Rapid Semiautomated Subtyping of Influenza Virus Species during the 2009 Swine Origin Influenza A H1N1 Virus Epidemic in Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Department of Pediatrics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Journal of clinical microbiology (Impact Factor: 3.99). 07/2009; 47(9):2779-86. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00999-09
Source: PubMed


In the spring of 2009, a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus (swine origin influenza virus [S-OIV]) emerged and began causing a large outbreak of illness in Milwaukee, WI. Our group at the Midwest Respiratory Virus Program laboratory developed a semiautomated real-time multiplex reverse transcription-PCR assay (Seasonal), employing the NucliSENS easyMAG system (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) and a Raider thermocycler (HandyLab Inc., Ann Arbor, MI), that typed influenza A virus, influenza B virus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and subtyped influenza A virus into the currently circulating H1 and H3 subtypes, as well as a similar assay that identified H1 of S-OIV. The Seasonal and H1 S-OIV assays demonstrated analytical limits of detection of <50 50% tissue culture infective doses/ml and 3 to 30 input copies, respectively. Testing of the analytical specificities revealed no cross-reactivity with 41 and 26 different common organisms and demonstrated outstanding reproducibility of results. Clinical testing showed 95% sensitivity for influenza A virus and influenza B virus and 95 and 97% specificity compared to tissue culture. Comparisons of results from other molecular tests showed levels of positive agreement with the Seasonal and H1 S-OIV assay results of 99 and 100% and levels of negative agreement of 98 and 100%. This study has demonstrated the use of a semiautomated system for sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of influenza A virus, influenza B virus, and RSV and subtyping of influenza A virus into human H1 and H3 and S-OIV strains. This assay/system performed well in clinical testing of regular seasonal influenza virus subtypes and was outstanding during the 2009 Milwaukee S-OIV infection outbreak. This recent outbreak of infection with a novel influenza A (H1N1) virus also demonstrates the importance of quickly distributing information on new agents and of having rapid influenza virus subtyping assays widely available for clinical and public health decisions.

Download full-text


Available from: Karen Sue C Kehl, Jan 13, 2014
  • Source
    • "In addition, up to 24 samples may be tested simultaneously on the BD MAX platform with results obtained in less than 3 h, while the number of simultaneous samples tested by Xpert C. difficile PCR assay depends on the size of the GeneXpert system . In comparison to the GeneXpert system, the main advantage of the BD MAX instrument is the possibility of performing CE-IVD PCR assays and in-house PCR assays on the same molecular platform (Bose et al., 2009; Dalpke et al., 2012). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The evaluation of the fully-automated BD MAX Cdiff assay on a panel of 100 stools samples characterized by the Xpert C. difficile assay reported a high concordance between the two molecular assays (Kappa coefficient of 0.96), which makes this new assay suitable for routine detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.
    Full-text · Article · May 2013 · Journal of microbiological methods
  • Source
    • "After the worldwide outbreak of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (A/H1N1pdm), many diagnostic methods for detecting the causative virus, including the rRT-PCR assay, were established by many groups (Beck et al., 2010; Bose et al., 2009; Carr et al., 2009; Chidlow et al., 2010; Dong et al., 2010; Ge et al., 2009; Gunson et al., 2010; Hall et al., 2009; He et al., 2009; Jiang et al., 2010; Kubo et al., 2010; Lau et al., 2009; LeBlanc et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Pabbaraju et al., 2009; Poon et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2009; Wenzel et al., 2009; Whiley et al., 2009; Wu et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2009). Type A rRT-PCR and improved H1pdm rRT-PCR assays, as well as the newly developed H1 rRT-PCR and H3 rRT-PCR assays used for subtyping human seasonal influenza A viruses, were shown to have good linearity (R 2 = 0.99) and high sensitivity (Tables 2–4 and Fig. 1). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pandemic influenza A/H1N1 2009 (A/H1N1pdm) virus has caused significant outbreaks worldwide. A previous one-step real-time reverse transcription-PCR (rRT-PCR) assay for detecting A/H1N1pdm virus (H1pdm rRT-PCR assay) was improved since the former probe had a low melting temperature and low tolerance to viral mutation. To help with the screening of the A/H1N1pdm virus, rRT-PCR assays were also developed for detecting human seasonal A/H1N1 (H1 rRT-PCR assay) and A/H3N2 influenza viruses (H3 rRT-PCR assay). H1pdm, H1, and H3 rRT-PCR assays were evaluated using in vitro-transcribed control RNA, isolated viruses, and other respiratory pathogenic viruses, and were shown to have high sensitivity, good linearity (R(2)=0.99), and high specificity. In addition, the improved H1pdm rRT-PCR assay could detect two viral strains of A/H1N1pdm, namely, A/Aichi/472/2009 (H1N1)pdm and A/Sakai/89/2009 (H1N1)pdm, which have mutation(s) in the probe-binding region of the hemagglutinin gene, without loss of sensitivity. Using the three rRT-PCR assays developed, 90 clinical specimens collected between May and October 2009 were then tested. Of these, 26, 20, and 2 samples were identified as positive for A/H1pdm, A/H3, and A/H1, respectively, while 42 samples were negative for influenza A viruses. The present results suggest that these highly sensitive and specific H1pdm, H1, and H3 rRT-PCR assays are useful not only for diagnosing influenza viruses, but also for the surveillance of influenza viruses.
    Full-text · Article · Oct 2010 · Journal of virological methods
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On 17 April 2009, novel swine origin influenza A virus (S-OIV) cases appeared within the United States. Most influenza A diagnostic assays currently utilized in local clinical laboratories do not allow definitive subtype determination. Detailed subtype analysis of influenza A positive samples in our laboratory allowed early confirmation of a large outbreak of S-OIV in southeastern Wisconsin (SEW). The initial case of S-OIV in SEW was detected on 28 April 2009. All influenza A samples obtained during the 16 week period prior to 28 April 2009, and the first four weeks of the subsequent epidemic were sub typed. Four different multiplex assays were employed, utilizing real time PCR and end point PCR to fully subtype human and animal influenza viral components. Specific detection of S-OIV was developed within days. Data regarding patient demographics and other concurrently circulating viruses were analyzed. During the first four weeks of the epidemic, 679 of 3726 (18.2%) adults and children tested for influenza A were identified with S-OIV infection. Thirteen patients (0.34%) tested positive for seasonal human subtypes of influenza A during the first two weeks and none in the subsequent 2 weeks of the epidemic. Parainfluenza viruses were the most prevalent seasonal viral agents circulating during the epidemic (of those tested), with detection rates of 12% followed by influenza B and RSV at 1.9% and 0.9% respectively. S-OIV was confirmed on day 2 of instituting subtype testing and within 4 days of report of national cases of S-OIV. Novel surge capacity diagnostic infrastructure exists in many specialty and research laboratories around the world. The capacity for broader influenza A sub typing at the local laboratory level allows timely and accurate detection of novel strains as they emerge in the community, despite the presence of other circulating viruses producing identical illness. This is likely to become increasingly important given the need for appropriate subtype driven anti-viral therapy and the potential shortage of such medications in a large epidemic.
    Full-text · Article · Jun 2009 · Viruses
Show more