ArticlePDF Available

Color and Shade Management in Esthetic Dentistry

Authors:

Abstract

The color and appearance of teeth is a complex phenomenon, with many factors such as lighting conditions, translucency, opacity, light scattering, gloss and the human eye and brain influencing the overall perception of tooth color. To achieve esthetics, four basic determinants are required in sequence; viz., position, contour, texture and color. The knowledge of the concept of color is essential for achieving good esthetics. This review compiles the various aspects of color, physics behind perception of color, measurements and shade matching in dentistry for various esthetic treatments. KEY WORDS: Chroma, colorimeter, hue, shade matching, shade selection, value
Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3120
INTRODUCTION
Think of the world without the color. Color can turn
everything, even the unsightly, into a visual pleasure.
Properly used, color creates atmosphere, defines space
and proportion, establishes order and exudes emotion. To
perceive all these one has to have the so‑called color sense;
i.e., the ability to make the right color choice.
Today’s dental restoration is consolidated around three
mainstays: The use of non‑metallic materials, such
as composite resins and ceramics; adhesion to dental
structures; and the achievement of a natural cosmetic
look.[1] The first step to achieving clinical success in
cosmetic dentistry will therefore be to correctly identify
the tooth color we need to imitate and material that most
closely matches and to communicate this information
to the laboratory if the restoration is to be fabricated
out there.[1]
The color of the tooth is determined by the combined effects
of intrinsic and extrinsic colorations.[2,3] Intrinsic tooth
color is associated with the light scattering and absorption
properties of the enamel and dentine.[2,4] Extrinsic color is
associated with the absorption of materials (e.g., tea, red
wine, chlorhexidine, iron salts) onto the surface of enamel
and in particular the pellicle coating and which ultimately
cause extrinsic stain.[2,5]
Color and Shade Management in Esthetic Dentistry
Vineet S. Agrawal, Sonali Kapoor
Department of Conservative and Endodontics, M.P. Dental College, Hospital and Oral Research Institute, Vadodara, Gujarat, India
The surge of interest in the use of tooth colored restorative
materials and systems in recent years has been attributed
partly to rapid developments in dental materials science
and also to patient demand and operator interest. This has
made several conservative esthetic treatment modalities
available. Although restorative dentistry has been defined
as being a blend of art and science, conservative esthetic
dentistry truly emphasizes the artistic component.
PHYSICS OF COLOR
Sir Isaac Newton was the first to break down the physics
of color. He found that a beam of white light could be
separated into component colors, or wavelengths, by
passing it through a prism. Newton described resulting
continuous series of colors as a spectrum and named these
colors in the following order: Red, orange, yellow, green,
blue, indigo and violet, as represented by commonly used
mnemonicassociationRoyG.Biv.Thesewavelengthsare
perceived by three types of color receptors (called cones)
in the human eye as variations of red, green and blue light,
hence the term visible light spectrum. In physical terms,
the wavelengths of visible light range from approximately
400 to 700 nm.[2,6]
Without light, color does not exist. It is the interaction
of light with the object that allows the perception of
color. If the light interacts with an object, some of the
light is absorbed by an object. The wavelength that are
not absorbed (i.e., those that are reflected, transmitted, or
emitted directly to the eye) are perceived by receptor cells
REVIEW ARTICLE
The color and appearance of teeth is a complex phenomenon, with many factors such as lighting conditions, translucency,
opacity, light scattering, gloss and the human eye and brain inuencing the overall perception of tooth color. To achieve
esthetics, four basic determinants are required in sequence; viz., position, contour, texture and color. The knowledge of
the concept of color is essential for achieving good esthetics. This review compiles the various aspects of color, physics
behind perception of color, measurements and shade matching in dentistry for various esthetic treatments.
KEY WORDS: Chroma, colorimeter, hue, shade matching, shade selection, value
ABSTRACT
Access this article online
Quick Response Code
Website:
www.urjd.org
DOI:
10.4103/2249-9725.123975
Address for Correspondence:
Dr. Vineet S. Agrawal,
101, Vinay Complex, Near Dudhdhara Dairy, Bholav,
Bharuch ‑ 392 002, Gujarat, India.
E‑mail: vineetdent@yahoo.co.in
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
121Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3
depends on the object’s capacity to modify the color of the
incident light. Color appears because the material absorbs
the radiating visible light, with the exception of the
wavelength reflected to the viewer’s eyes. A transparent
medium will allow visible light to pass through almost
unaltered. Translucent object scatter, transmit and absorb
portions of wavelengths of visible light, while opaque
materials do not transmit, but reflect and absorb various
wavelengths of visible light.
The observer
Visible light enters the eye through the transparent area
of the cornea and is focused by the crystalline lens on the
retina. The retina is composed of two types of specialized
photosensitive cells and is the receptor system for vision.
These specialized receptor cells are called rods and cones
and they contain photosensitive pigments.[7]
THREE DIMENSIONS OF COLOR
Color is usually described according to the Munsell color
space in terms of hue, value and chroma. When color is
determined using the Munsell system, value is determined
first followed by chroma. Hue is determined last by
matching with shade tabs of the value and chroma already
determined[10] [Figure 2].
Hue
“Hue” is the quality that distinguishes one family of
color from another. It is specified as the dominant range
of wavelengths in the visible spectrum that yields the
perceived color, even though the exact wavelength of the
perceived color may not be present.[11]
Value
Value is defined as the relative lightness or darkness of
a color or the brightness of the object. The brightness of
any object is a direct consequence of the amount of light
energy the object reflects or transmits. Munsell described
the value as a white‑to‑black gray scale. Bright objects
have lower amounts of gray and low‑value objects have
larger amounts of gray and will appear darker.[12]
(i.e., rods and cones) in the eye and recognized by the
brain as specific color.[7]
PRIMARY PREREQUISITE FOR PERCEPTION
OF COLOR(COLOR TRIAD)
The primary prerequisites for color perception include
three variable elements: The object, a light source for
illumination and an observer [Figure 1].
Light source
Color perception depends on the quality of light illuminating
the object. The ideal light source is natural light, occurring
around mid‑day for accurate color comparison. The time of
the day, month and weather conditions affect the color of
sunlight. If the light source changes, then the light reflected
from an object changes too; in that case, a different color
is perceived. The absence of ideal conditions has led to
the use of artificial lighting for color matching. The light
source that approximates standard daylight is ideal for
shade matching. Color temperature, spectral reflectance
curves and color rendering index (CRI) are all used to
measure the capacity to reproduce standard daylight (CRI
over 90 is recommended for color matching).[8,9] Dental
unit lights are usually incandescent lights that emit light
high in the red–yellow spectrum and are low at the blue
end. Regular cool white fluorescent lights are high in
the green–yellow spectrum. Color‑corrected fluorescent
lights are also available, which render the color more
accurately.[8] Full‑spectrum light‑emitting diodes (LEDs)
are now replacing incandescent bulbs. The shade‑matching
ability is better with a light‑correcting source than under
natural light.[2]
The object
Color is a physical property of the light that is modified
by the object and the total appearance of the material
Figure 1: Color triad Figure 2: Three dimensions of color
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3122
Chroma
Chroma is defined as the saturation, intensity or strength
of hue. Envision placing red food dye into a glass of
water. Each time more of the same color dye is added, the
intensity increases, but it is the same red color (hue). As
more dye is added, the mixture also appears darker, so the
increase in chroma has a corresponding change in value.
As chroma is increased, the value is decreased; chroma
and value are inversely related.[10,12]
COLOR IN DENTISTRY
Color perception and reproduction processes can be
applied in dentistry, specifically to shade matching
techniques. The important concept includes pigment
colors and the dimensions of color.
PIGMENT COLORS
Pigment colors are inherent hues of an object. Because
these colors are perceived through either transmission
or reflection of light, they are same as the subtractive
color used in color reproduction for reflective and
transmissive media. In dentistry it is necessary to
understand pigment colors as they are inherent in
restorative materials (e.g., ceramic, composites and
acrylic resins).
Primary colors: Red, yellow, blue
The primary pigment colors are similar to subtractive
primaries, but they are referred to as red, yellow and blue,
rather than magenta, yellow and cyan, respectively.
Like subtractive primaries these are the colors that are
perceivedwhenoneoftheRGB,wavelengthsisabsorbed;
red is perceived when green is absorbed, yellow when blue
is absorbed and blue when red is absorbed.
Secondary colors: Orange, green, violet
Secondary colors are formed by combining two of the
primary colors: Red and yellow create orange, yellow and
blue create green, blue and red create violet.
Complementary colors
Complementary colors are those that, when combined
in equal proportions, will form a dull gray that absorbs
and reflects/transmits all wavelength in equal amounts.
Complementary pigment color pairs are blue/orange,
red/green and yellow/violet.
Additive principle of complementary color may be used
to alter the value of restorations; for example, if the value
of a restoration needs to be lowered, the complementary
color can be added to that restoration to make the shade
grayer and hence lower in value.
METAMERISM
Metamerism occurs when the perception of color of two
objects is different because one of the variables of the
color triad (object, light source, or observer) is altered
while the other two remain the same. The phenomenon
of two objects to match in color under one condition but
showing apparent differences under another is termed
metamerism.[13] There are two types of metamerism:
Object metamerism and observer metamerism.
Object metamerism occurs when the two items appear
the same in one lighting condition, but appear differently
when the light source is changed. In dental terms, it occurs
when crown is matched to the natural dentition under
incandescent light, but, when viewed under color‑corrected
or fluorescent light, appears not to match the natural
teeth. To prevent metamerism, objects should have the
same spectral reflectance curves, since only materials with
identical spectral energy distribution curves will match
under all light sources. Color match does not require the light
source and objects to have the same reflectance spectrum.
Therefore, to obtain an acceptable shade determination,
it is advisable for the viewer (technician, clinician and
assistant) to observe the color matching under three
different lighting conditions – daylight, color – corrected
light and dim light.[14]
Observer metamerism occurs when the light source
remains the same and the observer changes, caused by
either human visual stimulus or instrumental stimulus.
Since color perception is dependent upon physiological
spectral response sensitivities of the cones in the fovea
and psychological interpretation by the brain, it is
recommended that a third observer (assistant, technician,
friend, or family member) evaluate the selected color prior
to cementation of any final restoration.
MEASUREMENT OF COLOR
Color determination in dentistry can be divided into two
categories:
• Visual
• Instrumental.
Visual technique
A popular system for visual determination of color
is the Munsell color system, the parameters of which
are represented in three dimensions [Figure 3]. Value
(lightness) is determined first by the selection of a tab that
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
123Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3
most nearly corresponds with the lightness or darkness of
the color.[15] Value ranges from white to black. Chroma is
determined next with tabs that are close to the measured
value but are of increasing saturation of color. Chroma
ranges from achromatic or gray to a highly saturated
color. Hue is determined last by matching with color tabs
of the “value” and “chroma” already determined. Hue is
measured on a scale from 2.5 to 10 in increments of 2.5
for each of the 10 color families (red, R; yellow‑red, YR;
yellow,Y; green‑yellow, GY;green, G; blue‑green,BG;
blue, B; purple‑blue, PB; purple, P; red‑purple, RP).
Visual color determination of a patient’s tooth is the most
frequently applied method in clinical dentistry. However,
visual determination of shade selection has been found to
be unreliable and inconsistent. Visual color assessment is
dependent on the observer’s physiologic and psychologic
responses to radiant energy stimulation. Inconsistencies
may result from uncontrolled factors such as fatigue,
aging, emotions, lighting conditions, previous eye
exposure, object and illuminant position and metamerism.
Paravina[16] evaluated a newly developed visual
shade‑matching apparatus, Shademat visual+ (SV+).
The SV+ apparatus enabled better shade‑matching
results than daylight. Correlated color temperature of the
daylight varied from 4500 to 6800 K, while light intensity
varied from 140 to 1000 lux. In SV+ trials, these values
were constant at the measuring place: 5000 K and 1400
lux. There is a need for a more scientific and consistent
means of shade matching in restorative dentistry.
Instrumental technique
In this system, the color space consists of three coordinates:
L*, a* and b* [Figure 4].[15] The L* refers to the lightness
coordinate and its value ranges from 0 for perfect black to
100 for perfect white. The a* and b* are the chromaticity
coordinates in the red–green axis and yellow–blue axis,
respectively. Positive a* values reflect the red color
range and negative values indicate the green color range.
Similarly, positive b* values indicate the yellow color range
while negative values indicate the blue color range. The
differences in the lightness and chromaticity coordinates
(ΔL*,Δa*,Δb*)asaresultofultravioletlightexposureare
determinedfirstandthetotalcolorchange(ΔE*ab) can be
calculated using the relationship.
∆∆
∆∆
E* Lab
ab =++(
***
)½
222
Instrumental color analysis, on the other hand, offers a
potential advantage over visual color determination because
instrumental readings are objective, can be quantified
and are more rapidly obtained. Spectrophotometers and
colorimeters have been used with modifications in an
attempt to overcome problems with visual shade matching
in dentistry. Photoelectric tristimulus colorimeters have
the potential to remove some of the shortcomings of
the visual method and have been shown to provide accurate
and repeatable measurements; however, they are not
error‑proof. In dentistry, the results of a colorimetric device
can be altered because the standardized illuminating light
emitted from the device may be scattered, absorbed,
transmitted, reflected and even displaced in a sideways
direction as a result of the translucent optical properties
of teeth and dental ceramics.
SHADE TAKING DEVICES
Shade guides
Shade matching tools are called color standards or shade
guides. There are different types of color standards
for dentistry, depending on their purpose and the tissue
for which they are intended. Tooth color standards, color
standards for oral soft‑tissues and color standards for
facial prostheses‑commonly known as dental, gingival
and facial shade guides, respectively ‑ are possible.
Clark introduced a custom shade guide in 1931 based on
visual assessment of human teeth, recorded in Munsell hue,
value and chroma. Acknowledging the deficiencies of the
available guides, Sproull, in the early 70s, suggested that an
ideal shade guide should consist of shade (color) tabs that
are well distributed and logically arranged in color space,
preferably based on the Munsell color system. Quality
control issues regarding color mismatches of shade tab and
porcelain batches from the same manufacturer could be
as problematic as mismatches among manufacturers. The
limitations of shade guides are factors that compromise
shade‑matching procedures in dentistry and contribute to the
dissatisfaction of clinicians, technicians and patients. A new
generation of shade guides has been developed to address
these deficiencies. Shofu offered the natural color concept
(NCC)[17] while Vita introduced a 3‑dimensional shade guide
system (Vita 3D‑Master). The NCC[18] system consists of
208 color blends based on 38 basic shades. The manufacturer
purports that these blends are logically arranged in L* a* b*
color space according to Munsell hue, chroma and value. In
addition, the shade guides and veneering material are made
of the same material to avoid the effect of metamerism.
The Vita 3D‑Master shade guide[6] [Figure 5a] features a
systematic colorimetric distribution of 26 shade tabs within
the tooth color space. The manufacturer purports that this
shade guide demonstrates an equidistant distribution in
the color space. The shade guide is organized into five
primary value levels, with a secondary distribution based on
chroma and hue. These value groups are arranged from the
lightest (value level 1) to the darkest (value level 5), left to
right. Intermediate shades can be achieved based on mixing
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3124
formulas. The manufacturer advocates a three‑step process:
Value is determined first in making a shade determination
and then the chroma and hue are determined. The selection
process is simplified because the number of choices decreases
throughout the procedure. The shade tabs arrangement
in the Vita classical[6] [Figure 5b] is by hue, whereas in the
chromascop guides[6] [Figure 5c], the tabs are arranged in five
clearly discernible value levels. Within each level are tabs that
represent different chromas and hues. The five levels cover
that area of the CIELAB color solid occupied by natural
teeth. The lightest value level has only two chroma steps of a
single hue and the darkest value level has three chroma steps
ofonehue.Groups2,3and4havethreechromalevelsofthe
middle and orange hue and two chroma levels in each hue
shift toward yellow or red. The sequence of shade selection is
value, then chroma, followed by hue.
There are certain principles that should be followed during
shade selection.[13,14,19‑21] These are as follows:
• Patient should be viewed at the eye level so that the
most color‑sensitive part of the retina will be used
• Shadecomparisonshouldbemadeunderdifferentlighting
conditions. Normally, the patient is taken to a window
Figure 3: Munsell color system
and the color is confirmed in natural daylight after initial
selection under incandescent and fluorescent lightening
• Theteethtobematchedshouldbeclean
• Shadecomparison should be madeat the startof the
patient visit
• Brightlycoloredclothingshouldbedrapedandlipstick
should be removed
• Shade comparison should be made quickly, with the
color samples placed under the lip directly next to the
tooth being matched
• The eye should be rested by focusing on a gray‑blue
surface immediately before a comparison since
this balances all the color sensors of the retina and
re‑sensitizes the eye to the yellow color of the tooth.
Technology based shade matching devices
• Digitalcameras
• Spectrophotometers
• Colorimeters.
Spot measurement (SM) devices measure a small area
on the tooth surface, while complete‑tooth measurement
(CTM) devices measure the entire tooth.[1,7] For SM
Figure 4: CIELAB system
c
Figure 5: Shade guides; (a) Vitapan 3D master shade guide; (b) Vita
lumin shade guide; (c) Chromascop shade guide
b
a
Figure 6: Technological based shade matching devices; (a) Shade
scan; (b) Spectro shade; (c) Vita easy shade; (d) Crystal eye;
(e) Shade eye NCC; (f) Shade vision
d
c
b
f
a
e
c
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
125Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3
devices, the size or diameter of the optical device aperture
(generally about 3 mm2) will determine how much of the
tooth surface and subsequent shade is measured. Examples
of such SM technologies are the Shofu ShadeEye‑NCC
chroma meter system and the Vita EasyShade system. CTM
systems measure the entire tooth surface and provide a
topographical map of the tooth in one image. Measurement
of the complete surface gives the operator more consistent
and reproducible information about the tooth structure.
Digital cameras
Digital photography, like many of the newer electronic
technologies in the industry, offers significant benefits to
dental practices. The digital camera is extremely efficient
and easy to use. Instead of focusing light on the film to
create a chemical reaction, digital cameras capture images
using charged coupled devices, which contain millions
of microscopically small light‑sensitive elements.[22] The
advantage of this method is that the camera records each of
the three colors at each pixel location. ShadeScan [Figure 6a]
combine digital color analysis with colorimetric analysis,
but SpectroShade [Figure 6b] is the only one that combines
digital color imaging with spectrophotometric analysis.
Spectrophotometers
A spectrophotometer measures and records the amount of
visible radiant energy reflected or transmitted by an object
one wavelength at a time for each value, chroma and hue
present in the entire visible spectrum.[23] There are two basic
optical light settings used in reflectance spectrophotometer
instruments: Illumination at 0 degrees and observation
at 45° (0/45) or illumination at 45° and observation at
0° (45/0). Because of the limited access afforded by the oral
cavity, only the 45/0 option is suitable for clinical use.[23,24]
The SpectroShade (MHT Optic Research, Niederhasli,
Switzerland) is the spectrophotometer developed
for clinical use that combines digital imaging with
spectrophotometric analysis. The unit consists of a
high‑intensity halogen light source that is directed to
the tooth through fiber‑optic bundles and lenses to
uniformly illuminate the field at a 45° angle. The Vita
EasyShade [Figure 6c] is a handheld spectrophotometer for
tooth shade matching. The fiber optic tip is approximately
5 mm in diameter (SM technology) and contains nineteen
1 mm diameter fiber‑optic fibers. A new spectrophotometer
Crystaleye [Figure 6d], is an extremely precise dental
color analysis system, which provides extremely precise
color measurement based on spectral estimation using a
LED light source.
Colorimeters
Filter colorimeters generally use three or four silicon
photodiodes that have spectral correction filters.
These filters act as analog function generators that limit
spectral characteristics of light striking the detector
surface.[6] The filter colorimeters are considered inferior to
scanning devices like spectrophotometers because of the
inability to match the standard observer functions. However,
because of their consistent and rapid sensing nature, these
devices can be used for quality control.[25‑27] The ShadeEye
NCC chroma meter [Figure 6e] is example of tristimulus
colorimeter. The ShadeVision system [Figure 6f] is a
device that combines digital color image technology with
colorimetric filtering technology.
THREE STEP SHADE MATCHING
PROCEDURES
First lightness, then chroma and then hue should be
matched. It is the same order as for Clark’s, Hayashi’s and
Hall’s shade guides as well as in vitapan 3D master.
What is actually needed is to reduce the number of
potentially adequate tabs to between 2 and 4 as quickly
as possible, by choosing tabs from the same or different
groups.
The next step is to choose the closest tab or combination
of appropriate shade tabs.
If there is no perfect match, a lighter and less chromatic tab
should be chosen, because it would be easy to do extrinsic
correction later.
Dentists position
A tooth should be viewed along its normal axis (the line of
sight perpendicular to the surface), using a diffuse light
source.
The dentist’s eye should be at the level of the patient’s
tooth. Regarding shade matching distance, visual acuity
for near vision is to be tested by Ophthalmologist at the
standard reading distance of 25‑33 cm. Viewing distance
should enables a viewing angle of not less than 2°.
Tab placement
The shade tab should be placed parallel to the tooth being
matched and with the same relative edge position. If
possible it should be in the same plane with the tooth‑not
in front of it or it will appear lighter and not behind it or it
will appear darker.
Time length and pauses
The first impression is frequently the best match and
shade matching trials should be limited to 5 s, at a time to
prevent eye fatigue and the recommendation to relax the
eyes by observing a blue card between two trials.
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3126
PROBLEMS DURING SHADE MATCHING
Color vision problem/color blindness
Most complex and misunderstood area of color sensation
is the detection of radiant energy by the receptors in the
human eye and the interpretation of this visual stimulation
by human brain.
Color blindness is caused by a deficiency in or absence of
one or more of the three types of photosensitive pigments
able to detect red, green and blue.
Different types of color vision confusion exist:
• Achromatism: Complete lack of hue sensitivity
• Dichromatism: Sensitivity to only two primary hues
usually either red or green is not perceived
• Trichromatism: Sensitivity to all three hues with
deficiency or abnormality of one of the three primary
pigments in the retinal cones.
Age
Aging is detrimental to color‑matching abilities because
the cornea and lens of the eye become yellowed with age,
imparting a yellow‑brown bias. This process begins at
age 30, becomes more noticeable at age 50 and has clinical
significance after 60 years of age. After age 60, many people
have significant difficulties in perceiving blues and purples.
Fatigue
Tired eyes cannot perceive color as accurately as alert
eyes. Compromised visual perception is due to systemic,
local or mental fatigue. Successive shade observations
(treating many patients requiring shade assessment during
a single workday) can be primary cause of fatigue.
Emotions
Color can function as a language. For, e.g., many places
in world, red suggest anger, yellow represents joy, blue is
associated with sadness.
It is generally known that emotion can affect papillary
diameter, causing dilation or constriction and this has a
direct effect on color discrimination.
Medications
The abuse of drugs, alcohol and caffeine will affect not
only judgment, but also color perception. Medications
can act on any part of the visual system from the visual
cortex to the retina. Viagra, a drug used to treat erectile
dysfunction, is notorious for causing vision to have a blue
tint. Of special concern for female practitioners are the
side‑effects caused by oral contraceptives, i.e., red‑green
or yellow‑blue discrimination defects. Long use of oral
contraceptives will cause a decrease in color perception of
blues and yellows.
Binocular difference
Binocular difference is the perception difference between
the left and the right eye. To test for binocular difference,
two objects are placed side by side under uniform
illumination. They may appear different, e.g., the one on
right may seem slightly lighter than the one on the left.
Placing shade tabs either above or below (rather than next
to) the tooth to be matched will help to eliminate error
caused by binocular difference.
Environmental influences
The setting in which an object is viewed can influence the
perceived color. The background and surroundings can
affect the saturations and the hues perceived. Patient’s
complexion, make‑up and even reflection from the operatory
equipment and walls can modify the color of the oral
environment and the shade sample, which can influence the
shade determination. Therefore, it is advisable to remove the
patient’s make‑up and utilize a neutral gray background in
the operatory to reduce the influence of surrounding colors
and to prevent an inaccurate shade determination.
CONCLUSIONS
The color and appearance of teeth is a complex phenomenon,
with many factors such as lighting conditions, translucency,
opacity, light scattering, gloss and the human eye and
brain influencing the overall perception of tooth color.
Continued research on the human visual system has given
us greater insight into how color discrimination is affected
by environment and other features such as disease, drugs
and aging. The basic fundamentals of color and light, the
radiation spectrum and the optical characteristics of the object
is to be understood before evaluating and selecting the proper
color shade for the restoration. The measurement of tooth
color is possible through a number of methods including
visual assessment with shade guides, spectrophotometry,
colorimetry and computer analysis of digital images.
REFERENCES
1. Pascual Moscardó A, Camps Alemany I. Chromatic appreciation
in the clinic and the laboratory. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal
2006;11:E363‑8.
2. Joiner A. Tooth colour: A review of  the literature. J Dent 2004;32
Suppl 1:3‑12.
3. Watts A, Addy M. Tooth discolouration and staining: A review of the
literature.BrDentJ2001;190:309‑16.
4. tenBoschJJ,CoopsJC.Toothcolorandreflectance asrelated tolight
scatteringandenamelhardness.JDentRes1995;74:374‑80.
5. JoinerA,JonesNM,RavenSJ.Investigationoffactorsinfluencingstain
formation utilizing an in situ model. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:471‑6.
6. BrewerJD,WeeA, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin
North Am 2004;48:v, 341‑58.
7. Chu SJ, Devigus A, Mieleszko A. Fundamentals of color, shade
matching and communication in esthetic dentistry. 3rd ed. Chicago:
Quintessence Publications; 2004. p. 54‑75.
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
Agrawal and Kapoor: Color and shade in esthetic dentistry
127Universal Research Journal of Dentistry · September-December 2013 · Vol 3 · Issue 3
8. ChuSJ.Precisionshadetechnology:Contemporar ystrategiesin shade
selection. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:79‑83;84.
9. Westland S. Review of the CIE system of colorimetr y and its use in
dentistry.JEsthetRestorDent2003;15Suppl1:S5‑12.
10. TerryDA,GellerW,TricO,AndersonMJ,TourvilleM,KobashigawaA.
Anatomical form defines color: Function, form, and aesthetics. Pract
Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:59‑67.
11. Fondriest J.Shade matching in restorative dentistry: The science and
strategies.IntJPeriodonticsRestorativeDent2003;23:467‑79.
12. Boksman L. Shade selection; accuracy and reproducibility. Ont Dent
2007;32:24‑7.
13. Capa N, Malkondu O, Kazazoglu E, Calikkocaoglu S. Evaluating
factors that affect the shade‑matching ability of dentists, dental staff
membersandlaypeople.JAmDentAssoc2010;141:71‑6.
14. Denissen H, Dozic A. Photometric assessment of tooth color using
commonlyavailablesoftware.EurJEsthetDent2010;5:204‑15.
15. Della Bona A, Barrett AA, Rosa V, Pinzetta C. Visual and instrumental
agreement in dental shade selection: Three distinct observer populations
and shade matching protocols. Dent Mater 2009;25:276‑81.
16. Paravina RD. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade‑matching
apparatus.IntJProsthodont2002;15:528‑34.
17. YuanJC,BrewerJD,MonacoEAJr,DavisEL.Defininganaturaltooth
color space based on a 3‑dimensional shade system. J Prosthet Dent
2007;98:110‑9.
18. Egger B. Natural color concept; a systematic approach to visual shade
selection. Quintessence Dent Technol 2003;26:161‑70.
19. Christopher CK. Shade selection. Aust Dent Pract 2007;10:116‑9.
20. DaggH,O'ConnellB,ClaffeyN,ByrneD,GormanC.Theinfluenceof
somedifferentfactorsontheaccuracyofshadeselection.JOralRehabil
2004;31:900‑4.
21. Park JH, Lee YK, Lim BS. Influence of illuminants on the color
distributionofshadeguides.JProsthetDent2006;96:402‑11.
22. CalE,SonugelenM, GuneriP,KeserciogluA,KoseT.Applicationof
adigital techniqueinevaluatingthe reliability of shadeguides.JOral
Rehabil 2004;31:483‑91.
23. Da Silva JD, Park SE, Weber HP, Ishikawa‑Nagai S. Clinical
performance of a newly developed spectrophotometric system on tooth
colorreproduction.JProsthetDent2008;99:361‑8.
24. Trushkowsky RD. How a spectrophotometer can help you achieve
esthetic shade matching. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:60‑6.
25. TungFF,GoldsteinGR,JangS,Hittelman E.The repeatability of an
intraoraldentalcolorimeter.JProsthetDent2002;88:585‑90.
26. YapAU,SimCP,LohWL, TeoJH. Human‑eyeversus computerized
color matching. Oper Dent 1999;24:358‑63.
27. Swift EJ Jr, Hammel SA, Lund PS. Colorimetric evaluation of  vita
shaderesincomposites.IntJProsthodont1994;7:356‑61.
How to cite this article: Agrawal VS, Kapoor S. Color and shade manage-
ment in esthetic dentistry. Univ Res J Dent 2013;3:120-7.
Source of Support: Nil, Conict of Interest: None declared
Author Help: Online submission of the manuscripts
Articles can be submitted online from http://www.journalonweb.com. For online submission, the articles should be prepared in two files (first
page file and article file). Images should be submitted separately.
1) First Page File:
Prepare the title page, covering letter, acknowledgement etc. using a word processor program. All information related to your identity should
be included here. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files.
2) Article File:
The main text of the article, beginning with the Abstract to References (including tables) should be in this file. Do not include any informa-
tion (such as acknowledgement, your names in page headers etc.) in this file. Use text/rtf/doc/pdf files. Do not zip the files. Limit the file
size to 1 MB. Do not incorporate images in the file. If file size is large, graphs can be submitted separately as images, without their being
incorporated in the article file. This will reduce the size of the file.
3) Images:
Submit good quality color images. Each image should be less than 4096 kb (4 MB) in size. The size of the image can be reduced by decreas-
ing the actual height and width of the images (keep up to about 6 inches and up to about 1800 x 1200 pixels). JPEG is the most suitable
file format. The image quality should be good enough to judge the scientific value of the image. For the purpose of printing, always retain a
good quality, high resolution image. This high resolution image should be sent to the editorial office at the time of sending a revised article.
4) Legends:
Legends for the figures/images should be included at the end of the article file.
[Downloadedfreefromhttp://www.urjd.orgonSaturday,May17,2014,IP:123.201.92.218]||ClickheretodownloadfreeAndroidapplicationforthisjournal
... Intrinsic color of the tooth is associated with light reflecting and absorption properties of enamel and dentin (tetracycline stains). Extrinsic color of the tooth is associated with the absorption of external materials (eg-Tea, Chlorhexidine, Red wine) onto the enamel surface [3]. ...
... Colors exist due to the interaction of light with objects, which reflect particular wavelengths that are received by the eye's receptor cells. Brain then recognizes these wavelengths as specific colors [3]. ...
... When two complementary colors are combined, they create a dull gray that absorbs and reflects all wavelengths equally. This fact can actually be quite useful in a clinical setting, as it allows for the combination of complementary colors to reduce the brightness of restorations that may be too bright [3]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Shade matching is a crucial aspect of restorative dentistry, playing a pivotal role in achieving aesthetic harmony and patient satisfaction. Replicating and reproducing the color of natural tooth with restorative material is a challenge. Shade selection is influenced by various factors, difference in which gives unsatisfactory results. Selection of shade play a important role in obtaining good esthetic restoration. This article discuss about dimensions of color, age related color changes in tooth, different shade selection methods like visual and digital, shade selection protocol using accurate methods and devices. Shade matching in dentistry is not merely a technical requirement but a holistic approach that combines scientific precision, technological advancements, and psychological considerations. Dentists must continuously refine their skills, stay abreast of technological innovations, and prioritize patient satisfaction to ensure the success of restorative procedures and the overall prosperity of their dental practice.
... Value describes the color on a white-to-blackgray scale, depending on the reflection of color. It is the most essential parameter in dentistry because the slightest difference can be easily detected than a difference in the other two parameters [4][5][6][7]. This inexpensive method is used by most practitioners due to its simplicity. ...
... These limitations encompass factors such as age, gender, experience, the presence of fatigue, color vision deficiencies, and any influence introduced by medication use. Others are limitations stemming from the environment in which the method is conducted, such as the ambient lighting and external variables [3,4,9,10]. Therefore, the instrumental technique is slowly taking over this conventional method [2]. ...
Article
Full-text available
Introduction The influence of dehydration on tooth shade constitutes a significant aspect, making it a pivotal area of study, particularly within the field of restorative dentistry. This prospective study was done to analyze, using a spectrophotometer, how dehydration affects the shade of the teeth. Materials and methods Twenty-five participants were recruited in this prospective study that took place in the Dental Care Center of Saint Joseph University of Beirut (Lebanon) between October 2022 and January 2023. The inclusion criteria for this study primarily comprised four intact maxillary incisors. On the other hand, damage, cavities, restorations, and staining served as exclusion criteria. The VITA Easyshade Advance (Vident, Brea, CA) spectrophotometer was used to record the measurements. The measures of L (which represents darkness to lightness), a (which represents greenness to redness), and b (which represents blueness to yellowness) were registered at the center of each tooth's labial surface at baseline and then at 10-minute intervals for 30 minutes while the teeth were dehydrating due to the placement of a rubber dam. The color difference (ΔE) was later calculated using L*a*b* measures, with the perceptibility threshold set at ΔE00=0.8. Statistical analyses were performed using the Friedman test, the Bonferroni post hoc test, and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results The different color changes represented by ΔE (ΔE1, ΔE2, and ΔE3) were found to be significantly higher than the perceptibility threshold of 0.8 (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between ΔE1 and ΔE3 (p<0.05). Moreover, a statistically significant difference was found between L0, L10, L20, and L30 (p<0.001). Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) exist between the means of L0 and L20, the means of L0 and L30, the means of L10 and L20, and the means of L10 and L30. Conclusion This study showed that dehydration affected the shade of the teeth: Lightness increased, and therefore, the teeth appeared whiter. Dentists should consider the hydration status of the teeth when evaluating color for treatments, as dehydration can significantly affect shade matching: the more the dehydration time elapses, the more the color difference compared to the baseline increases.
... Hue is measured on a scale of 2.5 to 10 in increments of 2.5 for each of the 10 colour families (red, R; yellow-red, YR; yellow, Y; green-yellow, GY; green, G; blue-green, BG; blue, B; purple-blue, PB; purple, P; red-purple, RP). 17 Tooth colour matching is most commonly performed visually using dental shade guides also known as colour standards, which is a tab of different hues that serves to determine a tooth shade accurately. To avoid the problems of metamerism these shades guide are made of porcelain materials. ...
... To avoid the problems of metamerism these shades guide are made of porcelain materials. 17 Different types of colour standards (shade guides) are used in dentistry, depending on their purpose and the tissue for which they are intended. These include tooth shade guides, shade guides for oral soft-tissues and shade guides for facial prostheses commonly known as dental, gingival and facial shade guides, respectively. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: Shade matching presents a complex and multidimensional process that involves the cognitive ability of the operator. Hence, dental professionals need to have high shade matching skill. Objective: To compare the shade matching ability among three categories of dental professionals and assess the inter-examiner reliability of the visual shade selection. Methods: This was a cross sectional study involving conventional visual tooth shade selection by three categories of dental professionals. Twenty four patients that met the selection criteria were included in the study and Ethical approval duly obtained. Visual shade selection using vital classical shade guide was done by calibrated 3 categories of the dental professionals. Data collected was analysed using IBM SPSS with statistical significance placed at p ≤0.05. Results: There were 9 (37.5%) male and 15 (62.5%) female participants with mean age ±SD of 39.9 ± 18.47 years. In the shade selection, the dental surgery technician and the house officer agreed in 2 (7.7%) teeth, dental surgery technician and consultant in 6 (23.1%) teeth while the house officer and consultant did so for 8 (30.8%) teeth. The three examiners agreed on shades selected for only 1 (3.8%) tooth. Inter-examiner reliability was 0.11. Shades selected by the consultant matched that of the spectrophotometer in 3 of the 26 teeth (11.5%) being the best. Conclusion: Inter-examiner reliability was very low in the conventional visual shade selection. Experience and training in colour science and shade selection may play a role in correct tooth shade selection.
... Spectrophotometers are considered the most reliable and reproducible measurement devices for determining the color changes of resin composites. 13 Spectrophotometers measure L*, a* and b* in the CIELAB color system and ∆E is calculated using the changes in the color parameters. The Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) has developed the CIEDE2000 formula, which considers all variables equally to more accurately determine perceptible and acceptable color change. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of different polishing systems on the color stability of single-shade composite resin after coffee immersion, brushing cycles, and re-polishing. Materials & Methods: A total of 40 disc-shaped single-shade composite resin (Omnichroma, Tokuyama, Japan) specimens were prepared using a standard mold. One-step (OneGloss, Shofu, USA), two-step (Clearfil Twist Dia, Kuraray, Japan), multi-step (OptiDisc, Kerr, USA) polishing systems were applied to each group (n=10) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. No polishing procedure was applied to the Control group. Representing 6 months and 1 year of clinical use, specimens were immersed in coffee solution (6–12 days) and subjected to brushing cycles (5000–10000 cycles). The specimens were then re-polished by applying the same polishing procedures as initially applied. Color measurements were repeated in all periods, and color change values were calculated with the CIEDE2000 formulation. Kruskal-Wallis analysis was used for between group comparison, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used as a post-hoc test. Statistical significance was accepted as p
... Immediately before shade comparison, the eye was focused on a gray-blue surface in order to balance all the color sensors of the retina and resolve the afterimage if it occurred. [33][34][35] Specific considerations were implemented for female participants, who were instructed to remove lipstick or lip gloss during the clinical examination and data collection process. Patients were also requested to wear neutral-colored attire and a gray apron was put over their clothes at the time of tooth shade selection to minimize the potential influence of colorful clothing on the examiner's perception of tooth color, thus ensuring the accuracy of the tooth color selection procedure. ...
... Color, as we perceive it using the rods and cones in our eyes, resembles the electromagnetic radiation an object reflects in a specific wavelength, while absorbing the radiating visible light. When the wavelength is within the visible spectrum, ranging from 380 nm to 700 nm, the human eye can see it and perceives it as a color [9]. The Munsell system describes color by three parameters: value, hue and chroma. ...
Article
Full-text available
Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the changes of light reflection% on two materials (monolithic zirconia and lithium disilicate) after using two external staining kits following by thermocycling. Methods: Specimens were sectioned from monolithic zirconia (n = 60) and lithium disilicate (n = 60) then divided into six groups (n = 20). Two different types of external staining kits were used and applied to the specimens. The light reflection% was measured before staining, after staining and after thermocycling using a spectrophotometer. Results: The light reflection% of zirconia was significantly higher compared to lithium disilicate at the beginning of the study (p = 0.005), after staining with kit 1 (p = 0.005) and kit 2 (p = 0.005) and after thermocycling (p = 0.005). For both materials, the light reflection% was lower after staining with Kit 1 compared to kit 2 (p < 0.043). After thermocycling, the light reflection% of lithium disilicate increased (p = 0.027) and was unchanged with Zirconia (p = 0.527). Conclusions: There is a difference between the materials regarding light reflection% as the monolithic zirconia showed higher light reflection% comparing lithium disilicate throughout the entire experiment. For lithium disilicate, we recommend using kit 1 as we found that, after thermocycling, the light reflection% of kit 2 was increased.
Book
Kompozit Rezinlerin Yüzey Özellikleri:Bileşenlerden Polisaj Materyallerine İdeal Materyal Arayışı Sultan Gizem ÜLKÜ Restoratif Materyallerde Yüzey Pürüzlülüğü ile Mikrobiyal Adezyon İlişkisi: Bir Literatür Derlemesi Mehmet Alperen ŞAHİN Özge Gizem YENİDÜNYA Diş Beyazlatma Ajanlarındaki Güncel Gelişmeler Hacer BALKAYA Gülsevim SARITAŞ Sezer DEMİRBUĞA Diş Hekimliğinde Probiyotiklerin Yeri ve Önemi Merve AKSOY YÜKSEK Cemile KEDİCİ ALP Çeşitli Dental Tedavi Prosedürlerinin Pulpada Oluşturduğu Termal Etkiler Melike GÜLER Meltem TEKBAŞ ATAY Diş Hekimliğinde İmmediyat Dentin Örtüleme Tekniği (IDS) Uygulaması Hacer BALKAYA Müge HASTEKKEŞİN Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Üç Boyutlu Yazıcıyla İndirekt İnley Restorasyon Üretimi Yasemin ÖZDEN Latife ALTINOK UYGUN Diş Sert Dokusu Remineralizasyonunda Son Gelişmeler Hilal ATEŞ Nagihan EKEN Mine DİNÇER Nurcan ÖZAKAR Dental Uygulamalarda Yapay Zeka Büşra BAZNA Zeynep Su SÖNMEZ Zeynep GÖKSU Nurcan ÖZAKAR Diş Hekimliğinde Floresan Destekli Tanımlama Tekniği (FIT) ve Uygulama Alanları Mustafa ÇADIRCI Nurcan ÖZAKAR Diş Hekimliğinde Eklemeli Üretim Kalitesini Etkileyen Faktörler Yasemin ÖZDEN Safa ÖZDEN Restoratif Diş Hekimliğinde Renk Sistemleri ve Kompozit Rezinlerin Renk Uyum Potansiyeli Sanem ÖZASLAN
Article
Full-text available
Aims and Objectives To evaluate the effect of coffee thermocycling on color stability and translucency of CAD‐CAM polychromatic high translucent zirconia compared with lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Methods Sixteen rectangular plates (14 × 16 × 1.0 mm) of two ceramic materials (IPS E.max CAD (IEC), IPS E.max ZirCAD Prime [IZP]) were prepared. Each specimen was measured for color coordinates using a spectrophotometer following 30,000 cycles of coffee thermocycling. CIELAB formula was used to determine color and translucency differences (ΔE and ΔTP). The means of ΔE and ΔTP were compared using independent samples t‐test and were evaluated using their respective 50%:50% perceptibility and acceptability thresholds (PT and AT). One‐way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the translucency parameter (TP) and surface roughness (Ra) of each material. Results Mean ΔE values of IEC (4.69) and IZP (4.64) were higher than the AT (ΔE ≤ 2.7) with no significant difference found between the two groups (p = 0.202). Considering the TP, only IEC showed a statistically significant increase in TP value (p < 0.001). However, the mean ΔTP of IEC (3.25) remained within the range of acceptability (1.3 < ΔTP ≤ 4.4). Conclusions Within the limitations of this current study, the color stability of all materials was clinically affected by coffee thermocycling. In terms of translucency, only lithium disilicate glass ceramic was influenced by coffee thermocycling. High translucent zirconia had superior translucency stability compared to lithium disilicate glass ceramic.
Article
Introduction: Fixed partial denture is a prosthesis that is permanently attached to one or more damaged teeth, or to replace missing teeth. Shade determination was one of the first step in restoration procedures or making dentures. Restoration could be a failure due to the selection of an inappropriate tooth shade, especially in the replacement of anterior teeth that have high requirements to support appearance and aesthetics. The use of a spectrophotometer and digital camera could help dentists in choosing tooth shades. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine and analyze differences in the color accuracy of anterior teeth using a spectrophotometer and digital camera in the manufacture of fixed partial denture. Method: This study used a systematic literature review with fifteen journals.The type of research was a survey and cross-sectional so that the bias analysis will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) and the data extraction in this study also uses a form according to CASP. The data obtained will be synthesized qualitatively. Result: This study showed that seven out of fifteen journals reported that the use of a spectrophotometer in the tooth shade determination provided an accurate result in the selection of anterior tooth shade, while eight other journals stated that the use of a digital camera could be an alternative in choosing tooth shade because digital cameras are easy to get and could combine color features to produce accurate colors. Conclusion: Spectrophotometers and digital cameras could provide good results in terms of shade accuracy and precision.
Article
Introduction Shade matching is an essential procedure to obtain an esthetic prosthesis. The Direct Visual Shade Matching (DSM) method using shade guides is the most used method by dentists. However, The Indirect Visual Digital Shade Matching (ISM) method based on digital imaging is concerned to be reliable and useful in determining shade matching in dental practice. Several factors such as method, clinical experience, and gender can affect the success of shade matching. Aim of the Study This study aimed to compare these two methods and evaluate the effect of experience and gender on the results. Materials and Methods Three volunteers' maxillary central incisor teeth were evaluated using (DSM) and (ISM) methods by 87 examiners (42 males, 45 females). These examiners were further divided into three groups based on their clinical experience: Undergraduate Preclinical Dental Students (UPDS) with 31 examiners, Undergraduate Clinical Dental Students (UCDS) with 34 examiners, and Postgraduate Dental Students from the Department of Prosthodontics (PDS) with 22 examiners. The spectrophotometer device results of three teeth were considered as a reference for shade matching. Statistical analyses of the data were performed using Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U , and Chi‐square tests. Results No significant difference was found between indirect and direct methods according to Perfect Matches ( p > 0.05). However, according to Shade Matching Deviation Score (SMDS) values a statistically significant difference was found between the two methods where the best result was obtained with the ISM method ( p < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the PDS group and the other two groups in terms of clinical experience ( p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between gender groups ( p > 0.05). Conclusion Digital images, captured under standardized lighting conditions, may serve as a reliable alternative method for direct shade matching. The (ISM) method requires a camera, related accessories, and computer skills. However, as these tools are commonly available nowadays, the focus for practitioners should be on effectively learning and applying these tools to achieve the best results. While clinical experience plays a significant role in the shade matching process, gender does not appear to have a substantial influence. Clinical Significance This study found no significant differences between the (DSM) and (ISM) methods, leaving the clinical relevance of this method open to debate. However, the ISM method yielded superior responses. Despite requiring specialized tools, conditions, and training, the widespread use of cameras and computers in modern clinics makes the necessary equipment and software readily available. This method enhances clinician‐technician communication, potentially improving prosthesis esthetics and patient satisfaction, especially for less experienced clinicians or those with color deficiencies. Further research is crucial to determine its clinical significance.
Article
Full-text available
When we observe the light reflected from surfaces in a scene or look directly at light emitted by light sources, we experience the sensation of color. Color is just one attribute of a complex and not fully understood set of properties that define the appearance of our surroundings. To measure or specify the color of an object, we need to take into account the nature of the light under which the object is viewed, the spectral reflectance properties of the surface, and the properties of the human color vision system. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE In this article the CIE system of colorimetry is briefly reviewed and its limitations are described.
Article
Full-text available
This study tested the hypothesis that the agreement between observer visual dental shade matches and instrumental shade identification is higher using the Vita 3D-Master (3D) shade guide than the Vita classical (VC) shade guide. Three populations selected shade matches: non-dental observers (GP) matched shade tabs-to-tabs and dental students (DS) and dentists (DD) matched an in vivo natural right upper central incisor (RUCI). All observers (n=600) used both shade guides (3D and VC) in two lighting conditions, cool white fluorescent lighting (CWF) and natural sunlight (NSL). The shade tabs and natural teeth were identified using an intra-oral spectrophotometer (Vita Easyshade) to determine the instrumental agreement with the visual shade selection. The percent visual-instrumental shade agreement (PVIA) was analyzed statistically considering: observer population, shade guide set, and lighting condition. A "substantial" intra-examiner agreement (k=0.76) was observed. The PVIA ranged from 12% (DS) for the 3D-NSL condition to 42% (DD) with the VC-CWF condition, which also resulted in the highest PVIA for GP (38.5%) and DS (35%). Results indicated that the GP with neither dental knowledge nor shade guide experience had a significantly higher PVIA using the VC rather than the 3D shade guide. Dentists demonstrated the highest PVIA (42%) for both lighting conditions and shade guides, thereby rejecting the study hypothesis. A significantly higher visual-instrumental shade agreement was demonstrated by the clinically experienced dentists (DD), regardless of shade guides and lighting conditions.
Article
In order to understand the factors of extrinsic stain formation more fully, we have developed an in situ stain model. This consists of polished bovine enamel blocks attached to partial or full dentures worn by adult volunteers for 24 h per day. The dentures were cleaned twice daily with a commercial dentifrice and toothbrush, with care taken to avoid brushing the inserts. A Minolta CR321 Chroma Meter in the L*a*b* mode was used for taking reflectance measurements of the stain formed on the enamel inserts. From these values, changes in the color of the inserts were calculated and the level of stain determined. In general, the stain formed on the enamel inserts was yellow and increased in intensity and darkness with time. The enamel inserts with the largest stain increases were from smokers rather than non-smokers. No correlation was observed between amount of stain and quantity of tea and coffee consumed. When the effects of surface roughness on in situ stain formation were considered, the major variable in this study was found to be the location of the enamel insert in the denture rather than the surface roughness.
Article
Objective To carry out an extensive review of the literature on tooth staining with particular regard to some of the more recent literature on the mechanisms of tooth staining involving mouthrinses.Design Comprehensive review of the literature over four decades.Conclusions A knowledge of the aetiology of tooth staining is of importance to dental surgeons in order to enable a correct diagnosis to be made when examining a discoloured dentition and allows the dental practitioner to explain to the patient the exact nature of the condition. In some instances, the mechanism of staining may have an effect on the outcome of treatment and influence the treatment options the dentist will be able to offer to patients.
Article
It would be expedient to develop a simple digital procedure for matching shade guides to teeth for dental restorations. It was hypothesized that precise and objective L*a*b* measurements could be performed on photographic images of teeth and shade guides using commonly available photo software. Tooth shade guide tabs, shaped like computer-generated posterior crowns, were used for color matching. Digital photographs were obtained of the vestibular surface of the tooth and the neighboring shade guide. Sections of the tooth and shade guide on the photograph were cropped and analyzed in Photoshop CS2. The precision error of the measurements was expressed as the coefficient of variation in percent. The effects of tolerance setting and number of measurements and analysts were evaluated. The difference in color was calculated as the DeltaE L*a*b*. The precision errors of the L*a*b* measurements with a tolerance setting of 6 pixels were better than 1.3%. There was no significant difference between one and five repeated measurements or between the measurements and the precision errors of two analysts. Color differences (DeltaE) between repeated measurements were below 0.5 units, thus reproducible and visually identical. DeltaE L*a*b* calculations were expedient for matching a particular color guide tab to the neighboring tooth. The color coordinates L*a*b* of teeth and shade guides can be calculated with a precision error of only 1.3%, using readily available software. A tolerance setting of 6 pixels is optimal and only one measurement and one analyst are necessary for objective and precise measurements. The described digital L*a*b* measurements on a photograph offer the dentist and the ceramist a simple, precise, and objective tool for matching tooth and shade guide.
Article
The authors conducted a study to evaluate the influence of dentists' and nondentists' experience, age, sex, eye color and use of eyeglasses or contact lenses on tooth shade-matching ability. The authors included 120 participants in this study conducted in Istanbul (periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists, endodontists, pediatric dentists, prosthodontists, restorative dentists, general dentists in private practice, dental technicians, dental assistants, dental assistant students and laypeople). The authors assigned participants to one of three groups: group 1 was composed of prosthodontists, restorative dentists and dental technicians; group 2 consisted of other dental specialists and general dentists; and group 3 included dental assistants, dental assistant students and laypeople. The authors asked participants to match the shades of three artificial maxillary right central incisors (Vitapan acrylic teeth [shades 2L1.5, 1M2, 2R1.5], Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) by using a shade guide system (Vita Toothguide 3D-Master, Vita Zahnfabrik). They calculated shade matching for the three color components (value, hue, chroma) and analyzed the results by using a chi(2) test. The rate of success in matching the shade for IM2 was 53.3 percent for participants in group 1, 30 percent for participants in group 2 and 20 percent for participants in group 3 (P = .017). However, there were no significant differences between the three groups for shades 2L1.5 and 2R1.5. Professional experience (P = .003) and age (P = .027) were associated with shade-matching success for tooth shade 2L1.5 only. The results showed no statistically significant differences with respect to sex, eye color or use of eyeglasses or contact lenses. Dental care professionals who routinely performed restorative procedures matched the shades better than did participants in other groups. Professional experience was associated positively with the outcome, while sex, eye color and use of eyeglasses or contact lenses did not have any effect on shade-matching results. To improve shade-matching skills, clinicians should participate in hands-on courses, continuing education classes and other training programs.
Article
Tooth color is determined by the paths of light inside the tooth and absorption along these paths. This paper tests the hypothesis that, since the paths are determined by scattering, a relation between color and scattering coefficients exists. One hundred and two extracted incisors were fixed in formalin, mounted in a standardized position in brass holders, and pumiced. A facet was prepared near the incisal edge on the labial plane to allow for Knoop hardness measurements with a 500-gram load. Light scattering by the enamel was measured in a 45 degrees/0 degrees geometry; light scattering by both enamel and dentin was measured in a 0 degrees/0 degrees geometry. The reflection spectrum of the tooth was measured from the labial plane with a spectroradiometer in a 45 degrees/0 degrees geometry, with standard illuminant A and standard illuminant D65. To include all volume-reflected light, we used entire-tooth illumination and small-area measurement. CIELAB color coordinates were calculated from the spectra. Neither spectra nor coordinates showed evidence of a contribution of fluorescence to tooth color. Averaged values and standard deviations for L*,a*,b* were 69.9 (4.1), 1.22 (1.4), and 17.9 (2.9), respectively. Both scattering coefficients averaged to 0.6 (0.4) mm-1; Knoop hardness number was, on average, 271 (39) kg/mm2. L* correlated with a* (r = -0.51), with the enamel scattering coefficient (r = 0.60), and slightly with hardness (r = 0.17, p = 0.03). The colors of 28 teeth from which the enamel was removed correlated strongly with the colors of the complete tooth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)