Content uploaded by Isabel Espadas
Author content
All content in this area was uploaded by Isabel Espadas on May 18, 2015
Content may be subject to copyright.
[page 10] [Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4]
Cardiovascular effects
of reflexology in healthy
individuals: evidence
for a specific increase
in blood pressure
Elisabeth Ruiz-Padial,
Nieves Torres López,
Javier Luna Bujaldón,
Isabel Espadas Villanueva,
Gustavo A. Reyes del Paso
University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain.
Abstract
The present study evaluates the cardiovascu-
lar effects of reflexology in a healthy sample.
Forty-one participants were randomly assigned
to one of three experimental groups: reflexolo-
gy (n=15), non-professional foot massage
(n=14), and a waiting time control group
(n=12). Dependent variables were systolic,
diastolic and mean blood pressure, inter-beat
interval, heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity measured pre- and post- inter-
ventions. The study was performed during
three 40-min sessions separated by weekly
intervals. Results show that the three manipu-
lations produce similar increases in inter-beat
interval, heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity. Reflexology specifically pro-
duces an increase in blood pressure, which
increases gradually over the three sessions.
The parallel increase in heart rate variability
and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity together
with the increase in blood pressure suggest
that reflexology is associated with a co-activa-
tion of both sympathetic and parasympathetic
branches of the Autonomic Nervous System.
These changes could be helpful in optimizing
homeostatic activity, promoting the healing
process and increasing the human organism’s
capacity to respond adaptively to internal and
external challenges. Finally, the observed phys-
iological changes in the waiting-time control
group shows the relevance of habituation
processes and suggests the need for addition of
waiting-time control groups in future studies.
Introduction
Reflexology is a form of healing already
practiced more than 4000 years ago in Ancient
China and Egypt.1Its basic premise is that all
glands, organs and systems of the body are rep-
resented on the feet, in such a way that by
pressing reflex points on the feet it is possible
to produce specific effects in those glands,
organs or systems. It is therefore assumed that
reflexology helps to maintain overall health
and relieve symptoms of stress and disease.1
This technique has been used for centuries
and reflexologists claim its effectiveness in
alleviating a wide range of diseases and afflic-
tions, such as pre-menstrual symptoms,2lower
back pain,3diabetes,4cancer,5multiple sclero-
sis,6anxiety,7asthma,8etc. However, the
methodological quality of most randomized
controlled studies is poor and the few well-con-
trolled studies show inconclusive results.9
There is recent evidence from a neuroimag-
ing study supporting the basic assumption
underlying foot reflexology. Nakamaru and col-
leagues10 found that reflexological stimulation
of foot reflex areas activated the somatosenso-
ry cortical areas of the corresponding body
parts. This finding is relevant since it demon-
strates that at least some parts of the body may
have reflex points in the foot. However, some
important aspects remain unclear. Does the
reflexology affect the functioning of the organs
that are stimulated? How exactly does reflexol-
ogy affect the healing process? It has been pro-
posed that reflexology stimulates the circulato-
ry and lymphatic systems, parasympathetic
activity, restorative sleep, etc,. while other
more secondary mechanisms such as relax-
ation, placebo effect, the therapeutic interac-
tion or the well known benefits of skin-to-skin
contact have been also considered.1,11,13
The skin-to-skin contact factor could be an
important mediating mechanism in the thera-
peutic effects of massage therapies in general.
Interpersonal touch has been shown to be
related to health and numerous studies have
related physical contact to decreases in blood
pressure and heart rate.14,15 Skin contact is
one of the primary mechanisms for the release
of oxytocin, a neuropeptide hormone with an
important protective effect on the autonomic
and cardiovascular systems. Oxytocin secre-
tion inhibits alpha-adrenergic and hypothala-
mic pituitary-adrenal activity, reduces cate-
cholamine, blood pressure and cardiac output
levels, and enhances vagal activity.14,16-19 It is
essential to distinguish between the simple
effects of skin-to-skin contact and the specific
effects of reflexology in order to be able to con-
firm the efficacy of reflexology.
For two main reasons it is particularly
important to focus on the effect that reflexolo-
gy may have on cardiovascular variables. On
the one hand, one of the major explanations
for the underlying mechanisms of reflexology
is its effect on the circulatory system,12 so it
could be expected to find changes in cardiovas-
cular parameters after reflexology. On the
other hand, some cardiovascular measures,
such as heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity, have been demonstrated to
be good indices of the organism’s auto-regula-
tory capacity and health.20-25
Non-invasive evaluation of autonomic
integrity and functioning can be performed by
means of heart rate variability, a measure of reg-
ular fluctuations in heart rate over time.26 The
baroreceptor reflex constitutes another impor-
tant source of autonomic regulation. The arteri-
al baroreceptors are stretch receptors located in
the wall of the carotid sinus and the aortic arch
and as such are a basic mechanism for the reg-
ulation of blood pressure. Increases in blood
pressure stretch the walls, stimulating the
baroreceptors, which in turn set off a reaction
through the brainstem centers producing a
reduction in heart rate, the contractility of the
heart, and vascular tone, leading in turn to a
reduction in blood pressure. The opposite occurs
when blood pressure decreases. In this way, the
activity of the baroreflex prevents rapid swings
in blood pressure by eliciting compensatory
adjustments in both parasympathetic and sym-
pathetic activation.27 The cardiac branch of the
reflex that relates blood pressure to inter-beat
interval is a powerful source of vagal afferent
input to the central nervous system. Moreover it
Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; volume 2:e4
Correspondence: Elisabeth Ruiz-Padial,
Universidad de Jaén, Campus Las Lagunillas,
Edif. C-5, 23071 Jaén, Spain.
Tel. +34.953.213.451 - Fax: +34.953.211.881.
E-mail: erpadial@ujaen.es
Key words: reflexology, foot massage, inter-beat
interval, heart rate variability, baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity.
Acknowledgments: this research was supported
by a grant from the Junta de Andalucía (Research
Group: HUM338).
Contributions: ERP, design and analysis of the
physiological data, review of the literature, writ-
ing of the manuscript; NTL, conception of the
study, interpretation of the results; JLB, concep-
tion, design and drafting of the paper, processing
of the self-report measures and the statistical
analysis. IEV, conception and design of the study,
drafting and the review of the article; GARPaso,
design of the study, analysis and interpretation of
the physiological results, writing of the paper.
Conflict of interest: the authors report no con-
flicts of interest.
Received for publication: 23 September 2011.
Revision received: 30 December 2011.
Accepted for publication: 19 January 2012.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-
NC 3.0).
©Copyright E. Ruiz-Padial et al., 2012
Licensee PAGEPress, Italy
Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4
doi:10.4081/ams.2012.e4
Non-commercial use only
[Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4] [page 11]
is one of the most important physiological mech-
anisms affecting efferent cardiac vagal activity
and the main generator of autonomic parasym-
pathetic measures such as respiratory sinus
arrhythmia and heart rate variability.27-29 It is
well established that autonomic parasympathet-
ic control is strongly associated with cardiovas-
cular diseases and is a powerful prognostic indi-
cator of cardiovascular health.23,24
The arterial baroreceptors, furthermore,
constitute the starting point of an afferent
pathway by which cardiovascular function
modulates central nervous activity.
Responding to mechanical stretch of the
carotid and aortic vessel walls, the barorecep-
tors trigger a global inhibitory effect on brain
activity that decreases somatic muscle tone,
stimulates sleep, inhibits spinal somatic sen-
sory pathways, reduces anger, anxiety and pain
and attenuates behavioural reactions to
painful and aversive stimuli.30-32 The barore-
flex’s inhibitory modulation of cerebral struc-
tures related to emotion and arousal is the
foundation for techniques for strengthening
the baroreceptors such as those that have tra-
ditionally been used in Russia for the treat-
ment of psychosomatic disorders such as asth-
ma, arterial hypertension, insomnia, etc.33,34
For all these reasons, heart rate variability and
baroreceptor functioning are good candidates
for the evaluation of the efficacy of reflexology.
To the best of our knowledge, few studies
have explored the effects of reflexology on car-
diac variables and most of them present impor-
tant methodological weakness. Frankel35 found
that reflexology and foot massage reduced
baroreceptor reflex sensitivity. However, this
result must be considered cautiously. In addi-
tion to using a small sample, the technique
used (the valsalva manoeuvre) is a now obso-
lete invasive method.36 Furthermore, some
contradictory associations found in this study
such as the negative relation between barore-
ceptor reflex sensitivity and respiratory sinus
arrhythmia are contrary to current evi-
dence,28,37 therefore suggesting the need for
new studies evaluating the effects of reflexolo-
gy on baroreceptor functioning using more up-
to-date methodology.
Some studies have evaluated the effects of
reflexology on heart rate variability. Joseph et
al.38 and Zhen et al.39 found decreases in heart
rate variability during reflexology in comparison
to a relaxed sitting position. This result seems
contra-intuitive and is contrary to findings from
other types of massage techniques such as the
myofascial trigger-point massage, which has
been shown to increase heart rate variability.40
Other studies have found a reduction in sys-
tolic blood pressure and heart rate following
reflexology7and other methods such as deep-
tissue massage therapy.41 Furthermore,
Ejindu42 found that while facial massage pro-
duces a reliable decrease in blood pressure, the
effects of foot massage on blood pressure are
negligible. Studies using electrical massage
devices, which perform pulse-synchronized
massage with air cuffs, have found that mas-
sage pulses increase peripheral vascular blood
flow, an effect that can influence venous return
and subsequent autonomic nerve activity.43
In addition to using small samples, many of
these studies do not include appropriate mas-
sage control groups, making it difficult to con-
clude whether the effects observed are due to
the reflexology or to the skin-to-skin contact.
More importantly, the studies aiming to evalu-
ate the effects of reflexology on physiological
parameters usually utilize a pre- post-interven-
tion assessment. None of these studies has
controlled for the effect of habituation to the
setting in which the intervention is performed.
Habituation is a non-associative learning
process that implicates a decrease in physio-
logical indices as the subject gets used to the
situation. The environmental context used in
these intervention studies is new for the sub-
ject (devices, wires, interpersonal contact,
etc.) and therefore has arousing properties.
Thus any decrease in physiological indices
might also be due to this habituation process.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate
the cardiovascular effects of reflexology in
comparison with a foot-massage procedure (to
control for the skin-to-skin contact factor) and
a waiting-time control group (to control for the
habituation process) in healthy participants.
Dependent variables were blood pressure,
inter-beat interval, heart rate variability and
baroreceptor reflex sensitivity. Furthermore,
the effects of the three procedures on self-
reported anxiety were assessed.
Materials and Methods
Subjects
Forty-one psychology students (20 male and
21 female) from the University of Jaén voluntar-
ily participated in the study. Their mean age
was 20.85±2.96 years and all of them were
healthy (none presented a diagnosis, history or
symptoms of any disease). Our students were
informed in classroom that they could sign in a
list if they were interested in participating in a
study on the effects of different techniques of
alternative medicine on psychophysiological
responses. Participants were randomly
assigned to one of three experimental groups:
15 to the reflexology group (R), 14 to the non-
professional foot massage (M) and 12 to the
waiting time control group (C). They did not
know the specific goals of the study nor which
group they were assigned to. The study protocol
was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the
University of Jaén and all the participants
signed the informed consent form.
Apparatus
Blood pressure was recorded continuously
and non-invasively on a beat-to-beat basis with
the Ohmeda 2300 BP monitor (Ohmeda,
Louisville, KY) from the middle phalanx of the
third finger of the right hand. The hand was
positioned at the level of the heart. This device
measures blood pressure following the vascu-
lar wall unloading principle and has been vali-
dated against intra-arterial continuous record-
ing.44 Electrocardiogram (ECG) was obtained
from Einthoven Lead II using a Biopac ECG
amplifier. Data acquisition and recording of
both ECG and blood pressure were carried out
at 500 Hz using a Biopac MP100 system
(Biopac System Inc., Goleta, CA).
Experimental group manipulations
For the reflexology group, the Ingham
method of reflexology was used, carried out by
one of the authors, an expert reflexologist.
Each session lasted 40 min (20 min each foot)
and started with the warming of one foot fol-
lowed by pressing the reflex point called solar
plexus seven times according to the respira-
tion of the participant, after which the reflexo-
logical massage covered urinary, circulatory,
immune, endocrine and central nervous sys-
tems as well as the spinal column, ending with
relaxation, after which the same sequence was
repeated for the other foot. Since skin-to-skin
contact may be one of the mediation mecha-
nisms in the efficacy of reflexology, another
group of participants received a non-profes-
sional foot massage lasting 20 min for each
foot. This massage was carried out by a stu-
dent who had no previous experience as a
masseur or reflexologist. To discard the effects
of habituation to the laboratory environment
on the dependent variables, a waiting time
control group was used. They received no treat-
ment and were seated for 40 min in a darkened
room under the same conditions as the other
two groups.
Self-reported variables
Anxiety was assessed with the Spanish
adaptation of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory
(STAI).45 We also developed two scales to eval-
uate the pleasantness and pain associated
with the two massage procedures. Participants
were asked to rate the pleasantness and
painfulness of both massage procedures using
a 0 to 10 scale (0 meaning not at all and 10
extremely pleasant and painful, respectively).
Procedure
Each participant attended three sessions sep-
arated by weekly intervals. All the sessions were
conducted in the Psychophysiology laboratory,
in a temperature-controlled room (mean tem-
perature was 23.6°C). Prior to the first session,
an interview was conducted in order to evaluate
Article
Non-commercial use only
[page 12] [Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4]
health status and pharmacological or psychi-
atric treatment. After receiving instructions, the
participant signed an informed consent form, as
we described above, and answered some ques-
tions related to age, exercise, menstrual cycle
(women only), any type of medications, alcohol
and food or drink consumed before the session.
After this, each participant completed the two
scales of the STAI (A/R –trait- and A/E –state).
Then electrodes were placed on the participant
and he/she was asked to seat comfortably in a
reclined position. After a 10-min rest period, a
5-min resting baseline of BP and ECG recording
was made after which the participant either
received a 20-min massage on each foot
(groups R and M) or was left alone for 40 min-
utes (group C). Immediately afterwards, a fur-
ther 5-min recording was taken. Finally, all par-
ticipants were given the State form of the STAI
and the R and M groups also completed the
scales for pleasantness and painfulness associ-
ated with the massage. With the exception of
the initial interview, the instructions and sign-
ing of the informed consent form, the second
and third sessions were identical to the first
one. Participants were instructed to refrain
from drinking caffeine or alcohol or performing
vigorous exercise for 2 h prior to the sessions.
Data reduction and analysis
Blood pressure was analyzed by obtaining
the systolic, diastolic and mean values for each
beat. Inter-beat interval was obtained from the
interval between successive ECG R-R waves.
Baroreceptor function was evaluated with a
time-domain program46 which locates either i)
sequences of three to six consecutive cardiac
cycles in which systolic blood pressure increas-
es (of at least 1 mmHg to each beat) in combi-
nation with an increase in inter-beat interval
(of at least 2 ms in each beat) or ii) sequences
in which the decrease of systolic blood pressure
is accompanied by a decrease in inter-beat
interval (following the same criteria of mini-
mum change). Each systolic value is paired
with the inter-beat interval calculated from the
very next heart beat -a lag of one beat- which is
associated with better estimates of barorecep-
tor reflex sensitivity.47 When one of these
sequences is detected, the corresponding
regression line is computed across all pulses in
that particular sequence. Baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity is expressed as the change in inter-
beat interval (in ms) per mmHg change in sys-
tolic blood pressure and is measured by the
slope of the regression line. Heart rate variabil-
ity was measured in the time-domain with the
root mean square successive difference
(RMSSD) of the inter-beat interval time-series.
There is a strong association between RMSSD
and respiratory sinus arrhythmia and parasym-
pathetic outflow.48,49 Finally, as an index of
blood pressure variability, the RMSSD of sys-
tolic blood pressure was also obtained.
Homogeneity of variances and normality
assumptions were assessed with the Levene
and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, respectively.
All variables analyzed fulfills the requirements
of parametric statistical analysis. We detect
baseline group differences for inter-beat inter-
val (F(2, 40)=6.38, P=0.004) and mean blood
pressure (F(2, 40)=3.643, P=0.036), as well as
trends for systolic blood pressure (F(2,
40)=1.94, P=0.157) and diastolic blood pres-
sure (F(2, 40)=2.38, P=0.106). In order to con-
trol such group differences, statistical analyses
for the above parameters were performed with
a 3(¥3¥2) repeated measures ANCOVA the
first factor between-group (Condition, manip-
ulated at three levels: reflexology, foot massage
and control), and two repeated-measures fac-
tors: session, with three levels (session 1, 2
and 3) and time, with two levels (pre- and post-
intervention or beginning and end of the ses-
sion for the waiting time control group).The
baseline value during the first session was
introduced as covariable. The remaining
parameters (systolic blood pressure variability,
inter-beat interval variability, baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity and the self-reported meas-
ures) were analyzed with a 3(¥3¥2) repeated
measures MANOVA, Effect sizes were calculat-
ed with the η² parameter. Post-hoc compar-
isons were performed with the Bonferroni pro-
cedure to control for the number of compar-
isons performed.
Results
Physiological measures
Blood pressure
Average values of systolic, diastolic and
mean blood pressure through the course of the
study are displayed in Figures 1 - 3. For systolic
blood pressure the ANCOVA shows significant
effects in the time (F(1,37)=11.91, P=0.001,
η2=0.243), condition (F(2,37)=7.85, P=0.001.
η2=0.298) and sessions (F(2,36)=4.59,
P=0.017, η2=0.203) factors. The interactions
time x condition (F(2,37)=10.29, P<0.0001,
η2=0.3585) and time¥sessions (F(2,36)=4.55,
P=0.017, η2=0.201) were also significant.
The analysis of the interaction
Time¥Condition shows that in the reflexology
group the Time factor was significant
(F(1,14)=33.90, P<0.0001, η2=0.708). As can
be observed in Figure 1, the reflexology inter-
vention increases blood pressure in that group.
In the foot massage group, the Time factor is
significant as a function of Sessions
(F(2,12)=9.11, P<0.01, η2=0.602). In this
group the Pre-Post comparison was significant
only in the second session (F(1,13)=5.20,
P<0.05, η2=0.284) where foot massage
increases blood pressure. In the control group
the Time factor was not significant. As shown
by the significant main Condition factor effect,
the increase in blood pressure after reflexolo-
gy results in greater levels of blood pressure in
the reflexology group than in the foot massage
group (P<0.0001) and the control group
(P<0.05), while the latter two groups did not
differ from one another (P=0.292). Table 1 dis-
plays the complete post-hoc analysis for sys-
tolic blood pressure. As can be observed, the
reflexology group shows higher blood pressure
values than the other two groups in the Post
periods of the three sessions, while the foot
massage and control groups did not show any
difference.
The effect of the Session factor is explained
by a decrease in blood pressure in the course of
the sessions that is especially larger in the
baseline periods and in the comparison
between the first and the second sessions
Article
Figure 1. Systolic blood pressure during the three sessions as a function of conditions.
Bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Non-commercial use only
[Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4] [page 13]
(t=4.84, P<0.0001). The interaction Time¥
Sessions is explained by the Time factor, which
was significant in the second (F(1,38)=27.26,
P<0.0001, η2=.418) and third (F(1,38)=15.04,
P<0.0001, η2=0.284) sessions, but not in the
first one.
The results of the ANCOVA for diastolic and
mean blood pressure are displayed in Table 2.
As can be observed, the effects are similar to
those found for systolic blood pressure.
As regards systolic blood pressure variabili-
ty, the MANOVA show significant effects in the
Time factor (F(1,38)=8.89, P<0.005, η2=0.19).
As can be observed in Figure 4, systolic blood
pressure variability increases after the inter-
vention, especially for the reflexology and foot
massage groups, but the interaction
Time¥Condition does not reach significance.
Inter-beat interval
The Time factor was significant
(F(1,37)=57.45, P<0.001, η2=0.456) as was
the interaction Time¥Sessions (F(2,36)=4.23,
P<0.05, η2=0.187). As can be observed in
Figure 5, inter-beat interval increases in all
three groups in the post-period. Although this
effect is observed in the three sessions, its sta-
tistical significance is reduced as a function of
sessions (F(1,38)=63.56, P<0.0001, η2=0.624;
F(1,38)=27.6, P<0.0001, η2=0.421; F(1,38)=
14.5, P<0.0001, η2=0.277; respectively for ses-
sions 1, 2, and 3).
As regards heart rate variability, the Time
factor was also significant (F(1,38)=30.21,
P<0.0001, η2=0.443) as was the interaction
Time¥Sessions (F(2,37)=3.326, P<0.05, η2=
0.152). As can be observed in Figure 6, heart
rate variability increases in the three groups
after intervention and again this effect decreas-
es as a function of sessions (F(1,38)=27,
P<0.0001, η2=0.417; F(1,38)=11.00, P<0.01,
η2=0.225; F(1,38)=9.14, P<0.01, η2=0.194;
respectively for sessions 1, 2, and 3).
Baroreceptor reflex sensitivity
The only significant effect found was for the
Time factor (F(1,38)=19.27, P<0.0001, η2=
0.337). As can be observed in Figure 7, barore-
ceptor reflex sensitivity increases in the three
groups after intervention.
Self-report measures
Anxiety
A main effect of Time (F(1,38)=40.89,
P<0.0001, η2=0.518) and a significant interac-
tion Time¥Condition (F(2,38)=6.37, P<0.004,
η2=0.251) were observed. As displayed in
Figure 8, anxiety decreases after reflexology
(F(1,14)=19.27, P<0.001, η2=0.579) and foot
massage (F(1,13)=26.52, P<0.0001, η2=0.671)
but does not change in the waiting control
group.
Article
Figure 2. Diastolic blood pressure during the three sessions as a function of conditions.
Bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3. Mean blood pressure during the three sessions as a function of conditions. Bars
indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 4. Systolic blood pressure variability during the three sessions as a function of con-
ditions. Bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Non-commercial use only
[page 14] [Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4]
Pleasantness and pain in the two
massage procedures
Both reflexology and non-professional foot
massage were evaluated as equally pleasant
(8.46±1.2 for the R group and 8.98±1.04 for the
M group). None of the main factors or their
interaction were significant. As regards inten-
sity of the pain, results showed significant
effects of Condition (F(1,27)=20.49, P<0.0001,
η2=0.431), Session (F(2,26)=5.174, P<0.05,
η2=0.285) and the interaction Condition¥
Session (F(2,26)=4.04, P<0.05, η2=0.237). As
can be observed in Figure 9, the reflexology
group rated the massage as more painful,
especially during the first session (F(2,13)
=5.47, P<0.05, η2=0.457).
Discussion
Our results indicate that reflexology pro-
duces an increase in blood pressure within
session (systolic, diastolic and mean blood
pressure) in comparison with the foot mas-
sage and the waiting-control group. No differ-
ences were found between the three condi-
tions regarding the other physiological meas-
ures. Inter-beat interval, heart rate variability
and baroreceptor reflex sensitivity increase
after reflexology, foot massage and waiting
time. However, the increase in inter-beat inter-
val and heart rate variability after the three
procedures decreases over the course of the
sessions, showing a habituation process. It is
noticeable that although inter-beat interval,
heart rate variability and baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity (indices of heart activity) all
increase, blood pressure also increases. This
suggests that the changes in blood pressure
can be explained by changes in vascular fac-
tors after reflexology.
Anxiety levels decrease in both the reflexol-
ogy and foot-massage groups after interven-
tion in each session. However, no change was
observed in the waiting control group. Both
types of massage were rated equally as highly
pleasant, although reflexological massage was
evaluated as painful as well.
Both heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity are indices of parasympathet-
ic cardiac control.22,28,37 Thus, the increased
heart rate variability and baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity during our three experimental
manipulations point to an increase in cardiac
vagal activity that is not specific to reflexology
since it also occurred during the foot-massage
and even the normal habituation process. So at
a conservative level, we can speculate that
most of this parasympathetic effect can be
explained as due to habituation to the labora-
tory environment.
Our results concerning baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity are contrary to those observed by
Article
Table 1. Mean systolic blood pressure differences between conditions for each of the
experimental periods. Post-hoc comparisons were performed with the Bonferroni proce-
dure. R, reflexology; M, foot massage; C, control group.
Session 1 Session 2 Session 3
Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
R versus M 11.24 20.95** 13.82*21.21** 12.97 23.98**
R versus C 7.68 13.93*5.65 15.24** 8.17 13.79*
M versus C -3.55 -7.02 8.18 -5.97 -4.79 10.19
P*<0.05, **<0.01
Table 2. Results of the 3(¥3¥2) repeated measures ANCOVA for diastolic (DBP) and
mean blood pressure (MBP). The baseline value during the first session was introduced
as covariable. Simple main effects (T=Time, S=Sessions and C=Condition) and signifi-
cant interactions are displayed.
DBP MBP
FPη2FPη2
T 10.96 0.002 0.229 9.52 0.004 0.205
S 2.01 0.148 0.101 3.31 0.048 0.155
C 3.25 0.049 0.128 3.84 0.030 0.172
T¥C 4.75 0.015 0.204 5.43 0.009 0.227
T¥S 13.10 <0.0001 0.421 8.35 0.001 0.317
Figure 5. Inter-beat interval during the three sessions as a function of conditions. Bars
indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 6. Heart rate variability (RMSSD) during the three sessions as a function of con-
ditions. Bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Non-commercial use only
[Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4] [page 15]
Frankel.35 Although not specific to reflexology,
we have found an increase in baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity while Frankel35 found
decreases in this parameter after reflexology.
This contradictory result may be due to the dif-
ferent techniques used to assess baroreflex
function. Our method, the sequence tech-
nique,36,46,50 is based on the non-invasive
analysis of spontaneous covariation of systolic
blood pressure and inter-beat interval through
a continuous beat-to-beat recording of blood
pressure. Frankel35 used the Valsalva manoeu-
vre, an older and invasive technique based on
respiratory manipulations that produces an
indirect baroreceptor reflex sensitivity index.
As an indication of the validity of our proce-
dure, in the present study we found correla-
tions of about r=0.683 between baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity and inter-beat interval and
r=0.843 between baroreceptor reflex sensitivi-
ty and heart rate variability, which are totally
congruent with expectations based on physiol-
ogy.28,37 Frankel35 on the other hand found a
negative relation between his baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity index and respiratory sinus
arrhythmia, which is contrary to current phys-
iological knowledge.28,37
Our results concerning heart rate variability
are consistent with those of Delaney et al.40 who
also found increases in heart rate variability
after myofascial trigger-point massage.
However, our results are contrary to those of
Joseph et al.38 and Zhen et al.39 who found
decreases in heart rate variability during reflex-
ology in comparison to a relaxed sitting posi-
tion. This difference could be explained by the
differential experimental procedures being
used. Firstly, in these two last studies the mas-
sage was performed by a mechanical reflexolog-
ical device while in our study it was carry out by
an expert reflexologist. Secondly, they meas-
ured heart rate variability during the actual
massage while in our study physiological meas-
urement was carried out just before and after
massage. Continuous foot stimulation during
reflexology probably produces phasic cardiac
responses that could interfere with a reliable
measure of heart rate variability.26 As regards
inter-beat interval, the observed decrease is in
accordance with previous studies.7,41
The increase observed in blood pressure after
reflexological massage is not consistent with
previous results, which usually reported
decreases in blood pressure in response to
reflexology as well as to other kinds of mas-
sage.7,41,42,51-55 This difference might be
explained by the specific reflex-points being
stimulated and the strength and depth of the
procedure. In our study the circulatory area was
one of the selected points and, as shown by the
pain ratings, the massage was performed in
depth. It could be argued that the increase in
blood pressure provoked by reflexology could be
a response to pain and negative feelings during
Article
Figure 7. Baroreceptor reflex sensitivity during the three sessions as a function of condi-
tions. Bars indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 8. State-anxiety ratings during the three sessions as a function of conditions. Bars
indicate standard errors of the mean.
Figure 9. Ratings of pain evoked by the two massage procedures. Bars indicate standard
errors of the mean.
Non-commercial use only
[page 16] [Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4]
the intervention. Pain is associated with
increases in blood pressure56 and it might
explain at least in part the increase in blood
pressure after reflexology. However, pain is also
accompanied by decreases in inter-beat interval,
heart rate variability and baroreceptor reflex
sensitivity,56 which contrast with the actual
changes observed in these parameters.
Furthermore, participants in the reflexology
group also rated the massage as pleasant and
their state anxiety decreased after the interven-
tion. In fact, no differences were found between
reflexology and foot massage groups in terms of
anxiety and pleasantness ratings. Altogether the
observed increases in inter-beat interval, heart
rate variability and baroreceptor reflex sensitivi-
ty and the self-reported data suggest that the
pain hypothesis can be discarded in our study.
An underlying physiological mechanism in
the explanation of the therapeutic effects of
reflexology and massage therapies in general
may be that they evoke a relaxation
response.13 Relaxation is known to have sever-
al beneficial effects such as an increase in
parasympathetic activity, a decrease in sympa-
thetic activity, catecholamine and cortisol lev-
els, immunologic potentiation, etc.57 All these
effects promote the normalization/balancing of
any deficiency and allow the body to function
more efficiently.57 The decrease observed in
state anxiety along with the changes in inter-
beat interval, heart rate variability and barore-
ceptor reflex sensitivity (that suggests an
increase in parasympathetic tone), which we
observed in the reflexology and foot massage
groups are congruent with this hypothesis.
However, the associated increase in blood
pressure due to reflexology is contrary to a
relaxation response and suggests that the
therapeutic effect of reflexology is different
and cannot simply be assimilated to the relax-
ation response. Therefore, reflexology seems
to act through a different mechanism.
As previously stated, the increase in heart
rate variability and baroreceptor reflex sensi-
tivity suggest an increase in cardiac vagal
activity after our three experimental condi-
tions. The increase in blood pressure associat-
ed specifically with the reflexology therapy
suggests a simultaneous activation of sympa-
thetic cardiac control. In this way, one of the
main findings of the study is the occurrence of
a co-activation of both branches of the
Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) after reflex-
ology. Co-activation of the two branches of the
ANS is one of the multiple possible modes of
autonomic functioning within a 2-dimensional
(sympathetic / parasympathetic) space.58 One
might speculate that reflexology strengthens
the balance of the ANS and makes it work in
equilibrium with superior level of activity of
both branches. This overall higher activity of
the ANS would help to optimize homeostatic
activity and increase the organism’s capacity
to respond adaptatively to internal and exter-
nal challenges.
Reflexology is believed to stimulate a healing
process, probably by potentiating a homeostatic
mechanism that restores health status. Blood
pressure is associated with the delivery of nutri-
ents, oxygen and energy to the tissues as well as
the removal of damaging toxins from the body.
One could speculate that the start of a healing
process, as with any other adaptive processes,
needs some additional energy resources. In this
way the increase in blood pressure is a useful
mechanism to mobilize and distribute this need
for supplemental energy.
Reflexologists claim that the healing effects
that this technique may generate are accumula-
tive. Our findings show that the increases pro-
duced by reflexology on blood pressure increas-
es the more sessions are performed. Most previ-
ous studies tested the efficacy of reflexology
after just one session. Our results confirm the
idea of an accumulative effect of reflexology59
and suggest the necessity of including several
sessions in future investigations.
Finally, an unexpected and surprising result
from our study is the increase in inter-beat
interval, heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity found in the waiting-time con-
trol group. This clearly shows that the habitua-
tion process associated simply with the course
of time is able to produce significant changes in
cardiovascular variables that resemble some of
the changes associated with massage. This
result is of relevance and suggests the need for
the addition of waiting-time control groups in
future studies on the effects of alternative ther-
apies on physiological indices. Similarly, the
observed decrease in blood pressure over the
sessions regardless of the condition could also
reflect a more long-term habituation process to
the laboratory situation.
To conclude, the results of this study show
that reflexology, foot-massage and even simply
the passing of time increase inter-beat inter-
val, heart rate variability and baroreceptor
reflex sensitivity, resulting in relaxation-like
changes. However, reflexology specifically is
associated with an increase in blood pressure
not observed in the other conditions. These
results suggest that reflexology is associated
with a co-activation of the two branches of the
ANS, which, combined with the increased sup-
ply of energy associated with the rise in blood
pressure, may help optimize homeostatic
activity and promote the healing process.
References
1. Blunt E. Foot Reflexology. Holist Nurs
Pract 2006;20:257-9.
2. Oleson T, Flocco W. Randomized controlled
study of premenstrual symptoms treated
with ear, hand, and foot reflexology. Obstet
Gynecol 1993;82:906-11.
3. Quinn F, Hughes CM, Baxter GD. Refle-xol-
ogy in the management of low back pain: a
pilot randomised controlled trial. Comple-
ment Ther Med 2008;16: 3-8.
4. Wang XM. Treating type II diabetes melli-
tus with foot reflexotherapy. Chung-Kuo
Chung Hsi i His Chieh Ho Tsa Chih
1993;13:536-8.
5. Stephenson NL, Weinrich SP, Tavakoli AS.
The Effects of foot reflexology on anxiety
and pain in patients with breast and lung
cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum 2000;27:67-72.
6. Siev-Ner I, Gamus D, Lerner-Geva L,
Achiron A. Reflexology treatment relieves
symptoms of multiple sclerosis: a random-
ized controlled study. Mult Scler 2003;9:
356-61.
7. McVicar AJ, Greenwood CR, Fewell F, et al.
Evaluation of anxiety, salivary cortisol and
melatonin secretion following reflexology
treatment: a pilot study in healthy individ-
uals. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2007;
13:137-45.
8. Petersen LN, Faurschou R, Olsen OT,
Svendsen UG. Foot zone therapy and
bronchial asthma: a controlled clinical
trial. Ugeskr Laeger 1992;154:2065-8.
9. Ernst E. Is reflexology an effective inter-
vention? A systematic review of ran-
domised controlled trials. Med J Aust 2009;
191:263-6.
10. Nakamaru T, Miura N, Fukushima A,
Kawashima R. Somatotopical relation-
ships between cortical activity and reflex
areas in reflexology: A functional magnet-
ic resonance imaging study. Neurosci Lett
2008;448:6-9.
11. Botting D. Review of literature on the
effectiveness of reflexology. Complement
Ther Nurs Midwifery 1997;3:123-30.
12. Byers DC. Better health with foot reflexol-
ogy. Saint Petersgurg, FL: Inghan; 1994.
13. Moyer CA, Rounds J, Hannum JW. A meta-
analysis of massage therapy research.
Psychol Bull 2004;130:3-18.
14. Grewen KM, Girdler SS, Amico J, Light KC.
Effects of partner support on resting oxy-
tocin, cortisol, norepinephrine, and blood
pressure before and after warm partner
contact. Psychosom Med 2005;67:531-8.
15. Light KC, Grewen KM, Amico J. More fre-
quent partner hugs and higher oxytocin
levels are linked to lower blood pressure
and heart rate in premenopausal women.
Biol Psychol 2005;69:5-21.
16. Knox SS, Uvnäs-Moberg K. Social isolation
and cardiovascular disease: an atheroscle-
rotic pathway? Psychoneuroendocrinology
1998;23:877-90.
17. Tailor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, et al. Biobe-
havioral responses to stress in females:
tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psy-
Article
Non-commercial use only
[Alternative Medicine Studies 2012; 2:e4] [page 17]
chol Rev 2000;107:411-29.
18. Uvnas-Moberg K. The oxytocin Factor.
Boston: Perseus Press; 2004.
19. Gallace A, Spence C. The science of inter-
personal touch: an overview. Neurosci
Biobehav Rev 2010;34:246-59.
20. Thayer J, Lane R. A model of neuro-viscer-
al integration in emotion regulation and
dysregulation. J Affect Disord 2000;61:201-
16.
21. Thayer J, Brosschot J. Psychosomatics and
psychopathology: looking up and down
from the brain. Psychoneuroendocrinology
2005;30:1050-8.
22. Thayer JF, Lane RD. The role of vagal func-
tion in the risk for cardiovascular disease
and mortality. Biol Psychol 2007;74:224-42.
23. Sleight P. The importance of the autonom-
ic nervous system in health and disease.
Aust N Z J Med 1997;27:467-73.
24. La Rovere MT, Bigger TJ, Marcus FI, et al.
Baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate vari-
ability in prediction of total cardiac mortal-
ity after myocardial infarction. Lancet
1998;351:478-84.
25. Reyes del Paso GA, Garrido S, Pulgar A, et
al. Aberrances in autonomic cardiovascu-
lar regulation in fibromyalgia síndrome
and their relevance for clinical pain
reports. Psychosom Med 2010;72:462-70.
26. Task Force of the European Society of
Cardiology and the North American
Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.
Heart rate variability: standards of meas-
urement, physiological interpretation and
clinical use. Circulation 1996;93:1043-65.
27. Eckberg D, Sleight P. Human baroreflexes
in health and disease. Oxford: Oxford
University Press; 1992.
28. Reyes del Paso GA, Langewitz W, Robles H,
Perez N. A between-subjects comparison
of respiratory sinus arrythmia and barore-
ceptor cardiac reflex sensitivity as non-
invasive measures of tonic parasympa-
thetic cardiac control. Int J Psychophysiol
1996;22:163-71.
29. Sleight P, La Rovere MT, Mortara A, et al.
Physiology and pathophysiology of heart
rate and blood pressure variability in
humans: is power spectral analysis largely
an index of baroreceptor gain?. Clin Sci
1995; 88:103-9.
30. Rau H, Elbert T. Psychophysiology of arte-
rial baroreceptors and the etiology of
hypertension. Biol Psychol 2001;57:179-
201.
31. Duschek S, Mück I, Reyes del Paso GA.
Relationships between baroreceptor car-
diac reflex sensitivity and pain experience
in normotensive individuals. Int J
Psychophysiol 2007;65:193-200.
32. Reyes del Paso GA, González MI,
Hernández JA, et al. Tonic blood pressure
modulates the relationships between
baroreceptor cardiac reflex sensitivity and
cognitive performance. Psychophysiology
2009;46:932-8.
33. Lehrer PM, Vaschillo E, Vaschillo B.
Resonant frequency training to heart car-
diac variability: Rationale and manual for
training. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback
2000;25:177-91.
34. Lehrer PM, Vaschillo E, Vaschillo B, et al.
Heart rate variability biofeedback increas-
es baroreflex gain and peak expiratory
flow. Psychosom Med 2003;65:796-805.
35. Frankel BSM. The effect of reflexology on
baroreceptor reflex sensitivity, blood pres-
sure and sinus arrhythmia. Complement
Ther Med 1997;5:80-4.
36. Parati G, di Rienzo M, Mancia G. How to
measure baroreflex sensitivity: From the
cardiovascular laboratory to daily life. J
Hypertens 2000;18:7-19.
37. Reyes del Paso GA, Hernández JA,
González MI. Differential analysis in the
time domain of the baroreceptor cardiac
reflex sensitivity as a function of sequence
length. Psychophysiology 2004;41:483-88.
38. Joseph KP, Acharya RU, Poo CK, et al.
Effect of reflexological stimulation on
heart rate variability. ITBM-RBM 2004;25:
40-5.
39. Zhen LP, Fatimah SN, Acharya RU, et al.
Study of heart rate variability due to
reflexological stimulation. Clin Acupunct
Oriental Med 2004;4:173-8.
40. Delaney JPA, Leong KS, Watkins A, Brodie
D. The short-term effects of myofascial
trigger point massage therapy on cardiac
autonomic tone in healthy subjects. J Adv
Nurs 2002;37:364-71.
41. Kaye AD, Kaye AJ, Swinford J, et al. The
effect of deep-tissue massage therapy on
blood pressure and heart rate. J Altern
Complement Med 2008;14:125-8.
42. Ejindu A. The effects of foot and facial
massage on sleep induction, blood pres-
sure, pulse and respiratory rate: Crossover
pilot study. Complement Ther Clin Pract
2007;13:266-75.
43. Tochikubo O, Ri S, Kura N. Effects of
Pulse-Synchronized Massage With Air
Cuffs on Peripheral Blood Flow and Auto-
nomic Nervous System. Circ J 2006;70:
1159-1163.
44. Settels JJ, Wasseling KH. FIN.A-PRES:
Non-invasive finger arterial pressure
waveform registration. In: Orlebeke JF,
Mulder G, vaan Doornen LPJ, editors. The
psychophysiology of cardiovascular con-
trol. New York: Plenum Presp; 1985. pp
267-283.
45. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R.
Manual del Cuestionario de Ansiedad
Estado/Rasgo (STAI) 3ª ed. Madrid: TEA;,
1982.
46. Reyes del Paso GA, González MI, Hernán-
dez JA. Comparison of baroreceptor car-
diac reflex sensitivity estimates from
inter-systolic and ECG R-R intervals.
Psychophysiology, 2010;47:1102-8.
47. Steptoe A, Vögele C. Cardiac baroreceptor
reflex function during postural change
assessed using non-invasive spontaneous
sequence analysis in young men.
Cardiovas Res 1990;24:627-32.
48. Berntson GG, Lozano DL, Chen YJ. Filter
properties of root mean square successive
difference (RMSSD) for heart rate.
Psychophysiology 2005;42:246-52.
49. Reyes del Paso GA. An on-line program to
calculate respiratory sinus arrhythmia
amplitude. Behav Res Med Inst Comp
1992;24:464-6.
50. Reyes del Paso GA, González MI, Hernán-
dez JA. Comparison of baroreceptor car-
diac reflex sensitivity estimates from
inter-systolic and ECG R-spike intervals.
Psychophysiology 2010;47:1102-8.
51. Mackereth PA, Booth K, Hillier VF, Caress
AL. Reflexology and progressive muscle
relaxation training for people with multi-
ple sclerosis: A crossover trial. Comple-
ment Ther Clin Pract 2009;15:14-21.
52. Post-White J, Kinney ME, Savik K, et al.
Therapeutic massage and healing touch
improve symptoms in cancer. Integr
Cancer Ther 2003;2:332-44.
53. Won JS, Kim KS, Kim KH, et al. Effect of
foot massage on stress in student nurses
in clinical practice. J Korean Acad Nurs
2000;7:197-207.
54. Hernandez-Reif M, Field T, Krasnegor J, et
al. High blood pressure and associated
symptoms were reduced by massage ther-
apy. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2000;4:31-8.
55. Field TM. Massage therapy effects. Am
Psychol 1998;53:1270-81.
56. Duschek S, Reyes del Paso, GA. Quantifi-
cation of cardiac baroreflex function at
rest and during autonomic stimulation. J
Physiol Sci 2007;57:259-68.
57. Berson H, Klipper MZ. The relaxation
response. New York: HarperTorch; 2000.
58. Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT, Quigley KS.
Autonomic determinism: The modes of
autonomic control, the doctrine of auto-
nomic space, and the laws of autonomic
constraint. Psychol Rev 1991;98:459-87.
59. Norman L. The reflexology handbook.
London: Piatkus; 1992.
Article
Non-commercial use only