Conference PaperPDF Available

Abstract and Figures

Cider apple production is increasing in Washington State where an estimated 204 acres were produced in 2010 and 256 acres in 2011. Common cider apple varieties grown include Kingston Black, Yarlington Mill, Brown Snout, Dabinett, Porter's Perfection, among others. Fewer pesticide inputs are used for cider apples than for dessert apples, as minor surface blemishes are tolerated if yield and internal fruit quality are not affected. In western Washington cider apple production is not limited by environment-induced diseases (e.g., scab) which otherwise limit apple production and yields. The objective of this study was to provide information on (1) the costs of equipment, materials, supplies, and labor required to establish and produce a cider apple orchard in western Washington; and (2) the ranges of price and yield levels at which cider apple production would be a profitable enterprise. The study outlined baseline production assumptions for a 10-acre cider apple orchard based on input from producers, including a productive orchard life of 25 years, with four years of establishment and 21 years of full production; and crop yield of 5 bins/acre, 12 bins/acre and 46 bins/acre during Years 3, 4 and thereafter, respectively. Furthermore, the baseline price received for a 900-lb bin of cider apples was $315 ($0.35 per lb). Study findings indicated that a producer will start to receive positive net returns after four years. For a fully established cider apple orchard, a producer would expect about $2,400 per acre of net returns based on a yield of 46 bins/acre at $315/bin, and the break-even return was estimated at $263/bin ($0.29 per lb). The cost of investing in the cider apple orchard was estimated to be recovered after 14 years. Changing the price level while holding all else constant, the investment cost would not be recovered within the productive life of the orchard if the price received for cider apples was $290/bin ($0.32 per lb). At higher prices of $350/bin ($0.39 per lb) and $400/bin ($0.44 per lb), the estimated payback periods were 10.06 years and 7.71 years, respectively. Given the baseline yield, price and production costs, study results show that it would be economically feasible to produce cider apples in western Washington.
Content may be subject to copyright.
1
2013 Cost Estimation
of Establishing a
Cider Apple Orchard in
Western Washington
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION FACT SHEET • FS141E
Preface
Cider is fermented apple juice and is often called ‘hard
cider’ in the United States. However, worldwide, the term
‘cider’ is used most often to describe this fermented bever-
age and will also be the term used throughout this publi-
cation. The study results presented in this WSU fact sheet
can serve as a general guide for evaluating the feasibility of
establishing and producing cider apples in western Wash-
ington as of 2013. Specic assumptions were adopted for
use in this study, but these assumptions may not t every
situation since production costs and returns vary across
orchard operations, depending on the following factors:
Capital, labor, and natural resources
Crop yield
Cultural practices
Input prices
Orchard size
Cider apple prices
Management skills
Type and size of machinery and irrigation system
Cost estimations in this enterprise budget also vary
depending on the budget’s intended use. To avoid draw-
ing unwarranted conclusions for any particular orchard,
readers should closely examine the assumptions used in
this study, and adjust the data on costs and/or returns as
appropriate for their specic orchard operation.
Cider Apple Production in Washington
State
Common cider apple varieties grown in Washington
State include Kingston Black (photo shown above),
Yarlington Mill, Brown Snout, Dabinett, and Porter’s
Perfection, among others (Moulton et al. 2010). There
were an estimated 204 acres of cider apples produced
in Washington State in 2010 and 256 acres in 2011
(Northwest Agriculture Business Center informal survey
2013). Cider apples can be produced with fewer pesticide
inputs than dessert apples require since minor surface
blemishes are tolerated if yield and internal fruit quality
are not affected (Peck and Merwin 2008). Ciderapple
production in western Washington is not limited by
environmentally induced diseases (for example, scab),
which often limit fresh market apple production and yields
in this same region.
The volume of cider produced in the U.S. increased from
775,031 gallons in 2007 to 5.2 million gallons in 2012, a
nearly seven-fold increase, or a 54% increase on average for
each year during this six-year period. In Washington State,
the total volume of cider produced grew by 290% between
2007 and 2012, or 37% on average for each year during this
timeframe (Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau 2013).
To date, the Northwest Cider Association’s membership
includes 43 commercial cideries (21 in Washington; 18 in
Oregon; 1 in Montana; and 3 in British Columbia, Canada)
and 9 cider apple orchards (7 in Washington; 1 in Oregon;
and 1 in Montana). Cider is well suited for small-scale
artisanal producers in western Washington who rely on
local markets. Twelve of the association’s member cideries
and 2 member orchards are located in western Washington
(Northwest Cider Association 2014).
One of the major challenges commercial cider makers
face, both in western Washington and at a national level,
is the limited availability of the specialized apple varieties
required for making quality cider. Cider apples are sorted
into four categories (Cider Advisory Committee 1956):
bittersweet – high in tannin, low in acid; bittersharp
high in tannin, high in acid; sharp – low in tannin, high
in acid; and sweet – low in tannin, low in acid.
The bittersweet and bittersharp varieties are used to make
high quality, full-bodied ciders. Cider drinkers tend to
develop a more sophisticated palate that enables them to
appreciate the more complex avors of traditional ciders
(Merwin et al. 2008). When producing high quality cider,
several factors should be considered, including cider apple
varieties, fermentation procedures, and laboratory juice
analyses, among others. For more information on cider
apple production, including rootstock selection, pest man-
agement, harvest, and other cultural practices, see Hard
Cider Production and Orchard Management (Moulton et al.
2010).
2
As the production of cider continues to expand, the
demand for specialty cider apples will also expand (Mer-
winetal.2008). As such, growers will need reliable and
objective information on the costs of establishing and
producing apples for cider. This publication provides infor-
mation on the economic feasibility of establishing and
producing cider apples in western Washington, including
the cost of equipment, materials, supplies, and the labor
required to establish a producing cider apple orchard. It
also provides the price and yield levels needed to make
cider apple production a protable enterprise.
This fact sheet can be used to identify inputs, costs, and
yields that are considered typical of a well-managed cider
apple orchard in western Washington. This publication
does not represent any particular orchard operation and is
not intended to be a denitive guide to production prac-
tices. However, it does describe current industry trends
and can be helpful in estimating the physical and nan-
cial requirements associated with establishing a successful
cider-producing operation.
Sources of Information
The data used in this study were gathered from a group of
experienced cider apple producers in western Washington
and supplemented with information provided by scientists
at the WSU Mount Vernon Northwest Research and Exten-
sion Center (NWREC). The production practices and input
requirements adopted by the participating producers form
the basis for the assumptions used to develop this enterprise
budget. Additionally, the data provided reect the crop yield
and application rates of inputs these area producers antici-
pate over an apple orchard’s life, based on the established
assumptions and if no unforeseen failures occur. Given that
many factors affect cider apple production costs and returns,
individual producers are encouraged to use the Excel Work-
book provided to estimate their own costs and returns.
Budget Assumptions
This budget contains information on establishing and
producing apples for cider making and incorporates the
following assumptions:
1. Post-production costs, such as extended storage,
juicing, transportation to cidery, and pomace dis-
posal are not included in this budget.
2. The size of the orchard operation used in this bud-
get is 10 acres, and it assumes one acre is dedicated
to roads, buildings, storage, etc., rather than to
fruit production. Therefore, the total productive
area for this orchard is 9 acres. Table 1 shows the
assumed specications for the cider apple orchard.
3. The cider produced will be hard cider.
4. The total value of bare agricultural land (includ-
ing water rights) is $13,500 per acre with annual
property taxes of $135 per acre.
5. The orchard is drip irrigated using city water.
6. Producers sell apples within 2 weeks of harvest.
Apples are stored at the farm in pole barns with no
climate control.
7. The price received by cider apple producers is
$315/bin. This price is based on the median price
obtained by cider makers in western Washington
for locally grown cider apples.
8. Bins of cider apples weigh 900 pounds each.
9. Cultural tasks and harvest are done by hand.
10. Management is valued at $300 per acre.
11. Interest on investment is 5%.
Summary of Results
Table 2 shows the estimated annual cost and return for
growing cider apples in western Washington. Production
costs are split into variable costs and xed costs. Vari-
able costs include orchard operations, harvest activities,
materials, and maintenance and repairs. Fixed costs (costs
incurred whether cider apples are produced or not) include
depreciation on capital, interest, taxes, insurance, manage-
ment, and amortized establishment costs. Management is
treated as a xed cost rather than a variable cost because
management (like land) has been committed to the pro-
duction cycle of the crop.
This study assumes that cider apple trees achieve full
production in their fth year. Based on the given assump-
tions, the total production costs for cider apples during
full production are estimated at $12,920 per acre. Enter-
prise budget values given in Table 2 are based on the more
comprehensive cost data presented in Tables 3 through 5.
Table3 and Table 4 list the annual capital requirements
and the machinery and building requirements, respec-
tively. Interest and depreciation costs are listed in Tables 5
and6, respectively. Interest costs represent required return
on investments. These costs can be actual interest pay-
ments on funds borrowed to nance farm operations and
physical capital investments, or they can be an opportunity
cost, or a combination of the two.
All interest and amortized costs assume a 5% interest rate.
The amortized establishment costs assume a total produc-
tive orchard life of 25 years, which includes 4 years of
establishment and 21 years of full production. The amor-
tized establishment costs must be recaptured during the full
production years in order for an enterprise to be protable.
Depreciation costs (costs calculated based on loss of asset
value due to use, age, and/or obsolescence) are annual,
non-cash expenses that are calculated over an asset’s useful
life. Land and other xed capital costs are estimated based
on the entire 10-acre orchard operation. Cost estimates of
inputs related to direct production of cider apples are calcu-
lated on a per-acre basis for a total growing area of 9 acres
(see Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 of Excel workbook).
The estimated net returns (shown in Table 2) represent the
prots a producer may earn from investment in land and
management after all costs are subtracted, including any
labor the producer contributed to crop production. Break-
even net returns for different levels of cost recovery during
full production are presented in Table 7.
The rst breakeven return ($177/bin) is the amount required
to cover total variable costs. If the actual return received
3
is less than this amount, it will be unprotable to produce
cider apples. This is true even in the short run because the
increased costs of production are greater than the increased
returns. The second breakeven return ($185/bin) should
cover total cash costs, assuming no outstanding loans or
land rent. This breakeven return is the amount needed for
economical production in the short run.
The third breakeven return ($201/bin) is the amount
required to cover total cash costs and depreciation costs,
and must be realized to stay in business over the long run.
The nal breakeven return ($281/bin) is the total cost
breakeven return. It is only when this breakeven return is
received that the producer can recover all out-of-pocket
expenses, plus all opportunity costs. Not obtaining the
nal breakeven return means the producer will not receive
a return on capital contributions equal to what could have
been earned through an alternative investment. On the
other hand, receiving an actual return greater than the esti-
mated total cost breakeven return means that in addition
to covering all cash and opportunity costs, the producer
will receive a return for management and the risk assumed
in producing cider apples.
Crop yield and prices can vary from year to year. Therefore,
to be of use to potential investors, the assumptions under-
lying the estimates in this enterprise budget should be
carefully examined. This study assumed a production level
of 46 bins/acre during the mature production years (that is,
years 5 to 25). This level of production is what experienced
cider apple growers estimate to be an average based on this
study’s assumed production scenario and given annual
crop yield variability (variability due to biennial bearing,
extreme temperatures, and pest infestation, among others).
To further help users evaluate potential production scenar-
ios, Table 8 illustrates likely per-acre net returns for a fully
established orchard given different price and yield levels.
It is important to note that WSU enterprise budgets are
economic budgets (not cash budgets), which means they
take into account not only cash costs but also opportunity
costs. Opportunity costs are dened as revenue foregone
by not investing in the next best alternative that carries a
similar nancial risk; for example, investing money in the
stock market, or paying off an outstanding loan. If produc-
ers do not include the opportunity costs when they calcu-
late their total cost breakeven return, they will be unable
to correctly assess the protability of farming relative to
alternative uses of their resources.
Furthermore, the key results provided in this enterprise
budget are based on production-related assumptions
established for this study. Production costs and returns for
individual producers may differ, thus the results cannot be
generalized to represent the entire population of producers.
However, an interactive Excel Workbook, described below,
is provided as a supplementary reference for this enterprise
budget.
Excel Workbook
An Excel spreadsheet version of this enterprise budget
(Table 2) is available on the WSU SES Extension web page
for crop enterprise budgets at http://extecon.wsu.edu/pag-
es/Enterprise_Budgets. Associated data underlying the per-
acre cost calculations shown in Tables 3 through 8 (which
can be found in the appendix tables on establishment
costs, full production costs, salvage value, and deprecia-
tion costs) are also available on this web page, along with
an amortization calculator. Select “apples” in the “Com-
modity” drop-down menu where the publication for cider
apples will be listed. Copies of both the manuscript and
the Excel Workbook are available here. Growers can modify
select values and thus use the Excel Workbook to evaluate
their own production costs and returns.
Additional Cider Research Information
Washington State is poised to become the leader in cider
research and production in the U.S., and WSU Mount Ver-
non NWREC has one of the most active cider research and
education programs in the country. The cider block at WSU
NWREC includes 58 unique cider apple varieties, making it
the largest U.S. research orchard for cider apples in terms of
number of different varieties. Figure 1 shows Brown Snout
apples grown at WSU NWREC, one of the most popular
cider apple varieties. This photo provides a view of the tree
architecture and crop load described in this budget. More
information about cider research at WSU and in the U.S.
can be found on the following website: http://extension.
wsu.edu/maritimefruit/pages/cider.aspx#research.
Figure 1. Brown Snout variety is one of the cider apple
varieties grown at WSU NWREC.
4
References
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau. 2013. Cider
Statistics CY 2007–2012. Washington, DC.
Cider Advisory Committee. 1956. Revised List of
Recommended Varieties of Cider.
Apples. In Cider Advisory Committee Report. Bristol, England:
Long Ashton Research Station.
Merwin, I.A., S. Valois, and O. Padilla-Zakour. 2008. Cider
Apples and Cider-Making Techniques in Europe and
North America. HortReviews 34: 365–414.
Moulton, G., C. Miles, J. King, and A. Zimmerman. 2010.
Hard Cider Production and Orchard Management.
Washington State University Extension Publication
PNW621.
Northwest Cider Association. 2014. Association Members.
http://www.nwcider.com/.
Peck, G.M., and I.A. Merwin. 2008. Organic and Integrated
Fruit Production Systems for the Northeastern US
(Abstract) HortScience 43(4): 1111.
Table 1. Cider apple orchard specications.
Total cider apple orchard application 10 acres
Production area 9 acres
Cider apple variety Several varieties (e.g., Kingston Black, Yarlington Mill, Brown Snout, Dabinett, Porter’s
Perfection, Vilberie, Foxwelp)
Root stock DwarfM9 series
Architecture Central leader system
In-row spacing 5 feet
Between row spacing 12 feet
Commercial life of planting 25 years
Tree density/acre 726 trees
5
Table 2. Cost and returns per acre of establishing and producing cider apples in western Washington.
Establishment Years Full Production[1]
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Your Costs
Estimated Gross Production (bins/acre) 5.00 12.00 46.00
Estimated Price ($/bin) 315.00 315.00 315.00
Total Returns ($/acre) 1,575.00 3,780.00 14,490.00
Variable Costs ($/acre)
Establishment
Soil Preparation 500.00
Trees (including labor) 5,263.50
Orchard Activities
Pruning & Training[2] 288.00 720.00 1,080.00 1,440.00 1,260.00
Green Fruit Thinning[3] 144.00 288.00 576.00 576.00
Irrigation Labor[4] 480.00 480.00 480.00 480.00 480.00
Chemicals[4],[5] 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00 350.00
Fertilizer[5] 60.00 60.00 60.00 248.00
Manual Pest Control[6] 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 120.00
Beehive 50.00 50.00 50.00
General Farm Labor[7] 180.00 180.00 180.00 180.00 180.00
Irrigation/Electric Charge 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00 144.00
Harvest Activities[8]
Picking Labor 405.00 972.00 3,726.00
Maintenance and Repairs
Machinery Repair 50.00 75.00 100.00 120.00 140.00
Fuel & Lube 70.00 70.00 110.00 130.00 140.00
Irrigation System Maintenance 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Other Variable Costs
Overhead (5% of VC) 374.78 119.65 170.85 233.60 373.20
Interest (5% of VC)[9] 393.51 125.63 179.39 245.28 293.90
Total Variable Costs 8,263.79 2,638.28 3,767.24 5,150.88 8,131.10
Fixed Costs ($/acre)
Depreciation
Irrigation System 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Machinery, Equipment & Building 539.76 539.76 539.76 539.76 539.76
Trellis 90.51 90.51 90.51 90.51 90.51
Interest
Irrigation System 62.50 62.50 62.50 62.50 62.50
Land 675.00 675.00 675.00 675.00 675.00
Machinery, Equipment & Building 432.35 432.35 432.35 432.35 432.35
Trellis 56.57 56.57 56.57 56.57 56.57
Establishment Costs (5%) 545.27 836.54 1,120.06
Other Fixed Costs
Miscellaneous Supplies 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00 200.00
Land & Property Taxes 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00 135.00
Insurance Cost (all farm) 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 50.00
Management Cost 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
Amortized Establishment Costs[10] 2,147.53
Total Fixed Costs 2,641.70 3,186.97 3,478.23 3,761.76 4,789.23
TOTAL COSTS 10,905 5,825 7,245 8,913 12,920
ESTIMATED NET RETURNS (10,905) (5,825) (5,670) (5,133) 1,570
Accumulated Establishment Costs 10,905.49 16,730.74 22,401.21 27,533.85
[1]The full production year is representative of all the remaining years the orchard is in full production (Year 5 to Year 25).
[2]Hand labor rate is $12/hour in Year 1 and $15/hour in subsequent years.
[3]For pruning and training, hand labor rate is $12/hour in Year 1 and $15/hour in subsequent years. For green fruit thinning, hand labor rate is $12/hour. Labor rate includes all applicable taxes
and benets.
[4]Irrigation labor and chemical application are $12/hour and include all applicable taxes and benets.
[5]Includes materials and labor.
[6]Hand removal of pests, including tent caterpillars.
[7]General farm labor rate is a lump sum per acre and applied to miscellaneous/all other labor. Rate includes applicable taxes and benets.
[8]Hand labor. Picking rate = $60/bin.
[9]Interest expense on full year during establishment years and for 3/4 of a year during full production.
[10]Represents the costs incurred during the establishment years (minus revenues during those years) that must be recaptured during the full production years.
6
Table 3. Summary of annual capital requirements for a cider apple orchard operation (10 acres) in western Washington.
Establishment Years Full
Production[1],[2]
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3[1] Year 4[1]
Annual Requirements ($)
Irrigation System 22,500
Land 135,000
Machinery, Equipment & Building 153,940
Trellis System 20,366
Operating Expenses 80,539 29,910 40,070 52,523 79,345
Total Requirements ($) 389,845 29,910 40,070 52,523 79,345
Receipts ($)[3] 14,175 34,020 130,410
Net Requirements ($) 389,845 29,910 25,895 18,503 (51,065)
[1]The gross yield of cider apples from Year 3 to Full Production is 5 bins/ac, 12 bins/ac, and 46 bins/ac, respectively.
[2]The full production year is representative of all the remaining years the orchard is in full production (Year 5 to Year 25).
[3]Price received is assumed at $315/bin.
Table 4. Machinery, equipment, and building requirements for a cider apple orchard operation (10 acres) in western
Washington.
Machine/Equipment/Building Size or Description
Market Value of Machinery/Equipment/Building
Number of
Units
Purchase Price
($/Unit)[4]
Total Cost ($)
Tractor 50 hp 1 25,000 25,000
Sprayer Air blast sprayer, 100 gal 1 4,500 4,500
Weed sprayer boom & tank 1 4,000 4,000
Mower, rotary 6 ft 1 3,500 3,500
Fork lift 5000 lb, gas-powered 1 22,000 22,000
Pickup truck 3/4 ton, 4 WD, extended cab 1 30,000 30,000
Bin trailer 8 ft x 16 ft 1 6,000 6,000
Ladders 8 ft unit 2 120 240
Fence 1 6,600 6,600
Bins[1] Plastic, 900 lb 46 350 16,100
Shop tools, used[2] 1 6,000 6,000
Machine shop/pole barn[3] 1 30,000 30,000
Total 153,940
[1]Number of units correspond to the number of bins of cider apples during fall production.
[2]Includes tools for equipment maintenance, trellis building, irrigation maintenance.
[3]Includes pesticide storage.
[4]Purchase price corresponds to new machinery, equipment, or building.
7
Table 5. Interest costs per acre for a cider apple orchard in western Washington.
Total Purchase
Price ($)
Salvage Value
($)[1]
Number of
Acres
Total Interest
Cost ($)
Interest Cost
Per Acre ($)
Irrigation System 22,500 0 9 563 62.50
Land[1] 135,000 N/A 10 6,750 675.00
Machinery, Equipment & Building [2] 153,940 19,000 10 4,324 432.35
Trellis 20,366 0 9 509 56.57
Interest Rate 5.0%
Interest Cost is calculated as: (Total Purchase Price + Salvage Value)/2 x Interest Rate.
[1]N/A—Salvage value is not applicable to land because land is not a depreciable asset.
[2]See Appendix 3 in the Excel workbook at http://extecon.wsu.edu/pages/Enterprise_Budgets for a detailed calculation of the salvage value.
The irrigation system and trellis system are used for the direct production of the fruit. Hence, their respective interest costs are divided by the
production area (9 acres) to get the interest cost per acre.
Total land area of the orchard operation is 10 acres and machinery, equipment, and building are used in the entire orchard. Thus, the corre-
sponding interest costs are divided by the total area (10 acres) to derive the interest cost per acre.
Table 6. Depreciation costs per acre for a cider apple orchard in western Washington.
Total Purchase
Price ($)
Number of
Acres
Total Value Per
Acre ($) Years of Use
Depreciation Cost
Per Acre ($/yr)
Irrigation System 22,500 9 2,500.00 25 100.00
Machinery, Equipment & Building 153,940 10 15,394.00 25 539.76
Trellis 20,366 9 2,262.87 25 90.51
The depreciation cost is calculated as straight line depreciation: (Total Purchase Price Salvage Value)/Years of Use.
Table 7. Breakeven return ($/bin) at different levels of enterprise costs during full production in western Washington.
Cost ($/acre)
Breakeven Return
($/bin)[1]
Your Cost
($/acre)
Your Breakeven
Return ($/bin)
1. Total Variable Costs 8,131.10 176.76[2]
2. Total Cash Costs 8,516.10 185.13[3]
= Total Variable Costs + Land &
Property Taxes + Insurance Cost
+ Miscellaneous Supplies
3. Total Cash Costs + Depreciation
Costs 9,246.37 201.01[4]
4. Total Cost
= Total Cash Costs +
Depreciation Costs + Interest
Costs + Management Cost 12,920.32 280.88[5]
Assumed yield (bins/acre) = 46
Assumed price per bin = $315
[1]Breakeven return is calculated as cost divided by yield.
[2]If the return is below this level, cider apples are uneconomical to produce.
[3]The second breakeven return allows the producer to stay in business in the short run.
[4]The third breakeven return allows the producer to stay in business in the long run.
[5]The fourth breakeven return is the total cost breakeven return. Only when this breakeven return is received can the grower recover all
out-of-pocket expenses plus opportunity costs.
8
By Suzette P. Galinato, Research Associate, IMPACT Center, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA; R. Karina Gallardo,
Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, School of Economic Sciences, Center for Precision and Automated Agricultural Systems, WSU Puyallup
Research and Extension Center, Puyallup, WA; and Carol A. Miles, Professor and Vegetable Extension Specialist, Department of Horticulture, WSU Mount
Vernon Northwest Research and Extension Center, Mount Vernon, WA.
Copyright 2014 Washington State University
WSU Extension bulletins contain material written and produced for public distribution. Alternate formats of our educational materials are available upon
request for persons with disabilities. Please contact Washington State University Extension for more information.
You may download copies of this and other publications from WSU Extension at http://pubs.wsu.edu.
Issued by Washington State University Extension and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in furtherance of the Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension
programs and policies are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations on nondiscrimination regarding race, sex, religion, age, color, creed, and
national or ethnic origin; physical, mental, or sensory disability; marital status or sexual orientation; and status as a Vietnam-era or disabled veteran. Evidence
of noncompliance may be reported through your local WSU Extension ofce. Trade names have been used to simplify information; no endorsement is
intended. Published September 2014.
FS141E
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the WSU CSANR BIOAg Grant Program for funding this study. The authors also wish to thank
Gary Moulton, David Bauermeister, Drew Zimmerman, Jacky King, Gayle Sterrett, and Jonathan Roozen for their assis-
tance in gathering baseline information, and the WSU Extension Publication reviewers for their helpful comments. Assis-
tance provided by cider apple producers in developing the enterprise budget is also greatly appreciated.
Table 8. Estimated net returns[1] ($) per acre at various prices and yields of cider apples during full production in western
Washington.
Gross Yield
(bins/acre)[2]
Price ($/bin)
300 320 340 360 380 400
20 -4,626 -4,226 -3,826 -3,426 -3,026 -2,626
25 -3,567 -3,067 -2,567 -2,067 -1,567 -1,067
30 -2,508 -1,908 -1,308 -708 -108 492
35 -1,450 -750 -50 650 1,350 2,050
40 -391 409 1,209 2,009 2,809 3,609
45 668 1,568 2,468 3,368 4,268 5,168
50 1,727 2,727 3,727 4,727 5,727 6,727
Shaded area denotes a prot based on the combination of yield and price.
[1]Net returns take into account out-of-pocket expenses and opportunity costs.
[2]Assumes a 900-pound bin.
... C ider apples (Malus ×domestica) are an emerging crop in the United States, and cider apple orchard management generally follows the same guidelines as that for dessert apples (Fitzgerald et al., 2013;Moulton et al., 2010). Pruning is commonly done by hand and can represent %20% to 25% of labor costs or 10% of annual operating costs in a cider apple orchard (Galinato et al., 2014). Limited access to workers with pruning experience in addition to rising wages can create a financial barrier for cider apple orchard establishment and maintenance (Clark, 2017;Moulton and King, 2015;Roper, 2005;Whiting et al., 2015). ...
... Mechanical hedging is a form of nonselective heading pruning that can reduce summer pruning costs as fewer employees can prune an orchard in less time than for hand pruning. The cost to hand prune a cider orchard in full production is %$1260/acre, and the cost of a hedger ranges from about $10,000 to $18,000 (Galinato et al., 2014(Galinato et al., , 2022. The hedger is mounted on a tractor and consists of a vertical cutter bar or discs and may also include an additional horizontal blade that simultaneously tops the trees (Sansavini, 1978). ...
Article
Full-text available
Mechanical hedging was evaluated at Washington State University Northwestern Washington Research and Extension Center, Mount Vernon, WA, in 2019 and 2020 on eight cider apple ( Malus × domestica ) cultivars with four bearing habits: tip—Golden Russet, Harrison; spur—Brown Snout, Cap of Liberty; semispur—Tom Putt, Campfield; and crab—Puget Spice, Hewe’s Virginia Crab. Trees were planted on ‘Geneva 935’ ( Malus hybrid ) rootstock in one replicate block in 2014 and the second replicate block in 2016 and the central leader of all trees was headed in 2017 to equalize tree size and stage of development. Summer hedging was carried out on all cultivars on 16 July in 2019 and 7 July in 2020. The response of different cultivars was evaluated both years by measuring canopy area removed, shoot biomass removed, and fruit removed, and the amount of time to hedge was measured. Additionally, fruit diameter and fruit yield per tree were measured at harvest both years, and fruit weight was measured at harvest only in 2020. The hedger traveled at an average speed of 1.32 mph; it took 6 seconds on average to hedge both sides of one tree when in-row spacing was 6 ft and took 1.25 minutes to maneuver around the end of a row. The estimated time to hedge 1 acre was 1.45 hours when the hedger traveled at 116 ft/min and the orchard had 10 rows spaced 12 ft apart. Biomass removed on an area and weight basis was less in 2020 than in 2019, whereas yield per tree was 2.6 times greater in 2020 than 2019, and cultivars within a bearing habit differed in these responses to hedging both years. Fruit damaged by the hedger was assessed but observed to be negligible for all cultivars. Yield per tree was negatively correlated with fruit diameter ( P < 0.001) and positively correlated with the number of fruit removed per tree ( P < 0.025). Further research is needed to assess the long-term effects of hedging on biomass removal, yield, and biennialism to determine whether summer mechanical hedging is a cost-effective and suitable method for managing cider apple orchards.
... Orchard establishment and maintenance can be especially costly in regions where there are limited numbers of workers with apple pruning and harvest experience and where wages are high (Clark, 2017). For example, pruning of high-density cider apple orchards represented 20% to 25% of annual labor costs and hand harvest accounted for 46% of the total annual variable costs for a cider apple orchard in full production in western Washington (Galinato et al., 2014). ...
... Full production is achieved during the sixth year in both systems (Year 6). The timing of harvest is based on input from cider apple growers in Galinato et al. (2014) and Galinato and Miles (2017). Different cropping systems (rootstocks, training systems, and densities) will reach first harvest at different times and have different maximum potentials, but generally they achieve their full production at the same time (Robinson, 2004). ...
Article
Full-text available
Growers need reliable information on costs and returns they can expect for a cider apple ( Malus × domestica ) orchard suitable for mechanization because specialty cider apples can only be used for making cider, and returns are expected to be lower than for fresh table apples. This study estimates the costs, returns, and net profit that growers may realize by planting cider apples in either a freestanding or tall spindle system that use a mechanical harvester (both systems) and mechanical hedger (tall spindle system only). Results show that both production systems have positive net returns during full production, and their respective break-even returns are lower than the current market price, demonstrating that both systems are potentially profitable investments. Results also show that the tall spindle system is potentially more profitable due to the advantages of earlier start of fruiting and higher crop yield. The estimated net returns of the tall spindle system during full production are nearly 4 times higher than that of a freestanding system. At a discount rate of 10%, the net present value (NPV) of the tall spindle system is positive and payback period is 13 years, whereas the NPV of the freestanding system is negative. The discount rate represents the time value of money and reflects the perception of risk for the investment. The break-even discount rates (i.e., NPV = 0) are ≈6.88% for the freestanding system and 10.78% for the tall spindle system. Sensitivity scenarios found that when all else was constant, profitability increased as market price, crop yield, and production area increase and also when the cost of the harvester decreased. Because mechanical harvesters are expensive, profitability tends to be more favorable for larger farms due to economies of scale. Also, a high picking efficiency is important because fruit that falls on the ground is considered crop yield loss and reduces the gross income from cider apples.
... Economic feasibility of dragon fruit cultivated in rocky basaltic terrain using different trench soils was computed in term of annual total cost includes both variable and fixed costs, net profit (return) and benefit cost ratio and payback period (Galinato et al., 2014). In estimating variable cost, investments made on establishing orchard, cultivation practices, harvest, packaging and marketing activities, overhead charges and capital interest were calculated. ...
Article
Full-text available
Agricultural crops especially fruit trees are constrained by edaphic stresses in shallow soils with low water retention and poor fertility. Therefore, interventions of shifting to trench planting for better root anchorage and replacing the filling soil were evaluated for 8 years in dragon fruit (Hylocereus undatus) cultivated in Deccan Plateau of peninsular India. When averaged for last 5-years, 44% higher fruit yield (18.2±1.0 Mg ha⁻¹) was harvested from trees planted in trenches filled with 1:1 mixture (T-mixed) of native soil (loamy sand with 26.7% stones (> 2mm), field capacity, FC 0.20 cm³ cm⁻³ ; organic carbon, OC 0.17%; Av-N 54.6 kg ha⁻¹) and a black soil (clay 54.4%; FC 0.42 cm³ cm⁻³ OC 0.70%; Av-N 157.1 kg ha⁻¹) than the recommended pit planting (12.4±1.2 Mg ha⁻¹). Improvements in fruit yields with trenches filled with black (T-black) and native (T-native) soil were 32 and 13%, respectively. Yield losses (total– marketable yield) were reduced by 40, 20 and 18% over pit method with T- mixed, T-black and T-native soil, respectively. Marketable quality attributes like fruit weight, fruit size metrics and pulp/peel content were further improved under T-mixed soil. Accumulation of total soluble solid (TSS), sugar content, phenolic and flavonoid compounds were higher in fruits from T-native soil. During storage, fruits from T-native soil and pit planting exhibited minimum physiological weight loss and retained more firmness, TSS, sugars, titratable acidity, phenolic flavonoids contents, FARP and DPPH activities. T-mixed soil provided better hydrozone and nutrients for resilience of fruit plants while protecting from aeration problems envisaged in poorly drained black soils. With B:C ratio (1.85) and lower payback period (4-years), T-mixed soil showed superior economic viability. Therefore, soil management module of planting in trenches filled-in with mixture of native and black soils can be recommended to boost productivity of fruits from shallow soils under water scarce degraded regions without penalising agro-ecosystem.
... For apple orchard operations, profitability is influenced by installation and operational costs, fruit yield, and the price of the produce. Case studies in Washington, New York, and Virginia have provided growers with feasibility assessments of producing cider apples, as well as estimates of operating costs and returns (Farris et al., 2013;Galinato et al., 2014;Peck and Knickerbocker, 2018). Key cider apple growers and industry experts in these states were surveyed to develop baseline budgets that reflect the local environmental and economic conditions (Table 1). ...
Article
Full-text available
Hard cider, made by fermenting apple ( Malus × domestica ) juice, was at one time the most widely consumed alcoholic beverage in America. Largely abandoned after Prohibition, within the past 2 decades the rise in popularity of craft beverages has led to the reemergence of hard cider as an alternative to beer, wine, and spirits. Today, hard cider represents one of the fastest growing sectors within the craft beverage industry. The recent interest in cider presents additional marketing opportunities for apple growers and businesses currently involved in, or considering entering, the apple cider or craft beverages industries. However, the lack of a strong history or experience in selecting, producing, and using cider apples poses a significant challenge to this emerging market. This article reviews the current state of research in cider apple production, including economic feasibility, mechanized management, and cultivar evaluation and improvement.
... In agriculture, production costs and productivity are also associated with crop yields to measure output and show a great incidence on commodities' prices. For apples production, several studies evaluate the impact of capital, labor, fixed costs and technology on apple productivity (Peck et al., 2006;Peck and Merwin, 2010;Kireeti and Guleria, 2015;Galinato et al., 2015;Galinato and Miles, 2017). However these studies do not consider the relationship to quality and prices. ...
Article
Full-text available
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the main factors and mechanisms that govern the price of cider, and to apply the analysis to the price of ciders in the Province of Québec, Canada. Design/methodology/approach The analysis is following the methodology applied to the determinants of the price of wine. A model for the price of cider is estimated with 70 prices representing five regions and five types of products. Findings The analysis is limited to one geographical factor, i.e. the region of origin and factors related to the producer, i.e. the age and the size of the firm. The results conclude on the importance of geographical factors related to the region of origin. The relationship between the price of ciders and the region of origin is statistically significant at the 1 percent level for two regions and shows a high premium for ciders produced in these two regions. Production factors related to the age and the size of the production unit although showing the expected sign are not statistically significant to conclude on the impact. There is a small premium for producing effervescent cider compared to still or rosé cider but the most statistically significant results at a 1 percent level are for ice ciders and fortified ciders which are two typical products from Québec. Research limitations/implications The analysis has important potential implications on the role of certification of origin. Cider regions in Québec, Canada have recently defined quality standards applied to specialties like Ice cider and Fire ciders. The choice of high quality products is reflected in the premium associated to the price of these products. Originality/value Contrary to the wine sector, there is a lack of research and literature on the determinants of the price of ciders. This study is the first to propose a pricing model to examine some of the determinants of prices.
... In agriculture, production costs and productivity are also associated with crop yields to measure output and it has a great incidence on commodities' prices. For apples production, several studies evaluate the impact of capital, labor, fixed costs and technology on apple productivity (Peck et al., 2006;Peck and Merwin, 2008;Kireeti and Guleria, 2015;Galinato et al., 2015;Galinato and Miles, 2017). However these studies do not consider the relationship to quality and prices. ...
Article
The objective of the paper is to investigate the main factors and mechanisms that govern the price of cider and to apply the analysis to the price of ciders in the Province of Québec, Canada. The analysis is following the methodology applied to the determinants of the price of wine. A model for the price of cider is estimated with 70 prices representing five regions and five types of products. The analysis is limited to 1) one geographical factor, i.e. the region of origin and 2) factors related to the producer, i.e. the age and the size of the firm. The results conclude on the importance of geographical factors related to the region of origin. The relationship between the price of ciders and the region of origin is statistically significant at the 1% level for two regions and shows a high premium for ciders produced in these two regions. Production factors related to the age and the size of the production unit although showing the expected sign are not statistically significant to conclude on the impact. There is a small premium for producing effervescent cider compared to still or rosé cider but the most statistically significant results at a 1% level are for ice ciders and fortified ciders which are two typical products from Québec. The analysis has important potential implications on the role of certification of origin. Cider regions in Québec, Canada have recently defined quality standards applied to specialities like Ice cider and Fire ciders. The choice of high quality products is reflected in the premium associated to the price of these products.
... Pruning & training and green fruit thinning are low in productivity due to intensive use of ladders, as activities (e.g., ladder moving and descending a ladder) are not directly related to work. With the assistance of harvest platforms, however, work productivity could be improved significantly by eliminating time wasting activities (e.g., moving and climbing up a ladder) is saved [28,31] . ...
Article
Full-text available
An increasing number of U.S. apple growers are now interested in using harvest platforms to increase harvest productivity, expand labor pool, and alleviate tough working conditions. To maximize benefits, functions of thinning, pruning & training, and infield sorting have been or are to be incorporated into harvest platforms. Though growers are most concerned with economic benefits, few cost-benefit studies had been conducted on different platforms. In the meantime, economic analysis procedure is complex and each analysis is for one specific machine (not for general purposes). No software program has been developed as a general and ready-to-use tool for growers and researchers for the platform economic analysis. In this study, platforms, both available on the marketplace and developed in lab as pilot trials, were reviewed. Costs and benefits models were then established, based on which multi-purpose apple harvest platform economic evaluation software (iMPAHP) was developed (capable of evaluating a wide variety of apple harvest platforms). A case study (machine cost of $100 000, accommodating 6 workers, processing apple incidence of 10% with 90% sort-out rate, and harvest, thinning, and pruning & training productivity increase at 40%, 50%, and 60%, respectively) based on iMPAHP demonstrated that infield sorting, harvest, thinning, and pruning & training accounted for 48.4%, 23.9%, 14.3%, and 13.4% of the total benefits, respectively. In the case that the platform was in all-four-purpose-application, the net present value (NPV) analysis of a 10-year investment showed a positive return of $60 547. However, without infield sorting function, the NPV resulted in a negative value, indicating a loss for the machine investment. Though incorporating the modular infield sorting system certainly increased the overall machine investment by $30 000, the benefits outweighed the costs.
Article
Full-text available
Chapter
Filling apples into a bin in the field is a bottleneck for apple production mechanization. Though a lot of bin fillers have been developed and commercially adopted, a majority are for indoor packinghouse use, which could not meet the infield requirement due to their large size, complexity, and high cost. An automatic bin filler was developed but did not result in satisfactory performance. This study focused on identifying the reasons for the poor performance of the bin filler and made improvements. The high apple bruising incidence was caused by the apple collision at the pair of foam rollers, high velocity when fruit exiting from the pinwheel, and insufficient compartments to hold one apple by one compartment. The uneven fruit distributions were mainly caused by the short pads. A second version bin filler was constructed by adding a pair of foam rollers at the top of the bin filler, adding the pinwheel compartments number from four to nine, attaching soft foams at the pads, and replacing the short pads with long ones. Experimental results showed that the second version bin filler would generate minimal apple bruising (<2%). An innovative method for quantitatively analyzing apple distributions in the bin was developed, validated, and future applied in this study. The second version bin filler distributed apples more evenly in the bin over the first version bin filler. The second version bin filler, due to its satisfactory performance, has a chance for commercial infield application.
Article
Full-text available
The use of bio-based fertilizers derived from dairy manure can provide a valuable source of fertility, improve soil health and provide an outlet for manure from dairy operations. We conducted a small-scale discrete choice survey of crop farmers and crop consultants in Washington State to determine the attributes that were important to them in the potential use of a bio-based fertilizer product derived from dairy manure. Of the attributes examined, distribution channel was not statistically significant. Respondents preferred air-dried or pelletized forms to wet forms, though there was no statistically significant difference between air-dried and pelletized forms. As expected, uptake increased as price decreased. Our results imply that respondents would be willing to pay 23 and 39% more for an air-dried or pelletized product, respectively, than for a ‘semi-wet’ product. Our results indicate that there are other important attributes beyond the ones in the survey that led respondents to stay with their current fertilizer regime. Qualitative responses in the survey pointed to the need for field trial results and data on nitrogen release from the bio-based fertilizer. Greater understanding of willingness-to-pay and attributes important to potential end users is important for the development of markets for bio-based fertilizers.
Article
Full-text available
Introduction Orchard Systems for Cider Apples National and Regional Cider Cultures and Cultivars Literature Cited
Hard Cider Production and Orchard Management
  • G Moulton
  • C Miles
  • J King
  • A Zimmerman
Moulton, G., C. Miles, J. King, and A. Zimmerman. 2010. Hard Cider Production and Orchard Management. Washington State University Extension Publication PNW621.
Organic and Integrated Fruit Production Systems for the Northeastern US
  • G M Peck
  • I A Merwin
Peck, G.M., and I.A. Merwin. 2008. Organic and Integrated Fruit Production Systems for the Northeastern US (Abstract) HortScience 43(4): 1111.