Development of Real Time RT-PCR Assays for Detection of Type A Influenza Virus and for Subtyping of Avian H5 and H7 Hemagglutinin Subtypes

Department of Public Health and Microbiology, Virology Unit, University of Turin, Via Santena 9, 10126, Torino, Italy.
Molecular Biotechnology (Impact Factor: 1.88). 09/2009; 44(1):41-50. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-009-9211-7
Source: PubMed


Rapid detection and subtyping of H5 and H7 subtypes influenza A viruses are important for disease control in poultry and potential transmission to humans. Currently, virus isolation and subsequent HA and NA subtyping constitute the standard for avian influenza viruses detection and subtype identification. These methods are highly accurate and sensitive but are also laborious and time-consuming. Reverse transcription PCR and real time reverse transcription PCR assays, suitable tests for rapid detection, have previously been used for the specific diagnosis of H5 and H7 viruses, however, at present, no primer and probe sets are available for the identification of all H5 and H7 strains. Herein, we have developed specific and sensitive real time reverse transcription PCR assays for the detection of type A influenza virus and for subtyping of avian H5 and H7 hemagglutinin subtypes and we have also compared these molecular assays with viral isolation in terms of sensitivity. Our results demonstrate that the real time reverse transcription PCR assays are more sensitive, specific, less expensive compared to viral isolation. In conclusion, molecular assays could represent an useful tool for rapid detection and screening of H5 and H7 isolates during influenza A virus outbreaks alternatively to viral isolation.

Download full-text


Available from: Maria Lucia Mandola, Jan 08, 2014
    • "Nucleic-acid amplification-based detection is currently the standard diagnostic methodology in many hospitals. The main advantages are high sensitivity and specificity [8]. In addition to the ability to quantify the number of viruses using real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), isolation of nucleic acids also allows additional analyses , such as sequencing, to gather information on sensitivity to anti-viral treatment and on the origin of the virus, which is important for outbreak management. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Novel viral diagnostic tools need to be affordable, fast, accurate and easy to use with sensitivity and specificity equivalent or superior to current standards. At present, viral diagnostics are based on direct detection of viral components or indirect detection by measuring antibodies generated in response to viral infection. While sensitivity of detection and quantification are still important challenges, we expect major advances from new assay formats and synthetic binding molecules, such as aptamers. Compared to traditional antibody-based detection, aptamers could provide faster adaptation to continuously evolving virus strains and higher discriminating capacity between specific virus serotypes. Aptamers are very stable and easily modifiable, so are ideal molecules for detection and chemical sensing applications. Here, we review the use of aptasensors for detection of viral pathogens and consider the feasibility of aptasensors to become standard devices for point-of-care diagnostics of viruses.
    No preview · Article · Oct 2015 · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry
  • Source
    • "The R2 index for AIV and NDV genes was 0.998 and 0.997, respectively. As the slope of the standard curves of AIV and NDV were 3.046 and 3.220 respectively, the efficiency of the reaction defined by 10(−1/slope) were 2.13 and 2.04, which were within the acceptable range of 1.7 to 2.2 [19]. According to the standard curve, the linear equation for the real-time RT-PCR for AIV and NDV was y = −3.046x "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Simultaneous and sequential allantoic cavity inoculations of Specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chicken eggs with Influenza virus (AIV) and Newcastle disease virus (NDV) demonstrated that the interaction of AIV and NDV during co-infection was variable. Our research revisited the replication interference potential of AIV and NDV using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (real-time RT-PCR) for AIV and NDV to specifically detect the viral genomes in mixed infections. Data from this survey showed that when different doses of NDV (Lasota or F48E8) and AIV (F98 or H5N1) were simultaneously inoculated into embryonating chicken eggs (ECE), interference with the growth of NDV occurred, while interference with the growth of AIV did not occur. When equal amount of the two viruses were sequentially employed, the degree of interference was dependent upon the time of superinfection and the virulence of virus. AIV have a negative impact on NDV growth if they are inoculated simultaneously or sequentially and that the degree of interference depended upon the quantity and relative virulence of the virus strains used; however, interference with AIV was not observed. Only if NDV were inoculated at an earlier time will NDV able to interfere with the growth of AIV.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2012 · Virology Journal
  • Source
    • "Current testing stratagems rely on conserved nucleotide sequences for the primers. However, the variability in the HA and NA genes in avian influenzas have resulted in the design of multiple wobble primers to detect one subtype of influenza A without crossreactivity with other HA and NA subtypes (Sidoti et al. 2010; Starick et al. 2000; Suarez et al. 2007). The avian influenza primers can be used for subtyping influenza viruses from swine or new subtyping primers can be designed using published sequences (He 2009; Huang et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2008; Nagarajan et al. 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Collective knowledge regarding the occurrence of influenza among swine is incomplete due to inconsistent surveillance of swine populations. In this chapter, we review what surveillance activities exist and some of the practical challenges encountered. Furthermore, to support robust surveillance activities, accurate laboratory assays are needed for the detection of the virus and viral nucleic acids within clinical samples, or for antiviral antibodies in serum samples. The most common influenza diagnostic assays used for swine are explained and their use as surveillance tools evaluated.
    Full-text · Article · May 2012 · Current topics in microbiology and immunology
Show more