An Issue Hiding in Plain Sight: When Are Speech-Language Pathologists Special Educators Rather Than Related Services Providers?

University of Vermont, 208 Colchester Avenue, Mann Hall 301A, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools (Impact Factor: 1.32). 09/2009; 41(4):531-8. DOI: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0127)
Source: PubMed


Under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA; as amended, 2004), speech-language pathology services may be either special education or a related service. Given the absence of guidance documents or research on this issue, the purposes of this clinical exchange are to (a) present and analyze the IDEA definitions related to speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and their roles, (b) offer a rationale for the importance of and distinction between their roles, (c) propose an initial conceptualization (i.e., flow chart) to distinguish between when an SLP should function as a related services provider versus a special educator, and (d) suggest actions to develop and disseminate a clearer shared understanding of this issue.
Federal definitions of special education and related services as related to SLPs are discussed in terms of determining special education eligibility, meeting student needs, ensuring SLPs are following their code of ethics and scope of practice, and facilitating appropriate personnel utilization and service delivery planning.
Clarifying the distinction between special education and related services should lead to increased likelihood of appropriate services for students with disabilities, improved working conditions for SLPs, and enhanced collaboration among team members. This clinical exchange is meant to promote dialogue and research about this underexamined issue.

Download full-text


Available from: Patricia A Prelock, Aug 07, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Implementing research-based curricula and instruction in inclusion-oriented schools is helped or hindered by having coherent models of service delivery accounting for the full range of student diversity. The current investigation offers data from 174 participants in 32 schools, analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation, and hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). The findings offer replication of special education service delivery data from an earlier study, new descriptive data, and HLM analyses that identify special educator school density (the number of special educator full-time equivalents to total school population) and individual special educators' Individualized Education Program (IEP) caseload size as variables predictive of special educators' ratings of the conduciveness of their working conditions to providing effective special education for students on IEPs.
    No preview · Article · Aug 2013 · The Journal of Special Education