ArticlePDF Available

On the best estimations for dispersions of special ratio block sequences

Authors:
  • J. Selye University
  • Eszterházy Károly University
  • J. Selye University

Abstract

Properties of dispersion of block sequences were investigated by J. T. Tóth, L. Mišík and F. Filip [Math. Slovaca 54, 453–464 (2004; Zbl 1108.11017)]. The present paper is a continuation of the study of relations between the density of the block sequence and so called dispersion of the block sequence.
Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae
37 (2010) pp. 85–93
http://ami.ektf.hu
On the best estimations for dispersions of
special ratio block sequences
Ferdinánd Filipa, Kálmán Liptaib
Ferenc Mátyásb, János T. Tótha
aDepartment of Mathematics, J. Selye University
bInstitute of Mathematics and Informatics, Eszterházy Károly College
Submitted 4 October 2010; Accepted 24 November 2010
Dedicated to professor Béla Pelle on his 80th birthday
Abstract
Properties of dispersion of block sequences were investigated by J. T. Tóth,
L. Mišík, F. Filip [20]. The present paper is a continuation of the study of
relations between the density of the block sequence and so called dispersion
of the block sequence.
Keywords: dispersion, block sequence, (R)-density.
MSC: Primary 11B05.
1. Introduction
In this part we recall some basic definitions. Denote by Nand R+the set of all
positive integers and positive real numbers, respectively. For XNlet X(n) =
#{xX;x6n}. In the whole paper we will assume that Xis infinite. Denote by
R(X) = {x
y;xX, y X}the ratio set of Xand say that a set Xis (R)-dense
if R(X)is (topologically) dense in the set R+. Let us notice that the concept of
(R)-density was defined and first studied in papers [17] and [18].
Now let X={x1, x2,...}where xn< xn+1 are positive integers. The sequence
x1
x1
,x1
x2
,x2
x2
,x1
x3
,x2
x3
,x3
x3
, . . . , x1
xn
,x2
xn
,..., xn
xn
,... (1.1)
Supported by grants APVV SK-HU-0009-08 and VEGA Grant no. 1/0753/10.
85
86 F. Filip, K. Liptai, F. Mátyás, J. T. Tóth
of finite sequences derived from Xis called ratio block sequence of the set X. Thus
the block sequence is formed by blocks X1, X2,...,Xn,...where
Xn=x1
xn
,x2
xn
,..., xn
xn;n= 1,2,....
This kind of block sequences were studied in papers, [1] , [3] , [4] , [16] and [20]. Also
other kinds of block sequences were studied by several authors, see [2], [6], [8], [12]
and [19]. Let Y= (yn)be an increasing sequence of positive integers. A sequence
of blocks of type
Yn=1
yn
,2
yn
,..., yn
yn
was invetigated in [11] which extends a result of [5]. Authors obtained a complete
theory for the uniform distribution of the related block sequence (Yn).
For every nNlet
D(Xn) = max x1
xn
,x2x1
xn
,..., xi+1 xi
xn
,..., xnxn1
xn,
the maximum distance between two consecutive terms in the n-th block.
In this paper we will consider the characteristics (see [20])
D(X) = lim inf
n→∞ D(Xn),
called the dispersion of the block sequence (1.1) derived from X, and its relations
to the previously mentioned asymptotic density of the original set X.
At the end of this section, let us mention the concept of a dispersion of a general
sequence of numbers in the interval h0,1i. Let (xn)
n=0 be a sequence in h0,1i. For
every NNlet xi16xi26... 6xiNbe reordering of its first Nterms into a
nondecreasing sequence and denote
dN=1
2max max{xij+1 xij;j= 1,2,...N 1}, xi1,1xiN
the dispersion of the finite sequence x0, x1, x2,...xN. Properties of this concept
can be found for example in [10] where it is also proved that
lim sup
N→∞
NdN>1
log 4
holds for every one-to-one infinite sequence xn h0,1i. Also notice that the density
of the whole sequence (xn)
n=0 is equivalent to lim
N→∞ dN= 0. Also notice that the
analogy of this property for the concept of dispersion of block sequences defined in
the present paper does not hold.
Much more on these and related topics can be found in monograph [13].
On the best estimations for dispersions of special ratio block sequences 87
2. Results
When calculating the value D(X), the following theorems are often useful (See [20],
Theorem 1, Corollary 1, respectively).
(A1) Let
X={x1, x2,...}=
[
n=1
(cn, dni N,
where xn< xn+1 and let cn< dn< cn+1, for nN, be positive integers. Then
D(X) = lim inf
n→∞
max{ci+1 di:i= 1,2,...,n}
dn+1
.
(A2) Let Xbe identical to the form of Xin (A1). Suppose that there exists a
positive integer n0such that for all integers n > n0
cn+1 dn6cn+2 dn+1 .
Then
D(X) = lim inf
n→∞
cn+1 dn
dn+1
.
The basic properties of the dispersion D(X)and the relations between dispersion
and (R)-density are investigated in the paper [TMF]. The next theorem states the
upper bound for dispersions D(X)of (R)-dense sets where 16a= lim
n→∞
dn
cn<
(See [20], Theorem 10).
(A3) Let X=S
n=1 cn, dnENbe an (R)-dense set where cn< dn< cn+1 for all
nNand suppose that the limit lim
n→∞
dn
cn=aexists. Then
D(X)6min 1
a+ 1 ,max a1
a2,1
a2,
more precisely,
D(X)6
1
1+aif a h1,1+5
2)
1
a2if a h1+5
2,2)
a1
a2if a h2,).
The following theorem shows that in the third case (if a>2), that the dispersion
D(X)can be any number in the interval 0,a1
a2, where X=S
n=1 cn, dnENis
(R)-dense and lim
n→∞
dn
cn=a. Thus the upper bound for D(X)is the best possible
in the case a>2(See [4], Theorem 2).
88 F. Filip, K. Liptai, F. Mátyás, J. T. Tóth
(A4) Let a>1be a real number and kbe an arbitrary natural number. Then for
every α h0,ak1
a2kithere exists an (R)-dense set
X=
[
n=1
(cn, dni N
where cn< dn< cn+1 are positive integers for every nN, such that lim
n→∞
dn
cn=a
and D(X) = α.
In this paper we prove that in the second case if aD1+5
2,2, the dispersion
D(X)can be any number in the interval 0,1
a2, where X=
S
n=1 cn, dnENis
(R)-dense and lim
n→∞
dn
cn=a. Thus the upper bound for D(X)is the best possible
in the case aD1+5
2,2. The following lemma will be useful.
Lemma 2.1. Let the set
M(X) = {nN:cn+1 dn= max{ci+1 di:i= 1,2,...,n}} =
={m1< m2<···< mk< . . . }
be infinite. Then
D(X) = lim inf
k→∞
cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
.
Proof. Let nNbe an arbitrary integer such that n>m1. Then there is unique
kNwith mk6n < mk+1. >From the definition of the set M(X)we obtain
max{ci+1 di:i= 1,2,...,n}
dn+1
=cmk+1 dmk
dn+1
>cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
.
Then obviously
D(X) = lim inf
n→∞
max{ci+1 di:i= 1,2,...,n}
dn+1
>lim inf
k→∞
cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
.
On the other hand, the sequence cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
k=1 is a subsequence of the sequence
max{ci+1di:i=1,2,...,n}
dn+1 nN, hence
D(X) = lim inf
n→∞
max{ci+1 di:i= 1,2,...,n}
dn+1
6lim inf
k→∞
cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
.
The last two inequalities imply
D(X) = lim inf
k→∞
cmk+1 dmk
dmk+1
.
On the best estimations for dispersions of special ratio block sequences 89
Theorem 2.2. Let a1+5
2,2be an arbitrary real number. Then for every
α h0,1
a2ithere is an (R)-dense set
X=
[
n=1
(cn, dni N,
where cn< dn< cn+1 are positive integers for every nNsuch that lim
n→∞
dn
cn=a
and D(X) = α.
Proof. Let a h 1+5
2,2). According to (A4), it is sufficient to prove Theorem
2.2 for a1
a2< α 61
a2. Define function f(b) = b1
ab .Clearly fis continuous and
increasing on the interval ha, ). Moreover
f(a) = a1
a2and f(a2) = a21
a3.
We have a21
a3>1
a2if a>1+5
2. Thus there exists a real number a < b 6a2such
that b1
ab =α.
Define a set XNby
X=
[
n=1 AnBnN,
where for every nN
An= (an,1, bn,1i (an,2, bn,2iaBn=
n
[
k=1
(cn,k, dn,k i.
Put a1,1= 1 and for every nNand k= 2,3,...,n
bn,1= [aan,1] + 1, an,2=bn,1+ 1, bn,2= [aan,2] + 1 ,
cn,1= [bbn,2] + 1, dn,1= [acn1] + 1, cn,k = [bdn,k1] + 1, dn,k = [acn,k ] + 1 ,
and an+1,1= (n+ 1)dn,n.
Obviously for every nN
a < bn,1
an,1
6a+1
an,1
and a < bn,1
an,1
6a+1
an,1
,
and for k= 1,2,...,n
a < dn,k
cn,k
6a+1
an,1
.
First we prove that D(X) = α. We have the following inequalities:
cn+1,1bn+1,2>bbn+1,2bn+1,2>(b1)bn+1,2>(b1)a2an+1,1>
>(a1)a2an+1,1>aan+1,1> an+1,1> an+1,1dn,n
90 F. Filip, K. Liptai, F. Mátyás, J. T. Tóth
The inequality a2(a1) >afollows from a>1+5
2. Then
cn,2dn,1>bdn,1dn,1= (b1)dn,1>(b1)acn,1>(a1)acn,1>cn,1> cn,1bn,2
and for every k= 2,3,...,n1
cn,k+1 dn,k >bdn,k dn,k = (b1)dn,k >(b1)acn,k >
>(a1)acn,k >cn,k > cn,k dn,k1.
Finally
an+2,1dn+1,n+1 = (n+ 2)dn+1,n+1 dn+1,n+1 >
> dn+1,n+1 > cn+1,n+1 > cn+1,n+1 dn+1,n .
From the above inequalities we have for a sufficiently large nNthe following
inequalities:
1 = an,2bn,1< an,1dn1,n1< cn,1bn,2< cn,2dn,1< . . .
···< cn,n dn,n1< an+1,1dn,n .(2.1)
Now we use Lemma 2.1. From (2.1) one can see that it is sufficient to study
the quotients:
a)an+1,1dn,n
bn+1,2,
b)cn,1bn,2
dn,1,
c)cn,k dn,k1
dn,k for k= 2,3,...,n.
In case a)
lim inf
n→∞
an+1,1dn,n
bn+1,2
= lim inf
n→∞
(n1)dn,n
na2dn,n
=1
a2>α,
in case b)
lim inf
n→∞
cn,1bn,2
dn,1
= lim inf
n→∞
(b1)bn,2
abbn,2
=b1
ab =α
and in case c)
cn,k dn,k1
dn,k
6(b1)dn,k1+ 1
abdn,k1
6b1
ab +1
abdn,k1
6α+1
abdn,1
and cn,k dn,k1
dn,k
>(b1)dn,k1
abdn,k1+b+ 1 >
>b1
ab b1
ab
b+ 1
abdn,k1+b+ 1 >αb21
dn,1
.
From this it is obvious that D(X) = α.
It remains to prove that the set Xis (R)-dense. We have 1
a261
band 1
blal+2 61
bl+1al
for every l= 1,2,..., hence
On the best estimations for dispersions of special ratio block sequences 91
1
a2,1E
[
l=1 1
blal+2 ,1
blal1E= (0,1i
and it is sufficient to prove that the ratio set of the set Xis dense on intervals
1
a2,1Eand 1
blal+2 ,1
blallE
for every l= 1,2,....
Now we prove that the ratio set of Xis dense on 1
a2,1E. Let (e, f )1
a2,1E.
Put ε=fe. Consider the set
nan,1+ 1
bn,2
<an,1+ 2
bn,2
<···<bn,1
bn,2
<
<an,2+ 1
bn,2
<an,2+ 2
bn,2
<···<bn,21
bn,2
<bn,2
bn,2
= 1o,
(2.2)
which is obviously a subset of the ratio set of X. The largest difference between
consecutive terms of (2.2) is 2
bn,2. Then
an,1+ 1
bn,2
=an,1
bn,2
+1
bn,2
6an,1
a2an,1
+1
bn,2
=1
a2+1
bn,2
.
If we choose nNso that 2
bn,2< ε, then the interval (e, f )is not disjoint with (2.2),
hence the ratio set of Xis dense in the interval 1
a2,1E.
Let lNbe arbitrary. We prove that the ratio set of Xis dense in the interval
1
blal+2 ,1
blal1E. Let (e, f )1
blal+2 ,1
blal1E. Put ε=fe. Choose n1Nso
that n1> l and an,1+ 1 >2
εfor every n > n1. Consider the set
nbn,2
cn,l + 1 >bn,21
cn,l + 1 >··· >an,2+ 1
cn,l + 1 >bn,1
cn,l + 1 >
>bn,11
cn,l + 1 >··· >an,1+ 1
cn,l + 1 >an,1+ 1
cn,l + 2 >···>an,1+ 1
dn,l o,
(2.3)
which is obviously a subset of the ratio set of X. The largest difference between
consecutive terms of (2.3) is 62
an,1+1 . On the other hand,
lim
n→∞
bn,2
cn,l + 1 =1
blal1and lim
n→∞
an,1+ 1
dn,l
=1
blal+2 .
Then there exists n2N, such that for every n > n2
bn,2
cn,l + 1 >1
blal1εand an,1+ 1
dn,l
<1
blal+2 +ε .
If we choose n > max{n1, n2}, then the interval (e, f )is not disjoint with (2.3),
hence the ratio set of Xis dense in the interval 1
bl,al+2 ,1
bl,al1. This concludes
the proof.
92 F. Filip, K. Liptai, F. Mátyás, J. T. Tóth
References
[1] Bukor, J., Csiba, P., On estimations of dispersion of ratio block sequences, Math.
Slovaca, 59 (2009), 283–290.
[2] Hlawka, E., The theory of uniform distribution, AB Academic publishers, London,
1984.
[3] Filip, F., Mišík, L.,Tóth, J. T., Dispersion of ratio block sequences and asymp-
totic density, Acta Arith., 131 (2008), 183–191.
[4] Filip, F., Tóth, J. T., On estimations of dispersions of certain dense block se-
quences, Tatra Mt. Math. Publ., 31 (2005), 65–74.
[5] Knapowski, S., Über ein Problem der Gleichverteilung, Colloq. Math., 5 (1958),
8–10.
[6] Kuipers, L., Niederreiter, H., Uniform distribution of sequences, John Wiley &
Sons, New York, 1974.
[7] Mišík, L., Sets of positive integers with prescribed values of densities, Math. Slovaca,
52 (2002), 289–296.
[8] Myerson, G., A sampler of recent developments in the distribution of sequences,
Number theory with an emphasis on the Markoff spectrum (Provo, UT, 1991) vol.147,
Marcel Dekker, New York, (1993) 163–190.
[9] Mišík, L., Tóth, J. T., Logarithmic density of sequence of integers and density of
its ratio set, Journal de Théorie des Nombers de Bordeaux, 15 (2003), 309–318.
[10] Niederreiter, H.,On a mesaure of denseness for sequences, in: Topics in Classical
Number Theory, Vol. I., II., (G. Halász Ed.), (Budapest 1981), Colloq. Math. Soc.
János Bolyai, Vol. 34, Nort-Holland, Amsterdam, (1984) 1163–1208.
[11] Porubský, Š., Šalát, T. and Strauch, O., On a class of uniform distributed
sequences, Math. Slovaca, 40 (1990), 143–170.
[12] Schoenberg, I. J., Über die asymptotische Vertaeilung reeler Zahlen mod 1, Math.
Z., 28 (1928), 171–199.
[13] Strauch, O., Porubský, Š., Distribution of Sequences: A Sampler, Peter Lang,
Frankfurt am Main, 2005.
[14] Strauch, O., Tóth, J. T., Asymptotic density of ANand density of the ratio
set R(A),Acta Arith., 87 (1998), 67–78.
[15] Strauch, O., Tóth, J. T., Corrigendum to Theorem 5 of the paper “Asymptotic
density of ANand density of the ratio set R(A)”, Acta Arith., 87 (1998), 67–78,
Acta Arith., 103.2 (2002), 191–200.
[16] Strauch, O., Tóth, J. T., Distribution functions of ratio sequences, Publ. Math.
Debrecen, 58 (2001), 751–778.
[17] Šalát, T., On ratio sets of sets of natural numbers, Acta Arith., 15 (1969), 273–278.
[18] Šalát, T., Quotientbasen und (R)-dichte Mengen, Acta Arith., 19 (1971), 63–78.
[19] Tichy, R. F., Three examples of triangular arrays with optimal discrepancy and
linear recurrences, Applications of Fibonacci numbers, 7 (1998), 415–423.
[20] Tóth, J. T., Mišík, L., Filip, F., On some properties of dispersion of block
sequences of positive integers, Math. Slovaca, 54 (2004), 453–464.
On the best estimations for dispersions of special ratio block sequences 93
Ferdinánd Filip,János T. Tóth
Department of Mathematics
J. Selye University
Bratislavská cesta 3322
945 01 Komárno
Slovakia
e-mail: filip.ferdinand@selyeuni.sk
toth.janos@selyeuni.sk
Kálmán Liptai,Ferenc Mátyás
Institute of Mathematics and Informatics
Eszterházy Károly College
H-3300 Eger
Leányka út 4.
Hungary
e-mail: liptaik@ektf.hu
matyas@ektf.hu
... In this case [10,Theorem 10]). This upper bound for D(X) is the best possible if s ≥ 2 (see [4]) and in the case 1+ [3]). We prove that the above upper bound for D(X) is also optimal in the remainding case 1 ≤ s < 1+ √ 5 2 , i.e. ...
Article
Full-text available
In this paper, we study the behavior of dispersion of special types of sequences which block sequence is dense.
Article
Full-text available
The paper deals with a block sequence defined by formula presented where xn is an increasing sequence of positive integers. We discuss the set of all distribution functions of such sequences.
Article
Full-text available
In the paper sufficient conditions for the (R)-density of a set of positive integers in terms of logarithmic densities are given. They differ substantially from those derived previously in terms of asymptotic densities.
Article
In the first part of this short note we give an answer to a question asked by Franz J. Schnitzer (Leoben). Let (αk)k1 {({\alpha _k})_{k \geqslant 1}} denote the sequence of positive zeroes of the Bessel function J 0(x) in increasing order. We consider the triangular arrays (xkN)=(αkαN),1kN,NN ({x_{kN}}) = \left( {\frac{{{\alpha _k}}}{{{\alpha _N}}}} \right),1 \leqslant k \leqslant N,N \in N in [0,1). F.J. Schnitzer (personal communication) has conjectured that this triangular array is uniformly distributed modulo 1, i.e. limN1N#{kN:xkNI}=I \mathop {\lim }\limits_{N \to \infty } \frac{1}{N}\# \{ k \leqslant N:{x_{kN}} \in I\} = \left| I \right| (1) for any subinterval I[0,1) I \subseteq [0,1) of length ∣I∣.