Effects of age, gender, education and race on two tests of language ability in community-based older adults

Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
International Psychogeriatrics (Impact Factor: 1.93). 08/2009; 21(6):1051-62. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610209990214
Source: PubMed


Neuropsychological tests, including tests of language ability, are frequently used to differentiate normal from pathological cognitive aging. However, language can be particularly difficult to assess in a standardized manner in cross-cultural studies and in patients from different educational and cultural backgrounds. This study examined the effects of age, gender, education and race on performance of two language tests: the animal fluency task (AFT) and the Indiana University Token Test (IUTT). We report population-based normative data on these tests from two combined ethnically divergent, cognitively normal, representative population samples of older adults.
Participants aged > or =65 years from the Monongahela-Youghiogheny Healthy Aging Team (MYHAT) and from the Indianapolis Study of Health and Aging (ISHA) were selected based on (1) a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0; (2) non-missing baseline language test data; and (3) race self-reported as African-American or white. The combined sample (n = 1885) was 28.1% African-American. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression was used to model the effects of demographic characteristics on test scores.
On both language tests, better performance was significantly associated with higher education, younger age, and white race. On the IUTT, better performance was also associated with female gender. We found no significant interactions between age and sex, and between race and education.
Age and education are more potent variables than are race and gender influencing performance on these language tests. Demographically stratified normative tables for these measures can be used to guide test interpretation and aid clinical diagnosis of impaired cognition.

Download full-text


Available from: Chung-Chou Ho Chang
  • Source
    • "One month test-retest was 0.67 in normal subjects without dementia (Morris et al., 1989). Executive Function was measured with the IU Token Test (Yamamoto, Evans, Johnson & Unverzagt, 2003; Snitz et al., 2009). A sheet of paper with an array of circles and squares of varying size (small and large) and color (red, black, yellow, and green) is presented to the subject. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Normative information is important for appropriate interpretation of cognitive test scores as a critical component of dementia diagnosis in the elderly population. A cross-sectional evaluation of 1826 participants aged 65 years and older from four rural counties in China was conducted using six cognitive instruments including tests of global cognitive function (the Community Screening Instrument for Dementia), memory (Word List Learning and Recall tasks from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease, IU Story), language (Animal Fluency Test), and executive function (IU Token). Multiple regression models adjusting for demographic variables were used to provide standardized residuals z-scores and corresponding percentile ranking for each cognitive test. In all cognitive tests older age was associated with worse test performance while exposure to education was related to better cognitive test performance. We also detected a significant gender difference with men scoring better than women and a significant gender by education interaction on two tests. The interaction indicates that gender difference in test scores was much smaller in participants with more education than those who had less or no education. These demographically adjusted, regression-based norms can be a useful tool to clinicians involved with differential diagnosis of cognitive and memory disorders in older adults in rural China.
    Full-text · Article · Mar 2012 · The Clinical Neuropsychologist
  • Source
    • "cross - sectional studies which indicate significant differences in favor of the young–old adults with regard to the following dimensions : episodic memory (Bä ckman et al., 2000) ; linguistic comprehension – coherent with the fact that the onset of a decline in verbal processing skills occurs from 75 years – ( McGinnis , 2009 ) ; verbal fluency ( Snitz et al . , 2009 ) ; digit retention tasks ; digit and symbol tests and general cognitive ability tasks ( Read et al . , 2006 ) . Similarly , some studies ( Persad et al . , 2002 ) have reported an age"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective of this study was to analyze the similarities and differences in cognitive performance, level of dependency, cognitive plasticity and QoL in a sample of young-old adults and old-old adults, bearing in mind both the age-group (under or over 80 years) and the cognitive status of the participants. The study population consisted of 220 people living in sheltered accommodation for elderly people in the South of Spain, with an average age of 80.75 years. Participants were evaluated by means of cognitive performance tests, a QoL questionnaire, a depression scale and a dependency assessment scale. The results indicate that the main differences in the variables analyzed are due to the cognitive status of the sample and not to the fact that the participants are under or over 80 years of age. The findings show that major inter-individual differences in this stage of life depend not only on age but also on cognitive status, which is thus an important factor to take into account when working with this sector of the population.
    Full-text · Article · Dec 2010 · Archives of gerontology and geriatrics
  • Source

    Preview · Article ·
Show more