ArticlePDF Available

Importance of Brand Personality To Customer Loyalty: A Conceptual Study

Authors:
  • ICCMRT, Lucknow

Abstract and Figures

Customer loyalty is viewed as the strengths of the relationship between an individual's relative attitude and repeat patronage. Here an attempt has been made to probe into the behaviour of a customers' willingness to buy a brand/product, of what are the related factors which influences his buying behaviour and attitude towards the brand. An investigation is done to highlight a point of what are the influencing factors which compels him to be a loyal for a brand. The theoretical study and the conceptual model, here, envisages the concept of brand loyalty by passing through the concept of brand personality. The study findings suggest a conceptual model that combines the theories of brand personality with the necessary dispositional variables to explain the customer's loyalty processes. This model also rises to the marketing challenge of building long-term consumer relationships. Customer's loyalty, therefore, might be strengthened or retained by keeping in consideration various other factors through communicating a good brand relationship by involving the concept of brand personality, thus, enhancing the customer relationship building with social and resource exchanges and thus positively affecting the satisfaction of the customer. The theoretical framework will help the researches to further investigate into the concept of brand personality enhancing the customer loyalty.
Content may be subject to copyright.
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
4 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
Importance of Brand Personality To Customer Loyalty: A
Conceptual Study
Reshma Farhat1* Dr. Bilal Mustafa Khan2
1.Department of Business Administration, Aligarh Muslim university (AMU), PO box 202002, Aligarh,
Uttar Pradesh, India
2.Department of Business Administration, Aligarh Muslim university (AMU), PO box 202002, Aligarh,
Uttar Pradesh, India
* E-mail of the corresponding author: reshma.farhat2010@gmail.com
Abstract
Customer loyalty is viewed as the strengths of the relationship between an individual’s relative attitude
and repeat patronage. Here an attempt has been made to probe into the behaviour of a customers’
willingness to buy a brand/product, of what are the related factors which influences his buying
behaviour and attitude towards the brand. An investigation is done to highlight a point of what are the
influencing factors which compels him to be a loyal for a brand. The theoretical study and the
conceptual model, here, envisages the concept of brand loyalty by passing through the concept of brand
personality. The study findings suggest a conceptual model that combines the theories of brand
personality with the necessary dispositional variables to explain the customer’s loyalty processes. This
model also rises to the marketing challenge of building long-term consumer relationships. Customer’s
loyalty, therefore, might be strengthened or retained by keeping in consideration various other factors
through communicating a good brand relationship by involving the concept of brand personality, thus,
enhancing the customer relationship building with social and resource exchanges and thus positively
affecting the satisfaction of the customer. The theoretical framework will help the researches to further
investigate into the concept of brand personality enhancing the customer loyalty.
Keywords: Brand Personality, Customer Loyalty, Conceptual Model
1. Introduction
In building a brand value ‘perception is more important than reality’ (Duncan and Moriarty, 1998), and
as brands only exist in the minds of customers then the management of brands is all about the
management of perceptions. The brand manager’s job is to see that satisfaction of the customer is
maintained, in terms of product performance as well as perception. In this regard, in the present
prevailing competitive scenario, brands are new business warriors and customer retention plays a vital
role so that the customers are glued to an offering on a long-term basis. Hence the success of any
strategy to attract consumers largely depends on its capability to maintain its customer retention and to
build protected enclaves of consumers.
Today brand loyalty has become a focal point of interest for marketing researchers and practitioners.
Few of the researches summarises that the loyal customers spend more than non-loyal customers, act as
advocates for a brand by engaging in positive word of mouth, and are therefore "at the heart of a
company's most valuable customer group" (Ganesh et al., 2000, p. 65; Zeithaml et al.,1996). Moreover,
many studies reveal that brand loyal customers are willing pay any prices and are less price sensitive
(see e.g. Krishnamurthi and Raj, 1991). Perhaps the marketing cost is significantly less when the brand
enjoys a large group of loyal customers. However, the literature on brand loyalty is incomplete in
several important respects.
Many of the past researches reveal that it is more profitable to follow the strategy of customer retention
than to go for new customers. Capturing new customers is expensive because of advertising promotion
and sales cost, and start-up operating expenses (Reichheld, 1996). Also, promotion is also restrained in
the presence of brand loyalty there is less need of promotion. Brand loyal customers reduce the
marketing costs of the firm as the costs of attracting a new customer have been found to be about six
time higher than the costs of retaining an old one (Rosenberg and Czepiel, 1983).
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
5 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
Firms with large groups of loyal customers have been shown to have large market shares, and market
share, in turn, has been shown to be associated with higher rates of return on investment (Buzzell et al.,
1975; Raj, 1985; Reichheld and Sasser, 1990). Hence a loyal customer allow marketers to reap the
advantage of customer retention. Loyal customers are less likely to engage in an information search
and exhibit less openness to information that extols rival offerings.
So it becomes inevitable for the brand mangers of today to probe into the context of appropriate
relationship between the constructs such as brand personality and customer loyalty. It costs less to
serve loyal customers because familiarity with the company’s products and services makes customers
less dependent on its employees for help and information. In this study we assess the relative
importance of various antecedents to customer loyalty, including brand personality. Only a few
researchers, such as Plummer (1985) and David Aaker (1996) have pointed out the importance of brand
personality in building a competitive advantage and brand loyalty. This paper presents a theoretical
framework for understanding any affect of the personality on the brand loyalty.
The conceptual study presented here will be in the interest of the academicians as well as businessmen.
Furthermore, the consequences and the research implications will help in understanding the concept of
brand personality and its role in building a positive attitude towards the brand and hence making the
brand driven customers loyal towards the brand. Beyond such identifications, this study, examines how
brand personality affects brand loyalty.
The research here has borrowed the methodology and concepts of Aaker (1997) and investigates the
importance of brand personality to customer loyalty of brand personality.
The motivation of this study is formed to:
1. To explore the concept of brand personality,
2. To study the influence of brand personality on brand loyalty,
3. To analyse the factors leading to customer loyalty.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Studies of Brand Personality
In the business world of today, every company is trying to get the attention of the customers by
creating a distinctive brand image for their products. Pepsi is often perceived by consumers as more
“young,” Coke as more “real and honest,” Dr. Pepper as more “non-conformist and fun” (Aaker 1997,
p. 348). These kinds of human characteristics associated with the brand are called “brand personality”.
Brand personality mainly comes from three sources: the first one is the association consumers have
with a brand, secondly, the image a company tries hard to create. Aaker (1997) defines brand
personality as “a set of human characteristics associated to a brand. Hence, brand personality offers
the functions of self symbolization and self-expression (Keller, 1993). Levy (1959) indicates that brand
personality contains demographic features, such as gender, age and social class, and they may be
directly influenced by the image of the brand users, personnel and product spokespersons, and
indirectly affected by product attributes as well.
The Brand Personality construct enjoys a certain consensus as an explanatory element for symbolic
consumption and the affective bonds that consumers establish with brands (Keller, 1993; J. Aaker &
Fournier, 1995; D. A. Aaker, 1996; J. Aaker, 1997; J. Aaker et al., 2004). Brand Personality is a
differentiating element in an environment of symbolic consumption (Lannon, 1993), which is presented
to the consumer as a vehicle of self expression and the expression of an ideal (Sirgy, 1982; Malhotra,
1988), and a source of personal and social meaning (Levy, 1959; Allen & Olson, 1995; J. Aaker, 1995,
1997). Brand Personality is thus a factor that influences consumer choice and preference (Biel, 1993)
and, as such, is an element that generates value for the consumer and for the company (D. A. Aaker,
1991, 1996).
Also a strong, favourable brand personality can provide consumers with emotional fulfilment, image
enhancement, an increased willingness to remain loyal to the brand, to try a new brand or brand
extension and to pay premium prices for a brand. BP can be the principle differentiation basis when
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
6 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
there is little or no distinction other than the brand (Aaker 1997, Freling & Forbes 2005b, Venable et al
2005, Chang & Chieng 2006).
2.2 Studies of Brand Loyalty
Brand Loyalty is an important concept of today’s brand marketing world. Many definitions were being
proposed by many researchers, among which the most complete definition was being proposed by
Jacoby and Olson (1970). They defined brand loyalty as the result from non-random, long existence
behaviour response, and it was a mental purchase process formed by some certain decision units who
considered more than one brands. In early researches, researchers usually took the act of repurchase as
the method of measure brand loyalty. But some researchers indicate that to measure brand loyalty the
best way is to measure by affective loyalty (Bennett and Rundle-Thiele, 2000).
Brand loyalty, in marketing, consists of a consumer's commitment to repurchase or otherwise continue
using the brand and can be demonstrated by repeated buying of a product or service or other positive
behaviours. Jacoby and Chestnut (1978) defined the concept of brand loyalty as: “The (a) biased, (b)
behavioural response, (c) expressed over time, (d) by some decision-making unit, (e) with respect to
one or more alternative brands out of a set of such brands, and (f) is a function of psychological
(decision-making, evaluation) processes”. This definition identifies six requirements of brand loyalty.
According to the study conducted by Oliver (1999), the brand loyalty was classified into four parts:
cognitive loyalty, affective loyalty, conation loyalty and action loyalty. Day (1996) added two
indicators, action and affection for brand loyalty and divided brand loyalty into true brand loyalty and
spurious brand loyalty. The spurious brand loyalty consumers may make repeated purchases only
because the brand they purchase is the only one choice in the stores. On the other hand, true brand
loyalty consumers should show both psychological and affective commitments in addition to
repurchase consistency. As shown in Figure 1, Dick and Basu (1994) classified loyalty into:
1. True loyalty.
2. Spurious loyalty.
3. Latent loyalty.
4. No loyalty.
Figure 1: Model of Loyalty
Repeat Purchase Possibility
High Low
High
Related Attitude
Low
(Source: Dick and Basu (1994, p.101))
Customer loyalty is viewed as the strength of the relationship between an individual’s relative attitude
and their repeat patronage. Kotler and Keller (2005) indicated that “based on a 20-80 principle, the top
20% of customers may create 80% of profit for a company.” Thus, the longer relationship between a
company and its customers may create more profit and benefit for the company. Studies have shown
that small reductions in customer defections can produce significant increase in profits because:
Loyal customers buy more products.
Loyal customers are less-price sensitive and pay less attention to competitors’ advertising.
True Loyalty
Latent Loyalty
Spurious Loyalty
No Loyalty
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
7 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
Servicing existing customers, who are familiar with the firm’s offerings and processes, is
cheaper.
Loyal customers spread positive word-of-mouth and refer other customers (Reichheld and
Sasser, 1990).
2.3 Relationship between Brand Personality and Brand Loyalty
Many of the studies are conducted to show the relationship between the brand personality and the
brand loyalty of the customer and the consequences have being analysed. Additionally, it is found that
by involving the concept of brand personality, the brand loyalty can be enhanced.
Guo (2003) also explored that brand personality has significant influence on brand preference.
Because brands have their own particular personalities, consumers may treat brands as real human
beings. In this case, consumers will expect the people’s words, attitudes, behavior or thoughts and so
on to meet their respective personality traits (Aaker, 1996).
It might be that consumers like the brands having more distinct brand personality, and it is also likely
that consumers are more familiar with the brands they prefer. Consumers may likely use the brand and
products in line with their own personality traits, in other words, all the marketing activities are aimed
at having consumers believe and recognize a brand personality, and reinforcing the communication
between the brand and the consumer (Govers and Schoormans, 2005), in order to enhance the brand’s
loyalty and equity.
Mengxia (2007) investigated the Influence of brand personality on consumers’ brand preference,
affection, loyalty and purchasing intention. The results of his study shows that brand personality has a
positive influence on brand preference, affection, loyalty and purchase intention. A brand personality
should be shaped to be long-lasting and consistent. Besides, it should also be different from other
brands and meet consumer’s demands (Kumar et al., 2006). Also a study conducted by Kumar et al.
(2006) sorted out the connection between brand personality and brand loyalty, and separately used
durable goods (cars), and consumer goods (tooth-pastes) to explore the relationship between brand
personality and brand loyalty. The result shows that brand personality may influence consumers’ brand
loyalty to consumable goods.
3. Research Model
Brand loyalty is always developed post purchase. To develop brand loyalty, an organization should
know their niche market, target them, support their product, ensure easy access of their product,
provide customer satisfaction, bring constant innovation in their product and offer schemes on their
product so as to ensure that customers repeatedly purchase the product. It, therefore, creates the brand
trust in the minds of the customer towards the brand.
Fig. 2: Conceptual Model
Brand Satisfaction
It is proposed in the above model that there is a linkage from perceived brand quality through customer
satisfaction to create brand loyalty. Although the extant literature reports that customer satisfaction has
stronger impact on brand loyalty than perceived brand quality. With the specific brand personality
Perceived Brand
Quality
Brand Personality
-Sincerity
-Excitement
-Competence
-Sophistication
-Ruggedness
Brand Loyalty
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
8 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
(with dimensions of Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, Ruggedness), consumers of
varying personality traits will be attracted and their brand preference will then be further developed.
The customers go for a brand which ultimately suits his personality and once the concept of personality
matches with that of the choice of the consumer, the purchase intention takes place. The impact of
creation of brand personality in the minds of the customer is seen by the repetitive buying behaviour
and perceived brand satisfaction of the customer, wherein, he becomes loyal towards the perceived
brand quality.
Customer loyalty has been a major focus of strategic marketing planning (Kotler, 1984) and offers an
important basis for developing a sustainable competitive advantage an advantage that can be realized
through marketing efforts. Although satisfaction measures seem to be an important barometer of how
customers are likely to behave in the future, there are two issues to consider:
Satisfaction measures are likely to be positively biased (Peterson & Wilson, 1992),
Establishing the relationship between satisfaction and repurchase behavior has been elusive
for many firms (Mittal & Kamakura, 2001).
In addition, a company can maintain a good relationship with customers through its brand personality
(Aaker and Biel, 1993). The direct impact of perceived brand quality on brand loyalty is examined in
this study. Consequently, perceived brand quality exhibits both direct and indirect effects on brand
loyalty. The indirect effect of perceived brand quality on brand loyalty through customer satisfaction is
indicated by the dotted arrows, and its direct effect on service loyalty is indicated by the solid line.
4. Discussion and Conclusion
Brand personality not only plays a crucial role in customer retention, but also has profound influence
on a company’s performance. A successful brand requires the building of a distinct brand personality
(Doyle, 1990; Kumar et al., 2006). By using various marketing approaches, a company may convey
their brand personality to consumers and have the consumers of varying personality traits believe and
recognize the company’s brand personality; thus, consumers may develop some kind of relationship
with the brand, which will further influence their brand loyalty.
The relationship between satisfaction and loyalty seems almost intuitive, and several researchers have
attempted to confirm this in their research (Cronin & Taylor, 1992; Newman & Werbel, 1973;
Woodside, Frey, & Daley, 1989). Over their buying lifetimes, customers’ loyal to a given seller may be
worth up to 10 times as much as its average customer (Health, 1997; Newell, 1997). Without customer
loyalty, even the best-designed e-business model will soon fall apart. In their quest to develop a loyal
customer base, most companies try their best to continually satisfy their customers and develop long-
run relationships with them.
Brand loyalty in consumer contexts is well researched (e.g., Ajzen and Fishbein. 1991: Baldinger and
Rubinson, 1996; Day, 1969; East and Hammond 1996, Ehrenberg;-1-988; Guest, 1942: Jacoby. 1971
Oliver, 1999). Academically, this study has the following theoretical implications. Unlike previous
research, this study probed into the possible relationships between various dimensions of brand
personality thus influencing the brand loyalty. Most of these relationships are supported by the current
data. In short, careful management of brand personality helps consumers to develop a favorable image
of the company.
By the above loyalty model, we can demonstrate support for many of the relationships identified in
previous research, as well as a conceptualization of the overall loyalty construct. The encouraging news
from this study is that brand personality consistently appear as most influential in fostering loyalty.
These results have direct implications for industrial marketing practitioners. Marketing practitioners
might consider focusing beyond customer satisfaction toward integrated marketing strategies that foster
brand trust and quality in the customer base in support of customer loyalty programs.
References
Aaker JL (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356.
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
9 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
Aaker, D.A. (1997), “Dimension of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, pp.
347-56.
Aaker, D.A. (1996), Building Strong Brand, Free Press, New York, NY.
Aaker, J.L. (1995), “Measuring the Human Characteristics of a Brand: A Personality Hierarchy”, in A
Brand as a Character, a Partner and a Person: Three Perspectives on the Question of Brand Personality,
J. Aaker and S. Fournier (editors), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, pp. 393-394.
Aaker, D.A. and Biel, A. (1993), Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong
Brands, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
Aaker, J. and S. Fournier (1995), “A Brand as a Character, a Partner and a Person: Three Perspectives
on the Question of Brand Personality”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 22, pp. 391-395.
Aaker, J., S. Fournier and S. A. Brasel (2004), “When Good Brands Do Bad”, Journal of Consumer
Research, Vol. 31, June, pp. 1-16.
Bennett, R. and Rundle-Thiele, S. (2000), “Attitudinal loyalty personality trait or brand specific?”,
ANZMAC 2000 Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, Griffith University
School of Marketing and Management, pp. 97-101.
Biel, A. L. (1993), “Converting Image into Equity”, in Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s
Role in Building Strong Brands, D. A. Aaker and A. Biel (editors), pp. 67-82, Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Buzzell, R.D., Gale, B.T. and Sultan, R.G.M. (1975), “Market share a key to profitability”, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 53, pp. 97-106. Cravens, D. (1994), Strategic Marketing, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.,
Boston, MA.
Chang P-L & Chieng M-H (2006). Building Consumer-Brand Relationship: A Cross-Cultural
Experiential View. Psychology & Marketing, 23(11), 927-959.
Day, G.S. (1996), “A two-dimensional concept to brand loyalty”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 30 No.
9, pp. 29-35. Dick, A. and Basu, K. (1994), “Customer loyalty: towards an integrated framework”,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 99-113.
Duncan, Tom and Moriarty, E. Sandra (1998). A Communication-Based Marketing Model for
Managing Relationships, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 1-13.
Doyle, P. (1990), “Building successful brands: the strategic options”, Journal of Consumer Marketing,
Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 5-20.
Freling TH & Forbes LP (2005b). An Examination of Brand Personality through Methodological
Triangulation. Journal of Brand Management, 13(2), 148-162.
Govers, P.C.M. and Schoormans, J.P.L. (2005), “Product personality and its influence on consumer
preference”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 189-97.
Guo, L.-J. (2003), The Effects of Personality Trait and Brand Personality on Brand Preference,
Graduate Institute of Management Science, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu.
Health, R. P. (1997) Loyalty for sale: Everybody’s doing frequency marketing-But only a few
companies are doing it well. Marketing Tools. Cowles Business Media Inc., 4, 6, 40.
Jacoby, J. and Olson, J.C. (1970), An Attitude Model of Brand Loyalty: Conceptual Underpinnings
and Instrumentation Research, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Keller, K. L. (1993), “Conceptualization, Measuring and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity”,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, Nº 1, pp. 1-22.
Kotler, P. (1984), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, and Control, 5th ed., Prentice- Hall,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Krishnamurthi, L. and Raj, S.P., 1991. An empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Brand
Loyalty and Customer Price Elasticity, Marketing Science 10, 2, 172-183.Kumar, R., Luthra, A. and
Datta, G. (2006), “Linkages between brand personality and brand loyalty: a qualitative study in
an emerging market in the Indian context”, South Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 13 No.
2, pp. 11-35.
Lannon, J. (1993), “Asking the Right Questions: What do People do with Advertising?”, in Brand
Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands, D. A. Aaker and A. Biel
(editors), pp. 163-176, Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Levy, S. J. (1959), “Symbols for Sales”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37, Nº 4, pp. 117- 124.
Malhotra, N. K. (1988), “Self concept and product choice: an integrated perspective” Journal of
Economic Psychology, Vol. 9, Nº 1, pp. 1-28.
Mengxia, Z. (2007), “Impact of brand personality on PALI: a comparative research between two
different brands”, International Management Review, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 36-46.
Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001). Satisfaction, repurchase intent, and repurchase behavior:
New Media and Mass Communication www.iiste.org
ISSN 2224-3267 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3275 (Online)
Vol 1, 2011
10 | P a g e
www.iiste.org
Investigating the moderating effect of customer characteristics. Journal of Marketing Research, 38,
131142.
Newell, F. (1997). The new rules of marketing: How to use one-to-one relationship marketing to be
the leader in your industry (1032). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Newman, J. W., & Werbel, R. A. (1973). Multivariate analysis of brand loyalty for major household
appliances. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 404 409.
Oliver, R.L. (1999), “Whence consumer loyalty?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63 No. 4, pp. 33-44.
Peterson, R. A., & Wilson, W. R. (1992). Measuring customer satisfaction: Fact and artifact. Journal
of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20, 6172.
Plummer, J. T. (1985). How personality makes a difference. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(6),
2731.
Raj, S.P. (1985), “Striking a balance between brand ‘popularity’ and brand ‘loyalty’”, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 49, pp. 53-9.
Reichheld, F.F. (1996). The Loyalty Effect, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Reichheld, F. and Sasser, W.E. (1990), “Zero defections”, Harward Business Review, Vol. 68, pp.
105-11. Rosenberg, L. J. and Czepiel, J.A., 1983, A marketing Approach to Customer Retention,
Journal of consumer Marketing 2, 45-51.
Sirgy, J. (1982), “Self-concept in consumer behavior: a critical review”, Journal of Consumer
Research, Vol. 9, December, pp. 287-300.
Woodside, A. G., Frey, L. L., & Daly, R. T. (1989). Linking service quality, customer satisfaction,
and behavioral intention. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 9, 517.
International Journals Call for Paper
The IISTE, a U.S. publisher, is currently hosting the academic journals listed below. The peer review process of the following journals
usually takes LESS THAN 14 business days and IISTE usually publishes a qualified article within 30 days. Authors should
send their full paper to the following email address. More information can be found in the IISTE website : www.iiste.org
Business, Economics, Finance and Management
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
European Journal of Business and Management
EJBM@iiste.org
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting
RJFA@iiste.org
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development
JESD@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management
IKM@iiste.org
Developing Country Studies
DCS@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters
IEL@iiste.org
Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research
JNSR@iiste.org
Chemistry and Materials Research
CMR@iiste.org
Mathematical Theory and Modeling
MTM@iiste.org
Advances in Physics Theories and Applications
APTA@iiste.org
Chemical and Process Engineering Research
CPER@iiste.org
Engineering, Technology and Systems
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems
CEIS@iiste.org
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering
ISDE@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy
JETP@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management
IKM@iiste.org
Control Theory and Informatics
CTI@iiste.org
Journal of Information Engineering and Applications
JIEA@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters
IEL@iiste.org
Network and Complex Systems
NCS@iiste.org
Environment, Civil, Materials Sciences
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Environment and Earth Science
JEES@iiste.org
Civil and Environmental Research
CER@iiste.org
Journal of Natural Sciences Research
JNSR@iiste.org
Civil and Environmental Research
CER@iiste.org
Life Science, Food and Medical Sciences
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research
JNSR@iiste.org
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare
JBAH@iiste.org
Food Science and Quality Management
FSQM@iiste.org
Chemistry and Materials Research
CMR@iiste.org
Education, and other Social Sciences
PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Education and Practice
JEP@iiste.org
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization
JLPG@iiste.org
New Media and Mass Communication
NMMC@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy
JETP@iiste.org
Historical Research Letter
HRL@iiste.org
Public Policy and Administration Research
PPAR@iiste.org
International Affairs and Global Strategy
IAGS@iiste.org
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences
RHSS@iiste.org
Developing Country Studies
DCS@iiste.org
Arts and Design Studies
ADS@iiste.org
summary of an interesting point. You can
position the text box anywhere in the
the formatting of the pull quote text box.]
Global knowledge sharing:
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's
Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP
Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld
Academic Search Engine, Elektronische
Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate,
OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library ,
NewJour, Google Scholar.
IISTE is member of CrossRef. All journals
have high IC Impact Factor Values (ICV).
... According to Wismiarsi and Purnama (2015) states that brand personality can be developed as a strategy to create customer loyalty. Research conducted by Farhat and Khan (2011), Then the hypothesis as follows: H1: There is a significant positive effect on customer loyalty brand personality. ...
... This means that the better implementing brand personality of Kukubima Energi, the greater consumers opportunity to do customer loyalty. This result is supported by previous research con-ducted by Farhat and Khan, (2011) that brand personality has a positive and significant effect toward customer satisfaction. ...
Article
The purpose of this study is to determine the direct and indirect influence of brand personality, brand reputation and price fairness toward customer loyalty through customer satisfaction as an intervening variable. Customer satisfaction influence customers to make an loyal. The population in this research is customers Kukubima Energi. The total sample in this research is 115 respondents with purposive sampling technique through a likert scale. Methods of collecting data using questionnaires and documentation. Data analysis using classic assumption test and hypothesis test (t test and path analysis) with SPSS Statistics version 21 programs. Based on the hypothesis test, the results show that brand personality has a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty, price fairness has a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty, brand reputation does not has a positive and significant effect on customer loyalty, and customer satisfaction has a positive and significant effect customer satisfaction. Mediation test shows that positive emotion mediates the effect of brand personality, and price fairness on customer satisfaction.
... Hypothesis one and two of this study shows that consumer satisfaction purchasing behaviour and brand loyalty are positively and significantly correlated with the sub variables of brand consciousness. Farhat, Khan (2011) concluded that loyalty can be foster by consistent brand personality. According to this study brand personality plays an important role for increasing the brand loyalty of a consumer. ...
Article
Full-text available
... Konsumen dapat menyukai brand yang memiliki brand personality yang lebih berbeda, dan dapat memungkinkan juga konsumen lebih mengenal brand yang mereka sukai. Konsumen mungkin dapat menggunakan brand dan produk sesuai dengan sifat kepribadian mereka sendiri (Farhat & Mustafa, 2011). Membangun dan mempertahankan brand loyalty adalah salah satu tema utama penelitian bagi pemasar untuk waktu yang sangat lama (Erdoğmuş & Çiçek, 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to determine the effect of brand popularity on brand loyalty, brand awareness, perceived quality and brand reputation among Etude House Indonesia users. Other objective of this study are to t he effect of brand loyalty, brand awareness, perceived quality and brand reputation on brand equity. The effect of brand equity on purchase intention To address the objectives of the study, a quantitative research design was implemented by distributing the questionaires to 360 Etude House Indonesia users and implementing the intruments that fulfilled the validity and reliability test requriements. The data were analyzed by SEM SmartPLS 3. The findings revealed that there was an effect of Brand popularity affects brand awareness, perceived quality, and brand reputation. Other results show that the counrry of brand origin affects brand loyalty, brand awareness and brand perceived quality. Also, Brand equity is determined by brand loyalty and brand reputation. While Brand equity has a significant effect on purchase intention. In addition, brand equity also impacts on purchase intention. However, in this study the relationship of brand popularity to brand loyalty, the effect of country of brand origin on brand reputation, the effect of brand awareness on brand equity and the effect of perceived quality on brand equity is not supported in hypothesis testing. Keywords: Brand Popularity; Country of Brand Origin; Brand Loyalty, Brand Awareness; Perceived Quality; Brand Reputation; Brand Equity; Purchase Intention
... Hypothesis testing reveals that the third hypothesis (H3) is not accepted, brand personality is not a significant and positive predictor for purchase intention, contradictive with previous research conducted by Chen and Chang [19], Punyatoya [37], and Vahdati and Nejad [38] who find out that brand personality can predict purchase intention. Brand personality becomes one of the consumer considerations besides the product itself. ...
... Zeithaml et al., (1996) proposed five dimensions of behavioral intentions which are loyalty to the organization, propensity to switch to another company, willingness to pay more, external response to a problem and internal response to a problem. Many studies examined the relationship between brand personality and customers' re-purchase intentions and reported that re-purchase intentions can be enhanced by including the concept of brand personality (Akin, 2011;Farhat and Khan, 2011;Chen and Phou, 2013). Venkateswaran et al., (2011), Lin and Huang (2012) and Yang et al., (2012) investigated the relationship between brand personality and repurchase intention and reported that brand personality positively affects repurchase intention. ...
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Charity organizations play an important role in enhancing the welfare of society. However, the brand personality of charity organizations and its relationship to re-donation intentions have received scant attention. Most of the studies were concerned with consumers’ intention to re-purchase tangible products. The current paper attempts to review the literature regarding brand personality of charity organizations and donors’ intention to re-donate. Based on the literature review, this study develops a conceptual framework that encompasses brand personality, brand experience, donors’ satisfaction and donors’ intentions to re-donate in charity organizations.
... This inconsistency underlay the researchers to put mediating variables, one of which is brand personality. Das (2014) and Farhat and Khan (2011), indicates that there is a positive and significant relationship between brand person- ality on loyalty. Based on the empirical study, the research hypothesis was formed as follows: H6: Brand Personality can mediate the relationship of Corporate Social Responsibility on Brand Loyalty ...
Article
Full-text available
This study aims to empirically examine the influence of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on brand loyalty with the brand personality and the corporate reputation as the mediators. This study used Partial Least Square (PLS) to analyze the data. The data was obtained from a survey by using the questionnaire with consumers of retail stores in Malang as its population. The samples were 150 visitors obtained by using non-probability sampling with purposive sampling technique. The findings of this study indicated that corporate social responsibility, either directly or indirectly, affected the brand loyalty through the mediation of the brand personality and corporate reputation. This study suggested the modern retailers pay more attention to the CSR program owned by their consumers. It highlighted the importance of improving the retailers’ corporate reputation and brand personality to be felt consumers to increase the retailers brand loyalty.
... The underlying reason for using celebrity is that it would affect the consumer purchase intention through the phenomena that marketers think that the consumers attention towards the message could be drawn by celebrities' profile and attributes via rub-off effects would transmit the image values into a message communication (Farhat & Khan, 2011;Pringle & Binet, 2005;Pornpitakpan, 2004;O'Mahony & Meenaghan, 1997). In fact, companies in Malaysia are spending millions on celebrity endorsements and are expanding their budget on promotional activities (Freeman & Chen, 2015;Tan, 2011). ...
Chapter
One of the strategies that are used by companies to differentiate their cosmetic products is celebrity endorsement. Despite this popular advertising technique, researchers and advertisers have not agreed as to which celebrity source characteristics are most effective in influencing consumers' purchase intention. Another important factor that affects consumers' purchase intention is the consumer ethnocentrism level. Consumers in different countries have different preference over local and international products. Thus, the objective of this chapter is to examine the source credibility theory with the moderating role of ethnocentrism. The result suggests that celebrity endorsers' trustworthiness (TR), attractiveness (AT), and expertise (EX) had a significant positive influence on cosmetic product purchase intention (CPPI). The moderating role of ethnocentrism between AT, TR, and CPPI were examined and found to be significant. This indicates that AT and TR are stronger when consumers' ethnocentrism is high.
... Dünya ve Türkiye genelinde konaklama endüstrisinde görülen büyüme ve gelişme giderek artan bir rekabet ortamına yol açmış ve bunun sonucu olarak müşteriyi elde tutmanın, başka bir deyişle sadık müşteri yaratmanın önemi de artmıştır. Yapılan pek çok çalışmanın da gösterdiği gibi yeni müşterileri etkilemenin maliyeti, var olan müşteriyi muhafaza etme maliyetinin altı katıdır (Reichheld 1993;Lee 2003;Farhat ve Khan 2011). Sadık müşteriler, günümüz işletmeleri için gelecekte de aynı işletmeyi tercih etme eğiliminde olan müşterilerdir (Parasuraman vd. ...
Article
Full-text available
Successful management of a retail bank’s brand requires some form of brand image, such as brand personality. Creating a retail bank’s brand personality is effective in establishing attachment between customers and the retail-banking brand they choose to support based on self-identification. As such, this study’s aim is to investigate the bank identification and perceived brand personality dimensions of retail banks among the profitable and significantly sized Generation Y banking market. For this study, a non-probability convenience sample of 300 Generation Y banking customers was used. A self-administered questionnaire was developed for data collection. The results of the study suggest that Generation Y customers perceive their chosen retail bank as successful, sophisticated, sincere, rugged, community driven and classic. Moreover, the results showed that the brand personality dimensions of community driven and successfulness are mostly related to the identification of Generation Y customers with their retail bank brand. Customers who easily identify with their retail bank brand bring financial benefits to the bank, as these customers remain loyal to the brand. The results provide insights that can help retail banks to better understand their current brand personality perceptions, which is important given that brand personality can improve bank brand identification among customers.
Article
Full-text available
Efectos de la personalidad de marca y rasgos culturales. Evidencia empírica para el caso de una bebida energética en Ecuador Resumen El presente estudio tiene como objetivo investigar la forma en la que los consumidores perciben la personalidad de una marca de bebida energética, e indagar cómo esta personalidad, además de los rasgos culturales de los encuestados, influye en la lealtad hacia la marca y en su intención de compra. Para este análisis se realizaron 400 encuestas a estudiantes de cuatro universidades de la ciudad de Cuenca en Ecuador.
Article
Although a considerable amount of research in personality psychology has been done to conceptualize human personality, identify the “Big Five” dimensions, and explore the meaning of each dimension, no parallel research has been conducted in consumer behavior on brand personality. Consequently, an understanding of the symbolic use of brands has been limited in the consumer behavior literature. In this research, the author develops a theoretical framework of the brand personality construct by determining the number and nature of dimensions of brand personality (Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness). To measure the five brand personality dimensions, a reliable, valid, and generalizable measurement scale is created. Finally, theoretical and practical implications regarding the symbolic use of brands are discussed.
Article
The author presents a conceptual model of brand equity from the perspective of the individual consumer. Customer-based brand equity is defined as the differential effect of brand knowledge on consumer response to the marketing of the brand. A brand is said to have positive (negative) customer-based brand equity when consumers react more (less) favorably to an element of the marketing mix for the brand than they do to the same marketing mix element when it is attributed to a fictitiously named or unnamed version of the product or service. Brand knowledge is conceptualized according to an associative network memory model in terms of two components, brand awareness and brand image (i.e., a set of brand associations). Customer-based brand equity occurs when the consumer is familiar with the brand and holds some favorable, strong, and unique brand associations in memory. Issues in building, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity are discussed, as well as areas for future research.
Article
Although a considerable amount of research in personality psychology has been done to conceptualize human personality, identify the ''Big Five'' dimensions, and explore the meaning of each dimension, no parallel research has been conducted in consumer behavior on brand personality, Consequently, an understanding of the symbolic use of brands has been limited in the consumer behavior literature. In this research, the author develops a theoretical framework of the brand personality construct by determining the number and nature of dimensions of brand personality (Sincerity, Excitement, Competence, Sophistication, and Ruggedness). Tc, measure the five brand personality dimensions, a reliable, valid, and generalizable measurement scale is created. Finally, theoretical and practical implications regarding the symbolic use of brands are discussed.
Article
Two different measures of brand loyalty are employed in an analysis of survey data by MCA in which six hypotheses are tested. A measure based on brand deliberation as well as brand repurchase appeared to yield better results than did repurchase alone.
Article
Contents: Preface. D.A. Aaker, A.L. Biel, Brand Equity and Advertising: An Overview. Part I: A Global View on Building Brands. S. Owen, The Landor ImagePower Survey: A Global Assessment of Brand Strength. J. Moore, Building Brands Across Markets: Cultural Differences in Brand Relationships Within the European Community. H. Tanaka, Branding in Japan. Part II: The Brand Personality and Brand Equity. A.L. Biel, Converting Image Into Equity. R. Batra, D.R. Lehmann, D. Singh, The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences. N. Smothers, Can Products and Brands Have Charisma? M. Blackston, Beyond Brand Personality: Building Brand Relationships. G. McCracken, The Value of the Brand: An Anthropological Perspective. Part III: The Role of Advertising in Creating Brand Equity. A. Kirmani, V. Zeithaml, Advertising, Perceived Quality, and Brand Image. J. Lannon, Asking the Right Questions: What Do People Do with Advertising? B. Wansink, M.L. Ray, Expansion Advertising and Brand Equity. J.A. Edell, M.C. Moore, The Impact and Memorability of Ad-Induced Feelings: Implications for Brand Equity. H.S. Krishnan, D. Chakravarti, Varieties of Brand Memory Induced by Advertising: Determinants, Measures, and Relationships. Part IV: Perspectives on Brand Equity. J. McQueen, C. Foley, J. Deighton, Decomposing a Brand's Consumer Franchise into Buyer Types. C.P. Haugtvedt, C. Leavitt, W.L. Schneier, Cognitive Strength of Established Brands: Memory, Attitudinal, and Structural Approaches. P.H. Farquhar, P.M. Herr, The Dual Structure of Brand Associations. Part V: Perspectives on Brand Extensions. K. Nakamoto, D.J. MacInnis, H-S. Jung, Advertising Claims and Evidence as Bases for Brand Equity and Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. D.M. Boush, Brands as Categories. E.M. Tauber, Fit and Leverage in Brand Extensions. Part VI: Case Studies and a Commentary. L. Winters, The Role of Corporate Advertising in Building a Brand: Chevron's Preconversion Campaign in Texas. D.A. Aaker, Are Brand Equity Investments Really Worthwhile? W.D. Wells, Brand Equities, Elephants and Birds: A Commentary.
Article
The relationship between a brand's share of users and its loyal franchise is investigated. Using TGI data on consumer purchase habits covering 1,000 brands in 86 product classes, it is found that brands with a larger share of users have proportionately larger fractions of loyal buyers. These results are useful in the allocation of resources between the enlargement of a brand's base of users and the development of users' loyalty.
Article
] This article examines the role of the perception of brand personality in consumers' brand preference, attitude, loyalty, and buying intent (PALI). A survey was carried out to measure, through a comparative approach, the opinions of 230 consumers of two brands: NIKE and SONY. After validating the brand personality inventory in China, a positive connotation is discovered. Theoretical Background Amongst the existing researches about brand equity, a key focus is devoted to the image of brand. Kapferer and Thoening (1994) indicated that brand image is the set of mental representations, emotional and/or cognitive, an individual or a group of individuals ascribe to a brand or to an organization. Brand personality is one of the essential elements of brand image. What is brand personality? Plummer (1985) defines brand personality as being perceptions of consumers about a brand. The brand has a special personality profile. According to David Aaker, in fact, any brand has an identity and nature, i.e. a brand personality profile. It tends to serve a symbolic or self-expressive function (Keller, 1993). Some researchers define brand personality from its expression. Upshaw (1995) thinks that the brand personality is same as the brand image or the brand reputation. In fact, the appearance of a brand is the external personality shown by the brand, like that of a person. All external personality is something that is given to the life of a brand, and it also serves as the link between the brand and the consumers either now or in the future. The more fascinating a brand, the more emotional is the communication with the consumers. Therefore, like the idea of Macrcac (1996), communication with consumers has the characteristics of variability dependent on brand personality profiles. Moreover, some researchers define the brand personality from its construction. Rajeev Batra (1999) thinks that the brand personality is the internal link of the whole brand image. It includes (but is not limited to) all of the relationships among the brand specialty, the brand identity, and the lifestyle and characteristics of a consumer. All such relationships create the entire image of a brand. Langmeyer (1994) thinks, a brand personality is constructed by its characteristics and the fascinating reaction process of consumers in the market environment, exactly like that the personality of a person is based on his or her heredity and his or her environment. Their researches show that the image of the product or the service can be measured independently, and it has no relation to the target consumers.