ArticlePublisher preview available

"Hot-Headed" Is More Than an Expression: The Embodied Representation of Anger in Terms of Heat

Authors:
To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.

Abstract

Anger is frequently referred to in terms of heat-related metaphors (e.g., hot-headed). The metaphoric representation perspective contends that such metaphors are not simply a poetic means of expressing anger but actually reflect the manner in which the concept of anger is cognitively represented. Drawing upon this perspective, the present studies examined the idea that the cognitive representation of anger is systematically related to the cognitive representation of heat. A total of 7 studies, involving 438 participants, provided support for this view. Visual depictions of heat facilitated the use of anger-related conceptual knowledge, and this occurred in tasks involving lexical stimuli as well as facial expressions. Furthermore, priming anger-related thoughts led participants to judge unfamiliar cities and the actual room temperature as hotter in nature. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for embodied views of emotion concepts and their potential social consequences.
“Hot-Headed” Is More Than an Expression: The Embodied Representation
of Anger in Terms of Heat
Benjamin M. Wilkowski
University of Wyoming Brian P. Meier
Gettysburg College
Michael D. Robinson
North Dakota State University Margaret S. Carter
Gettysburg College
Roger Feltman
University of Rochester
Anger is frequently referred to in terms of heat-related metaphors (e.g., hot-headed). The metaphoric
representation perspective contends that such metaphors are not simply a poetic means of expressing
anger but actually reflect the manner in which the concept of anger is cognitively represented. Drawing
upon this perspective, the present studies examined the idea that the cognitive representation of anger is
systematically related to the cognitive representation of heat. A total of 7 studies, involving 438
participants, provided support for this view. Visual depictions of heat facilitated the use of anger-related
conceptual knowledge, and this occurred in tasks involving lexical stimuli as well as facial expressions.
Furthermore, priming anger-related thoughts led participants to judge unfamiliar cities and the actual
room temperature as hotter in nature. The results are discussed in terms of their implications for
embodied views of emotion concepts and their potential social consequences.
Keywords: anger, heat, metaphor, embodiment, social cognition
When speaking about anger, people from multiple cultures
spontaneously employ heat-related metaphors (Ko¨vecses, 2000).
For example, English speakers refer to anger in terms of one’s
blood “boiling” (Lakoff, 1987). Similarly, speakers of Tunisian
Arabic describe their anger using phrases like “your make my
brain burn” (Maalej, 2004), and Japanese speakers use similar
phrases like “my head got hot” (Ko¨vecses, 2000). It is also notable
that anger-induced aggression is referred to as an “explosion,” and
successfully controlling one’s anger is conceptualized in terms of
“keeping one’s cool” (Lakoff, 1987).
Traditionally, it has been thought that such metaphors are
merely a convenient means of expressing abstract ideas (e.g.,
Fainsilber & Ortony, 1989). However, this position has recently
been challenged in psycholinguistic circles. Lakoff (1987); Gibbs
(1994), and others (e.g., Ko¨vecses, 2000) contend that anger-
related metaphors capture something important and basic to the
manner in which abstract concepts are cognitively represented.
Metaphors are specifically seen as useful in grounding abstract
concepts (e.g., anger) in terms of concrete physical experiences
(e.g., heat). When a child begins to learn the difference between
emotional experiences, communicating such differences can be
inherently difficult. Consider the following dialogue sequence
from the TV show, Star Trek: The Next Generation (Taylor,
Moore, & Singer, 1993), in which the android (i.e., robot) char-
acter, Data, is attempting to discern if he has felt anger for the first
time ever:
GEORDI: Data . . . no offense, but how would you know an actual
flash of anger from some kind of odd power surge?
DATA: You are correct in that I have no frame of reference to confirm
my hypothesis. . . Perhaps you could describe what it feels like when
you get angry . . . I could then use that as a reference.
GEORDI: Well . . . when I get angry, first I. . . begin to feel . . .
hostile. . .
DATA: Could you describe feeling hostile?
GEORDI: It’s like feeling . . . belligerent. . . combative. . .
DATA: Can you describe feeling angry without referring to other
feelings?
GEORDI: No. I guess I can’t. I just . . . feel angry.
Benjamin M. Wilkowski, University of Wyoming; Brian P. Meier,
Gettysburg College; Michael D. Robinson, North Dakota State University;
Margaret S. Carter, Gettysburg College; Roger Feltman, University of
Rochester.
The first author acknowledges support from NSF’s Experimental Pro-
gram to Stimulate Competitive Research (NSF/EPSCoR). The second
author acknowledges the support of students (Maura Downey, Kate Har-
grove, Dave Hauser, Alicia Kelly, Claire Kelly, Anna Markowtiz, Andrew
Mitchell, Brita Robson, Matt Salter, Sarah Sherman, Megan Tanguay, and
Lauren Von Heill) from his Spring, 2007 Experimental Social Psychology
course at Gettysburg College.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Benjamin
M. Wilkowski, University of Wyoming, Department of Psychology, Depart-
ment 3415, 1000 East University Avenue, Laramie, WY 82071. E-mail:
BWilkows@uwyo.edu
Emotion © 2009 American Psychological Association
2009, Vol. 9, No. 4, 464– 477 1528-3542/09/$12.00 DOI: 10.1037/a0015764
464
This document is copyrighted by the American Psychological Association or one of its allied publishers.
This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly.
... This was surprising, as previous work has shown that women who label themselves as "feminists" are seen by others as "less warm" (Bashir et al. 2013;Meijs et al. 2019). A possible explanation for this could be related to the embodied representation of warriors and particularly "anger" in terms of heat (e.g., Wilkowski et al. 2009). Heat-related metaphors are commonly used in reference to angry subjects (e.g., "hot-headed" in English, or the Spanish "calentarse" (tr. to become hot-headed). ...
... Heat-related metaphors are commonly used in reference to angry subjects (e.g., "hot-headed" in English, or the Spanish "calentarse" (tr. to become hot-headed). From an embodied cognition perspective, Wilkowski et al. (2009) argue that "the metaphoric representation perspective contends that such metaphors [heat-related ones] are not simply a poetic means of expressing anger but actually reflect the manner in which the concept of anger is cognitively represented" ...
Article
Metaphors influence general attitudes towards political and social ideas (Otieno et al. 2016). In particular, war metaphors are very common in political discourse. Their framing effects, however, depend on the context in which war metaphors are used, rendering positive or negative outcomes (Flusberg et al. 2018; Thibodeau, 2018). Reali (2021) explored metaphorical framing of feminism and women in feminism-related news in online media in Spanish, finding that war metaphors depicting women as warriors fighting for their rights were the most prevalent ones. Here, we use an experimental paradigm to explore whether the use of war metaphors affects the perception of issues defended by the feminist movements. Spanish-speaking participants were exposed to a vignette describing a hypothetical case of elective abortion. Two variables were manipulated in a 2X2 between-subjects design: 1.the use of warfare framing (war metaphors/neutral frames), and 2.the use of inclusive language in Spanish (gender inclusive/gender neutral language). Additionally, participants´ sociodemographic data were collected. A series of regression analyses showed an effect of metaphorical framing on the perception of the right to decide, perception of the partner´s right to opine, and the perception of the main character´s coldness when controlling for sociodemographic variables. The use of inclusive language had little effect on perception. Consistent with previous findings, sociodemographic factors strongly affected perception: men, and conservative and religious participants rated the right to decide lower, and character´s coldness as higher.
... People who frequently behave aggressively can be called "hot-headed," and those who temporarily act in a hostile manner are described by themselves and others as "being heated." Research has even demonstrated that impulsive and risky behaviors are associated with warm words [8]. However, this is not merely an implicit association; something casual about this relationship between heat and aggression makes us more reactive to potential adverse events and how it changes how humans perceive the environment around them. ...
... This starts even before actual heat is applied, as some experiments have demonstrated that even simply priming participants with the idea of heat can increase aggressive behaviors, thoughts, and feelings. In one such study, participants were shown images and words commonly associated with heat [8]. The research team found that priming some participants with heat-related words and imagery led participants to perceive neutral facial expressions as aggressive and to have more aggressive thoughts. ...
Article
Full-text available
As the climate crisis has progressed, scientists have begun to ask, "How does a rapidly warming ecosystem impact human behavior?" As aggression scholars and non-professional environmentalists, it has become increasingly clear that the impact of the climate crisis, without intervention, will dramatically increase humans' exposure to risk factors known to cause aggressive and violent behavior. This article describes a model that explains the indirect and direct effects of the climate crisis on aggression and violence, both on an individual level and broadly on group dynamics. We propose that systemic and global intervention strategies must be adopted to mitigate the severity of the climate crisis. This manuscript outlines the research demonstrating how climate change will increase human aggression and violence and then discusses potential interventions, such as holistic policies addressing immigration and income inequality. In discussing this topic, we provide insight into the intersectional nature of the consequences of rapid global warming.
... For example, metaphors linking anger with heat ("HOT-HEADED," "BURNING, SIMMERING, OR BOILING WITH RAGE") occur in very different languages and presumably reflect an embodied experience and metonymic connection: anger is commonly associated with flushing and feelings of heat in the face or head. This metaphoric association is found across disparate cultures, even where emotion lexicons vary substantially (Matsuki, 1995;Yu, 1995) and reflects the physiology of anger (Wilkowski et al., 2009). In contrast, loneliness, loss of social connection, and isolation may be described as cold (IJzerman et al., 2012). ...
Article
Full-text available
This issue of Transcultural Psychiatry presents selected papers from the McGill Advanced Study Institute on “Cultural Poetics of Illness and Healing.” The meeting addressed the cognitive science of language, metaphor, and poiesis from embodied and enactivist perspectives; how cultural affordances, background knowledge, discourse, and practices enable and constrain poiesis; the cognitive and social poetics of symptom and illness experience; and the politics and practice of poetics in healing ritual, psychotherapy, and recovery. This introductory essay outlines an approach to illness experience and its transformation in healing practices that emphasizes embodied processes of metaphor as well as the social processes of self-construal and positioning through material and discursive engagements with the cultural affordances that constitute our local worlds. The approach has implications for theory building, training, and clinical practice in psychiatry.
Conference Paper
Full-text available
Tangible user interfaces (TUIs) have been applied to assess, communicate, or regulate human core affect, emotions, or moods. Previous studies identified TUIs as an innovative way to serve people’s affective needs. This review examines the design and evaluation of tangible interactive systems that focus on human core affect, emotions, and moods. We provide an overview of current studies. We summarize how tangibility can be leveraged to support affective interaction, and we propose the dimensions of tangible affective interaction, deriving guidelines for design. We highlight three main challenges: understanding tangible affective interaction within real-life scenarios, utilizing embodied interaction to express or influence affective states, and establishing benchmarks for evaluating tangible affective interfaces.
Article
Embodied cognition contends that sensorimotor experiences undergird cognitive processes. Three embodied cross-domain metaphorical mappings constitute quintessential illustrations: spatial navigation and orientation underpin the conceptualization of time and emotion and gustatory sensation underlies the formulation of emotion. Threading together these strands of insights, the present research consisted of three studies explored the potential influence of spicy taste on people's metaphorical perspectives on time. The results revealed a positive correlation between spicy taste and the ego-moving metaphor for time such that individuals who enjoyed spicy taste (Study 1) and who consumed spicy (vs. salty) snack (Study 2) exhibited a predilection for the ego-moving perspective when cognizing a temporally ambiguous event. Because both spicy taste and the ego-moving metaphor are associated with anger and approach motivation, the latter two were postulated to be related to the novel taste-time relationship. Corroborative evidence for the hypothesis was found, which indicated that spicy (vs. salty) intake elicited significantly stronger anger toward and significantly greater approach-motivated perception of a rescheduled temporal event (Study 3). Taken together, the current findings demonstrate that spicy taste may play a role in people's perspectives on the movement of events in time and highlight the involved embodied interrelation between language, emotion, and cognition.
Article
Full-text available
The present research examines visual perception of emotion in both typical and atypical development. To examine the processes by which perceptual mechanisms become attuned to the contingencies of affective signals in the environment, the authors measured the sequential, content- based properties of feature detection in emotion recognition processes. To evaluate the role of experience, they compared typically developing children with physically abused children, who were presumed to have experienced high levels of threat and hostility. As predicted, physically abused children accurately identified facial displays of anger on the basis of less sensory input than did controls, which suggests that physically abused children have facilitated access to representations of anger. The findings are discussed in terms of experiential processes in perceptual learning.
Article
Full-text available
An evolved module for fear elicitation and fear learning with 4 characteristics is proposed. (a) The fear module is preferentially activated in aversive contexts by stimuli that are fear relevant in an evolutionary perspective. (b) Its activation to such stimuli is automatic. (c) It is relatively impenetrable to cognitive control. (d) It originates in a dedicated neural circuitry, centered on the amygdala. Evidence supporting these propositions is reviewed from conditioning studies, both in humans and in monkeys; illusory correlation studies; studies using unreportable stimuli; and studies from animal neuroscience. The fear module is assumed to mediate an emotional level of fear learning that is relatively independent and dissociable from cognitive learning of stimulus relationships.
Article
Full-text available
Do people aggress to make themselves feel better? We adapted a procedure used by G. K. Manucia, D. J. Baumann, and R. B. Cialdini (1984), in which some participants are given a bogus mood-freezing pill that makes affect regulation efforts ineffective. In Study 1, people who had been induced to believe in the value of catharsis and venting anger responded more aggressively than did control participants to insulting criticism, but this aggression was eliminated by the mood-freezing pill. Study 2 showed similar results among people with high anger-out (i.e., expressing and venting anger) tendencies. Studies 3 and 4 provided questionnaire data consistent with these interpretations, and Study 5 replicated the findings of Studies I and 2 using measures more directly concerned with affect regulation. Taken together, these results suggest that many people may engage in aggression to regulate (improve) their own affective states.
Article
Two experiments used a priming paradigm to investigate the influence of racial cues on the perceptual identification of weapons. In Experiment 1, participants identified guns faster when primed with Black faces compared with White faces. In Experiment 2, participants were required to respond quickly, causing the racial bias to shift from reaction time to accuracy. Participants misidentified tools as guns more often when primed with a Black face than with a White face. L. L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation procedure was applied to demonstrate that racial primes influenced automatic (A) processing, but not controlled (C) processing. The response deadline reduced the C estimate but not the A estimate. The motivation to control prejudice moderated the relationship between explicit prejudice and automatic bias. Implications are discussed on applied and theoretical levels.
Book
The now-classic Metaphors We Live By changed our understanding of metaphor and its role in language and the mind. Metaphor, the authors explain, is a fundamental mechanism of mind, one that allows us to use what we know about our physical and social experience to provide understanding of countless other subjects. Because such metaphors structure our most basic understandings of our experience, they are "metaphors we live by"--metaphors that can shape our perceptions and actions without our ever noticing them. In this updated edition of Lakoff and Johnson's influential book, the authors supply an afterword surveying how their theory of metaphor has developed within the cognitive sciences to become central to the contemporary understanding of how we think and how we express our thoughts in language.
Book
To what extent and in what ways is metaphorical thought relevant to an understanding of culture and society? More specifically: can the cognitive linguistic view of metaphor simultaneously explain both universality and diversity in metaphorical thought? Cognitive linguists have done important work on universal aspects of metaphor, but they have paid much less attention to why metaphors vary both interculturally and intraculturally as extensively as they do. In this book, Zoltán Kövecses proposes a new theory of metaphor variation. First, he identifies the major dimension of metaphor variation, that is, those social and cultural boundaries that signal discontinuities in human experience. Second, he describes which components, or aspects of conceptual metaphor are involved in metaphor variation, and how they are involved. Third, he isolates the main causes of metaphor variation. Fourth Professor Kövecses addresses the issue to the degree of cultural coherence in the interplay among conceptual metaphors, embodiment, and causes of metaphor variation. © Cambridge University Press 2005 and Cambridge University Press, 2010.