Conference Paper

Double Block and Bleed and the Effects of Its Definitions on Pipeline Safety

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the author.

Abstract

Double Block and Bleed (DBB) is the term commonly used to describe the systems or valving arrangements that provide double barrier pressure isolation of those performing work on a pipeline system downstream of the barrier. The consequences of releasing pipeline pressure downstream to an unsuspecting maintenance crew go without stating. If the risks are so high as to demand not single, but double barrier isolation between the fury of pipeline pressure and the safety of personnel and equipment, why then has it been so difficult to develop a consensus for the definition or description of DBB systems? This paper will explore in detail the internationally published definitions for DBB and analyze their merits with respect to pipeline safety. Definitions from organizations such as the American Petroleum Institute (API), Occupational Health and Safety (OHSA), the International Standards Organization (ISO) will be reviewed to determine what they contribute or fail to contribute to the intent of worker protection. Some Provincial Governments have written specific requirements for pipeline isolation into law, while others do not address the matter. These issues will also be explored and compared to the practices of companies operating oil and gas pipelines. Some insight on the division of definitions is offered through an understanding of the purposes or needs of the definer. For example, a valve manufacturer with a need to demonstrate that his valve will indeed block flow from both directions and thereby permit maintenance of the valve without removal from the pipeline may not fully appreciate the pipeline maintenance employee’s need to isolate himself from pipeline pressure by two independent barriers. It will be shown that standards and specifications are available to support both perspectives and that there are compelling reasons for deriving commonality between these perspectives. With the development of International Standards for oil and gas pipelines and increasing emphasis on the harmonization of various national standards, matters such as operator safety must not be compromised. Interesting opportunities exist to revisit topics such as definitions for DBB and perhaps derive a set of words that allows consensus and encompasses the true intent of the concept.

No full-text available

Request Full-text Paper PDF

To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the author.

Article
Marine spherical double plugging is a novel plugging device, which can achieve the initiative plugging in the oil and gas pipeline. In order to ensure that the plugging head will not collide with the pipeline wall and not be scratched by the drill cuttings, the analysis of twisting process is necessary to assure reliable operation. In this article, we designed the overall scheme of marine spherical double plugging and established the mathematic model of spherical double plugging. Through studying the twisting algorithm of plugging head and trajectory algorithm of plugging head contour, four dangerous points were obtained. The multi-body dynamic of the structure was built using ADAMS, and the twisting process and motion analysis of four points were analyzed. The twisting error of the plugging head between the four points and the inner wall of the pipeline was analyzed in overshoot states to obtain the maximum allowable overshoot of inserting hydraulic cylinder and twisting hydraulic cylinder. Simulation results show that overshoot of inserting hydraulic cylinder needs to be controlled within 11.5 mm and overshoot of twisting hydraulic cylinder needs to be controlled within 5.3 mm to avoid the unpredictable danger. This article will provide theoretical and technical support for the optimization design of control system and the plugging head.
ResearchGate has not been able to resolve any references for this publication.