In the last year the international controversies over non-proliferation and nuclear energy that marked 1977 have moved from public view into the fifty-nation International Nuclear Fuel Cycle Evaluation (INFCE), organized at President Carter’s initiative and due to conclude within a year. In the March/ April 1979 issue of Survival, Ryukichi Imai argued from a Japanese perspective that existing
... [Show full abstract] nonproliferation efforts, including INFCE, are too narrow and technical. Can INFCE, which is primarily technical, lay the basis for the political compromise that will be necessary to strengthen safeguards against proliferation, in the face of new technologies? Can it do so under the pressure of American, Australian and Canadian national legislation that makes future uranium supplies conditional on acceptable non-proliferation regimes? These are the questions addressed by Steven Warnecke in an interim assessment of INFCE. His answers are not entirely reassuring.