Content uploaded by Štefan Týr
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Štefan Týr on Sep 22, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2), 2012
118
MILK THISTLE (SILYBUM MARIANUM (L.) GAERTN.) AS A WEED IN
SUSTAINABLE CROP ROTATION
T. VEREŠ, Š. TÝR
Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra, Slovak Republic
Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources,
Slovak Agricultural University in Nitra,
Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovak Republic,
E-mail: Tomas.Veres@uniag.sk
Abstract: Milk thistle – Silybum marianum (L.)
Gaertn. can be a winter annual or a biennial
medicinal plant. The assessment of the occurrence
of milk thistle in sustainable crop rotation was
conducted at the Experimental Base of Faculty of
Agrobiology and Food Resources, SUA in Nitra in
the years 2008- 2011. This study was focused on
milk thistle as a weed in the sustainable farming
system with the crop rotation of maize for grain,
pea for grain, durum wheat and milk thistle. An
actual weed infestation of maize, pea and durum
wheat stands with milk thistle was evaluated before
preemergence application of herbicides, in the
spring time. Second screening of actual weed
infestation of all stands in sustainable crop rotation
with milk thistle was done before crops harvest.
Screening of each field was made on 1 m2 area with
three replications. The three randomly established
sample quadrants were situated minimally 10 m
from field margin and apart from each other,
respectively. The level of infestation was evaluated
according to average density of weeds per square
meter. Obtained data was statistically analyzed by
Statistica 7.0, ANOVA, LSD test (p=0.05). As a
plant from the family Asteraceae has a great
anticipation to have vital seeds in soil profile for
long time as well as Helianthus annus. On the base
of our 4 vegetation periods research, we can
conclude that the S. marianum seeds are vital in
soil profile for three and more years. We can also
conclude that in third year after milk thistle
cropping was no infestation of durum wheat, but S.
marianum germinate after the harvest of durum
wheat at the stubbles in August or September.
According to statistical analyses in the year 2010
was the maize stands infested with the highest,
statistically very significant amount of Silybum
marianum (7 plants per m2). Stands of pea for
grain in the second year after milk thistle cropping
were infested in the years 2008-2010 only with 0.33
plants per m2. Durum wheat stands were not
infested with milk thistle. In the spring time the
infestation of maize for grain, pea for grain and
durum wheat stands with milk thistle falled very
significantly down from 17.78 plant pre m2 in
maize stand to 2.56 plant pre m2 in durum wheat
stand. The originality of this paper is in the
examination of new perspective crop in sustainable
farming systems and in evaluating of its weed
potential.
Key words: weed infestation, Sylibum marianum L. Geartn., sustainable crop rotation
INTRODUCTION
Milk thistle (Silybum marianum [L.] Gaertn.) can be a winter annual or a biennial herb
(YOUNG et al., 1978; AUSTIN et al., 1988; GROVES, KAYE 1989). Its current distribution
includes most temperatures areas of the world (CHAMBREAU, MACLAREN, 2007). It is a broad-
leaved species belonging to Asteraceae that reaches a height of 200-250 cm (OMIDBAIGI,
NOBAKHT, 2001). Milk thistle is grown commercially as a medicinal plant in Europe, Egypt,
China and Argentina but it has been reported as a noxious weed in many other countries
(KHAN et al., 2009).
Milk thistle is a medicinal plant cultivated in agriculture. It is the most researched
plant for the treatment of liver disease. The achenes, i.e. fruits of the plant, are commonly used
as a medicinal drug; they are the raw material for isolation of different substances with liver-
protection activity. Its therapeutic properties are due to the presence of silymarin. The seeds
Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2), 2012
119
contain the highest amount of silymarin, but the whole plant is used medicinally. Milk thistle is
grown successfully on a range of soil types, from sandy soils to much heavier clay soils. Milk
thistle is directly seeded in soils. Sowing occurs in autumn and spring, and row spacing is
usually 40 – 75 cm, with 20 – 30 cm between plants in the row. Nutrient requirements of this
crop are low to moderate since it is adapted to poor quality soils and many different growing
conditions. Milk thistle is good forecrop for maize in sustainable agricultural system. A
limiting factor in milk thistle production is weed interference. Pendimethalin and metribuzin
herbicides are safe for weed control in milk thistle, both alone and in combination. Milk thistle
is considered drought resistant and normal rainfall will often suffice. In a Mediterranean
environment, under severe drought conditions, the crops should be irrigated during seed
growth and filling. Moreover, a few varieties of milk thistle have been developed (CARRUBBA
et al., 1987; HABÁN et al., 2009; KARKANIS et al., 2011; MACÁK et al., 2007).
It is considered to be ruderal, or weedy, in its native range, is found in dense stands
along roadsides and waste areas, and it prefers fertile soils (GABAY et al., 1994).
In this study we focused on milk thistle as a weed in the sustainable farming system
with the crop rotation of maize for grain, pea for grain, durum wheat and milk thistle.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
The assessment of Silybum marianum (L.) Geartn occurrence in sustainable crop
rotation (Table 1) was conducted at the Experimental Base of Faculty of Agrobiology and food
resources, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra in the years 2008- 2011. Experimental
base is situated in cadastre of Dolná Malanta village near Nitra, Slovakia (18°07'E, 48°19'N).
Geographically, this locality is situated in the western part of the river Žitava upland. The
experimental locality has flat character with little declination to south. The altitude is 177 – 180
m above sea level (Hanes et al., 1993).
The weed mapping was realized in the framework of agri-climatic areas in the
territory with the following features: Macro area: warm with the sum of temperature during
days when t > 10°C in a range of 3,100 – 2,400°C; Area: predominantly warm with
temperature t > 15°C in a range of 3,000 – 2,800°C; Sub area: very dry with climatic humidity
factor for the months June–August KVI – VIII = 150 mm; Ward: predominantly mild winter
with the average of absolute temperature minimum Tmin. = from – 18 to – 21°C. The average
annual temperature in 2004 was 10.0°C, in 2005: 9.6°C, in 2006: 10.1°C, and in 2007: 11.4°C.
The sum of annual precipitations was: in 2004: 514.5 mm, in 2005: 633.0 mm, in 2006: 507.0
mm, and in 2007: 606.4 mm. The average long – term (1961–1990) annual precipitation is
532.5 mm, for the vegetation period it is 309.4 mm. The average long – term (1961 – 1990)
annual temperature is 9.8°C and for the vegetation period it is 16.4°C (Špánik et al., 1996).
Type of the soil is brown soil; selected soil properties were: proportional soil weight 2.60 –
2.63 t.m-3 content of humus in arable soil/topsoil 1.95 – 2.28%; soil reaction 5.03 – 5.69
(acidic, almost mild acidic). The experimental soil was created at the proluvial sediments. The
soil profile of brown soil contains three genetic horizons (Ap, Bt, C). Their stratography is
following: humus horizon (Ap) with the depth of 0–0.32 m; underneath is the main diagnostic
luvisolic horizon (Bt), which was created as a result of alluvial accumulation of translocated
colloids, and whose depth is from 0.33 to 0.65 m; then, there is a transitional horizon (Bt/C)
with the depth from 0.66 to 0.85 m followed continually with the soil forming substrate up to
the depth of 1.5 m. The studied brown soil is clayey in its sub – layer and in its topsoil is
mildly firm. Humus is of a humo – phulvate type (HANES et al., 1993).
An actual weed infestation of maize, peas and durum wheat stands with milk thistle
was evaluated before preemergence application of herbicides, in the spring time. Second
screening of actual weed infestation of all stands in sustainable crop rotation with milk thistle
Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2), 2012
120
was done before crops harvest. Screening of each field was made on 1 m2 area with three
replications. The three randomly established sample quadrants were situated minimally 10 m
from field margin and apart from each other, respectively. The level of infestation was
evaluated according to average density of weeds per square meter (Table 2). Obtained data was
statistically analyzed by Statistica 7.0, analysis of variance (ANOVA), LSD test (p=0.05).
Table 1
Sustainable crop rotation on the Experimental Base Dolná Malanta
2008 2009 2010 2011
Pea for grain Durum Wheat Milk Thistle Maize for grain
Maize for grain Pea for grain Durum Wheat Milk Thistle
Milk Thistle Maize for grain Pea for grain Durum Wheat
Durum Wheat Milk Thistle Maize for grain Pea for grain
Table 2
Evaluation scale of actual weed infestation
Actual weed infestation
none weak low medium heavy
Infestation level
0 1 2 3 4
Group of weeds*
Number of weeds per m2
Excessively dangerous - 2 3-5 6-15 ≥ 16
Less dangerous - 4 5-8 9-20 ≥ 21
Less important - 8 9-15 16-30 ≥ 31
*- weed species checklist Hron-Vodák, 1959, modified by authors Smatana-Týr, 2011.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Milk thistle (Sylibum marianum L. Gaertn.) was in sustainable crop rotation the
forecrop for maize for grain. Because of this the highest infestation with S. marianum was
determined in maize for grain stands. The amount of Sylibum marianum seeds in the soil seed
bank fall statistically significantly down during the planting of cultural crops in the second and
third year after milk thistle (Table 3). Table 3
Number of Sylibum marianum (L.) Gaertn. plants per m2 in sustainable crop rotation in the spring time in
three different crops (LSD test, p=0.05)
Crop Number of SYLMA plants per m2 in the spring time
Maize for grain 17.78 C
Pea for grain 8.11 B
Durum Wheat 2.56 A
The highest amount of Sylibum marianum weeds before harvest was statistically very
significant in the year 2010 and in maize for grain stand (table 4; table 5).
Table 4
Number of Sylibum marianum (L.) Gaertn. plants per m2 in sustainable crop rotation before harvest in the
years 2008-2010 (LSD test, p=0.05)
Year Number of SYLMA plants per m2 before harvest
2008 0.9 A
2009 0.9 A
2010 2.5 B
Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2), 2012
121
Table 5
Number of Sylibum marianum (L.) Gaertn. plants per m2 in sustainable crop rotation before harvest in
different crops (LSD test, p=0.05)
Crop Number of SYLMA plants per m2 before harvest
Maize for grain 3.89 B
Pea for grain 0.33 A
Durum Wheat 0 A
According to statistical analyses (Table 6) in the year 2010 was the maize stands
infested with the highest statistically very significant amount of S. marianum (7 plants per m2).
Stands of pea for grain in the second year after milk thistle cropping were infested in the years
2008-2010 only with 0.33 plants per m2. Durum wheat stands were not infested with Sylibum
marianum. Table 6
Interaction between year and crop affected by number of Sylibum marianum (L.) Gaertn. plants per m2 in
sustainable crop rotation before harvest in different crops (LSD test, p=0.05)
Number of SYLMA plants per m2 before harvest 2008 2009 2010
Maize for grain 2.33 B 2.33 B 7.0 C
Pea for grain 0.33 A 0.33 A 0.33 A
Durum Wheat 0 A 0 A 0 A
Silybum marianum is not only cultivated crop which suffer from crop – weed
competition but Sylibum marianum is also important weed of grains (winter wheat) (MARTWAT
et al., 2007). It’s a serious weed in many areas of North and South America, Africa, Australia,
Asia and Middle East (HOLM et al., 1997). It can be found as a garden ornamental and shows
up in flower and vegetable seed packets. Once milk thistle has found a niche, it is a competitive
thistle and tends to establish in tall dense patches that eliminate other plant species, either by
shading or by competition for water and nutrients (BERNER et al., 2002).
CONCLUSIONS
Milk thistle (Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn.) was ranged into sustainable crop rotation,
because of integrated soil management and economical rentability of its cropping. S. marianum as
medicinal plant is used in pharmacy for silymarin isolation from its fruits. But the cropping of milk thistle
has several disadvantages: the first is its morphological characteristics (it can heart skin through its
thistles), the second is that milk thistle has potential to become serious weed in arable land.
As a plant from the family Asteraceae has a great anticipation to have vital seeds in soil profile
for long time as well as Helianthus annus L.. On the base of our 4 vegetation periods research, we can
conclude that the S. marianum seeds are vital in soil profile for three and more years. We can also
conclude that in third year after milk thistle cropping was no infestation of durum wheat stands, but S.
marianum plants germinate after the harvest of durum wheat at the stubbles in August or September. On
the base of statistical analyses we concluded that: the very significant highest infestation with S.
marianum was in maize for grain stand in the year 2010. In the spring time the infestation of maize for
grain, pea for grain and durum wheat stands with milk thistle falled very significantly down from 17.78
plant pre m2 in maize stand to 2.56 plant pre m2 in durum wheat stand.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This paper was supported by VEGA project no. 1/0513/12: „Research of sustainable
agroecosystems for mitigation of climate change, production of bioproducts, improvement of human
nutritional and health parameters“.
Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 44 (2), 2012
122
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. AUSTIN, M.P.; FRESCO, L.F.M.; NICHOLLS, A.O.: GROVES, R.H.; KAYE, P.E.: Competition and relative
yield estimation and interpretation at different densities and under various nutrient
concentrations using Silybum marianum and Cirsium vulgare. In: J. Ecol., vol. 3,
1988, pp. 157-171.
2. BERNER, D.K.; PAXON, L.K.; BRUCKART, W.L.; LUSTER, D.G.; MCMAHON, M.B.; MICHAEL, J.L.: First
report of Silybum marianum as a host of Puccinia punctiformis. In: Plant Dis., vol. 86,
2002, p. 1271.
3. CARRUBBA, A.; LA TORRE, R.: Cultivation trials of milk thistle (Silybum marianum Gaertn.) into the
semiarid Mediterranean environment. In: Agricoltura mediterranea, vol. 133, no. 1,
1987, pp. 14-19, ISSN 0394-0438.
4. CHAMBREAU, D.; MACLAREN, P.A.: Got milk thistle? An adaptive managment approach to eradicating
milk thistle on dairies in King county, Washington state. In: Meeting the Challenge:
Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Ecosystems, 2007, pp. 83-84.
5. GABAY, R.; PLITMANN, U.; DANIN, A.: Factors affecting the dominance of Sylibum marianum L.
(Asteraceae) in its specific habitats. In: Flora, vol. 189, 1994, pp. 201-206.
6. GROVES, R.H.; KAYE, P.E.: Germination and phenology of seven introduced thistle species in Southern
Australia. In: Aust. J. Bot., vol. 37, 1989, pp. 351-359.
7. HABÁN, M.; OTEPKA, P.; KOBIDA, Ľ.; HABÁNOVÁ, M.: Production and quality of milk thistle (Silybum
marianum [L.] Gaertn.) cultivated in cultural conditions of warm agri-climatic
macroregion. In: Hort. Sci. (Prague), vol. 39, no. 2, 2009, pp. 25-30.
8. HANES, J.; MUCHA, V.; SISÁK, P.; SLOVÍK, R.: Charakteristika hnedozemnej pôdy na výskumno-
experimentálnej báze AF VŠP Nitra, Dolná Malanta. VES VŠP: Nitra, 1993, pp. 49.
9. HOLM, L.G.; DOLL, J.; HOLM, E.; PANCHO, J.; HERBERGER, J.: World weeds. In: Natural Histories and
Distribution, Wiley, New York, 1997.
10. KARKANIS, A.; BILALIS, D.; EFTHIMIADOU, A.: Cultivation of milk thistle (Silybum marianum L.
Gaertn.), a medicinal weed. In: Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 34, no. 1, 2011, pp.
825-830.
11. KHAN, M.A.; BLACKSHAW, R.E.; MARWAT, K.B.: Biology of milk thistle (Sylibum marianum) and
management options for growers in north-western Pakistan. In: Weed Biology and
Management, vol. 9, 2009, pp. 99-105.
12. MACÁK, M.; DEMJANOVÁ, E.; HUNKOVÁ, E.: Forecrop value of milk thistle (Silybum marianum [L.]
Gaertn.) in sustainable crop rotation. In: 1st International Scientific Conference on
Medicinal, Aromatic and Spice Plants (Book of Scientific Papers and Abstracts).
Nitra, Slovak University of Agriculture, 2007, pp. 102–104.
13. MARWAT, K.B.; KHAN, M.A.: Climatic variation and growth of holy thistle (SILYBUM MARIANUM
GAERTN.). In: Pak. J. Botany, vol. 39, no. 2, 2007, pp. 319-327.
14. OMIDBAIGI, R.; NOBAKHT, A.: Nitrogen fertilizer affecting growth, seed yield and active substances of
milk thistle (Sylibum marianum). In: Pak. J. Biol. Sci., vol. 4, 2001, pp. 1345-1349.
15. SMATANA, J.; TÝR, Š.: Základy herbológie. 1. vyd. Nitra : Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita,
2011. 125 s. ISBN 978-80-552-0579-3.
16. ŠPÁNIK, F.; REPA, Š.; ŠISKA, B.: Klimatické a fenologické pomery Nitry (1961–1990). Nitra,
Vydavateľské a edičné stredisko Slovenskej poľnohospodárskej univerzity: 62 p..
17. YOUNG, J.A.; EVANS, R.A.; HAWKES, R.B.: Milk thistle (Silybum marianum) seed germination. In:
Weed Science, vol. 26, 1978, pp. 395-398.