Disclosure of APOE Genotype for Risk of Alzheimer's Disease

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
New England Journal of Medicine (Impact Factor: 55.87). 07/2009; 361(3):245-54. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809578
Source: PubMed


The apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype provides information on the risk of Alzheimer's disease, but the genotyping of patients and their family members has been discouraged. We examined the effect of genotype disclosure in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
We randomly assigned 162 asymptomatic adults who had a parent with Alzheimer's disease to receive the results of their own APOE genotyping (disclosure group) or not to receive such results (nondisclosure group). We measured symptoms of anxiety, depression, and test-related distress 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after disclosure or nondisclosure.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in changes in time-averaged measures of anxiety (4.5 in the disclosure group and 4.4 in the nondisclosure group, P=0.84), depression (8.8 and 8.7, respectively; P=0.98), or test-related distress (6.9 and 7.5, respectively; P=0.61). Secondary comparisons between the nondisclosure group and a disclosure subgroup of subjects carrying the APOE epsilon4 allele (which is associated with increased risk) also revealed no significant differences. However, the epsilon4-negative subgroup had a significantly lower level of test-related distress than did the epsilon4-positive subgroup (P=0.01). Subjects with clinically meaningful changes in psychological outcomes were distributed evenly among the nondisclosure group and the epsilon4-positive and epsilon4-negative subgroups. Baseline scores for anxiety and depression were strongly associated with post-disclosure scores of these measures (P<0.001 for both comparisons).
The disclosure of APOE genotyping results to adult children of patients with Alzheimer's disease did not result in significant short-term psychological risks. Test-related distress was reduced among those who learned that they were APOE epsilon4-negative. Persons with high levels of emotional distress before undergoing genetic testing were more likely to have emotional difficulties after disclosure. ( number, NCT00571025.)

Download full-text


Available from: Peter J Whitehouse, Jan 15, 2014
  • Source
    • "For example, the Genomes2People (G2P) Research Program in Translational Genomics and Health Outcomes (PI: RCG) conducts clinical trials, and combines survey and epidemiological methodologies to generate novel scientific evidence around medical, behavioral and economic outcomes of using genetics and genomics. G2P research studies began 15 years ago with clinical trials that have examined the impact of disclosing single gene risk for common complex disease202122and have continued to examine the impact of consumer genomics23242526. The G2P Program is now conducting randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of sequencing in the clinical care of adults (the MedSeq Project)272829and of newborns (the BabySeq Project) ( "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The integration of electronic medical records (EMRs) and genomic research has become a major component of efforts to advance personalized and precision medicine. The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network, initiated in 2007, is an NIH-funded consortium devoted to genomic discovery and implementation research by leveraging biorepositories linked to EMRs. In its most recent phase, eMERGE III, the network is focused on facilitating implementation of genomic medicine by detecting and disclosing rare pathogenic variants in clinically relevant genes. Partners Personalized Medicine (PPM) is a center dedicated to translating personalized medicine into clinical practice within Partners HealthCare. One component of the PPM is the Partners Healthcare Biobank, a biorepository comprising broadly consented DNA samples linked to the Partners longitudinal EMR. In 2015, PPM joined the eMERGE Phase III network. Here we describe the elements of the eMERGE clinical center at PPM, including plans for genomic discovery using EMR phenotypes, evaluation of rare variant penetrance and pleiotropy, and a novel randomized trial of the impact of returning genetic results to patients and clinicians.
    Preview · Article · Jan 2016
  • Source
    • "However , similar genes have not been identified for LOAD that accounts for >95% of AD cases. A few low penetrance genes and risk factor genes have been identified such as: APOE4 [2], SOLR1 [3], and those on the Alz- Gene data base ( for LOAD. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently available diagnostic tests have moved the field closer to early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, a definitive diagnosis is made only with the development of clinical dementia and the presence of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles at autopsy. An ideal antemortem AD biomarker should satisfy the following criteria: the ability to diagnose AD with high sensitivity and specificity as confirmed by the gold standard of autopsy validation; the ability to detect early-stage disease and track the progression of AD; and monitor therapeutic efficacy. Several AD biomarker technologies are currently under development, including in vivo brain imaging with PET and MRI (i.e., imaging of amyloid plaques) and biochemical assays of various factors in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and peripheral tissues. CSF biomarkers have received increased attention in the past decade. However, it is unclear whether these biomarkers are capable of early diagnosis of AD, prior to Aβ accumulation, or whether they can differentiate between AD and non-AD dementias. In addition, CSF biomarkers may not lend themselves to diagnostic screening of elderly patients, given the invasiveness of the required lumbar puncture procedure, inter-laboratory variability in techniques and sample handling, and the circadian fluctuation of CSF components. Although commonly viewed as an abnormality of the brain, AD is a systemic disease with associated dysfunction in metabolic, oxidative, inflammatory, and biochemical pathways in peripheral tissues, such as the skin and blood cells. This has led researchers to investigate and develop assays of peripheral AD biomarkers that require minimally invasive skin or blood samples.
    Full-text · Article · Nov 2014 · Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD
  • Source
    • "Participants were randomized to either disclosure of results for the risk allele or non-disclosure. The authors reported no significant differences between the two groups in anxiety or depression up to one year [14]. However, Dr. Clayton noted that the REVEAL study was comprised of individuals who were already aware of their AD risk because of family history, were extensively counseled about AD risk as part of their participation, and had consented to the study. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in DNA sequencing technology now allow for the rapid genome-wide identification of inherited and acquired genetic variants including those that have been identified as pathogenic alleles for a number of diseases including cancer. Whole genome and exome sequencing are increasingly becoming a part of both clinical practice and research studies. In 2013 the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) recommended that results of pathogenic genetic variants in 56 genes, nearly half of which comprise cancer genes (including BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53, MLH1, MLH2, MSH6, PMS2, and APC),be returned to patients who have their genome sequenced independent of the purpose for the test. This recommendation has been highly controversial for several reasons, particularlythe recommendation that individuals be returned secondary findings of disease causing variants for adult onset conditions regardless of age and without consideration of patient preferences. In addition, the policy regarding returning results of secondary findings from genomic sequencing studies in research settingsis currently unclear. In response to these emerging ethical issues, the Washington University Brown Schoolin St. Louis, MO, United Stateshosted apolicy forum entitled “First do no harm: Genetic privacy in the age of genomic sequencing” on February 25th, 2014. The forum included a panel of experts to discuss their views on ethical issues related to return of results in both the clinical and research settings. In this report, we highlightkey issues related to return of results from genome sequencing teststhat emerged during the forum.
    Full-text · Article · Sep 2014 · Journal of Cancer Policy
Show more