Evidence of Extranuclear Cell Sensitivity to Alpha-Particle Radiation Using a Microdosimetric Model. I. Presentation and Validation of a Microdosimetric Model

Inserm, U892, Nantes, F-44093 France.
Radiation Research (Impact Factor: 2.91). 07/2009; 171(6):657-63. DOI: 10.1667/RR1371.1
Source: PubMed


A microdosimetric model that makes it possible to consider the numerous biological and physical parameters of cellular alpha-particle irradiation by radiolabeled mAbs was developed. It allows for the calculation of single-hit and multi-hit distributions of specific energy within a cell nucleus or a whole cell in any irradiation configuration. Cells are considered either to be isolated or to be packed in a monolayer or a spheroid. The method of calculating energy deposits is analytical and is based on the continuous-slowing-down approximation. A model of cell survival, calculated from the microdosimetric spectra and the microdosimetric radiosensitivity, z(0), was also developed. The algorithm of calculations was validated by comparison with two general Monte Carlo codes: MCNPX and Geant4. Microdosimetric spectra determined by these three codes showed good agreement for numerous geometrical configurations. The analytical method was far more efficient in terms of calculation time: A gain of more than 1000 was observed when using our model compared with Monte Carlo calculations. Good agreements were also observed with previously published results.

Download full-text


Available from: Mickaël Bourgeois
    • "Experimental, modelling and simulation studies are beginning to investigate the importance of indirect damage to nuclear DNA and non-targeted effects (Stewart et al 2006, Averbeck 2010). While damage to nuclear DNA undoubtably determines the efficacy of cell death, there is growing evidence that radiation targets also exist within the cytoplasm, triggering complex biological responses that may not involve nuclear DNA (Morgan 2003a, 2003b, Matsumoto et al 2007, Chouin et al 2009a, 2009b, Hamada et al 2011, Dizdaroglu and Jaruga 2012, Kuncic et al 2012). Previous Monte Carlo simulations of such non-targeted radiation damage demonstrated that the cytoplasm can receive significantly more ionisations in comparison to the nucleus, emphasizing the need to take into account the response of the whole cell to nontargeted irradiation (Byrne et al 2013). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We performed in silico microbeam cell irradiation modelling to quantitatively investigate ionisations resulting from soft x-ray and alpha particle microbeams targeting the cytoplasm of a realistic cell model. Our results on the spatial distribution of ionisations show that as x-rays are susceptible to scatter within a cell that can lead to ionisations in the nucleus, soft x-ray microbeams may not be suitable for investigating the DNA damage response to radiation targeting the cytoplasm alone. In contrast, ionisations from an ideal alpha microbeam are tightly confined to the cytoplasm, but a realistic alpha microbeam degrades upon interaction with components upstream of the cellular target. Thus it is difficult to completely rule out a contribution from alpha particle hits to the nucleus when investigating DNA damage response to cytoplasmic irradiation. We find that although the cytoplasm targeting efficiency of an alpha microbeam is better than that of a soft x-ray microbeam (the probability of stray alphas hitting the nucleus is 0.2% compared to 3.6% for x-rays), stray alphas produce more ionisations in the nucleus and thus have greater potential for initiating damage responses therein. Our results suggest that observed biological responses to cytoplasmic irradiation include a small component that can be attributed to stray ionisations in the nucleus resulting from the stochastic nature of particle interactions that cause out-of-beam scatter. This contribution is difficult to isolate experimentally, thus demonstrating the value of the in silico approach.
    No preview · Article · Feb 2015 · Physics in Medicine and Biology
  • Source
    • "Alpha particles are capable of powerful cytotoxicity with relatively short effective path lengths in tissues. A single atom emitting an alpha particle can kill a target cell [24]. Therefore, radionuclides emitting alpha particles are very attractive for cancer therapy, especially to kill isolated malignant cells such as those observed in MM. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells within the bone marrow. Despite intense research to develop new treatments, cure is almost never achieved. Alpha-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) has been shown to be effective in vivo in a MM model. In order to define where alpha-RIT stands in MM treatment, the aim of this study was to compare Melphalan, MM standard treatment, with alpha-RIT using a [213Bi]-anti-mCD138 antibody in a syngeneic MM mouse model. C57BL/KaLwRij mice were grafted with 1×10(6) 5T33 murine MM cells. Luciferase transfected 5T33 cells were used for in vivo localization. The first step of the study was to assess the dose-response of Melphalan 21days after engraftment. The second step consisted in therapeutic combination: Melphalan followed by RIT at day 22 or day 25 after engraftment. Toxicity (animal weight, blood cell counts) and treatment efficacy were studied in animals receiving no treatment, injected with Melphalan alone, RIT alone at day 22 or day 25 (3.7MBq of [213Bi]-anti-CD138) and Melphalan combined with alpha-RIT. Fifty percent of untreated mice died by day 63 after MM engraftment. In mice treated with Melphalan alone, only the 200μg dose improved median survival. No animal was cured after Melphalan treatment whereas 60% of the mice survived with RIT alone at day 22 after tumor engraftment with only slight and reversible hematological radiotoxicity. No therapeutic effect was observed with alpha-RIT 25days after engraftment. Melphalan and alpha-RIT combination does not improve overall survival compared to RIT alone, and results in increased leukocyte and red blood cell toxicity. Alpha-RIT seems to be a good alternative to Melphalan. Association of these two treatments provides no benefit. The perspectives of this work would be to evaluate RIT impact on the regimens incorporating the novel agents bortezomide, thalidomide and lenalidomide.
    Full-text · Article · May 2014 · Nuclear Medicine and Biology
  • Source
    • "If subcellular localization is an important parameter when evaluating the efficacy in isolated tumor cells, or very small micro-metastases, its influence is negligible in our work since tumors of a few millimeters in diameter are studied. Specifically, by using a validated small-scale dosimetry code [49], we found that the mean absorbed dose delivered to one A-431 cell surrounded by similar cells (a cell packing of 0.74 was assumed in this model and one 212Pb atom attached to each cell) was the same (0.64 Gy) with internalizing and non-internalizing radiolabeled vectors. This result could be explained by the fact that, in 1–2 mm (or larger tumors) tumors, 95% of the received dose is due to cross-fire. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We assessed the contribution of antibody internalization in the efficacy and toxicity of intraperitoneal α-radioimmunotherapy (RIT) of small volume carcinomatosis using (212)Pb-labeled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that target HER2 (internalizing) or CEA (non-internalizing) receptors. Athymic nude mice bearing 2-3 mm intraperitoneal tumor xenografts were intraperitoneally injected with similar activities (370, 740 and 1480 kBq; 37 MBq/mg) of (212)Pb-labeled 35A7 (anti-CEA), trastuzumab (anti-HER2) or PX (non-specific) mAbs, or with equivalent amounts of unlabeled mAbs, or with NaCl. Tumor volume was monitored by bioluminescence and survival was reported. Hematologic toxicity and body weight were assessed. Biodistribution of (212)Pb-labeled mAbs and absorbed dose-effect relationships using MIRD formalism were established. Transient hematological toxicity, as revealed by white blood cells and platelets numbering, was reported in mice treated with the highest activities of (212)Pb-labeled mAbs. The median survival (MS) was significantly higher in mice injected with 1.48 MBq of (212)Pb-35A7 (non-internalizing mAbs) (MS = 94 days) than in animals treated with the same activity of (212)Pb-PX mAbs or with NaCl (MS = 18 days). MS was even not reached after 130 days when follow-up was discontinued in mice treated with 1.48 MBq of (212)Pb-trastuzumab. The later efficacy was unexpected since final absorbed dose resulting from injection of 1.48 MBq, was higher for (212)Pb-35A7 (35.5 Gy) than for (212)Pb-trastuzumab (27.6 Gy). These results also highlight the lack of absorbed dose-effect relationship when mean absorbed dose was calculated using MIRD formalism and the requirement to perform small-scale dosimetry. These data indicate that it might be an advantage of using internalizing anti-HER2 compared with non-internalizing anti-CEA (212)Pb-labeled mAbs in the therapy of small volume xenograft tumors. They support clinical investigations of (212)Pb-mAbs RIT as an adjuvant treatment after cytoreductive surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
    Full-text · Article · Jul 2013 · PLoS ONE
Show more