Article

Heart Malformation What Are the Chances It Could Happen Again?

Circulation (Impact Factor: 14.43). 08/2009; 120(4):269-71. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.878637
Source: PubMed
  • Source
    • "The incidence of CHD is 1% of all live births, although this is likely an underestimate as many anomalies do not require clinical intervention and remain undiagnosed (Mitchell et al., 2007; van der Bom et al., 2012). In addition to the estimated 40,000 new cases of CHD diagnosed in U.S. infants each year, it is estimated that at least another 40,000 individuals are born with undiagnosed heart defects that can contribute to disease later in their lives (Lau et al., 2011; Shieh and Srivastava, 2009). For example, undiagnosed abnormalities of atrioventricular valve development often result in valve deterioration and replacement surgeries in young adults (Nemer et al., 2008; Warnes et al., 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect. However, the majority of CHD cases have unknown etiology. Here we report the identification of ASXL2 and ASXL1, two homologous chromatin factors, as novel regulators of heart development. Asxl2-/- fetuses have reduced body weight and display congenital heart malformations including thickened compact myocardium in the left ventricle, membranous ventricular septal defect and atrioventricular valval stenosis. Although most Asxl2-/- animals survive to term, the neonates have patent ductus arteriosus and consequent lung hemorrhage and die soon after birth. Asxl1-/- fetuses have reduced body weight and display cleft palate, anophthalmia as well as ventricular septal defects and a failure in lung maturation. From these results, we conclude that normal heart development requires both ASXL proteins. In particular, ASXL2 plays an important role in heart morphogenesis and the transition from fetal to postnatal circulation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2014 · genesis
  • Source
    • "The influence of de novo changes on oligogenic disease is also unknown, however, it is possible that these genomic alterations combined with the effects of consanguinity could bring together the requisite components for disease. Furthermore, the epigenetic factors that contribute to CHD are largely unknown [Shieh and Srivastava, 2009], and it is unclear if consanguinity results in shared environmental contributions to disease. Different populations may be differentially susceptible to genetic and environmental perturbations , and it is important to continue these studies with a global perspective. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Consanguineous unions have been associated with an increased susceptibility to various forms of inherited disease. Although consanguinity is known to contribute to recessive diseases, the potential role of consanguinity in certain common birth defects is less clear, particularly since the disease pathophysiology may involve genetic and environmental/epigenetic factors. In this study, we ask whether consanguinity affects one of the most common birth defects, congenital heart disease, and identify areas for further research into these birth defects, since consanguinity may now impact health on a near-global basis. A systematic review of consanguinity in congenital heart disease was performed, focusing on non-syndromic disease, with the methodologies and results from studies of different ethnic populations compared. The risks for congenital heart disease have been assessed and summarized collectively and by individual lesion. The majority of studies support the view that consanguinity increases the prevalence of congenital heart disease, however, the study designs differed dramatically. Only a few (n = 3) population-based studies that controlled for potential sociodemographic confounding were identified, and data on individual cardiac lesions were limited by case numbers. Overall the results suggest that the risk for congenital heart disease is increased in consanguineous unions in the studied populations, principally at first-cousin level and closer, a factor that should be considered in empiric risk estimates in genetic counseling. However, for more precise risk estimates a better understanding of the underlying disease factors is needed.
    Full-text · Article · May 2012 · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Single gene mutations in Gata4 and Nkx2.5 genes have been identified as a causative factor for various clinical forms of hereditary congenital heart diseases (CHDs), especially for cardiac septal defects. However, the role of Gata4 and Nkx2.5 mutations in familial CHD is not clear yet. We report 5 cases of familial CHD with a positive history of cardiac septal defects. Our data suggest that mutations of either the Gata4 or Nkx2.5 genes are very uncommonly found in familial cases of CHD, supporting the genetic heterogeneity of cardiac congenital defects and the limitation of genetic testing in clinical setting.
    No preview · Article · Mar 2011 · Recenti progressi in medicina
Show more