We Can Work It Out: Age Differences in Relational Pronouns, Physiology, and Behavior in Marital Conflict

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-5050, USA.
Psychology and Aging (Impact Factor: 2.73). 10/2009; 24(3):604-13. DOI: 10.1037/a0016950
Source: PubMed


This study examined the relationship that personal pronouns spoken during a marital conversation have with the emotional qualities of those interactions and with marital satisfaction. Middle-aged and older couples (N = 154) engaged in a 15-min conflict conversation during which physiology and emotional behavior were continuously monitored. Verbatim transcripts of the conversations were coded into 2 lexical categories: (a) we-ness (we-words), pronouns that focus on the couple; (b) separateness (me/you-words), pronouns that focus on the individual spouses. Analyses revealed that greater we-ness was associated with a number of desirable qualities of the interaction (lower cardiovascular arousal, more positive and less negative emotional behavior), whereas greater separateness was associated with a less desirable profile (more negative emotional behavior, lower marital satisfaction). In terms of age differences, older couples used more we-ness words than did middle-aged couples. Further, the associations between separateness and marital satisfaction were strongest for older wives. These findings indicate that the emotional aspects of marital quality are expressed in the natural language of couples engaged in conversation.

Download full-text


Available from: Gilad Hirschberger
  • Source
    • "The scripts were randomized. A composite score that combines all three physiological measures was computed (Seider et al., 2009). The composite score and the individual physiological measures were used as dependent variables in the data analyses. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study used psychophysiological measures to validate Chapman’s Five Love Languages theory. Physiological responses (skin conductance, heart rate, and respiration rate) were recorded while 89 participants listened to recorded guided imagery scripts that each represented one of the love languages (LL). Researchers were able to identify a primary LL for each participant. A composite score of the physiological responses indicated a significant increase in arousal for when participants listened to their primary LL.
    Full-text · Conference Paper · Mar 2015
  • Source
    • "" We-ness, " refl ected by 1st person plural pronouns, however, should probably not be considered in isolation from pronouns refl ecting a sense of " me " or " I " in the relationship, or 1st person singular pronouns. The two types of pronouns seem to refl ect distinct viewpoints within a relationship (e.g., sharing only 3 % of variance; Seider et al., 2009 ). In one part of a larger study, for example, Seider and colleagues ( 2009 ) asked middle-aged and older married couples to complete marital satisfaction inventories, and engage in a video-taped 15-min conversation about a mutually agreed upon topic of confl ict in their marriage. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Relationship-defining memories represent enduring themes in a marriage and can provide insight in to marital satisfaction (Alea & Vick, 2010). The purpose of the study presented in this chapter was to examine whether “we-ness,” compared to “I-ness,” expressed in positive and negative relationship-defining memories, were linked to martial satisfaction. Men nand women nin long-term marital relationships wrote about their mostdefining positive and negative relationship events. First-person plural (“we-ness”) and singular(“I-ness”) pronouns expressed in the narratives were counted. “We-ness” was less likely to be expressed in negative compared to positive memories. “We-ness”in negative relationship-defining memories was associated with higher martial satisfaction. The effect was particularly for women, who also had a positive association between “we-ness” in positive memories and marital satisfaction. The discussion highlights the role of relationship-defining memories, and “we-ness,” in exploring resiliency in marriage and clinical work with couples.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2015
  • Source
    • "Relationship stories that involved a high degree of intimacy-related content and positive affect were hypothesized to be indicative of relationship quality in the form of heightened relationship satisfaction and closeness, and low levels of conflict and break-up thoughts, as well as mental health, in the form of low levels of depression and high levels of psychological well-being. Furthermore, although research has established the predictive abilities of narrative and linguistic aspects of stories (e.g., Seider et al., 2009; Slatcher et al., 2008), no studies have examined whether both are equally robust in predicting relationship quality and mental health. In other words, research has yet to determine which qualities of relationship stories matter most in explaining elements of relationship quality and mental health. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examined how the narrative construction of intimacy and affect in relationship stories predicted individuals’ relationship quality, stability, and mental health. A purposive national sample of 150 individuals in long-term relationships wrote stories about four key relationship events and completed measures of relationship quality and mental health. Stories were analyzed for narrative and linguistic indicators of intimacy-related and affective content. Intimacy-related content was positively associated with relationship quality and mental health. Linguistically-coded affect was not associated with any outcomes. The most robust predictor of relationship quality and mental health was the narratively constructed affective tone of relationship story endings. The narrative construction of positive story endings significantly increased the likelihood of participants remaining together with their partners over time.
    Full-text · Article · May 2013 · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
Show more