins
at average of 11.8% were recorded in fine flour as
compared to 11.3% recorded in branded wheat flour.
Compared to other fractions, the lowest protein
content as a total was observed in flours with
particle size 63 µm. There was a total of 31.1%
decrease recorded in proteins in branded flour when
its size reduced from 350 µm to 63 µm. Similarly
31.9% decrease was recorded in fine flour. These
results are in accordance with the findings of
Blanchard et al. (2012) who reported that wheat
flour with particle size smaller than 50 µm had
minimal proteins in it. The results are also in
agreement with those of Chiotelli and Meste (2002),
who reported that flour size smaller than 250 µm
resulted in significant decrease of protein content of
Table. 1. Granulometry profile of both flour types.
Sieve size
(µm)
Cumulative percent retained
Reported percent passing
Branded flour
Fine flour
Branded flour
Fine flour
350
22.5
18.6
77.5
81.4
250
27.2
33.9
50.3
47.5
100
42.7
35.4
7.6
12.1
63
6.2
13.8
1.4
17.9
Pan
1.1
18.6
0
0
Modulus of finesse for fine wheat flour = 2.7 and for branded wheat flour = 3.5
Table. 2. Impact of type and particle size on the protein content of wheat flour.
Particle size (µm)
Protein (%)
CD (%)
Branded flour
Fine flour
350
13.2a
14.1a
6.3
250
12.3b
12.7b
3.1
100
10.7b
10.8c
0.9
63
9.1c
9.6c
5.2
Mean
11.3b
11.8a
LSD = 0.13
Hanif et al., 2014. Sci. Tech. and Dev. 33 (3): 107-109
109
dough. Curic et al. (2002) also reported the same
results that particle size lower than 250 µm reduced
Gluten (protein) content of wheat flour. Majzoobi et
al. (2013) reported that good quality proteins like
albumin and globulins were destroyed due to
reduction in the particle size. Decreasing the size of
wheat flour directly decrease the proteins in it so it
is recommended for wheat flour to have particle size
within range of 450-750 µm.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The study concluded that wheat flour with
particle size lower than 350-250 µm has
significantly lost its protein content. Fine wheat
flour was found to have higher proteins than
branded flour. It is, therefore, recommended to grind
wheat in such a way that the particle size remains in
the range of 350-250 µm otherwise significant
protein loss would occur on grinding to very fine
size.
References
Alaviuhkola, T., M. Hautala, K. Suomi, J.
Vuorenmaa. 1993. Effect of barley grinding
method and sodium polyacrylate supplement in
the diet on the performance and stomach ulcer
development of growing finishing pigs. Agric.
Sci. in Finland. 1: 481-487.
AACC. 2000. American Association of Cereal
Chemists Approved Methods. 10th Edition.
American Association of Cereal Chemists, St.
Paul, Minnesota. USA.
Blanchard. C., H. Labouré, A. Verel and D.
Champion. 2012. Study of the impact of wheat
flour type, flour particle size and protein content
in a cake-like dough: Proton mobility and
rheological properties assessment. Cereal Sci.
56: 691-698.
Banu, I., I. Vasilean, O.E. Constantin and I. Aprodu.
2011. Prediction of rye dough behavior and
bread quality using response surface
methodology. Irish J. Agric. and Food Res. 50:
239–247.
Chiotelli, E. and L.E. Meste. 2002. Effect of small
and large wheat starch granules on Thermo
mechanical behavior of starch. Cereal Chem.
79: 286-293.
Curic, D., D. Karlovic, D. Tusak, B. Petrovic and J.
Dugum. 2001. Gluten as a standard of wheat
flour quality. Food Tech. and Biotech. 39: 353-
361.
Dorosh, P. and A. Salam. 2008. Wheat markets and
price stabilization in Pakistan: An analysis of
policy options. The Pak. Dev. Rev. 47: 71–87.
Justin, B.T. 2012. Whole wheat flour milling:
effects of variety and particle size. MS Thesis.
Department of Food Science. Kansas State
University, Manhattan, Kansas. USA.
Laurinen, P., H. Siljander-Rasi, J. Karhunen, T.
Alaviuhkola, M. NaÈsi and K. Tuppi. 2000.
Effect of different grinding methods and particle
size of barley and wheat on pig performance and
digestibility. Animal Feed Sci. and Tech. 83: 1-
16.
Majzoobi. M., A. Farahnaky, Z. Nematolahi, M. M.
Hashemi and M.J.T. Ardakani. 2013. Effect of
different levels and particle sizes of wheat bran
on the quality of flat bread. J. Agric. Sci. and
Tech. 15: 115-123.
Nwaigwe, K.N., C. Nzediegwu and P.E. Ugwuoke.
2012. Design, construction and performance
evaluation of a modified cassava milling
machine. Res. J. App. Sci. Engg. and Tech. 18:
3354-3362.
Potkins, Z.V., T.L.J. Lawrence and J.R.
Thomlinson. 1989. Oesophagogastric
parakeratosis in the growing pig, effects of the
physical form of barley-based diets and added
fiber. Res. Vet. Sci. 47: 60-67.
Ramappa, K.T., S.B. Batagurki, A.V. Karegoudar
and H. Shranakumar. 2010. Study on milling
techniques for finger millets (Eleusine
coracana). Int. J. Agric. Engg. 4: 37-44.
Sauer, W.C., S.C. Stothers and G.D. Philips. 1977.
Apparent availabilities of amino acids in corn,
wheat and barley for growing pigs. Can. J.
Animal Sci. 57: 581-597.
Williams, S. 1984. Official methods of analysis.
Association of Official Analytical Chemists
(AOAC). Inc., Arlington, Virginia. USA.
Yawatkar, A.P., P.A. Unde and A.P. Patil. 2010.
Effect of grinding mills on quality of bajra
(millet) flour and its products. Int. J. Agric.
Engg. 3: 144-146.