Injuries in Amateur Rugby League Matches in New Zealand: A Comparison Between a Division 1 and a Division 2 Premier Grade Team

Emergency Department, Hutt Valley District Health Board, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
Clinical journal of sport medicine: official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.27). 08/2009; 19(4):277-81. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e3181a7c6b0
Source: PubMed


To investigate the incidence, site, nature, and severity of injuries in amateur rugby league in New Zealand at 2 different participation levels.
A nonconcurrent observational prospective cohort study design.
Rugby league match environment over the 2006 (division 2) and 2008 (division 1) competition seasons.
Members of the rugby league team participating in match activities.
For each injury, it was recorded in which division it occurred; how many games, if any, were subsequently missed; and the type, site, and severity of injury.
Injuries were reported as rate per 1000 hours, also broken down into severity according to the number of games missed.
Over the duration of the study periods, there was a combined total of 372 (division 1: 166 and division 2: 206) injuries recorded. The combined injury rate was 405 per 1000 playing hours (division 1: 266 per 1000 playing hours and division 2: 700 per 1000 playing hours).
The total injury incidence was higher than those previously reported for amateur and professional rugby league competitions. The incidence of missed match injuries for this study is also higher than missed match injuries reported for amateur, semiprofessional, and professional level competitions. The results of this study suggest that division 2 participants may have a lower fitness and skill level than division 1 participants. Further multidistrict prospective studies on the incidence of injuries in amateur rugby league competitions in New Zealand would enable further clarification on the actual total and missed match injury incidence and the incidence of tackle-related injuries in amateur competitions throughout New Zealand.

Download full-text


Available from: Doug A King, Oct 15, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper provides an overview of the epidemiology of rugby league injuries and associated costs in New Zealand requiring medical treatment. New Zealand national Accident Compensation Corporation injury data for the period 1999 to 2007 were searched for rugby league injury cases. Data were analysed by demographics, body region, nature/severity of injury, and medical procedure and costs. A total of 5941 injury entitlement claims were recorded over the study period with a significant decrease observed in the injury rate between the 1999-2000 and 2002-2003 reporting years. The total cost of the injuries for the study period was $42,822,048 (equivalent to pound15,916,072). The mean (SD) number of injury entitlement claims per year was 743 (271) and yearly cost was $5,352,760 (pound1,989,880) ($2,485,535 (pound923,994)). The knee was the most commonly reported injury site (225 per 1000 entitlement claims; $8,750,147 (pound3,252,020)) and soft tissue injuries were the most common injury types (474 per 1000 entitlement claims; $17,324,214 (pound6,438,599)). Accounting for only 1.8% of total injury entitlement claims, concussion/brain injuries accounted for 6.3% of injury entitlement costs and had the highest mean cost per claim ($25 347 (pound9420)). The upper and lower arm recorded the highest mean injury site claim cost of $43,096 (pound16,016) per claim. The 25-29 age group recorded 27.7% of total injury entitlement claims and 29.6% of total injury entitlement costs, which was slightly more than the 20-24 age group (27.3% claims; 24.7% costs). Nearly 15% of total moderate to serious injury entitlement claims and 20% of total costs were recorded from participants 35 years or older. This study identified that the knee was the most common injury site and soft tissue injuries were the most common injury type requiring medical treatment, which is consistent with other international studies on rugby league epidemiology. This study also highlights that the rate of injury and the average age of injured rugby league players increased over time. The high cost of concussion/brain injuries is a cause for concern as it reflects the severity of the injuries. Injury prevention programmes for rugby league should focus on reducing the risk of concussion/brain injury and knee and soft tissue injury, and should target participants in the 20-30 years old age range. More longitudinal epidemiological studies with specific details on injury mechanisms and participation data are warranted to further identify the injury circumstances surrounding participation in rugby league activities.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2009 · British Journal of Sports Medicine
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To explore and document perspectives on the return to play of players that have missed a training and/or rugby league match as a direct result of an injury occurring from participation in rugby league activities. Method: A prospective experimental study to identify, document and report player perspectives on reasons they returned to participation in rugby league following a missed match or missed training injury from rugby league activities. Results: A total of 63 people were enrolled in the study having recorded a missed training and/or match injury from 178 training sessions and 85 matches. There were 20 training injuries (4 per 1,000 training hours) and 73 match injuries (80 per 1,000 match hours) that were recorded as resulting in missed training and/or match activities. The majority of injured players returning to play were in paid employment (73%) with 26% either unemployed or enrolled as a student and 1% self employed. Only 79.6% of injured players saw a health professional as part of their rehabilitation process. The team coach was reported to have asked the player to return to rugby league activities in 28% of training return and 29% of match participation. More than three quarters of injured players felt that the recommended time off from training (75%) and match (80%) activities by health professionals were too long. Conclusions: The most powerful factor according to a third of all players was that being told they could return had the most significant influence on their decision. Of concern is that nearly a third also reported that the injury sustained was not as bad as first diagnosed. Therefore, it is crucial that players receive the best and perhaps more importantly the most qualified advice at this early stage of assessment to ensure correct treatment and ongoing management of their injuries.
    Full-text · Article · Jan 2010
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sports injuries can often be recurrent events, with subsequent (or repeat) injuries likely to be influenced by, and therefore different from, the first injury occurrence. While different modelling approaches have been used to analyse recurrent events, they often do not take into account correlation among the events. The aim of this study was to compare the applicability and relevance of a range of statistical models for the analysis of repeat injury count data and to provide a clear rationale for future modelling approaches for recurrent injuries. The models are demonstrated through direct application to Australian Rugby League injury data collected over three consecutive seasons. Three different models (Andersen-Gill approach, Poisson regression and negative binomial regression) were each individually fitted to the sports injury count data. Both analytical (F and bootstrap tests) and graphical approaches were used to select and compare models, including on data simulated according to various event-generating processes and differing in subject heterogeneity. Overall, the Poisson regression model provided the poorest fit to the real-world recurrent injury data and the simulated data. Although there was little difference in model fit between the remaining two models, in the interest of parsimony it is recommended that future studies routinely use the Anderson-Gill approach for the analysis of recurrent injuries. It is important that appropriate statistical methods are chosen to model recurrent injury data. To correctly specify and adequately fit recurrent injury event count data, flexible survival models should be routinely employed, with preference given to the Anderson-Gill approach.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2010 · Injury Prevention
Show more